Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0129239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129239

The Stapled AKAP Disruptor Peptide STAD-2 Displays Antimalarial Activity through a PKA-Independent Mechanism

Briana R Flaherty 1,2, Yuxiao Wang 3, Edward C Trope 1, Tienhuei G Ho 3, Vasant Muralidharan 2,4, Eileen J Kennedy 3,*, David S Peterson 1,2,*
Editor: Sanjai Kumar5
PMCID: PMC4444124  PMID: 26010880

Abstract

Drug resistance poses a significant threat to ongoing malaria control efforts. Coupled with lack of a malaria vaccine, there is an urgent need for the development of new antimalarials with novel mechanisms of action and low susceptibility to parasite drug resistance. Protein Kinase A (PKA) has been implicated as a critical regulator of pathogenesis in malaria. Therefore, we sought to investigate the effects of disrupted PKA signaling as a possible strategy for inhibition of parasite replication. Host PKA activity is partly regulated by a class of proteins called A Kinase Anchoring Proteins (AKAPs), and interaction between HsPKA and AKAP can be inhibited by the stapled peptide Stapled AKAP Disruptor 2 (STAD-2). STAD-2 was tested for permeability to and activity against Plasmodium falciparum blood stage parasites in vitro. The compound was selectively permeable only to infected red blood cells (iRBC) and demonstrated rapid antiplasmodial activity, possibly via iRBC lysis (IC50 ≈ 1 μM). STAD-2 localized within the parasite almost immediately post-treatment but showed no evidence of direct association with PKA, indicating that STAD-2 acts via a PKA-independent mechanism. Furosemide-insensitive parasite permeability pathways in the iRBC were largely responsible for uptake of STAD-2. Further, peptide import was highly specific to STAD-2 as evidenced by low permeability of control stapled peptides. Selective uptake and antiplasmodial activity of STAD-2 provides important groundwork for the development of stapled peptides as potential antimalarials. Such peptides may also offer an alternative strategy for studying protein-protein interactions critical to parasite development and pathogenesis.

Introduction

Malaria, caused by haemoprotozoan parasites of the genus Plasmodium, is endemic to nearly 100 countries, placing the lives of an estimated 3.2 billion people at risk each year. Despite widespread endemicity, intensified control efforts have reduced annual malaria-attributable deaths by approximately 47% from nearly 1 million in 2000 to 584 000 in 2013 [1]. Such advances in malaria control are critically dependent on effective disease diagnosis and efficacious drugs. Of the five species of Plasmodium currently known to infect humans, P. falciparum is the most pathogenic, accounting for the majority of malaria-related deaths, while P. vivax has a wider geographic distribution owing to its ability to survive in higher altitudes and cooler climates [1]. Since 2002, artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) has been the recommended first line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria [2], and chloroquine is recommended for P. vivax in regions where it remains efficacious [1]. However, extensive resistance to all existing antimalarials, including growing resistance to artemisinin in the Greater Mekong Subregion, threatens to place control efforts, and millions of lives, in jeopardy [35].

As the threat of widespread artemisinin resistance looms, there is a growing need for antimalarials that are less vulnerable to parasite mechanisms of drug resistance. To date, all existing antimalarials, as well as most of those being pursued as potential candidates [610], are small molecule inhibitors. These drugs typically act by binding within tight, hydrophobic pockets of target proteins. Although many factors contribute to the development of drug resistant parasites, the binding restrictions of these small molecule inhibitors render them inherently vulnerable to loss of activity via random genetic mutations in the parasite. Most existing antimalarials have lost efficacy as a result of protein mutations that inhibit binding either to their target protein or to parasite transporters [11]. For example, mutations of residues within the binding pocket of the parasite’s dihydrofolate reductase led to resistance towards cycloguanil and pyrimethamine [12,13]; single mutations within the binding pocket of cytochrome b generated resistance to atovaquone [1416]; mutations within the binding pockets of parasite transporters PfCRT and PfMDR1 eliminated activity of chloroquine and many ACT partner drugs (such as mefloquine and lumefantrine) [17,18]; and new evidence suggests mutations in the PfKelch13 propeller domain may be responsible for rising resistance to artemisinin [1921]. As the search for the next antimalarial intensifies, there is an urgent need for new classes of inhibitors that act via unique mechanisms of action and possess reduced vulnerability to parasite drug resistance.

Stapled peptides are a novel class of inhibitors that can be designed to bind protein interfaces with high specificity and thereby block intra- or inter-molecular protein-protein interactions [22,23]. Unlike traditional protein therapeutics which are largely limited to extracellular targets, peptide stapling affords the ability to target a myriad of flat, elongated intracellular surfaces with high specificity due to its increased propensity for cell penetration [24]. Although many stapled peptides were originally engineered for various cancer targets [24,25], their unique potential as antimicrobial agents has recently been explored [2628]. However, stapled peptides have not yet been tested in Plasmodium.

In the following study, we examined the permeability and activity of the stapled peptide, STAD-2, in P. falciparum infected red blood cells (iRBC) [29]. This peptide was originally designed to disrupt interaction between the regulatory subunits of human Protein Kinase A (PKA) and A Kinase Anchoring Proteins (AKAPs). PKA is a cAMP-dependent protein kinase that is critical for a wide variety of cellular processes. HsPKA activity is highly regulated and dependent on multiple factors including intracellular cAMP concentrations and spatial and temporal localization via AKAP interactions [3033]. AKAPs typically bind to the docking and dimerization domain (D/D) interface formed between two PKA regulatory (PKA-R) subunits. This docking site serves to recruit PKA to distinct subcellular locations and is a critical component of PKA regulation [29,30]. In P. falciparum, parasite PKA plays an important role in pathogenesis including regulation of protein phosphorylation, transport of molecules across the RBC membrane, and activation of “new permeability pathways” [34,35]. Further, RBCs release ATP in response to infection with Plasmodium parasites, which subsequently activates extracellular receptors to increase intracellular cAMP concentrations, thereby activating PKA. This signaling can ultimately cause deformations in the plasma membrane of both uninfected and infected RBCs [36]. While the role of AKAPs in healthy RBCs is poorly understood, recent work has shown that AKAPs play a critical role in RBC membrane stiffness and adhesion [37]. On the other hand, little is known regarding AKAPs in iRBCs; however, bioinformatics analyses have identified an ortholog of the P. yoelii AKAP within the P. falciparum genome [38]. In addition, subcellular localization of PfPKA is thought to be critical for PfPKA activity within iRBCs, suggesting a vital role for AKAPs in P. falciparum pathogenesis [39]. Much remains to be discovered regarding the roles of PKA and AKAPs in P. falciparum iRBCs as well as the interplay between parasite and host PKA in regulating PKA-dependent cellular processes.

Since many questions remain about the roles of HsPKA and PfPKA on P. falciparum pathogenesis and since the role of AKAPs is not well established in RBCs, we sought to explore the effects of treatment of P. falciparum iRBCs with the AKAP disruptor peptide STAD-2 (Stapled AKAP Disruptor 2). This work builds upon previous studies by Wang et al. which showed STAD-2 peptides were cell permeable in various mammalian cell lines and highly effective at inhibiting the intracellular interaction between HsPKA-RII and AKAPs [29]. Although some important differences exist between PfPKA and its human ortholog [38,40], PfPKA was previously suggested as a promising antimalarial target [34,38]. Therefore, we sought to explore whether PKA could be exploited as a potential target for inhibiting parasite pathogenesis. STAD-2 was found to be selectively permeable to iRBC and, unexpectedly, demonstrated rapid antiplasmodial activity via a PKA-independent mechanism. Furosemide-insensitive, parasite-derived permeability appears to play a significant role in iRBC import of the compound. STAD-2 localized within the intracellular parasite but was not observed within the RBC cytosol. Further, STAD-2 did not clearly associate with the regulatory subunits of PKA, indicating STAD-2 likely acts through an alternative mechanism for inhibited parasite viability. This is the first example of uptake of a stapled peptide by P. falciparum-iRBCs, and these findings provide important groundwork for the development of stapled peptides for malaria-specific targets.

Materials and Methods

Blood and Reagents

Human O+ red blood cells were either purchased from Interstate Blood Bank, Inc. or donated by healthy volunteers. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Georgia (no. 2013102100); all donors signed consent forms. Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals and reagents for this study were either purchased from Sigma Aldrich or Fisher Scientific.

Parasite Culture and Synchronization

Plasmodium falciparum strains CS2, 3D7, Hb3, and Dd2 were maintained in continuous culture according to routine methods. Parasites were cultured at 4% hematocrit in O+ red blood cells. Cultures were maintained in 25 cm2 or 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks at 37°C under a gas mixture of 90% nitrogen/5% oxygen/5% carbon dioxide and in complete culture medium made up of RPMI containing 25 mM HEPES, 0.05 mg/mL hypoxanthine, 2.2 mg/mL NaHCO3 (J.T. Baker), 0.5% Albumax (Gibco), 2 g/L glucose, and 0.01 mg/mL gentamicin. Primarily ring-stage cultures were treated routinely with 5% D-Sorbitol to achieve synchronous cultures. Unless otherwise stated, experiments were carried out using the CS2 parasite strain.

STAD-2 Synthesis and Purification

Peptides were synthesized and purified as previously described [29].

STAD-2 Permeability

Synchronous ring-stage or late-stage infected red blood cells (iRBC) and uninfected red blood cells (uRBC) were brought up to 4% hematocrit in complete culture medium. FITC-conjugated peptides were added to a final concentration of 1 μM, and cultures were incubated for 6 hours at 37°C under standard gas conditions. Following incubation, 25 μL cell mixture was removed and treated with 100 μL 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 10 minutes at 37°C. Cells were subsequently washed once in 1 mL 1X PBS, resuspended in 300 μL 1X PBS, and analyzed for Hoechst and FITC staining on a Beckman Coulter CyAn flow cytometer. 500,000 events were collected at a rate of 15,000–20,000 events per second. Data was analyzed using FlowJo X single cell analysis software (FlowJo LLC).

Dose-Response Curves

Synchronous ring-stage or late-stage iRBC at <0.5% parasitemia were brought up to 4% hematocrit in complete culture medium and transferred to a 24-well tissue culture plate in 1 mL aliquots. Wells were then brought up to final concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, or 5 μM STAD-2 or STAD-2 scramble. 25 μL were removed from each well at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours, stained with 100 μL 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 10 minutes at 37°C, and analyzed by flow cytometry as described above. IC50 values were determined according to parasitemia at 24 hours post-treatment. Parasitemia was defined as the percent of Hoechst-positive RBCs as measured by flow cytometry.

Parasite Viability Assay

Ring-stage or late-stage iRBC at <0.5% parasitemia were brought up to 4% hematocrit in complete culture medium and transferred to a 24-well tissue culture plate in 1 mL aliquots. iRBCs were then treated with 1 μM STAD-2, 1 μM scrambled STAD-2, or 0.001% DMSO (vehicle control). 25 μL were removed from each well every 24 hours post-treatment, and samples were stained with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed by flow cytometry. Blood smears were made every 24 hours, fixed with methanol, and stained with Giemsa for analysis by light microscopy. Images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse E400 microscope fitted with a Nikon Digital Sight DS-5M-L1 camera (Nikon Instruments Inc.).

Hemolysis

Synchronous late-stage iRBC were mixed with uRBC in order to achieve a series of samples with stepwise decreasing parasitemia. Samples were brought up to 4% hematocrit in complete culture medium containing 1 μM STAD-2, 1 μM STAD-2 scramble, or 0.001% DMSO and transferred to a 48-well tissue culture plate in 200 μL aliquots in duplicate. The plate was incubated at 37°C under standard gas conditions for 6 hours. Following incubation, all samples were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 700 rcf for 5 minutes to pellet cells. 100 μL of supernatant was removed from each tube and transferred to a 96-well, flat-bottom tissue culture plate. Oxyhemoglobin absorbance was measured at 415 nm using a SpectraMax Plus microplate spectrophotometer with SoftMax Pro 5.4 software (Molecular Devices, LLC).

Fluorescence Microscopy

A culture of primarily late-stage 3D7 iRBC was brought up to 4% hematocrit in complete culture medium and transferred to a 24-well plate at 1 mL per well. FITC-conjugated STAD-2 or scrambled STAD-2 were added to a final concentration of 1 μM, and cultures were incubated for 10 minutes or 3 hours at 37°C under standard gas conditions. Following incubation, 50 μL of cell mixture was removed and immediately stained with 200 μL 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 10 minutes at 37°C. Cells were washed once with 1 mL 1X PBS, resuspended in 200 μL 4% paraformaldehyde/0.0075% glutaraldehyde, and deposited on coverslips pre-treated with 0.01% poly-L-lysine (Sigma Diagnostics) for 10 minutes. Post-fixation, coverslips were washed three times with 1X PBS, mounted on a glass microscope slide (Globe Scientific Inc.) with Fluoro-Gel anti-fading solution (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and sealed. Cells were imaged with a DeltaVision II microscope system using an Olympus IX-71 inverted microscope and a CoolSnap HQ2 CCD camera. Focal planes were selected based on transmitted light images. 0.2 μm z-stacks were acquired and deconvolved using SoftWorx 5.5 acquisition software (Applied Precision, Inc.).

Immunofluorescence Assays

A culture of primarily late-stage iRBC was incubated with STAD-2 or DMSO as described above. Following incubation, 50 μL of cell mixture was removed and washed twice with 1 mL 1X PBS. Cells were then resuspended in 200 μL 4% paraformaldehyde/0.0075% glutaraldehyde and transferred to a CC2 glass chamber slide (Nalge Nunc International). Cells were fixed for 30 minutes at room temperature and gently washed twice with 300 μL 1X PBS. Fixed cells were subsequently permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 minutes and washed. Cells were then treated with 0.1 μg/mL sodium borohydride/PBS for 10 minutes to reduce any free aldehyde groups, washed with 1X PBS, and blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with 3% BSA/PBS. Following blocking, cells were brought up in 200 μL primary antibody and left shaking at 4°C overnight. The following morning, cells were washed three times, for 10 minutes each, to remove excess primary antibody and brought up in 200 μL secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing, cells were counterstained with 200 μL 0.5 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 3 minutes at room temperature and washed a final time before removing slide chambers, mounting a coverslip with Fluoro-Gel, and sealing. Rat anti-PfPKA-R was generously donated by Gordon Langsley (Institut Cochin) and diluted 1:300 in 3% BSA/PBS. Goat anti-HsPKA-RII (Abcam) was diluted to 10 μg/mL in 3% BSA/PBS. AlexFluor647 chicken anti-rat and AlexaFluor 647 donkey anti-goat secondary antibodies were diluted 1:500 in 3% BSA/PBS.

Immunoprecipitation/Mass Spectrometry

4 X 108 3D7 parasites were lysed with cold 0.04% saponin in PBS for 10 minutes. The supernatant was, subsequently, separated from the pellet by centrifugation at 4000 rcf for 10 minutes at 4°C. This supernatant consisted of the RBC cytoplasm and parasite exported proteins (termed host supernatant). The pellet consisted of parasite cells; these were further lysed with cold 0.5% PBS. The soluble fraction (termed parasite supernatant) of the parasite cells was separated from the insoluble fraction by centrifuging the parasite lysate at 4000 rcf for 10 minutes at 4°C. The host supernatant and the parasite supernatant were each incubated with biotin-conjugated STAD-2 or STAD-2 scramble for 16 hours at 4°C. Peptide-protein complexes were precipitated using streptavidin-coupled Dynabeads (Life Technologies). Dynabeads were subsequently washed four times with 1X PBS, and the precipitated peptide-protein complexes were solubilized in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Proteins were, then, fractionated on 10% SDS-PAGE, excised, and identified by MS-MS (Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, University of Georgia).

Sequences identified by MS-MS were searched against the NCBI non-redundant protein databases for Plasmodium falciparum (NCBI taxonomy #5833) and human (#9606)/Plasmodium (#5820) and analyzed by Mascot. Results from both database searches were cross-referenced and compiled. Proteins identified for STAD-2 and STAD-2 scramble treated lysates were compared and duplicates removed to yield a final list of STAD-2-specific protein interactions. Results are ordered by Mascot ions score (http://www.matrixscience.com/help/interpretation_help.html#SCORING). Generally, scores above 40 are considered possible interactions while scores above approximately 70 are considered good matches. All identified hits with a Mascot score above 40 are included in the supplementary tables.

Coincubation Assays

Late-stage cultures were brought up to 4% hematocrit in complete culture medium and transferred to a 48-well tissue culture plate at 250 μL per well. Plates were spun at 330 rcf for 5 minutes, the medium was aspirated, and cultures were resuspended in either 250 μL complete culture medium or 200 μM furosemide in complete culture medium for 10 minutes at 37°C. Plates were again spun at 330 rcf, aspirated, and resuspended in 250 μL 1 μM STAD-2, 5% D-Sorbitol, 200 μM furosemide, 130 mM glycerol, 6 μM AgNO3, or a combination of the aforementioned for 10 minutes or 2 hours. Following incubation, 25 μL were removed, stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry as described above. Ten-minute time points served as controls for 5% D-Sorbitol and furosemide activities while effects on STAD-2 uptake were determined using 2-hour time points.

Statistical Analysis

Graphing and statistical analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

STAD-2 is selectively permeable to infected red blood cells

STAD-2 was designed to target the regulatory subunit of HsPKA and occlude AKAP binding interactions as previously described [29] (Fig 1). To study the effects of STAD-2 in Plasmodium-infected red blood cells (iRBC), STAD-2 permeability was first examined by incubating 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 peptides with uninfected red blood cells (uRBC) and CS2 iRBC for 6 hours. Subsequent staining with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 enabled separation of uninfected from infected red blood cells based on their DNA content. Analysis by flow cytometry showed significant permeability of STAD-2 in iRBC while only a nominal amount was permeable to uRBC (Fig 2A). Cell permeability patterns were consistent across other parasite strains tested (S1 Fig) and reached near-maximum levels by 3 hours post-treatment (S2 Fig).

Fig 1. STAD-2 synthesis and function.

Fig 1

(A) STAD-2 and STAD-2 scramble were synthesized by substituting S-pentenyl alanine (S5, shown as *) into positions that are opposite to the binding surface targeting PKA-R. A helical wheel represents the STAD-2 secondary structure wherein hydrophobic residues are shown in red, S5 in black, and other residues in grey. (B) Fmoc chemistry was used to synthesize STAD-2 peptides containing the non-natural S5 residues at i, i+4 positions. Ring-closing metathesis was performed using Grubbs I catalyst to generate the hydrocarbon staple. (C) The interaction between the HsPKA D/D domain (pale cyan) and the docking sequence of an AKAP (orange) can be inhibited by the stapled disruptor peptide STAD-2 (red). STAD-2 mimics the docking sequence of an AKAP and disrupts binding to the regulatory subunit of PKA. Images were created using the crystal structure of PKA-RII (PDB access code: 2HWN [41]).

Fig 2. STAD-2 peptides are selectively permeable to Plasmodium-infected red blood cells.

Fig 2

(A) Plasmodium-iRBC were treated for 6 hours with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 and analyzed by flow cytometry. iRBC showed selective permeability to STAD-2 relative to uRBC. (B, C) Treatment of synchronous ring-stage (black bars) or late-stage (grey bars) cultures with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2, unstapled STAD-2 parent, or STAD-2 scramble demonstrated significantly increased uptake of STAD-2 by late-stage relative to ring-stage iRBC. However, both ring-stage and late-stage iRBC were minimally permeable to STAD-2 parent and STAD-2 scramble controls (2way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest, p<0.001, n = 3–6, mean ± S.E.).

P. falciparum has a blood stage life cycle of 44–48 hours wherein parasites upregulate new permeability pathways during the later stages of development. These pathways serve to facilitate uptake of solutes that are essential for parasite growth and division and are marked by the upregulation of a unique Plasmodium surface anion channel (PSAC) [42]. In order to examine the influence of parasite stage on uptake of STAD-2, iRBC were synchronized using 5% D-Sorbitol, and peptide permeability was measured in ring- and late-stage parasites. Late-stage iRBC demonstrated significantly increased uptake of STAD-2 relative to ring-stage parasites, consistent with the increased permeability of late-stage iRBC (Fig 2B and 2C). As controls, iRBC were also treated with the unstapled STAD-2 parent peptide as well as a scrambled version of STAD-2 possessing identical chemical composition but a scrambled amino acid sequence (Fig 1A). Permeability of these controls was almost negligible as measured by flow cytometry (Fig 2B and 2C), demonstrating selective uptake of STAD-2 by iRBC.

STAD-2 reduces parasite viability

Since STAD-2 was selectively permeable to iRBC, we wanted to determine whether STAD-2 treatment had an effect on parasite viability in vitro. We first treated ring- and late-stage iRBC with 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 μM STAD-2 or STAD-2 scramble for 24 hours and subsequently determined parasitemia relative to DMSO-treated controls. While treatment with the scramble control had negligible effects on parasite viability at all concentrations tested, a concentration-dependent decrease in parasitemia was observed in STAD-2-treated iRBC 24 hour post-treatment (Fig 3A). Consistent with increased STAD-2 permeability in late-stage iRBC (Fig 2B and 2C), late-stage parasites were slightly more susceptible to STAD-2 inhibition (IC50 ≈ 1 μM) than ring-stage parasites (IC50 ≈ 1.5 μM).

Fig 3. STAD-2 reduces viability of P. falciparum in vitro.

Fig 3

(A) Synchronous ring- or late-stage iRBC were treated with 0, 0.5, 1, 2, or 5 μM STAD-2 or its scramble control, and parasitemia was determined by flow cytometry at 24-hours post-treatment. STAD-2 IC50 ≈ 1 μM for late-stage and 1.5 μM for ring-stage parasites (n = 3, mean ± S.E., red = STAD-2/late, blue = STAD-2/ring, orange = STAD-2 scramble/late, green = STAD-2 scramble/ring). (B) Synchronous iRBC were treated with 1 μM STAD-2 or STAD-2 scramble, and parasitemia was determined by flow cytometry at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-treatment. A significant decrease in parasitemia was seen with STAD-2 treatment of both ring- and late-stage iRBC (2way ANOVA, p<0.001, n = 3, mean ± S.E., red = STAD-2/late, blue = STAD-2/ring, orange = STAD-2 scramble/late, green = STAD-2 scramble/ring). (C) Analysis of cells from (B) by light microscopy showed STAD-2 treated iRBC to be morphologically indistinguishable from untreated controls. (D) Late-stage iRBC of increasing parasitemia were treated with 1 μM STAD-2, 1 μM STAD-2 scramble, or DMSO control for 6 hours. Since the presence of oxyhemoglobin is indicative of red blood cell lysis, culture medium was removed and analyzed for evidence of oxyhemoglobin (A415) by UV-Vis spectroscopy. Linear regression demonstrates positive correlation of cell lysis with increasing parasitemia and significantly increased lysis in STAD-2 treated cells relative to STAD-2 scramble and DMSO controls (p<0.0001, n = 4).

To further explore the effects of STAD-2 on parasite viability in vitro, synchronous ring- and late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM STAD-2 or scrambled STAD-2, and parasitemia was determined by flow cytometry in conjunction with light microscopy every 24 hours for 72 hours post-treatment. Again, STAD-2 scramble had no effect on parasite viability whereas both late- and ring-stage iRBC had significantly decreased parasitemias relative to their DMSO controls by 48 hours post-STAD-2 treatment (Fig 3B, p<0.001). STAD-2, likewise, inhibited several other parasite strains tested (S3 Fig). Interestingly, the morphology of STAD-2-treated iRBC did not differ from DMSO controls (Fig 3B).

Throughout the previous experiments, it was noticed that parasitemia was decreased as early as 6 hours post-treatment as detected by flow cytometry (S4 Fig). This, combined with the lack of morphological effects following STAD-2 treatment (Fig 3B), led us to explore whether STAD-2 was inducing lysis of iRBC. To test this hypothesis, we prepared serial dilutions of late-stage iRBC in uRBC in order to achieve a series of samples ranging from 0 to 8% parasitemia. We then treated the samples with 1 μM STAD-2 or STAD-2 scramble for 6 hours and quantified cell lysis by measuring the absorbance of oxyhemoglobin in the sample medium (A415). While levels of lysis induced by STAD-2 scramble were essentially identical to DMSO controls, STAD-2-induced lysis was significantly greater than controls and directly correlated with increasing parasitemia (Fig 3D). Hence, we propose that STAD-2-induced cell lysis is specific to P. falciparum infected cells.

STAD-2 traffics to the intracellular parasite

Currently, there is nothing known concerning AKAPs in relation to P. falciparum iRBC. Thus, we wanted to probe whether STAD-2 localized within the host red blood cell or within the parasite. In order to determine intracellular localization of FITC-conjugated STAD-2, iRBC were treated and stained as before and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Repeated analyses found that STAD-2 consistently localized within the parasite but rarely within the parasite digestive vacuole (Fig 4A). At no point was STAD-2 observed within the red blood cell cytosol. This pattern of peptide localization was consistent in both fixed and unfixed cells as well as both undivided (trophozoite) and divided (schizont) late-stage parasites. In addition, we found that STAD-2 quickly reached intracellular parasites, localizing within parasites as early as 20 minutes post-treatment, and maintained an identical pattern of localization as late as 6 hours post-treatment (Fig 4B.). Thus, selective uptake and localization of STAD-2 seems independent of any changes in parasite morphology during late-stage development.

Fig 4. STAD-2 rapidly localizes within the parasitophorous vacuole.

Fig 4

(A) 3D7 iRBC were treated with 1 μM STAD-2 or STAD-2 scramble, stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342, and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. STAD-2 peptides consistently localized within the intracellular parasite and at much higher levels than its scrambled control. (B) iRBC treated for 20 minutes, 3 hours, or 6 hours with 1 μM STAD-2 showed that STAD-2 traffics to the parasitophorous vacuole by 20 minutes post-treatment.

STAD-2 does not associate with PKA

Since STAD-2 localizes within the parasite and not within the cytoplasm of the red blood cell, we wanted to determine if STAD-2 targets PKA within the parasite. We first addressed this question using immunofluorescence assays of iRBC treated with FITC-conjugated STAD-2 and probed with either anti-PfPKA R or anti-HsPKA RII antibodies. STAD-2 did not definitively colocalize with either of the regulatory subunits tested in iRBC (Fig 5A), although lack of colocalization with HsPKA can likely be attributed to the compound’s inability to accumulate in the RBC cytoplasm. Likewise, coimmunoprecipitation experiments using biotin-conjugated STAD-2 did not yield detectable levels of the probed PKA subunits by western blotting (data not shown) nor were they evident as interacting partners when analyzed by mass spectrometry (S1 Table and S2 Table). Finally, we compared the effects of treatment with STAD-2 to those of the PKA small molecule inhibitor, H89. Both STAD-2 and H89 were applied at their relative IC50 values (1 μM and 30 μM, S5 Fig) and analyzed by blood smears at 48 hours post-treatment. Although STAD-2-treated iRBC did not differ morphologically from DMSO controls, H89-treated iRBC consistently showed clear morphological changes including the notable absence of a digestive vacuole (Fig 5B). Thus, we suggest that STAD-2 may act via an alternate mechanism that does not involve disruption of PKA signaling.

Fig 5. STAD-2 does not associate with PKA.

Fig 5

(A) Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 2 hours and probed for P. falciparum PKA-R (top panel) or H. sapiens PKA-RII (bottom panel). STAD-2 did not show clear colocalization with either of the regulatory subunits. (B) Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM STAD-2, 30 μM H89 (small molecule inhibitor of PKA), or 0.001% DMSO and analyzed by light microscopy at 48 hours post-treatment. H89-treated iRBC demonstrated clear absence of parasite digestive vacuoles while STAD-2 treated iRBC were indistinguishable from DMSO controls.

STAD-2 is internalized via unknown parasite permeability pathways

Although it is well established that Plasmodium parasites have increased permeability to extracellular solutes during the latter half of the blood-stage life cycle, many questions remain regarding the mechanisms of permeability. It is generally accepted that smaller solutes are imported via a PSAC that is upregulated by the parasite throughout the course of development; however considerably less is understood regarding uptake of larger solutes. In order to better understand how the relatively large ~2.5 kDa peptide, STAD-2, gains intracellular access to iRBC, we measured uptake of 1 μM STAD-2 in the presence of the PSAC inhibitor furosemide. Although STAD-2/furosemide co-treatment alone had no discernible effect on STAD-2 uptake, pre-incubation of iRBC with 200 μM furosemide followed by a 2-hour co-treatment showed a consistent but statistically insignificant decrease in STAD-2 uptake (Fig 6A). Thus, it appears that STAD-2 import does not heavily rely on the PSAC.

Fig 6. STAD-2 uptake is largely independent of the PSAC.

Fig 6

(A) Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM STAD-2 in the presence of 200 μM furosemide following pre-treatment with complete culture medium (Fur/STAD-2) or 200 μM furosemide (Fur/Fur/STAD-2). Treatment of late-stage iRBC with STAD-2 in the presence of furosemide demonstrated a visible, yet insignificant, decrease in STAD-2 uptake only when iRBC were pre-treated with furosemide (two-tailed t test, p = 0.0557, n = 3, mean ± S.E.). (B) Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM STAD-2 in the presence of 5% D-Sorbitol (PSAC solute), 130 mM glycerol (AQP3 solute), or 6 μM AgNO3 (AQP1 inhibitor). Treatment with STAD-2 in the presence of 5% D-Sorbitol yielded a decrease in STAD-2 uptake similar to that seen in (A) while treatment in the presence of glycerol or AgNO3 did not differ from STAD-2 alone (n = 2, mean ± S.E.).

Recent studies have shown that some AKAPs associate with membrane aquaporins and play a role in aquaporin phosphorylation and channel regulation within various cell types [43,44]. Although evidence suggests the presence of both aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and aquaporin 3 (AQP3) on the surface of healthy red blood cells [45], few studies have examined the role of membrane aquaporins in P. falciparum iRBC. However, AQP3 is thought to be the major glycerol channel in human erythrocytes and may play a role in the virulence of intraerythrocytic parasites [46]. To further explore the role of membrane transport mechanisms in STAD-2 uptake, we performed co-incubation experiments similar to those above using D-Sorbitol (PSAC solute), glycerol (AQP3 solute [47,48]), or AgNO3 (AQP1 inhibitor [49]). Co-incubation of iRBC with 1 μM STAD-2 and 130 mM glycerol or 6 μM AgNO3 yielded no apparent change in STAD-2 uptake; however, co-incubation with 5% D-Sorbitol resulted in a slight reduction of STAD-2 uptake that was comparable to that seen with furosemide (Fig 6B). Thus, although AQP1 and AQP3 are unlikely to play a role in STAD-2 uptake or activity, the PSAC may be responsible for a fraction of STAD-2 import. Nevertheless, we propose that none of the assessed means of transport greatly contribute to the uptake of STAD-2 by iRBC.

STAD-2 permeability is peptide-specific

Since none of the examined membrane channels contributed substantially to the uptake of STAD-2, we further explored the requirements of iRBC permeability by testing for uptake of a variety of different stapled, FITC-conjugated peptides. All peptides were applied at a concentration of 1 μM for 6 hours and analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described. The overall net charge and amino acid sequence of all peptides tested are shown in Table 1. The first series of peptides analyzed explored the influence of peptide charge on iRBC uptake (Fig 7A) while the second series examined uptake of other STAD peptides that were developed previously (Fig 7B) [29]. Unexpectedly, STAD-2 was the only peptide that demonstrated clear permeability to iRBC (Fig 7C) providing further evidence that iRBC uptake of STAD-2 is highly specific.

Table 1. Stapled Peptides.

Peptide Sequence Charge Length*
+2 Charged Beta-Ala S 5 K K L S 5 T T +2 8
+1 Charged Beta-Ala S 5 K G L S 5 T T +1 8
Neutral Charged Beta-Ala S 5 G G L S 5 T T 0 8
-1 Charged Beta-Ala S 5 E G L S 5 T T -1 8
-2 Charged Beta-Ala S 5 E E L S 5 T T -2 8
STAD-1 Beta-Ala K K Y A K Q L A D S 5 I I K S 5 A T E +2 18
STAD-2 Beta-Ala K K L A K F L V S S 5 A L K S 5 A L K +5 18
STAD-2 Scramble Beta-Ala K A L V K L A A L S 5 K F K S 5 L K S +5 18
STAD-3 Beta-Ala K K Y A Q R L S K K I V R A V S 5 Q W A S 5 +6 21

*Length in amino acids

Fig 7. STAD-2 is uniquely permeable to iRBC.

Fig 7

iRBC were treated for 6 hours with 1 μM stapled peptides of varying charges (A) or variants of STAD-2 (B), analyzed by flow cytometry, and reported as median fluorescence intensity (C, n = 2–6, mean ± S.E.). Of the various stapled peptides analyzed, only STAD-2 was clearly permeable to iRBC.

Discussion

With Plasmodium drug resistance on the rise, malaria control efforts are in desperate need of new antimalarials that are highly efficacious and largely refractory to parasite mechanisms of drug resistance. For the time being, artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) remains the WHO-recommended first line treatment for P. falciparum malaria. And, although resistance in the Greater Mekong Subregion has hampered the efficacy of artemisinin monotherapies, ACT currently remains highly effective at curing malaria provided it is paired with an efficacious partner drug [50]. However, mounting evidence of delayed clearance times places even ACTs in jeopardy and further underscores the need for new antimalarials [51].

In 2009, a high throughput phenotypic screen of nearly 2 million compounds from GlaxoSmithKline identified 13,533 compounds that inhibited growth of P. falciparum by greater than 80% at 2 μM concentration [52]. Of the compounds identified and validated in the study, a large majority were protein kinase inhibitors. Although P. falciparum has a relatively small kinome, composed of less than 100 identified kinases, many are highly divergent from those within the human host [40,53]. Furthermore, since many kinase signaling pathways are evolutionarily conserved, it has been suggested that a single kinase inhibitor might exhibit pluripotency and, therefore, reduced vulnerability to drug resistant mutations [53]. Thus, protein kinases represent promising candidates as future antimalarial targets.

In the present study, we explored the effects of the human AKAP disruptor peptide STAD-2 on P. falciparum iRBC. We demonstrated STAD-2 to be highly and selectively permeable to iRBC. In addition, STAD-2 effectively inhibited parasite viability at IC50 ≈ 1 μM. Surprisingly, analyses using antibodies specific to both P. falciparum and H. sapiens PKA regulatory subunits found no evidence of association of STAD-2 with human or parasite PKA within the iRBC. Likewise, parasite responses to treatment with the PKA small molecule inhibitor H89 differed considerably from treatment with STAD-2, providing further evidence that STAD-2 may not inhibit PKA regulation in iRBC. This is most likely due to the fact that STAD-2 does not accumulate in the RBC cytosol, yielding the human PKA-R target inaccessible, and PfPKA-R does not contain the conserved D/D domain that is targeted by STAD-2. However, since HsPKA-R is known to play a critical role in membrane stiffness and adhesion [37], it will be interesting to study the role of human AKAPs on Plasmodium-iRBCs through selective delivery of STAD-2 into the RBC cytoplasm. In an effort to dissect the mechanism of iRBC import of STAD-2, we found that intake was largely independent of the PSAC. In addition, import was highly sequence-specific since other stapled peptides, even some bearing very similar composition to STAD-2, were largely impermeable to iRBC.

This research provides the first support for the use of stapled peptides as potential candidates for exploring malaria-specific signaling and inhibition in RBCs. Although further study will be necessary to dissect the highly specific mechanisms of uptake seen with STAD-2, the selective permeability of stapled peptides to P. falciparum iRBC may ensure low cytotoxicity of future antimalarial stapled peptides.

As experiments examining the mechanism of peptide uptake did not show significant contributions by neither the PSAC nor resident RBC aquaporins, it remains unclear exactly how STAD-2 is imported into the parasite. Aside from the PSAC, permeability of iRBC is poorly understood. Various studies have shown high permeability of positively charged cell-penetrating peptides in P. falciparum-iRBC. These peptides typically possess octaarginine or octalysine structures and are thought to be taken up by endocytic mechanisms [5456]. Also, like STAD-2, cell-penetrating peptides demonstrate selective permeability to iRBC relative to healthy uRBC [57]. However, the lack of permeability of control positively charged peptides in this study, particularly STAD-2 scramble and STAD-3, suggests that there may be more at play here than non-selective endocytosis. Therefore, it is possible that STAD-2 may be imported through a specific protein interaction that dictates permeability.

Although efforts to identify the mechanism of action of STAD-2 peptides within iRBC were inconclusive, it is interesting to consider the observed lytic activity of STAD-2 within iRBC. This activity may have important implications regarding STAD-2 function in P. falciparum. Previous studies have demonstrated a role for PfPKA in regulation of parasite permeability such that overexpression of PfPKA-R led to inhibition of anionic channel conductance [35]. In addition, characterization of PfPKA-C from iRBC found highest activity of PfPKA-C in schizont-infected cells, consistent with our observed STAD-2 activity in late-stage parasites [58]. Therefore, although we found no definitive association of STAD-2 with PKA-R, it is possible that STAD-2-induced iRBC lysis results from altered activity of PKA. Alternatively, our IP/MS experiments showed association of STAD-2 with cytoadherence linked asexual protein 3.1, or CLAG3, in the parasite supernatant (S2 Table). Recent studies have shown CLAG3 to be associated with the PSAC such that CLAG3 alters erythrocyte permeability [59,60], raising the possibility that STAD-2 may interfere with CLAG3 function and/or PSAC activity, thereby leading to iRBC lysis.

Conclusions

Parasite drug resistance poses a serious threat to ongoing malaria control and elimination efforts. Development of new antimalarials targeting essential parasite components, such as kinases, or utilizing novel mechanisms of action may prevent devastating losses in our advancement toward malaria elimination. Here, we provide important groundwork for the use of stapled peptides as a novel class of antimalarials. Our data demonstrate the stapled AKAP disruptor, STAD-2, to be selectively permeable to iRBC. Furthermore, iRBC uptake of STAD-2 is highly specific and not reliant on known parasite permeability pathways. Notably, iRBC lysis triggered by STAD-2 appears to occur through a yet unknown, PKA-independent mechanism. Future research will explore the efficacy of stapled peptides designed to specifically inhibit protein-protein interactions unique to kinase targets in P. falciparum. We believe that the high specificity and unique mechanism of action of stapled peptides may yield promising new antimalarials with reduced vulnerability to parasite drug resistance.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. STAD-2 is permeable to P. falciparum strains in vitro.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 2 hours, stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342, and analyzed for STAD-2 uptake by flow cytometry. CS2, Dd2, 3D7, and Hb3 parasite strains demonstrate comparable levels of permeability to STAD-2 peptides (n = 2).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. STAD-2 permeability increases with time.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 1, 2, 3, or 6 hours and subsequently stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 before analysis by flow cytometry. Near-maximum levels of STAD-2 uptake are evident by 3 hours post-treatment (n = 3, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S3 Fig. STAD-2 reduces viability of P. falciparum strains in vitro.

Late-stage CS2, 3D7, Dd2, and Hb3 parasite strains were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2, and parasitemia was determined by flow cytometry at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-treatment. STAD-2 demonstrated variable antimalarial activity between strains and reduced viability in CS2, Dd2, and Hb3 strains (n = 3, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. STAD-2 reduces parasitemia 6 hours post-treatment.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 6 hours, stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Reduction in parasitemia was evident as early as 6 hour post-treatment (n = 7, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S5 Fig. H89 Dose-Response Curve.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with serial dilutions (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.24, 3.13, 1.56, 0.78, and 0 μM) of the small molecule PKA inhibitor, H89, for 24 hours and stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for parasitemia analysis by flow cytometry. H89 in vitro IC50 ≈ 30 μM in late-stage CS2 parasites (n = 2, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S1 Table. Top hits from Host Supernatant.

Identified STAD-2 interactors from host supernatant following IP and LC-MS/MS. Interactors are ranked based upon their Mascot ions score.

(TIF)

S2 Table. Top hits from Parasite Supernatant.

Identified STAD-2 interactors from parasite supernatant following IP and LC-MS/MS. Interactors are ranked based upon their Mascot ions score.

(TIF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

NIH 1K22CA154600 for EJK, NIH 2T32AI060546-06 for DSP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO. World Malaria Report 2014. 2014; 10.1007/s00108-013-3390-9 [DOI]
  • 2. Shretta R, Yadav P. Stabilizing supply of artemisinin and artemisinin-based combination therapy in an era of wide-spread scale-up. Malar J. Malaria Journal; 2012;11: 399 10.1186/1475-2875-11-399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, et al. Spread of Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371: 411–423. 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dondrop AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: 455–467. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dondorp AM, Yeung S, White L, Nguon C, Day NPJ, Socheat D, et al. Artemisinin resistance: current status and scenarios for containment. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8: 272–80. 10.1038/nrmicro2331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Harikishore A, Niang M, Rajan S, Preiser PR, Yoon HS. Small molecule Plasmodium FKBP35 inhibitor as a potential antimalaria agent. Sci Rep. 2013;3: 2501 10.1038/srep02501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. White NJ, Pukrittayakamee S, Phyo AP, Rueangweerayut R, Nosten F, Jittamala P, et al. Spiroindolone KAE609 for falciparum and vivax malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371: 403–10. 10.1056/NEJMoa1315860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bowman JD, Merino EF, Brooks CF, Striepen B, Carlier PR, Cassera MB. Antiapicoplast and gametocytocidal screening to identify the mechanisms of action of compounds within the malaria box. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58: 811–9. 10.1128/AAC.01500-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Srinivasan P, Yasgar A, Luci DK, Beatty WL, Hu X, Andersen J, et al. Disrupting malaria parasite AMA1-RON2 interaction with a small molecule prevents erythrocyte invasion. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2013;4: 2261 10.1038/ncomms3261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yeung BKS, Zou B, Rottmann M, Lakshminarayana SB, Ang SH, Leong SY, et al. Spirotetrahydro beta-carbolines (spiroindolones): a new class of potent and orally efficacious compounds for the treatment of malaria. J Med Chem. 2010;53: 5155–64. 10.1021/jm100410f [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Petersen I, Eastman R, Lanzer M. Drug-resistant malaria: molecular mechanisms and implications for public health. FEBS Lett. Federation of European Biochemical Societies; 2011;585: 1551–62. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Delfino RT, Santos-Filho OA, Figueroa-Villar JD. Molecular modeling of wild-type and antifolate resistant mutant Plasmodium falciparum DHFR. Biophys Chem. 2002;98: 287–300. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mharakurwa S, Kumwenda T, Mkulama MAP, Musapa M, Chishimba S, Shiff CJ, et al. Malaria antifolate resistance with contrasting Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) polymorphisms in humans and Anopheles mosquitoes. PNAS. 2011;108: 18796–18801. 10.1073/pnas.1116162108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Akhoon B a Singh KP, Varshney M Gupta SK, Shukla Y Gupta SK. Understanding the mechanism of atovaquone drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum cytochrome b mutation Y268S using computational methods. PLoS One. 2014;9: e110041 10.1371/journal.pone.0110041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fisher N, Abd Majid R, Antoine T, Al-Helal M, Warman AJ, Johnson DJ, et al. Cytochrome b mutation Y268S conferring atovaquone resistance phenotype in malaria parasite results in reduced parasite bc1 catalytic turnover and protein expression. J Biol Chem. 2012;287: 9731–41. 10.1074/jbc.M111.324319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schwöbel B, Alifrangis M, Salanti A, Jelinek T. Different mutation patterns of atovaquone resistance to Plasmodium falciparum in vitro and in vivo : rapid detection of codon 268 polymorphisms in the cytochrome b as potential in vivo. Malar J. 2003;2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chinappi M, Via A, Marcatili P, Tramontano A. On the mechanism of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One. 2010;5: e14064 10.1371/journal.pone.0014064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ferreira PE, Holmgren G, Veiga MI, Uhlén P, Kaneko A, Gil JP. PfMDR1: mechanisms of transport modulation by functional polymorphisms. PLoS One. 2011;6: e23875 10.1371/journal.pone.0023875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois A-C, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505: 50–5. 10.1038/nature12876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ghorbal M, Gorman M, Macpherson CR, Martins RM, Scherf A, Lopez-Rubio J-J. Genome editing in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32 10.1038/nbt.2925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Winzeler E a Manary MJ. Drug resistance genomics of the antimalarial drug artemisinin. Genome Biol. 2014;15: 544 10.1186/s13059-014-0544-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Walensky LD, Bird GH. Hydrocarbon-stapled peptides: principles, practice, and progress. J Med Chem. 2014;57: 6275–88. 10.1021/jm4011675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Verdine GL, Hilinski GJ. All-hydrocarbon stapled peptides as Synthetic Cell-Accessible Mini-Proteins. Drug Discov Today Technol. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;9: e41–e47. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Verdine GL, Walensky LD. The challenge of drugging undruggable targets in cancer: lessons learned from targeting BCL-2 family members. Clin cancer Res. 2007;13: 7264–70. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Walensky LD, Kung AL, Escher I, Malia TJ, Barbuto S, Wright RD, et al. Activation of apoptosis in vivo by a hydrocarbon-stapled BH3 helix. Science (80-). 2004;305: 1466–70. 10.1126/science.1099191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nomura W, Aikawa H, Ohashi N, Urano E, Métifiot M, Fujino M, et al. Cell-permeable stapled peptides based on HIV-1 integrase inhibitors derived from HIV-1 gene products. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8: 2235–44. 10.1021/cb400495h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cui H- K, Qing J, Guo Y, Wang Y-J, Cui L-J, He T-H, et al. Stapled peptide-based membrane fusion inhibitors of hepatitis C virus. Bioorg Med Chem. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;21: 3547–54. 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chapuis H, Slaninová J, Bednárová L, Monincová L, Buděšínský M, Čeřovský V. Effect of hydrocarbon stapling on the properties of α-helical antimicrobial peptides isolated from the venom of hymenoptera. Amino Acids. 2012;43: 2047–58. 10.1007/s00726-012-1283-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wang Y, Ho TG, Bertinetti D, Neddermann M, Franz E, Mo GCH, et al. Isoform-Selective Disruption of AKAP-Localized PKA Using Hydrocarbon Stapled Peptides. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9: 635–642. 10.1021/cb500329z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wong W, Scott JD. AKAP signalling complexes: focal points in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5: 959–70. 10.1038/nrm1527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Edwards AS, Scott JD. A-kinase anchoring proteins: protein kinase A and beyond. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12: 217–221. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10712918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Langeberg LK, Scott JD. A-kinase-anchoring proteins. J Cell Sci. 2005;118: 3217–20. 10.1242/jcs.02416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Scott JD, Dessauer CW, Taskén K. Creating order from chaos: cellular regulation by kinase anchoring. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;53: 187–210. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Haste NM, Talabani H, Doo A, Merckx A, Langsley G, Taylor SS. Exploring the Plasmodium falciparum cyclic-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase (PfPKA) as a therapeutic target. Microbes Infect. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2012;14: 838–50. 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Merckx A, Nivez M-P, Bouyer G, Alano P, Langsley G, Deitsch K, et al. Plasmodium falciparum regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent PKA and anion channel conductance. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4: e19 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ramdani G, Langsley G. ATP, an extracellular signaling molecule in red blood cells: a messenger for malaria? Biomed J. 2014;37: 284–292. 10.4103/2319-4170.132910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Maciaszek JL, Andemariam B, Abiraman K, Lykotrafitis G. AKAP-dependent modulation of BCAM/Lu adhesion on normal and sickle cell disease RBCs revealed by force nanoscopy. Biophys J. Biophysical Society; 2014;106: 1258–67. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wurtz N, Chapus C, Desplans J, Parzy D. cAMP-dependent protein kinase from Plasmodium falciparum: an update. Parasitology. 2011;138: 1–25. 10.1017/S003118201000096X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Merckx A, Bouyer G, Thomas SLY, Langsley G, Egée S. Anion channels in Plasmodium-falciparum-infected erythrocytes and protein kinase A. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25: 139–144. 10.1016/j.pt.2008.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Doerig C. Protein kinases as targets for anti-parasitic chemotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1697: 155–68. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kinderman FS, Kim C, von Daake S, Ma Y, Pham BQ, Spraggon G, et al. A dynamic mechanism for AKAP binding to RII isoforms of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Mol Cell. 2006;24: 397–408. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.09.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Desai S. Why do malaria parasites increase host erythrocyte permeability? Trends Parasitol. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;30: 151–9. 10.1016/j.pt.2014.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Okutsu R, Rai T, Kikuchi A, Ohno M, Uchida K, Sasaki S, et al. AKAP220 colocalizes with AQP2 in the inner medullary collecting ducts. Kidney Int. 2008;74: 1429–33. 10.1038/ki.2008.402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gold MG, Reichow SL, O’Neill SE, Weisbrod CR, Langeberg LK, Bruce JE, et al. AKAP2 anchors PKA with aquaporin-0 to support ocular lens transparency. EMBO Mol Med. 2011;4: 15–26. 10.1002/emmm.201100184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Roudier N, Verbavatz J, Maurel C, Ripoche P, Frederique T. Evidence for the Presence of Aquaporin-3 in Human Red Blood Cells*. J Biol Chem. 1998;273: 8407–8412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Liu Y, Promeneur D, Rojek A, Kumar N, Frøkiær J, Nielsen S, et al. Aquaporin 9 is the major pathway for glycerol uptake by mouse erythrocytes, with implications for malarial virulence. PNAS. 2007;104: 12560–12564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Pavlovic-Djuranovic S, Schultz JE, Beitz E. A single aquaporin gene encodes a water/glycerol/urea facilitator in Toxoplasma gondii with similarity to plant tonoplast intrinsic proteins. FEBS Lett. 2003;555: 500–504. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01313-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Beitz E, Pavlovic-Djuranovic S, Yasui M, Agre P, Schultz JE. Molecular dissection of water and glycerol permeability of the aquaglyceroporin from Plasmodium falciparum by mutational analysis. PNAS. 2004;101: 1153–8. 10.1073/pnas.0307295101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Yang B, Kim JK, Verkman AS. Comparative efficacy of HgCl with candidate aquaporin-1 inhibitors DMSO, gold, TEA, and acetazolamide. FEBS Lett. 2006;580: 6679–6684. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.11.025.Comparative [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.WHO. Emergency response to artemisnin resistance in the Greater Mekong subregion. 2013.
  • 51.WHO. Update on artemisinin resistance—April 2012. 2012.
  • 52. Gamo F-J, Sanz LM, Vidal J, De Cozar C, Alvarez E, Lavandera J-L, et al. Thousands of chemical starting points for antimalarial lead identification. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2010;465: 305–310. 10.1038/nature09107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Lucet IS, Tobin A, Drewry D, Wilks AF, Doerig C. Plasmodium kinases as targets for new-generation antimalarials. Future Med Chem. 2012;4: 2295–310. 10.4155/fmc.12.183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kolevzon N, Nasereddin A, Naik S, Yavin E, Dzikowski R. Use of peptide nucleic acids to manipulate gene expression in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One. 2014;9: e86802 10.1371/journal.pone.0086802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Copolovici DM, Langel K, Eriste E, Langel Ü. Cell-penetrating peptides: Design, synthesis, and applications. ACS Nano. 2014;8: 1972–1994. 10.1021/nn4057269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Sparr C, Purkayastha N, Kolesinska B, Gengenbacher M, Amulic B, Matuschewski K, et al. Improved efficacy of fosmidomycin against plasmodium and mycobacterium species by combination with the cell-penetrating peptide octaarginine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57: 4689–4698. 10.1128/AAC.00427-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kamena F, Monnanda B, Makou D. On the mechanism of eukaryotic cell penetration by α- and β-oligoarginines—targeting infected erythrocytes. Chem Biodivers. 2011;8: 1–12. 10.1002/cbdv.201000318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Li J, Cox LS. Isolation and characterisation of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit gene from Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;109: 157–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Nguitragool W, Bokhari AAB, Pillai AD, Rayavara K, Sharma P, Turpin B, et al. Malaria parasite clag3 genes determine channel-mediated nutrient uptake by infected red blood cells. Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;145: 665–77. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Nguitragool W, Rayavara K, Desai SA. Proteolysis at a specific extracellular residue implicates integral membrane CLAG3 in malaria parasite nutrient channels. PLoS One. 2014;9: e93759 10.1371/journal.pone.0093759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. STAD-2 is permeable to P. falciparum strains in vitro.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 2 hours, stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342, and analyzed for STAD-2 uptake by flow cytometry. CS2, Dd2, 3D7, and Hb3 parasite strains demonstrate comparable levels of permeability to STAD-2 peptides (n = 2).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. STAD-2 permeability increases with time.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 1, 2, 3, or 6 hours and subsequently stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 before analysis by flow cytometry. Near-maximum levels of STAD-2 uptake are evident by 3 hours post-treatment (n = 3, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S3 Fig. STAD-2 reduces viability of P. falciparum strains in vitro.

Late-stage CS2, 3D7, Dd2, and Hb3 parasite strains were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2, and parasitemia was determined by flow cytometry at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-treatment. STAD-2 demonstrated variable antimalarial activity between strains and reduced viability in CS2, Dd2, and Hb3 strains (n = 3, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. STAD-2 reduces parasitemia 6 hours post-treatment.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with 1 μM FITC-conjugated STAD-2 for 6 hours, stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Reduction in parasitemia was evident as early as 6 hour post-treatment (n = 7, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S5 Fig. H89 Dose-Response Curve.

Late-stage iRBC were treated with serial dilutions (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.24, 3.13, 1.56, 0.78, and 0 μM) of the small molecule PKA inhibitor, H89, for 24 hours and stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for parasitemia analysis by flow cytometry. H89 in vitro IC50 ≈ 30 μM in late-stage CS2 parasites (n = 2, mean ± S.E.).

(TIF)

S1 Table. Top hits from Host Supernatant.

Identified STAD-2 interactors from host supernatant following IP and LC-MS/MS. Interactors are ranked based upon their Mascot ions score.

(TIF)

S2 Table. Top hits from Parasite Supernatant.

Identified STAD-2 interactors from parasite supernatant following IP and LC-MS/MS. Interactors are ranked based upon their Mascot ions score.

(TIF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES