Abstract
β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) agonists (β2-agonist) are the most commonly used therapy for acute relief in asthma, but chronic use of these bronchodilators paradoxically exacerbates airway hyper-responsiveness. Activation of βARs by β-agonist leads to desensitization (inactivation) by phosphorylation through G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) which mediate β-arrestin binding and βAR internalization. Resensitization occurs by dephosphorylation of the endosomal βARs which recycle back to the plasma membrane as agonist-ready receptors. To determine whether the loss in β-agonist response in asthma is due to altered βAR desensitization and/or resensitization, we used primary human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) isolated from the lungs of non-asthmatic and fatal-asthmatic subjects. Asthmatic HASMCs have diminished adenylyl cyclase activity and cAMP response to β-agonist as compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs. Confocal microscopy showed significant accumulation of phosphorylated β2ARs in asthmatic HASMCs. Systematic analysis of desensitization components including GRKs and β-arrestin showed no appreciable differences between asthmatic and non-asthmatic HASMCs. However, asthmatic HASMC showed significant increase in PI3Kγ activity and was associated with reduction in PP2A activity. Since reduction in PP2A activity could alter receptor resensitization, endosomal fractions were isolated to assess the agonist ready β2ARs as a measure of resensitization. Despite significant accumulation of β2ARs in the endosomes of asthmatic HASMCs, endosomal β2ARs cannot robustly activate adenylyl cyclase. Furthermore, endosomes from asthmatic HASMCs are associated with significant increase in PI3Kγ and reduced PP2A activity that inhibits β2AR resensitization. Our study shows that resensitization, a process considered to be a homeostasis maintaining passive process is inhibited in asthmatic HASMCs contributing to β2AR dysfunction which may underlie asthma pathophysiology and loss in asthma control.
Introduction
β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) is a proto-typical member of a large family of seven transmembrane cell surface receptors termed G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) [1,2] [3]. βAR consists of β1, β2 and β3 subtypes, of which β2AR is widely distributed in the respiratory tract and the most well studied in asthma [4–8]. β2AR-agonist (β2-agonist) binding evokes coupling of β2ARs to G-protein releasing Gs and Gβγ subunits. Gs-G protein activates adenylyl cyclase (AC) generating cAMP which in turn activates protein kinase A (PKA) that phosphorylates downstream targets mediating relaxation [9,10]. Dissociated Gβγ subunits recruit G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) that phosphorylates β2ARs resulting in β-arrestin binding [11–13] desensitizing the receptors. β-arrestin targets β2ARs to undergo internalization but dissociates from β2AR complex prior to internalization [14]. β2ARs are resensitized by dephosphorylation through protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in the early endosomes before recycling to the plasma membrane as agonist ready receptors [15].
Although β2AR desensitization has been comprehensively studied, less is known about resensitization. Dephosphorylation of β2ARs by PP2A is a pre-requisite step in resensitization [2,16] and considered to be a passive homeostasis maintaining process. Contrary to this belief, our recent studies have shown that β2AR resensitization is tightly governed by regulation of PP2A [15,17]. PP2A is a serine-threonine phosphatase containing catalytic, scaffolding and regulatory subunits [18,19] which can be regulated by endogenously occurring inhibitor proteins called the inhibitor of PP2A, I1- and I2-PP2A [19,20]. We have shown that phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ (PI3Kγ) phosphorylates I2PP2A resulting in enhanced I2PP2A binding to PP2A inhibiting PP2A activity [17]. Inhibition of PP2A activity at the β2AR complex induces loss in resensitization due to incapability of PP2A in dephosphorylating receptors. In this context, whether altered resensitization contributes to β2AR dysfunction in pathology remains unknown.
β2AR dysfunction occurs in various pathological conditions [1,9] including asthma [21]. β2-agonist is commonly used for acute rescue of asthma as a bronchodilator [1,22] which mediates relaxation of airway smooth muscle (ASM) via the cAMP-PKA pathway [12]. Despite β2-agonist mediating acute relief in airway obstruction, chronic usage of β2-agonist evokes tachyphylaxis and a rebound in airway hyper-responsiveness [23]. In addition, the short and long- acting β2 agonists interact with β2 receptors differentially altering the relaxation and duration of bronchodilation in asthmatic patients. Moreover, genetic polymorphisms of β2 have been reported to alter the response of the β2-AR receptors to β2-agonist [8]. Dataset analysis from multiple clinical trials show that around 70% of asthma patients on β2-agonist lose the β2-agonist-induced broncho-protection [24,25] and yet, the underlying causes remain unknown. We postulate that β2AR dysfunction may contribute to the asthma diathesis and the alterations in desensitization and/or resensitization may underlie the asthma pathophysiology. While the mechanisms of β2AR desensitization are well characterized [1], less is known about β2AR resensitization in general and nothing in human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMCs). To address whether changes in desensitization/resensitization underlies β2AR dysfunction in asthma, we characterized β2AR function in HASMCs derived from non-asthmatic and fatal asthmatic subjects to provide insights into pathways altered in human airways.
Methods
Human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) cultures
Primary HASMCs were isolated from the lungs of de-identified donors with fatal asthma and non-asthma, phenotyped and were used in their 3rd— 5th passages for the experiments as previously described [26]. Although information concerning the cause of death, gender, race and age of the donor is available including medical history describing no communicable disease, there are no unique identifiers that can link the subject’s identification to the tissue sample. Cells were received at their first passage from Dr. Panettieri’s lab (non-asthma cell lines N051912/1, N090712/1, N 101412/1, N010912/1, N061212/1, N082112/1, N012412/1 & N120511/1; asthma cells lines AS010513/1, AS011813/1, AS110112/1, AS110412/1, AS 110612/1, AS091511/1, AS101411/1 & AS113011/1). The cells were expanded and serum starved for 12 hours prior to treatments.
Limitations and advantages of using primary human airway smooth muscles for the study
In the current studies, we have used primary human airway smooth muscle cells derived from patient lungs. A caveat and a limitation of primary culture studies is the selective amplification of sturdy cells in the isolated population from the lungs. However, this limitation is outweighed by advantages like a) that the cells are directly derived from the asthmatic lungs providing a platform to probe for alterations in the pathways underlying asthma pathology and b) that these may be the most receptive cells that may respond to treatment in pathology. Therefore, pathways identified in these cells will have significant translational impact.
Ethics statement
Although our studies have utilized primary human airway smooth muscle cells, these have been derived from anonymous patient donors. The adult human tissue is provided by the National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI) and the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine (IIAM) according to the procedures approved by the University of Pennsylvania Committee on Studies Involving Human Beings. As such, the human tissue is exempt from requiring IRB approval as the use of this tissue is not considered human studies by the University of Pennsylvania Committee on Studies Involving Human Beings.
Purification of plasma membrane and early endosomes
Purification of plasma membrane and endosomes were performed as described previously [17] [27]. Briefly, cells were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 5mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, and 2 μg/mL Leupeptin & Aprotinin respectively. Cell debris/nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 1000 X g for 5 minutes at 4°C. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube and subjected to centrifugation at 37, 000 X g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The pellet containing plasma membrane was re-suspended in 75 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, and 12.5 mM MgCl2 while, the supernatant underwent one more round of centrifugation at 200, 000 X g for 1 hour at 4°C. The pellet containing the endosomes was recovered by re-suspension in 75 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, and 12.5 mM MgCl2.
βAR density, adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity and cAMP
βAR density was determined by incubating 20 μg of the membranes (plasma membranes or endosomes) with saturating concentrations of [125I]-cyanopindolol (250 pmol/L) alone or along with 40 μM Alprenolol for non-specific binding as described previously [28,29]. AC assays were carried out by incubating 20 μg of membranes (isolated plasma membranes or endosomes) at 37°C for 15 minutes with labeled α[32]P-ATP as previously described [30,31]. ISO was used instead of albuterol in the plasma membranes/endosomal resensitization experiments because ISO is a full agonist which allows for higher G-protein coupling resulting in measurable levels of in vitro cAMP generation especially in the endosomal fractions. The cAMP content was determined in the cytosol using catch point cAMP kit (Molecular Devices; Sunnyvale, CA) as per manufacturer’s instruction [29].
Phosphatase assay
Phosphatase activity was measured using the serine/threonine phosphatase kit (Upstate Biotechnology) as previously described [29]. Briefly, PP2A was immunoprecipitated and the immunoprecipitates were re-suspended in the phosphate-free assay buffer. The immunoprecipitated PP2A was incubated with phospho-serine/threonine hexa-peptide substrate specific for PP2A to assess for the loss in phosphorylation. The reaction was terminated by adding acidic malachite green solution and absorbance was measured at 630 nm in a plate reader (SpectraMax Plus 384, Molecular Devices).
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting and detection of proteins were carried out as previously described [29]. Cells were harvested in NP40 lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 20% Glycerol, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Sodium Orthovanadate, 2μg /ml Leupeptin and Aprotinin. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 12000 X g for 15 min at 4°C and the supernatants used for immunoprecipitation. Similarly, plasma membrane and endosomal fractions were re-suspended in the NP40 lysis buffer and processed for immunoprecipitation. PP2A was immunoprecipitated using anti-PP2A antibody (1:100) (Upstate Biotechnology), PI3Kα, β, δ and γ were immunoprecipitated using anti-PI3Kα (1:100), anti-PI3Kβ (1:100), anti-PI3Kδ (1:100) and anti-PI3Kγ (1:100) antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C with lysates and protein A/G agarose beads and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to assays or western immunoblotting. Immuno-precipitates were washed and resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (BIO-RAD) for western immunoblotting analysis. The membranes were blocked with 5% milk or 5% BSA and incubated with antibodies recognizing phospho-S-355/356-β2AR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:1000 dilution, GRK, 2, 3, 5 and 6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:1000 dilution, β-Arrestin (BD biosciences, San Jose, California, 1: 300), PI3Kα and γ at 1:1000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or I2-PP2A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:1000 dilution. Following primary antibody incubation, appropriate secondary antibody (1:3000) was used and detection was carried out using enhanced chemiluminescence. Quantitative densitometric analysis was carried out using the NIH image J software.
Confocal microscopy
Confocal microscopy was performed as previously described [29]. Non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs were plated on poly L-Lysine treated cover slips. The cover slips containing non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs without any treatment were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton-X 100 and incubated in 1% BSA in 1 X PBS for 1 hour. After washing three times in 1 X PBS, the cover slips were incubated with anti-phospho serine (355/356) S-355/356-β2AR antibody (1:500; SantaCruz Biotechnology) in 1% BSA in 1 X PBS for 1hour. Following three washes with 1 X PBS, the cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with AlexaFlour 488 (1:500; Molecular probes, Eugene, OR) for 1hour. The cells were washed in 1 X PBS, fixed with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, CA) and β2AR phosphorylation visualized by sequential line excitation at 488 for green, with the correct emission filters. In each experiment, 100 to 120 positive cells were analyzed and the experiments were repeated with four different non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs.
Lipid kinase assay
Lipid kinase assays were performed on immunoprecipitated proteins as previously described [32]. PI3Kα, β, δ and γ were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates, plasma membranes or endosomes of non-asthmatic or asthmatic HASMCs and the immunoprecipitates were washed with buffers as described previously [33] and resuspended in 50 μl of reaction assay buffer containing 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 100 μM sodium-orthovanadate, 100 μM MgCl2, and 10 μl of 2 mg/ml phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) (20 μg) sonicated in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4 and 1 mM EDTA). Reactions were started by adding 10 μl of 440 μM ATP and 10 μCi [32P]Pγ-ATP and incubated at 23°C for 10 minutes with continuous agitation on a thermal mixer. The reaction was stopped with 20 μl 6N HCl and lipids were extracted by adding 160 μl of chloroform:methanol (1:1). After centrifugation, 30 μl of the organic phase was spotted onto 200 μm silica-coated TLC plates (Selecto-flexible; Fischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) that were pre-coated with 1% potassium oxalate. The lipids were resolved using thin layer chromatography with 2N glacial acetic acid:1-propanol (1:1.87). The plates were dried, exposed, and lipid phosphorylation visualized using autoradiography.
Statistics
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test for two samples comparison and for multiple comparisons, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Post-hoc analysis was performed with a Scheffe test. For analysis, a value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Asthmatic HASMCs manifest β2AR dysfunction
To test whether asthmatic ASM is characterized by β2AR dysfunction, non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs were challenged with albuterol (β-agonist) acutely (0, 5, 10 and 20 minutes) and cAMP generation assessed as a measure of βAR function. Sustained cAMP generation in asthmatic HASMCs in response to albuterol was not as robust as non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 1a) suggesting βAR dysfunction. To test whether βAR dysfunction in asthmatic ASM is due to loss in G-protein coupling, non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs were treated with albuterol (0, 5, 10 or 20 minutes). Following treatment, plasma membranes were isolated and re-challenged with albuterol to determine adenylyl cyclase (AC) activation. Significant albuterol-stimulated cell free AC activity was observed in the plasma membranes from non-asthmatic HASMCs without albuterol pre-treatment followed by progressive reduction in AC activity with increasing albuterol pre-treatment (5, 10 or 20 minutes) (Fig 1b). In contrast, AC activity was markedly reduced in asthmatic HASMCs following albuterol (5, 10 or 20 minutes) compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs. These observations show that βARs in asthmatic HASMCs are pre-disposed to dysfunction due to their reduced G-protein coupling capability following agonist activation which is exacerbated even with shorter duration of β-agonist treatment.
Augmented β2AR phosphorylation and loss of cell surface receptors in asthmatic HASMCs
Since βAR dysfunction is observed in asthmatic HASMCs, state of β2AR phosphorylation was assessed as an underlying cause for reduced receptor function. Non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs were plated on cover slips and baseline β2AR phosphorylation determined by confocal microscopy using anti-phospho-β2AR antibody. Marked β2AR phosphorylation (green) was visualized in asthmatic HASMCs compared to non-asthmatic (Fig 2a) indicating that increased phosphorylation in part, may underlie a βAR defect in asthma HASM. Since significant β2AR phosphorylation was observed in asthmatic HASMCs, we assessed βAR density by radio-ligand binding. Plasma membranes from asthmatic HASMCs had significantly lower βAR density compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 2b) consistent with the paradigm that receptor phosphorylation is a trigger for β2AR internalization. These data suggests higher endosomal accumulation of phosphorylated β2ARs in asthmatic HASMCs. Thus, in addition to loss in G-protein-AC coupling, lower cell surface receptor density may also contribute towards reduced cAMP generation in the ensuing β2AR dysfunction (Fig 1).
Molecules regulating β2AR desensitization remain unchanged in asthma HASMCs
Increased β2AR phosphorylation is classically associated with increased desensitization mediated by up-regulation of GRK2 [30,34]. To test whether increased β2AR phosphorylation in asthmatic HASMCs is associated with changes in molecules regulating desensitization, lysates from asthmatic and non-asthmatic HASMCs were immunoblotted for the ubiquitously expressed GRKs, GRK 2, 3, 5 and 6 [35,36]. Despite significant β2AR phosphorylation, no differences in expression of GKR 2, 3, 5 or 6 were observed between non-asthmatic and asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 2c). Additionally, no differences in β-arrestin expression was observed (Fig 2c) suggesting that desensitization mechanisms may not account for increased phosphorylation of β2ARs in asthmatic HASMCs.
PI3K activation in asthmatic HASMCs
Absence of alterations in desensitization molecules suggests that β2AR dysfunction in asthmatic HASMCs could be due to changes in resensitization which is regulated by PI3Kγ [29]. However, little is known about PI3K isoforms or their activity in HASMs. Therefore, activity of PI3Kα, β, δ and γ isoforms were determined by immunoprecipitating PI3Kα, β, δ and γ from non-asthmatic HASMCs and assayed for lipid kinase activity. Significant PI3Kα, δ and γ activity was observed compared to PI3Kβ suggesting that PI3Kα, δ and γ isoforms (S1a and S1c Fig) may play a critical role in HASM PI3K signaling. To test whether PI3Kα or γ is activated by albuterol treatment, non-asthmatic HASMCs were subjected to albuterol treatment and assessed for activation. Albuterol treatment activated PI3Kγ while minimal changes were observed with PI3Kα (S1b Fig). To determine whether PI3K activity is altered in asthma, PI3Kα, δ or γ were immunoprecipitated from asthmatic and non-asthmatic HASMCs. PI3Kα and γ activity was significantly higher in asthmatic HASMCs compared to non-asthmatic (Fig 3a and 3b) with no appreciable difference in PI3Kδ activity (S1c Fig). Interestingly, PI3Kγ was markedly higher in asthmatic HASMCs compared to PI3Kα (Fig 3a and 3b). As PI3Kγ is activated by Gβγ-subunits of G-proteins [37,38], we assessed whether muscuranic receptor agonists activate PI3Kγ. In contrast to albuterol, carbachol (a muscarinic receptor agonist) did not activate PI3Kγ (S1d Fig). However, carbachol still activated downstream extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) (assessed by phospho-ERK (pERK)) (S1e Fig) suggesting dissociation of PI3Kγ activation from muscuranic receptor-mediated downstream signaling.
Asthmatic HASMCs are characterized by significant loss in PP2A activity
As phosphatase activity of PP2A mediates dephosphorylation and resensitization of β2ARs, PP2A was investigated to test whether changes in PP2A activity may underlie β2AR dysfunction in asthmatic HASMCs. Significant reduction in PP2A activity was observed in the PP2A immunoprecipitates from asthmatic HASMCs compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs suggesting that alterations in dephosphorylation mechanisms may underlie β2AR dysfunction (Fig 3c). However, immunoblotting showed no appreciable differences in expression of PP2A in asthmatic versus non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 3d, upper panel) indicating mechanisms of regulating PP2A function as a cause for loss in activity. Since the regulatory B subunit of PP2A does not play a role in activity but only in its localization [18], we assessed for the known endogenous regulator of the PP2A activity, inhibitor of PP2A—I2PP2A [20]. Interestingly, we observed no discernible differences in I2-PP2A expression between the asthmatic and non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 3d, lower panel) suggesting that changes in PP2A activity are not dependent on expression but might involve PI3Kγ-mediated phosphorylation of I2PP2A, that may then bind to PP2A inhibiting PP2A activity [29].
Reduced β2AR resensitization in the endosomes of asthma HASMCs
β2AR dephosphorylation and resensitization occurs in the endosomes [2] and a recent study in HEK 293 cells showed that the dephosphorylated β2AR can be activated in the recycling endosomes [29]. To harness this observation within the context of resensitization, we established methods to biochemically measure β2AR resensitization in the HASMCs by isolating plasma membranes and endosomes, and subjecting them to β2AR functional coupling assays (Fig 4a). Consistent with our previous observation (Fig 2b), plasma membrane fraction from asthmatic HASMCs had significantly lower βAR density (Fig 4b). In contrast, endosomal fraction from asthmatic HASMCs had significantly higher βAR density compared to the non-asthmatics HASMCs (Fig 4b) suggesting that asthmatic HASMCs are characterized by endosomal accumulation of βARs. Importantly, total βAR density (sum of plasma membrane and endosomal fraction) was similar in asthmatic and non-asthmatic HASMCs (Supplementary Fig 1f) suggesting that receptor numbers may not be a critical determinant of asthma phenotype.
To determine the functional capability of these βARs to couple G-protein and adenylyl cyclase (AC), plasma membrane and endosomal fraction were assessed for isoproterenol (ISO)-stimulated cell-free AC activity. ISO was used instead of albuterol because ISO is a full agonist which may allow for higher G-protein coupling resulting in measurable levels of in vitro cAMP generation especially in the endosomal fractions. Corresponding to our previous data (Fig 1b), plasma membrane AC activity was less robust in asthmatic HASMCs compared to non-asthmatic (Fig 4c). Interestingly, significant adenylyl cyclase activity was observed in the endosomes from non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 4c) which was markedly abolished in asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 4c) showing that endosomal βARs in the asthmatic HASMCs are unable to couple G-proteins. Since state of βAR phosphorylation is a critical determinant of β-agonist response, β2AR phosphorylation was assessed in the plasma membranes and endosomes. Significant β2AR phosphorylation was observed in the endosomal fraction (E) from the non-asthmatic HASMCs compared to minor β2AR phosphorylation at the plasma membranes (P) (Fig 4d). Remarkably, significant β2AR phosphorylation was observed both at the plasma membrane (P) as well as in the endosome (E) from the asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 4d). These data suggest that increased receptor phosphorylation underlies the reduced β2AR responses to agonist challenge. Therefore, we assessed whether inhibition of resensitization could be a cause for accumulation of phosphorylated β2ARs by assaying for PI3Kγ and PP2A activity. PI3Kγ activity was observed in the plasma membrane (P) fraction from both asthmatic and non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 5a). In contrast, endosomal (E) fraction from asthmatic HASMCs had significantly higher PI3Kγ activity compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 5a) suggesting that increased endosomal PI3Kγ activity may attenuate βAR resensitization/dephosphorylation by inhibiting PP2A. To test whether elevated PI3Kγ is associated with reduction of PP2A activity, PP2A activity was assayed from plasma membranes and endosomes. Significant loss in PP2A activity was observed on the plasma membranes as well as endosomes in the asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 5b) compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 5b) suggesting that reduction in phosphatase activity and loss in resensitization may underlie βAR dysfunction in asthma HASM.
Discussion
β-agonist remains the most commonly used reversal therapy in acute asthma [9,10] and yet, accumulating evidence shows loss in β2AR-mediated broncho-protection. β2AR signaling in ASM is key for maintaining the bronchomotor tone and relaxation [23]. In our current study, we identified that asthmatic HASMCs have significant β2AR dysfunction compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs and may underlie the airway hyper-responsive phenotype in asthma. Critically, our studies show that the β2AR dysfunction in asthmatic HASMCs is not due to enhanced desensitization but reduced resensitization. Reduced resensitization is characterized by diminished dephosphorylation of β2ARs due to decreased endosomal PP2A activity that underlies the accumulation of the phosphorylated β2ARs in asthmatic HASMCs. Consistent with increased phosphorylation, endosomal βARs are unable to couple G-proteins to activate AC in HASMCs from fatal asthma patients. In contrast, endosomal βARs from non-asthmatic HASMCs couple to G-protein and activate AC indicating robust dephosphorylation of receptors in the endosomes thus, increasing the availability of agonist-ready βARs. Corresponding to accumulation of phosphorylated βARs in endosomes, asthmatic HASMCs have reduced endosomal PP2A activity and increased PI3Kγ activity that may contribute to βAR dysfunction by inhibiting resensitization (Fig 5c).
Airway tone and responsiveness is thought to be regulated by contraction and relaxation mediated by muscarinic and β2ARs respectively [9,39]. In ASM cells, the muscarinic receptor couples to inhibitory G-protein-Gi reducing cAMP levels evoking contraction which is reversed by β2AR coupling to stimulatory G-protein-Gs resulting in cAMP generation and relaxation [12]. Despite this intricate balance, alterations in these pathways are known to underlie the airway hyper-responsive phenotype in asthma [10]. Studies show that enhanced contractile tone of the airways is robustly inhibited by muscarinic receptor antagonist [40]. Conversely, β2-agonist i.e., long-acting β-agonist, has proved effective in ameliorating airway hyper-responsiveness to acute asthma symptoms [9,41]. However, chronic β2-agonist use evokes loss of asthma control as nearly 70% of severe asthma patients fail to broncho-protect with β-agonist [24,25,42], but it is not known whether the loss is due to altered desensitization or resensitization. In this context, recent study in mouse airway smooth muscle has shown the presence of both β1AR as well as β2ARs [47]. Nevertheless, overwhelming number of studies including those in the HASMCs has shown that β2AR is the key player [49, 50]. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that regulate β2AR function is critical and our studies show that in asthmatic HASMCs resensitization pathways may be altered contributing to receptor dysfunction. In addition to the alterations in resensitization mechanisms, chronic β-agonist treatment in asthma patients could lead to alterations in the β2AR signaling pathways that may also contribute to loss in asthma control. Interestingly, studies have shown elevated phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) in asthmatic HASMCs which could also accelerate the catalysis of cAMP [45] and contribute to loss in β2AR response. Similarly, PI3Kγ activation in the asthmatic HASMCs (Fig 3a & 3b) could also be a part of the altered β2AR downstream response inhibiting β2AR signaling as a feed-back mechanism. Thus, loss of β2ARs from cells surface, elevated PDE activity [45] and increased PI3Kγ activity in asthmatic HASMCs together could contribute towards significant reduction in robust β-agonist response and may underlie the exacerbation observed with chronic use of β-agonist.
Studies in various cells including non-asthmatic HASMCs have shown that β-agonist induces acute β2AR desensitization upon GRK-mediated phosphorylation associated with β-arrestin recruitment [1, 12] that reduces G-protein coupling [23]. Though β2AR dysfunction is known to occur in variety of diseases [16], it has been attributed to desensitization [36] mechanisms due to associated upregulation of GRK2-mediated phosphorylation [34, 48]. However, our studies show that β2AR dysfunction in asthma may be due to changes in resensitization mechanisms owing to reduced dephosphorylation rather than enhanced phosphorylation. This suggests that resensitization as a process could be as important as desensitization in determining β2AR functional outcome. Consistent with our observation of altered resensitization, asthmatic HASMCs have no appreciable upregulation of GRK 2, 3, 5 or 6 (the most ubiquitously expressed GRKs [43]). Furthermore, β-arrestin is also not altered in asthmatic HASMCs compared to the non-asthmatic suggesting that proximal molecules initiating β2AR desensitization are not altered. This observation may in part, explain the immediate beneficial effects observed with β-agonist in acute asthma events [10] while chronic use results in subsequent loss of this benefit [9]. This suggests a delicate dynamic balance which could be altered due to changes in downstream β2AR pathways including PI3Kγ activation in response to chronic β-agonist treatment.
Despite little change in proximal desensitizing molecules, asthmatic HASMCs are characterized by accumulation of β2ARs in the endosomes, an observation consistent with previous studies in asthma lungs [7]. Thus, chronic agonist treatment in asthma may promote progressive reduction in available β2ARs for agonist activation with endosomal accumulation, a characteristic biochemical phenotype in asthmatic HASMCs. Correspondingly, acute agonist stimulation of the asthmatic HASMCs results in markedly lower cAMP generation even over short time periods (20 minutes). The decrease in cAMP generation and subsequent reduction in adenylyl cyclase activity to acute agonist stimulation in asthmatic HASMCs is reflected by the reduced number of β2ARs available for agonist activation. Such a phenomenon explains the rebound in airway hyper-responsiveness following chronic β2-agonist treatment [44] suggesting that passive accumulation of β2ARs in the endosomes may underlie the asthma phenotype.
Loss in β-agonist response associated with minimal changes in desensitization machinery and significant accumulation of phosphorylated β2ARs in the endosomes of asthmatic HASMCs points to impaired resensitization in asthma etiology. In contrast to well the understood desensitization [17], little is known about resensitization. Resensitization has long been considered a passive homeostasis maintaining process wherein, phosphorylated β2ARs are dephosphorylated in the endosomes and recycled back as naïve receptors ready for agonist activation [1]. Due to this traditionally held paradigm, the idea that changes in the pace of dephosphorylation could alter the rate at which resensitization occurs has never been interrogated. Our study shows that reduction/inhibition of resensitization in asthmatic HASMCs promotes accumulation of phosphorylated β2ARs in the endosomes suggesting that resensitization could be dysregulated/impaired in pathology. Cellular studies have shown that PP2A that dephosphorylates βARs is negatively regulated by PI3Kγ [29]. Correspondingly our studies in asthmatic HASMCs show significant activation of PI3Kγ associated with marked reduction in PP2A activity. These observations show that the mechanisms regulating resensitization pathways are markedly impaired and may contribute to the asthma phenotype. In this context, impaired PP2A activity leads to a shift in the balance towards accumulation of phosphorylated β2ARs in the endosomes without altering the rate of desensitization. Consistent with this idea, we observe accumulation of βARs in the endosomes of asthmatic HASMCs as phosphorylated βARs undergo dephosphorylation in the endosomes [29].
Resensitization per se till now has always been described within the frame work of desensitization. Therefore, to test directly whether resensitization is altered, we employed the classical receptor activation assays but on endosomal fractions in light of the recent study in HEK 293 cells showing that β2ARs in recycling endosomes can be activated by agonist [2,46]. We sought to take advantage of this observation by performing cell free βAR stimulated adenylyl cyclase activation assays as a measure of resensitization in the endosomes. Since resensitization (dephosphorylation of receptors) is known to occur in the endosomes, significant PP2A activity in the endosomes of non-asthmatic HASMCs would lead to concomitant βAR dephosphorylation resulting in generation of agonist ready receptors. In contrast, inhibition of resensitization would lead to reduced PP2A activity and impaired dephosphorylation resulting in accumulation of phosphorylated βARs in the endosomes. Consistently, endosomal fractions from asthmatic HASMCs have significantly lower agonist ready receptors as measured by adenylyl cyclase activity compared to non-asthmatic HASMCs. Additionally, the endosomes from asthmatic HASMCs had marked reduction in PP2A activity associated with increased PI3Kγ mechanistically supporting the idea that elevated PI3Kγ inhibits PP2A in the endosomes impairing resensitization. Impaired resensitization consequently leads to accumulation of βARs in the endosomes as observed in asthmatic HASMCs. Thus, our findings show that resensitization of βAR is altered in the human airway smooth muscle cells in severe asthma accounting for the rebound in airway hyper-responsiveness and ironic loss in response to β-agonist treatment.
These studies suggest a paradigm shift that β2AR resensitization considered passive and homeostasis maintaining, could be dysregulated to actively evoke disease pathogenesis. These findings are very important as it suggests that resensitization which has been overlooked up until now could be an integral contributing factor in pathology. Our data shows that changes in resensitization results in βAR dysfunction, that in part could evoke airway hyper-responsiveness. Further studies on the molecular mechanisms regulating β2AR resensitization will provide key insights into developing therapeutic strategies to target βAR resensitization in asthma [41]. Finally, our study provides an understanding on why acute β-agonist treatment is beneficial in asthma while, chronic treatment paradoxically does not provide the expected relief in asthma.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
All data are contained within the paper and supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Molecular Cardiology start-up funds & HL089473 (SVNP); HL115008 (SVNP & SE); HL081064, HL103453 (SE); P01-HL114471 & P30-ES013508 (RAP), http://www.nih.gov. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Rockman HA, Koch WJ, Lefkowitz RJ (2002) Seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors and heart function. Nature 415: 206–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Krueger KM, Daaka Y, Pitcher JA, Lefkowitz RJ (1997) The role of sequestration in G protein-coupled receptor resensitization. Regulation of beta2-adrenergic receptor dephosphorylation by vesicular acidification. J Biol Chem 272: 5–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Heitzler D, Crepieux P, Poupon A, Clement F, Fages F, et al. (2009) Towards a systems biology approach of-G protein-coupled receptor signalling: challenges and expectations. C R Biol 332: 947–957. 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shenoy SK, Rockman HA (2011) Cardiovascular biology: heart fails without pump partner. Nature 477: 546–547. 10.1038/477546a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bond RA, Spina D (2011) Special issue of BJP on respiratory pharmacology. Br J Pharmacol 163: 1–3. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01239.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Loza MJ, Penn RB (2010) Regulation of T cells in airway disease by beta-agonist. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2: 969–979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Walker JK, Penn RB, Hanania NA, Dickey BF, Bond RA (2011) New perspectives regarding beta(2)-adrenoceptor ligands in the treatment of asthma. Br J Pharmacol 163: 18–28. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01178.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Johnson M (2006) Molecular mechanisms of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor function, response, and regulation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 117: 18–24; quiz 25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Shore SA, Drazen JM (2003) Beta-agonists and asthma: too much of a good thing? J Clin Invest 112: 495–497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shore SA, Moore PE (2003) Regulation of beta-adrenergic responses in airway smooth muscle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 137: 179–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kong KC, Gandhi U, Martin TJ, Anz CB, Yan H, et al. (2008) Endogenous Gs-coupled receptors in smooth muscle exhibit differential susceptibility to GRK2/3-mediated desensitization. Biochemistry 47: 9279–9288. 10.1021/bi801056w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Penn RB, Benovic JL (2008) Regulation of heterotrimeric G protein signaling in airway smooth muscle. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5: 47–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Turki J, Liggett SB (1995) Receptor-specific functional properties of beta 2-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies in asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 12: 531–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ (2002) The role of beta-arrestins in the termination and transduction of G-protein-coupled receptor signals. J Cell Sci 115: 455–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Vasudevan NT, Mohan ML, Gupta MK, Hussain AK, Naga Prasad SV (2011) Inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A activity by PI3Kgamma regulates beta-adrenergic receptor function. Mol Cell 41: 636–648. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ferguson SS (2001) Evolving concepts in G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis: the role in receptor desensitization and signaling. Pharmacol Rev 53: 1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Vasudevan NT, Mohan ML, Goswami SK, Naga Prasad SV (2011) Regulation of beta-adrenergic receptor function: an emphasis on receptor resensitization. Cell Cycle 10: 3684–3691. 10.4161/cc.10.21.18042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sontag E (2001) Protein phosphatase 2A: the Trojan Horse of cellular signaling. Cell Signal 13: 7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Virshup DM, Shenolikar S (2009) From promiscuity to precision: protein phosphatases get a makeover. Mol Cell 33: 537–545. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Li M, Damuni Z (1998) I1PP2A and I2PP2A. Two potent protein phosphatase 2A-specific inhibitor proteins. Methods Mol Biol 93: 59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Penn RB (2009) Agonizing over agonism: should asthmatics turn their beta-receptors on or off? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2095–2096. 10.1073/pnas.0812935106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lin R, Degan S, Theriot BS, Fischer BM, Strachan RT, et al. (2012) Chronic treatment in vivo with beta-adrenoceptor agonists induces dysfunction of airway beta(2)-adrenoceptors and exacerbates lung inflammation in mice. Br J Pharmacol 165: 2365–2377. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01725.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Penn RB, Panettieri RA Jr., Benovic JL (1998) Mechanisms of acute desensitization of the beta2AR-adenylyl cyclase pathway in human airway smooth muscle. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 19: 338–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Salpeter SR, Buckley NS, Ormiston TM, Salpeter EE (2006) Meta-analysis: effect of long-acting beta-agonists on severe asthma exacerbations and asthma-related deaths. Ann Intern Med 144: 904–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Salpeter SR, Ormiston TM, Salpeter EE (2004) Meta-analysis: respiratory tolerance to regular beta2-agonist use in patients with asthma. Ann Intern Med 140: 802–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Morgan SJ, Deshpande DA, Tiegs BC, Misior AM, Yan H, et al. (2014) Beta-agonist-mediated relaxation of airway smooth muscle is PKA-dependent. J Biol Chem. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Perrino C, Naga Prasad SV, Schroder JN, Hata JA, Milano C, et al. (2005) Restoration of beta-adrenergic receptor signaling and contractile function in heart failure by disruption of the betaARK1/phosphoinositide 3-kinase complex. Circulation 111: 2579–2587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Naga Prasad SV, Barak LS, Rapacciuolo A, Caron MG, Rockman HA (2001) Agonist-dependent recruitment of phosphoinositide 3-kinase to the membrane by beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1. A role in receptor sequestration. J Biol Chem 276: 18953–18959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Vasudevan NT, Mohan ML, Gupta MK, Hussain AK, Naga Prasad SV (2011) Inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A activity by PI3Kgamma regulates beta-adrenergic receptor function. Mol Cell 41: 636–648. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Choi DJ, Koch WJ, Hunter JJ, Rockman HA (1997) Mechanism of beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization in cardiac hypertrophy is increased beta-adrenergic receptor kinase. J Biol Chem 272: 17223–17229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nienaber JJ, Tachibana H, Naga Prasad SV, Esposito G, Wu D, et al. (2003) Inhibition of receptor-localized PI3K preserves cardiac beta-adrenergic receptor function and ameliorates pressure overload heart failure. J Clin Invest 112: 1067–1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Naga Prasad SV, Jayatilleke A, Madamanchi A, Rockman HA (2005) Protein kinase activity of phosphoinositide 3-kinase regulates beta-adrenergic receptor endocytosis. Nat Cell Biol 7: 785–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Naga Prasad SV, Esposito G, Mao L, Koch WJ, Rockman HA (2000) Gbetagamma-dependent phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation in hearts with in vivo pressure overload hypertrophy. J Biol Chem 275: 4693–4698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Iaccarino G, Barbato E, Cipolletta E, De Amicis V, Margulies KB, et al. (2005) Elevated myocardial and lymphocyte GRK2 expression and activity in human heart failure. Eur Heart J 26: 1752–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hata JA, Koch WJ (2003) Phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors: GPCR kinases in heart disease. Mol Interv 3: 264–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Huang ZM, Gold JI, Koch WJ (2011) G protein-coupled receptor kinases in normal and failing myocardium. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 16: 3047–3060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lopez-Ilasaca M, Gutkind JS, Wetzker R (1998) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma is a mediator of Gbetagamma-dependent Jun kinase activation. J Biol Chem 273: 2505–2508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Stoyanova S, Bulgarelli-Leva G, Kirsch C, Hanck T, Klinger R, et al. (1997) Lipid kinase and protein kinase activities of G-protein-coupled phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma: structure-activity analysis and interactions with wortmannin. Biochem J 324 (Pt 2): 489–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Penn RB, Bond RA, Walker JK (2014) GPCRs and arrestins in airways: implications for asthma. Handb Exp Pharmacol 219: 387–403. 10.1007/978-3-642-41199-1_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Moulton BC, Fryer AD (2011) Muscarinic receptor antagonists, from folklore to pharmacology; finding drugs that actually work in asthma and COPD. Br J Pharmacol 163: 44–52. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01190.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Deshpande DA, Penn RB (2006) Targeting G protein-coupled receptor signaling in asthma. Cell Signal 18: 2105–2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Barnes PJ (2010) New therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Princ Pract 19: 330–338. 10.1159/000316368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Penn RB, Pascual RM, Kim YM, Mundell SJ, Krymskaya VP, et al. (2001) Arrestin specificity for G protein-coupled receptors in human airway smooth muscle. J Biol Chem 276: 32648–32656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lin R, Peng H, Nguyen LP, Dudekula NB, Shardonofsky F, et al. (2008) Changes in beta 2-adrenoceptor and other signaling proteins produced by chronic administration of 'beta-blockers' in a murine asthma model. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 21: 115–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Trian T, Burgess JK, Niimi K, Moir LM, Ge Q, et al. (2011) beta2-Agonist induced cAMP is decreased in asthmatic airway smooth muscle due to increased PDE4D. PloS one 6: e20000 10.1371/journal.pone.0020000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Irannejad R, Tomshine JC, Tomshine JR, Chevalier M, Mahoney JP, et al. (2013) Conformational biosensors reveal GPCR signalling from endosomes. Nature 495: 534–538. 10.1038/nature12000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hegde A, Strachan RT, Walker JKL (2015) Quantification of beta adrenerigic receptor subtypes in beta-arrestin knockout mouse airways. PloS One 10: e0116458 10.1371/journal.pone.0116458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mak JC, Hisada T, Salmon M, Barnes PJ, Chung KF (2002) Glucocorticoids reverse IL-1beta-induced impairment of beta-adrenoceptor-mediated relaxation and up-regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases. Br. J. Pharmacol. 135: 987–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Despande DA, Penn RB (2006) Targeting G-protein coupled receptor signaling in asthma. Cell Signal 18: 2105–2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Despande DA, Theriot BS, Penn RB, Walker JKL (2008) β-arrestins specifically constrain b2-adrenergic receptor signaling and function in airway smooth muscle. FASEB J 22: 2134–2141. 10.1096/fj.07-102459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the paper and supporting information files.