Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2015 Jun 3;56(23):3503–3506. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.01.121

Toward the ABCD Core of the Calyciphylline A-Type Daphniphyllum Alkaloids: Solvent non-Innocence in Neutral Aminyl Radical Cyclizations

Jennifer L Stockdill 1, Alberto M Lopez 1, Ahmad A Ibrahim 1
PMCID: PMC4446722  NIHMSID: NIHMS664453  PMID: 26028785

Abstract

The Daphniphyllum alkaloids remain an attractive target in the synthetic community because of their unique framework and promising biological activities. We have shown that the ABC core of the calyciphylline A-type alkaloids can be rapidly accessed via the tandem cyclization of a neutral aminyl radical with a polarized cyclic olefin. Deuterium labeling experiments and reactions omitting a tin hydride reagent suggest that the solvent is the major source of the terminating hydrogen atom in the cyclization cascade. Incorporation of an internal alkyne in the radical pathway was tolerated in the reaction, and it provided the necessary atoms to enable completion of the D ring of the calyciphylline A-type alkaloids.


The Daphniphyllum alkaloids are a structurally diverse family of natural products native to evergreen trees and shrubs in Japan and China.1 Yagi and coworkers first reported these molecules in 1909,2 but their structures were not elucidated until decades later.3 Members of this family of alkaloids exhibit biological activities ranging from cytotoxicity to enhanced expression of nerve growth factor.1 Meanwhile, these compounds boast a unique framework of densely functionalized bridged and fused ring systems (Figure 1). The structural complexity and observed bioactivities of the Daphniphyllum alkaloids have inspired numerous efforts toward their synthesis.4,5,6

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative Daphniphyllum alkaloids.

We recently reported an efficient approach to the ABC core of the calyciphylline A and daphnicyclidin A-type alkaloids featuring a tandem radical cyclization initiated at nitrogen in only 4 steps and 61% overall yield from known lactone 1, which is accessible in 3 steps from (+)-carvone (Scheme 1).4 This strategy utilized a neutral dialkyl aminyl radical7 derived from chloroamine 2 to access tricyclic core 3.8 This cyclization was the first to employ a neutral aminyl radical in a cyclization with an enone, and represented one of two reported 6-exo cyclizations of aminyl radicals.7b,c Based on these results, we postulated that the olefin undergoing cyclization should be polarized to enable efficient reactions with neutral aminyl radicals.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Cyclization of a neutral dialkyl aminyl radical to access the ABC core.

During the course of our optimization of the cyclization of chloroamine 2, we noticed a significant decrease in the efficacy of cyclizations in benzene vs. toluene.4 Before investigating internally substituted alkynes, which might more readily facilitate construction of the D ring, we sought a better understanding of the role of the solvent in the cyclization. At lower temperatures, chlorine atom-transfer side products are observed, and the isolated yield of 3 is lower.4 Meanwhile, in benzene, increased amounts of reduction products are observed. We also observed products of addition to benzene itself. The potential for alkyl radicals to participate in chain-terminating addition reactions with arenes is well established.7b,9 The observed chain termination is due to the inability of cyclohexadienyl radicals to efficiently abstract a hydrogen atom from Bu3SnH,9 and it can be ameliorated by the addition of PhSeH or PhSeSePh.10 While this mode of reactivity is expected to be more problematic for benzene than toluene,9 we also considered that toluene might serve as an H-atom donor in the reaction, given its ability to generate a resonancestabilized benzylic radical (PhCH2•). This species would participate mainly in chain-terminating pathways, such as dimerization.9 The fact that our reaction performed best in the presence of 0.5 equiv AIBN was supportive of this possibility. High loadings of initiator generally indicate that the radical chain mechanism is either very short or is not propagated.9

Thus, we generated a working hypothesis for the cyclization mechanism to guide our further studies (Scheme 2). Upon thermolysis of AIBN and reaction with tributyltin hydride, the resultant stannyl radical would abstract a chlorine atom from the substrate (2, BDEN–Cl ≈ 67 kcal/mol) generating neutral dialkyl aminyl radical 4 and Bu3SnCl (BDESn–Cl ≈ 97 kcal/mol).11 Subsequent 6-exo-trig cyclization occurs with no observed [1,5]-H• transfer side reactions, generating tertiary radical 5. Upon 5-exo-dig cyclization with the pendant alkyne, a highly reactive vinylic radical (6) is generated.12 Finally, H• abstraction from either toluene (BDEC–H ≈ 88 kcal/mol)13 or Bu3SnH (BDESn–H ≈ 78 kcal/mol)11 affords the product (3). The resulting stannyl radical can propagate the radical chain whereas abstraction from the solvent would largely result in chain termination, as described above.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Working hypothesis for the major mechanistic pathway for the cyclization (BDEs from Refs 11 and 13).

To probe the last step of this mechanism, we subjected terminal alkyne 2 to d8-toluene and/or varying amounts of Bu3SnD (Table 1).14 In the absence of a D• source, a relative isotope distribution of ~100:15:1 is observed for 3 (entries 1 and 2), consistent with the calculated natural isotope abundance of the non-labeled substrate (100:14.7:1.2). When tributyltin deuteride is employed in the presence of toluene, the intensity of the 207 m/z and 208 m/z peaks increase, indicating a small amount of deuterium incorporation (entry 3). A larger amount of D is incorporated in the reaction employing Bu3SnH and d8-toluene (entry 4). As a control, both Bu3SnD and d8-toluene were employed. This adjustment resulted in a shift of the main isotope, as expected, but significantly lowered the yield (entry 5). Observation of a peak at 206 m/z was unexpected in this case, but it may arise from adventitious H-atom donors such as the C–H bond α to nitrogen in the substrate or product,15 the C–H bond α to Sn in Bu3SnD, or partially labeled solvent. Taken together, these results support a mechanism where the final H• transfer occurs more often through reaction of radical 6 with toluene than with Bu3SnH.

Table 1.

Deuterium incorporation studies supporting the hypothesis that toluene donates an H-atom during the cyclization.

graphic file with name nihms664453u1.jpg
entry solvent stannane (equiv) isolated yield (%) observed MS intensities (m/z)c
206 207 208
1 PhMe 9 100 15 1
2 PhMe Bu3Sn–H 2.0 74 100 15 1
3 PhMe Bu3Sn–D 2.0 66 100 32 5
4 d8PhMe Bu3Sn–H 2.0 46 100 93 15
5 d8PhMe Bu3Sn–D 2.0 26 17 100 17
6b PhMe Bu3Sn–D 2.0 54 100 51 7
7 PhMe Bu3Sn–D 4.0 39 100 54 8
a

A solution of AIBN and stannane (as relevant) was added dropwise to a heated solution of the substrate in solvent over 1 h, followed by stirring until 2 is fully consumed.

b

The reagents were added all at once at the beginning of the reaction.

c

Calculated m/z for C13H19NO: 205 (100.0%), 206(14.7%), 207(1.2%), for C13H18DNO: 206 (100.0%), 207 (14.7%), 208 (1.2%).

We expected that this competition could be adjusted by controlling the concentration of Bu3SnH in solution. We tested this hypothesis by conducting the reaction in the presence of Bu3SnD, without slow addition (entry 6). The yield decreases in this case, but the amount of D incorporation increases as compared with entry 3. Additionally, a slow addition of 4.0 equiv Bu3SnD, rather than 2.0 equiv, led to a similar result (entry 7). The increased D incorporation observed for these reactions was consistent with our expectations that increased solution concentrations of Bu3SnD would result in more D-atom transfer.

We were interested in probing the role of the solvent as a terminal H• donor further, so we considered the reaction of the substrate in the absence of any tin hydride. In this case, the isobutyronitrile radical (•CMe2CN) could either directly abstract a chlorine atom from 2, or it could abstract H• from solvent (H–CMe2CN BDEC–H ≈ 91 kcal/mol),11 likely leading to either Cl-atom abstraction16 or termination of the radical chain. This modification drastically alters the efficacy of the cyclization, resulting in only 9% isolated yield of the desired product and substantial amounts of unidentified by-products (Table 2, entry 1). Using o-xylene, which has a slightly lower BDEC–H (~87 kcal/mol),11 improves the yield to 30% (entry 2). In the case of ethylbenzene (BDEC–H ≈ 85 kcal/mol),11 the desired product is isolated in 42% yield (entry 3). Finally, when cumene (isopropylbenzene, BDEC–H ≈ 83–84 kcal/mol)11 is employed as the solvent, tricycle 3 is isolated in 49% yield (entry 4). These results serve as compelling evidence for the hypothesis that the solvent serves as an important H-atom donor in our cyclization reactions. Additionally, the extent to which the solvent participates in the reaction can be adjusted by tuning the BDE. In the case of entries 2–4, N–Cl reduction (i.e. abstraction of H• by radical 4) is observed via GCMS during the reaction. 17 The presence of this species increases (qualitatively) as the BDE decreases. This relationship is consistent with an N–H BDE near 88 kcal/mol.11 A larger energy gap between the N–H bond and the benzylic C–H bond correlates with increased formation of reduction products. No desired product (3) was isolated when the reaction was conducted in either benzene (80 °C) or trifluoromethylbenzene. In benzene, some chlorine atom transfer product was observed by LCMS.

Table 2.

Solvents with appropriate benzylic BDEs can serve as H-atom donors in the cyclization with no added stannane.

graphic file with name nihms664453u2.jpg
entry solvent BDE (kcal/mol) isolated yield (%)
1 Ph–Me 88 9
2 o-xylene 87 30
3 Ph–Et 85 42
4 Ph–(i-Pr) 83 49
a

AIBN was added at the start of the reaction, then the reaction was heated for 5 h.

H-atom donation from toluene and other solvents has been observed previously. The Curran group has proposed H-atom abstraction from cyclohexane.18 Sevéant and co-workers report H-atom transfer from acetonitrile and DMSO to a variety of aryl radical species with rate constants of ~108 − 109 M•s−1 and kH/kD values of 6–14.19 This large kinetic isotope effect is qualitatively consistent with our observations in Table 1. Slower D• transfer results in more side reactions of intermediate radical species, ultimately lowering the isolated yield of tricycle 3. The estimated rate constant for the reaction of Ph• with H–CH2Ph is 3 × 106 M•s−1.20 Taking Ph• as a model for the vinylic radical 6 provides a rough estimate of the rate of the final H• abstraction. Given the slow cyclization rates estimated by Newcomb and co-workers for neutral aminyl radicals (kc = 4 × 104 s−1 at 50 °C), as well as high relative rates for trapping with Bu3SnH vs. cyclization (kT/kc = 23 ± 2 at 50 °C),21 the competitive formation of reduction products in the tin-free reactions in Table 2 is unsurprising.

With these observations in hand, we focused our efforts toward the synthesis of daphniyunnine C (7),22 a calyciphylline A-type alkaloid (Scheme 3). We envisioned that an elaborated core structure containing the carbons needed to construct the D ring could be accessed using our cyclization reaction. Disconnection of the E and F rings of 7 revealed tetracyclic core 8, which could potentially be accessed through a variety of transformations employing pendant ketone 9. A potential masking group for this ketone is a 1,1-disubstituted olefin. Tricycle 10 could therefore serve as a viable intermediate in the synthesis of daphniyunnine C. Tricycle 10 would arise from a tandem intramolecular cyclization of a neutral aminyl radical generated from homolysis of the N–Cl bond in carvone derivative 11.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Strategies to access an elaborated ABC-core of the calyciphylline A-type Daphniphyllum alkaloids.

At this point, we turned our attention to the synthesis of alkynyl retron 11. We envisioned assembling chloroamine 11 as with propargyl substrate 2.4 Thus, we needed to generate propargyl amine derivative 15 (Scheme 4). N-Propargylphthalimide (12) and 1-chloro-2-methyl-propene (13) were joined via copper-mediated cross coupling, providing eneyne 14 in 96% yield. 23 Subsequent phthalimide cleavage provided free amine 15 in 76% yield.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of a propargylamine derivative incorporating a masked ketone moiety.

Reductive amination of lactol 1 with amine 15 provided secondary amine 16 in 54% yield (Scheme 5). Chlorination and oxidation were performed in a single reaction vessel to afford N-chloroenone 11 in up to 96% yield, depending on the reaction scale.24 Tandem radical cyclization under our previously optimized conditions afforded tricyclic amine 10 in 58% yield.25 In the absence of Bu3SnH, the product is isolated in 12% yield. The product is a 1:1 mixture of olefin isomers, as was expected owing to the rapid rate of inversion of vinylic radicals at high temperatures. 26

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Assembly of the ABC ring system bearing all carbon atoms needed for the D ring.

In summary, we have established that the solvent plays a major role in the outcome of our tandem cyclization of a neutral dialkylaminyl radical with a cyclic enone. In reactions where tributyltin hydride is present, both the stannane and the solvent serve as terminal H-atom donors for the cyclization cascade. However, because we observed greater incorporation of D in the presence of d8-toluene with Bu3SnH, it is likely that the solvent is the primary H-atom donor in our cyclizations. This conclusion is further corroborated by the ability to execute the reaction in the absence of any tin hydride source with yields inversely proportional to the benzylic C–H BDE. We have also established that internal alkynes are effective in the cyclization, and rapid inversion of the vinylic radical leads to a 1:1 ratio of olefin isomers. Efforts to elaborate this advanced intermediate to daphniyunnine C are ongoing.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Institutes of Health (R00-GM097095, R00-GM097095-S1) and Wayne State University for generous financial support. We also gratefully acknowledge the staff of the WSU Lumigen Instrument Center for spectroscopic support.

Footnotes

Supplementary materials

Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, IR, HRMS, and optical rotation) are provided for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge on the Internet.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kubota T, Kobayashi J. Nat Prod Rep. 2009;26:936–962. doi: 10.1039/b813006j. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yagi S. Kyoto Igaku Zassi. 1909;6:208–222. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yamamura S, Hirata Y. In: The Alkaloids. Manske RHF, editor. Vol. 60. Academic Press; New York: 1975. pp. 41–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ibrahim AA, Golonka AN, Lopez AM, Stockdill JL. Org Lett. 2014;16:1072–1075. doi: 10.1021/ol4034868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For a review of recent efforts toward the calyciphylline A-type alkaloids, see: Kang B, Jakubes P, Dixon DJ. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:550–562. doi: 10.1039/c3np70115h. and references therein.
  • 6.Efforts published since Ref 5, or toward other Daphniphyllum alkaloids, include: Wang L, Xu C, Chen L, Xiaojiang H, Wang DZ. Org Lett. 2014;16:1076–1079. doi: 10.1021/ol403609c.Williams DR, Mondal PK, Bawel SA, Nag PP. Org Lett. 2014;16:1956–1959. doi: 10.1021/ol5005092.Fang LC, Hsung RP. Org Lett. 2014;16:1826–1829. doi: 10.1021/ol500390a.Shvartsbart A, Smith AB. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:870–873. doi: 10.1021/ja411539w.Pangerl M, Höhlein I, Trauner D. Synlett. 2014;25:741–745.Li H, Qiu Y, Zhao C, Yuan Z, Xie X, She X. Chem Asian J. 2014;9:1274–1277. doi: 10.1002/asia.201400002.Kotha S, Ravikumar O. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:5582–5590.Fang L-C, Hsung RP. Org Lett. 2014;16:1826–1829. doi: 10.1021/ol500390a.Xiong X, Li Y, Lu Z, Wan M, Deng J, Wu S, Shao H, Li A. Chem Commun. 2014;50:5294–5297. doi: 10.1039/c3cc47873d.
  • 7.For information on prior cyclizations of neutral aminyl radicals, see: Zard SZ. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1603–1618. doi: 10.1039/b613443m.Musa OM, Horner JH, Shahin H, Newcomb M. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:3862–3868.Horner JH, Martinez FN, Musa OM, Newcomb M, Shahin HE. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:11124–11133.Bowman WR, Bridge CF, Brookes P. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 2000;1:1–14.Guindon Y, Guérin B, Landry SR. Org Lett. 2001;3:2293–2296. doi: 10.1021/ol0160809.Cassayre J, Gagosz F, Zard SZ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:1783–1785. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020517)41:10<1783::aid-anie1783>3.0.co;2-i.Prévost N, Shipman M. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:7165–7175.Banwell MG, Lupton DW. Heterocycles. 2006;68:71–92.Liu F, Liu K, Yuan X, Li C. J Org Chem. 2007;72:10231–10234. doi: 10.1021/jo7015967.Zhai H, Zlotorzynskya M, Sammis G. Chem Commun. 2009:5716–5718. doi: 10.1039/b914757h.Minozzi M, Nanni D, Spagnola P. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:7830–7840. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802710.and references therein; Zhai H, Wickenden JG, Sammis GM. Synlett. 2010:3035–3038.Zlotorzynska M, Zhai H, Sammis GM. J Org Chem. 2010;75:864–872. doi: 10.1021/jo902426z.Schwartz BD, Jones MT, Banwell MG, Cade IA. Org Lett. 2010;12:5210–5213. doi: 10.1021/ol102249q.White LV, Schwartz BD, Banwell MG, Willis AC. J Org Chem. 2011;76:6250–6257. doi: 10.1021/jo201005d.
  • 8.All reactions in this text are performed in the enantiomeric series relative to the natural product.
  • 9.For a helpful review, see: Litwinienko G, Beckwith ALJ, Ingold KU. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:2157–2163. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15007c.Levy M, Steinberg M, Szwarc M. J Am Chem Soc. 1954;76:3439–3441.Curran DP, Liu H. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:2127–2132.Curran DP, Yu H, Liu H. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:7343–7366.
  • 10.a) Crich D, Hwang JT. J Org Chem. 1998;63:2765–2770. doi: 10.1021/jo972197s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Crich D, Grant D, Krishnamurthy V, Patel M. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:453–463. doi: 10.1021/ar600020v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luo Y-R. Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds. CRC Press; New York: 2003. pp. 1–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beckwith ALJ, Schiesser CH. Tetrahedron. 1985;41:3925–3941. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ellison GB, Davico GE, Bierbaum VM, DePuy CH. Int J Mass Spec Ion Proc. 1996;156:109–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.See the Supporting Information for details.
  • 15.The mass of the corresponding imine is observed by LCMS of the crude reaction mixture.
  • 16.The quaternary benzyl ammonium salt is observed by LCMS of the crude reaction mixture, implying the existence of BnCl. graphic file with name nihms664453u3.jpg
  • 17.Reduction products are observed as a mixture of uncyclized and cyclized forms.graphic file with name nihms664453u4.jpg
  • 18.Curran DP, Chang CT. J Org Chem. 1989;54:3140–3157. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.M’Halla F, Pinson J, Savéant JM. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:4120–4127. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ingold KU. In: Free Radicals. Kochi JK, editor. Vol. 1. Wiley; New York: 1973. p. 77. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.a) Musa OM, Horner JH, Shahin H, Newcomb M. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:3862–3868. [Google Scholar]; b) Newcomb M, Horner JH, Shahin H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;35:5523–5526. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang H, Yang SP, Fan CQ, Ding J, Yue JM. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:553–557. doi: 10.1021/np050490e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Balducci E, Bellucci L, Petricci E, Taddei M, Tafi A. J Org Chem. 2009;74:1314–1321. doi: 10.1021/jo802463r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scales and isolated yields: 38 mg lactol, 64% yield; 109 mg lactol, 81% yield; 200 mg lactol, 96% yield.
  • 25.Average of 2 runs.
  • 26.a) Giese B. Angew Chem Int Ed, Engl. 1989;28:969–980. [Google Scholar]; b) Galli C, Guarnieri A, Koch H, Mencarelli P, Rappoport Z. J Org Chem. 1997;62:4072–4077. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES