Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 May 28;3(3):e00563-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00563-15

Complete Genome Sequence of Mycoplasma synoviae Strain WVU 1853T

Meghan A May a,, Gerald F Kutish b, Anthony F Barbet c, Dina L Michaels c, Daniel R Brown c,
PMCID: PMC4447919  PMID: 26021934

Abstract

A hybrid sequence assembly of the complete Mycoplasma synoviae type strain WVU 1853T genome was compared to that of strain MS53. The findings support prior conclusions about M. synoviae, based on the genome of that otherwise uncharacterized field strain, and provide the first evidence of epigenetic modifications in M. synoviae.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The genome of Mycoplasma synoviae type strain WVU 1853T has presented an assembly challenge, especially because of the many contiguous pseudogenes encoding alleles of its primary cytadhesin VlhA (1, 2). This most important virulence factor of M. synoviae is not represented in the genome survey of strain WVU 1853T (GenBank GCA_000385095.1). Illumina HiSeq paired-end (600× coverage) and PacBio single-molecule real-time (200× coverage) sequencing of DNA we extracted from first-passage specimens of ATCC 25204, lot 59130888, were performed by the Scripps Research Institute Sequencing Core and the University of Florida Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, respectively. Hybrid assembly was achieved in January 2015 by using a combination of Celera (3), Newbler (4), Ray (5), Sprai (http://zombie.cb.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sprai/index.html), and proovread (6) software, and then annotated via NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (7). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence similarities to the genome of M. synoviae field strain MS53 (8) were calculated using JSpecies version 1.2.1 (9) and AAI Calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/aai). Epigenetic modifications were analyzed using the PacBio RS_Modification_and_Motif_Analysis module version 2.2.0.

The closed circular genome is 846,495 bp in length, with 97% average nucleotide and 99% predicted amino acid identity to strain MS53. Its G+C content is 28.3 mol% versus the 34.2% estimated by buoyant density (10). The tetranucleotide frequency correlation with strain MS53 is 0.9985. Differences from strain MS53 include the presence of genes encoding type I restriction, modification, and specificity system subunits, and greater numbers of mobile element and hypothetical proteins. A single-nucleotide deletion in its clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated csn1 open reading frame (ORF) VY93_03200 likely accounts for the absence of a CRISPR array from this lineage of WVU 1853T; extensive strain-specific arrays occur in strain MS53 (8) and in M. synoviae strains K3344 and K5016 (our unpublished data). Its 78.5-kb vlhA locus, consisting of approximately 60 promoterless pseudogenes of varying lengths, is 33.7 mol% G+C and 14% longer than that of MS53. The expressed vlhA allele VY_01465 has at best 86% nucleotide similarity to others reported for different lineages of strain WVU 1853T but does encode the sialoreceptor binding motif PKVTFNLAAKEG (11). Modified bases consistent with methylation by N-6 adenine-specific DNA methylases clustered into four common (2,146 to 3,840 instances) and eight less common (7 to 313 instances) motifs distributed throughout the genome (modification quality scores, all > 30; P < 0.001). Between 84 and 88% of all instances of the most common motifs were methylated. Only 18 to 45% of all instances of six less common motifs were methylated, while the two least common motifs (7 and 37 instances) were 100% and 92% methylated, respectively. Additional m6A-modified bases and 742 putative instances of methylation by N-4 cytosine-specific DNA methylase (P < 0.001) were not clustered. Candidate DNA methylases involved included the predicted Dam methylases VY93_01015 and VY93_02585, Dcm methylase VY93_02380, the type I methylation subunit VY93_03755, and type III system subunits VY93_00870 and VY93_03705. These findings support prior conclusions about M. synoviae based on the genome of the otherwise uncharacterized strain MS53 and provide the first evidence of epigenetic modifications of the M. synoviae genome.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The M. synoviae WVU 1853T genome sequence and annotation data have been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP011096; the sequence described in this paper is the first version, CP011096.1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Robert M. Fisher Foundation (M.A.M.) and by a University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine Faculty Research Development Award (D.R.B.).

Footnotes

Citation May MA, Kutish GF, Barbet AF, Michaels DL, Brown DR. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Mycoplasma synoviae strain WVU 1853T. Genome Announc 3(3):e00563-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00563-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Noormohammadi AH, Markham PF, Kanci A, Whithear KG, Browning GF. 2000. A novel mechanism for control of antigenic variation in the haemagglutinin gene family of Mycoplasma synoviae. Mol Microbiol 35:911–923. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01766.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.May M, Brown DR. 2011. Diversity of expressed vlhA adhesin sequences and intermediate hemagglutination phenotypes in Mycoplasma synoviae. J Bacteriol 193:2116–2121. doi: 10.1128/JB.00022-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Myers EW, Sutton GG, Delcher AL, Dew IM, Fasulo DP, Flanigan MJ, Kravitz SA, Mobarry CM, Reinert KH, Remington KA, Anson EL, Bolanos RA, Chou HH, Jordan CM, Halpern AL, Lonardi S, Beasley EM, Brandon RC, Chen L, Dunn PJ, Lai Z, Liang Y, Nusskern DR, Zhan M, Zhang Q, Zheng X, Rubin GM, Adams MD, Venter JC. 2000. A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila. Science 287:2196–2204. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380. doi: 10.1038/nature03959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boisvert S, Raymond F, Godzaridis E, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2012. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol 13:R122. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-r122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hackl T, Hedrich R, Schultz J, Förster F. 2014. Proovread: large-scale high-accuracy PacBio correction through iterative short read consensus. Bioinformatics 30:3004–3011. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. In Beck J, Benson D, Coleman J, Hoeppner M, Johnson M, Maglott M, Mizrachi I, Morris R, Ostell J, Pruitt K, Rubinstein W, Sayers E, Sirotkin K, Tatusova T (ed), The NCBI handbook, 2nd ed. NCBI, Bethesda, MD: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vasconcelos AT, Ferreira HB, Bizarro CV, Bonatto SL, Carvalho MO, Pinto PM, Almeida DF, Almeida LG, Almeida R, Alves-Filho L, Assunção EN, Azevedo VA, Bogo MR, Brigido MM, Brocchi M, Burity HA, Camargo AA, Camargo SS, Carepo MS, Carraro DM, de Mattos Cascardo JC, Castro LA, Cavalcanti G, Chemale G, Collevatti RG, Cunha CW, Dallagiovanna B, Dambrós BP, Dellagostin OA, Falcão C, Fantinatti-Garboggini F, Felipe MSS, Fiorentin L, Franco GR, Freitas NSA, Frías D, Grangeiro TB, Grisard EC, Guimarães CT, Hungria M, Jardim SN, Krieger MA, Laurino JP, Lima LFA, Lopes MI, Loreto ELS, Madeira HMF, Manfio GP, Maranhão AQ, et al. . 2005. Swine and poultry pathogens: the complete genome sequences of two strains of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and a strain of Mycoplasma synoviae. J Bacteriol 187:5568–5577. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.16.5568-5577.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kelton WH, Mandel M. 1969. Deoxyribonucleic acid base compositions of Mycoplasma strains of avian origin. J Gen Microbiol 56:131–135. doi: 10.1099/00221287-56-2-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.May M, Dunne DW, Brown DR. 2014. A sialoreceptor binding motif in the Mycoplasma synoviae adhesin VlhA. PLoS One 9:e110360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES