Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2015 Feb 7;56(23):3604–3607. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.01.189

Synthesis of triarylmethanols via tandem arylation/oxidation of diarylmethanes

Jianyou Mao a,b, Kelly Eberle b, Jiadi Zhang b, Carles Rodriguez c, Zhenfeng Xi e,*, Miquel A Pericàs c,d,*, Patrick J Walsh b,*
PMCID: PMC4448728  NIHMSID: NIHMS661873  PMID: 26034337

Abstract

A tandem arylation/oxidation of diarylmethanes for the convenient synthesis of unsymmetrical triarylmethanols bearing different aryl and heteroaryl groups is described. A Pd(OAc)2–NiXantphos catalyst system efficiently catalyzed arylation of weakly acidic sp3-hybridized C–H bonds of diarylmethanes with aryl bromides, and the arylation products were then oxidized in situ to carbinols by simply opening the reaction flasks to air. The triarylmethanol products were obtained in 35–98% yield.

Keywords: Tandem reaction, Diarylmethanes, Synthesis, One pot, Aryl bromides

Introduction

Triarylmethanol derivatives are well-known substructures in natural products.1 They also find widespread applications in medicinal chemistry as antiproliferative agents,2 Ca2+-activated potassium ion channel blockers,3 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase inhibitors,4 anticancer agents,5 androgen receptor antagonists,6 HIV inhibitors,7 and HCV helicase inhibitors,8 among others.9 Traditional approaches toward the synthesis of unsymmetrical triarylmethanols bearing 3 different aryl groups involves nucleophilic addition of organolithium or Grignard reagents to benzophenone derivatives (Scheme 1).10 Despite the utility of this approach, these organometallic reagents have high reactivity and limited functional group tolerance, thus rendering their use less attractive.

Scheme 1. Synthetic Approaches to Unsymmetrical Triarylmethanols.

Scheme 1

Results and Discussion

We recently initiated a program in the catalytic functionalization of weakly acidic sp3-hybridized C–H bonds. The reactions involve initial reversible C–H deprotonation under basic conditions and subsequent functionalization of the deprotonated species under catalytic conditions. Based on these features, we categorize such reactions as deprotonative cross-coupling processes (DCCP). We reported DCCP of weakly acidic substrates including diarylmethanes (Scheme 2A), sulfoxides, sulfones, and amides.11-13 Diphenylmethane (pKa =32.314) and diarylmethane derivatives were arylated at room temperature with aryl bromides in the presence of KN(SiMe3)2 as base and a palladium catalyst bearing van Leeuwen’s NiXantphos ligand.15 We envisioned a tandem arylation/oxidation protocol toward the synthesis of triarylmethanols by first using our C–H arylation method to construct the C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond and then subsequent oxidation under air to forge the C(sp3)–O bond (Scheme 2B).

Scheme 2. Arylation of Diphenylmethane with Pd(NiXantphos)-based Catalyst and Tandem Arylation/Oxidation.

Scheme 2

A related tandem arylation/oxidation strategy was applied to a significantly more acidic substrate, N-methyloxindole (pKa=18.514) by Willis and co-workers (Scheme 3A as the sole example).16 During the course of our work, Shao and co-workers reported the tandem arylation/oxidation of fluorene (pKa=22.614) at 120° C in the presence of a Pd(NHC)-based catalyst in moderate to good yields (53–84%, Scheme 3B). They demonstrated the use of aryl chlorides as electrophiles with fluorene derivatives.17 Herein we report the successful tandem arylation/oxidation protocol to synthesize unsymmetrical triarylmethanols from weakly acidic diarylmethanes (pKa up to ~30) with aryl bromides at room temperature. Compared with traditional organometallic additions (Scheme 1A), the advantages of our method are: (1) atom-economy (C–C and C–O bond formations from 2 C–H bonds), (2) use of air as the oxidant, (3) room temperature reactions, (4) avoidance of storage or handling of organometallic reagents such as organolithium and Grignard reagents, and (5) commercial availability of diarylmethanes, aryl bromides, Pd source and the ligand.

Scheme 3. Tandem Arylation/Oxidations.

Scheme 3

We initially evaluated the reaction of 2-benzylpyridine (1a, pKa=28.214) with 1-bromo-4-tert-butylbenzene (2a) under the Pd-catalyzed reaction conditions related to our previous DCCP of aryl bromides.12a After completion of the DCCP by TLC (12 h), the reaction flask was opened to air at room temperature for 1 h or 3 h, providing the arylation/oxidation product in 60 and 75% yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Changing the limiting reagent from aryl bromide (2a) to 2-benzylpyridine (1a) (the best conditions for arylation of diarylmethane), resulted in a slight decrease in the yield (71%, entry 3). We noticed in entry 2 that 10% hydroperoxy byproduct was formed in the reaction along with the desired triarylmethanol. To reduce the peroxide to the desired alcohol, we examined PPh318 and NaI19 (entries 4 and 5) and found that the addition of 5 equiv NaI, followed by stirring at 100 °C for 10 min resulted in 86% yield of 3aa with only trace hydroperoxy byproduct. Changing the palladium loading to 2.5 mol% resulted in decreased yield (75%, entry 6). The optimized conditions in entry 5 were carried forward in the next phase, which focused on the determination of the scope of heterocycle containing diarylmethanes and aryl bromides in the tandem arylation/oxidation sequence to produce triarylmethanols.

Table 1.

Reaction Condition Screening a

graphic file with name nihms-661873-t0004.jpg

Entry la:2a Oxidation
condition
Reductant Yield(%)b
1 1.2:1.0 Air, lh none 60
2 1.2:1.0 Air, 3h none 75c
3 1.0:1.5 Air, 3h none 71c
4 1.2:1.0 Air, 3h PPh3d 34
5 1.2:1.0 Air, 3h Nal 86
6 1.2:1.0 Air, 3h Nal 75e
a

Reactions conducted on 0.1 mmol scale of (2a) at room temperature under nitrogen for 12 h and then the mixture was stirred under air for 3 h.

b

Yields determined by 1H NMR analysis of crude mixture with CH2Br2 as internal standard.

c

10% Hydroperoxide isolated.

d

Reaction at rt for 2 h after 2 equiv PPh3 was added.

e

2.5% catalyst.

The scope of the room temperature tandem arylation/oxidation with respect to aryl bromides was explored with isomeric 2-, 3-, and 4-benzylpyridine substrates (Table 2). 2-Benzylpyridine (1a) exhibited good reactivity under our conditions. Electron donating 4-tert-butyl bromobenzene (2a) reacted with (1a) to give 3aa in 83% isolated yield. 3-Bromobenzotrifluoride (2b) and 3-bromotoluene (2c) furnished tertiary aryl carbinols in 72 and 78% yield, respectively. In particular, 2-bromonaphthalene was an outstanding reagent, furnishing the product alcohol 3ad in 93% isolated yield. Sterically more demanding 1-bromonaphthalene was also tolerated, affording the product 3ae in 67% isolated yield. 4-Benzylpyridine (pKa=26.714) and 4-tert-butyl bromobenzene (2a) were coupled, furnishing the product 3ba in 67% isolated yield. N-Methyl-5-bromoindole (2f) was employed to give desired product 3bf in 54% yield. 3-Benzylpyridine (1d), with a pKa=30.1,14 was a challenging substrate. After significant optimization, an elevated oxidation temperature (100 °C) was found to provide the product 3da in only 35% yield. This substrate is the least acidic of those giving product, and represents the pKa limit for these conditions. Diphenylmethane underwent arylation only. No oxidation products were detected.

Table 2. Scope of Aryl Bromides in Tandem Arylation/Oxidation using Benzylpyridyl Speciesa.

graphic file with name nihms-661873-t0005.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-661873-t0006.jpg
a

Reactions conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1.2 equiv of 1, 1 equiv of 2 and 3 equiv of KN(SiMe3)2 at 0.1 M at 24 °C under nitrogen. After 12 h, the reaction mixture was opened to air for an additional 3 h. After oxidation, 5 equiv of NaI were added, then stirred at 100° C for 10 min. Isolated yield after chromatographic purification. b The ratio between 1a and 2e was 1.5: 1. c The arylation was conducted at 100 °C. c Oxidation at 100 °C for 3 h.

We then turned our attention to the substrate scope of aryl bromides with fluorene (1c) (Table 3). The parent bromobenzene (2g) reacted with (1c) to afford the triarylmethanol 3cg in 93% yield. Aryl bromides containing electron-donating groups, such as 4-tBu, 4-OMe, and 4-NMe2, exhibited good to excellent reactivity, affording the corresponding product in 96%, 73%, and 83% yield, respectively. Good yields (81– 82%) were obtained using aryl bromides bearing electron-withdrawing 4-chloro (3j) and 4-fluoro (3k) groups. Trifluoromethyl and methyl groups at meta position furnished 3cb and 3cc in 81% and 98% yield, respectively. 2-Bromonaphthalene participated in the tandem arylation/oxidation to produce the desired product in excellent yield (96%). Heterocyclic 5-bromo-1-methylindole (2f) was also tolerated in the reaction, furnishing the desired product in 95% yield. In general, we were pleased to find an average yield of 88% with fluorene as pronucleophile and a variety of aryl bromides. It is also noteworthy that the temperature employed in Table 2 is significantly lower than those used in Scheme 3B.17

Table 3. Scope of Aryl Bromides in Tandem Arylation/Oxidation using Fluorenea.

graphic file with name nihms-661873-t0007.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-661873-t0008.jpg
a

Reactions conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale. Isolated yield.

In summary, we have developed a one-pot tandem arylation/oxidation of diarylmethane derivatives for the convenient synthesis of triarylmethanols bearing different aryl and heteroaryl groups under mild reaction conditions. The synthesis was accomplished via a Pd(OAc)2–NiXantphos catalyzed C–H arylation of diarylmethanes with aryl bromides to construct the C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond, followed by subsequent oxidation under air to construct the C(sp3)–O bond (35–98% yield). Our method extends the reactivity to compounds that are 10 orders of magnitude less acidic than the procedure introduced by Willis and co-workers16a and provides a reliable low temperature method to access fluorene-containing triarylmethanols.

Given the well-established single-step transformations to convert trityl alcohols to the corresponding trityl cations as well as conversion of the trityl alcohols’ C–O–H into C–OR, C–S, C–N, C–halide (halide=F, Cl, etc.), C–alkyl, C–aryl, C–heteroaryl, and C–H’s, etc.,20 we envision the triarylmethanols obtained from our method will enable rapid access to a wide variety of trityl-containing derivatives.

Supplementary Material

  • We introduce a tandem catalytic arylation/oxidation with air as oxidant

  • NiXantPhos, a deprotonable ligand, is used with a palladium catalyst

  • This reaction is a deprotonative cross-coupling process (DCCP)

  • Triarylmethanols are efficiently synthesized

  • A carbo-alkoxylation is reported

Acknowledgments

Dedicated to the memory of Prof. Harry Wasserman for his countless years of service to chemistry. We thank the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS 104349) for financial support (PJW). J.M. thanks the China Scholarship Council [201306350151] for financial support.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at:

References and notes

  • 1.(a) Lanzetta R, Parrilli M, Adinolfi M, Aquila T, Corsaro MM. Tetrahedron. 1990;46:1287. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yagi A, Makino K, Nishioka I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1978;26:1111. doi: 10.1248/cpb.22.1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yenesew A, Dagne E, Müller M, Steglich W. Phytochemistry. 1994;37:525. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00704-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Adinolfi M, Corsaro MM, Lanzetta R, Parrilli M, Scopa A. Phytochemistry. 1989;28:284. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(93)85357-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Gill M. Aust. J. Chem. 1995;48:1. [Google Scholar]; (f) Alemayehu G, Hailu A, Abegaz BM. Phytochemistry. 1996;42:1423. [Google Scholar]; (g) Buchanan MS, Gill M, Yu J, Phonh-Axa S. Aust. J. Chem. 1999;52:875. [Google Scholar]; (h) Qhotsokoane-Lusunzi MA, Karuso P. J. Nat. Prod. 2001;64:1368. doi: 10.1021/np010279c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Qhotsokoane-Lusunzi MA, Karuso P. Aust. J. Chem. 2001;54:427. doi: 10.1021/np010279c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Hou Y, Cao S, Brodie PJ, Callmander MW, Ratovoson F, Rakotobe EA, Rasamison VE, Ratsimbason M, Alumasa JN, Roepe PD, Kingston DGI. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009;17:2871. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Carroll AR;, Nash BD, Duffy S, Avery VM. J. Nat. Prod. 2012;75:1206. doi: 10.1021/np300074z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l) Ducharme Y, Friesen RW, Blouin M, Cote B, Dube D, Ethier D, Frenette R, Laliberte F, Mancini JA, Masson P, Styhler A, Young RN, Girard Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003;13:1923. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(03)00314-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Qawasmeh RA, Lee Y, Cao M-Y, Gu X, Vassilakos A, Wright JA, Young A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:347. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zunszain PA, Shah MM, Miscony Z, Javadzadeh-Tabatabaie M, Haylett DG, Ganellin CR. Arch. Pharm. 2002;335:159. doi: 10.1002/1521-4184(200204)335:4<159::AID-ARDP159>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Said M, Battaglia E, Elass A, Cano V, Ziegler J-C, Cartier A, Livertoux M-H, Vergoten G, Fournel-Gigleux S, Magdalou J. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 1998;12:19. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0461(1998)12:1<19::aid-jbt4>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giri R, Goodell JR, Xing C, Benoit A, Kaur H, Hiasa H, Ferguson DM. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010;18:1456. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schrader TJ, Cooke GM. Toxicol. Lett. 2002;136:19. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00288-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cushman M, Kanamathareddy S, De Clercq E, Schols D, Goldman ME, Bowen JA. J. Med. Chem. 1991;34:337. doi: 10.1021/jm00105a053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen C-S, Chiou C-T, Chen GS, Chen S-C, Hu C-Y, Chi W-K, Chu Y-D, Hwang L-H, Chen P-J, Chen D-S, Liaw S-H, Chern J-W. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:2716. doi: 10.1021/jm8011905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Shah MM, Miscony Z, Javadzadeh-Tabatabaie M, Ganellin CR, Haylett DG. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001;132:889. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Brugnara C, Armsby CC, Sakamoto M, Rifai N, Alper SL, Platt O. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995;273:266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Early examples: Bockemüller W, Geier R. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1939;542:185. Dufraisse C, Velluz L. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1942;9:171. Lepage Y. Ann. Chim. Paris [13] 1959;4:1137. Mehta NB, Strelitz JZ. J. Org. Chem. 1962;27:4412. Cava MP, Lee WS. Tetrahedron. 1968;24:837.
  • 11.(a) McGrew GI, Temaismithi J, Carroll PJ, Walsh PJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:5541. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) McGrew GI, Stanciu C, Zhang J, Carroll PJ, Dreher SD, Walsh PJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:11510. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang J, Stanciu C, Wang B, Hussain MM, Da C-S, Carroll PJ, Dreher SD, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:20552. doi: 10.1021/ja208935u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Zhang J, Bellomo A, Creamer AD, Dreher SD, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:13765. doi: 10.1021/ja3047816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bellomo A, Zhang J, Trongsiriwat N, Walsh PJ. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:849. [Google Scholar]; (c) Sha S-C, Zhang J, Carroll PJ, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:17602. doi: 10.1021/ja409511n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Jia T, Bellomo A, EL Baina K, Dreher SD, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:3740. doi: 10.1021/ja4009776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zheng B, Jia T, Walsh PJ. Org. Lett. 2013;15:1690. doi: 10.1021/ol400472v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zheng B, Jia T, Walsh PJ. Org. Lett. 2013;15:4190. doi: 10.1021/ol4019002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Montel S, Jia T, Walsh PJ. Org. Lett. 2014;16:130. doi: 10.1021/ol403124g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bordwell FG. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988;21:456. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van der Veen LA, Keeven PH, Schoemaker GC, Reek JNH, Kamer PCJ, van Leeuwen PWNM, Lutz M, Spek AL. Organometallics. 2000;19:872. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Durbin MJ, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2008;10:1413. doi: 10.1021/ol800141t. Examples of benzylic arylation with aryl halides/oxidation to synthesize ketones: Xie Y, Yang Y, Huang L, Zhang X, Zhang Y. Org. Lett. 2012;14:1238. doi: 10.1021/ol300037p. Zhao D, Zhu M-X, Wang Y, Shen Q, Li J-X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013;11:6246. doi: 10.1039/c3ob41488d.
  • 17.Ji Y-Y, Lu L-L, Shi Y-C, Shao L-X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014;12:8488. doi: 10.1039/c4ob01594k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.a) Carless HAJ, Batten RJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982;23:4735. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nishinaga A, Iwasaki H, Shimizu T, Toyoda Y, Matsuura T. J. Org. Chem. 1986;51:2257. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) (a) Fukuzumi S, Okamoto K, Gros CP, Guilard R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:10441. doi: 10.1021/ja048403c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mair RD, Graupner AJ. Anal. Chem. 1964;36:194. [Google Scholar]; (b) Skinner KJ, Hochster HS, McBride JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974;96:4301. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shchepinov MS, Korshun VA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003;32:170. doi: 10.1039/b008900l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES