Skip to main content
NCBI home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Feb 7;410:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.01.045

Impact of Targeted PPARγ Disruption on Bone Remodeling

Jay Cao 1, Guomin Ou 2,#, Nianlan Yang 2, Kehong Ding 2, Barbara E Kream 3, Mark W Hamrick 4, Carlos M Isales 2,5, Xing-Ming Shi 2,5,*
PMCID: PMC4444378  NIHMSID: NIHMS662044  PMID: 25666993

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), known as the master regulator of adipogenesis, has been regarded as a promising target for new anti-osteoporosis therapy due to its role in regulating bone marrow mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell (BMSC) lineage commitment. However, the precise mechanism underlying PPARγ regulation of bone is not clear as a bone-specific PPARγ conditional knockout (cKO) study has not been conducted and evidence showed that deletion of PPARγ in other tissues also have profound effect on bone. In this study, we show that mice deficiency of PPARγ in cells expressing a 3.6kb type I collagen promoter fragment (PPARfl/fl:Col3.6-Cre) exhibit a moderate, site-dependent bone mass phenotype. In vitro studies showed that adipogenesis is abolished completely and osteoblastogenesis increased significantly in both primary bone marrow culture and the BMSCs isolated from PPARγ cKO mice. Histology and histomorphometry studies revealed significant increases in the numbers of osteoblasts and surface in the PPARγ cKO mice. Finally, we found that neither the differentiation nor the function of osteoclasts was affected in the PPARγ cKO mice. Together, our studies indicate that PPARγ plays an important role in bone remodeling by increasing the abundance of osteoblasts for repair, but not during skeletal development.

Keywords: PPARγ, MSC, aging, osteoblasts, bone loss

1. Introduction

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a ligand-activated nuclear receptor and is indispensible for adipocyte differentiation both in vitro and in vivo (1, 2). Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) is a common precursor for bone-forming osteoblasts and marrow adipocytes. With advancing age, bone mass decreases and marrow fat increases (fatty marrow) (3-5), indicating that an imbalance develops between these two pathways (6-8). Many factors including the diet can influence the balance between these two pathways resulting in high marrow fat content and low bone density (9). Since the PPARγ is a key adipogenic regulator and the osteoblast and adipocyte, which are the two dominant pathways for BMSC to differentiate, have a reciprocal relationship (10-12), the PPARγ has been viewed as a prominent target for new anti-osteoporosis therapies that could increase bone formation or prevent bone loss. Indeed, studies have shown that PPARγ heterozygous (PPARγ+/-) mice exhibited an extraordinary high bone mass phenotype (13). However, global PPARγ insufficiency reduced body fat mass, therefore it is not clear whether the high bone mass observed in these PPARγ insufficient mice was due to a direct effect of PPARγ on BMSC lineage determination or an indirect effect via modulating the functions of adipose tissue or both, since disruption of PPARγ in adipose tissue (lipodystrophic PPARγhyp/hyp mice) also enhanced osteoblastic activity and increased bone formation (14). In this study, we generated mice in which PPARγ gene is deleted in cells that support the activity of a 3.6kb type I collagen promoter fragment (PPARγfl/fl:Col3.6Cre) and report here the bone phenotype of these PPARγ conditional knockout (PPARγ cKO) mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

PPARγ cKO mice were created by breeding Col3.6-Cre transgenic mice (15) with PPARγ floxed (PPARγfl/fl) mice (16) using standard breeding procedures.

2.2. Ethics Statement

Animals were maintained in a centralized barrier facility and all experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Georgia Regents University.

2.3. Genotyping

Genotype was analyzed using primers and PCR conditions described previously (15, 17). In brief, tail genomic DNA was extracted and amplified with one forward primer (F1: 5′-CTCCAATGTTCTCAAACTTAC-3′) and two reverse primers (R1: 5′-GATGAGTCATGTAA GTTGACC-3′; R2: 5′-GTATTCTATGGCTTCCAGTGC-3′). The expected sizes of the PCR products are wild-type allele ∼250bp, floxed allele ∼285bp, and null allele ∼450bp. PCR analysis of Cre was performed using primers 5′-GCATTTCTGGGGATTGCTTA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTCATCCTTAGCGCCGTAAA-3′ (reverse). The expected size of PCR product for Cre is ∼350 bp.

2.4. DXA and Micro Computed Tomography (μCT) analysis

Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured at 6, 12, and 30 weeks of age by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (GE Lunar PIXImus system, software version 1.4×) as previously described (18). In brief, mice were anesthetized with a cocktail of ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine (30 mg/ml and 4 mg/ml, respectively, 0.1 ml/25 g body weight, IP) and were placed on the blocks supplied with the instrument according to the manufacturer's recommendations. All mice were analyzed at three distinct regions: (1) the total region, the whole body excluding the head; (2) a femoral region of interest that was defined as the maximal box fitted within a portion of the right femur; (3) a lumbar region of interest that was defined as the biggest box fitted within a portion of the lumbar vertebrae. The stability of the measurement was controlled by performing a quality control procedure before acquiring images. μCT scan (μCT-40; Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) was used to evaluate the bone structural parameters as previously described (18).

2.5. Histology and histomorphometry assays

Bone tissues were collected, processed, and analyzed following our procedures described previously (19, 20). Standard bone histomorphometrical nomenclatures, symbols, and units were used as recommended by Parfitt et al (21).

2.6. Primary bone marrow cell culture, isolation and differentiation of BMSCs

Bone marrow cells were flushed from long bones of PPARγ cKO, heterozygous, and PPARγfl/fl mice. Colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, BMSC isolation and differentiation were performed as previously described (22, 23).

2.7. In vitro osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption assay

Bone marrow monocyte and macrophage precursor cells (BMMs) were harvested from long bones and induced for osteoclast differentiation as described (18). In brief, BMMs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well in triplicates and cultured in α-MEM containing FBS (10%), M-CSF (50 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) (R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) for 5-6 days. Differentiated cells were fixed, stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (#387A-1KT, Sigma Aldrich). For Pit assay, BMMs were seeded in coated quartz slides (Osteologic bonecell culture system, BD Biosciences) and induced for osteoclast differentiation as above. The slides were then stained with 5% silver nitrate solution (von Kossa staining) and the bone resorption was visualized as white spots (pits) on the slides.

2.8. Western blot analysis

Western blot analyses were performed as previously described (22, 24). Protein levels of PPARγ were detected using a monoclonal antibody raised against a sequence mapping at the C-terminus of PPARγ (Cat #: sc-7273, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).

2.9. Immunofluoresence labeling and Imaging

This experiment was performed as previously described (25) except that a PPARγ2 monoclonal antibody was used. Images were acquired using a Nikon TE2000 fluorescence microscope equipped with COOLSNAP Monochrome Camera and processed with Metamorph Imaging System.

2.10. Real-time qRT-PCR analysis

BMSC culture, RNA isolation, and quantitative analysis of levels of mRNA expression were performed as described previously using TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents (Applied Biosystems) and a Chromo-4 real-time RT-PCR instrument (MJ Research) (23). The mRNA levels were normalized to β-actin (internal control) and gene expression was presented as fold changes (ΔΔ Ct method). The primer sequences used in the PCR reactions are: Runx2: 5′-CCACCACTCACTACCACACG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCAGCGTCAACACCATCATT-3′ (reverse); Colla1: 5′-CACCCTCAAGAGCCTGAGTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGGGCTGATGTACCAGTTCT-3′ (reverse); ALP: 5′-AACCCAGACACAAGCATTCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCAGCAAGAAGAAGCCTTTG-3′ (reverse); Ocn: 5′-TTCTGCTCACTCTGCTGACC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TTTGTAGGCGGTCTTCAAGC-3′ (reverse); PPARγ2: 5′-TTTTCCGAAGAACCATCCGAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACAAATGGTGATTTGTCCGTT-3′ (reverse); β-actin: 5′-CTGGCACCACACCTTCTACA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGTACGACCAGAGGCATACA-3′ (reverse).

2.11. Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SD. All in vitro experiments (qRT-PCR, cell differentiation etc.,) were performed in triplicates except where noted. Data were analyzed using either ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test or unpaired t-test, using a commercial statistical package (Instat, Graphad Inc.). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Bone phenotype of PPARγ cKO mice

Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC)

DXA scan was performed to detect dynamic changes of BMD and BMC. The measurement was started with mice at 6 weeks of age. This time point was based on studies by Akune et al (13), which showed that PPARγ haploinsufficient (PPARγ+/-) mice exhibit high bone mass at 8 weeks of age. We predicted that the PPARγfl/fl:Col3.6-Cre mice would have a greater bone mass increase at an earlier time point than the PPARγ+/- mice. However, we found no difference in BMD and BMC between cKO and floxed littermate control mice at 6 weeks of age either at the whole body or at the regional levels (data not shown). At 3 months of age, a moderate, yet statistically significant, increase in BMD and BMC (7.9% and 7.7%, respectively, cKO vs. flox) was detected in the lumbar spine of the male cKO mice. The magnitude of increase became more evident at 7.5 months (BMD 12%, BMC 10%, cKO vs. flox) (Table 1).

Table 1. BMD and BMC of male PPARγ cKO and fl/fl mice at 3 and 7.5 months of age.
Age 3 month 7.5 month
Genotype cKO (n=12) fl/fl (n=8) p cKO (n=13) fl/fl (n=13) p
Whole body
BMD (g/cm2) 0.0536±0.0021 0.0526±0.0014 0.2820 0.0593±0.0031 0.0556±0.0021 0.0017
BMC (g) 0.534±0.047 0.526±0.038 0.6749 0.639±0.063 0.574±0.045 0.0053
Spine
BMD (g/cm2) 0.0618±0.0031 0.0573±0.0035 0.0067 0.0664±0.0054 0.0594±0.0052 0.0026
BMC (g) 0.042±0.002 0.039±0.003 0.0423 0.044±0.005 0.040±0.006 0.0407
Femur
BMD (g/cm2) 0.0772±0.0060 0.0775±0.0023 0.9019 0.0855±0.0077 0.0809±0.0053 0.0880
BMC (g) 0.034±0.003 0.033±0.002 0.7735 0.038±0.005 0.036±0.003 0.1053
Open in a new tab

μCT analysis of lumbar spine (L4, 6.5 months of age) showed that the bone volume density (BV/TV) and trabecular number (Tb. N) were increased (56% and 15%, respectively; p <0.05, n=5) and trabecular separation (Tb. Sp) decreased (-12%, p <0.05, n=5) significantly in PPARγ cKO mice compared to that in PPARγfl/fl control mice (Fig. 1A-C). The trabecular thickness (Tb. Th) showed an increase in cKO mice (+15%, p=0.270, n=5), although this increase is not statistically significant (Fig. 1D). Representative re-constructed 3D images are shown in Fig. 1E.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A-D) μCT analysis of lumbar spine (L4) showing BV/TV, Tb. N, Tb. Sp and Tb. Th of 6.5-month-old male PPARγ cKO (solid bar) and double-floxed control (empty bar) mice. (E) Representative three-dimensional reconstructed images of L4 lumbar spine. Values are given as mean ± SD.

Histology and histomorphometric analyses of lumbar spine (L2, 6.5 months of age) showed that both the number and the surface of osteoblasts were increased significantly in the PPARγ cKO mice compared to that in floxed control mice (+98% and +72%, respectively) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Histology and histomorphometry analyses.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A, B) Representative H&E stained lumbar vertebrae (L4) from 6.5-month-old male mice. (C, D) Enlarged images showing the boxed areas in A and B. (E, F) Quantitative results showing the numbers of osteoblasts and the osteoblast covered bone surfaces.

3.2. PPARγ gene is ablated successfully in BMSCs

Since an expected high bone mass phenotype was not observed in the PPARγ cKO mice, we suspected that the Col3.6kb promoter fragment was probably not active in BMSCs but only in a small fraction of committed osteoblasts. To clarify this conjecture, we isolated BMSCs using a negative-immuno-depletion and positive-immuno-selection procedure established in our laboratory (23) and examined the expression of PPARγ mRNA. RT-PCR analysis showed that the PPARγ mRNA is, indeed, absent in the BMSCs of cKO mice while its expression detected in cells of PPARγ-flox and heterozygous mice (Fig. 3A). The Cre mRNA, which is present in cells of heterozygous and cKO mice, is absent in cells of double floxed mice. These results are consistent with the genotyping results obtained from PCR amplification of the tail genomic DNA (Fig. 3B). To confirm the deletion of PPARγ at the protein level, we performed Western blot and immunocytochemistry studies using a monoclonal antibody specific to PPARγ. Results of both experiments revealed, again, that the PPARγ protein is absent in cells isolated from cKO mice, but expressed in cells of heterozygous and PPARγ-flox mice (Fig. 3C, D). These results demonstrated that the Col3.6kb promoter fragment is active, robustly drives Cre expression, and ablates PPARγ allele in BMSCs.

Figure 3. Characterization of BMSCs isolated from the PPARγ cKO mice.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) RT-PCR analysis showing the expression of PPARγ and Cre mRNA in BMSCs isolated from PPARγ cKO, heterozygous (Het), and Floxed (Flox) mice. (B) Genotyping results showing distinct PCR products amplified from tail genomic DNA. KO and floxed PPARγ alleles are indicated. WT: tail DNA from a wild-type mouse was used as template in PCR reaction to show the wild type allele. (C, D) Western blot (C) and immunofluorescence labeling (D) showing PPARγ protein expression in BMSCs.

3.3. Adipogenic differentiation is abolished in PPARγ cKO cell cultures in vitro

To demonstrate, at the functional level, that PPARγ gene is deleted in BMSCs, we subjected BMSCs to adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation program. Fig. 4 shows that while the PPARγ-flox BMSCs differentiated into adipocytes normally, as determined by Oil Red O staining of the intracellular lipid droplets, the PPARγ KO cells completely lost their ability for adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 4A). As expected, in vitro osteogenic differentiation of PPARγ KO BMSC is enhanced significantly as assessed by Alizarin red S (ARS) staining of the mineralized bone nodules (Fig. 4A). This result is replicated in colony forming unit (CFU) assays using freshly prepared whole bone marrow cells, i.e., CFU-adipocyte (CFU-ad) is completely abolished and CFU-osteoblast (CFU-ob) enhanced significantly in marrow cell cultures of PPARγ cKO mice (Fig. 4B). Quantitative results of these assays are shown in Fig. 4C and D. These results are in line with the RT-PCR and western blot and immunocytochemistry studies. Together, these data demonstrated that the PPARγ gene is deleted by Col3.6kb promoter-driven Cre in BMSCs or progenitor cells that are capable of differentiating into at least two cell lineages, the adipocytes and osteoblasts.

Figure 4. Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation assays.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) BMSCs were subjected to standard adipocyte or osteoblast differentiation program. Cells were either stained with Oil red O for detection of adipocytes 9 days after induction (A, left panel), or stained with Alizarin red S for detection of mineralized bone nodules 21 days after induction (A, right panel). (B) Assays for the number of colony forming units (CFUs). Equal numbers of bone marrow cells (5×106 cells/25cm2 flask) from cKO and double-floxed mice were cultured in adipogenic or osteogenic induction media and stained with Oil Red O at day 11 for CFU-ad or with Alizarin red S at day 21 for CFU-ob. Colonies (>50 cells in size) were counted visually. These experiments were repeated two times in triplicates. Only one representative flask is shown for each group. (C, D) Quantitative results of B.

3.4. Expression of osteoblast lineage-associated genes in PPARγ KO BMSCs

To determine if the observed increase in osteogenesis of PPARγ KO cells correlates with the expression pattern of osteoblast lineage genes, we performed real-time qRT-PCR analysis. BMSCs from PPARγ cKO and floxed mice were treated with osteogenic induction media and analyzed for the expression of mRNAs. Results showed that the mRNA levels of Runx2 (Fig. 5A), type I collagen (5B), alkaline phosphatase (5C), and osteocalcin (5D) were all increased significantly in PPARγ KO cells compared to that in PPARγ-floxed cells. Levels of PPARγ mRNA in these cells are also shown (5E). These results demonstrated that BMSCs lacking PPARγ do have an enhanced in vitro osteogenic differentiation capability.

Figure 5. Real-time qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression during BMSC osteogenic differentiation.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

BMSCs were cultured in osteogenic induction media and harvested at days 3, 7, and 14 for total RNA isolation. Equal amounts of RNA were reverse transcribed and the mRNA levels of the indicated genes were analyzed. Data were normalized to β-actin and expressed as fold changes. Levels of mRNA in double-floxed BMSCs at day 3 were arbitrarily set as 1. Experiments were repeated two times. PCR reactions were performed in triplicates. Error bars indicate SD. *p < 0.05.

3.5. KO of PPARγ in BMSCs does not affect osteoclast differentiation and function

Lastly, we examined osteoclastogenesis both in vivo, using decalcified tibia samples, and in vitro, using bone marrow monocyte/macrophage precursor cells (BMMs). TRAP stain experiment showed that neither the numbers of osteoclasts (N.Oc/B.Pm) nor the osteoclast surfaces (N.Oc/BS) were different between PPARγ cKO and floxed control mice (Fig. 6A). In vitro osteoclast induction experiment showed that BMMs from PPARγ cKO and floxed mice differentiated into multi-nucleated TRAP-positive osteoclasts equally well (Fig. 6B), demonstrating that the osteoclast differentiation is not affected. To determine whether these osteoclasts are functionally different, we performed a bone resorption assay. BMMs were seeded in coated quartz slides and induced for osteoclast differentiation. The slides were then fixed and stained with 5% silver nitrate solution (von Kossa staining) to assess the bone resorption activity. Again, the results showed that the osteoclasts differentiated from BMMs of cKO and floxed control mice had similar bone resorption activity (Fig. 6C). These results suggested that deletion of PPARγ in osteoblastic lineage cells or BMSCs does not have an effect on osteoclast differentiation or function. This conclusion is consistent to and supported, in some degree, by studies of Akune et al, which showed that the osteoclastogenesis is not affected in PPARγ-haploinsufficient mice (13).

Figure 6. Effect of PPARγ on osteoclast differentiation and function.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(A) TRAP stain of decalcified tibiae samples showing the TRAP-positive osteoclasts in PPARγ cKO and double-floxed control mice at 7 months of age. (B) BMMs isolated from PPARγ cKO and floxed mice were induced for osteoclast differentiation in the presence of M-CSF (50ng/ml) and RANKL (50ng/ml) for 6 days and stained for TRAP activity. (C) Pit assay showing bone resorption activity. BMMs were induced as above in quartz chamber slides and stained with 5% silver nitrate. White spots indicate the area where bone resorption occurred. Insets: representative high power images of osteoclasts and pits shown in A and B. Original magnification of the images including insets is indicated. These experiments were performed at least 3 times and with different concentrations of RANKL, same results were obtained.

4. Discussion

In this study we showed that deletion of PPARγ gene in 3.6kb type I collagen promoter-expressing cells (PPARfl/fl:Col3.6-Cre) resulted in a moderately enhanced bone mineral density preferentially in the vertebrae of the elder mice (Table 1). Multiple experiments, from DNA to protein expression showed clearly that the PPARγ gene is deleted in cells supporting the activities of Col3.6kb promoter fragment (Fig. 3). Giving the high expectations for the impact of PPARγ knockout may have on bone, and the fact that the adipogenesis of both primary bone marrow cells and the BMSCs isolated from the PPARγ cKO mice is abolished completely (Fig. 4), it is a little disappointing that the bone density increase was not dramatic in the PPARfl/fl:Col3.6-Cre mice. Interestingly, however, a similar bone phenotype was also observed in another conditional PPARγ knockout mouse model, the PPARγfl/fl:Sox2-Cre mouse (26). This mouse, which carries total deletion of PPARγ, showed an increased BMD only in vertebrae but not in long bones (26). This phenotype is similar to the leptin-deficient ob/ob mouse, which shows increased bone mass in the spine and decreased bone mass in the limb (19). More recently, Sun et al reported that osteoblast-specific PPARγ KO (at ∼3 weeks of age) using an inducible Osx promoter-driven Cre (PPARγfl/fl:Sp7-tTA,tetO-EGFP/Cre) increased the Tb. N and decreased Tb. Sp in 6-month-old mice, but had no effect on BMD of the femur (long bone) and the authors concluded that suppression of PPARγ increases osteogenesis through activation of mTOR signaling (27). These results clearly indicated that other mechanisms by which PPARγ regulates bone exist. A plausible one, as proposed by Gimble and colleagues (28) and Ferrari and colleagues (26), in addition to mTOR pathway, is that PPARγ regulates bone turnover/remodeling by both a direct effect on cell differentiation and an indirect effect on cell fate determination through adipocyte and adipokine secretion (26). Supporting this notion, studies of lipodystrophic PPARγhyp/hyp mouse, which lacks PPARγ only in adipose tissues, also showed increased osteogenic activity and enhanced bone formation (14). The adipose tissue is an endocrine organ and secretes large amounts of factors including adipokines and inflammatory cytokines that are known to regulate bone formation and metabolism (29-41). Currently, it is not clear, and controversial, whether PPARγ plays a role in osteoclast differentiation or function. Our studies showed that the osteoclast differentiation was not affected in PPARfl/fl:Col3.6-Cre cKO mice (Fig. 6). Studies by Akune et al showed that osteoclast differentiation and function are not affected in PPARγ-haploinsufficient mice (13). Interestingly, Wan et al showed that mice lacking PPARγ in osteoclast lineage cells (Tie2-Cre:PPARf/f) develop severe osteopetrosis, suggesting that PPARγ is a strong pro-osteoclast factor (42). In contrast, several lines of in vitro evidence showed that activation of PPARγ by its ligands inhibits osteoclast differentiation (43-50). However, it is not clear whether this ligand-mediated inhibition is PPARγ dependent or independent.

Bone is a dynamic enterprise; it is constantly destroyed by osteoclasts and rebuilt by osteoblasts in a process called bone remodeling. Bone remodeling occurs constantly throughout the developed skeleton and is a key process maintaining bone homeostasis. While the activity of resorption and formation may keep in balance when bone mass is at its peak level or shortly after, during the phase of plateau, this balance is broken in old human or animals with more bones destroyed than new bones formed, thus generates a deficit in each remodeling cycle due to the lack of osteoblasts for repair (34, 51). Bone loss with aging is accompanied by an increase in marrow fat content (3-5), and this coincide with the increase of PPARγ (52-54). Our data that knockout PPARγ in BMSC/progenitor cells increased the numbers of osteoblasts suggests that PPARγ may play an important role in aging-induced bone loss, i.e., as the bone marrow microenvironment deteriorates with advancing age, the levels of PPARγ expression and/or activity increase. These changes lead to an increased marrow adipogenesis and the production of inflammatory cytokines and adipokines, which impact negatively on the production of osteoblasts and consequently, the bone repair during bone remodeling.

Highlights.

  • A bone marrow mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell specific PPARγ conditional knockout mouse model was generated using a 3.6kb type I collagen promoter-driven Cre line.

  • The PPARγ cKO mice exhibited a moderate, site-dependent bone mass phenotype.

  • The In vitro adipogenesis was abolished completely in bone marrow cells of PPARγ cKO mice.

  • The differentiation and function of osteoclasts were not affected in t PPARγ cKO mice.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Frank J. Gonzalez, National Cancer Institute, NIH, for providing floxed PPARγ mouse. We thank Byung Lee for his involvement of this study. This work was supported by grants from The National Institute on Aging (AG046248 and AG036675) and The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK76045). Fund to J.C. was from the USDA Agricultural Research Service program “Food Factors to Prevent Obesity and Related Diseases”, Current Research Information System no. 5450-51000-048-00D.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Barak Y, Nelson MC, Ong ES, Jones YZ, Ruiz-Lozano P, Chien KR, Koder A, Evans RM. PPAR gamma is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol Cell. 1999;4:585–595. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80209-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosen ED, Sarraf P, Troy AE, Bradwin G, Moore K, Milstone DS, Spiegelman BM, Mortensen RM. PPAR gamma is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell. 1999;4:611–617. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80211-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Justesen J, Stenderup K, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L, Steiniche T, Kassem M. Adipocyte tissue volume in bone marrow is increased with aging and in patients with osteoporosis. Biogerontology. 2001;2:165–171. doi: 10.1023/a:1011513223894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Verma S, Rajaratnam JH, Denton J, Hoyland JA, Byers RJ. Adipocytic proportion of bone marrow is inversely related to bone formation in osteoporosis. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:693–698. doi: 10.1136/jcp.55.9.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meunier P, Aaron J, Edouard C, Vignon G. Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. A quantitative study of 84 iliac bone biopsies Clin Orthop. 1971;80:147–154. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197110000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahdjoudj S, Lasmoles F, Oyajobi BO, Lomri A, Delannoy P, Marie PJ. Reciprocal control of osteoblast/chondroblast and osteoblast/adipocyte differentiation of multipotential clonal human marrow stromal F/STRO-1(+) cells. J Cell Biochem. 2001;81:23–38. doi: 10.1002/1097-4644(20010401)81:1<23::aid-jcb1021>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beresford JN, Bennett JH, Devlin C, Leboy PS, Owen ME. Evidence for an inverse relationship between the differentiation of adipocytic and osteogenic cells in rat marrow stromal cell cultures. J Cell Sci. 1992;102(Pt 2):341–351. doi: 10.1242/jcs.102.2.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jaiswal RK, Jaiswal N, Bruder SP, Mbalaviele G, Marshak DR, Pittenger MF. Adult human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to the osteogenic or adipogenic lineage is regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:9645–9652. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Devlin MJ, Cloutier AM, Thomas NA, Panus DA, Lotinun S, Pinz I, Baron R, Rosen CJ, Bouxsein ML. Caloric restriction leads to high marrow adiposity and low bone mass in growing mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2010;25:2078–2088. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Minguell JJ, Erices A, Conget P. Mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2001;226:507–520. doi: 10.1177/153537020122600603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage Potential of Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Science. 1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997;276:71–74. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5309.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akune T, Ohba S, Kamekura S, Yamaguchi M, Chung UI, Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Harada Y, Azuma Y, Nakamura K, et al. PPARgamma insufficiency enhances osteogenesis through osteoblast formation from bone marrow progenitors. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:846–855. doi: 10.1172/JCI19900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cock TA, Houten SM, Auwerx J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma: too much of a good thing causes harm. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:142–147. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu F, Woitge HW, Braut A, Kronenberg MS, Lichtler AC, Mina M, Kream BE. Expression and activity of osteoblast-targeted Cre recombinase transgenes in murine skeletal tissues. Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48:645–653. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041816fl. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Akiyama TE, Sakai S, Lambert G, Nicol CJ, Matsusue K, Pimprale S, Lee YH, Ricote M, Glass CK, Brewer HB, Jr, et al. Conditional disruption of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene in mice results in lowered expression of ABCA1, ABCG1, and apoE in macrophages and reduced cholesterol efflux. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:2607–2619. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2607-2619.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang H, Zhang A, Kohan DE, Nelson RD, Gonzalez FJ, Yang T. Collecting duct-specific deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} blocks thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102:9406–9411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501744102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pan G, Cao J, Yang N, Ding K, Fan C, Xiong WC, Hamrick M, Isales CM, Shi XM. Role of Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper (GILZ) in Bone Acquisition. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.535237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hamrick MW, Della-Fera MA, Choi YH, Pennington C, Hartzell D, Baile CA. Leptin Treatment Induces Loss of Bone Marrow Adipocytes and Increases Bone Formation in Leptin-Deficient ob/ob Mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20:994–1001. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hamrick MW, Shi X, Zhang W, Pennington C, Thakore H, Haque M, Kang B, Isales CM, Fulzele S, Wenger KH. Loss of myostatin (GDF8) function increases osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells but the osteogenic effect is ablated with unloading. Bone. 2007;40:1544–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 1987;2:595–610. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang W, Yang N, Shi XM. Regulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation by Glucocorticoid-induced Leucine Zipper (GILZ) Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283:4723–4729. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704147200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang W, Ou G, Hamrick M, Hill W, Borke J, Wenger K, Chutkan N, Yu J, Mi QS, Isales CM, et al. Age-Related Changes in the Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Mouse Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2008;23:1118–1128. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.080304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shi X, Shi W, Li Q, Song B, Wan M, Bai S, Cao X. A glucocorticoid-induced leucine-zipper protein, GILZ, inhibits adipogenesis of mesenchymal cells. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:374–380. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang N, Zhang W, Shi XM. Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) mediates glucocorticoid action and inhibits inflammatory cytokine-induced COX-2 expression. J Cell Biochem. 2007;103:1760–1771. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.He F, Dominique P, Anne W, Serge F, Beatrice D. Bone Marrow Adiposity Affects Osteoclastogenesis by Modulating the Bone Marrow Niche. ASBMR Annual Meeting 2011 Annual Meeting. 2011:S63–S63. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun H, Kim JK, Mortensen R, Mutyaba LP, Hankenson KD, Krebsbach PH. Osteoblast-targeted suppression of PPARgamma increases osteogenesis through activation of mTOR signaling. Stem Cells. 2013;31:2183–2192. doi: 10.1002/stem.1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nuttall M, Shah F, Singh V, Thomas-Porch C, Frazier T, Gimble J. Adipocytes and the Regulation of Bone Remodeling: A Balancing Act. Calcified Tissue International. 2014;94:78–87. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9807-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trujillo ME, Scherer PE. Adipose Tissue-Derived Factors: Impact on Health and Disease. Endocrine Reviews. 2006;27:762–778. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abrahamsen BO, Bonnevie-Nielsen VAGN, Ebbesen EN, Gram JEPP, Beck-Nielsen HENN. Cytokines and Bone Loss in a 5-Year Longitudinal Study--Hormone Replacement Therapy Suppresses Serum Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor and Increases Interleukin-1-Receptor Antagonist: The Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15:1545–1554. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khosla S, Peterson JM, Egan K, Jones JD, Riggs BL. Circulating cytokine levels in osteoporotic and normal women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism. 1994;79:707–711. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.3.8077350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jilka RL, Hangoc G, Girasole G, Passeri G, Williams DC, Abrams JS, Boyce B, Broxmeyer H, Manolagas SC. Increased osteoclast development after estrogen loss: mediation by interleukin-6. Science. 1992;257:88–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1621100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nanes MS. Tumor necrosis factor-[alpha]: molecular and cellular mechanisms in skeletal pathology. Gene. 2003;321:1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00841-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Bone Marrow, Cytokines, and Bone Remodeling -- Emerging Insights into the Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1995;332:305–311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502023320506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ding C, Parameswaran V, Udayan R, Burgess J, Jones G. Circulating Levels of Inflammatory Markers Predict Change in Bone Mineral Density and Resorption in Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism. 2008;93:1952–1958. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maurin AC, Chavassieux PM, Frappart L, Delmas PD, Serre CM, Meunier PJ. Influence of mature adipocytes on osteoblast proliferation in human primary cocultures. Bone. 2000;26:485–489. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00252-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fried SK, Bunkin DA, Greenberg AS. Omental and subcutaneous adipose tissues of obese subjects release interleukin-6: depot difference and regulation by glucocorticoid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:847–850. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.3.4660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peng XD, Xie H, Zhao Q, Wu XP, Sun ZQ, Liao EY. Relationships between serum adiponectin, leptin, resistin, visfatin levels and bone mineral density, and bone biochemical markers in Chinese men. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2008;387:31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sayers A, Timpson NJ, Sattar N, Deanfield J, Hingorani AD, Davey-Smith G, Tobias JH. Adiponectin and its association with bone mass accrual in childhood. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2010;25:2212–2220. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Filková M, Haluzík M, Gay S, Senolt L. The role of resistin as a regulator of inflammation: Implications for various human pathologies. Clinical Immunology. 2009;133:157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Richards JB, Valdes AM, Burling K, Perks UC, Spector TD. Serum Adiponectin and Bone Mineral Density in Women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism. 2007;92:1517–1523. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wan Y, Chong LW, Evans RM. PPAR-gamma regulates osteoclastogenesis in mice. Nat Med. 2007;13:1496–1503. doi: 10.1038/nm1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mbalaviele G, Abu-Amer Y, Meng A, Jaiswal R, Beck S, Pittenger MF, Thiede MA, Marshak DR. Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-gamma Pathway Inhibits Osteoclast Differentiation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:14388–14393. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bendixen AC, Shevde NK, Dienger KM, Willson TM, Funk CD, Pike JW. IL-4 inhibits osteoclast formation through a direct action on osteoclast precursors via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:2443–2448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041493198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hounoki H, Sugiyama E, Mohamed SG, Shinoda K, Taki H, Abdel-Aziz HO, Maruyama M, Kobayashi M, Miyahara T. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma inhibits TNF-alpha-mediated osteoclast differentiation in human peripheral monocytes in part via suppression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression. Bone. 2008;42:765–774. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Abbas S, Zhang YH, Clohisy JC, Abu-Amer Y. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibits pre-osteoblast differentiation through its type-1 receptor. Cytokine. 2003;22:33–41. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4666(03)00106-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kaneki H, Guo R, Chen D, Yao Z, Schwarz EM, Zhang YE, Boyce BF, Xing L. Tumor Necrosis Factor Promotes Runx2 Degradation through Up-regulation of Smurf1 and Smurf2 in Osteoblasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:4326–4333. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509430200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yamazaki M, Fukushima H, Shin M, Katagiri T, Doi T, Takahashi T, Jimi E. Tumor necrosis factor alpha represses bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling by interfering with the DNA binding of Smads through the activation of NF-kappaB. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284:35987–35995. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.070540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bertolini DR, Nedwin GE, Bringman TS, Smith DD, Mundy GR. Stimulation of bone resorption and inhibition of bone formation in vitro by human tumour necrosis factors. Nature. 1986;319:516–518. doi: 10.1038/319516a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kobayashi K, Takahashi N, Jimi E, Udagawa N, Takami M, Kotake S, Nakagawa N, Kinosaki M, Yamaguchi K, Shima N, et al. Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Stimulates Osteoclast Differentiation by a Mechanism Independent of the ODF/RANKL-RANK Interaction. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2000;191:275–286. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Manolagas SC. Birth and Death of Bone Cells: Basic Regulatory Mechanisms and Implications for the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Endocrine Reviews. 2000;21:115–137. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.2.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jiang Y, Mishima H, Sakai S, Liu Yk, Ohyabu Y, Uemura T. Gene expression analysis of major lineage-defining factors in human bone marrow cells: Effect of aging, gender, and age-related disorders. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2008;26:910–917. doi: 10.1002/jor.20623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Almeida M, Ambrogini E, Han L, Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Increased Lipid Oxidation Causes Oxidative Stress, Increased Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-__ Expression, and Diminished Pro-osteogenic Wnt Signaling in the Skeleton. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284:27438–27448. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.023572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Imai T, Takakuwa R, Marchand S, Dentz E, Bornert JM, Messaddeq N, Wendling O, Mark M, Desvergne B, Wahli W, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is required in mature white and brown adipocytes for their survival in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4543–4547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400356101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES