Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 May 21;3(3):e00444-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00444-15

Draft Genome Sequence of Sporidiobolus salmonicolor CBS 6832, a Red-Pigmented Basidiomycetous Yeast

Marco A Coelho a,, João M G C F Almeida a, Chris Todd Hittinger b, Paula Gonçalves a
PMCID: PMC4440948  PMID: 25999568

Abstract

We report the genome sequencing and annotation of the basidiomycetous red-pigmented yeast Sporidiobolus salmonicolor strain CBS 6832. The current assembly contains 395 scaffolds, for a total size of about 20.5 Mb and a G+C content of ~61.3%. The genome annotation predicts 5,147 putative protein-coding genes.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The carotenoid-producing yeast Sporidiobolus salmonicolor belongs to the order Sporidiobolales (1), which is classified in the subphylum Pucciniomycotina, the earliest branching lineage of Basidiomycota (2). This species is recognized mainly as a phyllosphere yeast and is free-living and distributed worldwide. It has been recovered from a broad spectrum of substrates, including fresh and marine water, soil, and even clinical samples (3). This species has a research interest from the perspective of the evolution of sexual reproduction in basidiomycetes (46) and has the potential to serve as a natural source of carotenoids (7) for pharmaceutical, cosmetics, and food industries (8, 9). Here we report the genome sequencing of S. salmonicolor strain CBS 6832, isolated as a contaminant of a clinical sample (10), using a combination of Illumina and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing technologies. For Illumina sequencing, 0.4-kb paired-end and 2- to 5-kb mate-pair libraries were generated and sequenced using the GAIIx and HiSeq 2000 platforms, respectively. For PacBio sequencing, a 10-kb SMRTbell library was generated and sequenced on a PacBio RS II platform. Illumina sequencing data were pre-processed by Trimmomatic version 0.32 (11). In short, adapter sequences were removed and low-quality bases were trimmed at the end of the reads and when the average quality was below a defined quality threshold (Phred score <20, using a sliding window approach). The de novo hybrid assembly of Illumina and PacBio data was performed using SPAdes version 3.1 assembler (12) with parameters “careful” and “K 35,55,65,77.” PacBio circular consensus sequences (CCS) were used as unpaired single reads, and contiguous long reads (CLR) were used for gap closure and repeat resolution. The accuracy of the resulting assembly was evaluated with REAPR (13), which uses read pairs mapped to the initial assembly to pinpoint misassemblies, such as scaffolding inaccuracies. The final draft assembly consists of 395 scaffolds (165 of which are above 500 bp), for a total size of 20,549,402 bp (N50, 538 kb) and a G+C content of about 61.3% as assessed by QUAST (14). Genes were predicted using Maker version 2.10 (15) with RepBase version 19.5 (16), SNAP, and Augustus trained on the Rhodosporidium toruloides NP11 model (PRJNA169538). Protein-coding sequences were annotated using the SIMAP database (17), as of late May 2014. Overall, we predicted 5,147 putative protein-coding genes. These encompass 798 superfamilies (18); 4,019 genes fall into 2,198 PANTHER families, of which 3,031 were annotated to the subfamily level (19). The most represented families are involved in transport, carbohydrate metabolism, regulation, and steroid metabolism. About 21% of the annotated proteins display a putative transmembrane region, 477 of which present four or more of these regions. A total of 1,031 genes exhibit coiled-coils signs in their products, suggesting involvement in protein–protein interactions (20). About 220 of the proteins present an identifiable signal peptide and are expected to be secreted (21, 22).

This genome will enable direct access to genes encoding enzymes with potential biotechnological applications and foster comparative genomics studies to elucidate fundamental biological processes, such as the evolution of sexual reproduction in fungi.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The genome of S. salmonicolor strain CBS 6832 has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers CENE01000001 to CENE01000395. The version described in this paper is the first version.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mark Johnston for providing access to an Illumina GAIIx instrument at the University of Colorado School of Medicine.

This work was supported by grant PTDC/BIA-GEN/112799/2009 from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal. M.A.C. holds a post-grant (SFRH/BPD/79198/2011) from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant nos. DEB-1253634 and DEB-1442148 and funded in part by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE Office of Science BER DE-FC02-07ER64494). C.T.H. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences, supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Footnotes

Citation Coelho MA, Almeida JMGCF, Hittinger CT, Gonçalves P. 2015. Draft genome sequence of Sporidiobolus salmonicolor CBS 6832, a red-pigmented basidiomycetous yeast. Genome Announc 3(3):e00444-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00444-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sampaio JP, Gadanho M, Bauer R, Weiss M. 2003. Taxonomic studies in the Microbotryomycetidae: Leucosporidium golubevii sp. nov., Leucosporidiella gen. nov. and the new orders Leucosporidiales and Sporidiobolales. Mycol Prog 2:53–68. doi: 10.1007/s11557-006-0044-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aime MC, Toome M, McLaughlin D. 2014. The Pucciniomycotina, p 271–294. In McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW (ed), Systematics and evolution: the mycota, vol. VII, part A. Springer, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sampaio JP. 2011. Sporidiobolus Nyland, p 1549–1562. In Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (ed), The yeasts: a taxonomic study, vol. 3, 5th ed., vol. 3, part Vb. Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coelho MA, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. 2011. Evidence for maintenance of sex determinants but not of sexual stages in red yeasts, a group of early diverged basidiomycetes. BMC Evol Biol 11:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coelho MA, Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. 2010. A deviation from the bipolar-tetrapolar mating paradigm in an early diverged basidiomycete. PLoS Genet 6:e1001052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kües U, James TY, Heitman J. 2011. Mating type in basidiomycetes: unipolar, bipolar, and tetrapolar patterns of sexuality, p 97–160. In Pöggele S, Wöstemeyer J (ed), Evolution of fungi and fungal-like organisms, vol. 6 Springer, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Colet R, Di Luccio M, Valduga E. 2015. Fed-batch production of carotenoids by Sporidiobolus salmonicolor (CBS 2636): kinetic and stoichiometric parameters. Eur Food Res Technol 240:173–182. doi: 10.1007/s00217-014-2318-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Frengova GI, Beshkova DM. 2009. Carotenoids from Rhodotorula and Phaffia: yeasts of biotechnological importance. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:163–180. doi: 10.1007/s10295-008-0492-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmidt-Dannert C, Umeno D, Arnold FH. 2000. Molecular breeding of carotenoid biosynthetic pathways. Nat Biotechnol 18:750–753. doi: 10.1038/77319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Misra VC, Randhawa HS. 1976. Sporobolomyces salmonicolor var. fischerii, a new yeast. Arch Microbiol 108:141–143. doi: 10.1007/BF00425104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hunt M, Kikuchi T, Sanders M, Newbold C, Berriman M, Otto TD. 2013. REAPR: a universal tool for genome assembly evaluation. Genome Biol 14:R47. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Holt C, Yandell M. 2011. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinformatics 12:491. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. 2005. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:462–467. doi: 10.1159/000084979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arnold R, Rattei T, Tischler P, Truong MD, Stümpflen V, Mewes W. 2005. SIMAP—the similarity matrix of proteins. Bioinformatics 21(Suppl 2):ii42–ii46. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gough J, Karplus K, Hughey R, Chothia C. 2001. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol 313:903–919. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, Diemer K, Muruganujan A, Narechania A. 2003. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res 13:2129–2141. doi: 10.1101/gr.772403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. 1991. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252:1162–1164. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL. 2004. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol 338:1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES