Abstract
In host cells, viral replication is localized at specific subcellular sites. Viruses that infect eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells often use host-derived cytoskeletal structures, such as the actin skeleton, for intracellular positioning. Here, we describe that a prophage, CGP3, integrated into the genome of Corynebacterium glutamicum encodes an actin-like protein, AlpC. Biochemical characterization confirms that AlpC is a bona fide actin-like protein and cell biological analysis shows that AlpC forms filamentous structures upon prophage induction. The co-transcribed adaptor protein, AlpA, binds to a consensus sequence in the upstream promoter region of the alpAC operon and also interacts with AlpC, thus connecting circular phage DNA to the actin-like filaments. Transcriptome analysis revealed that alpA and alpC are among the early induced genes upon excision of the CGP3 prophage. Furthermore, qPCR analysis of mutant strains revealed that both AlpA and AlpC are required for efficient phage replication. Altogether, these data emphasize that AlpAC are crucial for the spatio-temporal organization of efficient viral replication. This is remarkably similar to actin-assisted membrane localization of eukaryotic viruses that use the actin cytoskeleton to concentrate virus particles at the egress sites and provides a link of evolutionary conserved interactions between intracellular virus transport and actin.
INTRODUCTION
DNA of viral origin, including fully functional prophages, cryptic (degenerated) prophage elements or phage morons, represents a common element of bacterial genomes (1,2). Upon prophage induction, e.g. triggered by the host SOS response, temperate phages enter the lytic pathway leading to the excision of the viral DNA from the genome, replication, virion assembly and lysis of the host cell (3,4). Recent reports revealed that viral replication in prokaryotes appears to be organized at specific intracellular locations and this process relies on the action of cytoskeletal proteins (5).
Cytoskeletal elements in eu- and prokaryotes are involved in a variety of different cellular processes (6,7). During mitotic segregation, eukaryotic chromosomes are moved by microtubules that attach to the centromere (6,8). In bacterial cells, mechanistically similar DNA segregation processes have been described (7,9–16). Best understood is the segregation of plasmid DNA via a tripartite partitioning system. The genetic organization of par loci is similar for both chromosome- and plasmid-encoded systems. In general, the par locus entails two trans-acting proteins encoded in an operon and cis-acting ‘centromere-like’ elements. The centromere-binding protein binds the centromere-like element forming a nucleoprotein complex (17–19). The segrosomes are recognized and segregated by the action of a partition protein, which, depending on the plasmid partitioning system, is either a Walker-A P-loop ATPase (ParA, Type I), an actin-like ATPase (ParM, Type II) or a tubulin-like GTPase (TubZ, Type III) (14,15,20–22). The precise partitioning mechanism remains under debate (23). Dynamic cytomotive filament pushing or pulling mechanisms have been supported for most actin and tubulin based segregation systems (21,24,25). Walker-A P-loop ATPase, on the other hand, have been proposed to employ a diffusion-ratchet model. In this model, the nucleotide bound from of the ATPase determines its affinity for the nucleoid. Combined with associated regulatory elements and intrinsic ATPase activity, gradients of the Walker-A ATPases form on the nucleoid. Rounds of nucleoid tethering and releasing lead to a directed movement of the DNA cargo (26,27). Active partitioning systems are imperative for efficient maintenance of low copy plasmids, such as P1 prophage from Escherichia coli (28–30).
Actin-like proteins also play a major role in cell growth and shape determination. MreB is the archetype of the bacterial cytoskeletal proteins (31–33). The MreB structure revealed homology to actin (34). MreB and its homologs are now known to be involved in the positioning of cell wall synthesizing complexes (35–38). Remarkably, MreB was also shown to be involved in viral replication. Replication of the Bacillus subtilis phage φ29 depends on the presence of all three MreB isoforms (MreB, Mbl and MreBH) (39–41). MreB apparently interacts with a phage-encoded membrane protein p16.7. Similarly, replication of the E. coli phage PRD1 is reduced upon inhibition of MreB. Recently, a tubulin-like protein, PhuZ, from bacteriophage 201φ2-1 was described to form spindle-like filaments in vivo thereby positioning the phage DNA within the cell (42,43).
In this study, we identified and characterized a novel actin-like protein encoded by the cryptic prophage CGP3 located in the genome of Corynebacterium glutamicum strain ATCC 13032. The genome of this important industrial platform organism harbors three cryptic prophages, CGP1–3, of which only CGP3 has been shown to replicate extra-chromosomally in a circularized form (44). CGP3 encompasses with 187 kb almost 6% of the entire C. glutamicum genome and belongs to the largest phage elements with known sequence (45). A cluster of tRNA genes is found on the left periphery of the CGP3 phage, while the right border encodes a putative phage integrase. The element is flanked by conserved attachment sites (44). Spontaneous induction of the CGP3 phage in a subpopulation of cells (1–3%) has been reported previously (44). However, CGP3 appeared to be inactive in terms of cell lysis and virion production and is therefore referred to as a cryptic prophage, which likely became trapped in the genome in the course of evolution.
Here, we describe that the first open reading frame in the CGP3 prophage encodes an actin-like protein, AlpC, and adjacent a phage DNA-binding protein, AlpA. Both AlpC and AlpA are necessary for efficient phage replication in vivo. Further, we show that AlpA binds a consensus sequence on the phage DNA molecules. The actin-like protein AlpC assembles into filaments that interact with the AlpA bound CGP3 DNA, which may function as a scaffold for the organization efficient viral replication. Corynebacterium glutamicum does not encode an MreB homlog, thus it would seem advantageous that the C. glutamicum CGP3 prophage encodes its own cytoskeletal element. Our data suggest that bacterial phages use an actin-based transport system, analogous to vertebrate viruses such as the herpesvirus which use host cell derived cytoskeletal elements (46,47).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Recombinant DNA work
Standard methods like PCR, restriction or ligation were carried out according to established protocols (48,49). Oligonucleotide synthesis and DNA sequencing was performed by Eurofins MWG Operon (Ebersfeld, Germany). Strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Strain construction is described in the Supplemental Materials and Methods.
Determination of circular phage DNA using quantitative PCR
The relative amount of circular phage DNA was determined via quantitative PCR (qPCR). Therefore, C. glutamicum wild type, the alpC deletion strain, and the alpA deletion strain were grown in 5 ml BHI (Brain Heart Infusion, Difco) for about 6 h at 30°C. A second precultivation was performed in CGXII minimal medium containing 4% glucose as carbon source. From each preculture two main cultures were inoculated to an OD600 of 1 in CGXII minimal medium. At an OD600 of 3 mitomycin C (final concentration of 0.6 μM) was added to one culture to induce the SOS response; the second, untreated culture served as reference. Five milliliters samples were harvested by centrifugation (4000 x g, 10 min and 4°C) at different time points after induction (0–24 h). The preparation of genomic DNA was performed as described previously (50).
The determination of the relative amount of circular DNA of the phage CGP3 by quantitative PCR was conducted according to the protocol described in Frunzke et al. (44). Briefly, each sample contained 1 μg total DNA as a template for amplification. Amplification was performed using the DyNAmo Capillary SYBR Green qPCR Kit (Finnzymes Oy, Vantaa) and a LightCycler type 1.0 (Roche Diagnostics). The ddh gene (cg2900), which is present in one copy in the C. glutamicum genome, served as reference gene for normalization; the oligonucleotides ddh-LC-for and ddh-LC-rev were used for amplification. For the detection of circular CGP3 DNA, oligonucleotides (Phage-LC-for and Phage-LC-rev) were designed which anneal to the left and right boarder of CGP3, pointing into divergent directions. This arrangement was used to specifically amplify a 150 bp DNA fragment covering the attachment site (attP) of the excised circular CGP3 DNA molecule. For the calculation of the relative amount of the circular phage DNA, the amount of the circular phage DNA in induced cells was normalized with the amount of circular phage DNA in uninduced cells of the same strain at each time point.
DNA microarrays
For transcriptome analysis cells were cultivated as described for the determination of circular CGP3 DNA (previous paragraph). Transcriptomes of C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 were comparisons of cells treated with or without 0.6 mM mitomycin C after 1, 3, 6 and 9 h after addition of mitomycin C. The custom DNA microarrays were obtained from Agilent Technologies (Waldbronn, Germany). Agilent's eArray platform was used to design oligonucleotide probes with the best probe methodology and assemble custom 4×44K 60mer microarray designs (https://earray.chem.agilent.com/earray/). The custom design included oligonucleotides for the annotated protein-coding genes and structural RNA genes of the four bacterial genomes from C. glutamicum, Escherichia coli, Gluconobacter oxydans and B. subtilis for genome-wide gene expression analysis. For C. glutamicum, the genome annotation NC_006958 from NCBI was used listing 3057 protein coding genes and 80 structural tRNA and ribosomal RNA genes (45). In the custom design, C. glutamicum genes are represented by one, two or three oligonucleotides which were used to determine relative RNA levels. The custom array design also included the Agilent's control spots. Purified cDNA samples to be compared were pooled and prepared two-color samples were hybridized on 4×44K arrays at 65°C for 17 h using Agilent's gene expression hybridization kit, Agilent's hybridization chamber and Agilent's hybridization oven. After hybridization the arrays were washed using Agilent's wash buffer kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fluorescence of hybridized DNA microarrays was determined at 532 nm (Cy3-dUTP) and 635 nm (Cy5-dUTP) at 5 μm resolution with a GenePix 4000B laser scanner and GenePix Pro 6.0 software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Fluorescence images were saved to raw data files in TIFF format (GenePix Pro 6.0). Quantitative TIFF image analysis was carried out using GenePix image analysis software and the Agilent's gene array list (GAL) file. The results were saved as GPR-file (GenePix Pro 6.0). For background correction of spot intensities, ratio calculation and ratio normalization, GPR-files were processed using the BioConductor R-packages limma and marray (http://www.bioconductor.org). For further analysis, the processed and lowess-normalized data as well as detailed experimental information according to MIAME (51) were stored in the in house DNA microarray database (52). To search the data for differentially expressed genes by the processed Cy5/Cy3 ratio reflecting the relative RNA level, the criteria flags ≥0 (GenePix Pro 6.0) and signal/noise ≥5 for Cy5 (F635Median/B635Median) or Cy3 (F532Median/B532Median) were used. Array data were deposited in the GEO database (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) under accession number GSE45907.
Heterologous protein expression and purification
His10-AlpC was heterogolously overproduced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS. Expression was induced with 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000 × g (4°C) for 10 min, resuspended in buffer A (100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 10 mM imidazole), supplemented with DNase I and protease inhibitor. The cleared cell lysate was applied to a 1 ml HisTrap™ FF column, washed with 10 column volumes of buffer A and subsequently eluted by a step gradient of buffer B (buffer A supplemented with 490 mM imidazole). The affinity purified AlpC protein was further applied to a SuperdexTM 200 10/300 gel filtration column and eluted in buffer C (buffer A lacking imidazole). Eluted fractions were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting. Heterologous overexpression and purification of AlpCD301A was identical.
The production of His10-AlpA in E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG and harvested after 4 h of expression as described for His10-AlpC. The disruption of the cells and purification of the protein with a Ni2+-NTA column (nickel-nitriloacetic acid) (Qiagen, Hilden) were performed as described previously (53). The elution of AlpA was conducted with TNI400 buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 400 mM imidazole). The fractions of eluted protein were pooled and the buffer was exchanged to binding buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.005% (w/v) Triton X-100) with a PD10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) for DNA–protein binding studies.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
Studies of the DNA–protein binding of AlpA and potential target DNA were performed according to (54). The DNA (500 bp) of the upstream region of alpA and downstream region of alpC were amplified by PCR. The promoter region of cg2036, a gene encoded by the prophage CGP3 in C. glutamicum, was tested as control fragment. 100 ng DNA per lane were incubated with different molar ratios of purified AlpA (0–500-fold molar excess) for 20 min before loading to a nondenaturing 10% polyacrylamide gel.
Nucleotide hydrolysis assay
ATPase and GTPase activity was measured in a coupled enzyme assay constantly regenerating ATP/GTP, allowing monitoring of ATP hydrolysis over time (55). The regeneration of ATP/GTP is coupled to the oxidation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phophate (NADH). When ADP/GDP is converted back to ATP/GTP pyruvate kinase converts phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to pyruvate. Lactate dehydrogenase then converts the pyruvate to lactate, resulting in the oxidation of one NADH molecule. The decrease of NADH absorbance at 340 nm is monitored over time.
Nucleotide hydrolysis rate of 1 μM protein was performed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol. The reaction was performed in a total volume of 100 μl containing varying nucleotide concentration, equimolar MgSO4, 1 mM PEP, 0.6 mM NADH, 20 U/ml pyruvate kinase and 20 U/ml lactate dehydrogenase. The samples were set-up in a 96-well microtiter plate and the absorbance of NADH was monitored at 340 nm for 1 h at 30°C (Tecan Plate Reader, software: I-control). All data were obtained from triplicate determination and corrected for nucleotide autohydrolysis.
Sedimentation assay
Prior to experimental setup, protein samples were subjected to centrifugation at 120 000 × g for 10 min to remove any aggregated protein. Purified protein (2 μM) was mixed with nucleotide (2 μM) in the presence or absence of 2 μM Mg2+ or 4 μM EDTA. Volumes were adjusted to 100 μl with buffer C. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 30 min. Higher-ordered AlpC protein complexes were then sedimentated by centrifugation at 120 × 000 g for 10 min. Supernatant and pellet fractions were separated and quantitatively analyzed by immunoblot.
For quantitative western blot analyses His10-AlpC and His10-AlpCD301A from the sedimentation assays, samples were blotted onto an Immobilon-FL PVDF membrane (Millipore) and probed with anti-His antibody (Qiagen), followed by IRDye 800-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibodies (LI-COR) as secondary antibody. The IR fluorescence signals were quantified with the OdysseyTM IR fluorescence scanning system (LI-COR). Background values were automatically subtracted using the Odyssey software (LICOR) (Median Top/Bottom method). Signals were normalized to a protein only sample.
Co-sedimentation assay
To test for interaction of AlpA and AlpC, co-sedimentation assays with purified proteins were performed. AlpC and AlpA were mixed in equimolar ratio (5 μM, respectively, in a reaction volume of 20 μl) in EMSA buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.005% (w/v) Triton X-100). The mixture was incubated at 30°C for 30 min in the presence or absence of 1 mM ATP and/or 100 ng DNA (500 bp fragment of the upstream region of alpA). The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 16 100 × g for 1 h. The supernatant was withdrawn and the sedimented protein was resuspended in the same volume. Both fractions were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining. The amount of sedimented AlpA protein was quantified by using ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare).
Fluorescence microscopy
For microscopic examination, expression from the pEKEx2 plasmid was induced by addition of 0.5 mM IPTG to the growth medium, for ∼60–90 min. For co-visualization of eCFP-AlpC filament and induced CGP3 prophage, cells were grown in CGXII medium supplemented with 4% glucose. Excision of the CGP3 prophage was induced by addition of mitomycin C (final concentration 0.6 μg/ml or as indicated in text). Approximately 30 min prior to microscopic examination, 0.1 mM IPTG was added to induce synthesis of YFP-TetR. AlpC-mCherry expressed from its native promoter was induced by addition of 5 μM mitomycin C.
For phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy, 1–3 μl of a culture sample was placed on a microscope slide coated with a thin 1% agarose layer and covered by a cover slip. Images were taken on a Zeiss AxioImager M1 equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam HRm camera or on a Zeiss AxioImager M2 equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera. GFP fluorescence was monitored using filter set 38 HE eGFP, BG-430 fluorescence and CFP (eCFP) were monitored using filter 47 HE CFP, red fluorescence (membrane stain) was monitored by using filter 43 HE Cy3 or filter 63He and DAPI / Hoechst fluorescence was examined with filter set 49. An EC Plan-Neofluar 100x/1.3 Oil Ph3 objective was used. Digital images were acquired and analyzed with the AxioVision 4.6 software (Carl Zeiss). Final image preparation was done using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe Systems Incorporated).
Time lapse and FRAP analysis was carried out using a Delta Vision Elite (GE Healthcare, Applied Precision) equipped with an Insight SSI™ illumination, an X4 laser module and a CoolSnap HQ2 CCD camera. Images were taken with a 100× oil PSF U-Plan S-Apo 1.4 NA objective.
FRAP analysis
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments were performed using a C. glutamicum strain expressing AlpC-mCherry under control of the native promoter, but encoded on a plasmid (pEC-XC99E-PalpA-alpC-mcherry). Induction of AlpC expression was initiated with 5 μM mitomycin C addition to exponentially growing cells. Cells were mounted on BHI agar pads at 30°C. Cells were imaged using an DeltaVision Elite system (GE Healthcare) using the SSI illumination system with the following settings: mCherry excitation 50% SSI with 0,2 s exposure. Bleaching was done with a 561 nm laser (50 mW) at 10% power and a 100x Oil PSF Objective (U-PLAN S-APO 100X Oil, 1.4NA, 0.12 WD). The duration of the laser pulse was 0.01 s. Time lapse image series were taken every 10 s and the laser event was placed after the first image. Dark-state reversal of the mCherry fluorophore was controlled for by fixing cells with 1% formaldehyde prior to image analysis (30 min room temperature). Images were analyzed with Fiji and values were normalized for both bleaching and cytoplasmic background fluorescence. Relative values were used in order to allow comparison between cells, where a value of 1 corresponds to the fluorescence intensity before the bleaching event and a value of 0 corresponds to the cytoplasmic background fluorescence. The cytoplasmic background fluorescence value is the average between the cytoplasmic fluorescence of three cells selected from the analyzed microscope image. Subtraction of cytoplasmic fluorescence from the original fluorescence value highlights filament dependent fluorescent signals.
Bleaching due to imaging was calculated by averaging the decrease of relative fluorescence in three independent areas of the microscope image not affected by the laser bleaching event. Images were assembled in Adobe Photoshop and graphs plotted with Microsoft Excel.
RESULTS
A prophage-encoded cytoskeletal protein
In previous work, our labs have shown that the C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 prophage CGP3 is able to excise from the chromosome and replicate autonomously (44). The first open reading frame in the prophage, cg1890, shows low sequence identity to bacterial actins (Figure 1). Recently, a phylogenetic analysis identified Cg1890 as an actin-like protein (56). Cg1890 shares considerably low sequence identity (mostly <30%) with actin and other actin-like proteins, however the typical actin signature motif is conserved (Figure 1B). Hence, we renamed Cg1890 to AlpC (designated AlpC, for Actin-Like Protein Corynebacterium). The actin signature motifs are involved in binding nucleotide in the presence of a divalent cation and catalyzing the transfer of a phosphoryl group from ATP to a hydroxyl group (57,58). Amide residues from the conserved loops of the phosphate 1 and phosphate 2 motifs are involved in hydrogen bonding with the β- and γ-phosphates of ATP (58). The connect 1 sequence makes interactions with the metal ion complexed to ATP.
A phylogenetic search revealed that among actin-like proteins AlpC and homologous proteins are closer related to plasmid partitioning systems (ParM) than to MreB-type cytoskeletal proteins (Figure 1C). Homologous proteins of C. glutamicum AlpC were found to be, in most cases, plasmid-encoded and were identified in a variety of Gram-positive bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bacillus species as well as the pathogen Clostridium perfringes (Figure 1C). While the phylogenetic analysis carried out by Derman and coworkers identified of a large number of actin-like proteins (56), the role of phage-encoded actin-like proteins has not been studied in further detail, yet.
AlpC hydrolyzes nucleotides in vitro
A distinguishing feature of actin and actin related proteins is the ability to hydrolyze nucleotides. In order to analyze nucleotide hydrolysis of AlpC, a recombinant His-tagged variant of AlpC and a mutant AlpC variant lacking the conserved aspartic acid of the phosphate 2 motif (AlpCD301A) were overproduced in the heterogolous bacterium E. coli and purified. In a nucleotide hydrolysis assay, the activity of 1 μM of purified protein was measured with increasing concentrations of ATP or GTP (Figure 2A). Akin to other characterized actin-like proteins, AlpC can hydrolyze both ATP and GTP, and exhibits Michaelis–Menten kinetics. In the presence of ATP, the maximum turnover rate is reached at slightly lower substrate concentrations compared to GTP. In the presence of GTP, AlpC has a Vmax of 4.3 mM min−1, compared to 3.75 mM min−1 for ATP (Figure 2A). The measured Km is low and does not differ significantly between ATP and GTP, 0.2 mM and 0.43 mM, respectively. In vivo, the more abundant ATP is probably the favored substrate. Nucleotide hydrolysis is abolished in the AlpCD301A mutant (Figure 2A).
AlpC assembles into higher-ordered oligomeric complexes, in vitro and in vivo
One of the defining properties of actin and related cytoskeletal proteins is the ability to polymerize into filamentous structures in vivo. To determine if AlpC assembles into higher-ordered oligomeric complexes in vitro, sedimentation assays were performed (Figure 2B). After removal of potential protein aggregates by centrifugation, 2 μM of purified protein was incubated for 30 min at 30°C in the presence or absence of nucleotide, Mg2+ and EDTA as indicated in Figure 2B. The higher-ordered oligomeric AlpC complexes were isolated by centrifugation. Sedimentation of AlpC was dependent on the presence of nucleotide (ATP or GTP) and Mg2+. Addition of the metal chelator EDTA abolished sedimentation of AlpC, ruling out sedimentation of protein aggregates. The inactive mutant AlpCD301A did not exhibit a nucleotide-dependent sedimentation behavior (Figure 2B). Sedimentation of AlpCD301A was observed when incubated in the presence of ATP only or GTP and Mg2+, however assembly into higher-ordered AlpCD301A complexes was not observed when incubated in the presence of nucleotide, Mg2+ and EDTA
In order to study the behavior of AlpC at physiological concentration, the native alpC locus was replaced with an ecfp-alpC allele (CDC020, Supplementary Table S1). Under conditions of prophage induction using mitomycin C, eCFP-AlpC (CDC020) readily assembled into filaments (Figure 3A). AlpC filaments or foci were observed in the vast majority of cells. The filaments were varying in length, straight and mostly found pointing to the cell membrane at different angles. These results suggest that AlpC expression and filament formation occurs in response to induction of the CGP3 prophage.
The low level of eCFP-AlpC (CDC020) produced when expressed at physiological concentration made it unsuitable for further analysis, such as analysis of filament distribution or time lapse. Consequently, alpC-cfp, encoding a fusion protein of AlpC and CFP, was expressed from a pEKEx2 plasmid (CDC021, Supplementary Table S1), bringing the fusion gene under control of an IPTG inducible promoter. In the majority of cells (97.2%, n = 870), AlpC-CFP (CDC021) assembled into numerous long and curved filaments, often extending from one pole to the other (Figure 3B). However, some cells contained either a combination of filaments and foci or only foci. To gain more insight into the distribution of the AlpC-CFP filaments within the cell, Z-stacks were acquired. As shown in Figure 3C (and Movie S1), a number of long, curved filaments extending the length of the cell were observed, some filaments appearing to elongate close to the cell membrane. Thus, akin to actin and related cytoskeletal proteins AlpC can readily polymerizes forming filamentous structures in vivo. The catalytically inactive mutant AlpCD301A also assembled into filaments in vivo when overproduced (CDC022, Supplementary Table S1) (Figure 3B). However, the frequency of filament formation was drastically reduced (1.6%, n = 750) and the morphology of the AlpCD301A filaments was different from the wild type protein.
AlpC filaments are dynamic
In vivo, filaments of the actin-like protein ParM involved in plasmid partition were shown to be extremely dynamic, undergoing bursts of rapid growth and catastrophic decay (59). Although such dynamic instability is not a distinguishing feature of actin and actin-like proteins, filament dynamics is essential for protein function. To ascertain if C. glutamicum AlpC is also dynamic, time-lapse analysis was carried out. For this purpose a strain harboring a plasmid-encoded AlpC-CFP translational fusion was used (CDC021, Supplementary Table S1). Cells were grown in BHI medium, induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 1 h prior to microscopic analysis. Cells were placed on a microscopic slide coated with 1% agarose in BHI. Images were acquired at 5 s intervals for a total of 60 s. The time lapse analysis revealed that AlpC-CFP (CDC021) filaments are indeed dynamic (Figure 3D and Movie S2). While some filaments appear to move along the membrane, other filaments curl into the cytoplasm. In vivo, filament assembly of the catalytically inactive mutant (AlpCD301A-CFP, CDC022) is not completely abolished, however the frequency of filament formation is greatly reduced (Figure 3B). The AlpCD301A-CFP filaments are more stable and, hence less dynamic than wild-type AlpC filaments (Figure 3E, Movie S3). Filament dynamics were further studied using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments. For this purpose, we constructed a strain harboring a plasmid-encoded AlpC-mCherry under control of the native promoter. This system allows for moderate AlpC-mCherry overproduction. The AlpC-mCherry strain was necessary for FRAP experiments because the natural level of AlpC leads to shorter filaments which will be bleached almost entirely and hence do not allow for FRAP analysis. AlpC-mCherry induction was achieved by addition of 5 μM mitomycin C. Readily, cells produced long, curved AlpC-mCherry filaments (Supplementary Figure S1). Parts of these filaments were bleached using the 561 nm laser and a subsequent time lapse series with image acquisition at 10 s intervals revealed rapid recovery of the AlpC-mCherry (Figure 4A and B, Movie S4). We controlled for dark-state-reversal of the mCherry fluorophore by fixing the cells with 1% formaldehyde. Subsequent FRAP experiments did not reveal any recovery of the mCherry fluorophore (Supplementary Figure S2, Movie S5), suggesting that the fast initial recovery is not a result of photoswitching, but reflects the true dynamics of the AlpC protein.
Identification of an AlpC adaptor protein
Actin-like proteins encoded on plasmids are often co-transcribed with an adaptor protein, which connects the actin filament with the plasmid DNA. In many cases, the adaptor protein stimulates or stabilizes the actin filaments (20,24,60,61). AlpC is encoded in a putative operon together with Cg1891, a protein of unknown function (Figure 1A). We postulated that Cg1891 could be an adaptor that couples phage DNA to AlpC filaments. Hence, we renamed cg1891 to alpA (A for adaptor). To test whether AlpA binds to specific DNA regions, purified His10-AlpA protein was analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). We tested DNA fragments covering the up- and downstream region of the putative alpA–alpC operon (Figure 5A). The upstream region was specifically bound by AlpA, in vitro (Figure 5B). A smear of shifted DNA rather than a clear band was observed, indicating an oligomerization of the protein along the DNA, presumably at more than one binding site (62). The downstream region and the control DNA fragment (upstream of the CGP3 gene cg2040) showed no binding of AlpA.
Analysis of the alpAC promoter region revealed the presence of 24 conserved DNA repeats (designated as alpS) (Figure 6A). EMSA studies with purified AlpA were carried out to determine if AlpA binds to DNA fragments covering these repeats (Figure 6B). As outlined in Figure 6A, DNA fragments covering various portions of the alpAC promoter region were used for EMSA analysis. Both sub-fragments 1 and 2, which covered the majority of the conserved DNA repeats of the promoter region, displayed AlpA binding. The third sub-fragment and the control DNA, both of which lack DNA repeats, do not appear to be bound by AlpA. Using the MEME suite software a consensus motif was derived (TTAAnnG), which revealed five highly conserved bases within the alpS motif (Figure 6C, and Supplementary Figure S3). However, this DNA motif is not unique to the alpAC operon. In comparison to the whole genome, the alpS motif is more concentrated at the alpAC operon. These results suggest that AlpA binds to conserved DNA repeats, alpS, of the promoter region, however analysis of the exact mechanism will require further studies.
Co-localization of AlpA and AlpC in vivo
To support our hypothesis that AlpA is an adaptor protein linking CGP3 DNA to the AlpC filament, localization of both proteins was studied in vivo. For this purpose, an in-frame deletion of alpA was constructed in the background of strain CDC020, in which alpC was replaced by allelic exchange with ecfp-alpC. Deletion of alpA had no influence on the formation of eCFP-AlpC filaments. AlpC also assembles into filaments when expressed in E. coli in the absence of AlpA (data not shown). To generate a strain that allows co-visualization of both AlpA and AlpC the alpA gene was fused to eyfp and cloned under control of the native promoter in the ΔalpA alpC::ecfp-alpC background (ATCC 13032 ΔalpA alpC::ecfp-alpC PalpA-alpA-eyfp, Supplementary Table S1). Fluorescence microscopy revealed foci of AlpA-eYFP, which formed upon induction of CGP3 by addition of mitomycin C. Frequently, one to two foci of AlpA-eYFP per cell were observed at various positions; in a few cases up to four foci were detected in single cells. Remarkably, AlpA-eYFP foci were observed at the tips or aligned with AlpC filaments (Figure 5C). In 78% (n = 37) of cells at least one AlpA focus was found to be associated with an AlpC filament. Co-localization was further confirmed with plasmid-encoded variants of AlpA-eYFP and AlpC-mCherry. In agreement with the genomic replacement, co-localization of AlpA-eYFP foci and AlpC-mCherry filaments was observed in 91% of the cells (n = 116, Supplementary Figure S1). In both experiments, the angle of the filaments and the position of the putative adaptor protein foci were, however, variable. The co-localization of AlpA and AlpC suggested that AlpA might move along the preformed AlpC filament track. To further reinforce this idea and that AlpA is AlpC-CGP3 adaptor protein, live cell time lapse co-visualization of AlpA-eYFP and AlpC-mCherry was carried out. Again, prior to microscopic analysis, cells were treated with mitomycin C to induce the CGP3 prophage. Time lapse analysis revealed that the AlpA-eYFP foci move along the AlpC-mCherry filament (Figure 7B and MovieS6).
In vivo co-visualization of the CGP3 viral DNA and AlpC filaments
The CGP3 prophage and eCFP-AlpC (CDC020), where AlpC is expressed at the physiological level, were co-visualized in vivo by fluorescence microscopy. Visualization of CGP3 DNA was carried out as described previously (44). Basically, an array of tetO operator regions of transposon Tn10 was integrated into an intergenic region within the CGP3 prophage region. Co-expression of plasmid-encoded yfp-tetR allowed direct visualization of the prophage region. Prophage induction was triggered by mitomycin C addition. In many cells an increased number of foci corresponding to CGP3 DNA were visible (44). In these cells, eCFP-AlpC filaments or foci were readily observed. The eCFP-AlpC foci often co-localized with the CGP3 prophage foci (33%, n = 56) (Figure 7A). In many cases cells containing an AlpC filament had CGP3 DNA at the filament end. We noticed that most AlpC filaments point in an angle to the membrane and seem to push the phage DNA towards the cell membrane. Indeed, phage DNA is mostly found at the cell membrane (Figure 7A).
AlpA interacts with AlpC in vitro
The binding of AlpA to phage DNA as well as the co-localization of AlpA foci with AlpC filaments, suggest a direct interaction of AlpAC, coupling the CGP3 DNA with the AlpC filament. To test this possibility further, we carried out co-sedimentation assays with AlpA and AlpC. While AlpC exhibits a nucleotide dependent sedimentation behavior, AlpA did not sediment after incubation with ATP, DNA or a combination of ATP and DNA (Supplementary Figure S4). When AlpA and AlpC were incubated in the presence of ATP or ATP and DNA, a significant fraction (30% and 38%, respectively) of AlpA protein co-sedimented with AlpC (Figure 5D). BSA served as a control protein, which did not co-sediment with AlpC (Supplementary Figure S4). Further support for a direct interaction between AlpA and AlpC filaments is provided by a super shift experiment where oligomerization of AlpC in the presence of ATP led to a super shift of AlpA-bound alpS DNA (Supplementary Figure S5).
AlpA and AlpC are required for efficient CGP3 replication
To investigate the physiological role of the actin-like protein AlpC and the adaptor protein AlpA, and respective roles in the replication and/or segregation of the prophage CGP3, in-frame deletion mutants lacking the alpC and alpA gene were constructed. Deletion of either alpC or alpA has no recognizable growth phenotype. In order to analyze the impact of AlpC and AlpC on CGP3 replication, C. glutamicum was treated with mitomycin C to induce prophage excision and replication. The intracellular amount of circular phage DNA significantly increased and reached ∼10-fold induction in mitomycin C treated cells after 6 h. Quantification of the intracellular amount of circular CGP3 DNA by qPCR in wild type and ΔalpC strains revealed a similar progression (Figure 8A). However, the maximal amount of circular CGP3 DNA was ∼2-fold reduced in ΔalpC cells compared to wild type. As observed for ΔalpC, the maximal amount of phage DNA was ∼2-fold reduced in ΔalpA. Deletion of the CGP3 encoded cg2040, a Cro/CI type regulator, did not alter the amount of circular phage DNA (data not shown). A complementation strain encoding AlpC-CFP had no significant difference to wild type, indicating that the fusion construct is functional (data not shown). The number of induced CGP3 phages was also quantified by means of fluorescent micrsocopy, in vivo. Thereby, the alpC gene was deleted in the ATCC 13032::pLAU44-CGP3-Spec strain background. In the absence of alpC (strain CDC024), the average number of CGP3 per cell was reduced compared to WT cells (1.9% and 2.9%, respectively (n ≥ 210)) (Supplementary Figure S6). These results indicate that AlpC is directly influencing CGP3 replication in vivo.
Transcriptome analysis revealed that both genes, alpC and alpA, are among the early genes of CGP3 induced upon treatment with mitomycin C (Figure 8B). The expression of alpC and alpA was 3–4-fold up-regulated 1 h after induction, whereas the majority of CGP3 genes showed an increased mRNA level after 3–6 h (Figure 8C). Further genes showing a >4-fold upregulation after 1 h include cg1962 and cg1977, encoding hypothetical proteins, as well as cg1996–1998 encoding a restriction modification system (cglIMR). Remarkably, cg1977 and the operon cg1996–1998 are both under direct control of LexA itself, explaining their high induction upon addition of mitomycin C. Altogether, early expression of alpC and alpA in the course of CGP3 induction and the reduced level of circular CGP3 DNA in the two deletion mutants emphasizes the participation of AlpC and AlpA in the early stages of phage induction and/or synthesis, such as replication of phage DNA.
DISCUSSION
Virus particles can hijack the host cell cytoskeleton for active movement within the infected cells. Crucial for this is a dynamic assembly of a scaffold that can either serve as a molecular track or generate an intrinsic movement. Examples of such cytomotive filaments are prokaryotic actin-like proteins. Actin and actin-related proteins share limited sequence and structural similarity (33,34,63,64). The formation of dynamic filamentous structures in vivo is common to both eukaryotic and prokaryotic actin homologs. In C. glutamicum, AlpC readily assembles into long curved filaments when overproduced (Figure 3B and C). At physiological concentration, AlpC assembled into short straight filaments, in addition to formation of compact foci (Figures 5C and 7A). The dynamics of actin-like filaments varies and is often linked to the mode of subunit assembly, stability and function of the protein in question (65). ParM, for example, exhibits extreme dynamic instability, displaying bursts of growth followed by rapid decay (24,59,66). Stabilization of the ParM filament, which comprises of two antiparallel filaments, requires that one end of each ParM filament, is capped with a ParR bound plasmid (60,67). Thus, the dynamic instability of the ParM filament is intrinsic to the mode of action in plasmid segregation. Similarly, the mode of action of Alp7A filaments in plasmid segregation requires that both ends of the filament are capped with a plasmid (56). The actin-like protein AlfA assembles into stable long-lived filaments by addition of subunits to one end of the filament only (61). Although the mechanism by which Alp7A segregates plasmids is not well understood, it differs from ParM mediated segregation (20,61). AlpC filaments exhibited a dynamic behavior (Figure 4A and Movie S4); however, unlike ParM and Alp7A dynamic instability was not observed (24,56,59,66).
Initially, we speculated that AlpC might function to actively segregate excised prophage DNA, akin to plasmid segregation systems. However, the genetic organization of the alpAC operon differs (Figure 1A) from known chromosome/plasmid segregation loci (ParM, ParR), which encode a motor protein upstream of the DNA-binding adaptor protein. An example of a similar genetic organization is found in Gordonia sp. KTR8, where two gene homologs to alpA and alpC are found on the plasmid pGKT2 (Figure 1A). In this case, the two proteins might play a role in plasmid segregation. In cells that contained multiple CGP3 foci and AlpC filaments, interaction between AlpC filaments and at least one phage DNA molecule was observed (Figure 7A and B), arguing against a role in segregation of two phage genomes into daughter cells. In the light of recent studies, which indicate that induction of the cryptic prophage CGP3 leads to cell death (Pfeifer & Frunzke, submitted for publication) a function of AlpAC in the segregation of CGP3 DNA into dividing daughter cells appears unlikely. Although CGP3 represents a cryptic, degenerated prophage element several functions, including the excision from the host genome, the SOS-dependent control of the lysogenic switch and the killing of the host cell, represent conserved processes of a lytic cycle (68).
The DNA of the induced prophage often accumulated at the cell membrane (Figure 7A and B). There is an increasing amount of evidence suggesting that plasmid and phage replication occurs at a specific subcellular localization, e.g. at the membrane (5,39,41,69). The B. subtilis phage φ29 serves as a model for the study of phage replication. During the early stages of infection phage replication takes place at the bacterial nucleoid and later in the infection cycle replication is redirected to the bacterial membrane (5,39,41,69). Here, we speculate that excised CGP3 phage DNA is directed to the membrane where additional replication occurs. Based on our data, we propose that circular CGP3 DNA is connected to AlpC filaments via the adaptor protein AlpA, which interacts with alpS repeats upstream of the alpAC promoter (Figures 5 and 6). Consistent with this idea, cells lacking AlpC or AlpA have a 2-fold decrease in phage copy number (Figure 8), which phenocopies the impact of a phuZ deletion on the replication of phage 201φ2-1 DNA (43) and, thus, clearly suggests a concerted role of AlpAC in CGP3 phage replication.
Recently, reports on phage-encoded tubulin homologs have been published (43,70). Both reports describe that phage-encoded PhuZ (43) and TubZ (70) are required for correct phage placement in the infected host. Interestingly, the two reports arrive at different conclusions. PhuZ is encoded in the Pseudomonas phage 201φ2-1 and forms GTP hydrolysis dependent dynamic filaments in vivo and in vitro (43). These filaments traverse the entire cell and are thought to assemble phage particles in the center of the cell. However, PhuZ was expressed from an inducible promoter. Here, we have observed a similar polymerization behavior of AlpC when it was overproduced in C. glutamicum, but got a different picture when alpC was expressed from the native promoter. Phage replication was also impaired in a PhuZ mutant background, suggesting that proper segregation is important for phage replication. The authors arrive at the conclusion that PhuZ forms a spindle-like apparatus that positions the virus particles in the cell center (43). Simultaneously, a TubZ homolog in the Clostridum botulinum phage c-st was shown to behave like a classical type II segregation system. TubZ binds to the centromeric region of the phage DNA via the adaptor protein TubR (70). Superficially, the c-st TubZ and AlpC share a similar mechanism, in particular since both are encoded by prophages that replicate as plasmid-like entities. However, close inspection of the results that we describe here, make it unlikely that the short AlpC filaments observed after induction of phage replication would be suited to segregate plasmid DNA into separating daughter cells. Rather, our data are consistent with AlpC guiding CGP3 DNA to the cell membrane, where replication likely occurs. Fluorescent co-localization of AlpC filaments and viral DNA show that phage DNA foci are often found in numerous copies at the membrane, while AlpC filaments only attach to single CGP3 molecules. In this aspect AlpC might resemble the role of eukaryotic F-actin in the anterograde transport of herpes-like viruses (46,47,71). The transport brings virus particles to the cell membrane. Actin plays, in fact, a prominent role as a host factor for viral replication in eukaryotes. Actin is not only required for anterograde transport, but also involved in uptake, retrograde transport to the nucleus, replication and long-range spread (47). This is in line with observations that link the B. subtilis actin homolog MreB with replication of phage φ29 (41). In the absence of MreB, phage polymerase and the putative membrane anchor p16.7 are delocalized. Consequently, phage replication was reduced. It may, therefore, be advantageous for phages replicating in bacteria lacking an endogenous actin cytoskeleton to encode this cytoskeletal element within their own genome. A unifying theme is that phages with large genomes seem to rely on cytoskeletal filaments for intracellular movement. Thus, it is plausible that the connection of actin and viral replication is ancient (72) and that the general principle is well conserved even between bacteria and phages.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Giacomo Giacomelli (LMU Munich) for help with the analysis of FRAP data.
FUNDING
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (priority program SPP 1617) [FR 2759/2-1]; Helmholtz Association (Young Investigator) [VH-NG-716]; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BR 2915/6-1]. Funding for open access charge: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (priority program SPP 1617) [FR 2759/2-1]; Helmholtz Association (Young Investigator) [VH-NG-716]; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BR 2915/6-1].
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Canchaya C., Fournous G., Brussow H. The impact of prophages on bacterial chromosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;53:9–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Casjens S. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;49:277–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oppenheim A.B., Kobiler O., Stavans J., Court D.L., Adhya S. Switches in bacteriophage lambda development. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005;39:409–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.113656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Węgrzyn G., Licznerska K., Węgrzyn A. Phage lambda—new insights into regulatory circuits. Adv. Virus Res. 2012;82:155–178. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394621-8.00016-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Erb M.L., Pogliano J. Cytoskeletal proteins participate in conserved viral strategies across kingdoms of life. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2013;16:786–789. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bloom K., Joglekar A. Towards building a chromosome segregation machine. Nature. 2010;463:446–456. doi: 10.1038/nature08912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Löwe J., Amos L.A. Evolution of cytomotive filaments: the cytoskeleton from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2009;41:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yanagida M. Basic mechanism of eukaryotic chromosome segregation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2005;360:609–621. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ptacin J.L., Lee S.F., Garner E.C., Toro E., Eckart M., Comolli L.R., Moerner W.E., Shapiro L. A spindle-like apparatus guides bacterial chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2010;12:791–798. doi: 10.1038/ncb2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gerdes K., Howard M., Szardenings F. Pushing and pulling in prokaryotic DNA segregation. Cell. 2010;141:927–942. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schumacher M.A. Structural biology of plasmid partition: uncovering the molecular mechanisms of DNA segregation. Biochem. J. 2008;412:1–18. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayes F., Barilla D. The bacterial segrosome: a dynamic nucleoprotein machine for DNA trafficking and segregation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;4:133–143. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ghosh S.K., Hajra S., Paek A., Jayaram M. Mechanisms for chromosome and plasmid segregation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006;75:211–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ebersbach G., Gerdes K. Plasmid segregation mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005;39:453–479. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gerdes K., Møller-Jensen J., Ebersbach G., Kruse T., Nordstrom K. Bacterial mitotic machineries. Cell. 2004;116:359–366. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fogel M.A., Waldor M.K. A dynamic, mitotic-like mechanism for bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 2006;20:3269–3282. doi: 10.1101/gad.1496506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Funnell B.E. Mini-P1 plasmid partitioning: excess ParB protein destabilizes plasmids containing the centromere parS. J. Bacteriol. 1988;170:954–960. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.2.954-960.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salje J., Gayathri P., Löwe J. The ParMRC system: molecular mechanisms of plasmid segregation by actin-like filaments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:683–692. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schumacher M.A., Funnell B.E. Structures of ParB bound to DNA reveal mechanism of partition complex formation. Nature. 2005;438:516–519. doi: 10.1038/nature04149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Becker E., Herrera N.C., Gunderson F.Q., Derman A.I., Dance A.L., Sims J., Larsen R.A., Pogliano J. DNA segregation by the bacterial actin AlfA during Bacillus subtilis growth and development. EMBO J. 2006;25:5919–5931. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Larsen R.A., Cusumano C., Fujioka A., Lim-Fong G., Patterson P., Pogliano J. Treadmilling of a prokaryotic tubulin-like protein, TubZ, required for plasmid stability in Bacillus thuringiensis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1340–1352. doi: 10.1101/gad.1546107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Donovan C., Schwaiger A., Krämer R., Bramkamp M. Subcellular localization and characterization of the ParAB system from Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Bacteriol. 2010;192:3441–3451. doi: 10.1128/JB.00214-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kiekebusch D., Thanbichler M. Plasmid segregation by a moving ATPase gradient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014;111:4741–4742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402867111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Garner E.C., Campbell C.S., Weibel D.B., Mullins R.D. Reconstitution of DNA segregation driven by assembly of a prokaryotic actin homolog. Science. 2007;315:1270–1274. doi: 10.1126/science.1138527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mølller-Jensen J., Jensen R.B., Löwe J., Gerdes K. Prokaryotic DNA segregation by an actin-like filament. EMBO J. 2002;21:3119–3127. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vecchiarelli A.G., Han Y.W., Tan X., Mizuuchi M., Ghirlando R., Biertumpfel C., Funnell B.E., Mizuuchi K. ATP control of dynamic P1 ParA-DNA interactions: a key role for the nucleoid in plasmid partition. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;78:78–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07314.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vecchiarelli A.G., Hwang L.C., Mizuuchi K. Cell-free study of F plasmid partition provides evidence for cargo transport by a diffusion-ratchet mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:E1390–E1397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302745110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Prentki P., Chandler M., Caro L. Replication of prophage P1 during the cell cycle of Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet.: MGG. 1977;152:71–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00264942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abeles A.L., Friedman S.A., Austin S.J. Partition of unit-copy miniplasmids to daughter cells. III. The DNA sequence and functional organization of the P1 partition region. J. Mol. Biol. 1985;185:261–272. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90402-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li Y., Dabrazhynetskaya A., Youngren B., Austin S. The role of Par proteins in the active segregation of the P1 plasmid. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;53:93–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chastanet A., Carballido-López R. The actin-like MreB proteins in Bacillus subtilis: a new turn. Front. Biosci. 2012;4:1582–1606. doi: 10.2741/s354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Carballido-López R., Formstone A. Shape determination in Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:611–616. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.van den Ent F., Amos L., Löwe J. Bacterial ancestry of actin and tubulin. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2001;4:634–638. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(01)00262-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van den Ent F., Amos L.A., Löwe J. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature. 2001;413:39–44. doi: 10.1038/35092500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jones L.J., Carballido-López R., Errington J. Control of cell shape in bacteria: helical, actin-like filaments in Bacillus subtilis. Cell. 2001;104:913–922. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00287-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Daniel R.A., Errington J. Control of cell morphogenesis in bacteria: two distinct ways to make a rod-shaped cell. Cell. 2003;113:767–776. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00421-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Garner E.C., Bernard R., Wang W., Zhuang X., Rudner D.Z., Mitchison T. Coupled, circumferential motions of the cell wall synthesis machinery and MreB filaments in B. subtilis. Science. 2011;333:222–225. doi: 10.1126/science.1203285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Domínguez-Escobar J., Chastanet A., Crevenna A.H., Fromion V., Wedlich-Soldner R., Carballido-López R. Processive movement of MreB-associated cell wall biosynthetic complexes in bacteria. Science. 2011;333:225–228. doi: 10.1126/science.1203466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Muñoz-Espín D., Serrano-Heras G., Salas M. Role of host factors in bacteriophage phi29 DNA replication. Adv. Virus Res. 2012;82:351–383. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394621-8.00020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Muñoz-Espín D., Holguera I., Ballesteros-Plaza D., Carballido-López R., Salas M. Viral terminal protein directs early organization of phage DNA replication at the bacterial nucleoid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:16548–16553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010530107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Muñoz-Espín D., Daniel R., Kawai Y., Carballido-López R., Castilla-Llorente V., Errington J., Meijer W.J., Salas M. The actin-like MreB cytoskeleton organizes viral DNA replication in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009;106:13347–13352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906465106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Erb M.L., Kraemer J.A., Coker J.K., Chaikeeratisak V., Nonejuie P., Agard D.A., Pogliano J. A bacteriophage tubulin harnesses dynamic instability to center DNA in infected cells. eLife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.03197. doi:10.7554/eLife.03197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kraemer J.A., Erb M.L., Waddling C.A., Montabana E.A., Zehr E.A., Wang H., Nguyen K., Pham D.S., Agard D.A., Pogliano J. A phage tubulin assembles dynamic filaments by an atypical mechanism to center viral DNA within the host cell. Cell. 2012;149:1488–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Frunzke J., Bramkamp M., Schweitzer J.E., Bott M. Population heterogeneity in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 caused by prophage CGP3. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:5111–5119. doi: 10.1128/JB.00310-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kalinowski J., Bathe B., Bartels D., Bischoff N., Bott M., Burkovski A., Dusch N., Eggeling L., Eikmanns B.J., Gaigalat L., et al. The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins. J. Biotechnol. 2003;104:5–25. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(03)00154-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Smith G.A., Gross S.P., Enquist L.W. Herpesviruses use bidirectional fast-axonal transport to spread in sensory neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001;98:3466–3470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061029798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Taylor M.P., Koyuncu O.O., Enquist L.W. Subversion of the actin cytoskeleton during viral infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:427–439. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sambrook J., Fritsch E., Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kirchner O., Tauch A. Tools for genetic engineering in the amino acid-producing bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Biotechnol. 2002;104:287–299. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(03)00148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Eikmanns B.J., Thum-Schmitz N., Eggeling L., Lüdtke K.U., Sahm H. Nucleotide sequence, expression and transcriptional analysis of the Corynebacterium glutamicum gltA gene encoding citrate synthase. Microbiology. 1994;140:1817–1828. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-8-1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brazma A. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—successes, failures, challenges. ScientificWorld J. 2009;9:420–423. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2009.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Polen T., Wendisch V.F. Genomewide expression analysis in amino acid-producing bacteria using DNA microarrays. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004;118:215–232. doi: 10.1385/abab:118:1-3:215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Frunzke J., Gätgens C., Brocker M., Bott M. Control of heme homeostasis in Corynebacterium glutamicum by the two-component system HrrSA. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:1212–1221. doi: 10.1128/JB.01130-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heyer A., Gätgens C., Hentschel E., Kalinowski J., Bott M., Frunzke J. The two-component system ChrSA is crucial for haem tolerance and interferes with HrrSA in haem-dependent gene regulation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbiology. 2012;158:3020–3031. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.062638-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ingerman E., Perkins E.M., Marino M., Mears J.A., McCaffery J.M., Hinshaw J.E., Nunnari J. Dnm1 forms spirals that are structurally tailored to fit mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 2005;170:1021–1027. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200506078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Derman A.I., Becker E.C., Truong B.D., Fujioka A., Tucey T.M., Erb M.L., Patterson P.C., Pogliano J. Phylogenetic analysis identifies many uncharacterized actin-like proteins (Alps) in bacteria: regulated polymerization, dynamic instability and treadmilling in Alp7A. Mol. Microbiol. 2009;73:534–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06771.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bork P., Sander C., Valencia A. An ATPase domain common to prokaryotic cell cycle proteins, sugar kinases, actin, and hsp70 heat shock proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992;89:7290–7294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kabsch W., Mannherz H.G., Suck D., Pai E.F., Holmes K.C. Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex. Nature. 1990;347:37–44. doi: 10.1038/347037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Garner E.C., Campbell C.S., Mullins R.D. Dynamic instability in a DNA-segregating prokaryotic actin homolog. Science. 2004;306:1021–1025. doi: 10.1126/science.1101313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Salje J., Löwe J. Bacterial actin: architecture of the ParMRC plasmid DNA partitioning complex. EMBO J. 2008;27:2230–2238. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Polka J.K., Kollman J.M., Agard D.A., Mullins R.D. The structure and assembly dynamics of plasmid actin AlfA imply a novel mechanism of DNA segregation. J. Bacteriol. 2009;191:6219–6230. doi: 10.1128/JB.00676-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Derman A.I., Nonejuie P., Michel B.C., Truong B.D., Fujioka A., Erb M.L., Pogliano J. Alp7R regulates expression of the actin-like protein Alp7A in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:2715–2724. doi: 10.1128/JB.06550-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Daniel R.A., Errington J. Control of cell morphogenesis in bacteria: two distinct ways to make a rod-shaped cell. Cell. 2003;113:767–776. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00421-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.van den Ent F., Møller-Jensen J., Amos L.A., Gerdes K., Löwe J. F-actin-like filaments formed by plasmid segregation protein ParM. EMBO J. 2002;21:6935–6943. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cabeen M.T., Jacobs-Wagner C. The bacterial cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2010;44:365–392. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gayathri P., Fujii T., Namba K., Löwe J. Structure of the ParM filament at 8.5A resolution. J. Struct. Biol. 2013;184:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gayathri P., Fujii T., Møller-Jensen J., van den Ent F., Namba K., Löwe J. A bipolar spindle of antiparallel ParM filaments drives bacterial plasmid segregation. Science. 2012;338:1334–1337. doi: 10.1126/science.1229091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nanda A.M., Heyer A., Krämer C., Grunberger A., Kohlheyer D., Frunzke J. Analysis of SOS-induced spontaneous prophage induction in Corynebacterium glutamicum at the single-cell level. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:180–188. doi: 10.1128/JB.01018-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Firshein W., Kim P. Plasmid replication and partition in Escherichia coli: is the cell membrane the key? Mol. Microbiol. 1997;23:1–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2061569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Oliva M.A., Martin-Galiano A.J., Sakaguchi Y., Andreu J.M. Tubulin homolog TubZ in a phage-encoded partition system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012;109:7711–7716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121546109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Greber U.F., Way M. A superhighway to virus infection. Cell. 2006;124:741–754. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Villarreal L.P. Are viruses alive? Sci. Am. 2004;291:100–105. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1204-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.