Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0125427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125427

Altered Fruit and Seed Development of Transgenic Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Over-Expressing MicroRNA394

Jian Bo Song 1,3, Xia Xia Shu 1, Qi Shen 2, Bo Wen Li 1, Jun Song 1, Zhi Min Yang 1,*
Editor: Harsh Raman4
PMCID: PMC4433277  PMID: 25978066

Abstract

Fruit and seed development in plants is a complex biological process mainly involved in input and biosynthesis of many storage compounds such as proteins and oils. Although the basic biochemical pathways for production of the storage metabolites in plants are well characterized, their regulatory mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we functionally identified rapeseed (Brassica napus) miR394 with its target gene Brassica napus LEAF CURLING RESPONSIVENESS (BnLCR) to dissect a role of miR394 during the fruit and seed development. Transgenic rapeseed plants over-expressing miR394 under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter were generated. miR394 over-expression plants exhibited a delayed flowering time and enlarged size of plants, leaf blade, pods and seed body, but developed seeds with higher contents of protein and glucosinolates (GLS) and lower levels of oil accumulation as compared to wild-type. Over-expression of miR394 altered the fatty acid (FA) composition by increasing several FA species such as C16:0 and C18:0 and unsaturated species of C20:1 and C22:1 but lowering C18:3. This change was accompanied by induction of genes coding for transcription factors of FA synthesis including LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (BnLEC1), BnLEC2, and FUSCA3 (FUS3). Because the phytohormone auxin plays a crucial role in fruit development and seed patterning, the DR5-GUS reporter was used for monitoring the auxin response in Arabidopsis siliques and demonstrated that the DR5 gene was strongly expressed. These results suggest that BnmiR394 is involved in rapeseed fruit and seed development.

Introduction

Rapeseed (oilseed rape, Brassica napus) is one of the major crops with great economical importance for its seed oil for human nutrition and protein for animal foodstuffs. For Brassicaceae family species like Arabidopsis and Brassica napus, a fruit, morphologically defined as a silique (or pod), is a specialized organ developed from gynoecium after fertilization of ovules [1, 2]. The fruit development is physiologically coupled with embryo development and seed maturation. An essential metabolic function of maturing seeds is the deposition of storage compounds such as lipid of triacylglycerols (TAGs) and proteins. Seeds of Brassica napus may accumulate storage lipids up to 50% or more based on their dry weight. As an excellent model system, the Brassica species seed development has become a major focus of plant research on the genetic control of seed filling with storage compounds [3].

A variety of genes involved in fruit and seed development have been identified recently from Brassica species. For example, the MADS-box gene FRUITFULL (FUL) was found to regulate valve development [4]. The FUL1 loss of function during Arabidopsis fruit development resulted in the failure of valve cells to elongate and differentiate. With respect to oilseed rape, an interest is placed on the manipulation of lipid levels through the genes involved in FA biosynthesis and triacylglycerol (TAG) assembly [5]. Genes controlling TAG biosynthesis and other relevant components have been well characterized, but the regulatory mechanism of the pathways is poorly understood. Recently, a group of microRNAs (miRNAs) have been found to involve embryo and seed development in plants [68]. miRNAs are a class of short (~21 nt) endogenous non-coding small RNAs that base pair sequences complementary with specific target genes to repress their translation or induce their degradation [9]. With genome-wide profiling of small RNAs from rapeseed crops, a large number of miRNAs involved in plant growth, development and environmental stresses have been identified [1017]. However, only few of miRNAs were functionally characterized as of today. Recently, miR397 from rice (Oryza sativa) has been identified to target an Oryza sativa laccase-like protein (OsLAC) gene, which involves plant sensitivity to brassinosteroids, grain size and panicle branching [18]. Also, ectopic expression of apple miR156h in Arabidopsis resulted in an extended juvenile phase, increased numbers of leaves, short siliques and the partial abortion of seeds [19]. We recently identified Arabidopsis miR394 and its target gene LCR (LEAF CURLING RESPONSIVENESS) and showed that both miR394 and LCR can coordinately regulate leaf morphology [20]. Furthermore, miR394 has been found to involve stem cell identity in Arabidopsis [21]. In this report, we show that Brassica napus miR394 with its target gene BnLCR is involved in rapeseed fruit and seed development. miR394 over-expression resulted in morphological changes in fruits and seeds. The storage oil contents and composition as well as protein and GLS were altered in the transgenic rapeseed over-expressing miR394. We further provided evidence that elevated BnLCR transcripts could also lead to defective phenotypes in fruit and seed developments. These results indicate that a proper miR394 level is necessary for the normal development of fruit and formation of seed of Brassica napus.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and cultivation

Seeds of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. Youyan No. 9) were surface-sterilized and uniformly germinating seeds were planted in pots (60 L) with soil (Yellow-brown soil, Eutric gleysols) at Experimental Station of Nanjing Agricultural University. The soil used was air-dried, gently crumbled and passed through a 2-mm sieve, with its basic properties summarized in Table A in S1 File. For Arabidopsis (ecotype, Col-0) plants, sterilized seeds were grown under hydroponic conditions and vernalized in darkness at 4°C for 2 days before the plate was transferred to a growth chamber under the conditions of 16/8 h (day/night), 200 μE m-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation. After that, seedlings (seven day-old) were transferred to soil and placed in the growth chamber under the same condition.

Plant transformation

pCAMBIA1304 was used as the plant expression vector with or without CaMV35S as a promoter and NOS terminator as transcriptional termination sequences [22]. The target genes were PCR-amplified using primers with restriction enzyme sites at the 5'-end of forward and reverse primers, respectively. PCR amplified component sequences were first cloned to a T/A vector (pMD19, Takara), sequenced and digested. The digested segments were cloned into pCAMBIA1304 and the cloning was confirmed by sequencing and restriction analysis. The validated clones were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 following the standard freeze thaw method of transformation. We also constructed an antisense LCR mRNA vector to examine the effect of LCR knock-down on fruit or seed development. All vectors containing corresponding genes were transferred into Brassic napus (Youyan No. 9) and Arabidopsis via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. In this study, all transgenic plants were used in the form of T3 generation.

GUS assay

Construction of miR394, LCR and DR5 reporter vectors and histochemical detection of GUS activity were performed based on the previous method [19, 23]. Briefly, the chemical regent 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D-glucuronic acid (X-Gluc) was used as a substrate. Leaf tissue was placed in X-Gluc solution [750 mg/mL X-Gluc, 100 mM NaPO4, pH 7, 3 mM K3F3 (CN)6, 10 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40] under a vacuum for 10 min at room temperature, then incubated overnight at 37°C.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA from plant tissues was isolated and 1.0 μg RNA was used as templates for cDNA synthesis. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted on CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Amplification reaction was performed in a 25 μL mixture containing 5 ng template, 12.5μL SYBR-Green PCR Mastermix (Toyoba, Japan) and 10 pmol primers. The temperature profile was 98°C for 30s, followed by 40 cycles at 98°C for 2s, 60°C for 5s and melt curve at 65°C 5s. Data were analyzed using CFX Data Analysis Manager Software. The relative expression level was normalized to that of the Actin, which was used as the internal control, with the 2-△CT method representing the relative quantification of gene expression [22]. The primers used for qRT-PCR are presented in Table B in S1 File.

Analysis of oil, proteins and GLS contents

Total oil, protein, and GLS contents of Brassica napus seeds were analyzed using a Foss NIRSystems 5000 near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (Foss NIRSystems Inc.). Approximate 3.5 g dried seeds were scanned in a 36 mm inner-diameter ring cup. The routine analytical process was run according to WinISI III manual instructions (Foss-tecator Infrasoft International LLC) [24].

The oil content was analyzed further by Soxhlet method using FOSS Fat Extraction System 2500 [25]. Briefly, rapeseed seeds were ground with FOSS sample grinding apparatus 1093. The seed powder was dried at 105°C for two hours and cooled to the room temperature in desiccator. The sample with 0.5 g accurately weighed and quantified for oil content. The sample was transferred into a Soxhlet tube and extracted with n-hexane as extract solvent. Extracting, solvent washing, solvent recovering and drying were performed respectively for 20, 40, 10 and 10 min based on the normalization procedure. The oil content (%) was calculated by the formula (added solvent weigh/sample weigh)×100%. For each sample, triplicates were performed and mean values of the triplicates were used to calculate the oil content. Analysis of fatty acid species was preformed using gas chromatography with the procedure documented.

Fatty acid composition analysis

The standard fatty acid methyl ester (99% purity) was purchased from Sangon Biotech [26]. The rapeseed seeds (0.5 g) were ground. Lipids were extracted with 5 mL solvent composed of diethyl ether / hexane petroleum ether (1:1, v/v), and fatty acid components of the total glycerolipids were converted into 3 mL methyl esters by transesterification with 0.5 mol L-1 NaOH for 30 min. One μL lipid extracted solvent was analyzed by gas chromatograph using Agilent 6890 N. The initial column temperature was 150°C hold 3 min, increasing at 5°C min-1 to 220°C, and then hold for 10 min. The peaks corresponding to each fatty acid species were recorded and identified by their characteristic retention times.

Statistical analysis

All experiments in the study were independently performed in triplicate. Each result shown in the figures was the mean of at least three replicated treatments and each treatment contained at least 30 plants. Unless indicated, the equal amount of mixed transgenic line seeds was used and samples for analysis were randomly selected from all transgenic lines. The significant differences between treatments were statistically evaluated by standard deviation and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The data between differently treated groups were compared statistically by ANOVA, followed by the least significant difference (LSD) test if the ANOVA result was significant at P<0.05.

Results

Analysis of miR394 and its target gene in Brassica napus

In Arabidopsis, miR394 family has two members, miR394a and miR394b with a predicted target gene coding for an F-box protein [27]. The Brassica napus miR394 (BnmiR394) was isolated from one of our small RNA libraries prepared from the rapeseed seedlings [12]. By the sequence of mature miR394 against the publicly available databases (NCBI), an ortholog target of miR394 in Brassica napus was predicted. Using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) approach, a full-length cDNA for the Brassica napus target of miR394 was isolated. Therefore, it was assigned as BnLCR. The miR394-guided cleavage of BnLCR has been confirmed by RACE (Figure A in S1 File) and further by our degradome analysis [16]. The CDS contains a 1404 bp long open reading frame (ORF) coding for a deduced protein of 467 amino acid residues (Figure B in S1 File), whose number is exactly the same as AtLCR from Arabidopsis [20]. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of BnLCR revealed common features, such as an F-box domain at the N-terminal region with 50-amino acids. Phylogenetic analysis showed that BnLCR is grouped together with orthologs from many other plant species (Figure C in S1 File). Isolation of Brassica napus DNA sequence corresponding to the BnLCR cDNA revealed a gene with the length of 2013 bp containing a 609 bp intron (Figure D in S1 File). These results indicate that both Arabidopsis and Brassica napus have the identical LCR genes.

To show the expression pattern of Brassica napus miR394 and its target LCR during the fruit and seed development, we developed transgenic Arabidopsis with GUS reporter genes fused to miR394a/b and LCR promoters, and monitored the GUS staining in flowers and fruits. The high GUS activity of pMIR394a::GUS and pMIR394b::GUS lines was detected at the early stage of young buds (Fig 1). But two days after flowering (DAF), the GUS activity attenuated but remained a low level throughout 2 to 20 DAF. In contrast, the GUS staining of pLCR::GUS plants was moderate at the early stage but became strong with the seed development. The highest GUS staining was detected at the late stages (16–20 DAF), when the strong GUS staining was observed nearly full of the siliques.

Fig 1. Promoter activity of miR394 and LCR in Arabidopsis flowers and developing siliques.

Fig 1

A: GUS staining of the transgenic Arabidopsis carrying pLCR::GUS (Pro::AtLCR), pMIR394a::GUS (Pro::miR394a) and pMIR394b::GUS (Pro::miR394b). GUS staining in flowers or siliques was identified with days after flowering (DAF). B: The relative expression of GUS in the transgenic Arabidopsis plants. The intensity was quantified using Adobe Photoshop CS software. Vertical bars represent SD of the mean of treatments (n = 3). Asterisks indicate that mean values are significantly different between the GUS intensity of Pro::AtLCR and Pro::miR394a or Pro::miR394b (P<0.05).

miR394 over-expression regulated fruit and seed development of Brassica napus

To investigate the biological function of miR394 during the rapeseed fruit and seed development, transgenic rapeseed plants over-expressing miR394a/b were generated. DNA fragments corresponding to the precursors of BnMIR394a and BnMIR394b were fused to 35S promoter and transformed into Brassica napus. Five transgenic independent lines were successfully obtained. The relative abundance of precursor miR394a/b (pre-miR394a/b) was further analyzed using RT-PCR, showing a similar increase in the transgenic lines (Fig 2A). In contrast, the expression of BnLCR in 35S::MIR394a/b lines was very lower and its expression level was only 20–40% of the WT.

Fig 2. Expression of Brassica napus precursor miR394a/b and its target BnLCR in wild type (WT) and the transgenic plants.

Fig 2

Total RNA from two week-old seedlings was extracted and transcripts were analyzed. A: transcripts of pre-miR394a/b and BnLCR were analyzed using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. B: Base paring of miR394 with the corresponding complementary site of BnLCR and a miR394-resistant form of BnLCR (Bnm6LCR). C: Transcripts of BnLCR in miR394-resistant (35S::Bnm6LCR) and miR394 non-resistant (35S::BnLCR) transgenic lines. Actin was used for cDNA normalization. The number below the band indicates relative abundance of the corresponding gene with respect to the loading controls Actin. or 35S:m5LCR plants and WT (p < 0.05).

We further generated a cleavage-resistant version (35S::Bnm6LCR) by introducing six silent mutations in the miR394 binding site but without changing the protein sequences (Fig 2B). As a control, a vector carrying the intact BnLCR mRNA sequence was constructed. Comparative analysis by RT-PCR showed that the level of BnLCR mRNA in the 35S::Bnm6LCR lines was 9.3–24.5 folds higher than that of WT, and its level in 35S::BnLCR plants was increased only by 2.0–2.6 folds compared to WT (Fig 2C).

miR394 over-expressing Brassica napus plants showed a larger cotyledon and true leaf area, while the blade area was smaller in 35S:Bnm6LCR plants compared to WT plants (Fig 3A and 3B). Interestingly, the 35S::BnMIR394a and 35S::BnMIR394b plants showed a lagged flowering time, whereas 35S::BnLCR and 35S::Bnm6LCR plants flowered earlier relative to WT (Fig 3C; Table 1). Moreover, miR394 over-expressing plants showed an enlarged size of plants, whereas BnLCR over-expressing plants had a shorten size compared to WT. We further made a comparative analysis of fruits between miR394 transgenic plants and WT, and found that although 35S::MIR394, 35S::Bnm6LCR and WT plants had bumpy appearance of pods, the 35S::MIR394 plants developed larger pods and the 35S::Bnm6LCR plants showed reduced pods relative to WT (Fig 3E; Table 1). Consistent with the observation, the seed weight and size were enlarged in 35S::MIR394 plants, while the opposite phenotypes were found in BnLCR over-expressing plants (Fig 3F and 3G).

Fig 3. Phenotypes in various transgenic plants including (a) WT; (b) 35S::BnMIR394a; (c) 35S::BnMIR394b; (d) 35S::antiBnLCR (transgenic plant over-expressing antisense mRNA of BnLCR); (e) 35S::BnLCR; (f) 35S::Bnm6LCR.

Fig 3

(A, B) Cotyledon and leaf phenotypes of seven-day-old seedlings. (C) Flowering stage. (D) Plant height phenotype of the transgenic plants at flowering stage. (E) Phenotypes of pods. (F) Seed shapes of the transgenic plants. The scale bar in the graph indicates 5 mm. (G) Seed weight of different transgenic Brassica napus plants. Vertical bars represent SD of the mean. Asterisks indicate that mean values are significantly different between the transgenic plants and wild-type (WT) (P<0.05).

Table 1. Over-expression of miR394 modified phenotypes of Brassica napus.

Transgenic plants Days after flowering Leaves number Height (cm) Branch position (cm) Diameter (cm) Length of pods (cm) Width of Pods (cm)
WT 0 17.22±0.38c 108.29±4.00b 37.60±2.74b 1.08±0.02e 8.32±0.07b 0.53±0.01b
35S::BnMIR394a-1 +4 22.44±0.51a 129.01±2.08a 62.43±3.62a 1.35±0.06a 11.03±0.83a 0.52±0.02b
35S::BnMIR394a-3 +3 20.67±0.33b 131.22±4.04a 62.75±1.77a 1.27±0.11b 10.98±0.49a 0.55±0.04b
35S::BnMIR394b-6 +2 20.67±0.58b 131.38±12.12a 60.85±4.01a 1.35±0.04a 10.06±0.57a 0.65±0.02a
35S::BnMIR394b-7 +3 19.56±0.69b 132.01±8.08a 62.68±3.42a 1.23±0.05c 8.97±0.27a 0.67±0.04a
35S::BnMIR394b-8 +2 19.22±0.51b 124.86±9.17a 58.63±0.53a 1.19±0.04d 10.12±0.69a 0.63±0.03a
Average -2.8 20.51±0.52 129.70±7.10 61.47±2.67 1.28±0.06 10.23±0.57 0.61±0.03
35S::Bnm6LCR-11 -4 13.33±0.33d 100.17±3.05c 22.25±1.54c 0.98±0.02f 7.03±0.76c 0.49±0.03b
35S::Bnm6LCR-12 -4 14.01±0.67d 98.44±3.61c 23.03±2.85c 1.07±0.07e 6.21±0.17c 0.51±0.03b
35S::Bnm6LCR-13 -4 13.89±0.38d 94.00±3.01c 29.80±2.23c 0.94±0.07f 6.67±0.26c 0.50±0.03b
Average -4 13.74±0.46 97.54±3.22 25.03±2.21 0.99±0.05 6.64±0.40 0.50±0.03

For each treatment, 30 plants were calculated. Values are the means ± SD. The different letters indicate that mean values are significantly different between the transgenic plants and wild-type (WT) (P<0.05). Branch position: the height where the first branch stem occurred.

Recently, the developing siliques and seeds of Arabidopsis as a model system have been investigated [2, 4, 28]. The 35S::miR394 and 35S::m5LCR (a miR394 cleavage-resistance version) transgenic Arabidopsis was used to examine the phenotypes of fruits and seeds. The silique wall of 35S::m5LCR Arabidopsis was strongly wavy compared to wild-type, and the shape of individual seeds was apparent from the outside of the silique; but no apparent defects were detected in 35S::MIR394a plant siliques (Fig 4A–4F). However, there was no difference of seed morphology between the transgenic plants and WT detected (Fig 4G–4I). We further quantitatively compared the silique width, length and seed number between 35S::MIR394a or 35S::m5LCR Brassica napus plants and wild type. Both 35S::MIR394a and 35S::m5LCR plants had a reduced silique width and length as well as the lower number of seeds compared to WT; however, only 35S::m5LCR plants showed a significant decrease in silique length (Table 1).

Fig 4. Fruit and seed development in transgenic Arabidopsis plants.

Fig 4

A-C: Morphology of wild-type (A), 35S::MIR394a (B) and 35S::m5LCR (C) plant siliques. D-F: Close-up view of images showing the valve and replum tissues of Arabidopsis fruit (stage 17b) of the wild type (D), 35S::MIR394a (E), and 35S::m5LCR (F) plant siliques by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). G-I: The seed phenotypes of wild-type (G), 35S::MIR394a (H) and 35S::m5LCR (I) plants. Bars, 1 mm (A, B, C); 200μm (D, E, F); 300μm (G, H, I).

miR394 over-expression altered oil content and FA accumulation in Brassica napus seeds

Because miR394 over-expression altered the fruit and seed morphology of Brassica napus, it wa assumed that the oil accumulation and FA composition might be changed. Compared to wild-type, the total oil content significantly decreased in the seeds of 35S::BnMIR394a/b plants, and the average oil contents in the 35S::BnMIM394a/b seeds were only 79.56% of the wild-type (Table 2). The oil content was also reduced in 35S:m6BnLCR transgenic plants, although the decrease of oil content was moderate as compared to wild-type.

Table 2. Total oil content of Brassica napus transgenic seeds.

Transgenic plants Total oil content (% dry weight) Percentage of the wild-type (%)
WT 41.45±0.51a 100
35S::BnMIR394a-1 30.39±0.05j 73.31
35S::BnMIR394a-3 33.18±0.18h 80.05
35S::BnMIR394b-6 32.09±0.28i 77.42
35S::BnMIR394b-7 34.95±0.17g 84.32
35S::BnMIR394b-8 34.27±0.42g 82.68
Average 32.98±0.22 79.56
35S::Bnm6LCR-11 38.08±0.22b 91.87
35S::Bnm6LCR-12 38.59±0.24b 93.10
35S::Bnm6LCR-13 36.41±0.03e 87.84
Average 37.69±0.16 90.93

Values are the means ± SD. The different letters indicate that mean values are significantly different between the transgenic plants and wild-type (WT) (P<0.05).

The major fatty acid species in the miR394 transgenic plants were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Most of fatty acid species in the transgenic lines showed variations of percentage (Table 3). In 35S::MIR394a/b plants, the average levels of C16:0 and C18:0 were increased approximately by 12.1 and 4.8%, respectively, as compared to the wild-type. C18:2 was increased by 13.6%, whereas C18:3 levels were reduced by about 19.1%. The very long-chain unsaturated fatty acid C22:1 species had a higher level (87.5%) in the 35S::MIR394a/b transgenic lines, and the 35S::m6LCR plants showed a changed level of the fatty acid species very similar to that of 35S::MIR394a/b.

Table 3. Fatty acid (FA) compositions in Brassica napus transgenic and wild-type (WT) seeds (mol %).

Genotype C16:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:2 C18:3 C20:1 C22:1
WT 4.45±0.04e 2.28±0.01e 59.50±0.42c 18.05±0.17d 9.09±0.10a 0.78±0.01c 0.16±0.04e
35S::BnMIR394a-1 4.91±0.08b 2.89±0.05b 63.07±0.35a 17.52±0.15e 7.38±0.01c 0.71±0.01c 0.21±0.05d
35S::BnMIR394a-3 4.94±0.04b 2.17±0.06f 63.08±0.52a 17.07±0.14e 6.49±0.05d 0.76±0.04c 0.38±0.08a
35S::BnMIR394b-6 5.21±0.04a 2.44±0.20e 56.82±0.14c 23.55±0.28a 7.76±0.28b 0.83±0.06a 0.19±0.10e
35S::BnMIR394b-7 5.01±0.03b 2.28±0.03e 56.67±0.14c 21.97±0.26b 7.33±0.28c 0.88±0.13a 0.33±0.01b
35S::BnMIR394b-8 4.86±0.08b 2.15±0.01f 55.91±0.36d 22.37±0.18a 7.78±0.03b 0.79±0.01b 0.38±0.01a
Average 4.99±0.05 2.39±0.07 59.11±0.30 20.50±0.20 7.35±0.13 0.79±0.05 0.30±0.05
35S::Bnm6LCR-11 4.66±0.01c 3.06±0.01a 59.29±0.12c 19.67±0.01c 7.96±0.01b 0.70±0.01e 0.22±0.01d
35S::Bnm6LCR-12 4.77±0.03b 2.44±0.04e 61.75±0.43b 17.75±0.11e 7.03±0.06c 0.77±0.01c 0.30±0.02c
35S::Bnm6LCR-13 4.73±0.08b 2.56±0.11d 56.93±1.85c 19.99±0.57c 8.00±0.27b 0.69±0.01e 0.45±0.16a
Average 4.72±0.04 2.69±0.05 59.32±0.80 19.14±0.23 7.66±0.11 0.72±0.01 0.32±0.06

Mature seeds were used for the analysis by GC-MS. Values are the means ± SD. The different letters indicate that mean values are significantly different between the transgenic plants and wild-type (WT) (P<0.05).

miR394 over-expression altered protein and GLS accumulation in Brassica napus seeds

Protein is one of the important constituents in Brassica napus seeds. Examination of the total protein content revealed that miR394 over-expressing plants accumulated more proteins than the wild-type, but no significant difference was observed between LCR over-expressing plants and wild-type (Table 4). GLS is a group of sulfur/nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites existing in many pungent plants such as mustard, rapeseed and horseradish. The natural chemicals derived from glucose and amino acids contribute to plant defense against pests and diseases [29]. Compared to wild-type, miR394 over-expressing plants usually had a relatively higher level of GLS, except for 35S::BnMIR394a-1 line (Table 4). In contrast, a generally lower level of GLS was determined in 35S::m6BnLCR plants.

Table 4. Protein and GLS content in Brassica napus transgenic seeds.

Genotype Protein Content (% dry weight) Percentage of wild-type (%) GLS content (μmol dry weight) Percentage of wild-type (%)
WT 22.86±1.48b 100 52.77±3.30c 100
35S::BnMIR394a-1 25.33±0.94a 110.81 50.18±18.93d 95.09
35S::BnMIR394a-3 26.66±0.39a 116.62 76.96±13.58a 145.84
35S::BnMIR394b-6 26.11±0.42a 114.22 57.75±2.29b 109.43
35S::BnMIR394b-7 26.71± 0.14a 116.84 60.99±5.29ab 115.58
35S::BnMIR394b-8 26.51± 0.28a 115.97 68.47±7.58a 129.75
Average 26.26±0.43 114.89 62.87±9.53 119.14
35S::Bnm6LCR-11 21.65±0.12b 94.71 43.96±2.06e 83.30
35S::Bnm6LCR-12 21.48±0.44b 93.96 46.87±1.21d 88.82
35S::Bnm6LCR-13 22.11±0.33b 96.72 45.16±1.46de 85.58
Average 21.75±0.30 95.13 45.33±1.58 85.90

Values are the means ± SD. The different letters indicate that mean values are significantly different between the transgenic plants and wild-type (WT) (P<0.05).

Regulation of seed lipid synthesis-responsive genes by over-expression of miR394

To get an insight into the lipid biosynthetic mechanism mediated by miR394, four major genes LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2), FUSCA3 (FUS3) involved in regulation of seed oil synthesis and ALTERED TRYPTOPHAN REGULATION1 (ATR1) for seed GLS synthesis were analyzed. LEC1 encodes an NFY-B-type or CCAAT-binding factor-type transcription factor [30]. LEC2 [31] and FUS3 [32] encode proteins also belong to the plant-specific B3 transcription factor gene family. The three key genes have been identified as controllers of seed maturation in Arabidopsis [33]. Compared to wild type, expression of LEC1 in 35S::BnMIR394a/b plants was increased by 10.0 and 3.7 fold, respectively, but expression of LEC2 in 35S::BnMIR394b plants was weak (Fig 5A and 5B). FUS3 expressed moderately in 35S::BnMIR394a/b plants and its transcripts were increased by 2.1 and 1.7 fold, respectively (Fig 5C). ATR1, a MYB transcription factor gene, controls GLS homeostasis by activating several enzymes responsible for biosynthesis of GLS. Expression of ATR1 in 35S::BnMIR394a/b plants showed a pattern similar to LEC1 and FUS3 (Fig 5D). In general, the 35S::Bnm6LCR plants showed depressed expression of LEC2, FUS3 and ATR1 or no change in LEC1 transcription.

Fig 5. Real-time PCR analysis of Brassica napus genes LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2), FUSCA3 (FUS3) involved in oil synthesis regulation and ALTERED TRYPTOPHAN REGULATION1 (ATR1) involved in glucosinolate synthesis.

Fig 5

The expression levels were measured in developing seeds 30 days after pollination (DAP). The relative expression level of each gene was normalized using BnACTIN2 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation of the mean treatments (n = 3). Asterisks indicate that mean values are significantly different between the 35S:MIR394 or 35S:m6LCR plants and WT (p < 0.05).

miR394-regulated fruit and seed development was possibly involved in auxin

Recent studies have shown that fruit and seed development is involved in local auxin abundance because it directs organ initiation and mediates tissue patterning [34]. To investigate whether miR394-regulated seed development was involved in auxin signal, transgenic plants with a pDR5::GUS reporter was constructed to visualize auxin responses in Arabidopsis fruits during the seed development. In wild-type developing fruits, the pDR5::GUS expression was always low and the GUS staining was nearly undetectable (Fig 6). In contrast, the pDR5-GUS expression of 35S:miR394 plant was significantly higher than that of wild-type. The 35S::m5LCR fruits had moderate expression of GUS gene. The DR5-GUS expression mainly occurred along the valve. A statistic analysis was made on DR5-GUS staining intensity using the method of Adobe Photoshop CS software [35], which showed a similar result in the corresponding fruits.

Fig 6. DR5-GUS expression in Arabidopsis wild type (Col), 35S::MIR394a and 35S::m5LCR fruits.

Fig 6

A: Visualization of DR5-GUS reporter in stage 17 fruits of pDR5::GUS/Col, pDR5::GUS/MIR394a and pDR5::GUS/m5LCR transgenic plants. B: Relative quantification of GUS intensity in stage 17 fruits of wild type (Col), 35S::MIR394a and 35S::m5LCR. The intensity of GUS coloration was statistically quantified using Adobe Photoshop CS software. Twenty fruits were measured. The relative intensity of WT is considered as 100%. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation of the mean treatments (n = 3). Asterisks indicate that mean values are significantly different between the 35S:MIR394a or 35S:m5LCR plants and WT (p < 0.05).

Discussion

Seeds of Brassicaceae family such as Brassica napus accumulate lipids mainly in the form of triacylglycerols as the major source of energy required for seed germination and post-germination growth. Although genetic screens and molecular identification have allowed for characterization of a number of genes related to seed development, oil production and biosynthesis of fatty acids in both Arabidopsis and Brassica napus [4, 5, 10, 3638], investigations on miRNAs involved in the fruit and seed development with regard to oil metabolism are lacking. Our results have shown that miR394 was expressed in flower buds, with a low abundance at the latter stage of seed development; in contrast, expression of LCR was relatively higher during the seed maturation. These results imply that both miR394 and LCR are possibly involved in the fruit and seed development. Over-expression of miR394 resulted in pleiotropic phenotypes in seed morphology. Compared to wild-type, 35S::miR394 rapeseed exhibited larger pods and seed bodies (Fig 3). In addition, miR394 over-expression let to the change in the seed oil content and FA composition (Tables 1 and 2). The phenotypes regulated by several miRNAs have been recently reported [39, 40]. For example, miR160, targeting AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 (ARF10), ARF16 and ARF17, plays important roles in seed germination and post-germination; transgenic plants expressing an miR160-resistant form of ARF10 displayed multiple developmental defects such as serrated leaves, curled stems, contorted flowers and twisted siliques [40]. The multi-target genes of miR160 should be responsible for the pleiotropic phenotypes.

Seed oil is mainly synthesized during the seed maturation phase. Alteration of seed development may affect the oil production and FA composition. We analyzed oil accumulation in the transgenic plants and found that the oil content in miR394 over-expressing Brassica napus was reduced. This could be attributed to the enlarged seed body of 35S::miR394 plants that made the seed oil content “diluted”. The reduced oil content in 35S::miR394 plants might be the result of the increased proportion of seed protein and GLS and other seed storage compounds. In higher plants, oil production and FA synthesis is a highly coordinated process involved in not only FA synthetic metabolism but also carbon and amino acid flux in the cells [41]. It is considered that the seed oil content is negatively correlated with the seed protein content [42]. In this study, over-expression of BnLCR also reduced the oil production compared to wild-type, although the protein content was not significantly lowed in the 35S::m6BnLCR plants. The complicated process for the repressed oil production in the transgenic plants remains to be elucidated.

The altered seed development in the 35S::miR394 rapeseed was biologically linked to the changed FA composition. Over-expression of miR394 led to the high proportion of C16:0 and C18:0, two end products of condensation reactions in the storage oil, and more significant abundance of unsaturated C22:1 species was found in the seeds. Conversely, the unsaturated C18:3 species was lower in miR394 over-expressing plants. Regulation of FA biosynthesis has been proposed to act at multiple levels, of which transcriptional control has been considered as a major molecular process [33]. To help understand the regulatory mechanism in miR394 over-expression plants, we analyzed the expression of three master regulatory genes coding for LEC1, LEC2, and FUS3 involved in FA synthesis and seed development, [3133]. Both LEC1 and LEC2 encode B3 transcription factors, which positively regulate oil synthesis but are not to function in a liner pathway [32, 33, 37]. It was reported that over-expression of LEC1 in Arabidopsis promoted the FA accumulation through a global induction of many FA biosynthetic genes [33]. In this study, expression of LEC1 was up-regulated in the 35S::miR394 plants. However, the expression of LEC2 in the 35S::miR394 plants was low. In agreement with LEC1, expression of FUS3 was positively but moderately regulated in 35S::miR394a plants. Brassicaceae is one of the few plant families that are able to produce GLS which tends to accumulate in developing seeds [43]. GLS accumulation was elevated in the miR394 over-expressing plants. Consistent with the observation, the transcript level of ATR1 responsible for biosynthesis of GLS was induced in 35S::miR394 plants. These results suggest that miR394-regulated GLS accumulation was mediated by ATR1. GLS are a class of secondary metabolites and regarded as defense compounds [43]. The elevated level of GLS in 35S::miR394 plants suggests that the plants may have potentials to work against biotic and abiotic stresses through GLS. Identification of the correlation of miR394 and GLS will help to understand the role of miR394 played in plant responses to stress such as pathogen attack and its resistant mechanisms.

Seed development (e.g. size) in higher plants is regulated by a number of intracellular components. Several factors (such as Auxin response factor 2 and Apetala 2) that act as a regulator of seed size have been identified [44]. Li et al. (2008) identified an ubiquitin receptor DA1 (Large) that acts synergistically with the E3 ubiquitin ligase ENHANCER1 OF DA1 (EOD1)/BIG BROTHER to regulate the final size of seeds in Arabidopsis thaliana [45]. Recently, a RING-type protein with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity encoded by DA2 has been characterized, and this protein regulates seed size by restricting cell proliferation in the maternal integuments of developing seeds [44]. These results indicate that E3 ubiquitin ligases play a role in seed development. With regard to the plant hormones, early genetic and molecular studies demonstrated that the SCFTIR1 ubiquitin ligase is able to positively regulate the auxin signaling in Arabidopsis [46]. The SCFTIR1 complex mediates auxin response by targeting members of the auxin/indoleacetic acid (Aux/IAA) family of transcriptional regulators for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in response to an auxin stimulus [47]. Because the phytohormone auxin is involved in many aspects of cellular and developmental responses in plants including fruit initiation and seed development [48], manipulation of the SCFTIR1 ubiquitin ligase would change the ubiquitin-mediated regulation of auxin signaling during seed development. However, as there are very limited numbers of signaling components identified from the auxin pathway, the molecular mechanisms for the ubiquitin-mediated regulation of auxin signaling during seed development are largely unknown [44, 49]. The present studies provided evidence that the DR5-GUS was strongly expressed in the fruit of both 35S:miR394 and 35S:m5LCR transgenic plants. This result is very similar to our previous report that DR5-GUS was also abnormally accumulated in the leaf tips or hydathodes of Arabidopsis [20]. Furthermore, expression of several auxin responsive genes such as IAA3, IAMT1, PIN1, PIN3, PIN4, and PIN7 has been upregulated in 35S:miR394 plants [20]. These results suggest that auxin in these organs was most likely to be involved in the process. The auxin profile has been characterized during the development of pod wall, dehiscence zone and seeds of Brassica napus pods [50]. A decrease in auxin content prior to moisture loss in the pods of Brassica napus was specifically detected in the dehiscence zone, and a minimized auxin was required for seed dispersal in Arabidopsis [34]. Consistent to the reports, a very low level of DR5-GUS was detected in the siliques of wild-type Arabidopsis. The high level of DR5-GUS detected in the siliques of miR394 over-expressing plants suggests that auxin distribution in these tissues was impaired due to the over-expression of miR394.

In conclusion, the present study identified miR394 and its target gene LCR from Brassica napus, which plays a role in mediating seed development with regard to seed morphology and composition of storage compounds. The coordinate expression of miR394 and LCR is necessary for proper fruit development and seed formation. This observation allowed us to postulate that LCR as an F-box protein gene may be involved in the mechanism responsible for regulating the abundance of putative components via protein degradation by the ubiquitin-dependant proteosome. Further investigation on miR394 and LCR with interaction to components in the auxin-responsive pathway will help understand how miR394 and LCR regulates its downstream genes responsible for the altered seed development.

Supporting Information

S1 File. Contains Figure A, miR394-guided cleavage site on BnLCR.

Figure B, CDS and deduced amino acid sequences of BnLCR. Figure C, Phylogenetic relationships of LCR between Brassica naups and other plant species. The name and GenBank accession number as follow: Ricinus communis (XP_002514903.1), Populus trichocarpa (XP_002297845.1), Citrus trifolita (ACL51019.1), Prunus persica (XP_007225618.1), Malus x domestica (XP_008353048.1), Vitis vinifera (XP_010655984.1), Cucumis sativus (XP_004140594.1), Glycine max (XP_006591447.1), Medicago truncatula (XP_003601765.1) Brassica napu (CDX84930.1), Arabidopsis thliana (NP_564278.1), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002459002.1), Zea mays (XP_008656925.1), Oryza sativa Japonica Group (NP_001045243.2), Brachypodium distachyon (XP_003564961.1), Triticum aestivum (AEK78079.1), and Hordeum vulgare (BAJ95420.1). Figure D, Genomic organization of Brassica napus LCR gene. The open boxes and lines denote the coding regions and introns, respectively. The gray box denotes the positions of the putative transit peptide sequences. The nucleotide-sequence length of each domain was marked by corresponding numbers. Table A, Basic physicochemical properties of the yellow-brown soil (Eutric gleysols) used for Brassica napus cultivation. Table B, Primers used in this study.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31071343) and Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province plans to graduate research and innovation (KYZZ_0181).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31071343) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (200910).

References

  • 1. Ferrándiz C (2002) Regulation of fruit dehiscence in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2002, 53: 2031–2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. González-Reig S, Ripoll JJ, Vera A, Yanofsky MF, Martinez-Laborda A (2012) Antagonistic gene activities determine the formation of pattern elements along the mediolateral axis of the Arabidopsis fruit. Plos Genetics 8: e1003020 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Purugganan MD, Fuller DQ (2009) The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457: 843–848. 10.1038/nature07895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gu Q, Ferrándiz C, Yanofsky M, Martienssen R (1998) The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development 125: 1509–1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vigeolas H, Waldeck P, Zank T, Geigenberger P (2007) Increasing seed oil content in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) by over-expression of a yeast glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase under the control of a seed-specific promoter. Plant Biochnol J 5: 431–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Willmann MR, Mehalick AJ, Packer RL, Jenik PD (2011) MicroRNAs regulate the timing of embryo maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155:1871–84 10.1104/pp.110.171355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nodine MD, Bartel DP (2010) MicroRNAs prevent precocious gene expression and enable pattern formation during plant embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 24:2678–92. 10.1101/gad.1986710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Seefried WF, Willmann MR, Clausen RL, Jenik PD. (2014) Global Regulation of Embryonic Patterning in Arabidopsis by MicroRNAs. Plant Physiol. 65:670–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhang BH, Pan XP, Cobb GP, Todd A. Anderson TA (2006) Plant microRNA: A small regulatory molecule with big impact. Develop Biol 2893: 1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Knauer S, Holt AL, Rubio-Somoza I, Tucker EJ, Hinze A, Pisch M, Javelle M, et al. (2013) A protodermal miR394 signal defines a region of stem cell competence in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Develop Cell 24: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Verma SS, Rahman MH, Deyholos MK, Basu U, Kav NN (2014). Differential expression of miRNAs in Brassica napus root following infection with Plasmodiophora brassicae. PLoS One. 9:e86648 10.1371/journal.pone.0086648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Huang SQ, Xiang AL, Che LL, Chen S, Li Hui, Song JB, et al. (2010) A set of miRNAs from Brassica napus in response to sulphate deficiency and cadmium stress. Plant Biochnol J 8: 887–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Korbes AP, Machado RD, Guzman F, Almerao MP, Valter de Oliveira LF, Loss-Morais G, et al. (2012) Identifying conserved and novel microRNAs in developing seeds of Brassica napus using deep sequencing. PLoS One 7: e50663 10.1371/journal.pone.0050663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhao YT, Wang M, Fu SX, Yang WC, Qi CK, Wang XJ (2012) Small RNA profiling in two Brassica napus cultivars identifies microRNAs with oil production- and development-correlated expression and new small RNA classes. Plant Physiol 158: 813–823 10.1104/pp.111.187666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Xu MY, Dong Y, Zhang QX, Zhang L, Luo YZ, Sun J, et al. , (2012) Identification of miRNAs and their targets from Brassica napus by high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. BMC Genomics 13: 421 10.1186/1471-2164-13-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhou ZS, Song JB, Yang ZM (2012) Genome-wide identification of Brassica napus microRNAs and their targets reveals their differential regulation by cadmium. J Exp Bot 63: 3443–3452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Huang D, Koh C, Feurtado JA, Tsang EWT, Cutler AJ (2013) MicroRNAs and their putative targets in Brassica napus seed maturation. BMC Genomics 14: 140 10.1186/1471-2164-14-140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang YC, Yu Y, Wang CY, Li ZY, Liu Q, Xu J, et al. (2013) Overexpression of microRNA OsmiR397 improves rice yield by increasing grain size and promoting panicle branching. Nature Biotech 31: 848–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sun C, Zhao Q, Liu DD, You CX, Hao YJ (2013) Ectopic expression of the apple Md-miRNA156h gene regulates flower and fruit development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Tissues Organ Culture 112: 343–351. 23439858 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Song JB, Huang SQ, Dalmay T, Yang ZM (2012) Regulation of leaf morphology by microRNA394 and its target LEAF CURLING RESPONSIVENESS . Plant Cell Physiol 53: 1283–1294. 10.1093/pcp/pcs080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Knauer S, Holt AL, Rubio-Somoza I, Tucker EJ, Hinze A, Pisch M, et al. (2013) A protodermal miR394 signal defines a region of stem cell competence in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Develop Cell 24: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Shen Q, Jiang M, Li H, Che LL, Yang ZM (2011) Expression of a Brassica napus heme oxygenase confers plant tolerance to mercury toxicity. Plant Cell Environ 34: 752–763. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02279.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Song JB, Gao S, Sun D, Li H, Shu XX, Yang ZM (2013) miR394 and LCR are involved in Arabidopsis salt and drought stress responses in an abscisic acid-dependent manner. BMC Plant Biol 13: 210 10.1186/1471-2229-13-210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wang XF, Liu GH, Yang Q, Hua W, Liu J, Wang HZ (2010) Genetic analysis on oil content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica 173: 17–24 [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Barthet VJ, Chornick T, Daun JK (2002) Comparison of methods to measure the oil contents in oilseeds. J Oleo Sci 51: 589–597. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Carvalho MS, Mendonça MA, Pinho DMM, Resck IS, Suarez PAZ (2012) Chromatographic analyses of fatty acid methyl esters by HPLC-UV and GC-FID. J Brazilian Chem Society 23: 763–769. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP (2004) Computational indentification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Molecular Cell 14: 787–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Crawford BCW, Yanofsky MF (2011) HALF FILLED promotes reproductive tract development and fertilization efficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana . Development 138: 2999–3009. 10.1242/dev.067793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sonderby IE, Geu-Flores F, Halkier B (2010) Biosynthesis of glucosinolates-gene discovery and beyond. Trend Plant Sci 15: 283–290. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lotan T, Ohto M, Yee KM, West MA, Lo R, Kwong RW, et al. (1998) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93: 1195–1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Stone SL, Kwong LW, Yee KM, Pelletier J, Lepiniec L, Fischer R, et al. (2001) LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proceeding National Academy Sciences USA 98: 11806–11811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Luerssen H, Kirik V, Herrmann P, Misera S (1998) FUSCA3 encodes a protein with a conserved VP1/ABI3-like B3 domain which is of functional importance for the regulation of seed maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 15: 755–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mu J, Tan H, Zheng Q, Fu F, Liang Y, Zhang J, et al. (2008) LEAFY COTYLEDON is a key regulator of fatty acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 148: 1042–1054. 10.1104/pp.108.126342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sorefan K, Girin T, Liljegren SJ, Ljung K, Robles P, Galvan-Ampudia CS, Offringa R, Friml J, Yanofsky MF, Østergaard L (2009) A regulated auxin minimum is required for seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 459: 583–587. 10.1038/nature07875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang L, Hua D, He J, Duan Y, Chen Z, Hong X, et al. (2011) Auxin response factor2 (ARF2) and its regulated homeodo-main gene HB33 mediate abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. Plos Genetics 7: e1002172 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nesi N, Delourme R, Bregeon M, Falentin C, Renard M (2008) Genetic and molecular approaches to improve nutritional value of Brassica napus L. seed. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331: 763–771. 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tan H, Yang X, Zhang F, Zheng X, Qu C, Mu J, et al. (2011) Enhanced seed oil production in canola by conditional expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEC1-LIKE in developing seeds. Plant Physiol 156: 1577–1588. 10.1104/pp.111.175000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Elhiti M, Yang C, Chan A, Durnin DC, Belmonte MF, Ayele BT, et al. (2012) Altered seed oil and glucosinolate levels in transgenic plants overexpressing the Brassica napus SHOOTMERISTEMLESS gene. J Exp Bot 63: 4447–4461. 10.1093/jxb/ers125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chen ZH, Bao ML, Sun YZ, Yang YJ, Xu XH, Wang JH, et al. (2011) Regulation of auxin response by miR393-targeted transport inhibitor response protein 1 is involved in normal development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 77: 619–629. 10.1007/s11103-011-9838-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu PP, Montgomery TA, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Nonogaki H, Carringtom JC (2007) Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J 52: 133–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Broun P, Gettner S, Somerville C (1999): Genetic engineering of plant lipids. Annul Review Nutrition 19: 197–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hao X, Chang C, Travis GJ (2004) Short communication: effect of long-term cattle manure application on relations between nitrogen and oil content in canola seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 167: 214–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ludwig-Muller J (2009) Glucosinolates and the clubroots disease: defense compounds or auxin precursors? Phytochem Revew 8: 135–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xia T, Dumenil J, Li J, Kamenski A, Bevan MW, Gao F, et al. (2013) The ubiquitin receptor DA1 interacts with the E3 ubiquitin ligase DA2 to regulate seed and organ size in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 25: 3347–3359. 10.1105/tpc.113.115063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Li Y, Zheng L, Corke F, Smith C, Bevan MW (2008) Control of final seed and organ size by the DA1 gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes & Development 22: 1331–1336. 10.1101/gad.463608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Moon J, Parry G, Estelle M (2004) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and plant development. The Plant Cell 16: 3181–3195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Gray WM, Kepinski S, Rouse D, Leyser O, Estelle M (2001) Auxin regulates SCF (TIR1)-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 414: 271–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Friml J (2003) Auxin transport—shaping the plant. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6: 7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ren ZX, Li ZG, Miao Q, Yang YW, Deng W, Hao YW (2011) The auxin receptor homologue in Solanum lycopersicum stimulates tomato fruit set and leaf morphogenesis. J Exp Bot 62: 2815–2826. 10.1093/jxb/erq455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chauvaux N., Child R, John K, Ulvskov P, Borkhardt B, Prinsen E, et al. (1997) The role of auxin in cell separation in the dehiscence zone of oilseed rape pods. J Exp Bot 48: 1423–1429. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. Contains Figure A, miR394-guided cleavage site on BnLCR.

Figure B, CDS and deduced amino acid sequences of BnLCR. Figure C, Phylogenetic relationships of LCR between Brassica naups and other plant species. The name and GenBank accession number as follow: Ricinus communis (XP_002514903.1), Populus trichocarpa (XP_002297845.1), Citrus trifolita (ACL51019.1), Prunus persica (XP_007225618.1), Malus x domestica (XP_008353048.1), Vitis vinifera (XP_010655984.1), Cucumis sativus (XP_004140594.1), Glycine max (XP_006591447.1), Medicago truncatula (XP_003601765.1) Brassica napu (CDX84930.1), Arabidopsis thliana (NP_564278.1), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002459002.1), Zea mays (XP_008656925.1), Oryza sativa Japonica Group (NP_001045243.2), Brachypodium distachyon (XP_003564961.1), Triticum aestivum (AEK78079.1), and Hordeum vulgare (BAJ95420.1). Figure D, Genomic organization of Brassica napus LCR gene. The open boxes and lines denote the coding regions and introns, respectively. The gray box denotes the positions of the putative transit peptide sequences. The nucleotide-sequence length of each domain was marked by corresponding numbers. Table A, Basic physicochemical properties of the yellow-brown soil (Eutric gleysols) used for Brassica napus cultivation. Table B, Primers used in this study.

(DOC)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES