Skip to main content
Molecular Medicine Reports logoLink to Molecular Medicine Reports
. 2015 Mar 26;12(1):1066–1074. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3551

Effects of OsteoKing on osteoporotic rabbits

LIFEN DAI 1,2,3,*, HAIYING WU 4,*, SHAN YU 2,*, HONGBIN ZHAO 4, LANJIE XUE 5, MING XU 2, ZHIQIANG SHEN 1,, MIN HU 2,
PMCID: PMC4438876  PMID: 25815520

Abstract

Heng-Gu-Gu-Shang-Yu-He-Ji, also known as OsteoKing, is used as a herbal Traditional Chinese Medicine for the treatment of bone disease, including femoral head necrosis and osteoarthritis. However, whether OsteoKing has anti-osteoporotic properties has remained to be elucidated. The purpose of the present study was therefore to investigate the effects of OsteoKing on ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rabbits. Female New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into an ovariectomized (OVX) group and a sham-surgery group. The rabbits in the OVX group were subjected to an ovariectomy, while the rabbits in the sham group were subjected to the removal of an area of fat near the two ovaries. Bone mineral density, mechanical properties, serum biochemical parameters and micro-architecture were examined at 150 days post-OVX to characterize the experimental animal model. Once the osteoporotic rabbit model had been established, the rabbits in the OVX group were divided into the following groups: Model group, nilestriol group and 300 and 600 mg/kg OsteoKing groups, containing 16 rabbits in each group. OsteoKing and nilestriol were administered orally. The bone mineral density, mechanical properties, serum biochemical parameters, histology and micro-architecture were examined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric analysis, mechanical assessments, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, histopathological evaluation and micro-computerized tomography examination following 60 days and 120 days of treatment, respectively. Treatment with OsteoKing led to an elevation in the bone mineral density of the vertebra and serum phosphorus levels, reduced serum concentrations of osteocalcin, procollagen type I N-terminal peptide, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b and cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen, improved mechanical properties (maximum load, stiffness and energy absorption capacity), and micro-architecture of the lumbar vertebra in the OVX osteoporotic rabbit model following treatment for 120 days. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that OsteoKing is effective in the prevention of estrogen deficiency-associated bone loss and may be a promising drug for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Keywords: micro-computerized tomography, ovariectomy, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, Heng-Gu-Gu-Shang-Yu-He-Ji, OsteoKing

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a chronic, metabolic and systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and micro-architectural deterioration, resulting in increased bone fragility and fracture risk (1,2). It is estimated that >200 million individuals worldwide suffer from osteoporosis and the prevalence is continuing to increase with the growing elderly population (3). The incidence of osteoporosis is 2–4 times higher in females than that in males due to a sharp decrease in ovarian estrogen production, which causes rapid bone loss during the first decade following the menopause (4). Bone fracture, which is the most serious consequence of osteoporosis, is associated with high economic costs and substantial morbidity and mortality; therefore, the prevention and treatment of this condition are of great importance (5). Current drug treatments for the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis include estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin and bisphosphonates (4,6,7). Although these agents are effective in preventing bone loss, they are not the ideal treatments due to their adverse side effects on the breast and the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular systems, as well as increasing the risk of endometrial or ovarian cancer (4,812). Novel drugs based on medicinal herbs and natural products, and which possess fewer side effects, are urgently required (13). Traditional Chinese Medicines have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis, and as these medicines are prepared from medicinal plants, are a source of numerous bioactive compounds and are preferred by patients, they are more suitable for long-term use compared with chemically synthesized medicines (14).

Heng-Gu-Gu-Shang-Yu-He-Ji (OsteoKing) is a formulation composed of numerous types of medicinal herbs (Pericarpium Citri reticulatae, Carthamus tinctorius L., Radix notoginseng, Eucommia ulmoides Oliv., Radix ginseng, Radix Astragali Mongolici and Carapax trionycis) based on a concoction originating from Yunnan Province in China and has been used for >100 years. It has a notable effect in the treatment of bone diseases, particularly for femoral head necrosis, prolapse of the lumbar intervertebral disc and osteoarthritis, and was approved by the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration in 2002 (15,16). Previous studies by our group demonstrated that OsteoKing is able to elevate the gene expression of core binding factor α 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor, and improve the micro-architecture in the necrotic femoral head of rabbits (1720). Clinical studies have demonstrated that OsteoKing has an effect in preventing fracture and treating ischemic necrosis of the femoral head in humans (2123). However, no studies have been performed thus far to investigate whether OsteoKing has any anti-osteoporotic activity. The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of OsteoKing on an osteoporosis model of ovariectomized (OVX) rabbits.

Materials and methods

Drugs and reagents

The OsteoKing concoction was prepared according to the Chinese Pharmacopeia (China Pharmacopeia Committee, 2002) and was supplied by Crystal Natural Pharmaceutical Co. (Kunming, China). Briefly, Pericarpium Citri reticulatae (10 g), Carthamus tinctorius L. (15 g), Radix Notoginseng (30 g), Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. (30 g), Radix Ginseng (20 g), Radix Astragali mongolici (40 g) and Carapax Trionycis (10 g) were ground into a coarse powder and immersed in 10X (10 l/kg) distilled water for 12 h at room temperature, and then boiled using a distillation apparatus for 1 h. This process was repeated twice and for the second and third extraction, the residue from the previous extraction was filtered and the same extraction procedures were applied. Thereafter, the combined extracts were filtrated and evaporated using a rotary evaporator at 50°C to a relative density of 1.03–1.04 g/cm3, centrifuged for 30 min at 1,450 × g and the supernatant obtained was centrifuged once again after standing for 12 h. Subsequently, the pH was adjusted to 4.0–6.0 using NaOH (Shaihai Experiment Co., Shanghai, China), distilled water was added to a total volume of 1,000 ml and the product was filtrated prior to usage. Nilestriol was purchased from Shanghai New Hualian Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Rabbit enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for measurement of the serum concentrations of osteocalcin (OC), procollagen type I N-terminal peptide (PINP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b), cross linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) with a sensitivity of 0.3 ng/ml, 0.2 ng/ml, 19.5 μU/ml and 0.78 pmol/ml, respectively, were purchased from Wuhan Huamei Bioengineering Co. (Wuhan, China), and the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variability of all the ELISA kits were <8 and 10%, respectively.

Animals

A total of 101 female New Zealand white rabbits aged 6 months were obtained from the Animal Center of Kunming Medical University (Kunming, China). Their body weight ranged between 2.5 and 3.0 kg. The animals were housed at a constant temperature (20–25°C), humidity (40–70%) and light-dark cycle (12/12 h). Tap water was available ad libitum, while standard rabbit chow was restricted to 50 g per day. All experiments were conducted under the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Ethics Committee (Animal Care and Use Committee) of Kunming Medical University. All efforts were made to minimize the pain and suffering of the animals.

Experimental protocol

Following a two-week acclimation period, the animals were randomly allocated into an OVX model group (OVX group, n=76) and a sham-surgery group (sham group, n=25). Animals of the OVX group underwent a bilateral ovariectomy as previously described under general anesthesia with an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg; Shanghai Westang Bio-tech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), while the sham surgery group was subjected to a procedure involving exposure of the ovaries without excision (24). Post-operatively, all animals (Animal Center of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China) fasted for 12 h and sodium benzylpenicillin (0.3 million IU/kg; Wuhan Dahua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) was administered via an intramuscular injection for five days to prevent infection (25). However, one rabbit from the sham surgery group and two rabbits from the OVX group died within 150 days following surgery. To characterize the experimental animal model, six animals from each group were selected randomly 150 days following OVX to determine the BMD of their vertebrae, serum biochemical parameters, mechanical properties and micro-architecture of the lumbar vertebra. Once the osteoporotic rabbit model was established, 16 rabbits from the sham group were randomly selected to continue with the study, and 64 rabbits from the OVX group were randomly divided into four groups: Model group (Model), OVX with nilestriol group (nilestriol), OVX with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing group (OsteoKing 300) and OVX with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing (OsteoKing 600) group, containing 16 rabbits each. OsteoKing was administered orally once every other day with the dose at 300 mg/kg approximating the clinical application dose for humans (19,20). Nilestriol (Shanghai Hualian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg once weekly (26,27). Rabbits of the sham group and model group were treated with deionized water. All animals were weighed and the doses were adjusted weekly. At 60 days and 120 days after treatment, six randomly selected rabbits from each group were sacrificed and the effects of OsteoKing or nilestriol on the BMD of the vertebrae, serum biochemical parameters and mechanical properties, histology, and micro-architecture of the lumbar vertebra were recorded.

BMD analysis

The rabbits were anesthetized with an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) and the BMD of the vertebrae was measured in vivo using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar Prodigy Advance; GE Lunar, Madison, WI, USA) as described previously (22) Specific software for small animals (GE Medical Systems, enCORE 2004 software; cersion 8.80.001) was used. BMD measurements were performed following 150 days bilateral ovariectomy (0 days treatment) and 60, 120 days treatment, respectively.

Mechanical assessment

The second lumbar vertebra was harvested at days 0, 60 and 120 of treatment, frozen at −20°C prior to the assay and the mechanical properties were measured as described previously (25,28). The bones were thawed at room temperature prior to the mechanical assessments and moisture levels were retained with the use of a moist gauze soaked in 0.9% NaCl solution (The Third Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China) throughout the entire assessment period. The vertebrae were prepared by cutting off the end plates from the vertebral body to create parallel planar surfaces using a diamond wafer saw (VT1200, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar,, Germany). The vertebral samples were then placed centrally between two parallel steel plates attached to a materials-testing machine (Instron System 5565; Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) and assessed along the longitudinal axis at a constant compressive speed of 1 mm/min (25,29). The specimens were loaded until the specimen succumbed to the strain/weight and the mechanical parameters (maximum load, displacement, stiffness and energy absorption capacity) were calculated from the load-displacement curves. Briefly, the maximum load (N) was considered as the maximum force on the curve; furthermore, displacement (mm) and the ultimate deformity prior to failure and stiffness (N/mm) were determined from the slope of the linear portion, and the area under the load-displacement curve was defined as the energy absorption capacity (mJ) (28,30).

Biochemical analysis of serum

Blood samples were collected from the central ear artery 150 days following bilateral ovariectomy (day 0 of treatment) and at days 60 and 120 of treatment, respectively, after an overnight fast, consistently between 09:00 and 11:00 A.M. The serum was promptly separated and stored at −80°C prior to the assay (31). The serum calcium (Ca2+) and inorganic phosphorus (P) levels were determined using a biochemical automatic analyzer (Hitachi 7080; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the serum concentrations of OC, PINP, TRAP5b and NTX were measured using rabbit ELISA kits. All samples were run in the same assay unless an individual value required repeating.

Histopathological evaluation

The sections of the third lumbar vertebrae, which were harvested 60 or 120 days following treatment, were prepared as described previously (32,33). Briefly, samples were fixed in 10% neutral formal-saline (Day Ning Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Jining, Shandong, China) for five days, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and embedded in paraffin following decalcification in 10% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (Kunming Pegatron Yang Technology Co., Ltd., Kunming, China) for 30 days. Subsequently, the blocks were cut into 5-μm slices perpendicular to the longitudinal axis at the middle of the lumbar vertebra. The morphology of the sections was examined under a light microscope (Nikon AZ100; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) following staining with hematoxylin and eosin (Wuhan Baihao Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan,China).

Micro-computerized tomography (MicroCT) examination

The first lumbar vertebra, which was harvested 150 days after the bilateral ovariectomy (day 0 of treatment) and 60 days or 120 days after treatment was cleaned of adherent soft tissues and preserved in sealed plastic bags at −20°C prior to the assay (34). The MicroCT examination of the first lumbar vertebra was performed using a MicroCT system (μ CT 80, SCANCO Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) as previously described (34,35), and the analytical conditions were 55 kV with 72 μA leakage. The lumbar vertebra was scanned and ~500 transverse consecutive sections of 35-μm thickness were obtained from each lumbar vertebra using a 2048×2048 matrix. The volume of interest was selected as a region 100 slices subsequent to 50 slices away from the cranial endplate (36). Within these slices, the region of the vertebral body, excluding the cortical bone by the boundaries defined by the endocortical bone surfaces, was selected and constructed three-dimensionally. Following setting the same threshold, the structural parameters, including bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), bone surface/bone volume (BS/BV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular number (Tb.N) were measured automatically for each specimen using the plate-model data with the SCANCO microtomographic software package version 6.0 (SCANCO Medical) (35).

Statistical analysis

All experimental data were assessed using the statistical system SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences in the mean values of BMD, serum biochemical parameters, mechanical parameters and structural parameters between the two groups 150 days after OVX were compared using an independent-samples t-test, and those between five groups at the same time -point after treatment were performed using one-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

BMD measurements

The effects of OsteoKing or nilestriol on the BMD of the vertebrae are presented in Table I. The BMD of the vertebra in the OVX group 150 days after the surgery decreased by 14.0% (P<0.01) compared with that in the sham group. No significant differences were observed in the BMD between any treatment group and the model group 60 days after treatment (P>0.05). At 120 days of treatment, the BMD in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing was significantly higher than that in the model group (P<0.01), almost identical to that in the sham group and similar to that in the OVX with nilestriol group, while the improvement of BMD in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing was not significant (P>0.05).

Table I.

Effect of OsteoKing or nilestriol on bone mineral density (g/cm2) of vertebrae in ovariectomized rabbits.

Time-point (days) Sham group Ovariectomized group
Model nilestriol OsteoKing 300 OsteoKing 600
0 0.265±0.016 0.228±0.017a
60 0.264±0.026 0.225±0.014a 0.245±0.011 0.238±0.011 0.248±0.017
120 0.262±0.021 0.227±0.015a 0.262±0.011b 0.249±0.011 0.266±0.018b

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=6).

a

P<0.01 vs. sham group;

b

P<0.01 vs. model group. OsteoKing 300/600, ovariectomized and treated with 300/600 mg/kg OsteoKing every other day.

Mechanical properties of the lumbar vertebrae

The results of the vertebral compression assessment are shown in Table II. The values of maximum load, displacement, stiffness and energy in the OVX group 150 days after surgery decreased by 44.7, 6.8, 44.3 and 50.3%, respectively, compared with those in the sham group (P<0.01, P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.01, respectively). At 60 days following treatment, the values of maximum load and stiffness were significantly higher in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing than those in the model group (P<0.05), but remained significantly lower than those in the sham group (P<0.05). The values of maximum load and stiffness were also significantly higher in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing than those in the model group (P<0.01), and no significant difference was identified (P>0.05) compared with the sham group with the exception of the energy levels (P<0.05). Following 120 days of treatment, the values of maximum load, stiffness and energy were significantly higher in the OsteoKing-treated group than those in the model group (P<0.01 or P<0.05), and no difference was identified compared with those in the sham group (P>0.05). Similar gradual increases in maximum load, stiffness and energy were observed in nilestriol-treated group. No significant difference was observed in the value of displacement between any groups at any time-point of treatment (P>0.05).

Table II.

Effect of OsteoKing or nilestriol on biomechanical parameters of the second lumbar vertebra in ovariectomized rabbits.

Time-point (days) Group Maximum load (N) Displacement (mm) Stiffness (N/mm) Energy (mJ)
0 Sham 615.8±61.7 0.676±0.013 1504.0±125.3 208.4±42.5
OVX 340.6±67.6b 0.630±0.035a 837.7±229.1b 103.5±24.5b
60 Sham 611.6±64.6 0.678±0.015 1498.5±97.6 201.1±39.1
Model 336.5±64.6b 0.615±0.047 826.3±220.6b 96.5±23.9b
Nilestriol 499.4±61.7d 0.618±0.036 1259.1±173.4d 135.6±25.8b
OsteoKing 300 474.2±69.1a,c 0.621±0.041 1153.9±148.3a,c 127.3±19.2b
OsteoKing 600 515.5±65.9d 0.639±0.051 1267.2±152.6d 144.5±26.3a
120 Sham 615.3±44.7 0.670±0.017 1489.1±79.2 197.2±35.7
Model 331.8±61.9b 0.612±0.043 819.0±221.8b 92.8±23.5b
Nilestriol 573.9±46.6c 0.624±0.031 1422.8±104.4d 164.3±28.4d
OsteoKing 300 548.3±60.4c 0.625±0.058 1406.2±120.4d 158.5±30.5a
OsteoKing 600 589.3±55.0c 0.634±0.052 1467.1±102.1d 170.7±42.4d

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=6).

a

P<0.05,

b

P<0.01 vs. sham group;

c

P<0.05,

d

P<0.01 vs. model group. OsteoKing 300/600, ovariectomized and treated with 300/600 mg/kg OsteoKing every other day.

Serum biochemical parameters

The results of the serum biochemical assessment are shown in Table III. The levels of OC (+37.6%), PINP (+56.9%), TRAP5b (+45.2%) and NTX (+40.0%) were significantly higher (P<0.01) and the levels of serum Ca2+ (P<0.05) and P (P<0.01) were markedly lower in the model group than those in the sham group 150 days after the surgery, indicating the induction of a high bone turnover following OVX. No significant difference was identified in the serum Ca2+ levels among the groups at the same time-points. Following 60 days of treatment, the levels of OC, PINP, TRAP5b and NTX decreased by 8.6, 8.3, 10.0 and 16.2%, respectively, in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing, and decreased by 16.4, 20.6, 18.7 and 22.2%, respectively, in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing as compared with those in the model group at 150 days after OVX; however, the decrease in the levels of all bone turnover biomarkers in the OsteoKing-treated groups was not significantly different compared with those in the model group at the same time-point (P>0.05). The levels of serum P in the group subjected to OVX and treated with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing were significantly higher (P<0.05) than those in the model group. At 120 days following treatment, compared with those in the model group at the same time-point, the levels of OC, PINP, TRAP5b and NTX in the OsteoKing-treated group decreased significantly and the levels of serum P increased significantly, almost recovering to the normal levels. Nilestriol treatment had a similar effect to the two doses of OsteoKing in reducing bone turnover and increasing serum P levels.

Table III.

Effect of OsteoKing or nilestriol on serum biochemical parameters in OVX rabbits.

Time-point (days) Group Ca2+ (mmol/l) P (mmol/l) OC (ng/ml) PINP (ng/ml) TRAP5b (mU/ml) NTX (pmol/ml)
0 Sham 3.43±0.07 1.59±0.10 7.47±1.19 2.16±0.52 5.98±0.85 7.62±0.92
OVX 3.29±0.12a 1.26±0.13b 10.28±1.12b 3.39±0.71b 8.68±1.17b 10.67±1.05b
60 Sham 3.41±0.10 1.59±0.13 7.53±0.93 2.11±0.60 6.01±1.29 7.50±0.91
Model 3.34±0.14 1.28±0.15b 10.05±1.45a 3.36±0.60a 8.59±0.92b 10.45±1.51b
Nilestriol 3.38±0.10 1.57±0.12c 8.41±1.46 2.72±0.80 6.89±0.95 8.18±1.34
OsteoKing 300 3.36±0.16 1.48±0.18 9.40±1.52 3.11±0.49 7.81±1.06 8.94±1.44
OsteoKing 600 3.37±0.14 1.56±0.12c 8.59±1.38 2.69±0.73 7.06±1.15 8.30±1.26
120 Sham 3.41±0.10 1.58±0.11 7.45±0.90 2.06±0.56 5.81±0.95 7.54±0.90
Model 3.33±0.08 1.29±0.09b 9.79±1.22b 3.26±0.77a 8.30±1.27b 10.26±1.25b
Nilestriol 3.41±0.10 1.58±0.09d 7.63±0.83c 1.88±0.46c 5.67±0.61c 7.56±0.82d
OsteoKing 300 3.39±0.09 1.58±0.10d 8.35±0.93 2.22±0.84 6.26±0.89c 8.22±1.05c
OsteoKing 600 3.40±0.14 1.59±0.08d 7.75±1.16c 2.05±0.63c 5.58±0.77c 7.55±1.47d

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=6).

a

P<0.05,

b

P<0.01 vs. sham group;

c

P<0.05,

d

P<0.01 vs. model group. OsteoKing 300/600, ovariectomized and treated with 300/600 mg/kg OsteoKing every other day. OVX, ovariectomized; OC, osteocalcin; PINP, procollagen type I N-terminal peptide; TRAP5b, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b; NTX, cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen.

Histological analysis of lumbar vertebrae

Under the light microscope, following 60 and 120 days of treatment, the histology of the third lumbar vertebra of the sham group exhibited the normal size, shape, density and architecture of the trabecular bone (Figs. 1A and 2A), while sections of the OVX group exhibited sparse, disrupted, spacing-enlarged and area-diminished trabecular bone tissue (Figs. 1B and 2B). The OsteoKing-treated group exhibited partial trabecular restoration following 60 days of treatment (Fig. 1D and E) and exhibited almost complete restoration of normal architecture following 120 days of treatment (Fig. 2D and E); similar effects were also observed in the nilestriol treatment group (Figs. 1C and 2C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photomicrograph of the third lumbar vertebra following 60 days of treatment (hematoxylin and eosin stain; magnification, ×40). (A) Sham group; (B) Model group; (C) OVX with nilestriol group; (D) OVX with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing group; (E) OVX with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing group. OVX, ovariectomized.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photomicrograph of the third lumbar vertebra following 120 days of treatment (hematoxylin and eosin stain; magnification, ×40). (A) Sham group; (B) Model group; (C) OVX with nilestriol group; (D) OVX with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing group; (E) OVX with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing group. OVX, ovariectomized.

MicroCT evaluation

At 150 days after ovariectomy, the rabbits of the OVX group exhibited lower values for BV/TV, Tb.Th and Tb.N, and higher values for BS/BV and Tb.Sp (P<0.01), when compared with those in the sham group (Table IV and Fig 4). Treating OVX rabbits with OsteoKing (300 or 600 mg/kg) or nilestriol partly abrogated the OVX-mediated changes in the abovementioned parameters, resulting in levels similar to those in the sham group (Table IV). Typical three-dimensional reconstructed MicroCT images of the first lumbar vertebra (Figs. 3, 4 and 5), including the cortical bone, revealed differences in trabecular micro-architecture among the various groups. Images of the representative samples with the BV/TV closest to the mean BV/TV were reconstructed in each group (32).

Table IV.

Effect of OsteoKing or nilestriol on the micro-architecture parameters of the first lumbar vertebra in ovariectomized rabbits.

Time-point (days) Group BV/TV (%) BS/BV (1/mm) Tb.Th (mm) Tb.Sp (mm) Tb.N (1/mm)
0 Sham 0.385±0.052 6.161±0.312 0.325±0.017 0.891±0.053 1.178±0.102
Ovariectomized 0.193±0.048b 7.489±0.454b 0.268±0.016b 1.278±0.075b 0.713±0.130b
60 Sham 0.386±0.047 6.269±0.298 0.320±0.015 0.866±0.080 1.203±0.093
Model 0.200±0.043b 7.405±0.334b 0.271±0.012b 1.244±0.093b 0.735±0.129b
Nilestriol 0.291±0.049a,c 6.784±0.457 0.296±0.020 1.018±0.099d 0.977±0.102a,c
OsteoKing 300 0.268±0.046b 6.928±0.411 0.290±0.017 1.070±0.123a 0.922±0.118b
OsteoKing 600 0.295±0.046b 6.668±0.411c 0.301±0.019c 1.038±0.096c 0.975±0.099a,d
120 Sham 0.387±0.042 6.173±0.265 0.324±0.014 0.864±0.081 1.190±0.098
Model 0.198±0.041b 7.512±0.368b 0.267±0.013b 1.254±0.089b 0.737±1.122b
Nilestriol 0.348±0.051d 6.319±0.283d 0.317±0.014d 0.862±0.111d 1.096±0.124d
OsteoKing 300 0.314±0.053d 6.623±0.440d 0.303±0.020d 0.906±0.106d 1.034±0.126d
OsteoKing 600 0.345±0.060d 6.383±0.356d 0.314±0.018d 0.879±0.098d 1.094±0.132d

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=6).

a

P<0.05,

b

P<0.01 vs. sham group;

c

P<0.05,

d

P<0.01 vs. model group. OsteoKing 300/600, ovariectomized and treated with 300/600 mg/kg OsteoKing every other day. BV/TV, bone volume/total volume; BS/BV, bone surface/bone volume; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.N, trabecular number.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Three-dimensional reconstruction using micro-computerized tomography of the first lumbar vertebra following 60 days of treatment. (A) Sham group; (B) Model group; (C) OVX with nilestriol group; (D) OVX with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing group; (E) OVX with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing group. OVX, ovariectomized.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Three-dimensional reconstruction using micro-computerized tomography of the first lumbar vertebra 150 days after OVX. (A) Sham group; (B) OVX group. OVX, ovariectomized.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Three-dimensional reconstruction using micro-computerized tomography of the first lumbar vertebra following 120 days of treatment. (A) Sham group; (B) Model group; (C) OVX with nilestriol group; (D) OVX with 300 mg/kg OsteoKing group; (E) OVX with 600 mg/kg OsteoKing group. OVX, ovariectomized.

Discussion

OsteoKing is a Traditional Chinese Medicine, which is widely used in the treatment of bone disease, particularly for femoral head necrosis, prolapse of the lumbar intervertebral disc and osteoarthritis. Previous studies have demonstrated that OsteoKing has an effect on the prevention of fracture and the improvement of the micro-architecture in the necrotic femoral head of rabbits, which indicates that OsteoKing may have anti-osteoporotic effects (17,18,21,23). The present study was the first, to the best of our knowledge, to demonstrate the beneficial effects of OsteoKing against the reduction of bone mass and bone strength, and the deterioration of the micro-architecture of the bone induced by ovariectomy in rabbits.

Experimental animal models are important in improving knowledge of the aetiology, pathophysiology and diagnosis of osteoporosis, as well as in the prevention of the condition and development of therapeutics (2). It is well known that estrogen deficiency is an important risk factor in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and estrogenic deprivation has been the most commonly used experimental model of osteoporosis in animals (33,37). Although the ovariectomy rat model is the most frequently used animal model of osteoporosis, rats do not experience a natural menopause, fail to achieve true skeletal maturity, lack the Haversian system and remodeling differs from that in humans (3841). By contrast, rabbits have a short developmental period and fast bone turnover, achieve skeletal maturity shortly after reaching complete sexual development at ~six months of age, and exhibit an active Haversian remodeling; therefore, rabbits are often selected for the investigation of osteoporosis (25,37,41). Osteoporotic rabbit models induced by OVX or glucocorticoid (GC) alone and OVX combined with GC have been used to investigate the effects of loss of bone mass and have exhibited promising results of reductions of BMD (24,25,37,42,43). In the present study, six-month-old rabbits underwent bilateral ovariectomy alone (without GC administration), and after 150 days, the BMD of the vertebrae in the OVX group decreased by 14.0%, which was significantly lower compared with that in the sham group (P<0.01). Furthermore, a significant reduction of mechanical strength in the vertebral load compression assessments and micro-architectural deterioration of the lumbar vertebra were observed in rabbits of the OVX group. The osteoporotic rabbit model induced by OVX was successfully established after a longer period than that reported in previous studies (24,25,28,37,38).

Bone turnover markers reflect the rates of bone resorption and bone formation in the whole body, and they provide a representative index of the overall skeletal bone loss (4447). Estrogen deficiency following a natural or artificial menopause results in an increase in the levels of markers of bone remod-eling and bone turnover (48). Previous studies on menopausal women demonstrated that the increase in the markers of bone resorption (of 50–150%) is rapid and precedes the increase (of 50–100%) in markers of bone formation by several months. This imbalance and disproportionately high rate of bone resorption compared with formation exists within several years following ovariectomy and remains in late postmenopausal women (4850). Similar changes were observed in the present study: 150 days after ovariectomy, the expression of OC and PINP, which are the biomarkers of bone formation, increased by 37.6 and 56.9% respectively, and TRAP5b and NTX, which are biomarkers of bone resorption, increased by 45.2 and 40.0%, respectively, as compared with those in the sham group. Following treatment with OsteoKing, the levels of all the above bone turnover biomarkers returned to a normal level and the rate of decrease in bone resorption markers was slightly faster, which indicated that OsteoKing may prevent bone loss by suppressing bone resorption. However, long-term suppression of bone turnover may eventually lead to an accumulation of fatigue-induced damage, as was observed following bisphosphonate treatment (51,52). Therefore, although the levels of bone turnover biomarkers returned to normal levels, it was important to measure the mechanical properties and micro-architecture of bone.

Compression testing of the lumbar vertebrae is recommended for the assessment of the mechanical properties of cancellous bone (28). The biomechanical definition of bone fragility includes at least three components: Strength (maximum load), brittleness (reciprocal of the displacement) and work to failure (energy absorption) (25,52). A fourth biomechanical measure, stiffness, is also used to assess the mechanical integrity of bone, but is not a direct measure of fragility (52). In the present study, the strength, brittleness, stiffness and energy absorption of the lumbar vertebrae decreased significantly in the OVX group compared with that in the sham group 150 days after ovariectomy. Following OsteoKing treatment, the strength, stiffness and energy absorption increased gradually and almost recovered to normal levels, but no effect on the brittleness was observed. This was consistent with a previous study, which demonstrated that it was rare for a treatment to improve strength and decrease brittleness simultaneously (53).

Previous studies have demonstrated that BMD and the aspects of the trabecular micro-architecture affect trabecular bone strength (53). In the present study, the BMD of the vertebrae decreased significantly and deteriorated micro-architecture was observed in the MicroCT analysis of the lumbar vertebrae 150 days after OVX. Increased vertebral BMD and trabecular restoration of the lumbar vertebrae were observed following OsteoKing treatment by the DXA and histopathological evaluation, respectively. Furthermore, MicroCT analysis demonstrated an increased travbecular BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N and decreased BS/BV, Tb.Sp following treatment with OsteoKing compared with those in the model group. These results were consistent with the consequences of the mechanical assessment and previous studies, which indicated that the suppression of bone turnover did not lead to bone damage (52).

In conclusion, OsteoKing was able to elevate the BMD of the vertebrae, reduce the bone turnover rate, restore the trabecular network and ameliorate the mechanical properties of lumbar vertebra in a rabbit model of ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis. These findings suggested that OsteoKing is potentially useful in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, which occurs in women as a result of estrogen deficiency.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no’s. 81060361, 30660212, 81160401 and 30860389), the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (no’s. 2008CC009, 2004C0044 M, 2010ZC169, 2012fa002 and 2012HB043), the Department of Education, Yunnan Province (no. ZD2012006) and the Natural Science Foundation of Kunming City (no. 0S090202. 2012-01-01-A-R-07-0006).

References

  • 1.Du Z, Chen J, Yan F, Xiao Y. Effects of simvastatin on bone healing around titanium implants in osteoporotic rats. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:145–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lasota A, Danowska-Klonowska D. Experimental osteoporosis - different methods of ovariectomy in female white rats. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2004;49(Suppl 1):129–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reginster JY, Burlet N. Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone. 2006;38(Suppl 1):S4–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shirke SS, Jadhav SR, Jagtap AG. Methanolic extract of Cuminum cyminum inhibits ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2008;233:1403–1410. doi: 10.3181/0803-RM-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Canalis E, Giustina A, Bilezikian JP. Mechanisms of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:905–916. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra067395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grey A, Reid IR. Emerging and potential therapies for osteoporosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2005;14:265–278. doi: 10.1517/13543784.14.3.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lane NE, Kelman A. A review of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;5:214–222. doi: 10.1186/ar797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dominguez LJ, Scalisi R, Barbagallo M. Therapeutic options in osteoporosis. Acta Biomed. 2010;81(Suppl 1):55–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lacey JV, Jr, Mink PJ, Lubin JH, Sherman ME, Troisi R, Hartge P, Schatzkin A, Schairer C. Menopausal hormone replacement therapy and risk of ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2002;288:334–341. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reginster JY, Sarlet N. The treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of current and emerging therapeutic options. Treat Endocrinol. 2006;5:15–23. doi: 10.2165/00024677-200605010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J, Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Salari Sharif P, Abdollahi M, Larijani B. Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31:289–300. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1586-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Putnam SE, Scutt AM, Bicknell K, Priestley CM, Williamson EM. Natural products as alternative treatments for metabolic bone disorders and for maintenance of bone health. Phytother Res. 2007;21:99–112. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng M, Wang Q, Fan Y, Liu X, Wang L, Xie R, Ho CC, Sun W. A traditional Chinese herbal preparation, Er-Zhi-Wan, prevent ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;138:279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen XQ, Wang QQ, Li JM, Wang YQ, Zhang XZ, Li K. Comparison of simultaneous distillation and extraction, static headspace and headspace-solid phase microextraction coupled with GC/MS to measure the flavour components of Tricholoma matsutake. Asian J Chem. 2013;25:6059–6063. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fan L, Ma J, Chen YH, Chen XQ. Antioxidant and antimicrobial phenolic compounds from Setaria viridis. Chem Nat Comp. 2014;50:433–437. doi: 10.1007/s10600-014-0979-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hu M, Zhao H, Dong X, Luo D, Zhou X. General and light microscope observation on histological changes of femoral heads between SANFH rabbit animal models and it were intervened by Osteoking. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2010;35:2912–2916. In Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hu M, Zhao HB, Qian CY, Wei W, Xu HH, Tang W, Luo DJ, Zhang Y. Ultrastructural evaluation of the SANFH rabbit animal models intervened by Osteoking. Zhong Hua Zhong Yi Yao Za Zhi. 2011;26:486–489. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao HB, Hu M, Liang HS. Experimental study on osteoking in promoting gene expression of core binding factor alpha 1 in necrotic femoral head of rabbits. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2006;26:1003–1006. In Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhao HB, Hu M, Wang WQ, Li LZ. Effects of the VEGF gene expressions of Osteoking in the treatment of femoral head necrosis. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2007;20:757–759. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luo DJ, Zhao HB, Dong XL, Li LZ, Wang WZ, Xiong H. The study on treatment of vertebral ostoporotic fracture by salmon calcitonin and Heng Gu bong healing reagent. Chin J Endocr Surg. 2011;5:158–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao HB, Wang B, Zhao XL, Li LZ, Li SH, Li YG, Chen ZY, Luo XR. Osteoking in the treatment of ischemic necrosis of femoral head: long-term results in 76 patients. Chin J Pract Chin Modern Med. 2004;4:2906–2907. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao HB, Hu M, Zheng HY, Liang HS, Zhu XS. Clinical study on effect of Osteoking in preventing postoperational deep venous thrombosis in patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Chin J Integr Med. 2005;11:297–299. doi: 10.1007/BF02835793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Castañeda S, Largo R, Calvo E, Rodríguez-Salvanés F, Marcos ME, Díaz-Curiel M, Herrero-Beaumont G. Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:34–41. doi: 10.1007/s00256-005-0022-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu X, Lei W, Wu Z, Cui Y, Han B, Fu S, Jiang C. Effects of glucocorticoid on BMD, micro-architecture and biomechanics of cancellous and cortical bone mass in OVX rabbits. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cao DP, Zheng YN, Qin LP, Han T, Zhang H, Rahman K, Zhang QY. Curculigo orchioides, a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, prevents bone loss in ovariectomized rats. Maturitas. 2008;59:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nian H, Qin LP, Zhang QY, Zheng HC, Yu Y, Huang BK. Antiosteoporotic activity of Er-Xian Decoction, a traditional Chinese herbal formula, in ovariectomized rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;108:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baofeng L, Zhi Y, Bei C, Guolin M, Qingshui Y, Jian L. Characterization of a rabbit osteoporosis model induced by ovariectomy and glucocorticoid. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:396–401. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.483986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schorlemmer S, Ignatius A, Claes L, Augat P. Inhibition of cortical and cancellous bone formation in glucocorticoid-treated OVX sheep. Bone. 2005;37:491–496. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Akhter MP, Cullen DM, Gong G, Recker RR. Bone biome-chanical properties in prostaglandin EP1 and EP2 knockout mice. Bone. 2001;29:121–125. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Scholz-Ahrens KE, Delling G, Stampa B, Helfenstein A, Hahne HJ, Acil Y, Timm W, Barkmann R, Hassenpflug J, Schrezenmeir J, Glüer CC. Glucocorticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in adult primiparous Göttingen miniature pigs: effects on bone mineral and mineral metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;293:E385–395. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00627.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arens AM, Barr B, Puchalski SM, Poppenga R, Kulin RM, Anderson J, Stover SM. Osteoporosis associated with pulmonary silicosis in an equine bone fragility syndrome. Vet Pathol. 2011;48:593–615. doi: 10.1177/0300985810385151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang Y, Yu L, Ao M, Jin W. Effect of ethanol extract of Lepidium meyenii Walp. on osteoporosis in ovariectomized rat. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;105:274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen H, Wu M, Kubo KY. Combined treatment with a traditional Chinese medicine, Hachimi-jio-gan (Ba-Wei-Di-Huang-Wan) and alendronate improves bone micro-structure in ovariectomized rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;142:80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hordon LD, Itoda M, Shore PA, Shore RC, Heald M, Brown M, Kanis JA, Rodan GA, Aaron JE. Preservation of thoracic spine microarchitecture by alendronate: comparison of histology and microCT. Bone. 2006;38:444–449. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao FD, Pollintine P, Hole BD, Adams MA, Dolan P. Vertebral fractures usually affect the cranial endplate because it is thinner and supported by less-dense trabecular bone. Bone. 2009;44:372–379. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Castañeda S, Calvo E, Largo R, González-González R, de la Piedra C, Díaz-Curiel M, Herrero-Beaumont G. Characterization of a new experimental model of osteoporosis in rabbits. J Bone Miner Metab. 2008;26:53–59. doi: 10.1007/s00774-007-0797-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bellido M, Lugo L, Castañeda S, Roman-Blas JA, Rufián-Henares JA, Navarro-Alarcón M, Largo R, Herrero-Beaumont G. PTH increases jaw mineral density in a rabbit model of osteoporosis. J Dent Res. 2010;89:360–365. doi: 10.1177/0022034510363082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mosekilde L. Assessing bone quality-animal models in preclinical osteoporosis research. Bone. 1995;17(Suppl):343S–352S. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00312-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rodgers JB, Monier-Faugere MC, Malluche H. Animal models for the study of bone loss after cessation of ovarian function. Bone. 1993;14:369–377. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Turner AS. Animal models of osteoporosis - necessity and limitations. Eur Cells Mater. 2001;1:66–81. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v001a08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cao T, Shirota T, Ohno K, Michi KI. Mineralized bone loss in partially edentulous trabeculae of ovariectomized rabbit mandibles. J Periodontal Res. 2004;39:37–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2004.00703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cao T, Shirota T, Yamazaki M, Ohno K, Michi KI. Bone mineral density in mandibles of ovariectomized rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:604–608. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chaki O, Yoshikata I, Kikuchi R, Nakayama M, Uchiyama Y, Hirahara F, Gorai I. The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in postmenopausal Japanese women. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:1537–1544. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eastell R, Colwell A, Hampton L, Reeve J. Biochemical markers of bone resorption compared with estimates of bone resorption from radiotracer kinetic studies in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:59–65. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Markers of bone turnover predict postmenopausal forearm bone loss over 4 years: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1614–1621. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.9.1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Whitaker M, Guo J, Kehoe T, Benson G. Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis - where do we go from here? N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2048–2051. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1202619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Delmas PD, Eastell R, Garnero P, Seibel MJ, Stepan J, Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporosis Int. 2000;11(Suppl 6):S2–S17. doi: 10.1007/s001980070002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD. Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:337–349. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650110307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Szulc P, Delmas PD. Biochemical markers of bone turnover: potential use in the investigation and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1683–1704. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0660-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Armamento-Villareal R, Napoli N, Panwar V, Novack D. Suppressed bone turnover during alendronate therapy for high-turnover osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2048–2050. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc062268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Turner CH. Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:97–104. doi: 10.1007/s001980200000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bouxsein Ml. Determinants of skeletal fragility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:897–911. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES