Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
. 2015 Mar 13;308(10):H1229–H1236. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00527.2013

Fibrosis worsens chronic lymphedema in rodent tissues

Laura L Lynch 1,*, Uziel Mendez 1,*, Anna B Waller 1, Amani A Gillette 1, Roger J Guillory II 1, Jeremy Goldman 1,
PMCID: PMC4436986  PMID: 25770241

Abstract

Secondary lymphedema in humans is a common consequence of lymph node dissection (LND) to treat breast cancer. A peculiar characteristic of the disease is that lifelong swelling often precipitously appears several years after the surgical treatment, often due to an inflammatory stimulus. Although the incidence of secondary lymphedema dramatically increases after radiation therapy, the relationship between fibrotic scarring and the eventual appearance of lymphedema remains unclear. To clarify the role of fibrosis in secondary lymphedema initiation, we chemically increased fibrosis in rodent tissues with bleomycin and assessed the ability of the local lymphatic system to prevent lymphedema, either acutely or in a chronic state induced by inflammation. We found that bleomycin injections exacerbated fibrotic matrix deposition in an acute mouse tail lymphedema model (P < 0.005), reduced wound closure (P < 0.005), and impaired the ability of tail lymphatics to regenerate (P < 0.005) and reduce the swelling (P < 0.05). When fibrosis was worsened with bleomycin after axillary LND in the rat foreleg, the ability of the foreleg lymphatic system to reduce the chronic state swelling induced by stimulated inflammation was severely impaired (P < 0.005). Indocyanine green lymphography in axillary LND-recovered rat forelegs revealed a worsened lymphatic drainage due to inflammation and bleomycin pretreatment. Although inflammation reduced the drainage of dextran fluid tracer from control forelegs (P < 0.05), the reduction in fluid drainage was more severe after axillary LND when fibrosis was first increased (P < 0.005). These findings demonstrate that fibrosis reduces the lymphatic capacity to functionally regenerate and prevent the chronic appearance of lymphedema.

Keywords: lymphangiogenesis, lymphatic drainage, axillary lymph node dissection, chronic secondary lymphedema, inflammation


secondary lymphedema in humans is a common consequence of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to treat breast cancer, which disconnects lymphatic vessels and excises the extracellular matrix from the axilla (7). The intervening surgical space forms into scar tissue, which has been demonstrated to hinder lymphatic regeneration and interstitial flow (1, 23, 27, 31, 32). We hypothesized that an inability of the lymphatic system to adequately regenerate during normal wound repair due to fibrotic scarring may predispose the tissue to develop secondary lymphedema (23, 31). A number of studies have attempted to clarify the regulation of interstitial flow and lymphatic regeneration across the surgical obstruction and within edematous tissues by molecules and matrix proteins expressed during wound repair. This has been the case in particular for proteins that regulate the extent of fibrotic scarring (1, 2, 8, 11, 23, 31, 34, 35). Importantly, it has been shown that a simple collagen gel implanted at the site of surgery, which reduces wound site fibrosis, can dramatically increase interstitial flow and lymphatic regeneration across the obstruction without the need for exogenous lymphatic growth factors (1, 6, 11, 23, 31).

An important characteristic of secondary lymphedema is that ∼25% of patients experience chronic lifelong swelling after an often years-long delay during which the initial lymphatic related injury has healed, whereas the other ∼75% never experience the swelling despite undergoing the same treatment (5, 7, 15, 19, 20). Notably, the incidence of secondary lymphedema dramatically worsens when radiation therapy is involved (12, 29), potentially due to the worsened fibrotic scarring incurred at the site of surgery (3, 9). Thus, the clinical features of the disease and accumulating experimental evidence in acute animal models suggest a relationship between fibrotic scarring at early times and the years-later appearance of lymphedema. However, the role of fibrosis as an underlying cause of chronic lymphedema as well as the mechanism by which fibrosis mediates its inhibitory effects on lymphatic adaptation remain unclear.

We recently demonstrated that the lymphatic system in the rodent foreleg remains chronically and latently impaired after ALND, even though there is no evidence of edema or lymphatic deficiency after the acute recovery (17, 18). The latent deficiency is made manifest and measurable in the form of an increased tissue swelling and decreased lymphatic drainage by an exogenous inflammatory stimulation (18). The etiology of swelling onset in the experimental model is similar to the induction of chronic swelling often seen in humans (5). Here, we hypothesized that fibrotic scarring may regulate the chronic and latent lymphatic impairment that follows ALND in the rat foreleg. To test this hypothesis, we compared the ability of the post-ALND regenerated foreleg lymphatic system to drain fluid and prevent edema during an acute inflammatory challenge in the presence or absence of a worsened wound site fibrosis. Because the complexity of the rat foreleg model can hinder mechanistic clarifications, a mouse tail model of lymphedema was used to gain insights into the mechanism by which fibrosis stimulation may impair lymphatic regeneration. Such an investigation is necessary to reveal whether fibrosis may regulate the chronic and latent post-ALND lymphatic function deficiency and to clarify the mechanisms of secondary lymphedema initiation in humans.

METHODS

Rat foreleg lymphedema model.

Female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250–300 g were used for all foreleg experiments. Rats were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane mixed with O2 gas for surgical procedures and were euthanized at experimental end points under 5% isoflurane and O2 gas by diaphragm puncture followed by cardiac excision. Axillary lymph nodes were removed from female rats, similar to what has been previously described for mice (17, 28) and rats (18). Briefly, a 10-mm-long surgical incision through the dermis was placed across the axilla on the right side, and the axillary lymph nodes were identified and excised along with visible portions of pre- and postnodal collecting vessels under an Olympus SZX7 stereo microscope. Two groups of twenty rats were divided into the following four groups: those receiving surgery or not [ALND(+) or ALND(−)] with and without bleomycin injections [bleomycin(+) or bleomycin(−)]. One group was used to confirm that the bleomycin injections promoted wound site fibrosis. The second group was used to assess the effects of acute inflammation on lymphatic foreleg drainage in bleomycin-treated rat axillas with or without ALND. All protocols for rats were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Michigan Technological University.

Mouse tail lymphedema model.

Tail skin edema was created in 6- to 8-wk-old balb/c mice by excising a 1-mm circular band of dermis (which contained the lymphatic capillary network) 2 cm from the base of the tail, leaving the underlying bone, muscle, tendons, and major blood vessels intact, similar to a previous study (23). Two groups of forty mice were divided into the following four groups: those receiving surgery or not [surgery(+) or surgery(−)] with or without bleomycin injections [bleomycin(+) or bleomycin(−)]. One group was used to investigate the effects of bleomycin treatment on fibrosis and lymphatic regeneration. The second group was used to assess the effects of the worsened fibrosis on the evolution of tail edema. All protocols for mice were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Michigan Technological University.

Bleomycin treatment.

Bleomycin has recently been used to induce fibrosis in rodent models of lymphedema (4). We injected bleomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) directly into rat forelegs and mouse tails to induce fibrosis. Repeated injections of 0.45 units bleomycin into rat axillas has been found in our preliminary study to induce fibrosis, yet created overt discomfort for the rat, used here as a general gauge of tissue injury. Because a major concern when using bleomycin is the induction of cell death, in addition to fibrosis (14), we alternated the bleomycin dose between high and medium levels. This dose induced fibrosis without overt animal discomfort. For the present study, right foreleg rat axillas were injected with 0.45 units bleomycin in 45 μl PBS on day 0. Injections then alternated between 0.3 units bleomycin in 30 μl PBS and 0.45 units bleomycin in 45 μl PBS every 3 days until day 12, for five total injections. For mouse tails, injections were made immediately distal to the wound site every 5 days, from days 5 to 25, for five total injections. Each tail injection consisted of 0.025 units bleomycin in 2.5 μl PBS. Control animals received the same volume of PBS at the same times and anatomic locations.

Oxazolone exposure.

Oxazolone (catalog no. E0753, Sigma) is a potent proinflammatory agent. Rats were allowed to fully recover from ALND. At 45 days post-ALND surgery, at which time there was no edema (data not shown), oxazolone was applied as recently described (18). Briefly, rats in all groups were sensitized by application of 300 μl of 2% oxazolone in ethanol to the abdomen. To initiate dermatitis, 300 μl of a 1.6% oxazolone solution of acetone and olive oil (4:1) was applied to the right forelegs of all rats starting at day 7 postsensitization (day 52 post-ALND surgery) and proceeding every 3 days thereafter until day 61 postsurgery, for a total of four applications. Optical images of right and left rat forelegs were collected before each application of oxazolone. Finally, rats were imaged via indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography, injected with lymphatic fluid tracer, and euthanized for cryosectioning of the foreleg on day 64 post-ALND.

Quantifying interstitial transport and lymphatic function.

Tetramethylrhodamine-conjugated lysine fixable dextran 70,000 molecular weight (catalog no. D1818, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 1 mg/ml in PBS was used as a fluorescent lymph tracer to quantify fluid drainage in the rat foreleg, as recently described (18). At the specified day postsurgery, 15 μl of fluorescent tracer solution were injected intradermally into the posterior of both foreleg paws. We allowed all rats to recover for 6 h after dextran injections to quantify lymph drainage postsurgery. Because the presence and distribution of the tracer across the foreleg depends on lymphatic drainage, the coverage of fluorescent tracer that is measured later in foreleg cross-sections can serve to quantify interstitial transport and lymphatic function. The extent of fluid marker coverage in cross-sections made at the wrist is a direct measurement of the ability of the fluid marker to spread interstitially from the paw injection site toward the lymphatics proximal to the wrist. Collected forelegs were cryosectioned at the wrist to produce 100-μm cross-sections. Sections were counterstained for cell nuclei with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (catalog no. H-1200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and imaged under an Olympus BX51 fluorescent microscope. The fluorescent tracer area of coverage was quantified using Metamorph Offline 6.3r7 software and expressed as a percentage of the total cross-sectional area of the foreleg tissue section.

Physiological measurements.

Digital images were collected of mouse tails and rat forelegs every 5 days, in addition to other times specifically indicated, with a DP71 camera mounted to a stereomicroscope (for imaging mouse tails) and a Nikon D5000 camera mounted to a tripod (for imaging rat forelegs). All swelling measurements for the mouse tail and rat foreleg were made from these digital images using Metamorph as well as ImageJ imaging software (Molecular Devices). Mouse tail diameter was measured at the point of greatest diameter distal to the wound site. Mouse tail area was measured by outlining the tail area beginning immediately distal to the wound site and proceeding down the tail for 10 mm. Wound closure was measured as the average distance between healthy tissue on both sides of the wound. Foreleg wrist thickness was measured from the digital images of the rat foreleg. Foreleg area was measured by outlining the paw, wrist, and leg 2.5 cm proximally from the wrist. Foreleg measurements were normalized to their respective preoxazolone, day 52, condition.

Imaging of functional lymphatic vessels via ICG fluorescence lymphography.

We used ICG fluorescence lymphography to identify functional lymphatic vessels after ALND, bleomycin treatment, and oxazolone exposure (n = 5 per group). An imaging system recently developed by Dr. N. Unno, Dr. F. Ogata, and Dr. Eva M. Sevick-Muraca (21, 22, 24, 25, 30) was used to detect functional lymphatic vessels in the rat foreleg. First, 7.5 μl of a 5 mg/ml solution of the fluorescent near-infrared dye ICG (catalog no. 17478-701-02, Akorn) was injected into the rat paw. Detection of ICG was performed with an electron multiplying charge-coupled device (C9100-13 Hamamatsu) using Hamamatsu recommendations as previously described (30). ICG was illuminated with an array of 760-nm LEDs (Epitex) placed before a 760-nm band-pass filter (model 760FS10-50, Andover) to provide the excitation light for activating ICG. A 785- and 763-nm custom made holographic notch band rejection filter (model HNPF-785.0-2.0 and HNPF-763.0-2.0, Kaiser Optical Systems) and a 830-nm image quality band-pass filter (model 830FS20-25, Andover) were placed before the camera lens to selectively reject the excitation light and pass the emitted 830-nm wavelength. After microdose paw injections of ICG dye, images were collected at 10 min to visualize the path of ICG drainage through the rat foreleg.

Detection and measurement of fibrosis and lymphatic regeneration.

Mason's trichrome stain was used on cross-sections of mouse tails and rat axillas to detect fibrotic changes in these tissues following the manufacturer's directions (catalog no. HT15-1KT, Sigma-Aldrich). This chemical treatment stains the cell cytoplasm and muscle fibers red and connective tissue blue/purple, thereby allowing fibrotic material to be distinguished. Fibrosis was quantified in mouse tail skin by measuring the thickness of the blue/purple matrix-dense region in stained cross-sections. Antibodies against LYVE-1 (ab14917, Abcam) were used to fluorescently label lymphatics in mouse tail skin cross-sections. For comparison purposes, the natural gap in lymphatic coverage seen in thin tail skin cross-sections due to the hexagonal architecture of the tail skin lymphatics was quantified along the longitudinal axis by measuring the distance between regularly repeating clusters of lymphatic structures. For bleomycin(+) surgery-treated tails, the distance was quantified by measuring the large lymphatic coverage gap that was clearly evident in cross-sections.

Statistical methods.

Five rats and ten mice were used for each experimental group, respectively. Data are presented as means ± SD. P values were calculated using ANOVA or repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Fibrosis promotes a sustained acute lymphedema.

We have previously shown that reducing fibrosis at the wound site of the mouse tail lymphedema model with a collagen gel implant significantly reduces tissue swelling (23). Here, to determine the effects of increased wound site fibrosis in the regulation of fluid drainage, we compared the ability of the mouse tail lymphatic system to drain accumulating fluid after lymphatic injury in the presence or absence of bleomycin treatment at the site of obstruction. We found that injections of bleomycin near the wound site produced visible fibrotic tissue in the context of tissue injury and swelling, whereas fibrosis was not externally visible on noninjured control tissue despite the same course of bleomycin injections (Fig. 1). Tissue swelling, as measured by the tail diameter and tail area, was strongly increased after surgery relative to both control groups irrespective of bleomycin treatment (P < 0.005 by repeated-measures ANOVA). Bleomycin treatment without surgery did not produce swelling (P > 0.5 by repeated-measures ANOVA). Bleomycin treatment after surgery [surgery(+), bleomycin(+)] caused a significant increase in tail area relative to the untreated surgical control group [surgery(+), bleomycin(−), P < 0.05 by repeated-measures ANOVA]. Thus, wound site fibrosis caused worsened tail swelling. Both surgical groups experienced a similar initial tail diameter and tail area trend, consisting of swelling that peaked at the same time and to the same degree but that then proceeded to diverge over time as swelling was sustained in the bleomycin(+) group and declined in the bleomycin(−) group. Thus, in the acute lymphedema model, worsened fibrosis with bleomycin treatments was found to impair fluid drainage across the site of obstruction and to sustain tissue swelling rather than worsen the degree of swelling. The ability of the wound site to heal naturally was strongly inhibited by bleomycin treatments, as shown by the large disparities in wound closure over time (P < 0.005 by repeated-measures ANOVA).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fibrosis promotes a sustained acute lymphedema. Shown are representative images of mouse tails at the indicated conditions on postsurgical days 0, 20, 40, and 60 postsurgery. Proximal to distal direction is shown top to bottom in each image. Scale bar = 5 mm. Yellow and green arrows indicate normal wound repair and fibrosis due to bleomycin, respectively, in the two enlarged images. Tail diameter, tail area, and wound closure data are shown for all groups in graphs on the right. *Statistical significance (P < 0.05); **high statistical significance (P < 0.005). n = 10 per group.

As noted above, we observed the formation of fibrotic material during wound repair in mouse tails that had received bleomycin injections after surgery. The fibrosis in these tails became apparent over time at the wound site and was generally absent by day 60 (Fig. 1), consistent with the timing of bleomycin injections. Mason's trichrome stain was used in histological cross-sections of tails collected on day 30 to confirm the presence of fibrosis and compare its distribution in deeper levels of the tissue. We found minimal signs of fibrosis in control tails (either with or without bleomycin). In contrast, extensive fibrosis consisting of increased connective tissue density was evident in tails that had experienced tissue swelling due to surgery in combination with bleomycin treatment (P < 0.005 by ANOVA; Fig. 2). The dense fibrotic biomatrix extended well into the subcutaneous space in tails that had received both bleomcyin and surgery. The findings demonstrate that bleomycin treatment promoted an extensive synthesis of fibrotic tissue in swollen tail skin.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Bleomycin and tissue swelling promote fibrosis of the mouse tail. Shown are representative images of Mason's trichrome-stained mouse tail cross-sections on day 30 postsurgery for tails that received PBS injections (A), bleomycin injections (B), PBS injections + surgery (C), and bleomycin injections + surgery (D). The epidermis is shown at the top of all images. Distal to proximal direction is shown left to right in each image. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. Data are graphically depicted in E for treatment groups shown in A–D. **High statistical significance (P < 0.005). n = 10 per group.

Fluorescent staining for lymphatics in cross-sections from the same mouse tails demonstrated dramatic lymphatic hyperplasia in swollen control skin and a potent suppression of lymphatic growth at the site of bleomycin injections (P < 0.005 by ANOVA; Fig. 3). The sustained tissue swelling from bleomycin in the acute model may therefore be causally related to the reduced wound closure and suppressed lymphangiogenesis due to fibrosis. Indeed, regenerating lymphatics and accumulating fluid both require a suitable matrix bridge across the obstruction and within the swollen tissue to spread toward proximal lymphatics. Furthermore, the fibrosis detected in the deeper connective layer of the skin may have compromised the functional regeneration of the deep collecting lymphatics, thereby contributing further to the worsened tissue swelling. Surprisingly, treatment of the first group of mouse tails with oxazolone on day 70 to induce inflammation did not result in significant tissue swelling in any group, despite four oxazolone applications over the subsequent 12 days (data not shown). Our inability to manifest inflammation swelling in the mouse tail stands in stark contrast to the significant swelling that we have reported after oxazolone treatment in the rat foreleg (18) and may be explained by the stiffer tissue of the tail relative to the axilla and foreleg. Therefore, to detect chronic postsurgical lymphatic deficiencies due to fibrosis, we used the rat foreleg lymphedema model.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Fibrosis inhibits lymphatic regeneration. Shown are representative low-magnification images of LYVE-1-stained mouse tail thick cross-sections (150 μm) on day 30 postsurgery for tails that received PBS injections (A), bleomycin injections (B), PBS injections + surgery (C), and bleomycin injections + surgery (D). Also shown are representative high-magnification LYVE-1-stained images from thin cross-sections (10 μm) for the same treatment groups (E–H), respectively. The epidermis is shown at the top of all images. Distal to proximal direction is shown right to left in each image. Scale bars = 0.5 mm in D and 0.1 mm in H. Data related to the distance between clusters of lymphatic structures are graphically depicted in I. **High statistical significance (P < 0.005). n = 10 per group.

Fibrosis worsens the post-ALND swelling induced by inflammation.

To reveal the presence of any worsened chronic lymphatic deficiencies due to the fibrotic scarring, we compared the ability of the regenerated foreleg lymphatic system after ALND and bleomycin treatment to prevent edema during an acute inflammatory challenge with that of the PBS-treated post-ALND foreleg lymphatic system (Fig. 4). After ALND surgery and bleomycin treatments and at all times up to day 52 (with measurements made every 5 days until day 50), there was no detectable swelling in any of the forelegs (data not shown). Beginning at 52 days post-ALND, long after quiescence of the acute wound healing phase, all right forelegs of sensitized rats were exposed to the proinflammatory agent oxazolone to challenge the foreleg lymphatic system and reveal the presence of any worsened latent lymphatic deficiencies due to bleomycin treatments. We detected a significant increase in the wrist diameter between oxazolone-treated ALND(−), bleomycin(−) control forelegs and both ALND(+), bleomycin(−) and ALND(+), bleomycin(+) forelegs (P < 0.05 by repeated-measures ANOVA). Measurements of the arm area revealed a significant increase in foreleg swelling between ALND(−), bleomycin(−) control forelegs and all other groups, with a highly significant difference found relative to ALND(+), bleomycin(+) forelegs (P < 0.005 by repeated-measures ANOVA). The results show that fibrosis, even in the absence of ALND, causes a chronic lymphatic deficiency and that worsened wound site fibrosis in conjunction with ALND creates the most severe chronic lymphatic deficiency. The presence of fibrosis at the wound site due to bleomycin injections was confirmed in histological cross-sections of rat axilla on day 15 postsurgery (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Fibrosis worsens the postaxillary lymph node dissection (post-ALND) swelling induced by inflammation. Shown are representative images of right rat forelegs at the indicated conditions on days 52 and 64. Scale bar = 10 mm. Wrist diameter and arm area were measured and graphed for all groups. *Statistical significance (P < 0.05) and **high statistical significance (P < 0.005) between groups. n = 5 per group.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Bleomycin stimulates fibrosis in the rat axilla. Shown are representative images of Mason's trichrome-stained rat axillas on day 15 postsurgery for those that received PBS injections (A), PBS injections + surgery (B), bleomycin injections (C), and bleomycin injections + surgery (D). The epidermis is shown at the top of all images. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. n = 5 per group.

Fibrosis worsens the post-ALND inflammation-induced lymphatic drainage impairment.

To clarify the mechanism by which fibrosis causes an increased post-ALND swelling, we visualized lymphatic drainage with ICG fluorescent lymphography on day 64, before euthanization. ICG dye in ALND(−), bleomycin(−), oxazolone(−) forelegs was seen to drain from the injection site by large lymphatic vessels leading toward the axillary lymph nodes (Fig. 6A), indicative of normally functioning lymphatic vessels in the healthy foreleg. In the presence of oxazolone, lymphatic drainage was reduced for all conditions, including for forelegs that did not undergo ALND or pretreatment with bleomycin (Fig. 5, B–E). However, ALND(−), bleomycin(−) forelegs appeared to have incurred the least reduction in lymph drainage (Fig. 6B). In contrast, ALND(+), bleomycin(+) forelegs appeared to have incurred the largest reduction in lymph drainage (Fig. 6E), as ICG dye in these forelegs was mainly restricted to the paw, near the injection site, indicative of a more serious lymphatic transport impairment.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fibrosis worsens the post-ALND inflammation-induced lymphatic drainage impairment. Shown are indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence lymphography images captured from ALND(−), bleomycin(−), oxazolone(−) (A), ALND(−), bleomycin(−), oxazolone(+) (B), ALND(−), bleomycin(+), oxazolone(+) (C), ALND(+), bleomycin(−), oxazolone(+) (D), and ALND(+), bleomycin(+), oxazolone (+) (E) forelegs at 64 days postsurgery. Images were captured at 10 min after the ICG paw injection. The paw injection site is shown to the left and the axilla to the right of each image. n = 5 per group.

Fibrosis reduces post-ALND interstitial transport and lymphatic function.

A second method was used to quantitatively assess the degree of lymph drainage impairment in rat forelegs. Fluorescent rhodamine-dextran was injected into rat paws to trace the path of lymph drainage through the foreleg and quantitatively assess the ability of the lymphatic system to drain macromolecules from the paw. Quantification was made by measuring fluorescent fluid tracer area coverage in histological foreleg cross-sections made at the wrist, near the injection site. The fluid marker was found to be strongly present interstitially and subcutaneously at the wrist location of all left forelegs, which were not treated with oxazolone (Fig. 7). The fluid marker was weakly present at the wrist location of all right forelegs, which were treated with oxazolone. A statistical analysis showed a significant reduction in tracer coverage in right versus left foreleg cross-sections for all groups (P < 0.05 by ANOVA) but identified a highly significant reduction in the ALND(+), bleomycin(+) group (P < 0.005 by ANOVA). These data indicate a worsened interstitial transport of the fluid marker from the injection site in the paw to more proximal lymphatic vessels due to ALND in conjunction with bleomycin treatment. Thus, fluid drainage was the most severely suppressed by the inflammatory stimulus after ALND surgery when fibrosis was first exacerbated with bleomycin. Our cumulative findings of a worsened foreleg swelling, worsened lymph drainage as seen with the ICG imaging, and reduced fluid transport as measured using rhodamine-dextran tracer demonstrates that increased fibrosis worsens the chronic lymphatic deficiency that follows ALND and precedes lymphedema.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fibrosis reduces post-ALND interstitial transport and lymphatic function. Dextran fluid marker was imaged in left and right foreleg wrist cross-sections from each condition, as shown. The red color in each image is fluorescent dextran lymph fluid tracer. The blue color in each image is 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole-labeled cell nuclei. Yellow arrows identify visible fluid marker. Rhodamine fluorescence was equally augmented in all images of right foreleg cross-sections to facilitate visualization. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. The graph shows fluid marker coverage. *Statistical significance (P < 0.05) and **high statistical significance (P < 0.005) between right and left forelegs. n = 5 per group.

DISCUSSION

Although fibrosis is a natural consequence of wound repair after ALND to treat breast cancer and inadvertently stimulating fibrosis at the wound site with radiation therapy dramatically increases susceptibility for secondary lymphedema, it remains unclear how fibrotic scarring contributes to the years-later appearance of chronic lymphedema in the arm. Here, we used two rodent models of lymphedema to demonstrate that fibrosis is a key regulator of both short- and long-term lymphatic function. Using an acute mouse tail lymphedema model, we first showed that fibrosis stimulation with bleomycin significantly impairs lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic drainage relative to controls. The sustained swelling and suppressed lymphatic regrowth that we found in the mouse tail when fibrosis was increased stands in sharp contrast to the increased functional lymphangiogenesis and rapidly ameliorated lymphedema that we recently reported when fibrosis was reduced with collagen gel implants (23). Second, using a rat foreleg model with a similar period of latency that follows ALND and fibrotic stimulation as is found in the human, we showed that the stimulated fibrosis worsens the latent and chronic lymphatic deficiency relative to what follows a physiological regeneration of the dissected axilla. We found that this worsened chronic lymphatic deficiency reduces the ability of the foreleg lymphatic system to prevent edema during acute inflammation, possibly by weakening lymphatic pump function due to the increased regional lymphatic outflow resistance. Our findings therefore demonstrate a clear link between fibrotic scarring and a worsened lymphedema and demonstrate a more chronically impaired lymphatic drainage and suppressed lymphangiogenesis as contributing mechanisms.

The mechanism by which fibrosis regulates lymphatic function and regeneration remains to be clarified. The components of the fibrotic matrix differ from those of the natural matrix, being composed mainly of thick bundles of collagen that reduce matrix compliance (33). Because lymphatics are often anchored to the surrounding matrix (26) and depend on compliant tissue to become functional (16), reduced tissue compliance may directly impair the function of lymphatics that traverse a fibrotic region. In addition, it has been shown that the fibrotic scarring produced from physiological wound healing impairs lymphangiogenesis and interstitial flows (14, 8, 11, 23, 31, 34, 35), most likely through molecular mediated signaling mechanisms and changes to matrix resistance to interstitial flow. Through both molecular inhibition of lymphangiogenesis signaling pathways and inhibition of interstitial flows shown to stimulate lymphangiogenesis (6), fibrosis at a wound site may inhibit the regeneration of lymphatics that become damaged during ALND and sentinal lymph node dissection. The present data support the notion that fibrosis may mediate its proedema effects by suppressing lymphatic regeneration and drainage. Clinical data on human subjects are strongly supportive of a critical role for fibrosis in impairing lymphatic regeneration during wound repair. For instance, radiation therapy without lymph node dissection (which induces fibrotic changes that reduce tissue compliance) or lymph node injury without radiation are both far less likely to result in secondary lymphedema relative to radiation therapy in conjunction with lymph node dissection (which creates an additional fibrotic barrier to lymphatic regeneration) (10, 13). We have recently found that a relatively scar-free regeneration of the extracellular matrix at the wound site (starting from a collagen implant) provides an interstitial bridge for lymph fluid to spread across the wound site to functional proximal lymphatics and serve as a scaffold for functional lymphangiogenesis (23, 31). These previous studies, when taken together with the present study, highlight the critical role of fibrosis in regulating lymphangiogenesis and interstitial flows during wound repair.

Unlike the time-delayed lifelong swelling experienced by humans, swelling appears immediately after surgery and completely resolves in acute animal models of lymphedema. Thus, it has often been difficult to apply experimental findings with acute models to clarify mechanisms in the human disease. Here, we demonstrated a causal relationship between fibrotic scarring during wound repair and the latter appearance of lymphedema. We showed that fibrotic scarring suppresses lymphatic regeneration and contributes to a chronic lymphatic deficiency that is able to remain latent and become manifest during periods of inflammation. We have recently shown that the chronic and latent lymphatic functional deficiency produced by ALND in the rat foreleg may consist of a reduced maximum lymph flow rate caused by an insufficient wound healing lymphangiogenesis (18). Worsening the fibrotic scarring with bleomycin, as we have done here, may further reduce the maximum lymph flow rate by more strongly impairing interstitial flow and lymphangiogenesis. In conditions of acute inflammation, the reduced lymphatic reserve results in a greater lymphatic flow reduction and an increased fluid accumulation relative to what occurs post-ALND after physiological wound repair. A similar mechanism of reduced capacity to drain an inflammation-induced swelling due to preexistant fibrosis and deficient lymphangiogenesis may play a role in the oftentimes sudden appearance of lymphedema in humans and in the increased incidence of lymphedema in humans who receive radiation therapy.

Several aspects of our results warrant additional comment. We found that bleomycin injections into the tail had no real consequence in the absence of surgery and tissue swelling, whereas the ALND(−), bleomycin(+) control group was found to have elevated arm area in rats. This may be accounted for by the softer tissues present in the foreleg relative to the tail, which may allow the foreleg to swell under lower interstitial fluid pressures. Indeed, although we saw an increased arm area, the wrist diameter (which lacks spaces containing soft connective tissue) was not increased despite a particularly severe response, as visualized by ICG in Fig. 6. We speculate that fluid preferentially accumulates in the arm relative to the wrist due to the presence of softer fatty tissues in the arm. The accumulation of fluid simultaneously in both the arm and wrist is therefore generally indicative of worsened lymphatic drainage relative to fluid accumulation in the arm alone. Our finding that tails did not swell in the surgery(−), bleomycin(+) mouse group contrasts with an earlier report (4) where bleomycin injections resulted in increased tail thickness even without surgery. This may have occurred because we injected 2.5 μl into mouse tails to avoid inducing an injection-related injury. In contrast, 10 μl were injected in the earlier report, which may have induced a stretch-related injury in the tail. Indeed, our results have shown that bleomycin may induce a more extensive fibrosis in the context of tissue swelling, which may facilitate the spread of bleomycin through the matrix. We also found a nonsignificant jump in wound closure on day 45 in the surgery(+), bleomycin (+) group. This may have been due to long-term changes in cell synthesis of fibrotic matrix induced by bleomycin.

Presently, therapies for treating secondary lymphedema have largely been directed at increasing lymphatic drainage with excess lymphatic growth factor to clear accumulated fluid after the disease onset. The appearance of a chronically worsened lymphatic drainage and tissue swelling due to the increased fibrosis, as we have found in the present study, supports the hypothesis that fibrosis is a key regulator of interstitial flow and lymphangiogenesis across the site of obstruction and within the swollen limb. They also suggest that reducing fibrosis during wound repair and radiation therapy, in place of or in addition to stimulating lymphangiogenesis, may be a viable therapeutic strategy to reduce the incidence of secondary lymphedema in humans.

GRANTS

This work was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant R15-HL-113954.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Author contributions: L.L.L., U.M., and J.G. conception and design of research; L.L.L., U.M., A.B.W., A.A.G., and R.J.G.I. performed experiments; L.L.L., U.M., A.B.W., A.A.G., R.J.G.I., and J.G. analyzed data; L.L.L., U.M., and J.G. interpreted results of experiments; L.L.L., U.M., and J.G. edited and revised manuscript; L.L.L., U.M., A.B.W., and J.G. approved final version of manuscript; U.M. and J.G. prepared figures; J.G. drafted manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Avraham T, Clavin NW, Daluvoy SV, Fernandes J, Soares MA, Corderio AP, Mehrara BJ. Fibrosis is a key inhibitor of lymphatic regneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 124: 438–450, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Avraham T, Daluvoy S, Zampell J, Yan A, Haviv YS, Rockson SG, Mehrara BJ. Blockade of transforming growth factor-β1 accelerates lymphatic regeneration during wound repair. Am J Pathol 177: 3202–3214, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Avraham T, Yan A, Zampell JC, Daluvoy SV, Haimovitz-Friedman AH, Cordeiro A, Mehrara BJ. Radiation therapy causes loss of dermal lymphatic vessels and interferes with lymphatic function by TGF-β1-mediated tissue fibrosis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299: C589–C605, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Avraham T, Zampell JC, Yan A, Elhadad S, Weitman ES, Rockson SG, Bromberg J, Mehrara BJ. Th2 differentiation is necessary for soft tissue fibrosis and lymphatic dysfunction resulting from lymphedema. FASEB J 27: 1114–1126, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bates DO. An interstitial hypothesis for breast cancer related lymphoedema. Pathophysiology 17: 289–294, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boardman KC, Swartz MA. Interstitial flow as a guide for lymphangiogenesis. Circ Res 92: 801–808, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clarke D, Martinez A, Cox RS. Analysis of cosmetic results and complications in patients with stage-I and stage-II breast-cancer treated by biopsy and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol 9: 1807–1813, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clavin NW, Avraham T, Fernandez J, Daluvoy SV, Soares MA, Chaudhry A, Mehrara BJ. TGF-β1 is a negative regulator of lymphatic regeneration during wound repair. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H2113–H2127, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Collette S, Collette L, Budiharto T, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, Struikmans H, Van den Bogaert W, Fourquet A, Jager JJ, Hoogenraad W, Mueller RP, Kurtz J, Morgan DA, Dubois JB, Salamon E, Mirimanoff R, Bolla M, Van der Hulst M, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, Bartelink H; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Predictors of the risk of fibrosis at 10 years after breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer–a study based on the EORTC trial 22881-10882 ‘boost versus no boost’. Eur J Cancer 44: 2587–2599, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Erickson VS, Pearson ML, Ganz PA, Adams J, Kahn KL. Arm edema in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 96–111, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goldman J, Conley KA, Raehl A, Bondy DM, Pytowski B, Swartz MA, Rutkowksi JM, Jaroch DB, Ongstad EL. Regulation of lymphatic capillary regeneration by interstitial flow in skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H2176–H2183, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hinrichs CS, Watroba NL, Rezaishiraz H, Giese W, Hurd T, Fassl KA, Edge SB. Lymphedema secondary to postmastectomy radiation: Incidence and risk factors. Ann Surg Oncol 11: 573–580, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeziorski A, Piekarski J, Berner A, Berner J. The problem of arm oedema after axillary dissection and/or radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 34: S53–S53, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kasper M, Barth K. Bleomycin and its role in inducing apoptosis and senescence in lung cells–modulating effects of caveolin-1. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 9: 341–353, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kissin MW, Querci della Rovere G, Easton D, Westbury G. Risk of lymphoedema following the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Surg 73: 580–584, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leak LV. The structure of lymphatic capillaries in lymph formation. Fed Proc 35: 1863–1871, 1976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mendez U, Brown EM, Ongstad EL, Slis JR, Goldman J. Functional recovery of fluid drainage precedes lymphangiogenesis in acute murine foreleg lymphedema. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302: H2250–H2256, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mendez U, Stroup EM, Lynch LL, Waller AB, Goldman J. A chronic and latent lymphatic insufficiency follows recovery from acute lymphedema in the rat foreleg. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 303: H1107–H1113, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mortimer PS. The pathophysiology of lymphedema. Cancer 83: 2798–2802, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mortimer PS, Bates DO, Brassington HD, Stanton AW, Strachan DP, Levick JR. The prevalence of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer. Qjm Mon J Assoc Phys 89: 377–380, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ogata F, Azuma R, Kikuchi M, Koshima I, Morimoto Y. Novel lymphography using indocyanine green dye for near-infrared fluorescence labeling. Ann Plast Surg 58: 652–655, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ogata F, Narushima M, Mihara M, Azuma R, Morimoto Y, Koshima I. Intraoperative lymphography using indocyanine green dye for near-infrared fluorescence labeling in lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 59: 180–184, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ongstad EL, Bouta EM, Roberts JE, Uzarski JS, Gibbs SE, Sabel MS, Cimmino VM, Roberts MA, Goldman J. Lymphangiogenesis-independent resolution of experimental edema. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299: H46–H54, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sevick-Muraca EM, Sharma R, Rasmussen JC, Marshall MV, Wendt JA, Pham HQ, Bonefas E, Houston JP, Sampath L, Adams KE, Blanchard DK, Fisher RE, Chiang SB, Elledge R, Mawad ME. Imaging of lymph flow in breast cancer patients after microdose administration of a near-infrared fluorophore: feasibility study. Radiology 246: 734–741, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sharma R, Wang W, Rasmussen JC, Joshi A, Houston JP, Adams KE, Cameron A, Ke S, Kwon S, Mawad ME, Sevick-Muraca EM. Quantitative imaging of lymph function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H3109–H3118, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Solito R, Alessandrini C, Fruschelli M, Pucci AM, Gerli R. An immunological correlation between the anchoring filaments of initial lymph vessels and the neighboring elastic fibers: a unified morphofunctional concept. Lymphology 30: 194–202, 1997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suami H, Pan WR, Taylor GI. The lymphatics of the skin filled by a dermal backflow: an observation in a scarred cadaver leg. Lymphology 40: 122–126, 2007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tammela T, Saaristo A, Holopainen T, Lyytikka J, Kotronen A, Pitkonen M, Abo-Ramadan U, Yla-Herttuala S, Petrova TV, Alitalo K. Therapeutic differentiation and maturation of lymphatic vessels after lymph node dissection and transplantation. Nat Med 13: 1458–1466, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ugur S, Arici C, Yaprak M, Mesci A, Arici GA, Dolay K, Ozmen V. Risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 11: 72–75, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Unno N, Inuzuka K, Suzuki M, Yamamoto N, Sagara D, Nishiyama M, Konno H. Preliminary experience with a novel fluorescence lymphography using indocyanine green in patients with secondary lymphedema. J Vasc Surg 45: 1016–1021, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uzarski J, Drelles MB, Gibbs SE, Ongstad EL, Goral JC, McKeown KK, Raehl AM, Roberts MA, Pytowski B, Smith MR, Goldman J. The resolution of lymphedema by interstitial flow in the mouse tail skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294: H1326–H1334, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Warren AG, Slavin SA. Scar lymphedema–fact or fiction? Ann Plast Surg 59: 41–45, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wernicke AG, Greenwood EA, Coplowitz S, Parashar B, Kulidzhanov F, Christos PJ, Fischer A, Nori D, Chao KS. Tissue compliance meter is a more reproducible method of measuring radiation-induced fibrosis than late effects of normal tissue-subjective objective management analytical in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective trial. Breast J 19: 250–258, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zampell JC, Avraham T, Yoder N, Fort N, Yan A, Weitman ES, Mehrara BJ. Lymphatic function is regulated by a coordinated expression of lymphangiogenic and anti-lymphangiogenic cytokines. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302: C392–C404, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zampell JC, Yan A, Avraham T, Daluvoy S, Weitman ES, Mehrara BJ. HIF-1α coordinates lymphangiogenesis during wound healing and in response to inflammation. FASEB J 26: 1027–1039, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES