Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2015 May 26;2:150027. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.27

An archive of longitudinal recordings of the vocalizations of adult Gombe chimpanzees

Frans X Plooij 1,a, Hetty van de Rijt-Plooij 1,*, Martha Fischer 2, Michael L Wilson 3, Anne Pusey 4
PMCID: PMC4443877  PMID: 26029380

Abstract

Studies of chimpanzee vocal communication provide valuable insights into the evolution of communication in complex societies, and also comparative data for understanding the evolution of human language. One particularly valuable dataset of recordings from free-living chimpanzees was collected by Frans X. Plooij and the late Hetty van de Rijt-Plooij at Gombe National Park, Tanzania (1971–73). These audio specimens, which have not yet been analysed, total over 10 h on 28 tapes, including 7 tapes focusing on adult individuals with a total of 605 recordings. In 2014 the first part of that collection of audio specimens covering the vocalizations of the immature Gombe chimpanzees was made available. The data package described here covers the vocalizations of the adult chimpanzees. We expect these recordings will prove useful for studies on topics including referential signalling and the emergence of dialects. The digitized sound recordings were stored in the Macaulay Library and the Dryad Repository. In addition, the original notes on the contexts of the calls were translated and transcribed from Dutch into English.

Subject terms: Language, Animal behaviour, Biological anthropology, Long-term memory

Background & Summary

Chimpanzees produce a wide variety of vocalizations, ranging from barely audible grunts to loud screams and pant-hoots that can be heard at distances of 1–2 kilometres1–3. These vocalizations play important roles in the complex social behaviour of chimpanzees, and have attracted growing interest from researchers4–18. Because chimpanzees are one of the two living species most closely related to humans, researchers have been particularly interested in insights that chimpanzee vocalizations can provide to studies of language evolution19–21. Here we report on a dataset that will prove useful for answering various questions about chimpanzee vocal communication: recordings of adult chimpanzees made at Gombe National Park, Tanzania (1971–1973).

The late Hetty H. C. van de Rijt-Plooij and her husband Frans Plooij recorded these vocalizations and contextual information as part of their dissertation research. The calls have not yet been analysed, but have been digitized and archived at the Macaulay Library (Data Citation 1) with extensive metadata (see section ‘Data Records’) for each recording. We previously described the dataset of recordings from immature individuals22; here we describe the dataset of recordings from adults.

Supplementary data files are available from Dryad (Data Citation 2). All adult individuals were recorded longitudinally for nearly 2 years, just like the immature individuals. Table 1 presents the names, birth dates, age class, sex, span of longitudinal recordings in years/months, and the number of recordings in which each individual was involved. The total number of recordings is 605.

Table 1. The names, birth dates, age class, sex, span of longitudinal recordings in years/months, and the number of recordings for each chimpanzee individual recorded in Gombe National Park in the period 1971–73.

Animal Name (abbreviation) Birth Date (approximately) Age Class Sex Age span longitudinal recordings (years/months) Number of Recordings
Span of longitudinal recordings in months are only given for the infants. The total number of recordings is 727.          
FLO 02-jul-19 Adult F 52–54 years 7
HUGO (HG) 02-jul-36 Adult M 35–37 years 19
GOLIATH (GOL) 02-jul-37 Adult M 34–36 years 21
MIKE (MK) 02-jul-38 Adult M 33–35 years 24
HUGH (HH) 02-jul-44 Adult M 27–29 years 2
MADAM B (MB) 02-jul-45 Adult F 26–28 years 2
HUMPHREY (HM) 02-jul-46 Adult M 25–27 years 58
FABEN (FB) 02-jul-47 Adult M 24–26 years 45
DE 02-jul-48 Adult M 23–25 years 4
WILLY WALLY (WW) 02-jul-49 Adult M 22–24 years 3
MELISSA (ML) 02-jul-49 Adult F 22–24 years 35
PASSION (PS) 02-jul-49 Adult F 22–24 years 9
NOPE (NP) 02-jul-50 Adult F 21–23 years 5
CHARLIE (CH) 02-jul-51 Adult M 20–22 years 29
EVERED (EV) 02-jul-52 Adult M 19–21 years 48
PALLAS (PL) 02-jul-52 Adult F 19–21 years 54
ATHENA (AT) 02-jul-52 Adult F 19–21 years 11
FIGAN (FG) 02-jul-53 Adult M 18–20 years 73
GODI (GI) 02-jul-53 Adult M 18–20 years 15
NOVA (NV) 02-jul-53 Adult F 18–20 years 32
GIGI (GG) 02-jul-54 Adult F 17–19 years 14
SATAN (ST) 02-jul-55 Adult M 16–18 years 17
MIFF (MF) 02-jul-56 Adult F 15–17 years 7
JOMEO (JJ) 02-jul-56 Adult M 15–17 years 29
FIFI (FF) 02-jul-58 Adult F 13–15 years 24
WINKLE (WK) 02-jul-58 Adult F 13–15 years 68
SPARROW (SW) 02-jul-58 Adult F 13–15 years 16
SNIFF (SF) 02-jul-59 Adolescent M 12–14 years 3
GILKA (GK) 02-jul-60 Adolescent F 11–13 years 1
SHERRY (SH) 02-jul-61 Adolescent M 10–12 years 8
FLINT (FT) 01-mrt-64 Juvenile M 7.2–9.0 years 6
GOBLIN (GB) 06-sep-64 Juvenile M 6.7–8.5 years 8
MUSTARD (MU) 22-nov-65 Juvenile M 5.5–7.3 years 1
ATLAS (AL) 25-sep-67 Infant M 43–65 months 2
MOEZA (MZ) 20-jan-69 Infant F 28–50 months 1
SKOSHA (SS) 27-mrt-70 Infant F 14–30 months 4
PLATO (PT) 07-sep-70 Infant M 10–29 months 6
GREMLIN (GM) 19-nov-70 Infant F 7–27 months 2
FREUD (FD) 22-mei-71 Infant M 0–20 months 13
PROF (PF) 26-okt-71 Infant M 0–15 months 1
Open in a new tab

We envisage that this collection of vocalizations may be used for numerous studies including investigation of the existence of dialects, the influence of body size on sound production, and the use of vocalizations in referential signalling.

Controversy continues over whether regional variation in chimpanzee vocal production result from social learning (as in dialects in humans and songbirds23) or from some other factor. Mitani, who led the first study reporting chimpanzee dialects24, later reassessed whether such variation necessarily resulted from social learning. Instead, Mitani and colleagues25 argued that regional variation in acoustic structure could result from factors including habitat acoustics and body size. Subsequent studies have provided some additional support for the vocal learning hypothesis. For example, a study of two populations of unrelated chimpanzees in captivity found acoustic differences between the two populations26. Additionally, a study of four groups of wild chimpanzees found acoustic differences that were unrelated to genetic differences among individuals5. Nonetheless, all of these studies have been cross-sectional, rather than longitudinal, and thus cannot answer questions such as whether the acoustic structure of an individual’s vocalizations is fixed or flexible over time. Combined with archival recordings from the Gombe population made by other researchers (Marler 1967)27–29, Uhlenbroek (1991–93)30, and O’Bryan (2009–10)), the recordings described here will provide an unprecedented historical depth for understanding changes in acoustic structure of primate calls over time, in other words a longitudinal study of vocal change within the population. This longitudinal record provides a particularly valuable resource for understanding how chimpanzee ‘dialects’ emerge.

Body mass data are important for testing the extent to which vocalizations provide information about the caller’s body size. Recent studies of several species have found that one measure of acoustic structure, formant frequency dispersion, correlates with body mass31–33, but this has not yet been examined in chimpanzees. The Gombe study is unusual in that individuals were regularly weighed during this period34, making it possible to match acoustic features with body mass. Because body mass measurements were made from 1967–2000, these can also be taken into account in the analysis of longitudinal changes proposed above.

Furthermore, as our collection of recordings contains a large number of ‘tonal grunts’ such as the hoo-call (that is, quiet, low amplitude alert hoo), this allows for a study of the context in which these calls are used. A recent study has argued these calls represent functionally referential signals35. Additional information on the contexts in which these calls are given should prove valuable in interpreting their function.

Methods

The location of the recordings is shown in Fig. 1 of ref. 22. All the recordings of adult vocalizations were made at a cleared feeding area in the Kakombe valley of Gombe National Park in the center of the range of the habituated community, where individual chimpanzees were regularly provided with bananas from metal boxes embedded in a closed trench attached to a building1,36. Chimpanzees frequently visited the feeding area and the recordist waited inside the building for their arrival. When chimpanzees were present in the feeding area, the recordist stood at a distance of 5–15 meters from the chimpanzees and recorded their vocalizations with a directional Sennheiser MKH 815T microphone attached to a Nagra sound recorder (full track mono, 19.05 cm/s or 7.5 inch/s) (see Fig. 2 in ref. 22). The recordist also recorded a verbal commentary before or after the vocalizations that included the names of the chimpanzees and the names of the vocalizations they produced, together with a description of the behaviour surrounding the vocalizations. Definitions of the chimpanzee behavior categories are given in Appendix A of ref. 37.

As described in reference22, after the sound recordings were made, analogue audio specimens were selected from the tape and coupled with metadata that consisted of the transcriptions of the verbal commentary in Dutch and a number of other pieces of information that are described under Data Records. The analogue audio specimens were created by listening to the original recordings and cutting out the stretches of tape containing chimpanzee vocalizations. The stretches of tape were glued together and stored on 28 reels totalling 10 h of chimpanzee vocalizations, where 7 reels concerned adult individuals.

In 2010 the analogue audio specimens were digitized at a resolution of 24 bits and 96 kilohertz at the Macaulay Library. In 2014 the transcriptions of the verbal commentary to the adult recordings were translated from Dutch to English. These transcriptions and associated metadata (see Data Records) were entered into a spreadsheet and then into the Macaulay Library database (Data Citation 1).

Data Records

The 605 audio specimens at the Macaulay Library can be accessed directly via Data Citation 1 or by using Advanced Search, and searching for recordings with ‘Van de Rijt-Plooij, H.’ as the recordist and ‘Adult’ as Age (see Fig. 1). One can also search for vocalization types (panthoot, grunt, etc.) using the Advanced Search Notes field. As described in reference22 each specimen, which can be played back online, includes the following metadata: the catalog number, species name, recording date, recording geography with map, latitude/longitude, the media and equipment used, the name of the recordist, the recording length (duration), recording quality (rated according to a five star system) and notes. ‘Recording Quality’ indicates the signal-to-noise ratio with 5 stars meaning clear vocalization and very low noise in the recording. For a further specification of the measurement behind the 5 star system, see the Technical Validation section. Notes include the names of the vocalizing individual(s) together with the vocalization(s) of each individual and the behaviour and situation surrounding the vocalizations.

Figure 1. A screenshot of a Macaulay Library website search result.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Clicking on the Macaulay Library Catalog number (that is 163578) will take the reader to an automatic playing of the audio along with the recording’s full set of metadata. Clicking on the red triangle plays the audio; clicking on the waveform icon brings up the audiofile in RavenViewer.

Many recordings contain multiple calls by multiple animals. This means the overall sample size is quite large. Table 2 (available online only) summarizes the number of each type of vocalization given by each adult individual. This table gives an indication of the frequency of the various call types and the relative contribution of each individual. It is a conservative estimate because, whenever the description gave a call type name in plural, only two calls were counted. It is striking the recordings include 303 panthoots, 141 tonal grunts and 223 grunts. These provide a robust sample size for some of the potential studies mentioned under ‘Background and Summary’.

Table 2. Counts of call types by adult individuals.

  Individual ID
                                                      
Call type AT CH DE EV FB FF FG FLO GEN GG GI GOL HG HH HM JJ MB MF MK ML NP NV PL PS ST SW UN WK WW TOTAL
banging 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4
bark 4 0 1 3 3 1 3 0 2 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 1 6 15 8 1 67
beep 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
burp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
cough 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 6 0 1 2 0 2 0 30
coughing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
crying 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 8
drumming 0 1 0 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 20
eagle raa 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 18
effort grunt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
excitement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12
foodbark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 13 0 1 3 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 38
groan 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
grunt 1 6 0 8 23 5 34 3 4 4 1 5 2 0 11 7 0 4 7 19 0 16 24 1 5 0 9 24 0 223
hoot 3 2 0 2 9 4 60 0 4 0 1 3 4 3 4 8 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 5 7 0 125
laugh 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 17
lipsmacking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
pantbark 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 19
pantgrunt 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 1 4 0 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 5 1 0 32
panthoot 2 15 2 23 8 9 37 1 39 1 10 9 3 0 36 17 0 0 5 9 2 3 1 1 7 2 45 16 0 303
panting 2 0 0 1 2 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 23
rough grunt 5 1 2 6 2 2 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 7 2 2 11 1 0 0 5 6 1 66
scream 4 0 1 1 6 5 6 0 4 3 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 5 2 4 0 2 5 18 7 2 85
sigh 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
silence 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 10 4 0 25
slap 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
slapstamp 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
sneeze 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
sound 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0 18
squeak 0 2 0 1 1 1 4 0 2 5 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 1 0 0 5 1 8 1 48
squeal 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 9
stamp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
teethclapping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 6
tonal grunt 5 7 0 6 14 0 6 0 2 2 0 2 8 0 6 0 0 0 6 1 4 7 14 3 3 9 9 27 0 141
uh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 6
unknown 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
vocalizations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
waabark 0 0 0 1 2 6 2 0 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 4 0 35
whimper 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 10
whimper ho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 1 4 0 14
yawn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 31 35 6 60 87 40 172 8 96 32 22 37 26 3 76 43 3 17 43 43 22 49 72 12 34 41 188 122 5 1425
Open in a new tab

Below, we repeat the description and use of the metadata from our previous work describing infant vocalizations22 with minor modifications. Metadata for all the adult individuals, cross-referenced by Macaulay Library catalog number, have been submitted to Dryad (Data Citation 2) in order to allow users to search for specific recordings beyond the capabilities currently provided by the Macaulay Library web interface. The first file of these metadata is a spreadsheet (AdultDirSounds11Dec14Final.xls) and includes the name(s) of the vocalizing individual(s), the vocalization, the behaviour, and other details. The first column of the spreadsheet contains the Macaulay Library catalog number and that is the link to the library’s database. The spreadsheet is basically the same as the Macaulay Library database except that the columns are organized in a slightly different way. From left to right the following columns can be found: ‘Macaulay catalog number’, ‘Recording Device’, ‘Focal individuals’, ‘Recordist record number’, the ‘Level of Recording’ as selected on the Nagra sound recorder, the ‘Quality outstanding’ column where an x indicates a recording that is outstanding for various reasons (such as a very clear, good-quality recording, a recording where the vocalization is without other, simultaneous vocalizations, a recording that is a good demonstration of a call type), the ‘Month’, ‘Day’ and ‘Year’ of the recording, the ‘Individuals Vocalizing’ in the recording, the ‘Individual(s) with sound/call type’, the ‘Context of vocalizations’ and behaviors surrounding the vocalizations, the ‘Macaulay Library Public Notes’ field, the ‘Microphone’, the ‘Recorder’, and the ‘Tape Speed’. As is described in the Usage Notes section, the grammar of the column containing individual(s) with sound/call type is such that the sequence of vocalizing is preserved. This gives information on who initiated calling, if several individuals called. This is important because it shows that vocalizations of others often triggered individuals to vocalize. In the column ‘Observation of the context and behaviors surrounding the vocalizations’ the presence of nearby individuals was also noted, even if they did not vocalize.

Furthermore, the Dryad data package includes the unparsed digital copies of the chimpanzee tapes (the source analog reel-to-reel media that the Macaulay Library converted to 96 kHz/24-bit files) and two additional data files. One file is the Gombe_biography (Gombe_biography-for_1971-3.xls) for the chimpanzee individuals present during the span of time that the recordings were made. The Gombe biography gives the name of the individual (column B), the estimated birth date (column C), and the sex of the individual (column I). These and other columns in the file are explained in38. The second file is a list of names of adult vocalizations (List of vocalizations adults.xlsx) as used in the spreadsheet (AdultDirSounds11Dec14Final.xls) and the Macaulay Library database. The first column contains the main categories of which the barks, eagle raa, grunts, hoots and screams are the most important. The second column contains the subdivisions of the barks, grunts, hoots and screams. The names in the first and the second column correspond to the call types in Table 2 (available online only). The third column contains all the word variations that were used for each main category or subdivision thereof. Before counting the frequencies of the vocalizations (given in Table 2 (available online only)), these word variations were converted into the name of the main category or subdivision.

Technical Validation

The same validation procedures as described in our previous subadult work22 have been used to support the present adult audio recordings.

The ‘Quality’ of the sound recordings in the Macaulay Library is an informal and rough Indication of the ratio of signal power to noise power (SNR). Five stars means that the recording has an SNR of 50:1 (3.9% of the 605 recordings were given this rating); four stars means an SNR of roughly 40:1 (16.5%); three stars conveys an SNR of roughly 30:1 (28.5%); two stars points to an SNR of roughly 20:1 (26.6%); and one star indicates SNR of less than 10:1 (24.5%.)). The frequency distribution of the absolute number of recordings (y-axis) over the ratio of signal power to noise power (SNR) expressed in number of stars (x-axis) is given in Fig. 2. It is striking that the modus is 3 (as compared to 2 in the corresponding figure 4 of the subadult work), while the frequency of SNR=1 is higher for the adults as compared with the subadults. Consequently, the average SNR is the same for adults and subadults.

Figure 2. The frequency distribution of the absolute number of recordings (y-axis) over the ratio of signal power to noise power (SNR) expressed in number of stars (x-axis).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The average SNR over 605 recordings is 2.49.

We were not able to conduct inter-observer reliability tests, because nearly all recordings were taken by one person: Hetty van de Rijt-Plooij. In our previous article22 on immature audio recordings, we describe an intra-observer reliability test conducted on videotape of infant chimps. This video presented many challenges for scoring: the focal infant was playing with another infant, a few other individuals were present, and many interactions occurred in a short period of time. The results of the test were satisfactory and only minor/subtle mistakes were made. The conditions under which the recordings of adults were made presented fewer such challenges, and we are confident that the recordist accurately identified the individual calling and other key information recorded for each call.

Usage Notes

‘Individual(s) with sound/call type’ (Column K of the metadata spreadsheet ‘AdultDirSounds 11Dec14Final.xls’) gives the names of all vocalizing individuals together with the vocalization(s) they produce. A note of ‘uncertain’ behind a name means the recordist is not quite sure the vocalization came from that individual; ‘UN’ means ‘unknown individual(s)’; ‘GEN’ means ‘General’ or ‘the whole group’; ALL means all individuals present; HUM means ‘human’; BAB means ‘baboon’. The names plus vocalization are separated by ‘,‘ (comma). This column makes ‘cross-references’ superfluous. The Grammar of column K is as follows:

  1. A comma followed by a single space separates vocalizations following each other immediately, or between the last vocalization of one individual and the name of the next individual in the sequence. All the vocalizations between two names belong to the individual of the first name.

  2. ‘…’ indicates that some time passes by between one vocalization and the next.

  3. Parenthical comments, such as ‘(huu)’, which is a Dutch dipthong, ‘(hoo)’, ‘(soft)’ or other remarks after the name of the vocalization describes how the vocalization sounds or gives a qualification or a general remark concerning the sound or the recording process. Whenever it says: ‘ recording needle trembling’, the literal translation of the original note would be ‘recording knob shaking’. However, because we do not understand how such a knob can shake, it is translated instead as ‘needle trembling’.

  4. ‘General’ means: the whole group.

In Column L (‘Context of vocalizations’) of the metadata spreadsheet ‘AdultDirSounds11Dec14Final.xls’ a more general behavioural context is given of the vocalizations involved in the recording. Whenever numbers are used, these refer to the distance categories as defined on page 24 of ref. 37. Each number concerns the distance of the individual having the number to the one other individual in the group having no number.

Additional information

Table 2 is only available in the online version of this paper.

How to cite this article: Plooij, F. X. et al. An archive of longitudinal recordings of the vocalizations of adult Gombe chimpanzees. Sci. Data 2:150027 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.27 (2015).

Supplementary Material

sdata201527-isa1.zip (4.1KB, zip)

Acknowledgments

The field work of Hetty van de Rijt-Plooij and Frans X. Plooij from 1971–73 was made possible by financial support of the Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research (W.O.T.R.O. Grant No. W84-66). All the work was done in accordance with the regulations of Tanzania National Parks. A grant from the Jane Goodall Institute’s (JGI) Center for Primate Studies at the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-St Paul, USA provided funding for preparation of the materials for archiving. Preparation of the metadata was supported by the National Science Foundation (LTREB-1052693). Two short-term visiting fellowships from the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) through a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation (EF-0905606) enabled Frans Plooij to translate the metadata. Harold Bauer, who was a colleague in the Gombe National Park and published on chimpanzee and human vocal production[14–18], volunteered a month of his time to this project during which he visited Frans Plooij in the Netherlands, helped construct the excel spreadsheets for the translation of the metadata, and personally carried the reels with the analogue audiotapes from the Netherlands to the Macaulay Library. Karen Cranston created the derived information in the spreadsheet ‘AdultDirSounds11Dec14Final.xls’ and compiled the data for the Tables. Some parts of the present paper are verbatim from 22; its original publication was under a CC-BY license.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Data Citations

  1. Van de Rijt-Plooij H. H. 2014. Macaulay Library at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://macaulaylibrary.org/search?&recordist=H.%20H%20van%20de%20Rijt-Plooij&recordist_id=1330&age=4&sort=21
  2. Plooij F. X., Van de Rijt-Plooij H. H., Fischer M., Pusey A. 2015. Dryad. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.sd15m

References

  1. Goodall J. The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Patterns of Behavior. (Harvard University Press, 1986). [Google Scholar]
  2. Reynolds V., Reynolds F. in Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, (ed. DeVore I. 368–424 (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965). [Google Scholar]
  3. Ghiglieri M. The Chimpanzees of Kibale Forest: A Field Study of Ecology and Social Structure. (Columbia University Press, 1984). [Google Scholar]
  4. Wilson M. L., Hauser M. D. & Wrangham R. W. Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Animal Behaviour 61, 1203–1216 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  5. Crockford C. et al. Wild Chimpanzees produce group-specific calls: a case for vocal learning? Ethology 110, 221–243 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilson M. L., Hauser M. D. & Wrangham R. W. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) modify grouping and vocal behaviour in response to location-specific risk. Behaviour 144, 1621–1621 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  7. Herbinger I. et al. Vocal, gestural and locomotor responses of wild chimpanzees to familiar and unfamiliar intruders: a playback study. Animal Behaviour 78, 1389–1396 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  8. Schel A. M. et al. Chimpanzee food calls are directed at specific individuals. Animal Behaviour 86, 955–965 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. Gruber T. & Zuberbühler K. Vocal recruitment for joint travel in wild chimpanzees. PLoS One 8, e76073–e76082 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fedurek P. et al. Pant hoot chorusing and social bonds in male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 86, 189–196 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Fedurek P., Schel A. & Slocombe K. The acoustic structure of chimpanzee pant-hooting facilitates chorusing. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, 1781–1789 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedurek P., Donnellan E. & Slocombe K. E. Social and ecological correlates of long-distance pant hoot calls in male chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, 1345–1355 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. Watson S. K. et al. Vocal learning in the functionally referential food grunts of chimpanzees. Current Biology 25, 495–499 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bauer H. & Philip M. M. Facial and vocal individual recognition in the common chimpanzee. The Psychological Record 33, 161–170 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  15. Kent R. D. & Bauer H. R. Vocalizations of one-year-olds. J. Child Lang. 12, 491–526 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  16. Bauer H. R. A comparative study of common chimpanzee and human infant sounds, in Current perspectives in primate social dynamics (eds. Taub D. & King F. ) 327–345 (van Nostrand, 1986). [Google Scholar]
  17. Bauer H. R. & Kent R. D. Acoustic analysis of infant fricative and trill vocalizations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 505–511 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Berntson G. G. et al. Conspecific screams and laughter: Cardiac and behavioral reactions of infant chimpanzees. Developmental Psychobiology 22, 771–787 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Arbib M. A., Liebal K. & Pika S. Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language. Current Anthropology 49, 1053–1076 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fedurek P. & Slocombe K. E. Primate vocal communication: A useful tool for understanding human speech and language evolution? Human Biology 83, 153–173 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. See A. in Evolution of Social Communication in Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach Vol. 1 Interdisciplinary Evolution Research (eds. Pina M. & Gontier N. ) 195–215 (Springer, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  22. Plooij F. X. et al. Longitudinal recordings of the vocalizations of immature Gombe chimpanzees for developmental studies. Sci. Data 1, 140025 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marler P., Mitani J. C. in Primate Vocal Communication (eds. Todt, D., Goedeking P. & Symmens D. ) 3–14 (Springer, 1988). [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitani J. et al. Dialects in wild chimpanzees? Am. J. Primatol. 27, 233–243 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitani J. C., Hunley K. L. & Murdoch M. E. Geographic variation in the calls of wild chimpanzees: A reassessment. Am. J. Primatol. 47, 133–151 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marshall A. J., Wrangham R. W. & Arcadi A. C. Does learning affect the structure of vocalizations in chimpanzees? Animal Behaviour 58, 825–830 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marler P. Animal Communication Signals: We are beginning to understand how the structure of animal signals relates to the function they serve. Science 157, 769–774 (1967). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Marler P. & Hobbett L. Individuality in a long-range vocalization of wild chimpanzees. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 38, 97–109 (1975). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marler P., Tenaza R. in How Animals Communicate (ed. Sebeok T. A. 965–1033 (Indiana University Press, 1977). [Google Scholar]
  30. Uhlenbroek C. The Structure and Function of the Long-distance Calls Given by Male Chimpanzees in Gombe National Park. (University of Bristol, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  31. Fitch W. T. Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1213–1222 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harris T. R. et al. Black and white colobus monkey (Colobus guereza) roars as a source of both honest and exaggerated information about body mass. Ethology 112, 911–920 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  33. Charlton B. D. et al. Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait. Journal of Experimental Biology 214, 3414–3422 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pusey A. E. et al. The influence of ecological and social factors on body mass of wild chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology 26, 3–31 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  35. Crockford C. et al. Wild chimpanzees inform ignorant group members of danger. Current Biology 22, 142–146 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wrangham R.W. Artificial feeding of chimpanzees and baboons in their natural habitat. Animal Behaviour 22, 83–93 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  37. Plooij F. The Behavioral Development of Free-living Chimpanzee Babies and Infants. Monographs on Infancy (ed. Lipsitt L. P. vol. 3, 1–207 (Ablex Publishing, 1984). [Google Scholar]
  38. Strier K. B. et al. The Primate Life History Database: A unique shared ecological data resource. Methods Ecol. Evol 1, 199–211 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Van de Rijt-Plooij H. H. 2014. Macaulay Library at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://macaulaylibrary.org/search?&recordist=H.%20H%20van%20de%20Rijt-Plooij&recordist_id=1330&age=4&sort=21
  2. Plooij F. X., Van de Rijt-Plooij H. H., Fischer M., Pusey A. 2015. Dryad. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.sd15m

Supplementary Materials

sdata201527-isa1.zip (4.1KB, zip)

Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES