Table 2.
Peptide | MIC [μm]a | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
B. subtilis | S. epidermidis | E. coli | E. aerogenes | |
Anoplin | 4 | 8 | 16 | >32 |
DAH–anoplin | 2 | 16 | 8 | >32b |
GGH–anoplin | 2 | 8 | 4 | >32b |
VIH–anoplin | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 32[b] |
PAP | 0.5 | 4 | 1 | >32 |
DAH–PAP | 0.25 | 4 | 0.25 | >32b |
GGH–PAP | 0.125 | 1 | 0.125 | >32b |
VIH–PAP | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 32[b] |
sh-Buforin | 8 | 8 | 32 | >32 |
DAH–sh-buforin | 2 | 4 | 16 | >32b |
GGH–sh-buforin | 4 | 16 | 16 | >32b |
VIH–sh-buforin | 2 | 8 | 8 | >32b |
Data are the mode of three independent experiments. Mann–Whitney test was used to compared these results with those of the parental AMP; numbers in bold correspond to P≤0.05; all other results are not statistically significant.
Chi-square (Χ2) test was performed due to presence of ties.