Highlights
-
•
Small cell carcinoma of the ovary is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor.
-
•
No effective treatment for recurrent disease has yet been described.
-
•
Patients with recurrent disease may respond to salvage surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination of these modalities.
Keywords: Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, Hypercalcemic type, Radiotherapy, Recurrence
Introduction
Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a highly aggressive tumor that is generally fatal when it spreads beyond the ovary. Although stage IA disease is associated with a better prognosis, approximately 67% of patients recur regardless of treatment type (Young et al., 1994). Once recurrent disease develops, the tumors tend to be poorly responsive to chemotherapy and effective treatments have not been described (Young et al., 1994, Pautier et al., 2007, Scully, 1993). However, there are a few reports of rare patients who have survived after multi-modality treatment that included surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy for recurrent disease (Young et al., 1994, Cannon et al., 1975, Dickersin et al., 1982, Benrubi et al., 1993, Harrison et al., 2006, Niimi et al., 2006, Isonishi et al., 2008, Christin et al., 2008). Furthermore, previous reports have suggested that radiotherapy in the adjuvant setting has activity in the primary as well as recurrent SCCOHT (Young et al., 1994, Pautier et al., 2007, Scully, 1993, Cannon et al., 1975, Dickersin et al., 1982). In this report, we describe the case of a 35-year-old woman with stage IA SCCOHT with a sustained complete response following surgery and radiotherapy for recurrent disease. In addition, we review the available literature describing treatment for recurrent SCCOHT.
Case report
The patient initially presented at age 35 years with pelvic pain and abdominal distention. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a large right ovarian mass extending to the level of the umbilicus. Her CA125 level was 35 U/mL. She did not desire fertility preservation and underwent surgery including a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and a partial omentectomy. Final pathology revealed SCCOHT of the right ovary. The left ovary, bilateral fallopian tubes, uterus and omentum were all negative for disease. She received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3) administered every three weeks. She tolerated the chemotherapy without major toxicities. After completion of chemotherapy, imaging showed no evidence of disease. She was followed on a three-month interval with pelvic exam, CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, chest radiograph, and CA125 level. Twenty months after completing primary treatment, she developed recurrent disease with an isolated 8.2 cm para-aortic mass noted on CT scan. She underwent surgery including complete resection of the mass, as well as sampling of surrounding left para-aortic lymph nodes and a biopsy of the remaining omentum. Pathology confirmed recurrent SCCOHT in the para-aortic mass. The remaining para-aortic lymph nodes and omentum were negative.
The patient received postoperative radiotherapy to the para-aortic lymph nodes from T12/L1 to L4/L5, with an initial dose of 45 Gy using a 4-field technique with 18 MV photons. The fields were then reduced to cover only the operative bed as demarcated by clips placed at the time of surgery. This region was treated for an additional 5.4 Gy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Treatment was delivered over a total of 36 days. No chemotherapy was given. The treatment was tolerated well with the only symptom being mild nausea controlled with antiemetics. Imaging at the completion of therapy showed no evidence of disease. The patient has been followed with regular CT scans, chest radiographs and CA125 levels, and remains without evidence of disease fifteen years following the completion of radiotherapy for recurrent disease.
Discussion
SCCOHT is an aggressive disease and most patients develop progressive or recurrent disease despite treatment. No standard approach has been recommended for the treatment of recurrent disease, although multi-modality treatments including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been described. Although adjuvant thoracic radiotherapy has been demonstrated to improve survival in conjunction with chemotherapy in limited stage, small-cell lung carcinoma (Van Meerbeeck et al., 2011), the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of primary or recurrent SCCOHT is unclear.
In 1994, Young et al. (1994) described a large series of 150 cases of SCCOHT, with 75 patients (50%) having stage I disease. Fourteen of the forty two patients (33%) with stage IA disease for whom follow-up information was available remained without evidence of disease an average of 5.7 years following surgery (range 1–13 years). The remaining 28 patients (67%) with stage IA disease developed recurrent disease, with the majority dying of their disease. Five of the 14 patients with stage IA disease received adjuvant radiotherapy, and four (80%) are long-term survivors, suggesting that radiotherapy may have a role in the adjuvant therapy of this tumor. A previous study by Dickersin et al. (1982) described 11 patients with stage I/II SCOOHT. All patients were treated with surgery; four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, four patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and three patients received no adjuvant treatment. Two patients experienced durable responses with radiotherapy alone after initial surgery. Another series by Harrison et al. (2006) reported on 17 cases of SCCOHT. All patients underwent surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Seven patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and five (71%) are long-term survivors. Three of the four patients with stage I disease who did not receive radiotherapy developed recurrent disease. The results of these reports suggest that radiotherapy may play an important role in the primary treatment of SCCOHT.
Additional reports also provide evidence for radiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent SCCOHT. Young et al. (1994) and Cannon et al. (1975) described a patient with stage IA disease who developed a pelvic recurrence 12 months following a right salpingo-oophorectomy without adjuvant treatment. She underwent secondary tumor reductive surgery, pelvic radiotherapy and chemotherapy and remained without evidence of disease 10 years after completing therapy for recurrent disease. Furthermore, the series by Young et al. (1994) described two patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for recurrent disease that were alive at 3.8 and 7 years after completing treatment.
Given the rarity of SCCOHT, the available literature consists of small case series and single patient case reports. A review of the literature was therefore performed to evaluate patients who had a sustained complete response following treatment for recurrent SCCOHT, similar to the one presented in this report. Including the patient described in our report, 10 patients were identified meeting these criteria (Table 1). The median age at diagnosis was 21 years (range 10–35 years). Six patients had stage I disease (60%), three had stage II disease (30%) and one had stage III disease (10%). Nine patients (90%) underwent initial unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Eight patients (80%) initially underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, one (10%) underwent radiotherapy alone, and one (10%) did not receive any adjuvant treatment. All patients developed recurrent disease in the pelvis and/or abdomen. Surgery for recurrent disease was performed in eight patients, with two patients receiving no other adjuvant treatment for recurrence. Two patients had surgery followed by radiotherapy, two had surgery followed by chemotherapy, including one patient treated with high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation; and two had surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Two patients did not undergo surgery and received chemotherapy alone, including one patient treated with high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation. All patients had complete response after recurrent disease and were alive and without evidence of disease at time of publication.
Table 1.
Study author, year | FIGO stage | Age at diagnosis (years) | Primary surgery | Primary adjuvant treatment | Recurrence interval (months) | Recurrence site | Treatment for recurrence | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cannon et al. (1975), Young et al. (1994) |
IA | 23 | RSO | None | 12 | Pelvis | Surgery: resection of the right broad ligament. Radiotherapy: pelvis Chemotherapy: chlorambucil |
NED at 10 years |
Dickersin et al. (1982) | IA | 26 | RSO | Radiotherapy | 2 | Para-aortic LN and omentum | Surgery: TH, LSO and retroperitoneal LN dissection | NED at 9 months |
Young et al. (1994) | IA | 19 | RSO | Chemotherapy: cisplatin, velban, bleomycin | 4 18 |
Pelvis Anterior abdominal wall |
Surgery: TH and LSO Chemotherapy: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide Radiotherapy: pelvis Surgery: resection of mass Chemotherapy: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide |
NED at 45 months |
Young et al. (1994) | IA | 10 | LSO | Chemotherapy: cisplatin, velban | 5 | Para-aortic LN | Chemotherapy: cisplatin, velban, doxorubicin, vinblastine, etoposide | NED at 4 years, 5 months |
(Young et al. (1994), Benrubi et al. (1993)) | IIB | 16 | RSO | Chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, vincristine, etoposide Surgery: TH, LSO, omentectomy, appendectomy, para-aortic and pelvic LN dissection |
6 | NR | Surgery: TH, LSO, omentectomy, para-aortic LN dissection. Radiotherapy: whole abdomen |
NED at 7 years |
Harrison et al. (2006) | IC | 28 | USO, omentectomy | Chemotherapy: cisplatin, etoposide and carboplatin, paclitaxel | 9 | NR | Surgery: USO and omentectomy. | NED at 16 months |
Niimi et al. (2006), Isonishi et al. (2008) | IIC | 24 | LSO, omentectomy | Chemotherapy: cisplatin, etoposide, docetaxel | 8 | Uterus | Surgery: TH and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Chemotherapy: docetaxel | NED at 4 years |
Christin et al. (2008) | IIIC | 12 | LSO and para-aortic LN dissection | Chemotherapy: doxorubicin, etoposide, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin Surgery: RSO, omentectomy, pelvic and para-aortic LN dissection |
2 | Pelvis | Surgery: resection of parietal nodule and TH. Chemotherapy: carboplatin and ifosfamide followed by high-dose chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, melphalan) with autologous bone marrow transplantation | NED at > 14 years |
Christin et al. (2008) | IIC | 13 | LSO and omentectomy | Chemotherapy: bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin, ifosfamide Surgery: TAH, RSO, omentectomy, pelvic and para-aortic LN dissection |
0 | Para-aortic LN | Chemotherapy: ifosfamide and etoposide, followed by high-dose chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, melphalan) with autologous bone marrow transplantation. | NED at > 10 years. |
Callegaro-Filho (2014) | IA | 35 | TH, BSO, and omentectomy | Chemotherapy: cisplatin, etoposide | 20 | Para-aortic LN | Surgery: para-aortic LN dissection and biopsy of the omentum. Radiotherapy: para-aortic LN |
NED at 15 years |
TH: total hysterectomy; BSO: bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; LSO: left salpingo-oophorectomy; RSO: right salpingo-oophorectomy; LN: Lymph node; NED: no evidence of disease.
Conclusion
We describe the case of a patient with SCCOHT with long-term survival despite recurrent disease. Rare cases have been reported in the literature suggesting that some patients with recurrent disease may respond to salvage surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination of these modalities.
References
- Benrubi G.I1., Pitel P., Lammert N. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary with hypercalcemia responsive to sequencing chemotherapy. South. Med. J. 1993;86(2):247–248. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199302000-00025. (Feb) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cannon P.M., Smart C.R., Wilson M.L. Hypercalcemia with ovarian granulosa cell carcinoma. Rocky Mt. Med. J. 1975;72(2):72–74. (Feb) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christin A., Lhomme C., Valteau-Couanet D. Successful treatment for advanced small cell carcinoma of the ovary. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 2008;50(6):1276–1277. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21515. (Jun) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickersin G.R., Kline I.W., Scully R.E. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary with hypercalcemia: a report of eleven cases. Cancer. 1982;49(1):188–197. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820101)49:1<188::aid-cncr2820490137>3.0.co;2-d. (Jan 1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison M.L., Hoskins P., du Bois A. Small cell of the ovary, hypercalcemic type — analysis of combined experience and recommendation for management. A GCIG study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2006;100(2):233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.024. (Feb) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isonishi S1., Nishii H., Saitou M. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary: clinical and biological study. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;13(2):161–165. doi: 10.1007/s10147-007-0698-2. (Apr) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niimi S., Kiyokawa T., Takakura S. Recurrent small cell carcinoma of the ovary treated with docetaxel: a case report. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2006;16(5):1944–1946. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00707.x. (Sep–Oct) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pautier P., Ribrag V., Duvillard P. Results of a prospective dose-intensive regiment in 27 patients with small cell carcinoma of the ovary of the hypercalcemic type. Ann. Oncol. 2007;18(12):1985–1989. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm376. (Dec, Epub 2007 Aug 30) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scully R.E. Small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1993;12(2):148–152. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199304000-00010. (Apr) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Meerbeeck J.P., Fennell D.A., De Ruysscher D.K. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1741–1755. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60165-7. (Nov 12) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young R.H., Oliva E., Scully R.E. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. A clinicopathological analysis of 150 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1994;18(11):1102–1116. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199411000-00004. (Nov) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]