Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2015 Mar 18;71(Pt 4):374–376. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015004831

Crystal structure of the co-crystal fac-tri­aqua­tris(thio­cyanato-κN)iron(III)–2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine (1/3)

Olesia I Kucheriv a,*, Sergii I Shylin a, Tetiana A Ilina b, Sebastian Dechert c, Il’ya A Gural’skiy a
PMCID: PMC4438839  PMID: 26029394

The FeIII complex located on a threefold rotation axis links with di­methyl­perazine mol­ecules via O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds,forming a three-dimensional supra­molecular framework.

Keywords: crystal structure, FeIII complex, iso­thio­cyanate ligand, pyrazine, co-crystal, hydrogen bonding

Abstract

In the crystal of the title compound, [Fe(NCS)3(H2O)3]·3C6H8N2, the FeIII cation is located on a threefold rotation axis and is coordinated by three N atoms of the thiocyanate anions and three water mol­ecules in a fac arrangement, forming a slightly distorted N3O3 octa­hedron. Stabilization within the crystal structure is provided by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds; the H atoms from coordinating water mol­ecules act as donors to the N atoms of guest 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine mol­ecules, leading to a three-dimensional supra­molecular framework.

Chemical context  

In the large family of coordination compounds, materials showing a tunable character of their physical properties (e.g., electrical, magnetic, optical etc) are of special inter­est. Attempts to design compounds with such tunability have revealed the possibility to target the property of inter­est through the rational choice of ligands in transition metal complexes. For instance, variation of the aromatic N-donor ligand can lead to possible spin-state modulation of transition metals. In certain cases, these complexes can even possess spin crossover behaviour (transition between low and high spin states of a metal). The phenomenon of spin transition, which is one of the most known examples of mol­ecular bis­tability, can be provoked by some external stimuli (temperature, pressure, light, magnetic field, absorption of some compounds) and is followed by a change of the optical, magnetic and electric properties (Gütlich & Goodwin, 2004). graphic file with name e-71-00374-scheme1.jpg

One of the simplest bridging N-donor ligands in the design of coordination polymers is pyrazine. This ligand is known for the formation of not only low-dimensional chains and sheets but also of some more complicated architectures, such as [Ag(pz)](CB11H12) [CB11H12 is the monocarba-closo-dodeca­borate(−) anion], which exhibits a three-dimensional structure made up of checkerboard sheets of silver cations and anions connected by pillars of bridging pyrazine ligands (Cunha-Silva et al., 2006). In addition, pyrazine is able to construct Hofmann clathrates – spin crossover compounds with general formula [FeII M II (pz)(CN)4] where M = Ni, Pd or Pt (Niel et al., 2001). A combination of pyrazine ligands with thiocyanates instead of tetracyanidometalates leads to the two-dimensional coordin­ation polymer [Fe(pz)2(NCS)2] with an anti­ferromagnetic exchange between the metal cations (Real et al., 1991). In this context, we attempted to synthesize an FeII thio­cyanate complex with 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine; however, the exposure of the starting material [Fe(OTs)2]·6H2O (OTs = p-toluene­sulfonate) to the oxygen in the air led to the oxidation of FeII and to the formation of the title compound.

Structural commentary  

In the crystal structure of the title compound, the FeIII cation is located on a threefold rotation axis and is in an octa­hedral coordination environment formed by three N atoms of the thio­cyanate anions and three O atoms of water mol­ecules arranged in a fac configuration (Fig. 1). The distance between the FeIII ion and the N atoms [2.025 (4) Å] is longer than that between the FeIII ion and the O atoms [2.034 (3) Å] and therefore the FeN3O3 octa­hedron is slightly distorted. These structural features are typical for related compounds (Shylin et al., 2013, 2015). The thio­cyanate ligands are bound through nitro­gen atoms and are quasi-linear [N1—C1—S1 = 179.5 (4)°], while the Fe–NCS linkages are bent [C1—N1—Fe1 = 157.0 (4)°]. Previously reported complexes with an N-bound NCS group possess similar structural features (Petrusenko et al., 1997).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) −y + 1, x − y + 1, z; (ii) −x + y, −x + 1, z.]

Supra­molecular features  

In the title compound, the crystal packing is stabilized by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Table 1): the H atoms from coordin­ating water mol­ecules act as donors to the N atoms of guest 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine mol­ecules. The compound contains three guest mol­ecules of pyrazine per FeIII cation. In the crystal lattice, each mol­ecule of the complex is attached to six mol­ecules of pyrazine, while each pyrazine is connected with two water mol­ecules of the host complexes, leading to the formation of a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ).

DHA DH HA D A DHA
O1H1AN2 0.80(3) 1.95(3) 2.745(4) 172(8)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystal structure of the title compound, showing hydrogen bonds as dashed lines. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity. Colour key: bronze Fe, yellow S, blue N, grey C and red O.

Synthesis and crystallization  

Crystals of the title compound were obtained by the slow-diffusion method between three layers, the first layer being a solution of [Fe(OTs)2]·6H2O (0.096 g, 0.2 mmol) and NH4SCN (0.046 g, 0.6 mmol) in water (10 ml), the second being a water/methanol mixture (1/1, 10 ml) and the third a solution of 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine (0.065 g, 0.6 mmol) in methanol (3 ml). After two weeks, red plates grew in the second layer; they were collected, washed with water and dried in air, yield 0.028 g (23%).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All hydrogen atoms connected to C and O atoms were placed in their expected calculated positions and refined as riding with C—H = 0.98 (CH3), 0.95 (Carom), O—H = 0.80 (3) Å, and with U iso(H) = 1.2U iso(C) with the exception of methyl hydrogen atoms, which were refined with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Fe(NCS)3(H2O)3]3C6H8N2
M r 608.57
Crystal system, space group Trigonal, R3c
Temperature (K) 133
a, c () 16.9383(12), 17.6259(13)
V (3) 4379.5(7)
Z 6
Radiation type Mo K
(mm1) 0.77
Crystal size (mm) 0.16 0.12 0.1
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Stoe IPDS II
Absorption correction Numerical (X-RED; Stoe Cie, 2002)
T min, T max 0.908, 0.939
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections 5784, 1903, 1716
R int 0.058
(sin /)max (1) 0.633
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.038, 0.070, 1.07
No. of reflections 1903
No. of parameters 120
No. of restraints 3
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3) 0.27, 0.28
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 685 quotients [(I +)(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter 0.03(3)

Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED (Stoe Cie, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004831/xu5840sup1.cif

e-71-00374-sup1.cif (127.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004831/xu5840Isup2.hkl

e-71-00374-Isup2.hkl (162.9KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1053032

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

SIS and IAG acknowledge DAAD fellowships and the hosting of Professor F. Meyer’s group.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Fe(NCS)3(H2O)3]·3C6H8N2 F(000) = 1902
Mr = 608.57 Dx = 1.384 Mg m3
Trigonal, R3c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.9383 (12) Å µ = 0.77 mm1
c = 17.6259 (13) Å T = 133 K
V = 4379.5 (7) Å3 Block, red
Z = 6 0.16 × 0.12 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDS II diffractometer 1716 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ scans and ω scans with κ offset Rint = 0.058
Absorption correction: numerical (X-RED; Stoe & Cie, 2002) θmax = 26.8°, θmin = 2.4°
Tmin = 0.908, Tmax = 0.939 h = −18→21
5784 measured reflections k = −21→15
1903 independent reflections l = −18→22

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.070 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0297P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1903 reflections Δρmax = 0.27 e Å3
120 parameters Δρmin = −0.28 e Å3
3 restraints Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 685 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Absolute structure parameter: −0.03 (3)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Fe1 0.3333 0.6667 0.99891 (7) 0.0201 (2)
S1 0.29300 (8) 0.86373 (8) 1.16318 (7) 0.0300 (3)
N1 0.2860 (3) 0.7347 (3) 1.0611 (2) 0.0297 (9)
O1 0.2256 (2) 0.62277 (19) 0.92686 (19) 0.0221 (6)
C1 0.2893 (3) 0.7891 (3) 1.1041 (3) 0.0238 (9)
N2 0.0562 (2) 0.5854 (2) 0.9750 (2) 0.0250 (8)
N3 −0.1220 (2) 0.5016 (2) 1.0276 (2) 0.0254 (8)
C2 0.0336 (3) 0.5471 (3) 1.0439 (3) 0.0299 (10)
H2 0.0796 0.5481 1.0753 0.036*
C3 −0.0543 (3) 0.5064 (3) 1.0704 (3) 0.0288 (10)
H3 −0.0674 0.4812 1.1201 0.035*
C4 −0.1008 (3) 0.5385 (3) 0.9586 (2) 0.0235 (9)
C5 −0.0099 (3) 0.5815 (3) 0.9318 (3) 0.0229 (9)
C6 −0.1766 (3) 0.5322 (3) 0.9107 (3) 0.0322 (10)
H6A −0.2345 0.4977 0.9379 0.048*
H6B −0.1795 0.5010 0.8630 0.048*
H6C −0.1655 0.5936 0.8996 0.048*
C7 0.0144 (3) 0.6246 (3) 0.8553 (3) 0.0304 (10)
H7A 0.0795 0.6484 0.8459 0.046*
H7B 0.0012 0.6747 0.8531 0.046*
H7C −0.0214 0.5791 0.8166 0.046*
H1A 0.179 (3) 0.617 (5) 0.943 (4) 0.080*
H1B 0.206 (5) 0.572 (3) 0.912 (4) 0.080*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Fe1 0.0197 (3) 0.0197 (3) 0.0209 (5) 0.00986 (13) 0.000 0.000
S1 0.0320 (6) 0.0293 (5) 0.0316 (6) 0.0175 (5) 0.0009 (5) −0.0061 (5)
N1 0.030 (2) 0.031 (2) 0.029 (2) 0.0157 (18) 0.0031 (17) −0.0024 (18)
O1 0.0180 (14) 0.0201 (14) 0.0283 (17) 0.0096 (13) −0.0011 (13) −0.0021 (13)
C1 0.022 (2) 0.030 (2) 0.022 (2) 0.0141 (18) 0.0019 (17) 0.0053 (18)
N2 0.0234 (18) 0.0234 (17) 0.028 (2) 0.0119 (15) −0.0004 (16) −0.0026 (15)
N3 0.0236 (17) 0.0233 (17) 0.029 (2) 0.0113 (15) 0.0027 (15) 0.0001 (15)
C2 0.027 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.030 (3) 0.019 (2) −0.0040 (19) −0.001 (2)
C3 0.032 (2) 0.029 (2) 0.028 (3) 0.018 (2) 0.0022 (19) 0.0030 (19)
C4 0.021 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.0113 (16) 0.0008 (18) −0.0022 (18)
C5 0.023 (2) 0.0203 (19) 0.027 (2) 0.0121 (17) 0.0023 (17) −0.0028 (17)
C6 0.027 (2) 0.036 (3) 0.035 (3) 0.017 (2) −0.002 (2) −0.002 (2)
C7 0.026 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.028 (3) 0.016 (2) 0.0020 (19) 0.0020 (19)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Fe1—N1 2.025 (4) N3—C4 1.333 (6)
Fe1—N1i 2.025 (4) C2—H2 0.9500
Fe1—N1ii 2.025 (4) C2—C3 1.372 (6)
Fe1—O1 2.034 (3) C3—H3 0.9500
Fe1—O1i 2.034 (3) C4—C5 1.415 (6)
Fe1—O1ii 2.034 (3) C4—C6 1.495 (6)
S1—C1 1.615 (5) C5—C7 1.491 (6)
N1—C1 1.172 (6) C6—H6A 0.9800
O1—H1A 0.80 (3) C6—H6B 0.9800
O1—H1B 0.80 (3) C6—H6C 0.9800
N2—C2 1.339 (6) C7—H7A 0.9800
N2—C5 1.329 (5) C7—H7B 0.9800
N3—C3 1.340 (6) C7—H7C 0.9800
N1—Fe1—N1i 93.42 (17) N2—C2—C3 121.9 (4)
N1—Fe1—N1ii 93.42 (17) C3—C2—H2 119.0
N1i—Fe1—N1ii 93.42 (16) N3—C3—C2 121.2 (5)
N1—Fe1—O1ii 90.67 (14) N3—C3—H3 119.4
N1ii—Fe1—O1ii 90.47 (14) C2—C3—H3 119.4
N1ii—Fe1—O1i 90.67 (14) N3—C4—C5 120.9 (4)
N1i—Fe1—O1ii 174.17 (17) N3—C4—C6 117.6 (4)
N1—Fe1—O1 90.47 (14) C5—C4—C6 121.5 (4)
N1i—Fe1—O1i 90.47 (14) N2—C5—C4 120.5 (4)
N1ii—Fe1—O1 174.17 (17) N2—C5—C7 118.3 (4)
N1i—Fe1—O1 90.67 (14) C4—C5—C7 121.2 (4)
N1—Fe1—O1i 174.17 (17) C4—C6—H6A 109.5
O1—Fe1—O1ii 85.15 (14) C4—C6—H6B 109.5
O1ii—Fe1—O1i 85.15 (14) C4—C6—H6C 109.5
O1—Fe1—O1i 85.15 (14) H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
C1—N1—Fe1 157.0 (4) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
Fe1—O1—H1A 118 (6) H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
Fe1—O1—H1B 115 (6) C5—C7—H7A 109.5
H1A—O1—H1B 98 (7) C5—C7—H7B 109.5
N1—C1—S1 179.5 (4) C5—C7—H7C 109.5
C5—N2—C2 117.7 (4) H7A—C7—H7B 109.5
C4—N3—C3 117.7 (4) H7A—C7—H7C 109.5
N2—C2—H2 119.0 H7B—C7—H7C 109.5
N2—C2—C3—N3 1.5 (7) C3—N3—C4—C6 179.4 (4)
N3—C4—C5—N2 0.4 (6) C4—N3—C3—C2 −0.7 (7)
N3—C4—C5—C7 −178.7 (4) C5—N2—C2—C3 −1.2 (6)
C2—N2—C5—C4 0.3 (6) C6—C4—C5—N2 −179.2 (4)
C2—N2—C5—C7 179.5 (4) C6—C4—C5—C7 1.7 (6)
C3—N3—C4—C5 −0.2 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) −y+1, xy+1, z; (ii) −x+y, −x+1, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1A···N2 0.80 (3) 1.95 (3) 2.745 (4) 172 (8)

References

  1. Cunha-Silva, L., Ahmad, R. & Hardie, M. J. (2006). Aust. J. Chem. 59, 40–48.
  2. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  3. Gütlich, P. & Goodwin, H. (2004). Spin Crossover in Transition Metal Compounds I, pp. 1–47. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  4. Niel, V., Martinez-Agudo, J. M., Muñoz, M. C., Gaspar, A. B. & Real, J. A. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 3838–3839. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Petrusenko, S. R., Kokozay, V. N. & Fritsky, I. O. (1997). Polyhedron, 16, 267–274.
  7. Real, J. A., De Munno, G., Munoz, M. C. & Julve, M. (1991). Inorg. Chem. 30, 2701–2704.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  10. Shylin, S. I., Gural’skiy, I. A., Bykov, D., Demeshko, S., Dechert, S., Meyer, F., Hauka, M. & Fritsky, I. O. (2015). Polyhedron, 87, 147–155.
  11. Shylin, S. I., Gural’skiy, I. A., Haukka, M. & Golenya, I. A. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, m280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Stoe & Cie (2002). X-RED and X-AREA. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.
  13. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004831/xu5840sup1.cif

e-71-00374-sup1.cif (127.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004831/xu5840Isup2.hkl

e-71-00374-Isup2.hkl (162.9KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1053032

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES