Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2015 Mar 14;71(Pt 4):371–373. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015004855

Serendipitous preparation of fac-(aceto­nitrile-κN)tri­chlorido­[(1,2,5,6-η)-cyclo­octa-1,5-diene]iridium(III)

David M Morris a, Joseph S Merola a,*
PMCID: PMC4438853  PMID: 26029393

An octa­hedral complex of iridium(III) with a chelating cyclo­octa-1,5-diene ligand, a facial arrangement of three chloride ligands and one aceto­nitrile ligand was isolated serendipitously from an attempted reaction between indene, the chlorido­cyclo­octa­dieneiridium dimer and HCl. Work-up that included use of aceto­nitrile solvent led to the formation of a few crystals of the title compound.

Keywords: crystal structure, iridium, cyclo­octa­diene, aceto­nitrile

Abstract

A reaction between [(COD)IrCl]2 (COD is cyclo­octa-1,5-diene), HCl and indene failed to provide the hoped for chlorido­indenyliridium dimer, but instead produced the title compound, [IrCl3(CH3CN)(C8H12)], which is an octa­hedral complex of iridium(III) with a chelating cyclo­octa-1,5-diene ligand, three chloride ligands in a fac arrangement, and one aceto­nitrile ligand. Attempts to devise a rational synthesis for the title compound were unsuccessful.

Chemical context  

We have published recently on the synthesis of a series of tetra­methyl­alkyl­cyclo­penta­dienyliridium complexes by the direct reaction between tetra­methyl­alkyl­cyclo­penta­diene and iridium chloride, giving the [Cp*RIrCl2]2 dimer (Morris et al., 2014). From the dimer, a variety of other compounds can be made, such as amino acid complexes, that have shown significant anti-mycobacterial activity (Karpin et al., 2013). Some of the reactions produced low yields of the chlorido-bridged dimer, thus limiting the number of products that could be made and tested. graphic file with name e-71-00371-scheme1.jpg

An alternate route to Cp*-type chlorido iridium dimers was reported using [(COD)IrCl]2 as the starting material (El Amouri et al., 1994) and, in our hands, this route does have promise for providing higher yields for many of the compounds. However, in the case of indene, there was no indication that an indenyl iridium complex had been prepared. Instead, a yellow–brown intra­ctable solid was formed. Several attempts to dissolve the solid and to separate products through fractional crystallization all failed. During the course of this work-up, one of the solvents used was aceto­nitrile. At some point, the product mixture was allowed to stand in solution, and after about 24 hours several very nicely shaped rectangular prisms had formed in the sample. These crystals were examined by X-ray crystallography and the results of that structure determination are reported here.

Structural commentary  

While the total number of cyclo­octa-1,5-diene complexes structurally characterized is quite large, the number that are directly comparable to the title compound is small. The title compound is a pseudo-octa­hedral complex of iridium with three chloride ligands occupying one face of the octa­hedron and the alkenes of the COD and the aceto­nitrile ligand occupying the opposite face (Fig. 1). Considering the varying ligands about the central iridium, there is very little distortion from ideal octa­hedral angles, with the most significant distortion being the N1—Ir1—Cl2 distorted away from the COD group with an angle of 164.05 (11)°. All other angles, including those involving the alkene centroids, deviate by no more than 5° from the ideal. All three Ir—Cl bond lengths are similar [range 2.3603 (11) to 2.3670 (11) Å], which is in keeping with both types of trans ligands, alkene and aceto­nitrile, being expected to be strong trans-influence ligands and would have a similar magnitude of effect on the chloride trans to either ligand.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.

The facial Ir—Cl distances may be contrasted with the average distance of 2.441 (2) Å for fac-[(Me3P)3IrCl3] (CCDC: 896073) and related compounds (Merola et al., 2013) that have somewhat longer Ir—Cl distances due to the effect of the trans PMe3 groups.

Choudhury et al. (2005) reported on a COD complex of iridium with three chlorides and a SnCl3 ligand completing the octa­hedral coordination about the central Ir atom (CCDC: 273475). In that case, though, the compound is a dinuclear one with Ir—Cl—Ir bridges. So, there are long Ir—Cl bonds (those involved in bridging) of 2.544 (4) Å and a shorter terminal Ir—Cl bond of 2.385 (6) Å. C=C bond lengths for the COD ring are similar to the title compound at 1.38 (1) and 1.41 (2) Å.

Supra­molecular features  

Although there appear to be some close C—H⋯Cl inter­molecular inter­actions, there are no important supra­molecular features to speak of in this structure.

Database survey  

A substructure search of the CCDC (Groom & Allen, 2014) for the 1,5-COD-Ir fragment resulted in over 850 hits. This is not a surprising result since [CODIrCl]2 is a convenient, high-yield organometallic starting material made in one step from IrCl3·H2O and cyclo­octa-1,5-diene (Crabtree & Morris, 1977). From [CODIrCl]2, a wide variety of ligand addition, chloride replacement or bridge-splitting reactions can be carried out, leading to a wide variety of compounds containing the COD chelate. Using Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), an analysis of the COD–Ir search of the database for structures with an octahedral coordination around the metal showed that the C=C bonds of the COD ligands ranged from 1.184 to 1.508 Å with a mean of 1.394 Å. For the title compound, the values of 1.392 (7) and 1.389 (6) Å are pretty much right at the mean for COD C=C bonds.

An analysis of the CCDC database (Groom & Allen, 2014) for octa­hedral iridium complexes with aceto­nitrile ligands uncovered 99 hits with Ir—N distances measuring from a minimum of 1.897 Å to a maximum of 2.246 Å with a mean of 2.068 Å. For the title compound, the Ir—N distance of 2.023 (4) Å places it just below the mean.

Synthesis and crystallization  

The title complex was formed as a few isolated crystals from an attempted reaction between [(COD)IrCl]2 and indene with HCl in an attempt to synthesize the [indenylIrCl2]2 dimer, which would have been a useful starting material for our studies. Unfortunately, this did not provide the desired product. The reaction produced some very intra­ctable solids. After multiple attempts to dissolve the solid in many different solvents, including aceto­nitrile, some well-shaped prisms formed on the side of the flask and these crystals were used in this investigation and were shown to be that of the title complex. Attempts to make this material in a rational fashion were not successful.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined as riding with C—H = 0.96–0.98 Å, and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) or 1.5U eq(Cmeth­yl).

Table 1. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [IrCl3(C2H3N)(C8H12)]
M r 447.78
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K) 100
a, b, c () 8.25131(10), 11.85605(14), 12.94150(15)
V (3) 1266.04(3)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo K
(mm1) 11.15
Crystal size (mm) 0.22 0.15 0.11
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Agilent Xcalibur Eos Gemini ultra
Absorption correction Analytical (SCALE3 ABSPACK; Clark Reid, 1995)
T min, T max 0.204, 0.396
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections 27207, 4333, 4173
R int 0.040
(sin /)max (1) 0.755
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.019, 0.038, 1.08
No. of reflections 4333
No. of parameters 137
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e 3) 1.07, 0.74
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 1715 quotients [(I +)(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter 0.011(4)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004855/pk2547sup1.cif

e-71-00371-sup1.cif (794.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004855/pk2547Isup2.hkl

e-71-00371-Isup2.hkl (237.6KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004855/pk2547Isup3.mol

CCDC reference: 1053035

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The open-access fee was provided by the Virginia Tech Open Access Subvention Fund.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[IrCl3(C2H3N)(C8H12)] Dx = 2.349 Mg m3
Mr = 447.78 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, P212121 Cell parameters from 12030 reflections
a = 8.25131 (10) Å θ = 4.0–32.2°
b = 11.85605 (14) Å µ = 11.15 mm1
c = 12.94150 (15) Å T = 100 K
V = 1266.04 (3) Å3 Prism, clear light orange
Z = 4 0.22 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm
F(000) = 840

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur Eos Gemini ultra diffractometer 4333 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source, Agilent Gemini System 4173 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.040
Detector resolution: 16.0122 pixels mm-1 θmax = 32.4°, θmin = 3.4°
ω scans h = −11→12
Absorption correction: analytical (SCALE3 ABSPACK; Clark & Reid, 1995) k = −17→17
Tmin = 0.204, Tmax = 0.396 l = −19→19
27207 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0124P)2 + 1.2315P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.038 (Δ/σ)max = 0.002
S = 1.08 Δρmax = 1.07 e Å3
4333 reflections Δρmin = −0.74 e Å3
137 parameters Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 1715 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
0 restraints Absolute structure parameter: −0.011 (4)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ir1 0.70199 (2) 0.47821 (2) 0.68347 (2) 0.01178 (4)
Cl1 0.68059 (17) 0.64680 (9) 0.78048 (9) 0.0238 (2)
Cl2 0.85370 (14) 0.58778 (9) 0.56587 (9) 0.0202 (2)
Cl3 0.47576 (13) 0.52459 (13) 0.57940 (9) 0.0275 (2)
N1 0.5308 (5) 0.4220 (3) 0.7828 (3) 0.0153 (7)
C1 0.7775 (6) 0.3484 (4) 0.5677 (3) 0.0210 (9)
H1 0.7227 0.3540 0.5008 0.025*
C2 0.6888 (7) 0.2940 (4) 0.6442 (3) 0.0210 (9)
H2 0.5813 0.2686 0.6219 0.025*
C3 0.7669 (7) 0.2197 (4) 0.7247 (4) 0.0268 (12)
H3A 0.8639 0.1863 0.6953 0.032*
H3B 0.6930 0.1587 0.7413 0.032*
C4 0.8132 (6) 0.2806 (4) 0.8253 (4) 0.0245 (9)
H4A 0.7241 0.2736 0.8737 0.029*
H4B 0.9063 0.2430 0.8553 0.029*
C5 0.8528 (5) 0.4040 (4) 0.8121 (4) 0.0202 (9)
H5 0.8518 0.4477 0.8764 0.024*
C6 0.9554 (6) 0.4463 (4) 0.7360 (4) 0.0229 (10)
H6 1.0132 0.5148 0.7568 0.028*
C7 1.0494 (6) 0.3734 (5) 0.6606 (4) 0.0289 (12)
H7A 1.0816 0.3048 0.6959 0.035*
H7B 1.1476 0.4132 0.6414 0.035*
C8 0.9592 (6) 0.3407 (4) 0.5616 (4) 0.0254 (11)
H8A 0.9963 0.3892 0.5061 0.030*
H8B 0.9885 0.2640 0.5437 0.030*
C9 0.4307 (5) 0.3980 (4) 0.8376 (3) 0.0174 (9)
C10 0.3017 (7) 0.3700 (4) 0.9097 (3) 0.0246 (9)
H10A 0.2025 0.4047 0.8874 0.037*
H10B 0.3294 0.3972 0.9773 0.037*
H10C 0.2879 0.2896 0.9120 0.037*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ir1 0.01257 (6) 0.01427 (6) 0.00849 (6) 0.00042 (6) 0.00024 (6) 0.00067 (6)
Cl1 0.0356 (7) 0.0166 (5) 0.0193 (5) −0.0010 (5) 0.0073 (5) −0.0029 (4)
Cl2 0.0229 (5) 0.0206 (5) 0.0170 (5) −0.0021 (4) 0.0046 (4) 0.0034 (4)
Cl3 0.0177 (5) 0.0456 (7) 0.0191 (5) 0.0062 (5) −0.0037 (4) 0.0099 (6)
N1 0.0216 (19) 0.0134 (17) 0.0110 (16) −0.0012 (14) −0.0036 (14) 0.0013 (13)
C1 0.027 (3) 0.022 (2) 0.014 (2) −0.002 (2) 0.0019 (19) −0.0038 (16)
C2 0.031 (2) 0.0162 (19) 0.0162 (19) −0.006 (2) 0.002 (2) −0.0054 (15)
C3 0.041 (3) 0.016 (2) 0.024 (2) 0.007 (2) 0.012 (2) 0.0051 (18)
C4 0.026 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.020 (2) 0.0060 (19) −0.001 (2) 0.0097 (19)
C5 0.0196 (19) 0.028 (2) 0.0133 (19) 0.0018 (16) −0.0060 (19) 0.006 (2)
C6 0.015 (2) 0.036 (3) 0.018 (2) 0.0004 (18) −0.0079 (17) 0.0053 (19)
C7 0.016 (2) 0.040 (3) 0.030 (3) 0.010 (2) 0.0045 (19) 0.009 (2)
C8 0.030 (3) 0.024 (2) 0.022 (2) 0.008 (2) 0.011 (2) −0.002 (2)
C9 0.0157 (19) 0.021 (2) 0.015 (2) −0.0023 (16) −0.0014 (15) −0.0035 (16)
C10 0.020 (2) 0.037 (3) 0.017 (2) −0.007 (2) 0.003 (2) −0.0031 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ir1—Cl1 2.3670 (11) C4—H4A 0.9700
Ir1—Cl2 2.3603 (11) C4—H4B 0.9700
Ir1—Cl3 2.3666 (10) C4—C5 1.509 (6)
Ir1—N1 2.023 (4) C5—H5 0.9800
Ir1—C1 2.236 (4) C5—C6 1.392 (7)
Ir1—C2 2.245 (4) C6—H6 0.9800
Ir1—C5 2.257 (5) C6—C7 1.517 (7)
Ir1—C6 2.231 (4) C7—H7A 0.9700
N1—C9 1.125 (6) C7—H7B 0.9700
C1—H1 0.9800 C7—C8 1.531 (8)
C1—C2 1.389 (6) C8—H8A 0.9700
C1—C8 1.504 (7) C8—H8B 0.9700
C2—H2 0.9800 C9—C10 1.454 (6)
C2—C3 1.510 (7) C10—H10A 0.9600
C3—H3A 0.9700 C10—H10B 0.9600
C3—H3B 0.9700 C10—H10C 0.9600
C3—C4 1.537 (7)
Cl2—Ir1—Cl1 85.23 (4) C2—C3—H3B 108.6
Cl2—Ir1—Cl3 85.61 (4) C2—C3—C4 114.6 (4)
Cl3—Ir1—Cl1 92.68 (5) H3A—C3—H3B 107.6
N1—Ir1—Cl1 83.63 (11) C4—C3—H3A 108.6
N1—Ir1—Cl2 164.05 (11) C4—C3—H3B 108.6
N1—Ir1—Cl3 83.55 (11) C3—C4—H4A 108.6
N1—Ir1—C1 113.18 (16) C3—C4—H4B 108.6
N1—Ir1—C2 77.86 (16) H4A—C4—H4B 107.6
N1—Ir1—C5 77.73 (16) C5—C4—C3 114.5 (4)
N1—Ir1—C6 113.88 (16) C5—C4—H4A 108.6
C1—Ir1—Cl1 163.18 (12) C5—C4—H4B 108.6
C1—Ir1—Cl2 78.41 (12) Ir1—C5—H5 114.5
C1—Ir1—Cl3 89.92 (14) C4—C5—Ir1 110.0 (3)
C1—Ir1—C2 36.12 (16) C4—C5—H5 114.5
C1—Ir1—C5 94.14 (18) C6—C5—Ir1 70.9 (3)
C2—Ir1—Cl1 159.73 (12) C6—C5—C4 124.1 (5)
C2—Ir1—Cl2 114.52 (12) C6—C5—H5 114.5
C2—Ir1—Cl3 93.37 (14) Ir1—C6—H6 113.6
C2—Ir1—C5 79.33 (18) C5—C6—Ir1 73.0 (3)
C5—Ir1—Cl1 88.79 (13) C5—C6—H6 113.6
C5—Ir1—Cl2 113.44 (12) C5—C6—C7 124.2 (5)
C5—Ir1—Cl3 160.95 (12) C7—C6—Ir1 112.4 (3)
C6—Ir1—Cl1 92.97 (14) C7—C6—H6 113.6
C6—Ir1—Cl2 78.03 (13) C6—C7—H7A 108.4
C6—Ir1—Cl3 162.18 (12) C6—C7—H7B 108.4
C6—Ir1—C1 79.97 (19) C6—C7—C8 115.7 (4)
C6—Ir1—C2 87.1 (2) H7A—C7—H7B 107.4
C6—Ir1—C5 36.15 (17) C8—C7—H7A 108.4
C9—N1—Ir1 175.1 (4) C8—C7—H7B 108.4
Ir1—C1—H1 114.7 C1—C8—C7 115.2 (4)
C2—C1—Ir1 72.3 (3) C1—C8—H8A 108.5
C2—C1—H1 114.7 C1—C8—H8B 108.5
C2—C1—C8 122.3 (5) C7—C8—H8A 108.5
C8—C1—Ir1 110.8 (3) C7—C8—H8B 108.5
C8—C1—H1 114.7 H8A—C8—H8B 107.5
Ir1—C2—H2 114.2 N1—C9—C10 178.4 (5)
C1—C2—Ir1 71.6 (3) C9—C10—H10A 109.5
C1—C2—H2 114.2 C9—C10—H10B 109.5
C1—C2—C3 122.5 (5) C9—C10—H10C 109.5
C3—C2—Ir1 113.0 (3) H10A—C10—H10B 109.5
C3—C2—H2 114.2 H10A—C10—H10C 109.5
C2—C3—H3A 108.6 H10B—C10—H10C 109.5
Ir1—C1—C2—C3 −106.1 (4) C3—C4—C5—Ir1 32.7 (5)
Ir1—C1—C8—C7 27.6 (5) C3—C4—C5—C6 −47.3 (6)
Ir1—C2—C3—C4 10.1 (6) C4—C5—C6—Ir1 101.7 (4)
Ir1—C5—C6—C7 −105.8 (4) C4—C5—C6—C7 −4.2 (7)
Ir1—C6—C7—C8 3.1 (6) C5—C6—C7—C8 87.1 (6)
C1—C2—C3—C4 92.3 (5) C6—C7—C8—C1 −20.8 (7)
C2—C1—C8—C7 −54.0 (6) C8—C1—C2—Ir1 103.8 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −29.0 (6) C8—C1—C2—C3 −2.3 (7)

References

  1. Agilent (2014). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England.
  2. Choudhury, J., Podder, S. & Roy, S. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 6162–6163. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Clark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887–897.
  4. Crabtree, R. H. & Morris, G. E. (1977). J. Organomet. Chem. 135, 395–403.
  5. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  6. El Amouri, H., Gruselle, M. & Jaouén, G. (1994). Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 24, 395–400.
  7. Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Karpin, G., Merola, J. S. & Falkinham, J. O. (2013). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 3434–3436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  10. Merola, J. S., Franks, M. A. & Frazier, J. F. (2013). Polyhedron, 54, 67–73.
  11. Morris, D. M., McGeagh, M., De Peña, D. & Merola, J. S. (2014). Polyhedron, 84, 120–135.
  12. Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004855/pk2547sup1.cif

e-71-00371-sup1.cif (794.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004855/pk2547Isup2.hkl

e-71-00371-Isup2.hkl (237.6KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004855/pk2547Isup3.mol

CCDC reference: 1053035

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES