Skip to main content
Translational Behavioral Medicine logoLink to Translational Behavioral Medicine
. 2015 Feb 24;5(2):131–133. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0309-0

News from CDC: applying a life course approach to primary cancer prevention

Meredith L Shoemaker 1,, Dawn M Holman 1, S Jane Henley 1, Mary C White 1
PMCID: PMC4444710  PMID: 26029275

Abstract

Keywords: Cancer, Primary prevention, Knowledge translation, Public health practice


Each year, over 1.5 million people in the USA are told that they have cancer [1], a major challenge for everyone facing a cancer diagnosis, as well as for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the nation’s prevention agency. Cancer is more easily prevented than cured [2], yet many avoidable risk factors remain prevalent. We now understand that cancer is actually many diseases, caused by different factors operating, sometimes synergistically, over many years. A transdisciplinary approach can be used to synthesize and disseminate the disparate knowledge needed to develop and implement effective cancer prevention programs [3, 4]. As we learn more about the multitude of individual, societal, and environmental factors that influence cancer development, we can build on this growing body of scientific knowledge to adopt and implement multifaceted approaches for cancer prevention [5]. CDC uses a comprehensive framework for chronic disease prevention that encompasses four cross-cutting strategies: epidemiology and surveillance, environmental approaches, health systems interventions, and community-clinical linkages [6]. While the activities of CDC’s Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC) historically have focused primarily on health system interventions related to cancer screening and surveillance through cancer registries, we are exploring new opportunities to apply all four strategies to primary cancer prevention.

The Cancer Prevention Across the Lifespan (CPAL) workgroup was organized within DCPC as a division-wide effort to foster innovative public health approaches to primary cancer prevention, adapted as appropriate for different stages of life (Fig. 1). Grounded in a socio-ecological framework [7], the workgroup reviews the scientific literature and engages scientific experts both within and outside CDC. It works to understand and disseminate information about ways to translate science into public health practice for cancer prevention. The workgroup uses several overarching questions to identify opportunities to reduce cancer risk and promote health at every age (Box 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

The CPAL workgroup’s lifespan approach

Box 1. The CPAL workgroup’s overarching questions

• How do risk and protective factors contribute to cancer development at different stages of life?
• Which of these risk and protective factors could be modified through policy, systems, or environmental changes or other social or public health interventions?
• Where is the evidence strongest to justify taking public health action and what role might public health agencies play?
• What additional data in the short-term could create tipping points for action?
• What specific public health activities have been demonstrated to be effective or show promise at the community level to address these factors?
• How do we best coordinate health promotion and disease prevention efforts to work toward broadly shared goals, such as improving quality of life, preventing premature death and reducing health care costs?
• What barriers might we face in trying to put scientific findings into public health policy and practice?
• How do we communicate certainty or uncertainty regarding cancer risk and prevention to the public, to policymakers and to the media?

In 2011, the CPAL workgroup held a transdisciplinary expert meeting on opportunities for cancer prevention during preadolescence and adolescence, a period of unique susceptibility [8]. Health behaviors associated with cancer risk, such as tobacco and alcohol use and indoor tanning, tend to emerge during this phase of life [9] and can influence cancer risk later in life [10]. This meeting highlighted several key topics relevant to cancer prevention in this age group. Examples included reducing exposure to radiation from medical imaging, harmful endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and pro-tobacco advertisements, avoiding indoor tanning, and promoting healthy, protective behaviors such as use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, physical activity, and healthy eating [11]. A special issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health included articles that elaborate further on strategies to prevent cancer, with a focus on youth, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1054139X/52/5/supp/S. In addition to the journal supplement, the workgroup conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature on barriers to HPV vaccine use. Although CDC recommends the HPV vaccine for preteen boys and girls aged 11 or 12 years to protect against HPV infection and prevent cervical cancer in women, too few boys and girls receive the HPV vaccine [12]. The review identified multiple points of intervention for increasing vaccine uptake [13].

In 2012, the CPAL workgroup held a transdisciplinary expert meeting on opportunities for cancer prevention during midlife, another critical period for cancer prevention [14]. During midlife, the effects of harmful exposures and health behaviors often start to appear along with the onset of chronic diseases or other health problems. While cancer risk generally increases with age, this relationship potentially could be modified by avoiding harmful exposures, preventing and managing chronic conditions, and modifying health behaviors at midlife [15]. Many evidence-based approaches exist to reduce cancer risk and support health during midlife and beyond, and factors such as diet, physical activity, sleep, environmental carcinogens, medical radiation, and alcohol are particularly important [16]. A supplemental issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine elaborates on cancer risk during midlife and strategies to take public health action [17], available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07493797/46/3/supp/S1. One risk factor highlighted at the expert meeting and in the supplemental issue was alcohol use. Alcohol use is an important risk factor to address within the context of cancer prevention given its high prevalence among US adults (56 % were current drinkers 2011) [18]. Unfortunately, it is often overlooked in US cancer control plans [18]. Also highlighted was the workplace, a promising setting for cancer prevention interventions due to its strong influence on health among adults at midlife. Numerous resources are available from CDC to help employers incorporate cancer prevention into workplace health promotion [19]. These resources emphasize workplace exposures, physical activity, and nutrition as well as organizational policies that influence cancer risk in the workplace.

Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US, and most cases are preventable by avoiding overexposure to the sun or indoor tanning. DCPC and members of the CPAL workgroup contributed to The Surgeon Generals Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer, which raises awareness about skin cancer prevention and calls on partners to take action against skin cancer risk [20]. This report, available at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/prevent-skin-cancer/index.html, summarizes recent data from CDC and others and presents strategic goals to support skin cancer prevention in the USA.

DCPC and the CPAL workgroup are developing a series of briefs for CDC’s Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) grantees on best policies and practices for cancer prevention [21]. DCPC has initiated this series with two briefs: one on reducing radon in homes and another on reducing indoor tanning among minors. Both are evidence-based guides to help states and CCC programs reduce harmful exposures and subsequent cancer risk.

DCPC will continue to promote partnership development, research translation, and dissemination of effective public health strategies to support cancer prevention across the lifespan. To maximize success, public health efforts need to be transdisciplinary and involve all four of the cross-cutting strategies for chronic disease prevention. As we consider the different stages of life, we look forward to new opportunities to put science into public health action for primary cancer prevention.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by an appointment (MLS) to the Research Participation Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the US Department of Energy and CDC. The members of the Cancer Prevention Across the Lifespan (CPAL) workgroup were instrumental in the activities described in this report. Workgroup members included Jennifer E. Boehm, Natasha Buchanan, Donatus Ekwueme, T’Ronda Flagg, Kristi Fultz-Butts, Gery Guy, Nikki Hawkins, Jane Henley, Dawn Holman, Chunyu Li, Jun Li, Greta M. Massetti, Mary Elizabeth O’Neil, Lucy Peipins, Mary Puckett, Juan Rodriguez, Meredith L. Shoemaker, Katrina F. Trivers, Meg Watson, Mary C. White, and Susan White. Additionally, we would like to thank Katherine B. Roland for her constructive contributions to this report.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

References

  • 1.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. 2014; http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.Accessed December 31, 2014.
  • 2.Frieden TR, Myers JE, Krauskopf MS, Farley TA. A public health approach to winning the war against cancer. Oncologist. 2008;13(12):1306–1313. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gehlert S. Turning disciplinary knowledge into solutions. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5, Supplement):S98–S102. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gehlert S. Forging an integrated agenda for primary cancer prevention during midlife. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3, Supplement 1):S104–S109. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White MC, Peipins LA, Watson M, Trivers KF, Holman DM, Rodriguez JL. Cancer prevention for the next generation. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5, Supplement):S1–S7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bauer UE, Briss PA, Goodman RA, Bowman BA. Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century: elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA. Lancet. 2014;384(9937):45–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60648-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Department of Health and Human Services. The secretary’s advisory committee on national health promotion and disease prevention objectives for 2020: recommendations for the framework and format of healthy people 2020. 2008; http://www.healthypeople.gov/sites/default/files/PhaseI_0.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2014.
  • 8.Biro FM, Deardorff J. Identifying opportunities for cancer prevention during preadolescence and adolescence: puberty as a window of susceptibility. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5, Supplement):S15–S20. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Santelli JS, Sivaramakrishnan K, Edelstein ZR, Fried LP. Adolescent risk-taking, cancer risk, and life course approaches to prevention. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5, Supplement):S41–S44. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of cancer prevention and control. Cancer prevention among youth. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/prevention/youth.htm. Accessed December, 17, 2014.
  • 11.Holman DM, Rodriguez JL, Peipins L, Watson M, White MC. Highlights from a workshop on opportunities for cancer prevention during preadolescence and adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5, Supplement):S8–S14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stokley S, Jeyarajah J, Yankey D, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage among adolescents, 2007-2013, and postlicensure vaccine safety monitoring, 2006-2014--United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Jul 25 2014; 63(29): 620-624. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6329a3.htm?s_cit = mm6329a3_w [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Holman DM, Benard V, Roland KB, Watson M, Liddon N, Stokley S. Barriers to human papillomavirus vaccination among US adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(1):76–82. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ory MG, Anderson LA, Friedman DB, Pulczinski JC, Eugene N, Satariano WA. Cancer prevention among adults aged 45–64 years: setting the stage. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3, Supplement 1):S1–S6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.White MC, Holman DM, Boehm JE, Peipins LA, Grossman M, Henley SJ. Age and cancer risk: a potentially modifiable relationship. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3, Supplement 1):S7–S15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Holman DM, Grossman M, Henley SJ, Peipins LA, Tison L, White MC. Opportunities for cancer prevention during midlife: highlights from a meeting of experts. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3, Supplement 1):S73–S80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of cancer prevention and control. Cancer prevention during midlife. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/prevention/midlife.htm. Accessed December 17, 2014.
  • 18.Henley SJ, Kanny D, Roland KB, et al. Alcohol control efforts in comprehensive cancer control plans and alcohol use among adults in the USA. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;49(6):661–667. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cancer Prevention in the Workplace Writing G Cancer prevention and worksite health promotion: time to join forces. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E128. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Surgeon General; 2014. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/prevent-skin-cancer/call-to-action-prevent-skin-cancer.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2014. [PubMed]
  • 21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. Policies and Practices for Cancer Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/prevention/policies_practices/index.htm. Accessed December 17, 2014.

Articles from Translational Behavioral Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES