Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014 Nov 23;54(10):1006–1008. doi: 10.1177/0009922814559381

The impact of adherence to pediatric community-acquired pneumonia guidelines on clinical outcomes

Pui-Ying Iroh Tam 1, Benjamin R Hanisch 1, Michael O’Connell 2
PMCID: PMC4441860  NIHMSID: NIHMS674309  PMID: 25422523

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) accounts for over 150,000 hospitalizations annually in the United States,1 and is one of the most common inpatient diagnoses.2 In children, treatment for CAP is typically presumptive based on epidemiologic data specifying the most common etiologies for each age group. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America on management of CAP in children recommend initial empiric therapy of ampicillin or penicillin G for a child who is hospitalized. In addition, the guidelines strongly recommend collection of blood cultures (BCs) in any children requiring hospitalization for presumed moderate to severe bacterial CAP.3 The primary objective of our study was to evaluate how closely we adhere to guidelines on empiric therapy choices for management of pediatric CAP, including how often BCs were obtained and subsequently influenced management. Our secondary objective was to assess whether this management correlated with clinical outcomes.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective study of all children between 2 months to 18 years of age hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of CAP from January 2011 to December 2013 within an urban health system comprising of six hospitals. A case of pneumonia hospitalization was defined as a record with any of the following ICD-9 codes assigned as the primary diagnosis: 073.0, 481–486. We excluded patients with ICD-9 codes correlating with an underlying illness, immunocompromise or chronic condition: 87.46, 140–239, 416, 238, 585. In addition, patients hospitalized within the previous 30 days were also excluded. Medical charts were reviewed and data extracted included antimicrobials prescribed, BC collection and result, length of hospitalization, ICU admission, and therapeutic interventions such as chest tube placement and mechanical ventilation.

Fisher’s exact test were used to determine the effects of antimicrobials prescribed on hospitalization, ICU stay, and therapeutic intervention, while linear regression was used to evaluate length of hospital stay, adjusting for demographics and clinical factors. Statistical significance was set at 5%. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota.

Results

One hundred and twenty-eight patients were identified, of which 90 patients were eligible. Forty-nine percent were male. Median age was 1.9 years, with a range of 2 months to 18 years (Table 1). All patients received antimicrobial therapy, of which 63 patients (72%) received a third generation cephalosporin as part of their treatment regimen. Seven patients received vancomycin, of which 43% were in the ICU, and 71% required therapeutic interventions. Only one patient received parenteral ampicillin.

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical features of pediatric patients hospitalized with CAP

Characteristic N (%)
Hospitalized patients with CAP 90
Male 44 (49)
Age, median (range) 1.9 years (2 months – 18 years)
Length of hospital stay, median (range) 82 hours (12 hours – 24 days 17 hours)
Blood culture obtained 55 (61)
Antimicrobials prescribed
 Third-generation cephalosporin 63 (72)
 Azithromycin 28 (32)
 Ampicillin 1 (1)
 Vancomycin 7 (8)
ICU admission 7 (8)
Therapeutic intervention 14 (16)
Mortality 0 (0)

CAP, community-acquired pneumonia

Neither cephalosporins nor ampicillin were associated with a significant difference in length of hospitalization (p=0.06 and p=0.90 respectively), need for ICU stay (p=0.18 and p=1.00 respectively), or therapeutic intervention (p=0.33 and p=1.00 respectively). In contrast, vancomycin was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (p=0.0001), ICU admission (p=0.01), and therapeutic intervention (p=0.008). After controlling for these factors with multiple linear regression, patients receiving vancomycin still had an average length of stay that was 68 hours longer than those who did not receive this antimicrobial (p=0.05).

Blood cultures were performed in 55 patients (61%) hospitalized with CAP. Of these, only one BC was considered a true positive, which was S. pneumoniae. The other positive BC was micrococcus and considered a contaminant. The patient with positive BC was treated with a third generation cephalosporin and vancomycin, and vancomycin was discontinued once the profile indicated susceptibility to cephalosporins. The patient completed a course of therapy with a cephalosporin despite susceptibility of the pathogen to penicillin. Collection of BC was not associated with length of hospital stay (p=0.24), ICU admission (p=0.25), nor with therapeutic intervention (p=1.00).

Discussion

This study found that broad-spectrum antimicrobial prescribing for management of pediatric CAP remains prevalent despite national guidelines advocating narrow-spectrum therapy, and despite evidence that narrow-spectrum therapy is as effective as broad-spectrum antimicrobials with low adverse outcomes.4,5 Almost three-quarters of patients in our study received broad-spectrum therapy, which indicates opportunities to educate providers and improve care. However, use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials did not lead to significantly different outcomes in hospitalized patients. Interestingly, the only statistically significant finding associated with antimicrobial usage was the increased length of hospitalization with vancomycin for the treatment of CAP. This remained statistically significant even after controlling for clinical and demographic factors, though this likely reflects its usage in patients with more severe disease, rather than its causality in severe disease.

The collection of BCs in patients hospitalized with CAP has traditionally been considered a marker of high quality care, and has been recommended by the American Thoracic Society since the 1990s as part of the initial evaluation of these patients.6,7 However this practice has increasingly been questioned, particularly in adult literature where studies suggest that BC yield is low and results rarely change management.810 In our study, BC was collected in 61% of patients. However, only 2% were positive, the result did not lead to change in management, and positivity was not associated with poor clinical outcome.

Although this was a multi-center study, the small numbers of patients receiving narrow-spectrum therapy did not provide sufficient power for robust statistical analyses. While we attempted to account for patient risk factors by excluding patients with comorbid conditions based on ICD-9 codes, and by using length of hospitalization, ICU admission, and therapeutic interventions as correlates of severity of illness, these methods may not have been sufficiently comprehensive. Larger numbers are required to more closely assess associations of antimicrobial use on clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, this study indicates that adherence to guidelines is low, and the majority of pediatric patients hospitalized with CAP were not prescribed narrow-spectrum antimicrobial therapy. Although BC was obtained in over half the patients, BC was positive in only 2% of cases and did not lead to change in antimicrobial management. Guidelines have not yet been fully adopted, and continued efforts to educate physicians, modify clinical practice, and monitor the impact on clinical outcomes, are needed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Zohara Cohen and Emily Melcher for assistance with data collection, and Philippe Gaillard for assistance with statistical analysis.

Funding source: BRH is supported by a National Institutes of Health T32 training grant [HD068229]. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award Number UL1TR000114.

Abbreviations

CAP

community-acquired pneumonia

BC

blood culture

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Lee GE, Lorch SA, Sheffler-Collins S, Kronman MP, Shah SS. National hospitalization trends for pediatric pneumonia and associated complications. Pediatrics. 2010;126:204–213. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keren R, Luan X, Localio R, Hall M, McLeod L, Dai D, Srivastava R. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2012;166:1155–1164. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, Alverson B, Carter ER, Harrison C, Kaplan SL, Mace SE, McCracken GH, Jr, Moore MR, St Peter SD, Stockwell JA, Swanson JT Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:e25–76. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Newman RE, Hedican EB, Herigon JC, Williams DD, Williams AR, Newland JG. Impact of a guideline on management of children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e597–604. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Queen MA, Myers AL, Hall M, Shah SS, Williams DJ, Auger KA, Jerardi KE, Statile AM, Tieder JS. Comparative effectiveness of empiric antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e23–29. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dedier J, Singer DE, Chang Y, Moore M, Atlas SJ. Processes of care, illness severity, and outcomes in the management of community-acquired pneumonia at academic hospitals. Archives of internal medicine. 2001;161:2099–2104. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.17.2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Niederman MS, Bass JB, Jr, Campbell GD, Fein AM, Grossman RF, Mandell LA, Marrie TJ, Sarosi GA, Torres A, Yu VL. Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. The American review of respiratory disease. 1993;148:1418–1426. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Afshar N, Tabas J, Afshar K, Silbergleit R. Blood cultures for community-acquired pneumonia: are they worthy of two quality measures? A systematic review. Journal of hospital medicine : an official publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine. 2009;4:112–123. doi: 10.1002/jhm.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arbo MD, Snydman DR. Influence of blood culture results on antibiotic choice in the treatment of bacteremia. Archives of internal medicine. 1994;154:2641–2645. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230024004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ramanujam P, Rathlev NK. Blood cultures do not change management in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2006;13:740–745. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.03.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES