Abstract
Adhesion of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to the extracellular matrix (ECM) may influence differentiation potential and cell fate decisions. Here we investigated the inductive role of binding of integrin α6β1 expressed in mouse (m)ESCs to laminin-1 (LN1) in mediating the differentiation of ESCs to endothelial cells (ECs). We observed that α6β1 binding to LN1 was required for differentiation to ECs. α6β1 functioned by recruiting the adaptor tetraspanin protein CD151, which activated FAK and Akt signaling and mediated the EC lineage-specifying transcription factor Er71. In contrast, association of the ESC-expressed α3β1, another highly expressed LN1 binding integrin, with CD151, prevented α6β1-mediated differentiation. CD151 thus functioned as a bifurcation router to direct ESCs towards ECs when α6β1 associated with CD151, or prevented transition to ECs when α3β1 associated with CD151. These observations were recapitulated in mice in which α6 integrin or CD151 knockdown reduced the expression of Er71-regulated angiogenesis genes and development of blood vessels. Thus, interaction of α6β1 in ESCs with LN1 activates α6β1/CD151 signaling which programs ESCs towards the EC lineage fate.
Keywords: integrins, laminin-1, stem cells, tetraspanins, stem cell endothelial differentiation, gene regulation
INTRODUCTION
Interactions of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins with integrins and downstream activation of signaling pathways regulate cellular processes as diverse as cell motility, cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, and cell polarity [1,2]. It is known that binding of fibroblasts and other cell types to ECM activates “outside-in” signals depending on the specific matrix protein on which cells are adherent [3–5]. However, the role of integrin-ECM interactions in programming of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to specific cell fates is not well understood [6,7]. While ESCs have the potential to differentiate into endothelial cells (ECs) [8–11], the contribution of specific ECM proteins and the signaling mechanisms responsible for EC differentiation and lineage specification remain incompletely understood [12–17].
Studies have shown that ECs emerge from ESCs upon applying mesodermal differentiating conditions [18–20]. The generated ECs are characterized by upregulation of Fetal liver kinase-1 (Flk1) gene and EC-specific adherens junction VE-cadherin gene [21–25]. Differentiation towards the EC fate also requires activation of specific transcriptional factors such as Er71/Etv2, which binds Flk1 and VE-cadherin promoters [21–25]. In addition, growth factors such as BMP-4 (bone morphogenetic protein 4) and VEGF are also important cues for the transition towards ECs [21,22].
Here we investigated the role of the ESC-expressed integrins α3β1 and α6β1 in mediating the differentiation to ECs. Studies focused on the question whether ESCs grown on laminin-1 (LN1) could be coaxed into transitioning into ECs, and if so, the signaling mechanisms responsible, and whether the generated ECs were capable of forming blood vessels. Laminins are a prominent ESC niche [26,27] in developmental vasculogenesis [28]. Since differentiation of ECs may recapitulate the vascular differentiation program [20,25], we surmised that ESC-expressed α3β1 and α6β1 interacting with LN1 are important in generating ECs capable of forming functional blood vessels. LN1 binding integrins, in addition to binding ECM proteins, also associate with the adaptor protein CD151, known as the 4-pass transmembrane protein tetraspanin-4 (TMSF4), which regulates signaling downstream of integrin activation [29–35]. As CD151 interacting with α3β1 or α6β1 [30–35] is capable of directing signaling towards distinct pathways [30–34], we also investigated the role of CD151 through binding with either α3β1 or α6β1 in the mechanism of transition of ESCs to ECs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Immunofluorescence Staining and Microscopy
These assays were performed as described [20,36]. Briefly, mESCs were fixed with 4% PFA, permeabilized, and stained with rat anti-mouse α6, rabbit anti-mouse CD151, or goat anti-mouse α3 antibodies. Frozen sections were stained with rat anti-mouse Er71. Paraffin sections were stained for Hematoxylin/Eosin (H/E). Fluorescent images were acquired at room temperature with a Zeiss LSM 710 META confocal laser scanning microscope using an α-Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.46NA, (1.5x zoom factor) or a C-Apochromat 63x/1.2NA objective, (2.6x Zoom factor). The Zeiss Zen software was used for image acquisition. Co-localization was analyzed using ImageJ (NIH) with the Fiji plug-in coloc_2 [37].Background subtraction was performed to eliminate nonspecific staining. The calculation of the fractions of CD151 that overlapped with integrins was performed using thresholded Mander’s coefficient. H/E images were taken by an Olympus BX51microscope with an Olympus 12.5MP DP71 CCD camera using a UPlanFL N dry 40X/0.75NA objective. Super Resolution imaging was performed at Northwestern University Cell Imaging Facility using Delta Vision-OMX Super Resolution Fluorescent Microscope (supported by NIH Grant S10OD010777, Thomas J. Hope).
Cell Surface Integrin Internalization Assays
Internalization of α6 integrin was determined by cell surface biotinylation assay. Cell surface biotinylation experiments have been previously described [35,36]. In brief, cells were plated (5×105) on 35mm dishes coated with 0.2µg/ml LN-1. The cells were washed with cold PBS and incubated with reducible sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL). To strip the biotin bound to surface proteins, the cells were treated for 30min on ice with a reducing solution containing 42mM glutathione (reduced form), 75mM NaCl, 75mM NaOH, and 1% BSA (called quencher). Some dishes were left untreated to measure the total amount of labeled integrin. For α6 integrin co-IP, the cells were solubilized in 1% Brij-99 and 150mM NaCl lysis buffer at 4°C. Cell surface biotinylated integrins were analyzed by streptavidin-HRP, subjected to chemiluminescence (ECL), and signals were quantitated by densitometric analysis. Alternatively, to determine cell surface α6 integrin, mESCs were washed with cold PBS and then incubated with various concentrations of trypsin (1–100U/ml in PBS) at RT. To stop digestion, 1mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) was added, cells washed and lysed in Brij-99+150mM NaCl lysis buffer. For immunoblotting, anti−α6 antibody recognizing an extracellular domain of α6 (α6-ecto) or anti−α6 antibody recognizing the cytoplasmic C-terminal (α6-cyto, clone H-87, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-10730) region of the integrin were used.
Transfection Experiments
Transfection with α6 siRNA, CD151 siRNA and α3 siRNA was performed in 24-well plates using pooled specific mouse integrin α6 siRNA (Dharmacon, Thermo Scientific, Accell SmartPool mouse Itga6, E-040204-00-0005, Accell SmartPool mouse cd151, E-043064-00–0005, Accell SmartPool mouse Itga3, E-042246-00–0005) and a non-targeting control siRNA (Dharmacon, Thermo Scientific, Accell non-targeting Control Pool, D-001910-10-05) (25nM final concentration). The mESCs were transfected in triplicate for 24hr in the presence of serum free media, and then 500µl of complete growth media was added per well for another 24 hr. Then, the transfection mix was replaced with fresh growth media, and protein expression analysis was performed. Transfection with dominant-negative-Akt (HA-Akt DN, [K179M], Addgene plasmid 16243) and with Gst-Er71 (vector pGEX-4T1, provided by Dr. C. Park) was performed using Lipofectin Transfection Reagent (Life Technologies™).
RESULTS
LN1 interaction with mESC-expressing α6β1 induces differentiation towards EC fate
Integrin subunits α6 and β1 were predominantly expressed transcripts in mESCs (Figure S1A). Flow cytometry analysis verified high cell surface expression of α6 and β1 (Figure 1A). In contrast, β4, another α6 binding partner, was not seen (Figure 1B). mESC adhesion to LN1, but not to control gelatin matrix, was significantly reduced using anti-α6 blocking antibody (clone GoH3) (Figure 1C). We determined whether binding of α6β1 to LN1 regulated the differentiation of mESCs to ECs as compared to differentiation on type IV collagen. mESC were plated at low density on either type IV collagen or LN1 in presence of defined EC differentiation medium containing VEGF165 [20]. Cells seeded at similar densities (3×103 cells/cm2) under both conditions expressed Flk1 and VE-cadherin on day#3 with levels peaking on day#6–7. Importantly, differentiation on LN1 was significantly more efficient with 25% of cells on LN-1 becoming Flk1+VE-cadherin+ compared to only 8% double positive cells on type IV collagen (Figure 1D).
We next examined the consequences of inhibiting α6 expression on mESC differentiation (Figure S1B). α6 knockdown was associated with significantly impaired proliferation (Figure 1E) and increased apoptosis (Figure 1F) consistent with a prominent role of α6 in ESC maintenance [17]. To avoid confounding effects of apoptosis in these experiments, we used a blocking antibody against α6 (clone GoH3). In pilot experiments we employed a range of doses of the α6 blocking antibody determining, for each particular dose, the activation status of α6β1 as reflected by the decrease in the mean fluorescence intensity of the activation dependent antibody against β1, clone 9EG7 [39] (i.e. % β1 inhibition, Figure S1C). At an antibody dosage inducing α6β1 inhibition of 40%, mESCs did not undergo apoptosis (Figure S1D); importantly, these cells failed to differentiate into ECs on LN1 substrate as determined by suppressed mRNA and protein expression of FlK1 three days after onset of differentiation (Figure 1G) and significantly reduced number of Flk1+VE-cadherin+ ECs at day#6 (Figure 1H). Thus, α6β1 interaction with LN-1 appears to be a crucial mechanism of differentiating mESCs into ECs.
mESCs differentiation into ECs requires interaction of α6β1 with CD151
To address signaling mechanisms downstream of α6β1 mediating ESC differentiation to ECs, we examined the role of the tetraspanin CD151, key regulator of α6β1 signaling [32,33,35]. CD151 interacted with α6β1 on plating mESCs on LN1 but not following mESC plating on type IV collagen (Figure 2A). mESCs were transfected with CD151-siRNA to address the role of CD151 in α6β1-activated signaling (Figure S2A). Control experiments showed that CD151-knockdown alone had no effect on expression of α6 (Figure S2B) and cell viability (Figure S2C) whereas CD151 depletion significantly reduced the emergence of ECs with only 6% of cells becoming Flk1+VE-cadherin+ by day#6 as compared to 25% double positive cells in control experiments (Figure 2B, left and middle panels, and Figure 1D).
In other studies, mESCs were transfected with siRNA targeting CD151, and tyrosine phosphorylation of the α6 effectors, FAK and Akt [40–42], was determined. Deletion of CD151 reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of both FAK and Akt in contrast to controls (Figures 2C, 2D). Further, transfection of the constitutively-active FAK mutant (CD2-FAK) [43] in CD151-depleted mESCs restored FAK activation (Figure S2D) as well as differentiation of mESCs into ECs (Figure 2B, right panel); thus, CD151 activation downstream of α6β1 functioned through FAK and Akt signaling to induce mESC differentiation to ECs.
To further address the role of CD151 in mediating the emergence of ECs, we undertook biotinylation studies of cell surface α6β1 on day#3 of differentiation. mESCs were labeled with reducible biotin on ice and returned to 37°C; at 5, 10, and 20 min the cells were treated with impermeable glutathione to strip biotin from the cell surface followed by cell lysis and analysis by IP of internalized α6β1 retaining the biotin label. We observed that α6β1 was internalized in ESCs differentiating to ECs and the response was significantly reduced in the absence of CD151 (Figure 2E), suggesting the crucial role of CD151-mediated α6β1 internalization in signaling mESC differentiation into ECs.
α3β1 interaction with CD151 prevents mESCs differentiation into ECs
Besides α6, α3 and α7 are the two other LN1-binding integrins forming heterodimers with β1 [44]. As α7 was not detected during the 6-day differentiation period (Figure S3A), we addressed whether α3β1 also has a role in signaling the emergence of ECs. α3 expression increased on day#3 after the onset of differentiation (Figure S3A). Interestingly, treating ESCs with anti-α3 integrin blocking antibody [45,46] beginning on day#3 and continuing until day#6 significantly enhanced the differentiation of mESCs to ECs (Figure 3A). A similar enhanced EC differentiation was recapitulated on transfecting ESCs with α3 siRNA (Figure S3B and S3C). Co-IP studies using mESCs lysates obtained on day#3 showed that α3 interacted with CD151 (Figure 3B). Interestingly, binding of α3 to CD151 was stronger than binding of α6 to CD151 as evident by the requirement for stringent cell lysis condition using 1% NP-40 to disrupt α3/CD151 interaction as opposed to α6/CD151 interaction.
Since CD151 competes with binding to both α6 α3 integrins [47,48], we next addressed the possibility that CD151 binding to α3 influenced CD151 binding to α6. Day#3 cells exposed to increasing concentrations of anti-α3 integrin blocking antibody overnight were lysed and subjected to IP for CD151 and α6. We observed increased association between the two proteins at the highest concentrations of α3 blocking antibody or in the presence of α3 knockdown (Figure 3C), consistent with a competition between the two integrins for binding to CD151. This observation was confirmed by immunostaining using day #3 mESCs differentiating on LN1 exposed to anti-α3 integrin blocking antibody and stained for CD151 and either α3 or α6. The prominent co-localization of α3 with CD151 seen at baseline, was reduced on exposing to α3 blocking antibody; in contrast, co-localization of α6 with CD151 increased on exposing to the anti-α3 antibody (Figure 3D) further consistent with competition of α3 and α6 for binding to CD151.
To address whether α3 regulates the internalization of α6 described above, we determined the consequences of α3 blockade on cell surface expression of α6. On day#3 of differentiation, cells were treated with increasing concentrations of anti-α3 integrin blocking antibody, and subsequently with 50U trypsin to detach any cell surface-associated α6. Immunoblotting using an antibody recognizing only the extracellular α6 domain showed that α3 blockade decreased the susceptibility of cell surface α6 to trypsin cleavage (Figure 3E, upper panel). At the same time, the intracellular C-terminal domain of α6 was unaffected in both α3-blocked and control cells (Figure 3E, lower panel). Thus, α3 functioned by preventing internalization of α6 and, thereby, inhibiting α6 mediated differentiation of mESCs to ECs.
Because CD151 contains the YRSL motif recognized by Adaptor Protein-2 (AP-2) in the C-terminal domain, the core component of the clathrin endocytic machinery [33], we investigated whether association of α3β1 or α6β1 with CD151 regulated internalization of integrins via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Co-IP of α3 and α6 with heavy chain (HC) clathrin showed association between α3 and clathrin HC in control cells, which decreased with increasing concentrations of anti-α3 blocking antibody and was coincident with onset of α6 association with CD151 (Figures 3F, 3G). Depletion of CD151 prevented clathrin binding for both α3 and α6 (Figures 3F, 3G) consistent with a role of CD151 as a bifurcation point for α3 and α6 signaling. Immunostaining studies showed that co-localization of α6 with clathrin was enhanced by increasing the availability of CD151 after blocking α3, and inhibited by CD151-depletion (Figure 3H), confirming the biochemical results. These findings show that α3 and α6 competed for association with CD151 and association of α6 with a core clathrin component regulated endocytosis of α6 following the interaction of α6 with CD151.
α6β1 signaling activates Er71 leading to EC lineage specification
To determine the function of internalized α6 in mediating FAK activation and thereby signaling the differentiation of ESCs to ECs, we assessed tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK. For these experiments, we sorted day#3 cells for Flk1 expression and exposed Flk1+ cells for various times to α3 integrin blocking antibody. Both FAK and Akt phosphorylation were increased (Figure 4A, 4B). In addition, we observed that activation of Akt inhibited activation of Erk1/2 in the same time frame (Figure 4C). These results demonstrate that α6 internalization plays a crucial role in signaling ESC differentiation to ECs whereas α3 represses α6 signaling to prevent differentiation of ECs.
Next, we addressed whether differentiation towards ECs required activation of the transcription factor Er71, known to induce differentiation of stem cells into Flk1+ ECs through binding to Flk1 and VE-cadherin promoters [21–25]. We determined whether α3 blockade and resultant α6 signaling activated Er71. These studies demonstrated Er71 activation was indeed a function of α6 signaling (Figure 4D, 4E) consistent with the role of α6 in the induction of ECs.
As activation of Akt downstream of α6 may be important in signaling EC differentiation [49], we addressed the role of Akt in the activation of transcriptionally-competent Er71. In mESCs transfected with dominant negative Akt (DN-Akt) (Figures S4A, S4B) or with GST-Er71 plasmid (Figure S4C) to upregulate Er71 expression, we observed significantly reduced Er71 phosphorylation in the presence of dominant negative Akt in contrast to controls (Figure 5A). Further, we observed direct association of Akt with Er71 (Figure 5B) supporting a role of Akt in contributing to Er71 activation during ESCs differentiation. mESCs transfection with dominant negative Akt resulted in defective ESCs differentiation into ECs (Figure 5C, left panel) which could not be rescued by co-transfection with GST-Er71 plasmid (Figure 5C, middle panel) whereas transfection with Er71 in the presence of active Akt induced marked differentiation (Figure 5B, right panel) indicating upstream activity of Akt on Er71. Transfection with Er71-empty vector had no effect on differentiation in control experiments (Figure S4D). These observations were further supported by determination of nuclear localization of Er71 in DN-Akt-transfected cells, which was reduced as compared to control cells (Figure 5D), indicating that active Akt was required for Er71 transcriptional activity.
α6β1/CD151 pathway activates Er71 signaling and vasculogenesis in vivo
We next evaluated whether disruption of α6 integrin function modified Er71 upregulation in vivo. We transfected mESCs with siRNA directed against integrin α6 or CD151 and transplanted them subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice. Cell masses were excised on day#3 and day#10. On day#3 after transplantation, using whole tissue RT-PCR (Figure 6A) and immunohistochemistry (Figure 6B), we observed down regulation of Er71 and decreased Er71 protein expression in cells in which either α6 or CD151 were depleted, in association with impaired Er71 nuclear localization. These results suggested impaired activation of Er71 transcriptional activity in the absence of α6 or CD151. On day#10, teratomas formed from mESCs bearing α6 or CD151 siRNA and control mESCs were excised and histologically examined. All formed tumors contained all three embryonic layers (Figure S4A). Teratomas from α6 -and CD151-depleted cells were smaller (Figure 6C) and contained fewer vessels than controls (Figure 6D). To quantify effects of disruption of α6/CD151, we performed RT PCR for the common mesodermal marker Brachyury as well as for genes known to be regulated by Er71, i.e., Vegfa, Tie2 and VE-cadherin (Cdh5)[24]. Although expression of Brachyury was not significantly different compared to scrambled controls (Figure 6E), we observed significant differences in expression of Er71 regulated genes with downregulation in α6-and CD151-depleted cells (Figure 6F). To determine whether overexpression of Er71 rescued defect in angiogenesis, we co-transfected mESCs with siRNA against CD151 and with GST-Er71 (Figure S4B). Both tumor size and vascularity were restored by overexpression of Er71 (Figures 6C, D), whereas expression levels of Er71-controlled genes was restored to control levels (Figure 6F) supporting the role of Er71 and upstream α6β1/CD151 pathway in mediating vascularization.
DISCUSSION
We demonstrated in the present studies the central role of mESCs expressing integrins α3β1 and α6β1, the binding partners of the ECM protein LN1, in differentially regulating the transition of mESCs to the EC lineage. We identified a α3β1-dependent “braking” mechanism suppressing EC differentiation whereas α6β1 promoted EC differentiation through activation of the transcription factor Er71. The identified opposing functions of these integrins in differentially regulating mESCs differentiation to ECs were controlled by CD151, which functioned by competitively associating with either α3β1 or α6β1. Signaling activated downstream of α6 interaction with CD151 induced internalization of α6 via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, suggesting that α6 internalization is a crucial requirement for signaling the emergence of ECs. α6β1 internalization elicited FAK and Akt signaling, with the latter mediating phosphorylation of Er71. We also demonstrated that mESCs lacking α6 or CD151 were defective in teratoma formation related to impaired vasculogenesis. Moreover, this defect was rescued by over-expression of Er71 suggesting that Er71 is both required and sufficient for α6/CD151 interaction mediated transition of mESCs to ECs and resultant vasculogenesis. These results together demonstrate the essential role of interaction of ESC-expressed α6β1 with LN1 in generating ECs capable of forming new vessels.
LN1 is known to bind to α6β1 [1,38,44], but the present studies are the first to document the significance of this interaction in ESC differentiation to the EC lineage. α6β1 functioned secondary to activation of Akt, a pro-survival signal [50]. In addition to the role of Akt in activating EC differentiation through phosphorylation of Er71, it is possible that Akt also plays a role in contributing to the survival of emerging ECs. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that both Akt regulated mechanisms are responsible for the observed ESC transition to ECs.
The tetraspanin CD151 was required for α6β1 signaling mediating ESC differentiation into ECs. This was evident from findings that LN1-dependent FAK and Akt signaling were inhibited by CD151 depletion and both FAK activation and EC differentiation were restored by expressing constitutively-active FAK mutant in CD151-depleted cells.
We demonstrated that, at the mesodermal progenitor phase, the ESC-expressed α3β1 interacted with CD151 to prevent differentiation towards EC lineage. In contrast, CD151 binding to α6 induced α6 internalization that was dependent on activation of the clathrin endocytic machinery. This finding is consistent with the role of internalization of integrins from the plasma membrane in several integrin regulated processes such as cell adhesion, differentiation, spreading, migration, and invasion [51]. Although α3 and α6 can both associate with a core clathrin component, only α6 was internalized, suggesting that activation of endocytosis of α6 required its interaction with CD151, and hence the α6 signaling responsible for EC differentiation.
We observed that integrin α6β1 competed with α3β1 for binding to CD151. The inhibition of α3 association with CD151 favored the interaction of CD151 with α6, and induced α6β1-mediated FAK signaling and Er71 phosphorylation. This competitive relationship between α3β1 and α6β1 suggests that CD151 acts as an integrin “toggle switch” regulating the transition to ECs. Indeed, double knockout (α3−/−:: α6−/−) mice have developmental defects not seen in single mutants [52], consistent with opposing signaling functions of α3β1 and α6β1. Studies in which GFP-tagged peptides corresponding to cytoplasmic domain of α3 were injected into LN1-adherent fibroblasts expressing α6β1 integrin showed disengagement of α6β1 integrin [53] consistent with our observations. CD151 was also shown to function as a co-receptor for α6β1 and α3β1 based on its affinity for LN-associated integrins [30–34]. Deletion of CD151 in ECs was accompanied by changes in molecular organization of LN-binding integrins and marked integrin-dependent defects in cell spreading, motility, and 3-dimensional morphology [54,55], pointing to the key role of CD151 interaction with α3β1 or α6β1 in differentially regulating ESCs differentiation to ECs.
Er71 binds to promoters of both VE-cadherin and Flk-1 contributing to the differentiation towards EC lineage [21]. Er71 also acts in concert with the hematopoietic transcription factor Gata2 to promote hematopoietic lineage differentiation at the embryroid body stage [25,56]. Although we did not assess α6β1-mediated hematopoietic progenitor cell generation, it is possible that LN1 interaction with α6β1 is also involved in hematopoiesis in addition to EC lineage specification as demonstrated.
In summary, our results showed opposing effects of α6β1 and α3β1 through their differential binding to CD151 in regulating the differentiation of ESCs to ECs. Applying the EC differentiating condition in ESCs induced CD151 binding to α6 resulting in the internalization of α6 and differentiation towards ECs. The complex organized by α6β1/CD151 interaction was the essential cue for activation of FAK and Akt resulting in phosphorylation of Er71. Thus, our results support a model in which the formation of α6β1/CD151 complex and activation of FAK and Akt mediate the transition of ESCs to ECs that may have the potential for efficient production of ECs useful for vascular regeneration.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
Supported by grants from NIH grants HL090152 & HL118068 to ABM, HL119291 to CP, GM094220 to JR, and HL079356 to KKW. ST is recipient of the Parker B. Francis Fellowship
Footnotes
Author contributions
ST, ABM, JR and KW designed the experiments; ST and MM performed the experiments. ST, ABM, JR and KW analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. FL assisted in ESC differentiation experiments. PT assisted with the microscopy experiments, and CP advised on the Er71 component of the studies.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of financial interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110:673–687. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stupack DG, Cheresh DA. ECM remodeling regulates angiogenesis: endothelial integrins look for new ligands. Sci STKE. 2002;119:pe7. doi: 10.1126/stke.2002.119.pe7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lange A, Wickström SA, Jakobson, et al. Integrin-linked kinase is an adaptor with essential functions during mouse development. Nature. 2009;461:1002–1006. doi: 10.1038/nature08468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mammoto A, Connor KM, Mammoto T, et al. A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that controls angiogenesis. Nature. 2009;457:1103–1108. doi: 10.1038/nature07765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Malanchi I, Santamaria-Martínez A, Susanto E, et al. Interactions between cancer stem cells and their niche govern metastatic colonization. Nature. 2011;481:85–89. doi: 10.1038/nature10694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Streuli CH. Integrins and cell-fate determination. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:171–177. doi: 10.1242/jcs.018945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science. 2009;324:1673–1677. doi: 10.1126/science.1171643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Choi KD, Yu J, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Hematopoietic and endothelial differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27:559–567. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang HM, Moon SH, Choi YS, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells in humanized mouse models harboring a human immune system. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:2839–2849. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adams WJ, Zhang Y, Cloutier J, et al. Functional vascular endothelium derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2013;1:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Prasain N, Lee MR, Vemula S, et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cells similar to cord-blood endothelial colony-forming cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:1151–1157. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tanentzapf G, Devenport D, Godt D, Brown NH. Integrin-dependent anchoring of a stem-cell niche. Nat.Cell Biol. 2007;9:1413–1418. doi: 10.1038/ncb1660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pacilli A, Pasquinelli G. Vascular wall resident progenitor cells: a review. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:901–914. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cheng P, Andersen P, Hassel D, et al. Fibronectin mediates mesendodermal cell fate decisions. Development. 2013;140:2587–2596. doi: 10.1242/dev.089052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh MD, Kreiner M, McKimmie CS, et al. Dimeric integrin alpha5beta1 ligands confer morphological and differentiation responses to murine embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390:716–721. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ghosh M, Helm KM, Smith RW, et al. A single cell functions as a tissue-specific stem cell and the in vitro niche-forming cell. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45:459–469. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0314OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lathia JD, Gallagher J, Heddleston JM, et al. Integrin alpha 6 regulates glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:421–432. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.James D, Nam HS, Seandel M, et al. Expansion and maintenance of human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells by TGFbeta inhibition is Id1 dependent. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:161–166. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Orlova VV, van den Hil FE, Petrus-Reurer S, et al. Generation, expansion and functional analysis of endothelial cells and pericytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:1514–1531. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kohler EE, Wary KK, Li F, et al. Flk1+ and VE-cadherin+ endothelial cells derived from iPSCs recapitulate vascular development during differentiation and display similar angiogenic potential as ESC-derived cells. PloS One. 2013:e85549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee D, Park C, Lee H, et al. Er71 acts downstream of BMP, Notch, and Wnt signaling in blood and vessel progenitor specification. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:497–507. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Palencia-Desai S, Kohli V, Kang J, et al. Vascular endothelial and endocardial progenitors differentiate as cardiomyocytes in the absence of Etsrp/Etv2 function. Development. 2011;138:4721–4732. doi: 10.1242/dev.064998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kataoka H, Hayashi M, Nakagawa R, et al. Etv2/Er71 induces vascular mesoderm from Flk1+PDGFRα+ primitive mesoderm. Blood. 2011;118:6975–6986. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-352658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu F, Kang I, Park C, et al. ER71 specifies Flk-1+ hemangiogenic mesoderm by inhibiting cardiac mesoderm and Wnt signaling. Blood. 2012;119:3295–3305. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-403766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Park C, Kim TM, Malik AB. Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell and vascular development. Circ Res. 2013;112:1380–1400. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Domogatskaya A, Rodin S, Boutaud A, et al. Laminin-511 but not −332, −111, or −411 enables mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal in vitro. Stem Cells. 2008;26:2800–2809. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Klaffky EJ, Gonzáles IM, Sutherland AE. Trophoblast cells exhibit differential responses to laminin isoforms. Dev Biol. 2006;292:277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Risau W, Lemmon V. Changes in the vascular extracellular matrix during embryonic vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Dev Biol. 1988;125:441–450. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90225-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hemler ME. Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:801–811. doi: 10.1038/nrm1736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yauch RL, Berditchevski F, Harler MB, et al. Highly stoichiometric, stable, and specific association of integrin alpha3beta1 with CD151 provides a major link to phosphatidylinositol-4 kinase, and may regulate cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:2751–2765. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.10.2751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stipp CS, Hemler ME. Transmembrane-4-superfamily proteins CD151 and CD81 associate with alpha 3 beta 1 integrin, and selectively contribute to alpha 3 beta 1-dependent neurite outgrowth. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:187–182. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.11.1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lammerding J, Kazarov AR, Huang H, et al. Tetraspanin CD151 regulates alpha6beta1 integrin adhesion strengthening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7616–7621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1337546100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu L, He B, Liu WM, et al. Tetraspanin CD151 promotes cell migration by regulating integrin trafficking. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:31631–31642. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701165200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Winterwood NE, Varzavand A, Meland MN, et al. A critical role for tetraspanin CD151 in alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrin-dependent tumor cell functions on laminin-5. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:2707–2721. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang XA, Kazarov AR, Yang X, et al. Function of the tetraspanin CD151-alpha6beta1 integrin complex during cellular morphogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:1–11. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-10-0481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kohler EE, Cowan EC, Chatterjee I, et al. NANOG induction of Fetal liver kinase-1 (FLK1) transcription regulates endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Blood. 2011;117:1761–1769. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-295261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;28:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling. Science. 1999;285:1028–1032. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5430.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hughes PE, Oertli B, Hansen M, et al. Suppression of integrin activation by activated Ras or Raf does not correlate with bulk activation of ERK MAP kinase. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:2256–2265. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-10-0480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Herzog B, Pellet-Many C, Britton G, et al. VEGF binding to NRP1 is essential for VEGF stimulation of endothelial cell migration, complex formation between NRP1 and VEGFR2, and signaling via FAK Tyr407 phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:2766–2776. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen XL, Nam J, Jean C, et al. VEGF-induced vascular permeability is mediated by FAK. Dev Cell. 2012;22:146–157. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xia H, Nho RS, Kahm J, et al. Focal adhesion kinase is upstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt in regulating fibroblast survival in response to contraction of type I collagen matrices via a beta 1 integrin viability signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33024–33034. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313265200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Oktay M, Wary KK, Dans M, et al. Integrin-mediated activation of focal adhesion kinase is required for signaling to Jun NH2-terminal kinase and progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:1461–1469. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.7.1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Domogatskaya A, Rodin S, Tryggvason K. Functional diversity of laminins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:523–553. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen Y, Lasaitiene D, Gabrielsson BG, et al. Neonatal losartan treatment suppresses renal expression of molecules involved in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1232–1243. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000123690.75029.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.DeFreitas MF, Yoshida CK, Frazier WA, et al. Identification of integrin a3b1 as a neuronal thrombospondin receptor mediating neurite outgrowth. Neuron. 1995;15:333–343. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90038-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wright MD, Geary SM, Fitter S, et al. Characterization of mice lacking the tetraspanin superfamily member CD151. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:5978–5988. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.13.5978-5988.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sterk LM, Geuijen CA, van den Berg JG, et al. Association of the tetraspanin CD151 with the laminin-binding integrins alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha6beta4 and alpha7beta1 in cells in culture and in vivo. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:1161–1173. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.6.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yu KR, Yang SR, Jung JW, et al. CD49f enhances multipotency and maintains stemness through the direct regulation of OCT4 and SOX2. Stem Cells. 2012;30:876–887. doi: 10.1002/stem.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Frisch SM, Ruoslahti E. Integrins and anoikis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:701–706. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80124-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Margadant C, Monsur HN, Norman JC, et al. Mechanisms of integrin activation and trafficking. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:607–614. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.De Arcangelis A, Mark M, Kreidberg MJ, et al. Synergistic activities of alpha3 and alpha6 integrins are required during apical ectodermal ridge formation and organogenesis in the mouse. Development. 1999;126:3957–3968. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.17.3957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Laplantine E, Vallar L, Mann K, et al. Interaction between the cytodomains of the alpha3 and beta1 integrin subunits regulates remodeling of adhesion complexes on laminin. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:1167–1176. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.7.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Takeda Y, Kazarov AR, Butterfield CE, et al. Deletion of tetraspanin CD151 results in decreased pathologic angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Blood. 2007;109:1524–1532. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-041970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Takeda Y, Li Q, Kazarov AR, et al. Diminished metastasis in tetraspanin CD151-knockout mice. Blood. 2011;118:464–472. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-302240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lammerts van Bueren K, Black BL. Regulation of endothelial and hematopoietic development by the ETS transcription factor Etv2. Curr Opin Hematol. 2012;19:199–205. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3283523e07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.