Skip to main content
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology logoLink to Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology
. 2015 May;8(2):3–8.

Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of a Wide-Neck Aneurysm at the Vertebral Artery Terminus Using a Contralateral Approach: A Technical Report

Chinwe Ibeh 1, Qaisar A Shah 2
PMCID: PMC4445340  PMID: 26060520

Abstract

Background

Aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ) are especially uncommon but carry a significant risk of hemorrhage and historically have been difficult to treat. In recent years, however, advancements in stent-assisted embolization have allowed better access and stabilization of complicated posterior circulation aneurysms.

Methods

We describe a novel approach in the treatment of a wide-neck aneurysm at the terminus of the left vertebral artery by a contralateral approach in a patient with ipsilateral subclavian artery occlusion.

Results

A complex, wide-neck aneurysm at the verterbrobasilar junction hindered by ipsilateral subclavian occlusion can successfully be treated with stent-assisted coil embolization using a contralateral approach.

Conclusion

Contralateral U-shaped stenting offers a viable endovascular option for patients with complex aneurysms of the vertebral basilar junction but should be reserved for appropriate cases with favorable anatomy when the ipsilateral approach from the subclavian artery is unobtainable.

Keywords: vertebrobasilar aneurysms, stent-assisted coil embolization, wide-neck aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Posterior circulation aneurysms account for only 8–10% of all intracranial aneurysms but carry the highest risk of hemorrhage and operative complications [1, 2]. Aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ) are especially uncommon and can be extremely difficult to treat. Interventions for intracranial aneurysms include both surgical clipping and endovascular coiling [3]. The proximity of the VBJ to critical vascular and neural structures, however, makes microsurgical intervention less favorable [4]. Moreover, prospective data from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) suggest patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated endovascularly have better outcomes than those managed surgically [5]. Complicated cerebrovascular anatomy presents technical challenges that require more innovative thinking about treatment strategies. In turn, new endovascular approaches and techniques in the last five years have broadened the scope of treatable aneurysms. In particular, advancements in stent-assisted coil embolization have allowed better access and stabilization of complicated wide-neck aneurysms in the posterior circulation [6 ]. Here, we present a novel approach in the treatment of a complex, wide-necked aneurysm at the left vertebral artery (VA) terminus in a patient who could not undergo anterograde stent placement due to the presence of ipsilateral subclavian artery occlusion. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of an intracranial stent deployed from the contralateral VA to the ipsilateral in a U-shaped configuration for coil embolization.>

TECHNIQUE

A 91-year-old woman with a history of subclavian steal was transferred to our institution with a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and hydrocephalus. On arrival, the patient was alert and following some commands with an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 10. Within an hour, however, she became progressively obtunded. Following emergent external ventricular drain placement, cerebral angiogram was performed revealing a complex, bi-lobed aneurysm at the vertebrobasilar junction with the neck principally coming off the left vertebral artery. The aneurysm had a wide neck measuring 4.768 mm and a height of 3.34 mm. Lobe 1 had a width of 3.1 mm and lobe 2, 2.1 mm.

Angiography also demonstrated dense calcification and occlusion of the proximal left subclavian artery without flow into any distal branches or the vertebral artery; making an approach through the ipsilateral vertebral impossible.

After loading the patient with 81 mg of aspirin and 600 mg of clopidogrel, a 0.35″ glide wire was advanced into the right subclavian and vertebral artery. Guide catheter was positioned at the origin of right vertebral artery. A Prowler Select Plus microcatheter was then introduced into the vertebrobasilar junction. The microwire was directed from the right vertebral artery, around the junction, and into the left vertebral artery.

A 4.5 × 22 mm Enterprise stent was deployed from the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) to the right PICA. After follow-up, angiography confirmed patency and positioning of the stent, the first coil was placed. Immediately following coil #1, the patient became bradycardic, hypotensive, and ICP increased to the 70 s. Follow-up angiography revealed contrast extravasation. The EVD was immediately opened to drain off approximately 15–20 cc of CSF, while protamine and 23.4% hypertonic saline were administered and blood pressure (BP) pharmacologically lowered. Six more coils were deployed in rapid succession; a seventh could not be deployed after the microcatheter herniated out of the aneurysm. Follow-up angiography revealed good exclusion of the aneurysm without any further evidence of extravasation.

There was no evidence of thrombosis or distal artery cutoff. The catheter was removed, and the patient was transferred to the ICU, stable, and intubated. The patient was extubated the following day and by postoperative day 2 was doing well neurologically—alert, verbal without aphasia and was following commands.

DISCUSSION

Surgical access to an aneurysm at the vertebrobasilar junction is complicated by its proximity to several critical structures, including the brainstem, perforating arteries, and lower cranial nerves. In addition, any direct approach is limited by the petrous bone [4]. However, endovascular approaches to the VBJ are relatively straightforward, and recently, coil occlusion has become the treatment of choice [4]. The advantages of stent-assisted coiling over the use of coiling alone for wide-neck posterior circulation aneurysms has been well documented [1, 712]. Stenting can help prevent coil extrusion from the aneurysmal sac into the parent artery, facilitate thrombosis of the aneurysm through stasis, and provide a scaffold for endothelialization across the aneurysmal neck, thus preventing recanalization [13]. Recently, variations of the classic stent model have emerged to tackle some of the most technically challenging aneurysms of the posterior circulation. To manage wide-neck aneurysms at the basilar bifurcation, so-called “Y-stenting” techniques have been adopted that have reshaped our understanding of stent mechanics and peri-aneurysmal flow dynamics [6]. Y-stenting, which involves the passing of one stent through the interstices of another in a Y-configuration, may improve aneurysm occlusion rates through both cerebrovascular remodeling and flow diversion [14]. However, in comparison with most single-stenting techniques, the Y-stent generates more flow disturbance at the aneurysmal neck, may increase the risk of thromboembolic complications with the use of twice the amount of metal work, and results in less precise approximation with the aneurysmal neck [8].

Horizontal stenting has also been used for the management of complicated wide-neck aneurysms of the posterior circulation. Since horizontal stenting was first introduced for wide-necked basilar tip aneurysms, successful P1-P1, P1-SCA, and P1-PCom deployments have been described [9, 15, 16]. Such a technique allows placement of the stent directly perpendicular to the long axis of the aneurysm and parallel with the efferent vessels, facilitating tighter packing, and reinforcement of the coil mass. The use of a single stent also decreases thromboembolic risk and cost [8].

However, in comparison with the basilar bifurcation, the unique geometry of the vertebrobasilar junction poses additional problems and more limited options of approach. In this case, we felt that with the complexity of the VBJ lesion and its precarious location, endovascular coiling with stent stabilization was the most appropriate intervention. But in the presence of proximal occlusion of the subclavian artery and with the acute angles made by the vertebral arteries at the base of the basilar, a more careful selection of stent device was necessary. In our case, we used the Enterprise stent system. Along with the Prowler Select Plus microcatheter for delivery, the flexibility of this stent system allowed us to negotiate the rather sharp angles of the VBJ to bridge and maintain patency through both vertebral arteries.

However, U-shaped stent-assisted coil embolization is not without its limitations and careful consideration regarding the patient’s clinical picture and cerebrovascular anatomy must be taken into account. The stent serves as a permanent implant and requires subsequent administration of dual antiplatelet therapy, which can complicate the use of ventriculostomy in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Additionally, contralateral placement of a U-shaped stent is not applicable to every aneurysm encumbered by proximal occlusion. This approach would require sufficient diameter and a less convoluted course in the contralateral subclavian and vertebral vessels. A more acutely angled junction may also preclude this approach. In the case reported here, the right and left vertebral arteries inserted into the base of the basilar roughly 26° and 21° from the vertical axis, respectively. For successful U-shaped positioning from one vertebral artery to the other, a relatively more obtuse, U-shaped intersection of the two arteries as demonstrated here is ideal. Negotiating a more V-shaped angulation at the base of the basilar artery would prove challenging.

CONCLUSION

The technical challenges of treating complex, wide-neck aneurysms of the posterior circulation continue to inspire innovative endovascular approaches and techniques. In this technical report, we have demonstrated safe and successful application of U-shaped stent placement and coil occlusion of a complex, wide-neck aneurysm at the terminal portion of the left vertebral artery via a contralateral approach. This technique offers a viable endovascular option for patients with complex aneurysms of the vertebral basilar junction but should be reserved for appropriate cases with favorable anatomy when the ipsilateral approach from the subclavian artery is unobtainable.

ABBREVIATIONS

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

EVD

external ventricular drain

ICP

intracranial pressure

ICU

intensive care unit

ISAT

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial

PCoM

posterior communicating artery

PICA

posterior inferior cerebellar artery

SAH

subarachnoid hemorrhage

SCA

superior cerebellar artery

VBJ

vertebrobasilar junction

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

We have no conflict of interest.

Figure 1. AP (a) and lateral (b) projections of a three-dimensional rotational angiogram, showing a wide-neck, bi-lobed aneurysm at the vertebrobasilar junction, principally involving the left vertebral artery.

Figure 1

Figure 2. CT angiogram revealing proximal occlusion of the left vertebral artery.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) demonstrates the approach of the stent delivery system from the contralateral vertebral artery to the ipsilateral.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Postdeployment and coil embolization DSA reveals complete occlusion of the vertebrobasilar aneurysm.

Figure 4

REFERENCES

  1. Ecker RD, Hanel RA, Levy EI, Hopkins LN. Contralateral vertebral approach for stenting and coil embolization of a large, thrombosed vertebral-posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(6):1214–1216. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/12/1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Štimac D, Koruga N, Sekhar LN. Vertebrobasilar junction aneurysm: surgical treatment via far lateral transcondylar approach. Neurol Croat. 2011;60(1):43–50. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zenteno MA, Murillo-Bonilla LM, Guinto G, Gomez CR, Martinez SR, Higuera-Calleja J, Lee A, Gomez-Llata S. Sole stenting bypass for the treatment of vertebral artery aneurysms: technical case report. J Neurosurg. 2005;57(1 Suppl):E208. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000163683.64511.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peluso JP, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN. Aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar junction: incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1747–1751. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. ISAT of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267–1274. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kono K, Terada T. Hemodynamics of 8 different configurations of stenting for bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(10):1980–1986. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang JZ, Yang PF, Huang QH, Xu Y, Hong B, Zhao WY, Liu JM. Stent-assisted coiling strategies for the treatment of wide-necked basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(6):962–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yashar P, Kan PT, Levy EI. Horizontal deployment of an intracranial stent via an antegrade approach for coil embolization of a basilar apex aneurysm: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3(4):355–357. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2010.004481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pride GL, Jr, Welch B, Novakovic R, Rickert K, White J, Dutton-Johnson K, Samson D, Purdy P. Retrograde crossing stent placement strategies at the basilar apex for the treatment of wide necked aneurysms: reconstructive and deconstructive opportunities. J Neurointerv Surg. 2009;1(2):132–135. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.000182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jeon SI, Kwon BJ, Seo DH, Kang HI, Park SC, Choe IS. Bilateral approach for stent-assisted coiling of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms—two cases. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2012;14(3):223–227. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2012.14.3.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roh HG, Chun YI, Choi JW, Cho J, Moon WJ, Solander S. Retrograde stent placement for coil embolization of a wide-necked posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(4):510–514. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang J, Sun Z, Bao J, Li Z, Bai D, Cao S. Endovascular management of vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms. Turk Neurosurg. 2013;23(3):323–328. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.6513-12.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gemmete JJ, Elias AE, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS. Endovascular methods for the treatment of intracranial cerebral aneurysms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013;23(4):563–591. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heller RS, Rahal JP, Malek AM. Y-stent embolization technique for intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci . 2014. May 2, p. pii. S0967-5868(14)00057-5. [in press] [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Cross DT, 3rd, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Mazumdar A, Rivet D, Chicoine MM. Neuroform stent deployment for treatment of a basilar tip aneurysm via a posterior communicating artery route. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(10):2578–2581. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Puri AS, Erdem E. Unusual intracranial stent navigation through the circle of Willis in a patient with recurrent basilar tip aneurysm during stent-assisted coiling. Interv Neuroradiol. 2009;15(1):81–86. doi: 10.1177/159101990901500113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology are provided here courtesy of Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center

RESOURCES