Abstract
Understanding of molecular events associated with tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer (PC) is an active area of research especially because of the rich desmoplasia seen in human PC. Desmoplasia is contributed by several cell types including cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) and stellate cells (PSCs), which are believed to play critical roles in conferring aggressiveness to PC. The aberrant expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in PSCs and CAF cells appears to play a pivotal role in the development and progression of PC. In this study, expression analysis of miR-21/miR-221 in conditioned media derived from PSCs/CAF cells, and from PSCs/CAF cells showed up-regulation of both miRNAs compared to MIAPaCa-2 PC cells. In addition, miR-21 expression in stellate cells derived from normal pancreas was substantially lower when compared to PSCs or CAF cells. COLO-357 PC cells cultured in the presence of conditioned media derived from PSC/CAF cells led to a significant increase in clonogenicity and pancreatosphere formation. Furthermore, inhibition of miR-21 with antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) transfection resulted in decreased migration/invasive capacity of PSCs. Similarly, the effect of ASO-miR-221 transfection in CAF cells reduced the expression of NF-κB and K-Ras (target of miR-221) along with inhibition of migration/invasion. Moreover, miRNA expression profiling of PSCs, MIAPaCa-2, and COLO-357 cells, and further validation by real-time PCR, showed several differentially expressed miRNAs, among which four was significantly up-regulated. Collectively, these results suggest a crosstalk between PSCs/CAF cells and PC cells, resulting in the up-regulation of miR-21/miR-221 expression which in part may confer aggressiveness to PC. We conclude that targeting these miRNAs could be useful for developing precision medicine for the prevention of tumor progression and/or for the treatment of PC.
Keywords: Stellate cells, CAF cells, exosomes, miRNA, pancreatic cancer
Introduction
Although substantial progress has been made over the past decades in understanding the biology of human pancreatic cancer (PC) and therapeutics, it still remains the fourth leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States [1]. PC patients continue to exhibit incurable and/or chemo-resistant tumors with a median survival period of less than 6 months. Many targeted therapies and novel combinations of drugs have prolonged life, but only by a few weeks [2]. Recent studies in PC have led to the acceptance of the role of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) cells in defining aggressiveness of PC [3,4]. Other studies have reported a facilitatory role for stromal components such as cancer-associated stellate cells (PSCs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) in tumor progression, metastasis and chemoresistance in PC [5,6]. In addition, the staining of PC tissue sections with activation marker α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) has revealed the presence of PSCs, now established as the main source of collagen in the desmoplastic reaction surrounding cancer cells. Notably, PSCs have been shown to stimulate pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration, resulting in increased local tumor growth as well as distant metastasis [7]. The CAF is derived from heterogeneous population of cells type that contribute to many of the equivalent functions of activated stellate cells having activation of α-SMA and myofibroblast-like phenotype and are equally responsible for desmoplastic reaction [8]. Moreover, Scarlett et al demonstrated that circulating bone marrow derived stem cells (BMDC) can merge into pancreas and contribute significantly to the activated PSCs both in pancreatitis and PC suggesting that BMDC may play an important role in promoting carcinogenesis [9]. Although many in vitro studies demonstrated significant sensitivities to chemotherapy to several solid tumors, chemo-sensitivity to PC is dismal which suggest the presence of an exceptional tumor microenvironment [10]. Emerging evidence suggests that hypoxia, a cancer driver which confers aggressiveness to PC [11], also causes activation of PSCs to their myofibroblast-like phenotype with consequent increase in the synthesis and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in the stroma [5].
Mounting evidence suggests that the deregulated expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) plays a pivotal role in the progression of various types of diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer [3,12,13]. MicroRNAs are stable, small non-coding RNAs with thousands of predicted mRNA targets, and they play a diverse role in numerous cellular processes including tumor cell proliferation and invasion, and thus can serve as early diagnostic markers in many cancers including PC [14-18]. A recent study in a murine model of chronic pancreatitis suggested that the interaction between cellular and exosomal expression of miR-21 and connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) in activated PSCs leads to the up-regulation of miR-21 and CCN2 expression via a positive feedback loop [19]. Another study revealed that isolated PSCs from pancreas tissue of male rats showed deregulation of several known miRNAs including miR-221, miR-143 and miR-146a between day 1 quiescent PSCs and day 14 activated PSCs, targeting pathways such as p38 mitogen-activated and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase [20]. The down-regulation of miR-15b and miR-16 was inversely correlated with their target gene Bcl-2, while reinstating their expression decreased Bcl-2 expression and induced apoptosis of activated rat PSCs [21]. The activation of PSCs was not only observed in animal model but also in human PSCs co-cultured with PC cells, which showed altered expression of several miRNAs including miR-210. Inhibition of miR-210 in PSCs resulted in decreased cell migration of PC cells accompanied by increased expression of EMT markers such as vimentin and snail, suggesting an interaction between PSCs and PC cells [22], all of which could be important in the biology of tumor microen vironment.
In the present study, we compared the expression level of miR-21/miR-221 in the human PC cell line MIAPaCa-2 and normal stellate cells (nhPSCs) with that in cancer associated stellate cells (PSCs) and fibroblast (CAF) cells, as well as in conditioned media. Furthermore, PC cells cultured with and without conditioned media from PSCs and CAF were assessed for colony formation and the formation of pancreatospheres. In addition, the putative roles of miR-21 and miR-221 expression were studied by inhibiting the expression of miR-21 in PSCs and miR-221 in CAFs using antisense oligonucleotide transfection. We found that inhibition of miR-21 and miR-221 expression led to decreased invasion and migration of PSCs and CAF cells respectively. Moreover, miRNA microarray profiling of PC cells and PSCs/CAF cells revealed several dysregulated miRNAs, of which four were significantly up-regulated in PSCs/CAF cells compared to the pancreatic cancer cell lines MIAPaCa-2 and COLO-357 cells, which was chosen based on our experience working with these cells. These results suggest that the activation of PSCs is likely to be regulated by miRNAs, which in turn may play a significant role in PC progression through deregulation of tumor microenvironment.
Materials and methods
Cells culture
Human normal and cancer associated stellate cells were generated by Professor Minoti Apte and her collaborators, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia and were grown in IMDM containing 20% FBS and antibiotics. Human cancer associated fibroblast cells CAF-19 were a gift from Dr. Anirban Maitra from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD and were grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS as described previously by the same group [23,24]. Human PC cell lines COLO-357 and MIAPaCa-2 were maintained and grown as described earlier and were chosen for this study. Cell lines were tested and authenticated as described earlier [17].
RNA isolation from cells
RNA from human PSCs, CAF, and PC cell lines was isolated using the Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlbad, CA) method according to the manufacturer’s protocol and as described earlier [17].
RNA isolation from cell culture media
RNA from culture media obtained from human PSCs, CAF, and PC cell lines were isolated using ExoMir Kit (BI00 Scientific Corporation, Austin, TX) following manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly about 10 ml of conditioned media was centrifuged @ 2000 x g for 10 min and was passed slowly through the syringe fitted with the filter provided in the kit. The captured particles on the filter were then attached to 1 ml syringe containing BI00Pure-MP (provided in the kit) and were slowly depressed to recover lysate into the micro centrifuge tube. 200 μl of chloroform was mixed with lysate and centrifuged to separate layers. 3 μl of co-precipitant provided with the kit was added to the aqueous layer before the addition of isopropanol, vortexed and stored at -20°C to precipitate RNA. After centrifugation at maximum speed 17,000 x g, the pellet was washed with 75% ethanol and resuspended in 50 μl of resuspension solution provided with the kit. RNA concentration was measured and its quality was evaluated by the absorption ratio at 260/280 nm using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The RNA was then used for quantitative real-time PCR as described below.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of miRNA
To examine basal expression of miR-21 and miR-221 in human PSCs, CAF, PC cells and conditioned media, TaqMan microRNA Assay kit was used (Applied Biosystems) per manufacturer’s protocol. 10 ng of RNA from each sample were reverse transcribed as described earlier [17]. All reactions were performed in triplicate using StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems). Relative expressions of miRNAs were analyzed using Ct method and were normalized by RNU48 expression.
Immunostaining and confocal imaging microscopy
The expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in MIAPaCa-2, CAF, and PSCs was assessed by immunostaining. 1000 cells were plated in a 4-chamber culture glass slide and cultured till 50% confluent. The cells were then washed, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution and permeabilized with 0.05% Tween 20 solution. After blocking the cells with 1% BSA for 30 min at room temperature, they were incubated with α-SMA (Abcam) primary antibody for 1 h followed by 30 min with secondary antibody. Nuclear staining was performed with DAPI solution (Invitrogen). The antibody-labeled cells were photographed using confocal Imaging Microscope with 40X magnification (EVOS Imaging System, Life Technologies).
In vitro co-culture experiments
Interactions between PC cells (COLO-357 cells) and cancer associated PSCs and CAFs were studied by exposing cancer cells for 72 h to conditioned media derived from both PSCs and CAF-19 cells, and this co-culturing was continued for additional six days for assessing optimal effects. PC cells cultured without conditioned media served as controls. Clonogenic and pancreatosphere formation assays were performed as detailed below.
Clonogenic assay of co-cultured cells
After incubation with and without conditioned medium for 72 hours as described above, PC cells were trypsinized and 1000 viable cells were plated in 100 mm petri dishes. Cells were then incubated in a 5% CO2/5% O2/90% N2 incubator for about 10-12 days at 37°C. The colonies formed were stained with 2% crystal violet and photographed.
Pancreatosphere formation assay
After incubation with and without conditioned medium for 72 hours as described above, PC cells were trypsinized and 1000 viable single cells were plated in the ultralow attached 6 well plate with 2 ml of sphere formation media and were incubated for about a week. The spheres formed termed as “pancreatospheres” were harvested by centrifugation (300 X g) for 5 minutes and were counted under a converted microscope and were also photographed.
Anti-sense miR-21 oligonucleotide transfection
All PSCs (200,000/well) isolated from three different patients were plated in 6 well plates and incubated for about a week. The cells were then transfected twice with ASO-miR-21 or control ASO-miRNA (Life Technology) using DharmaFECT transfection reagent (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and as described previously [17]. After 72 h of transfection, inhibition of miR-21 expression was assessed by qRT-PCR (as described above). In addition, migration and invasion of PSCs was measured by chamber cell invasion assay as discussed below.
Invasion assay
Chamber Cell invasion assay was conducted using the 24-well transwell permeable support system (Corning, Lowell, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 50,000 cells transfected with control ASO-miRNA and ASO-miR-21 were plated in a serum-free medium in the upper chamber coated with matrigel. The lower chamber was filled with complete media and cells were incubated for 24 h. The cells in the upper chamber were then removed and the matrigel-invading cells were stained with Calcein AM (Invitrogen) for one hour. The fluorescently labeled cells were photographed using a fluorescence microscope. Fluorescence of the invading cells was measured at excitation/emission wavelengths of 405/535 nm using a Microplate Reader (Tecan, Durham, NC).
Migration assay
Similar to the invasion assay, migration assay was conducted using the 24-well transwell permeable support system (Corning, Lowell, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 50,000 transfected cells with control ASO-miRNA and ASO-miR-21 were plated in serum-free medium in the upper chamber (no matrigel coating), and the lower chamber was filled with complete media and was incubated for 24 h. The cells in the upper chamber were removed and the migrated cells were stained with Calcein AM (Invitrogen) for one hour. Fluorescently labeled cells were photographed and fluorescence measured as described above.
Anti-sense miR-221 oligonucleotide transfection
Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF-19) were plated at a seeding density of 200,000 cells per well in a 6 well plate and incubated for 72 h. The cells were transfected ASO-miR-221 or control ASO-miRNA (Life Technology) using DharmaFECT transfection reagent (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and as described previously [17]. After 72 h of transfection, these cells were transfected again for two more rounds and RNA was extracted for assessing of the expression of miR-221 qRT-PCR, and cell migration and invasion was measured as described above. Transfected cells were also harvested for mRNA expression by qRT-PCR and protein expression by western blot analysis.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of mRNA
To examine basal expression of K-Ras and NF-κB in human CAF-19 cells transfected with control ASO-miRNA and ASO-miR-221, RNA was isolated as described above. 1 μg of RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed using a High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA assay kit (Applied BioSystems) per manufacturer’s protocol. All PCR reactions were performed in triplicate with SYBR Green PCR master mix using StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR (Applied BioSystems). Relative expressions of mRNAs were analyzed using Ct method and were normalized by GAPDH expression.
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted from CAF-19 cells, transfected with control ASO-miRNA and ASO-miR-221 and subjected to western blot analysis as described previously to assess K-Ras and NF-κB expression [17]. The data was normalized against β-actin expression.
MicroRNA profiling
Total RNA was isolated from human PC cell lines and PSCs using a miRNeasy Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified RNA samples from all cell lines were analyzed by LC Sciences for miRNA microarray profiling, utilizing miRBase version 20 (LC Sciences Houston, Tx). Data were normalized using selected housekeeping genes.
Statistical methods
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Paired Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was assumed at a p value of < 0.05.
Results
Expression of miR-21 was up-regulated in cancer associated stellate cells compared to PC cells
Since miR-21 has proven to be an oncogenic miRNA in many solid tumors and cancer cells [15,25-28], we extracted exosomal RNA from conditioned media and analyzed the expression of miR-21 in the conditioned media derived from MIAPaCa-2 PC cells and compared it with four separate samples of cancer associated stellate cells (PSCs) and one cancer-associated fibroblast cell (CAF-19). Total RNA was efficiently extracted from conditioned media, and was compared across multiple cell lines. There was a slight increase in miR-21 expression in CAF-19 cells compared to MIAPaCa-2 cells. Interestingly, miR-21 expression showed a significant increase in all four PSCs compared to MIAPaCa-2 cells, suggesting that miR-21 may be functioning as an oncogenic miRNA in PSCs (Figure 1A), which is consistent with the oncogenic role of miR-21 in PC as reported earlier [15,29].
Figure 1.

Comparative expression of miR-21 (A) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (B) in human PC cell line MIAPaCa-2, cancer associated fibroblast (CAF-19) and four cancer-associated stellate cells (PSCs). There was a significant up-regulation in the expression of miR-21 in all four PSCs tested followed by CAF-19 compared to MIAPaCa-2 cells. RNU48 was used as control miRNA. As expected, activation marker α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) was expressed in CAF-19 and in all four PSCs tested, but not in MIAPaCa-2 cells. p values represent comparison between MIAPaCa-2 with CAF-19 and PSCs. **≤ 0.005 and NS = non-significant.
Cancer associated stellate and fibroblast cells exhibited alpha smooth muscle actin expression
MIAPaCa-2 cells, CAF-19, and PSCs isolated from four different patients were assessed by immunostaining for the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). As expected α-SMA (a mesenchymal marker) expression was observed in all four PSCs and in CAF-19 cells, but not in MIAPaCa-2 cells as shown in Figure 1B.
Co-culture of PSCs and CAF-19 with PC cells exhibited increased clonogenicity and pancreatosphere formation
The effect of co-culture of PC cells with PSC (Figure 2A) and CAF-19 (Figure 2B) conditioned media was assessed by a clonogenic assay which showed a significant increase in colony formation by PC cells when compared to cells without conditioned media. These findings indicate the high clonogenic potential of conditioned media derived from PSCs and CAF-19 compared to PC cells. Similarly, there was an increase in the cancer-stem cell (CSC) self-renewal capacity with increased number of pancreatospheres formed by PC cells after 7 days of incubation with PSC but not with CAF-19 conditioned media, as compared to the number of pancreatospheres formed by PC cells unexposed to conditioned media (Figure 2), suggesting that secreted factors from PSCs have a remarkably higher potential to induce self-renewal of PC cells.
Figure 2.

Effect of co-culture of PC cell line COLO-357 with conditioned media derived from PSCs (A) and CAF-19 cells (B). There was a significant increase in colony formation of PC cells cultured with conditioned media derived from both PSCs and CAF-19 cells compared to untreated COLO-357 cells (A and B). Similarly there was an increase in pancreatosphere formation of PC cells cultured with conditioned media derived from both PSCs and CAF-19 cells compared to untreated COLO-357 cells (A and B). p values represent comparison between control cells and cells treated with conditioned media. **≤ 0.01 and NS = non-significant.
Expression of miR-21 was up-regulated in cancer associated stellate cells compared to stellate cells isolated from normal human pancreas
Since we observed a significant increase in miR-21 expression in all PSCs tested, we assessed its expression in normal stellate cells (nhPSCs). Both normal (non-cancerous pancreatic tissue derived stellate cells) and cancer associated stellate cells were isolated by the laboratory of Dr. Apte as described earlier [30]. We observed significantly lower expression of miR-21 in all three nhPSCs compared to cancer associated PSCs and to conditioned media from two of the PSCs tested as detailed under figure legend. Due to sample limitation, we were only able to compare miR-21 expression with only one cancer associated PSCs, and conditioned media derived from two preparations of PSC cells. Similarly, miR-21 expression in MIAPaCa-2 cells was higher than nhPSCs as presented in Figure 3. This increase in the expression of miR-21 in PSCs may play important roles in the tumor microenvironment associated with tumor aggressiveness of PC.
Figure 3.

Comparative expression of miR-21 in the conditioned media derived from nhPSC and PSCs/CAF-19, and the cells (PSCs, CAF-19 cells and PC cell line MIAPaCa-2). There was a significant up-regulation in the expression of miR-21 in both RNA preparation from intact cells and conditioned media derived from PSCs, followed by CAF-19 cells and MIAPaCa-2 cells compared to all three nhPSCs. RNU48 was used as control miRNA. p values represent data from two different experiments in triplicate and was compared against nhPSCs. **≤ 0.0001.
Transfection of anti-sense miR-21 in cancer associated stellate cells decreased cell migration and invasion
Significantly higher expression of miR-21 could be responsible for many biological processes as documented by numerous publications including chemo-resistance in colon cancer cells due to enriched undifferentiated cancer stem like cells [28]. The significant increase in migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines YTMLC-90 and NCI-H157 was observed, which was suppressed by knockdown of miR-21 expression [31]. Hence, we studied the effect of miR-21 ASO transfection on the migration and invasion of PSCs. The cells were transfected twice with ASO-miR-21 for 72 h. The transfected cells were used for cell migration and invasion assays. The transfection of ASO-miR-21 was confirmed by qRT-PCR, which revealed reduced expression of miR-21 as shown in Figure 4A. We also found that lowering the expression of miR-21 resulted in decreased cell migration compared to control ASO-miRNA transfected cells, as shown in Figure 4B. Likewise, the suppression of miR-21 resulted in decreased invasive capacity of these cells (Figure 4C). These results suggest that miR-21 is an oncogenic miRNA in PSCs and that lowering the expression of miR-21 leads to decreased cell migration and invasion. All PSCs isolated from three different patients showed similar results. Figure 4 data represents results from one of the three PSCs treated with ASO-miR-21.
Figure 4.

Treatment of PSCs with ASO miR21, led to a significant reduction in the expression of miR-21 as assessed by qRT-PCR (A), decreased cell migration (B), and decreased cell invasion (C) as assessed by chamber cell invasion assays. p values represent comparison between control ASO and ASO-miR-21. **≤ 0.007 and *≤ 0.05.
Transfection of anti-sense miR-221 in CAF-19 cells decreased cell migration, invasion, and the expression of K-Ras and NF-κB
Relative levels of miR-221 expression were measured both in the exosomal RNA and RNA derived from PC cell line MIAPaCa-2, as well as from cancer-associated fibroblast and stellate cells as presented in Figure 5A. As can be seen from the figure, the expression level of miR-221 was significantly higher in CAF-19 compared to PSCs and MIAPaCa-2 cells and in conditioned media. Thus, we wanted to assess whether lowering the expression of miR-221 by ASO transfection on CAF-19 cells would have any effect on migration, invasion, and the expression of K-Ras and NF-κB which are miR-221 targets [32,33]. The cells were transfected with anti-sense miR-221 (inhibitor) twice for 72 h. Transfection of ASO-miR-221 was confirmed by qRT-PCR showing reduced expression of miR-221 as depicted in Figure 5B. We also found that lowering the expression of miR-221 resulted in decreased cell migration and invasion compared to control inhibitor (control ASO-miRNA) transfected cells as demonstrated in Figure 5D. Furthermore, the suppression of miR-221 resulted in decreased expression of K-Ras, and NF-κB both at the mRNA level (Figure 5C) and at the protein level (Figure 5E). These results suggest that inhibiting the expression of miR-221 in CAF-19 cells led to the inhibition of cell migration, invasion, and the expression of its targets K-Ras and NF-κB. Hence targeting miR-221 in patients may serve as a novel treatment option for PC.
Figure 5.
Relative expression of miR-221 was compared in MIAPaCa-2, CAF-19 and PSCs both from cells and conditioned media (A), inactivation of miR-221 expression by ASO in CAF-19 cells led to reduced expression of miR-221 as assessed by qRT-PCR (B), decreased K-Ras and NF-κB mRNA expression assessed by qRT-PCR (C), decreased cell migration and invasion of cells by chamber cell invasion assays (D), and decreased K-Ras and NF-κB protein expression as assessed by western blot analysis and were quantified against β-actin (E) Controls used are: for miRNA (RNU48), mRNA (GAPDH), and protein (β-actin). p values represent comparison against MIAPaCa-2 in 5A, comparison against control ASO in 5B-E. **≤ 0.001, *≤ 0.01 and NS = non-significant.
Differential expression of miRNAs was observed by profiling of RNA derived from PSCs, CAF-19 and PC cells
RNA extracted from cancer-associated stellate, fibroblast and PC cell line MIAPaCa-2 and COLO-357 were profiled for miRNA analysis by LC Sciences, Houston, TX. Expression profiling revealed several differentially expressed miRNAs in PSCs, CAF-19, MIAPaCa-2 and COLO-357 cells. Four of the significantly up-regulated miRNAs in CAF-19 cells includes miR-99a, miR-100, miR-125b and miR-4488, whose expression was further validated by qRT-PCR using RNU48 as a control miRNA as presented in Figure 6. As evident from the Figure, these four miRNAs were found to be significantly increased in PSCs and CAFs compared to the cancer cell lines.
Figure 6.

Comparative expression of miR-99a-5p, miR-100-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-4488 in MIAPaCa-2, COLO-357, CAF-19, and Ca-hPSC 4 by qRT-PCR. There was a significant up-regulation in the expression of miR-99 and miR-100 in Ca-hPSC-4 compared to CAF-19 and both PC cell lines. The other two miRNAs miR-125 and miR-4488 showed significant up-regulation in both CAF-19 and Ca-hPSC4 compared to both PC cell lines. p values represent comparison between PC cells and Ca-hPSC 4. **≤ 0.0001.
Discussion
Emerging evidence suggests the importance of the interaction of tumor-stroma in the initiation and progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) or PC [34,35]. This signifies an inter-dependent relationship between PC and PSCs, resulting in an overall increase in tumor growth [34,35]. A schematic representation of the involvement of activated PSCs, CAF cells with PC cells in EMT, miRNAs and hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment that leads to tumor progression, survival and metastases is presented in Figure 7. The interaction of PSCs with neighboring cells in the tumor microenvironment such as cancer cells and cancer stem cells can increase ECM production, leading to increased fibrosis, proliferation and migration, which have been documented as typical desmoplasia seen in human PC. Cancer cells can corrupt the tumor microenvironment for its benefit and this process can be accomplished through partners in crime such as stellate cells and fibroblast and other cells, also involving exosomes and many soluble factors as reviewed recently [36].
Figure 7.

A schematic representation of the tumor microenvironment involving activated PSCs, CAF cells and their interactions with PC cells, EMT, miRNAs and hypoxia-all of which may lead to tumor progression, survival and metastases (tumor aggressiveness).
Upon exposure to conditioned media derived from PSCs and CAF-19 cells, COLO-357 PC cells, showed increased colony formation and formation of pancreatospheres compared to PC cells not exposed to conditioned media. This suggests that soluble factors are produced and secreted by PSCs and CAF cells that can confer tumor aggressiveness. Similarly, in vivo studies showed increased tumor growth and metastases in mouse models of PC co-injected with PC cells and PSCs when compared to models injected with PC cells alone, indicating the interaction of stromal fibroblasts and PC cells in promoting tumor progression in PC model [34,37].
Although there are few reports documenting up-regulation of miR-21 resulting in the activation of hepatic stellate cells causing liver fibrosis [38-41]; however, similar studies on human PSCs have not yet been reported. Human pancreatic cancer associated stellate cells (PSCs) are a subset of pancreatic cancer-associated myofibroblast-like cells that express the activation marker α-SMA and when activated these cells secrete ECM components and play a role in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis and PC. To the best of our knowledge, our current study is the first to demonstrate over-expression of miR-21 in cancer associated human PSCs compared to normal human PSCs and PC cells. The inhibition of miR-21 by ASO significantly decreased both cell migration and invasion of PSCs, suggesting that therapeutic targeting of this miRNA may interfere with the recruitment of PSCs to the vicinity of cancer cells, thereby inhibiting the tumor promoting cross-talk between the two cell types. The over-expression of miR-21 was also shown in lung fibroblasts in response to TGF-β, and inhibition with ASO-miR-21 diminished the harshness of lung fibrosis in mice, providing yet another example of miRNA targeted therapeutic approach for treating pulmonary fibrosis [42].
In spite of the discovery of exosomes three decades ago, the interest in these vesicles increased significantly only after finding the presence of mRNA and miRNA [43]. Exosomes are small membrane vesicles of endocytic origin that are released extracellularly in their secretions (conditioned media) of cultured cells [43]. A recent report by Charrier et al. in murine model of alcoholic pancreatitis revealed the presence of miR-21 and CCN2 expression in PSC-derived exosomes that stimulated delivery to other PSC [19]. Recent development suggests that cancer-associated stellate and fibroblast cells are present in the stroma of pancreatic tumors causing desmoplasia, and may lead to tumor invasion, metastasis and also resistance to therapy, suggesting that targeting these molecules associated with desmoplasia could serve as precision medicine.
Another study demonstrated the over-expression of miR-221 in paired samples of normal fibroblast when compared to cancer-associated fibroblast in six resected human breast cancer tissue samples. Their relationship with miR-221 was established with the activation of TGF-β and IL-6 signaling pathways [44]. In this study over-expression of miR-221 was correlated directly with over-expression of K-Ras and NF-κB in CAF which is another tissue contributing to desmoplastic reaction. The over-expression of K-Ras and NF-κB at the mRNA and protein level was reduced at both levels upon treatment with ASO-miR-221, which significantly decreased the migration and invasiveness of CAF-19 cells, suggesting that miRNA treatment might be a novel therapeutic approach to inhibit K-Ras signaling pathway. Hence, understanding the biological functions of miRNAs especially in the context of PC microenvironment will significantly help in the development of new and novel targeted therapies.
We also compared the expression profiling of PC cells MIAPaCa-2 and COLO-357 cells with PSCs and CAF cells, and found several miRNAs that were differentially expressed in the PSCs/CAF cells compared to both PC cells. Of the several deregulated miRNAs, we chose four up-regulated miRNAs for further validation using qRT-PCR and found that the expression of miR-125b and miR-4488 was significantly higher in both PSCs and CAF-19 cells compared to PC cells. In contrast, the expression of miR-99a and miR-100 was significantly up-regulated in PSCs compared to CAF-19 and PC cells, suggesting that although CAF and PSCs share many of the similar functions such as myofibroblast-like phenotype and α-SMA expression, these cells appears to be distinct from each other and there is a vast difference in the expression of miR-99a and miR-100.
In conclusion, this pre-clinical study provides a clear rationale for targeting PSCs and CAF cells within the tumor microenvironment using miRNA targeted therapeutics such as anti-sense oligonucleotides to inhibit migration and invasion, which will in turn inhibit tumor progression. Hence, effective methods should be developed to interrupt the interaction of PSCs/CAF cells with PC cells by developing novel approaches in order to prevent cancer progression which would likely improve the therapeutic outcome in the treatment of PC patients.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by grant from the National Cancer Institute, NIH 5R01CA154321 04 awarded to FHS. This work was also supported through grant support for ZX, JW and MA from the National Health and Medical Research Council (630509) and Cancer Council NSW (RG13-01).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
All the authors declare no competing conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Ma J, Siegel R, Jemal A. Pancreatic cancer death rates by race among US men and women, 1970-2009. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1694–1700. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, Klein AP, Erdek MA, Fishman EK, Hruban RH. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:318–348. doi: 10.3322/caac.21190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bao B, Azmi AS, Ali S, Zaiem F, Sarkar FH. Metformin may function as anti-cancer agent via targeting cancer stem cells: the potential biological significance of tumor-associated miRNAs in breast and pancreatic cancers. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2:59. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.06.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jiang JH, Liu C, Cheng H, Lu Y, Qin Y, Xu YF, Xu J, Long J, Liu L, Ni QX, Yu XJ. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer: Is it a clinically significant factor? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1855:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Apte MV, Wilson JS. Dangerous liaisons: pancreatic stellate cells and pancreatic cancer cells. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(Suppl 2):69–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ozdemir BC, Pentcheva-Hoang T, Carstens JL, Zheng X, Wu CC, Simpson TR, Laklai H, Sugimoto H, Kahlert C, Novitskiy SV, De Jesus-Acosta A, Sharma P, Heidari P, Mahmood U, Chin L, Moses HL, Weaver VM, Maitra A, Allison JP, LeBleu VS, Kalluri R. Depletion of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis induces immunosuppression and accelerates pancreas cancer with reduced survival. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:719–734. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Apte MV, Haber PS, Darby SJ, Rodgers SC, McCaughan GW, Korsten MA, Pirola RC, Wilson JS. Pancreatic stellate cells are activated by proinflammatory cytokines: implications for pancreatic fibrogenesis. Gut. 1999;44:534–541. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.4.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ohlund D, Elyada E, Tuveson D. Fibroblast heterogeneity in the cancer wound. J Exp Med. 2014;211:1503–1523. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scarlett CJ, Colvin EK, Pinese M, Chang DK, Morey AL, Musgrove EA, Pajic M, Apte M, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG, Biankin AV. Recruitment and activation of pancreatic stellate cells from the bone marrow in pancreatic cancer: a model of tumor-host interaction. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li J, Wientjes MG, Au JL. Pancreatic cancer: pathobiology, treatment options, and drug delivery. AAPS J. 2010;12:223–232. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9181-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bao B, Ali S, Ahmad A, Azmi AS, Li Y, Banerjee S, Kong D, Sethi S, Aboukameel A, Padhye SB, Sarkar FH. Hypoxia-induced aggressiveness of pancreatic cancer cells is due to increased expression of VEGF, IL-6 and miR-21, which can be attenuated by CDF treatment. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ali AS, Ali S, Ahmad A, Bao B, Philip PA, Sarkar FH. Expression of microRNAs: potential molecular link between obesity, diabetes and cancer. Obes Rev. 2011;12:1050–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Quiat D, Olson EN. MicroRNAs in cardiovascular disease: from pathogenesis to prevention and treatment. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:11–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI62876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ahmad A, Maitah MY, Ginnebaugh KR, Li Y, Bao B, Gadgeel SM, Sarkar FH. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling sensitizes NSCLC cells to standard therapies through modulation of EMT-regulating miRNAs. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:77. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ali S, Almhanna K, Chen W, Philip PA, Sarkar FH. Differentially expressed miRNAs in the plasma may provide a molecular signature for aggressive pancreatic cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2010;3:28–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ali S, Saleh H, Sethi S, Sarkar FH, Philip PA. MicroRNA profiling of diagnostic needle aspirates from patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1354–1360. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ali S, Ahmad A, Aboukameel A, Ahmed A, Bao B, Banerjee S, Philip PA, Sarkar FH. Deregulation of miR-146a expression in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer affecting EGFR signaling. Cancer Lett. 2014;351:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sethi S, Ali S, Sethi S, Sarkar FH. MicroRNAs in personalized cancer therapy. Clin Genet. 2014;86:68–73. doi: 10.1111/cge.12362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Charrier A, Chen R, Chen L, Kemper S, Hattori T, Takigawa M, Brigstock DR. Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) and microRNA-21 are components of a positive feedback loop in pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) during chronic pancreatitis and are exported in PSC-derived exosomes. J Cell Commun Signal. 2014;8:147–156. doi: 10.1007/s12079-014-0220-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Masamune A, Nakano E, Hamada S, Takikawa T, Yoshida N, Shimosegawa T. Alteration of the microRNA expression profile during the activation of pancreatic stellate cells. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:323–331. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.876447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shen J, Wan R, Hu G, Yang L, Xiong J, Wang F, Shen J, He S, Guo X, Ni J, Guo C, Wang X. miR-15b and miR-16 induce the apoptosis of rat activated pancreatic stellate cells by targeting Bcl-2 in vitro. Pancreatology. 2012;12:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takikawa T, Masamune A, Hamada S, Nakano E, Yoshida N, Shimosegawa T. miR-210 regulates the interaction between pancreatic cancer cells and stellate cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;437:433–439. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Walter K, Omura N, Hong SM, Griffith M, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer associated fibro blasts display normal allelotypes. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7:882–888. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.6.5869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Walter K, Omura N, Hong SM, Griffith M, Vincent A, Borges M, Goggins M. Overexpression of smoothened activates the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer associated fibroblasts. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1781–1789. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bao B, Ahmad A, Kong D, Ali S, Azmi AS, Li Y, Banerjee S, Padhye S, Sarkar FH. Hypoxia induced aggressiveness of prostate cancer cells is linked with deregulated expression of VEGF, IL-6 and miRNAs that are attenuated by CDF. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Parasramka MA, Ali S, Banerjee S, Deryavoush T, Sarkar FH, Gupta S. Garcinol sensitizes human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells to gemcitabine in association with microRNA signatures. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57:235–248. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Roy S, Yu Y, Padhye SB, Sarkar FH, Majumdar AP. Difluorinated-curcumin (CDF) restores PTEN expression in colon cancer cells by down-regulating miR-21. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu Y, Sarkar FH, Majumdar AP. Down-regulation of miR-21 Induces Differentiation of Chemoresistant Colon Cancer Cells and Enhances Susceptibility to Therapeutic Regimens. Transl Oncol. 2013;6:180–186. doi: 10.1593/tlo.12397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ali S, Ahmad A, Banerjee S, Padhye S, Dominiak K, Schaffert JM, Wang Z, Philip PA, Sarkar FH. Gemcitabine sensitivity can be induced in pancreatic cancer cells through modulation of miR-200 and miR-21 expression by curcumin or its analogue CDF. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3606–3617. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 30.Vonlaufen A, Phillips PA, Yang L, Xu Z, Fiala-Beer E, Zhang X, Pirola RC, Wilson JS, Apte MV. Isolation of quiescent human pancreatic stellate cells: a promising in vitro tool for studies of human pancreatic stellate cell biology. Pancreatology. 2010;10:434–443. doi: 10.1159/000260900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu LF, Wu ZP, Chen Y, Zhu QS, Hamidi S, Navab R. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) regulates cellular proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis by targeting PTEN, RECK and Bcl-2 in lung squamous carcinoma, Gejiu City, China. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lupini L, Bassi C, Ferracin M, Bartonicek N, D’Abundo L, Zagatti B, Callegari E, Musa G, Moshiri F, Gramantieri L, Corrales FJ, Enright AJ, Sabbioni S, Negrini M. miR-221 affects multiple cancer pathways by modulating the level of hundreds messenger RNAs. Front Genet. 2013;4:64. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsunoda T, Takashima Y, Yoshida Y, Doi K, Tanaka Y, Fujimoto T, Machida T, Ota T, Koyanagi M, Kuroki M, Sasazuki T, Shirasawa S. Oncogenic KRAS regulates miR-200c and miR-221/222 in a 3D-specific manner in colorectal cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:2453–2459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hwang RF, Moore T, Arumugam T, Ramachandran V, Amos KD, Rivera A, Ji B, Evans DB, Logsdon CD. Cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts promote pancreatic tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2008;68:918–926. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Omary MB, Lugea A, Lowe AW, Pandol SJ. The pancreatic stellate cell: a star on the rise in pancreatic diseases. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:50–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI30082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Azmi AS, Bao B, Sarkar FH. Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and drug resistance: a comprehensive review. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32:623–642. doi: 10.1007/s10555-013-9441-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schneiderhan W, Diaz F, Fundel M, Zhou S, Siech M, Hasel C, Moller P, Gschwend JE, Seufferlein T, Gress T, Adler G, Bachem MG. Pancreatic stellate cells are an important source of MMP-2 in human pancreatic cancer and accelerate tumor progression in a murine xenograft model and CAM assay. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:512–519. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Francis H, McDaniel K, Han Y, Liu X, Kennedy L, Yang F, McCarra J, Zhou T, Glaser S, Venter J, Huang L, Levine P, Lai JM, Liu CG, Alpini G, Meng F. Regulation of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway by microRNA-21 in alcoholic liver injury. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:27526–27539. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.602383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.McDaniel K, Herrera L, Zhou T, Francis H, Han Y, Levine P, Lin E, Glaser S, Alpini G, Meng F. The functional role of microRNAs in alcoholic liver injury. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:197–207. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wei J, Feng L, Li Z, Xu G, Fan X. MicroRNA-21 activates hepatic stellate cells via PTEN/Akt signaling. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013;67:387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2013.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang Z, Zha Y, Hu W, Huang Z, Gao Z, Zang Y, Chen J, Dong L, Zhang J. The autoregulatory feedback loop of microRNA-21/programmed cell death protein 4/activation protein-1 (MiR-21/PDCD4/AP-1) as a driving force for hepatic fibrosis development. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:37082–37093. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.517953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu G, Friggeri A, Yang Y, Milosevic J, Ding Q, Thannickal VJ, Kaminski N, Abraham E. miR-21 mediates fibrogenic activation of pulmonary fibroblasts and lung fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2010;207:1589–1597. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thery C. Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. F1000 Biol Rep. 2011;3:15. doi: 10.3410/B3-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhao L, Sun Y, Hou Y, Peng Q, Wang L, Luo H, Tang X, Zeng Z, Liu M. MiRNA expression analysis of cancer-associated fibroblasts and normal fibroblasts in breast cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44:2051–2059. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

