Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2015 Apr 8;66(11):3417–3428. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv154

Differential effects of lesion mimic mutants in barley on disease development by facultative pathogens

Graham R D McGrann 1,*, , Andrew Steed 1, Christopher Burt 2, Paul Nicholson 1, James K M Brown 1,*
PMCID: PMC4449554  PMID: 25873675

Highlight

Different pathways that regulate cell death have distinct effects on diverse pathogens. MLO and NEC1, which both suppress cell death, interact with one another in their effects on pathogenic fungi.

Key words: Cell death, disease resistance, endophyte, hemibiotroph, hypersensitive response, mlo, necrotroph, plant-microbe interactions.

Abstract

Lesion mimic mutants display spontaneous necrotic spots and chlorotic leaves as a result of mis-regulated cell death programmes. Typically these mutants have increased resistance to biotrophic pathogens but their response to facultative fungi that cause necrotrophic diseases is less well studied. The effect of altered cell death regulation on the development of disease caused by Ramularia collo-cygni, Fusarium culmorum and Oculimacula yallundae was explored using a collection of barley necrotic (nec) lesion mimic mutants. nec8 mutants displayed lower levels of all three diseases compared to nec9 mutants, which had increased R. collo-cygni but decreased F. culmorum disease symptoms. nec1 mutants reduced disease development caused by both R. collo-cygni and F. culmorum. The severity of the nec1-induced lesion mimic phenotype and F. culmorum symptom development was reduced by mutation of the negative cell death regulator MLO. The significant reduction in R. collo-cygni symptoms caused by nec1 was completely abolished in the presence of the mlo-5 allele and both symptoms and fungal biomass were greater than in the wild-type. These results indicate that physiological pathways involved in regulation of cell death interact with one another in their effects on different fungal pathogens.

Introduction

Programmed cell death is essential for many plant developmental processes such as leaf senescence and plays a critical role in defence against pathogens (Jones, 2001). Localized cell death at the sites of pathogen infection is termed the hypersensitive response (HR). HR forms part of the defence response referred to as effector triggered immunity (ETI), which is associated with the production of antimicrobial compounds, cell wall cross-linking, deposition of callose, and a prolonged reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst (Nurnberger et al., 2004; Jones and Dangl, 2006). ETI is particularly effective against pathogens that have a biotrophic lifestyle, requiring living host tissue on which to feed (Glazebrook, 2005; Jones and Dangl, 2006). However, the role of cell death in defence against facultative pathogens that may benefit from, or actively induce host cell death is not as clear. Cell death can operate against some hemibiotrophic pathogens that require a period of biotrophic development before becoming necrotrophic but is not effective against pathogens during the necrotrophic phase (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012).

Mutagenesis of plants resulting in altered disease resistance has proved valuable in dissecting the defence response to different pathogens (Hammond-Kosack and Parker 2003). Lesion mimic mutants develop spontaneous necrotic lesions in the absence of pathogen infection. This phenotype is caused by altered regulation of cell death processes such as HR and senescence or by perturbation of metabolic pathways resulting in cell death (Dangl et al., 1996). Mutations in genes involved in processes such as cellular signalling, chlorophyll biosynthesis, redox homeostasis, and disease resistance can result in lesion mimic phenotypes and these have advanced our understanding of the programmed cell death and HR pathways (Dangl et al., 1996; Lorrain et al., 2003; Moeder & Yoshioka, 2008). As a consequence of the association with cell death, lesion mimic mutants often exhibit accelerated leaf senescence and altered ROS homeostasis (Lorrain et al., 2003). Lesion mimic mutants have been extensively studied in relation to plant defence responses and typically show enhanced resistance against biotrophic pathogens such as rusts and mildews (Kamlofski et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009). More variable responses have been reported between lesion mimics and facultative fungi, ranging from enhanced resistance (Persson et al., 2008; 2009) to super-susceptibility (Wright et al., 2013).

One gene of agronomic significance which when mutated in barley causes necrotic lesions is MLO. Recessive mlo mutations confer broad-spectrum durable resistance to the obligate biotrophic powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei and cause developmentally controlled lesion mimic phenotypes in the absence of disease (Wolter et al., 1993). Mutant MLO alleles have associated deleterious agronomic effects including reduced yield (Kjaer et al., 1990) and increased susceptibility to some facultative pathogens such as Fusarium graminearum (Jansen et al., 2005), Magnaporthe oryzae (Jarrosch et al., 1999), Bipolaris sorokiniana (Kumar et al., 2001) and Ramularia collo-cygni (McGrann et al., 2014). MLO encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that has been proposed to act as a negative regulator of cell death and disease resistance (Peterhänsel et al., 1997; Piffanelli et al., 2002), but the exact biochemical function of this protein remains undetermined (Buschges et al., 1997).

Necrotic (nec) mutants from a fast-neutron exposed barley collection show varying degrees of leaf spotting, chlorosis and in most cases increased expression of HR-induced genes (Rostoks et al., 2003). Genetic analyses of some of these mutants have identified the genes responsible for the lesion mimic phenotype. nec1 mutants which show reduced basal resistance against powdery mildew fungi and enhanced nonhost resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Keisa et al., 2011) have mutations in a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 4 protein (CNGC4; Rostoks et al., 2006). CNGCs are cation channel proteins involved in regulating intracellular fluxes of ions such as Ca2+ (Ma and Berkowitz, 2011). These non-selective cation channels have been well studied in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and function in biological processes including ion homeostasis, development, plant defence and programmed cell death (Ma and Berkowitz, 2011; Moeder et al., 2011). Barley nec8 mutants show elevated resistance against stem rust (Puccinia graminis) but not stripe rust (P. striiformis f. sp. hordei; Zhang et al., 2009). Transcript-based cloning identified a cation/proton exchanging protein as a strong candidate for nec8 (Zhang et al., 2009) further highlighting the role of mis-regulation cellular cation concentrations in the development of the lesion mimic phenotype, the cell death programme and plant defence responses (Ma and Berkowitz, 2011).

This study examined the response of a collection of barley lesion mimic mutants to facultative fungal pathogens that exhibit different life habits. Ramularia collo-cygni is an endophytic fungus that under certain environmental conditions becomes a necrotrophic pathogen causing the disease Ramularia leaf spot (RLS; Walters et al., 2008; Havis et al., 2015). R. collo-cygni develops asymptomatically from infected seed (Havis et al., 2014) and from air-borne spore infection (Stabentheiner et al., 2009) with disease symptoms typically occurring at the end of the growing season coincident with a decline in the host antioxidant system as the crop senesces, suggesting that RLS development may be linked to host stress (Schützendübel et al., 2008; McGrann et al., 2015). Oculimacula yallundae is a hemibiotrophic pathogen and one of the fungal species responsible for the stem base eyespot disease of cereals. Similar to R. collo-cygni, O. yallundae has a long period of asymptomatic colonization before the fungus enters the necrotrophic disease-causing phase (Blein et al., 2009). Fusarium culmorum is also a hemibiotrophic fungus that causes disease in the ears, stems, leaves and roots of cereal plants (Scherm et al., 2013). Post inoculation disease symptoms form rapidly following a short period of biotrophic development, with disease lesions visible within a few days (Chen et al., 2009). The data reported here shows that symptom development of these three diseases is differentially affected in barley nec mutants. Furthermore, this data highlights a previously unreported functional relationship between the NEC1 and MLO genes in the regulation of plant-pathogen interactions and programmed cell death pathways.

Material and methods

Plant material

Details of the barley lesion mimic mutants used in this study are shown in Table 1. Seeds were sown in 8×8×10cm pots containing Levington F2 compost media (Scotts Professional, Ipswich, UK). Plants were grown in a controlled environment room (Sanyo) with a day/night photoperiod of 16h/8h at temperatures of 18/12°C supplemented with 220 μmol m-2 s-1 fluorescent lighting before and after inoculation.

Table 1.

Barley lesion mimic mutants used in this study

Line Mutation Mutagen Background Seed source Reference
Steptoe None n/a Wild-type n/a
Morex None n/a Wild-type n/a
FN044 nec8 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Zhang et al. (2009)
FN085 nec1 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003, 2006)
FN093 Unknown Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
FN211 nec8 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Zhang et al. (2009)
FN227 nec9 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
FN303 nec8 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Zhang et al. (2009)
FN338 nec1 Fast neutron Morex M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003, 2006)
FN364 nec9 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
FN366 Unknown Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
FN367 Unknown Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
FN370 nec1 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003, 2006)
FN450 nec9 Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
FN451 Unknown Fast neutron Steptoe M2-selection Rostoks et al. (2003)
Parkland (G10-30) None n/a Wild-type n/a Keisa et al. (2011)
GSH01284 (G10-29) nec1 Spontaneous Parkland n/a Keisa et al. (2011)
G10-31 nec1+mlo5 Spontaneous + ethyl methanesulfonate GSH01284 × Carlsberg II F4 family Keisa et al. (2011)
G10-32 nec1 Spontaneous GSH01284 × Carlsberg II F4 family Keisa et al. (2011)
G10-34 None n/a GSH01284 × Carlsberg II F4 family Keisa et al. (2011)
G10-36 mlo5 Ethyl methanesulfonate GSH01284 × Carlsberg II F4 family Keisa et al. (2011)

Ramularia collo-cygni inoculation

Fourteen-day-old prophyll leaves were inoculated with a liquid inoculum containing macerated hyphal fragments of R. collo-cygni isolate Rcc09B4 based on the method of Makepeace et al. (2008) with the modifications outlined in Peraldi et al. (2014). Disease symptoms were assessed 3–5 times 10–21 days post inoculation (dpi) and the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) calculated. Disease levels were measured on 5–10 plants of each barley line in four independent inoculation experiments.

Fusarium culmorum inoculation

Detached leaves were inoculated with two 5 µl droplets of 106 conidia ml-1 of F. culmorum isolate Fu42 supplemented with 75 µM deoxynivalenol (DON) as previously described (Chen et al., 2009). Disease spread was photographed and assessed 48h post inoculation by measuring lesion area on leaves using ImageJ (Abramoff et al., 2004). Two independent replicate experiments each containing a minimum of six replicate leaves of each line were inoculated.

Oculimacula yallundae inoculation

The stem bases of 21-day-old plants were inoculated with O. yallundae isolate P149 using the method of Chapman et al. (2008). The experiment consisting of five replicate blocks each containing five plants of each line was conducted in a randomized block design. Disease assessments were made 8 weeks post inoculation using the scale of Scott (1971) to represent the number of leaf sheaths penetrated and colonized by the fungus.

qPCR detection of Ramularia collo-cygni DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from prophyll leaves of each mutant and its mother line 21 dpi using the DNeasy Plant DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to assess R. collo-cygni DNA levels using qPCR (Taylor et al., 2010). A minimum of two leaves from each barley line were sampled from three independent R. collo-cygni inoculation experiments.

Transcript expression analysis

Transcript levels were assessed in uninfected prophyll leaves sampled from three individual 14-day-old (growth stage 12; Zadoks et al., 1974) plants grown in three separate experiments. RNA was extracted, processed and converted to cDNA as previously described (Colebrook et al., 2012). Levels of gene expression were analysed using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and the Sybr Green Jump StartTM Taq (Sigma) system following the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification and melt curve analysis were performed using a DNA engine Opticon2 Continuous Fluorescence Detector (MJ Research Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) as previously detailed (Colebrook et al., 2012). Five reference genes (elongation factor 1 α, cyclophilin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, α-tubulin and ubiquitin; McGrann et al., 2009; Colebrook et al., 2012) were used for cDNA normalization (Vandesompele et al., 2002). Transcript abundance was measured using gene specific primers (Supplementary Table S1; Shagimardanova et al., 2010) and expression calculated relative to Steptoe.

SPAD meter readings for dark-induced senescence

Prophyll leaves from six individual plants at growth stage 12 (Zadoks et al., 1974) were removed and chlorophyll measurements taken from the excised leaves (day 0) using a Chlorophyll Meter SPAD-502 (Konica Minolta, Warrington, UK). Each measurement was produced from the mean of three readings taken from the tip, middle and bottom sections of each leaf. Leaves were then transferred to damp tissue paper in square plastic Petri dishes, wrapped in aluminium foil and placed in a box at room temperature to stimulate dark-induced senescence. Relative chlorophyll measurements were taken at 2, 4 and 6 d after dark treatment as described above. Data were collected from three independent experiments.

Measuring lesion mimic mutant spots

Plants were sown in F2 compost in 3×3×5cm (P60) and grown in an outside glasshouse under natural light with temperatures ranging from 6°C to 27°C. Prophyll leaves from growth stage 12 (Zadoks et al., 1974) were sampled from each line, photographed and the area of each leaf covered with lesion mimics assessed using ImageJ software (Abramoff et al., 2004). Leaves were collected from plants grown on seven separate occasions.

Data analysis

All data was analysed using GenStat v. 15 (Payne et al., 2009). R. collo-cygni pathology data measured as the AUDPC and expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible AUDPC was LOGIT transformed and analysed using general linear modelling (GLM) as previously described (McGrann et al., 2014). F. culmorum data was LOG transformed and analysed using a generalized linear model. The model used to analyse the R. collo-cygni and F. culmorum pathology data was Experiment+Line. Raw data from the O. yallundae experiments were analysed with a GLM with block and line as factors. The model used was Block+Line. Variation in R. collo-cygni Log10 DNA levels was assessed using a GLM with experiment and line as factors. The model was Experiment+Line. Dark-induced senescence data was analysed with linear mixed modelling of repeated measurements using the uniform correlation/split plot in time covariance matrix. The fixed model was Experiment*Day*Line and the random model was Leaf*Day. Leaf lesion area variation of nec1 and mlo5 mutants was analysed with a GLM with experiment and line as factors. The model used was Experiment+Line. Significant differences between lines, and between lines and days in the dark-induced senescence experiment, were subsequently assessed using a t-test conducted within the specific model for each analysis performed.

Results

Development of Ramularia leaf spot symptoms on barley lesion mimic mutants

Lesion mimic phenotypes of the nec mutant lines have been reported elsewhere (Rostoks et al., 2003; Keisa et al., 2011) and range from leaves expressing a few small necrotic spots (nec1), to leaves displaying numerous necrotic patches covering a large proportion of the leaf area (nec8) and plants with leaves that show a chlorotic phenotype with a few necrotic regions (nec9; Supplementary Fig. S1). Ramularia leaf spots were distinguished based on the characteristic reddish brown colour and ‘box-shape’ of the lesions, which are delineated by the leaf veins. This distinctive appearance of the RLS lesions contrasts with the spotting and necrosis associated with the different lesion mimic phenotypes which varied in colour from dark brown to black, dependent on the mutant line, and were typically spread across leaf veins and so allowed accurate scoring of disease symptoms on each mutant.

Mutation of the NEC1 locus significantly decreased the development of Ramularia leaf spots in FN085 and FN370 (P<0.01) compared to Steptoe, and disease progressed more slowly in the nec1 mutant FN338 than in the Morex parent line (P=0.05; Fig. 1A). In a separate set of experiments the nec1 mutant GSH01284 also showed reduced Ramularia leaf spot development (P<0.001) compared to its parent line Parkland (Fig. 2A). All three nec8 mutants, FN044, FN211 and FN303, exhibited significantly fewer Ramularia leaf spot symptoms than Steptoe (P<0.001) as did the mutant FN451 (P<0.001; Fig. 1A). In contrast the three nec9 mutants exhibited significantly more disease symptoms than Steptoe (FN227 P<0.01, FN364 P<0.001, FN450 P<0.05). Representative images of RLS symptoms on Steptoe and lesion mimic phenotype lines in this background are shown for nec1 (FN085), nec8 (FN303) and nec9 (FN227, FN364, FN450) plants in Supplementary Fig. S1. None of the mutants FN093, FN366 or FN367 showed significantly different levels of Ramularia leaf spot development compared to Steptoe wild-type (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Development of Ramularia leaf spot (RLS) in barley lesion mimic mutants in cv. Steptoe or cv. Morex. (A) Disease symptom expression presented as the area under disease progress curve of RLS (B) R. collo-cygni DNA in leaves of lesion mimic mutants. *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; *P <0.05.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Development of Ramularia leaf spot (RLS) in barley lesion mimic mutants in cv. Parkland. (A) Disease symptom expression presented as the area under disease progress curve of RLS (B) R. collo-cygni DNA in leaves of lesion mimic mutants. *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; *P <0.05.

Quantification of R. collo-cygni in planta using fungal DNA levels

None of the mutants FN044, FN085, FN093, FN211, FN338, FN366, FN367, FN370, FN451 or GSH01284 had levels of R. collo-cygni DNA significantly different to their respective mother lines (Figs 1B, 2B) but the nec8 mutant FN303 had significantly less fungal DNA than Steptoe (P<0.01; Fig. 1B). All three nec9 mutants had significantly increased levels of fungal DNA compared to Steptoe (FN227 P<0.01, FN364 P=0.001, FN450 P<0.01; Fig. 1B), consistent with the observed increase in disease symptom development in these mutants.

Effect of nec mutants on symptom development of O. yallundae and Fusarium culmorum

The response of Steptoe and the FN085 (nec1), FN303 (nec8) and FN227 (nec9) mutants was also tested against the facultative fungal pathogens O. yallundae and F. culmorum. No significant differences in O. yallundae disease scores were observed for FN085 (nec1) or FN227 (nec9) compared to Steptoe, but disease development was significantly reduced on FN303 (nec8) (P<0.001; Fig. 3A). The size of F. culmorum lesions were significantly reduced on the leaves of all three mutants compared to those on the parent line (P<0.001). The effect of the nec1 mutation on F. culmorum lesion size was confirmed by screening additional nec1 mutants in the Steptoe (FN370), Morex (FN338) and Parkland (GSH01284) backgrounds. Presence of the nec1 mutation reduced F. culmorum lesion size in Morex (P<0.01; Fig. 3B) and Parkland (P<0.001, Fig. 3B) and in the Steptoe nec1 mutant FN370 (P<0.05; Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Development of disease symptoms caused by (A) Oculimacula yallundae, (B) Fusarium culmorum on selected barley lesion mimic mutants. *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; *P <0.05.

qRT-PCR transcript profiling antioxidant and defence-related genes in selected barley lesion mimic mutants

During necrotrophic development facultative fungi can exploit elevated in planta ROS production to promote colonization (Heller and Tudzynski, 2011). Therefore the expression levels of ROS scavenging transcripts were measured in nec1 (FN085), nec8 (FN303), and nec9 mutants (FN227, FN364, FN450) to assess the constitutive antioxidant status of these plants in pathogen-free conditions. All three allelic nec9 mutants were investigated to test for common changes in the antioxidant system potentially related to enhanced susceptibility to RLS. Changes in expression of genes involved in antioxidant activity were generally low in the mutants; none of the mutants consistently exhibited a greater than 2-fold increase in transcript levels of any of the antioxidant genes tested (Table 2). All five mutants showed greater than 2-fold decrease in Glutathione peroxidase 2 (GPX2) transcript levels but this repression was strongest in the three nec9 mutants. Expression of Glutathione reductase 1 (GR1) was also reduced in all five mutants but transcript repression greater than 2-fold was only recorded for the three nec9 mutants (FN227, FN364, FN450). There was no noteworthy change in expression of Glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase 1 (CSD1) or Catalase 1 (Cat1) in any of the mutants compared to Steptoe whereas as Catalase 2 (Cat2) showed more than a 2-fold decrease in transcript levels in FN450 alone. Transcript levels of Ascorbate peroxidase 1 (APX1) and Ascorbate peroxidase 2 (APX2) were reduced in FN085, FN303, FN364 and FN450 but not FN227 (Table 2).

Table 2.

qRT-PCR expression analysis of barley antioxidant and defence-related transcripts in selected lesion mimic mutants in cv. Steptoe

Steptoe FN085 (nec1 ) FN303 (nec8 ) FN227 (nec9 ) FN364 (nec9 ) FN450 (nec9 )
Antioxidants
Ascorbate peroxidase 1
(APX1)
1.000
(±0.129)
0.486
(±0.104)
0.405
(±0.075)
0.802
(±0.174)
0.584
(±0.084)
0.544
(±0.093)
Ascorbate peroxidase 2
(APX2)
1.000
(±0.245)
0.543
(±0.123)
0.656
(±0.110)
1.270
(±0.588)
0.580
(±0.147)
0.398
(±0.077)
Catalase 1
(CAT1)
1.000
(±0.348)
1.369
(±0.518)
1.745
(±0.516)
1.208
(±0.427)
1.598
(±0.505)
1.901
(±0.392)
Catalase 2
(CAT2)
1.000
(±0.386)
1.906
(±0.693)
1.960
(±0.402)
1.156
(±0.342)
1.428
(±0.467)
0.403
(±0.079)
Glutathionine peroxidase 1
(GPX1)
1.000
(±0.320)
0.941
(±0.280)
1.240
(±0.210)
1.208
(±0.252)
1.427
(±0.285)
1.463
(±0.346)
Glutathionine peroxidase 2
(GPX2)
1.000
(±0.126)
0.498
(0.123)
0.370
(±0.068)
0.244
(±0.056)
0.229
(±0.048)
0.066
(±0.008)
Copper/Zinc superoxide dismutase 1
(CSD1)
1.000
(±0.125)
1.595
(±0.455)
1.38
(±0.221)
1.05
(±0.088)
1.432
(±0.246)
1.269
(±0.198)
Glutathione reductase 1
(GR1)
1.000
(±0.058)
0.524
(±0.145)
0.672
(±0.142)
0.471
(±0.064)
0.434
(±0.076)
0.420
(±0.060)
Defence-related
Pathogenesis-related 1
(PR1)
1.000
(±0.245)
125.217
(±35.130)
94.328
(±15.461)
51.110
(±13.154)
53.724
(±23.629)
39.386
(±7.111)
BAX-inhibitor 1
(BI-1)
1.000
(±0.379)
1.549
(±0.429)
3.011
(±0.480)
0.881
(±0.194)
0.925
(±0.199)
0.571
(±0.089)

Mean normalised expression values are rescaled relative to Steptoe to show fold-change differences in transcript levels in mutant leaves compared to wild-type: >2-fold repressed, italics; >2-fold induced, bold (standard error shown in parentheses).

Transcript levels of the defence-related Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) and the cell death regulator Bax-1 inhibitor (BI-1) were also monitored in all five lesion mimic mutants. PR1 transcript levels were increased more than 30-fold in all five lesion mimic mutants tested (Table 2), whereas the BI-1 transcript was induced (~3-fold) in the nec8 mutant only (Table 2).

Analysis of dark-induced senescence in barley lesion mimic mutants

Senescence is a cell death process that is generally believed to assist with maintaining plant health by nutrient remobilization to areas of new vegetative growth (Jones, 2001). Lesion mimic mutants often also exhibit accelerated senescence (Lorrain et al., 2003; Moeder & Yoshioka, 2008). Dark-induced senescence was used to determine if nec1, nec8 and nec9 mutations affect leaf senescence. Leaves of the nec8 and nec9 mutants had significantly lower SPAD readings than the parent Steptoe line at the time of detachment from the plant and before senescence was induced (P<0.001). The nec1 mutant, however, had SPAD readings comparable to those of Steptoe (Fig. 4). After two and four days of dark treatment the nec1, nec8 and nec9 mutants all had significantly lower (P<0.001) SPAD readings than wild-type. After six days of dark treatment all lines had much reduced SPAD readings and no significant differences were observed between Steptoe and the nec1 and nec8 lines and the nec9 mutant FN450. Two nec9 mutants however (FN227 and FN364) had senesced to a greater degree than Steptoe and had significantly lower SPAD readings than the wild-type (P<0.05 and P<0.01 respectively).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Rate of dark-induced senescence in selected lesion mimic mutants.

Functional relationship between NEC1 and MLO

As both NEC1 and MLO have been implicated in regulation of cell death processes (Peterhänsel et al., 1997; Piffanelli et al., 2002; Ma and Berkowitz, 2011; Moeder et al., 2011) the relationship between the two genes was tested using a nec1+mlo-5 double mutant (Keisa et al., 2011). Firstly whether the nec1 mutation affected mlo-5-enhanced RLS susceptibility was examined. The nec1 single mutant (G10-32) showed reduced RLS disease symptom development (P<0.001; Fig. 5A) compared to the NEC1+MLO wild-type line (G10-34) whereas the mlo-5 mutant line (G10-36) had increased disease levels compared to the wild-type (P=0.001; Fig. 5A) as previously observed (Figs 1A, 2A). The nec1+mlo-5 double mutant (G10-31) had significantly increased disease development compared to the nec1 single mutant and the wild-type lines (P=0.001; Fig. 5A). R. collo-cygni DNA levels were also higher in both the mlo-5 single mutant and nec1+mlo-5 double mutant compared to nec1 single mutant and the wild-type lines (Fig. 5B). There was no significant difference in fungal DNA levels between the nec1 mutant and wild-type line (P=0.435; Fig. 5B).

The mlo-5 mutation has been implicated in increasing susceptibility to Fusarium infection of barley. This mutation was shown to result in increased F. graminearum development in barley caryopses (Jansen et al., 2005). Therefore the effect of the mlo-5 mutation alone and mlo-5 and nec1 together on the F. culmorum lesion development was examined in foliar assays. In the detached leaf assays used in this study, none of the different mlo mutations in various genetic backgrounds showed a significant effect on F. culmorum lesion development (Supplementary Fig. S2). As observed above, lesions were smaller in the presence of the nec1 mutation (Fig. 6A). However, F. culmorum lesions were significantly larger in the nec1+mlo-5 double mutant than in the nec1 single mutant (G10-32; P<0.001). Functional ROR genes are required for susceptibility to the necrotrophic stage of R. collo-cygni in mlo plants (McGrann et al., 2014). The effect of the ror1-2 mutation of on F. culmorum lesion development was assessed using the detached leaf assay. The presence of the ror1-2 mutation in the mlo-5 background significantly reduced lesion size compared to either the single mlo-5 or wild-type Ingrid plants (Fig. 7; P<0.01).

The relationship between MLO and NEC1 was further examined by visual assessment of the nec1 lesion mimic phenotype itself in the different genotypes. As expected both nec1 single mutants (G10-32 and GSH01284) had significantly more leaf area covered with lesions than their respective NEC1+MLO wild-type lines (G10-34, Parkland) (Fig. 6B, C; P<0.001). The nec1+mlo-5 double mutant showed increased lesion coverage compared to NEC1+MLO line (G10-34; P<0.001) but had significantly less lesion area than the nec1+MLO mutant (G10-32; Fig. 6C; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in lesion coverage between NEC1+MLO and mlo-5 single mutant (G10-35; P=0.422).

Discussion

Programmed cell death is critical for many plant developmental processes and defence responses (Jones, 2001). Cell death is typically a component of the defence response against biotrophic pathogens, whereas its role in interactions between plants and facultative pathogens with hemibiotrophic or necrotrophic lifestyles can be somewhat ambivalent (Jarosch et al., 1999; Kumar et al., 2001; Mengiste, 2012; Saville et al., 2012; Wright et al., 2013). This investigation, using a collection of diverse lesion mimic mutants that differentially regulate disease symptom expression caused by facultative fungi on barley, highlights the complex relationship between host cell death and disease development in plants.

Reduced disease development by all three facultative pathogens was observed on each of the three nec8 alleles tested. nec8 mutation also confers enhanced resistance against the biotroph Puccinia graminis and is thought to encode a cation/proton exchange protein, HvCAX1 (Zhang et al., 2009). Regulation of ion flux is critical to maintain cellular homeostasis for plant growth and development as well as for directing plant responses to pathogens (Dangl et al., 1996). Compared to the other lesion mimic mutants tested the nec8 plants display the most severe necrotic symptoms and growth defects. The growth defects of nec8 mutants together with increased transcript expression of HR and defence-related genes (Rostoks et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2009; Table 2) suggests that nec8 may be a constitutively activated defence mutation.

nec9 mutations had contrasting effects on symptom expression caused by each fungus, showing no effect on O. yallundae development, reducing the size of F. culmorum lesions but increasing RLS symptom expression (Figs 1A, 3). The lesion mimic phenotype of nec9 mutants resulted in more chlorotic leaves with fewer necrotic spots than either the nec1 or nec8 lines (Supplementary Fig. S1). No obvious symptom on the stem was observed which might be why no effect on development of O. yallundae, a stem-base pathogen, was detected. Leaves of nec9 plants had low relative chlorophyll measurements compared to wild-type, as expected given their chlorotic phenotype (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, they did not exhibit a reduced rate of dark-induced senescence compared to the Steptoe parent line. Leaf senescence has been implicated in the pathology of both Fusarium spp. and R. collo-cygni and in both cases accelerated senescence is associated with promotion of disease (Schützendübel et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2009). Therefore it is unlikely that altered senescence is responsible for the difference in symptom development caused by these two pathogens in nec9 mutants.

The nec1 mutations reduced symptom development caused by R. collo-cygni (Figs 1A, 2A, 5A) and F. culmorum (Figs 3B, 6A) but not by the stem base infecting O. yallundae (Fig. 3A). NEC1 is predicted to encode a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC) 4 protein (Rostok et al., 2006) based on sequence similarity with its A. thaliana orthologue, HLM1, which has been proposed as an essential signalling component common to both the HR and disease resistance responses (Balague et al., 2003). The reduction in disease development caused by F. culmorum and R. collo-cygni may be associated with the accelerated onset of cell death in nec1 mutants. R. collo-cygni has a prolonged endophytic phase before becoming necrotrophic although the cues for this transition are currently not understood (Walters et al., 2008). Prevention of cell death in DELLA gain-of-function (GOF) barley mutants resulted in enhanced RLS symptom formation whereas disease levels were significantly reduced in DELLA loss-of-function (LOF) mutants that exhibit enhanced cell death. This suggests that RLS symptom development is reduced when the host has an enhanced propensity to initiate cell death (Saville et al., 2012) as is observed here in the nec1 mutant (Fig. 6B, C).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Effect of the mlo-5 mutation on Fusarium culmorum lesion formation and lesion mimic development in nec1 mutant plants. (A) F. culmorum development was assessed by measuring the diameter of the lesion on the leaf. (B) Images of lesion mimic development on (i) NEC1+MLO [G10-30/Parkland; parent line], (ii) nec1+MLO [G10-29/ GSHO1284], (iii) NEC1+MLO [G10-34], (iv) nec1+MLO [G10-32], (v) NEC1+mlo-5 [G10-36], (vi) nec1+mlo-5 [G10-31]. (C) Lesion mimic development in each of the different lines in (B) was assessed as a proportion of the leaf area covered with necrotic spots using ImageJ software.

Although the nec1 mutants exhibited reduced RLS symptoms (Fig. 5A) there was no effect on fungal biomass (Fig. 5B) suggesting that NEC1 may be involved in the regulation of the transition from endophyte to necrotroph rather than restricting growth of the R. collo-cygni fungus (see Fig. 8). F. culmorum is a hemibiotroph that has a short biotrophic phase (Scherm et al., 2013) that is likely to occur during colonization of the cereal ear tissue as observed for the related species F. graminearum (Brown et al., 2010). To date there is no evidence to suggest there is a biotrophic phase during foliar infections. Wounding the leaf during the inoculation process may enable the fungus to begin necrotrophic development immediately. If a biotrophic phase does occur during F. culmorum leaf infection it is conceivable that the mechanisms that result in lesion mimic formation also function in resistance towards this stage of pathogen development. However, the DELLA GOF and LOF mutants showed opposite effects on F. graminearum symptom development compared to R. collo-cygni (Saville et al., 2012) indicating that enhanced cell death promotes Fusarium symptoms. The negative effect of nec1 on both RLS and Fusarium symptom development compared to the contrasting effects of DELLA (Saville et al., 2012) and mlo mutations (Supplementary Fig. S2) on these diseases suggests that specific pathogens may be affected differentially by distinct cell death pathways (discussed below). Alternatively NEC1 may regulate other pathways that confer disease resistance. The nec1 mutation increases endogenous auxin levels whilst enhancing stomatal closure (Keisa et al., 2013). Application of auxin can prime cereal plants for resistance against F. culmorum (Petti et al., 2012) whereas airborne R. collo-cygni spores germinate on leaves and penetrate through stomata (Stabentheiner et al., 2009). These alternative effects of nec1 on barley may explain why these mutants are resistant to F. culmorum and R. collo-cygni independent of cell death.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Effect of the mlo-5 mutation on Ramularia leaf spot (RLS) development in nec1 mutant plants. (A) Disease symptom expression presented as the area under disease progress curve of RLS (B) R. collo-cygni DNA in leaves of lesion mimic mutants. *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01.

Fig 8.

Fig 8.

A hypothesis for the joint effect of NEC1 and MLO on various pathogenic fungi and cell death. The model is based on the following data: nec1-dependent cell death (CD) [1, 8] Fig. 6B, C; effect of nec1 on Fusarium colonisation [7] Fig. 6a; effect of mlo-5 on nec1-dependent traits [3, 5] Fig. 6; mlo-dependent stimulation of Ramularia collo-cygni (Rcc) fungus [4] and Ramularia leaf spot (RLS) symptoms [3, 11] Fig. 5, McGrann et al. (2014), Brown & Makepeace (2009); suppression of RLS [6, 11] but not Rcc growth [12] in nec1+MLO plants, Fig. 5; mlo-dependent mildew resistance [3, 9] Jørgensen (1992), Büschges et al. (1997); mlo-dependent CD [3, 10] Peterhänsel et al. (1997). Traits enhanced by ROR genes [2] are mildew resistance [10] (Freialdenhoven et al., 1996; Collins et al., 2003), mlo-dependent CD [11] (Peterhänsel et al., 1997), RLS [12] (McGrann et al., 2014), and Fusarium colonisation (Fig. 7; ROR1 tested but not ROR2). Growth of Rcc is not affected by ROR genes (McGrann et al., 2014). The Reg-nec1 and Reg-mlo components are hypothetical, as are the effects of nec1-dependent CD on Fusarium [13] (Fig. 6) and mildew [14] (Keisa et al., 2011). See Discussion and Supplementary Fig. S3 for detailed description of the model.

NEC1 has a complex interaction with the MLO gene. Fig. 8 presents a hypothesis to account for the phenotypes controlled by these genes, including the data in Figs 5, 6 and 7 as well as previously published data. Together, these data indicate that rather than operating through a linear relationship, the interaction between MLO and NEC1 is a dynamic two-way process with outcomes that are specific to the particular pathogen. There may be a central role for a process by which the regulatory mechanisms controlled by NEC1 and MLO suppress each other under normal conditions.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Effect of ror1-2 mutation on Fusarium culmorum lesion formation. F. culmorum development was assessed by measuring the diameter of the lesion on the leaf. ** P <0.01.

Comparing plants with the NEC1, MLO and nec1 MLO genotypes, the nec1 mutation increases cell death (Fig. 6B, C; [1, 8] in Fig. 8) and reduces colonization by F. culmorum (Fig. 6a; [7]). Whether nec1-dependent cell death contributes to suppressing F. culmorum lesions [13] or the two traits are separate effects is not yet known, so they are shown as possibly independent in Fig. 8.

Comparing NEC1 MLO and NEC1 mlo-5 plants, mlo-5 increased both the growth of R. collo-cygni (Fig. 5B; [4]) and expression of RLS symptoms (Fig. 5A; [12]), as in previous work (Brown & Makepeace, 2009; McGrann et al., 2014). Development of RLS symptoms does not depend solely on infection by R. collo-cygni and other factors determine whether or not the disease appears in infected leaves (McGrann et al., 2014; [3, 11]). In contrast to their effects on RLS, loss-of-function mlo alleles confer strong resistance to powdery mildew (Jørgensen, 1992; Büschges et al., 1997; [3, 9]). Spontaneous cell death and necrotic flecks can appear in mlo plants (Wolter et al., 1993; Büschges et al., 1997; [3, 10]) but few such lesions appeared in our experiments and there was no significant difference between amounts of flecking on mlo-5 and MLO plants (Fig. 6B, C; also unpublished observations on near-isogenic lines bred from cvv. Ingrid, Pallas, Haisa and Malteria Heda). Hence control of the necrotic flecking pathway in mlo-5 plants is at least partly separate from the nec1-dependent lesion-mimic pathway. It is sensitive to environmental conditions and can be associated with mildew-resistance and RLS-susceptibility but is not required for these disease phenotypes. We propose that there may be a common regulatory mechanism, marked ‘Reg-mlo’ in Fig. 8. This is repressed by wild-type MLO [3], suppresses mildew [9], promotes RLS symptoms [11] and enhances cell death in certain environments [10].

The Fusarium-susceptible phenotype without necrotic lesions in NEC1 plants is independent of the plant’s allele at the MLO locus (Fig. 6; Supplementary Fig. S2). In nec1 plants, by contrast, functional MLO is required for full expression of both cell death [8] and Fusarium-resistance [7] (Fig. 6; [3, 5]). As nec1 is a loss-of-function mutation, MLO presumably interacts with a hypothetical regulator, labelled ‘Reg-nec1’ in Fig. 8, which is strongly repressed by NEC1 [1] and is therefore stimulated in the nec1 genotype, rather than by NEC1 itself. The reason for proposing that MLO influences the nec1-dependent pathway indirectly via an interaction between ‘Reg-mlo’ and ‘Reg-nec1’ is based on the effect of the ror1-2 mutation on Fusarium colonization (see below).

The effect of nec1 on RLS is complex because it depends on the allele at the MLO locus. It was associated with reduced RLS symptoms in MLO plants but with increased RLS in mlo-5 hosts (Fig. 5A) although it did not alter amounts of R. collo-cygni in the leaf significantly in either case (Fig. 5B). This is further evidence that factors in addition to the presence of the pathogen affect the etiology of RLS (McGrann et al., 2014). These contrasting effects may be explained by mutual inhibition of the nec1-dependent and mlo-5-dependent pathways. In nec1 MLO plants, ‘Reg-mlo’ is repressed by MLO [3]. ‘Reg-nec1’ is enhanced by the loss of NEC1 function [1], which further represses ‘Reg-mlo’ [6]. The outcome of the interaction between the pathways is that nec1 MLO plants are even less susceptible to RLS [11] than NEC1 MLO plants. In nec1 mlo-5 plants, the absence of MLO protein causes repression of ‘Reg-mlo’ to be lifted [3], so the higher concentration of ‘Reg-mlo’ leads to increased repression of ‘Reg-nec1’ [5]. The lower level of ‘Reg-nec1’ then causes the level of ‘Reg-mlo’ to be higher than in NEC1 mlo-5 plants, so that nec1 mlo-5 plants are highly susceptible to RLS [11]. Moreover, the loss of MLO stimulates growth of the R. collo-cygni fungus [12]. Note that the proposed ‘Reg-nec1’ and ‘Reg-mlo’ entities are hypothetical mechanisms but their existence is required to account for the interacting effects of NEC1 and MLO on diverse traits. They may be, for example, proteins (or sets of proteins) that inhibit one another, signalling pathways that act in opposition to one another, or conflicting physiological states within the leaf tissue.

The nec1 mutation also reduces susceptibility to mildew in the MLO genotype (Keisa et al., 2011). This is not explained by the effect of ‘Reg-nec1’ on ‘Reg-mlo’. Instead, it could result from necrotic lesions that reduce susceptibility to B. graminis, an obligate biotroph [14].

The complexity of the links between NEC1 and MLO is further indicated by the role that ROR genes play in traits affected by their interaction. ROR1 and ROR2 act in opposition to many of the functions of MLO although they may not interact with MLO directly (Collins et al., 2003). They are required for full expression of several traits: resistance to mildew (Collins et al., 2003), which is particularly striking in mlo plants (Freialdenhoven et al., 1996), suppression of mlo-dependent cell death (Peterhänsel et al., 1997) and development of RLS (McGrann et al., 2014). They do not, however, significantly alter R. collo-cygni DNA levels in infected leaves (McGrann et al., 2014). The effect of ror mutants on RLS but not R. collo-cygni is therefore similar to that of nec1 (Figs 1, 2, 5), suggesting that both ROR proteins, NEC1 and MLO are all required for full activity of the ‘Reg-mlo’ mechanism. ROR1 is also required for full expression of susceptibility to Fusarium (Fig. 7), which, like R. collo-cygni, is a non-biotrophic pathogen. The simplest way in which the ROR proteins could have all the effects observed on both nec1-dependent and mlo-dependent traits would be if they enhanced the effect of ‘Reg-mlo’, the protein or process which is inhibited by MLO [2]. The effects of the nec1 and mlo mutations, separately and jointly, and of the ror1-2 mutation combined with mlo-5 on all six biotic and abiotic syndromes discussed here are summarized in Fig. 8 and Supplementary Fig. S3.

Control of host cell death has been proposed as one of the mechanisms by which compatibility in cereals against biotrophic and facultative fungal pathogens is differentially regulated (Saville et al., 2012). As observed in this study the contribution of cell death to plant defence appears diverse even to fungi with similar lifestyles. Subtle alterations to the signalling cascades that define the cell death programme may result in differences in pathogen perception or defence signalling. Alternatively altered cell death pathways may change or eliminate the specific host cues that are required by particular fungi to trigger switches in life habits leading to a spectrum of responses to facultative pathogens.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data can be found at JXB online.

Supplementary Table S1. qRT-PCR primers used in this study.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Lesion mimic and Ramularia leaf spot infection phenotypes on leaves of Steptoe, nec1 (FN085), nec8 (FN303) and nec9 (FN227, FN364, FN450) mutant plants.

Supplementary Fig. S2. Effects of independent mlo mutations in different barley genetic backgrounds on Fusarium culmorum lesion development.

Supplementary Fig. S3. A proposed network of interaction between NEC1 and MLO and their effects on several traits.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Andris Kleinhofs and Nils Rostoks for seeds of the different mutant lines used in this study. We thank Andrew Davis for taking high quality photographs, Lisa McGrann for technical assistance and Henk-jan Schoonbeek and Ben Miller for useful discussions. This research was supported by BBSRC, RESAS, AHDB-HGCA and a consortium of 10 companies (BASF, Bayer, KWS, Lantmännen, Limagrain, LS, Saaten-Union, Secobra, Sejet, Syngenta) through Sustainable Arable LINK, and grant BB/J004553/1 from BBSRC and the John Innes Foundation.

References

  1. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Balague C, Lin B, Alcon C, Flottes G, Malmström S, Köhler C, Neuhaus G, Pelletier G, Gaymard F, Roby D. 2003. HLM1, an essential signaling component in the hypersensitive response, is a member of the cyclic nucleotide gated channel ion channel family. The Plant Cell 15, 365–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blein M, Levrel A, Lemoine J, Gautier V, Chevalier M, Barloy D. 2009. Oculimacula yallundae lifestyle revisited: relationships between the timing of eyespot symptom appearance, the development of the pathogen and the responses of infected partially resistant wheat plants. Plant Pathology 58, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown JKM, Makepeace JC. 2009. The effect of genetic variation in barley on responses to Ramularia collo-cygni . Aspects of Applied Biology 92, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown NA, Urban M, Van De Meene AML, Hammond-Kosack KE. 2010. The infection biology of Fusarium graminearum: defining the pathways of spikelet to spikelet colonisation in wheat ears. Fungal Biology 114, 555–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Büschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R, et al. 1997. The barley mlo gene: A novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88, 695–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman NH, Burt C, Dong H, Nicholson P. 2008. The development of PCR-based markers for the selection of eyespot resistance genes Pch1 and Pch2 . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117, 425–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen X, Steed A, Travella S, Keller B, Nicholson P. 2009. Fusarium graminearum exploits ethylene signalling to colonize dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. New Phytologist 182, 975–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colebrook EH, Creissen G, McGrann GRD, Dreos R, Lamb C, Boyd LA. 2012. Broad-spectrum acquired resistance in barley induced by the Pseudomonas pathosystem shares transcriptional components with Arabidopsis systemic acquired resistance. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 25, 658–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins NC, Thordal-Christensen H, Lipka V, et al. 2003. SNARE-protein-mediated disease resistance at the plant cell wall. Nature 425, 973–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dangl JL, Dietrich RA, Richberg MH. 1996. Death don’t have no mercy: cell death programs in plant-microbe interactions. The Plant Cell 8, 1793–1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Freialdenhoven A, Peterhansel C, Kurth J, Kreuzaler F, Schulze-Lefert P. 1996. Identification of genes required for the function of non-race-specific mlo resistance to powdery mildew in barley. Plant Cell 8, 5–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Glazebrook J. 2005. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43, 205–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hammond-Kosack KE, Parker JE. 2003. Deciphering plant-pathogen communication: fresh perspectives for molecular resistance breeding. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14, 177–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Havis ND, Brown JKM, Clemente G, et al. 2015. Ramularia collo-cygni—an emerging pathogen of barley crops. Phytopathology doi 10.1094/PHYTO-11-14-0337-FI [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Havis ND, Nyman N, Oxley SJP. 2014. Evidence for seed transmission and asymptomatic growth of Ramularia collo-cygni in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Plant Pathology 63, 929–936. [Google Scholar]
  17. Heller J, Tudzynski P. 2011. Reactive oxygen species in phytopathogenic fungi: signaling, development, and disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 49, 369–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jansen C, von Wettstein D, Schafer W, Kogel KH, Felk A, Maier FJ. 2005. Infection patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 16892–16897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jarosch B, Kogel KH, Schaffrath U. 1999. The ambivalence of the barley Mlo locus: mutations conferring resistance against powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp, hordei) enhance susceptibility to the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea . Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 12, 508–514. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones AM. 2001. Programmed cell death in development and defense. Plant Physiology 125, 94–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jörgensen JH. 1992. Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63, 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamlofski CA, Antonelli E, Bender C, Jaskelioff M, Danna CH, Ugalde R, Acevedo A. 2007. A lesion mimic mutant of wheat with enhanced resistance to leaf rust. Plant Pathology 56, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  24. Keisa A, Kanberga-Silina K, Nakurte I, Kunga L, Rostoks N. 2011. Differential disease resistance response in the barley necrotic mutant nec1 . BMC Plant Biology 11, 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Keisa A, Nakurte I, Kunga L, Kale L, Rostoks N. 2013. Increased auxin content and altered auxin response in barley necrotic mutant nec1 . In: Advance in Barley Sciences: Proceedings of 11th International Barley Genetics Symposium . Dordrecht: Springer, 229–241. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kjaer B, Jensen HP, Jensen J, Jörgensen JH. 1990. Associations between 3 ml-o powdery mildew resistance genes and agronomic traits in barley. Euphytica 46, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar J, Huckelhoven R, Beckhove U, Nagarajan S, Kogel KH. 2001. A compromised Mlo pathway affects the response of barley to the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana (Teleomorph: Cochliobolus sativus) and its toxins. Phytopathology 91, 127–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lorrain S, Vailleau F, Balaque C, Roby D. 2003. Lesion mimic mutants: keys for deciphering cell death and defense pathways in plants? Trends in Plant Science 8, 263–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma W, Berkowitz GA. 2011. Ca2+ conduction by plant cyclic nucleotide gated channels and associated signaling components in pathogen defense signal transduction cascades. New Phytologist 190, 566–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Makepeace JC, Havis ND, Burke JI, Oxley SJP, Brown JKM. 2008. A method of inoculating barley seedlings with Ramularia collo-cygni . Plant Pathology 57, 991–999. [Google Scholar]
  31. McGrann GRD, Steed A, Burt C, Goddard R, LaChaux C, Bansal A, Corbitt M, Gorniak K, Nicholson P, Brown JKM. 2015. Contribution of the drought tolerance-related Stress-responsive NAC 1 transcription factor to resistance of barley to Ramularia leaf spot. Molecular Plant Pathology 16, 201–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McGrann GRD, Stavrinides A, Russell J, Corbitt MM, Booth A, Chartrain L, Thomas WT, Brown JKM. 2014. A trade off between mlo resistance to powdery mildew and increased susceptibility of barley to a newly important disease, Ramularia leaf spot. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 1025–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McGrann GRD, Townsend BJ, Antoniw JF, Asher MJC, Mutasa-Göttgens ES. 2009. Barley elicits a similar early basal defence response during host and non-host interactions with Polymyxa root parasites. European Journal of Plant Pathology 123, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mengiste T. 2012. Plant immunity to necrotrophs. Annual Review of Phytopathology 50, 267–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moeder W, Urquhart W, Ung H, Yoshioka K. 2011. The role of cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels in plant immunity. Molecular Plant 4, 442–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moeder W, Yoshioka K. 2008. Lesion mimic mutants: a classical, yet still fundamental approach to study programmed cell death. Plant Signaling & Behavior 3, 764–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nurnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L. 2004. Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunological Reviews 198, 249–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM. 2009. GenStat for Windows (12th Edition) Introduction . Hemel Hempstead: VSN International. [Google Scholar]
  39. Peraldi A, Griffe LL, Burt C, McGrann GRD, Nicholson P. 2014. Brachypodium distachyon exhibits compatible interactions with Oculimacula spp. and Ramularia collo-cygni, providing the first pathosystem model to study eyespot and ramularia leaf spot diseases. Plant Pathology 63, 554–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Persson M, Falk A, Dixelius C. 2009. Studies on the mechanism of resistance to Bipolaris sorokiniana in the barley lesion mimic mutant bst1 . Molecular Plant Pathology 10, 587–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Persson M, Rasmussen M, Falk A, Dixelius C. 2008. Barley mutants with enhanced level of resistance to Swedish isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana, casual agent of spot blotch. Plant Breeding 127, 639–643. [Google Scholar]
  42. Peterhänsel C, Freialdenhoven A, Kurth J, Kolsch R, Schulze-Lefert P. 1997. Interaction analyses of genes required for resistance responses to powdery mildew in barley reveal distinct pathways leading to leaf cell death. Plant Cell 9, 1397–1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Petti C, Reiber K, Ali SS, Berney M, Doohan FM. 2012. Auxin as a player in the biocontrol of Fusarium head blight disease of barley and its potential as a disease control agent. BMC Plant Biology 12, 224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Piffanelli P, Zhou FS, Casais C, Orme J, Jarosch B, Schaffrath U, Collins NC, Panstruga R, Schulze-Lefert P. 2002. The barley MLO modulator of defense and cell death is responsive to biotic and abiotic stress stimuli. Plant Physiology 129, 1076–1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rostoks N, Schmierer D, Kudrna D, Kleinhofs A. 2003. Barley putative hypersensitive induced reaction genes: genetic mapping, sequence analyses and differential expression in disease lesion mimic mutants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 1094–1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rostoks N, Schmierer D, Mudie S, Drader T, Brueggeman R, Caldwell DG, Waugh R, Kleinhofs A. 2006. Barley necrotic locus nec1 encodes the cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 4 homologous to the Arabidopsis HLM1. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 275, 159–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saville RJ, Gosman N, Burt CJ, Makepeace J, Steed A, Corbitt M, Chandler E, Brown JKM, Boulton MI, Nicholson P. 2012. The ‘Green Revolution’ dwarfing genes play a role in disease resistance in Triticum aestivum and Hordeum vulgare . Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 1271–1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Scherm B, Balmas V, Spanu F, Pani G, Delogu G, Pasquali M, Migheli Q. 2013. Fusarium culmorum: causal agent of foot and root rot and head blight on wheat. Molecular Plant Pathology 14, 323–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schützendübel A, Stadler M, Wallner D, von Tiedemann A. 2008. A hypothesis on physiological alterations during plant ontogenesis governing susceptibility of winter barley to ramularia leaf spot. Plant Pathology 57, 518–526. [Google Scholar]
  50. Scott PR. 1971. The effect of temperature on eyespot (Cercosporella herpotrichoides) in wheat seedlings. Annals of Applied Biology 68, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  51. Shagimardanova EI, Gusev OA, Sychev VN, Levinskikh MA, Sharipova MR, Il’inskaya ON, Bingham G, Sugimoto M. 2010. Expression of stress response genes in barley Hordeum vulgare in a spaceflight environment. Molecular Biology 44, 734–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stabentheiner E, Minihofer T, Huss H. 2009. Infection of barley by Ramularia collo-cygni: scanning electron microscopic investigations. Mycopathologia 168, 135–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor JMG, Paterson LJ, Havis ND. 2010. A quantitative real-time PCR assay for the detection of Ramularia collo-cygni from barley (Hordeum vulgare). Letters in Applied Microbiology 50, 493–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology 3, research 0034.0031-0034.0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Walters DR, Havis ND, Oxley SJP. 2008. Ramularia collo-cygni: the biology of an emerging pathogen of barley. Fems Microbiology Letters 279, 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wolter M, Hollricher K, Salamini F, Schulze-Lefert P. 1993. The mlo resistance alleles to powdery mildew infection in barley trigger a developmentally controlled defense mimic phenotype. Molecular and General Genetics 239, 122–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wright SA, Azarang M, Falk AB. 2013. Barley lesion mimics, supersusceptible or highly resistant to leaf rust and net blotch. Plant Pathology 62, 982–992. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. 1974. Decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang L, Lavery L, Gill U, Gill K, Steffenson B, Yan GP, Chen XM, Kleinhofs A. 2009. A cation/proton-exchanging protein is a candidate for the barley NecS1 gene controlling necrosis and enhanced defense response to stem rust. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118, 385–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES