Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2010 Oct 25;1(1-6):47–62. doi: 10.1007/s12645-010-0006-0

Evaluation of cytotoxicity and mechanism of apoptosis of doxorubicin using folate-decorated chitosan nanoparticles for targeted delivery to retinoblastoma

Suphiya Parveen 1, Sanjeeb K Sahoo 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4452076  PMID: 26069479

Abstract

Nanoparticles are the new entities that can greatly limit the various side effects of systemic chemotherapy, and that coupled with a targeting moiety enables site-specific delivery of drugs. Folate receptors are overexpressed in retinoblastoma cells, thus these can specifically uptake the drug-loaded nanoparticles, thereby increasing the cytotoxicity at the tumor site. In our work, doxorubicin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles was prepared and then conjugated to folic acid. The conjugation efficiency was characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Thereafter, the efficacy of FA-conjugated DOX-CNPs on retinoblastoma cells (Y-79) was analyzed by MTT assay which demonstrated superior cytotoxic effects as compared to unconjugated DOX-CNPs and native DOX. This may be due to enhanced intracellular uptake of DOX-CNPs-FA (30%) than that of DOX-CNPs (13.24%) and native DOX (5.01%), resulting from the high affinity of FA for folate receptors. Finally, the mechanism of doxorubicin-mediated apoptosis in retinoblastoma cell line (Y-79) was investigated which demonstrated that the mitochondrial pathway is activated and that the FA-conjugated DOX-CNPs are most effective and causes enhanced release of cytochrome c as well as the activation of downstream caspases to assist in apoptosis. Thus, the FA-targeted NPs were proved to possess sustainable, controlled, and targeted delivery of anticancer drugs with DOX as a model drug, which may provide a drug delivery system of precise control and targeting effect for the treatment of retinoblastoma.

Keywords: Nanoparticles, Chitosan, Folic acid, Doxorubicin, Retinoblastoma, Targeted drug delivery

Introduction

Cancer is a debilitating disease that causes millions of death each year. Though chemotherapeutics do exist to combat cancer, one of the most serious issues is the nonselective nature of the chemotherapeutic drugs, which causes innumerable side effects (Parveen and Sahoo 2008). Thus, realizing the importance of targeted drug delivery specifically to the site of action is the need of the hour. Retinoblastoma is one such cancer that causes serious malignant intraocular tumor in infants and children and often results in loss of vision and secondary malignancies (Abramson 1990; Smith and Donaldson 1991). Recent treatment options for retinoblastoma include external beam radiotherapy, episcleral plaque radiotherapy, and cryotherapy (Amendola et al. 1989), but these are frequently associated with complications, such as facial deformities, cataract, radiation retinopathy, and a substantial risk of secondary tumors (Abramson and Frank 1998). Systemic chemotherapy is also limited by toxicity, rapid blood clearance, and multi-drug resistance (Chan et al. 1989). Moreover, ocular drug delivery is also impaired due to the natural defensive barriers of the retina that protect the eye. Thus, targeting it in a safe and effecting manner would be helpful to the majority of children diagnosed with retinoblastoma, especially in developing countries where the probability of survival is closer to 50% due to poor education, lower socioeconomic status and inadequate healthcare systems, which results in delayed diagnosis and suboptimal care (Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2008).

Nanoparticles (NPs) are promising entities that can greatly reduce the problems due to drug delivery and retention. These are submicron-sized polymeric colloidal particles, with diameters ranging from 10 to 1,000 nm, in which the therapeutic agent of interest can be encapsulated within the polymeric matrix or adsorbed or conjugated onto the surface (Parveen and Sahoo 2008; Sahoo and Labhasetwar 2003; Sahoo et al. 2007). Chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) are especially suitable for ocular drug delivery due to their mucoadhesiveness and ability to cross the tight epithelial junctions, thus increasing the residence time of the drug (Calvo et al. 1997b; de Campos et al. 2001; Genta et al. 1997). Moreover, these NPs can be surface functionalized by specific ligands to achieve targeted drug delivery to the tumor site, thus improving the therapeutic efficacy and reducing the side effects of chemotherapy. Several studies have shown that folic acid (FA) is an attractive targeting moiety for cancer therapy due to its high affinity for folate receptors (Kd ∼ 10−10 M; Leamon and Reddy 2004; Lu and Low 2003; Lu et al. 2004). Folate receptors are overexpressed in the membrane of many human cancer cells such as brain, kidney, breast, lung, retinoblastoma, etc. (Kansara et al. 2008; Saul et al. 2003; Sudimack and Lee 2000) and the expression level of folate receptor in tumors is around 100–300 times higher than in normal tissues (Ross et al. 1994). Thus, because of this distinguishing property, FA has emerged as an appropriate targeting ligand and can be exploited in designing a suitable convey system that can specifically deliver the drug pay load at the therapeutic site.

In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of folate-decorated chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs-FA) for targeted delivery of hydrophilic anticancer drugs with doxorubicin (DOX), chosen as the model drug, as it is widely used chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of retinoblastoma (Serpe et al. 2006). The drug-loaded CNPs (DOX-CNPs) were prepared and decorated with folic acid (DOX-CNPs-FA), which was then characterized by various analytical techniques such as laser light scattering for particle’s size, zeta potential analyzer for surface charge, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) for surface chemistry. Thereafter, comparative analysis of intracellular uptake of drug and drug-loaded CNPs (conjugated and unconjugated nanoparticles) on retinoblastoma cells (Y-79) was carried out to access the specificity of the folate receptors and to ascertain whether nanoparticles are taken up more than the native drug. The therapeutic effect of doxorubicin formulated in the CNPs (with folate targeting effect) was also evaluated in vitro by measuring the viability and the extent of apoptosis of human retinoblastoma cells (Y-79). Furthermore, the DOX-mediated apoptotic pathway was investigated wherein the effects of various formulations on the kinetics of cytochrome c release, mitochondrial membrane potential, and activation of various downstream caspases were analyzed by western blotting.

Materials and methods

Materials

Chitosan (60–90 kDa, degree of deacetylation = 85%, derived from crab shells, in the form of fibrillar flakes), sodium triphosphate pentabasic (TPP), doxorubicin, folic acid, sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate, and potassium chloride were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Propidium iodide (PI) was obtained from Invitrogen (Leiden, The Netherlands). Potassium hydrogen phosphate and dimethyl sulfoxide were purchased from Qualigens Fine Chemicals, Mumbai. Acetonitrile was purchased from E-merk, India. Ultrapure water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used throughout. All other chemicals were of analytical grade unless where otherwise stated.

Preparation of doxorubicin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles

Doxorubicin-loaded CNPs were prepared by a modified ionic gelation method as reported by Calvo et al. (1997a, b). Briefly, 2 ml of an aqueous solution of TPP (2.91 mg/ml) was slowly added drop wise into 10 ml of chitosan solution (1.75 mg/ml, pH = 5) containing DOX (5.25 mg). After overnight stirring, the CNPs were collected by centrifugation (SIGMA 3K30, Germany) at 18,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The pellets were then dispersed in double distilled water and lyophilized (LYPHLOCK, Labconco, MO) for 48 h and then stored at 4°C for further studies.

Nanoparticle surface modification: synthesis of folate CNPs

Folate-conjugated CNPs were synthesized by coupling the freeze-dried CNPs to an activated folic acid as described in previous studies with minor modifications (Guo et al. 2000; Lee and Low 1995). Briefly, 5 mg of the freeze-dried CNPs dissolved in 5 ml of DMSO were mixed with 1.3 mg of folic acid and 1.3 mg of DCC. The reaction was performed at room temperature for 7 h and then mixed with 50 ml of distilled water and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm. The pellet was then dialyzed and dried to obtain CNPs-FA. The formation of folate-conjugated CNPs was monitored and confirmed by analyzing the concentration of conjugated folic acid in a known amount of the sample at 365 nm by a UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Synergy HT, BioTek® Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT; Yoo and Park 2004). Serially diluted concentrations of folic acid in DMSO were used to construct a calibration curve.

Characterization of doxorubicin-loaded CNPs with folate decoration

Particle size analysis and zeta potential measurement

Mean particle size and size distribution of the nanoparticles was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) and laser Doppler anemometry, respectively, using a Zetasizer (Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments, UK), with a red laser of wavelength λo = 633 nm (He-Ne, 4.0 Mw). PCS makes it possible to calculate the average diffusion coefficient (D) of the particles. Assuming that the particles are solid, the mean diameter (d) can be easily calculated by the Stokes–Einstein (Finsy 1994).

graphic file with name M1.gif

Where k is the Boltzman constant, T is the absolute temperature, and η is the viscosity of the medium. For size measurements, ∼1 mg of CNPs was dissolved in 1 ml of water which was further diluted with water and measured for a minimum of 120 s. Zeta potential measurements were made similarly with ∼1 mg of CNPs dissolved in 1 ml of water which was further diluted and placed in an electrophoretic cell, where a potential of ±150 mV was established. All the samples were maintained at a constant temperature of 25.0 ± 0.1°C in all experiments, and each batch was analyzed in triplicates.

Transmission electron microscopic studies

Particle morphology was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips CM-10, FEI Inc., Hillsboro, OR, USA). Samples (nanoparticulate suspensions, 100 μg/ml) were dropped into Formvar-coated copper grids, and after complete drying, the samples were stained using 2% w/v uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Services, Ft. Washington, PA). Image capture and analysis were done using Digital Micrograph and Soft Imaging Viewer Software.

Surface morphology

Scanning electron microscopy

The surface morphology of CNPs was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For this, CNPs were sputtered with gold to make them conductive and placed on a copper stub. The images were taken using scanning electron microscope (JSM-T220A, JEOL, MA).

Atomic force microscopy

The surface properties of the formulated CNPs were observed by an atomic force microscopy (NanoScope III A, Veeco, USA). Explorer atomic force microscope was a tapping mode, using high resonance frequency (Fo = 312 kHz), pyramidal cantilevers with silicon probes having force constants of 20 N/m. Scan speed was set at 2 Hz. The samples were dissolved in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and then dropped on freshly cleaved mica plates, followed by vacuum drying for 24 h at 25°C.

Surface chemistry

Nuclear magnetic resonance

The decoration of FA on the surface of doxorubicin-loaded CNPs was confirmed by NMR. The NMR spectra was recorded on a spectrometer (FT NMR Spectrometer, JEOL, 400 MHz, Japan) at room temperature using DMSO as a solvent (Wan et al. 2008).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

The FTIR transmission spectrum of various samples (folic acid, DOX, and DOX-CNPs-FA) was obtained from SPECTRUM RX I (Perkin Elmer, FTIR Spectrometer, USA). A total of 2% (w/w) of sample, with respect to potassium bromide (KBr), was mixed with dry KBr, and the mixture was ground into fine powder using an agate mortar before compressing into KBr disc under a hydraulic press at 10,000 psi. Each KBr disc was then scanned at 4 mm/s at a resolution of 2 cm−1 over a wave number region of 400–4,000 cm−1 using IR solution software (ver.1.10), and the characteristic peaks for different samples were recorded.

Drug encapsulation efficiency

The encapsulation efficiency (EE%) was determined by the separation of nanoparticles from the aqueous medium containing non-associated doxorubicin by centrifugation of the samples at 18,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C (SIGMA 1–15K, Germany). The supernatant was used to estimate the drug concentration which was not encapsulated in the NPs by fluorescence spectrophotometer (Synergy HT, BioTek® Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT) at λex = 485 nm and λem = 591 nm (Misra and Sahoo 2010). Doxorubicin solutions of various concentrations were prepared and similarly quantified to generate a calibration curve for the EE calculations for the doxorubicin-loaded CNPs. Triplicate samples (supernatants) were analyzed, and the doxorubicin encapsulation efficiency was calculated by dividing the amount of doxorubicin entrapped by the total amount of doxorubicin added, multiplied by 100.

In vitro release kinetics

Freeze-dried CNPs (∼5 mg) were resuspended in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated at 37°C under light agitation of 150 rpm using an incubator shaker (Wadegati Labequip, India; n = 3). At appropriate time intervals, individual samples were collected by centrifugation (SIGMA 3K30, Germany) at 18,000 rpm for 10 min, and the amount of the drug in the release medium was determined by fluorescence spectrophotometer (Synergy HT, BioTek® Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT) at λex = 485 nm and λem = 591 nm (Misra and Sahoo 2010). Calibration curves were made with the incubation medium, and all measurements were performed in triplicates.

Cell culture

Human retinoblastoma cell line (Y-79) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified 95% air/5% CO2 incubator (Hera Cell, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). All reagents for cell culture were obtained from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.

Assessment of cytotoxicity

The antiproliferative activity of doxorubicin was analyzed by the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT)-based colorimetric assay (Mosmann 1983). The MTT assay is a quantitative and rapid colorimetric method, based on the cleavage of a yellow tetrazolium salt to insoluble purple formazan crystals by the mitochondrial dehydrogenase of viable cells (Al-Joudi et al. 2005). The MTT assay was carried out according to a previously reported procedure (Sahoo and Labhasetwar 2005). Y-79 cells were seeded at 5,000 per well density in 96 well plates (Corning, NY, USA), and after 24 h, drug either as a solution or encapsulated in nanoparticles at different concentrations (0.1–100 μM/ml) was added to separate wells. Medium and void nanoparticles (without drug) served as respective controls. Medium was changed on day 2 after the treatment and then every alternate day, and no further dose of the drug was added. After the specified incubation time (5 days), 10 μl MTT (Sigma) was added, and the plates were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in a cell culture incubator (Hera Cell, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), following which the intracellular formazan crystals were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide and the color intensity measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Synergy HT, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT). The antiproliferative effect of different treatments was calculated as a percentage of cell growth with respect to respective controls.

Assessment of apoptosis by flow cytometry

Annexin V-FITC staining was used for the assessment of apoptosis. This assay is based on the observation that soon after the initiation of apoptosis, phosphotidylserine (PS) translocates from the inner face of the plasma membrane to the cell surface. The translocated PS can thus be easily detected by staining with a FITC conjugate of Annexin V, a protein that has a strong natural affinity for PS (Koopman et al. 1994). The induction of apoptosis by DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA was studied by flow cytometry. In 25 cm2 culture flasks (Corning, NY, USA), 1 × 105 cells/ml were grown overnight, after which 5 μM/ml concentration of free DOX and equivalent concentration of various formulations of DOX-loaded CNPs were added to the flasks, and the cells were incubated for 48 h in CO2 incubator (Hera Cell, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). After the specified incubation periods, the cells were washed thrice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and then resuspended in 100 μl of 1× binding buffer (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Thereafter, 5 μl Annexin V-FITC (final concentration, 1 μg/ml; BD Biosciences Pharmingen) and 5 μl propidium iodide (10 μg/μl; MP Biomedicals, Inc., Germany) were added to the cells and incubated at room temperature in dark for 20 min. Before flow cytometric analysis, 400 μl of 1× binding buffer were added to the cells and the extent of apoptosis was determined by analyzing 15,000 ungated cells using a FACScan flow cytometer and Cell Quest software (FACSCalibur; Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA).

Cell cycle distribution analysis by flow cytometry

The effects of CNPs on cell cycle progression and population distribution were determined by flow cytometry. Y-79 cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/ml in 75-cm2 flask (Corning, NY, USA), and it was treated with 5 μM/ml of DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA. Doxorubicin-induced cell cycle arrest was detected by comparing the cell cycle profiles between doxorubicin-treated cells and CNP-treated cells with that of the control cells. Forty-eight hours posttreatment, the cells were collected by centrifugation, washed thrice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) to remove any uninternalized CNPs or the native doxorubicin, and thereafter, cells were incubated in propidium iodide (20 μg/ml) for 30 min. The DNA content was measured for 15,000 events for each sample (FACS Caliber instrument; Becton, Dickinson & Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Data were plotted using CellQuest software (Becton, Dickinson & Co).

Assessment of cellular uptake

Twenty-four well plates (Corning, NY, USA) were seeded with Y-79 cells at 5 × 104 cells per well density and 24 h post-seeding, the medium in each well was replaced with 1 ml of freshly prepared suspension of DOX-CNPs and DOX-CNPs-FA in medium (300 μg/well), and the plates were incubated for 2 h as described earlier in our previous paper (Parveen et al. 2010). An equivalent concentration of doxorubicin was also added to the cells.

For folic acid competition experiments, the cells were cultured overnight with 0–3 mM folic acid prior to the addition of the particles. The experiment was terminated after 2 h by washing the cell monolayer thrice with ice-cold PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4, and lysing the cells by incubating with 0.1 ml of 1× cell lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI) for 30 min at 37°C. The cells were washed thrice and resuspended in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4). The amount of endocytosed particles inside cells was analyzed by FacsCalibur flow cytometry. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the cells at FITC-A was measured.

Confocal laser scanning microscopic studies

To study the intracellular retention of the drug, Y-79 cells were seeded in Bioptechs plates (Bioptechs, Butler, PA) at 5 × 104 cells per plate in 1 ml of growth medium 24 h prior to the experiment. Thereafter, cells were treated with 5 μM/ml of either the native drug, DOX in solution, or DOX-loaded CNPs (DOX-CNPs and DOX-CNPs-FA). Untreated cells were used as control to account for the autofluorescence, if any. The medium was changed on day 2 after the treatment and then every alternate day, and no further dose of DOX was added. At different time points, the cells were washed thrice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) to remove any uninternalized drug/CNPs and then visualized using a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Germany) that is equipped with an argon laser with an excitation wavelength set at 488 nm and emission at 590 nm (Janes et al. 2001). Detection was with a band-pass emission barrier filter. The images were processed using Leica Application Suite software.

Mitochondrial transmembrane potential

The mitochondrial membrane potential changes were analyzed by flow cytometry using a mitochondria-selective dye JC-1 (5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolcarbocyanine; Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals, Germany) (Rees et al. 1991; White and Reynolds 1996). JC-1 is a lipophilic cation, which in normal polarized mitochondria exists as aggregates. Depolarization due to loss of mitochondrial membrane potential causes the aggregates to dissolute into the monomeric forms. Thus, JC-1 forms either J-aggregates or monomers, depending on the state of the mitochondrial membrane potential, with the missions of the two dye forms detectable by flow cytometry at 585 (FL2) or 530 nm (FL1), respectively (Cossarizza et al. 1993). For the JC-1 analysis, cells (2 × 105) were treated with 5 μM/ml of native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA for 48 h at 37°C. Thereafter, the cells were collected by centrifugation, washed thrice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) to remove any uninternalized CNPs or the native doxorubicin, and thereafter, cells were stained with JC-1 for 15 min at 37°C, washed thrice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4), and analyzed for changes in membrane potential by FACScan flow cytometer and Cell Quest software (FACSCalibur; Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA). All experiments were performed in triplicates.

Determination of cytochrome c release by western blot analysis

Cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions were analyzed for cytochrome c content by immunoblotting. Briefly, Y-79 cells (1 × 106) were treated with 5 μM/ml of native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA for different time intervals (2, 24, and 48 h) at 37°C. Thereafter, cells were harvested and washed thrice with cold PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and sedimented by centrifugation. Cell fractionization was performed as described by the group of Bialik et al. (1999). The cell pellet was resuspended in digitonin lysis buffer (75 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 250 mM sucrose, 190 μg/ml digitonin; 150 μl/100-mm dish) and incubated on ice for 5 min. The cells were centrifuged (SIGMA 3K30, Germany) for 5 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C, and 1.5 μl of protease inhibitor (Protease Inhibitor Mixture Set I, Calbiochem) was added. The pellet was then resuspended in 80 μl of radioimmune precipitation buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS in phosphate-buffered saline) with protease inhibitor (1:100 dilution). Radioimmune precipitation buffer is more denaturing than NP-40 or Triton X-100 lysis buffer because it contains the ionic detergents SDS and sodium deoxycholate as active constituents. It is particularly useful for membrane disruption. The pellet was then incubated on ice for 30 min, and then centrifuged (SIGMA 3K30, Germany) for 15 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was saved as the cytosolic fraction, whereas the pellet constituted the mitochondrial fraction.

The soluble protein concentration was determined by the Pierce BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Protein immunodetection was done by electrophoretic transfer of SDS-PAGE separated proteins to PDVF membrane, incubation with primary antibody (antibodies used were against cytochrome c (Mouse monoclonal antibody, catalog no. IMG-101A, Imgenex Corporation, San Diego, USA)) and β-actin (Mouse monoclonal antibody, catalog no. sc-47778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) in 1:1,000 dilutions for 1 h at room temperature and secondary antibody (1:5,000 dilution) for 40 min at room temperature and chemiluminescent second step detection (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-mouse secondary antibodies (catalog no. 20,101) were obtained from Imgenex Corporation, San Diego, USA and used as per recommended antibody dilution of 1:5,000.

Determination of caspase activation

Y-79 cells (1 × 106) were seeded in 25 cm2 culture flasks (Corning, NY, USA) and treated with 5 μM/ml of native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA for 48 h at 37°C. Thereafter, the cells were collected, washed thrice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4), and then pelleted by centrifugation (SIGMA 3K30, Germany) at 1,000 rpm. The pellet was resuspended in radioimmune precipitation buffer, incubated on ice for 30 min, and spun for 15 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C to remove the insoluble material. Subsequently, the activities of caspase-9 and caspase-3 were determined by western blot analysis as described above. Antibodies used were against caspase-9 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, catalog no. 9502) and caspase-3 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, catalog no. 9662) in 1:1,000 dilutions from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., MA. Anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (catalog no. 20301) were obtained from Imgenex Corporation, San Diego, USA and used as per the recommended antibody dilution of 1:5,000. Both primary and secondary β-actin was used in the dilutions mentioned previously.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student’s t test. The differences were considered significant for p values of <0.05.

Results

This study shows that nanoparticulate forms of the anticancer drug doxorubicin can be specifically targeted to cancer cells in a ligand-targeted manner.

Nanoparticles characterization

Chitosan was used to formulate nanoparticles containing the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin using a modified ion gelation method. The doxorubicin loading in nanoparticles is 30% w/w with entrapment efficiency of ∼35%, suggesting that most of the doxorubicin added in the formulation is entrapped inside the nanoparticles. The drug EE of the NPs is crucial to justify their clinical applications. The particle size of these nanoparticles is ∼300 nm as determined by the particle size analyzer. This was further confirmed by TEM in which the NPs are seen to be distinct, spherical particles with solid dense structure, with a size of ∼200 nm (Fig. 1a). The nanoparticles appear to be considerably smaller as compared to the average particle size observed with the particle size analyzer, presumably arising from the dry state of the TEM measurements. The nanoparticles were further characterized by SEM. The particles were spherical with a smooth exterior as evident from SEM results (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, the surface morphology of the NPs was also analyzed by AFM which corroborated the results of SEM and confirmed that the NPs had a smooth and spherical appearance (Fig. 1c). The average zeta potential of the NPs was ∼30 mV which shows that the NPs are positively charged. Folate-conjugated CNPs also did not show a significant variation in the size and zeta potential values.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Physicochemical characterization of CNP-FA. a Transmission electron micrograph. b Scanning electron microscopic images. c AFM images of CNPs-FA

The conjugation of folic acid to the surface of NPs was confirmed by NMR (Fig. 2). It is apparent that the spectrum of the conjugate contains signals originating from folic acid and chitosan. The signals at 3.5–4.0 ppm are due to hydrogen bonded to the carbon atoms 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the glycopyranose unit and that at 1.9–2.0 ppm correspond to the hydrogen atoms of the methyl moieties of the acetamido groups of chitosan (Ji et al., 2009). Moreover, the signals at 6.7 and 7.6 ppm correspond to the para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) from the folate, and the signal at 8.7 ppm corresponds to the pteridine moiety proton from the folate (Kim et al. 2007). The chemical modification of NPs by folic acid also resulted in the appearance of a characteristic peak at 7.4 ppm (Wan et al. 2008). The conjugation efficiency of folic acid to CNPs as determined by UV–Visible spectrophotometer revealed that ∼0.33 mg of FA was conjugated per milligram of CNPs. The schematic representation of folic acid conjugated to chitosan is depicted in Fig. 2c.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

1H NMR spectra of a chitosan, b CNP-FA conjugate, and c schematic representation of folic acid conjugated to chitosan

The IR spectra of folic acid, doxorubicin, and DOX-CNPs-FA are shown in Fig. 3a. FTIR spectra confirmed the successful conjugation between CNPs and FA as is evident by the presence of the characteristic peaks of folic acid at ∼1,638 cm−1 (–CONH amide band II) and ∼1,546 cm−1 (–NH amide band II) in DOX-CNPs-FA. Furthermore, the absorption of amide band II at 1,638 cm−1 increased, which may be due to the formation of the amide linkage between the amino group on the CNPs and the carboxyl group of FA (Sahu et al. 2010). FTIR is also one of the best techniques to know the chemical stability of the encapsulated drug inside the NPs as is evident from studies done by our group and others (Misra and Sahoo 2010; Mundargi et al. 2007). Thus, FTIR was also done to assess the chemical stability of DOX in our nanoparticulate formulations. Native DOX showed characteristic bands due to presence of different functional groups. A band appearing at ∼3,331 cm−1 is due to O-H/N-H stretching vibrations, while those observed at ∼2,932 cm−1 is due to the C-H stretching vibration. Bands at ∼1,582 and ∼1,413 cm−1 are due to aromatic N-H bending vibrations and C-H bending vibrations, respectively. The bands at ∼1,285 and ∼1,212 cm−1 belong to C-N stretching vibrations. These distinctive bands of native DOX were also present in DOX-loaded NPs which indicated the chemical stability of DOX in the nanoparticulate formulation (Misra and Sahoo 2010). The average cumulative percent release profile of DOX from the NPs at prefixed time intervals is represented in Fig. 3b. It was apparent that DOX release in vitro showed a very rapid initial burst, and then followed by a slow release. DOX-CNPs showed biphasic release kinetics: initially a faster release profile wherein about 25% of the drug is released in 12 h and thereafter sustained release for days (∼50% of DOX was released in 7 days).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a Nanoparticle characterization by FTIR. Figure depicts FTIR spectra of (i) folic acid, (ii) doxorubicin, and (iii) DOX-CNPs-FA. b In vitro DOX release profiles from CNPs. Data represent mean ± S.D., n = 3

Effects of DOX on in vitro cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and Y-79 cell cycle progression and proliferation

To examine the antitumor activity of doxorubicin in human retinoblastoma Y-79 cells, exponentially dividing cells were treated with increasing concentrations of native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA, and the cell viability was measured. The in vitro viability of Y-79 cells after treatment with various concentrations of the different formulations is shown in Fig. 4. Though, DOX caused marked growth inhibition and significantly decreased cell viability, it was evident that the NP formulation, at all concentrations, demonstrated significant cytotoxicity versus the native drug. Moreover, the figure clearly demonstrates the targeting effect of the folate decoration on DOX-CNPs as the IC50 value decreased to 3.06 μM as compared to DOX-CNPs (10.2 μM) and native DOX (15.11 μM). As apoptosis is considered the key mechanism linked with chemotherapy-induced cell death, the extent of apoptosis was analyzed by Annexin V analysis of externalized phosphatidylserine. As evident from Fig. 5, all the CNP formulations showed greater apoptotic effect than native DOX. The extent of apoptosis was 60.2% for DOX-CNPs-FA, 38.04% for DOX-CNPs, and 16.43% for native DOX clearly indicating the efficacy of DOX-CNP-FA over other formulations. Although it was apparent that DOX was cytotoxic to Y-79 cells, the sustained growth-inhibitory effects observed by the cell viability assay indicate that DOX might also affect cell proliferation. To assess whether DOX induced growth inhibition, we evaluated the effect of native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA on cell cycle progression in Y-79 cells by flow cytometry. As evident from the enhanced G2/M phase inhibition, folate-decorated DOX-CNPs do significantly exert a greater antiproliferative effect than DOX-CNPs as well as native DOX (Fig. 6). Thus, the results demonstrate that DOX inhibits tumor cell growth by exerting greater cytotoxic effects on Y-79 cells.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity by the MTT assay. Different concentrations of doxorubicin were added either as solution or encapsulated in nanoparticles (DOX-CNPs, DOX-CNP-FA) to the wells with medium as control in Y-79 cell line. Medium was changed at 2 days and then every alternate day thereafter with no further dose of the drug added. The extent of growth inhibition was measured at 5 days by the MTT assay. Data as mean ± S.E.M., n = 6. **p < 0.005, DOX in solution versus DOX-CNPs and DOX-CNP-FA. *p < 0.05, DOX in solution versus DOX-CNPs and DOX-CNP-FA (black square—native DOX, black circle—DOX-CNPs, black triangle—DOX-CNP-FA). Void CNPs had no significant toxicity in the Y-79 cell line

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Induction of apoptosis in Y-79 cell line by native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNP-FA. Cells were treated with 5 μM of native DOX and equivalent concentrations of DOX in NPs (DOX-CNP and DOX-CNP-FA) for 48 h and were then stained with Annexin V to access the apoptotic potential by flow cytometry. Results are representative of one of three independent experiments

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry. For 48 h, 1 × 105 cells/ml were treated with 5 μM of native DOX and equivalent concentrations of DOX in NPs (DOX-CNP and DOX-CNP-FA). Thereafter, to the treated cells, 20 μg/ml of propidium iodide solution was added and incubated at room temperature in dark for 30 min before flow cytometric analysis. Cell cycle distribution was determined by analyzing 15,000 ungated cells using a FACScan flow cytometer. Content of DNA is represented on the x-axis; number of cells counted is represented on the y-axis. Results are representative of one of three independent experiments

Cellular uptake as a function of particle surface modification

As Y-79 cells have a high level of the folic acid receptor on their surface (Kansara et al. 2008), the targeting effect of folate-decorated NPs can be evaluated by investigating the cellular uptake of the NPs. The uptakes of native DOX, DOX-CNPs, and DOX-CNPs-FA by Y-79 cancer cells were studied by flow cytometry under in vitro conditions. As shown in Fig. 7a, b, flow cytometry measurements indicate that about 31.23% of the cells showed enhanced fluorescence when incubated with folate-decorated NPs, which was around sixfold greater than the native DOX (5.01%). DOX-CNPs also demonstrated significantly greater uptake (13.24%) than the native drug. To verify that the uptake is mediated via the folate receptor, a competitive experiment using different amounts of native folic acid in cell culture medium together with folate-decorated NPs was performed. As shown in Fig. 7c, the number of Y-79 cells that had internalized the FA-functionalized NPs decreased with increasing concentrations of free FA. At the highest free folic acid concentration evaluated (3 mM), the MFI value decreased around fivefold as compared to the value measured in the absence of free FA.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Cellular uptake as a function of particle surface modification a folic acid conjugation increases nanoparticle endocytosis in Y-79 cells. Y-79 cells were incubated with native DOX and nanoparticles at a dose of 300 μg/ml for 2 h and the number of Y-79 cells with the endocytosed CNPs was detected by flow cytometry. a Control. b DOX. c DOX-CNPs. d DOX-CNPs-FA. Results are representative of one of three independent experiments. b Bar graph depicts the data from Fig. 7a demonstrating the uptake efficiency of various formulations. Data as mean ± S.D., n = 3. **p < 0.005, DOX in solution versus DOX-CNPs and DOX-CNP-FA. c Competitive inhibition of DOX-CNP-FA uptake by the addition of native FA. Y-79 cells were cultured overnight with 0–3 mM of native folic acid after which the cells were left untreated (control) or incubated with 300 μg/ml of nanoparticles for 2 h. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of DOX fluorescence in the cells were measured and the value normalized to particle endocytosis of Y-79 cells. Data represent mean ± S.D., n = 3. d Time course study of intracellular retention of DOX-loaded NPs in Y-79 cells. Cells were treated with 5 μM of native DOX and equivalent concentrations of DOX in NPs (DOX-CNP and DOX-CNP-FA) in the growth medium. Cells treated with DOX in solution showed a decrease in green fluorescence intensity with incubation time, whereas DOX-CNPs demonstrated an increase with FA-conjugated CNPs demonstrating the fluorescence of the drug lasting up to 8 days. Results are representative of one of three independent experiments

Targeting effect of DOX-CNPs-FA was also investigated by using confocal laser scanning microscopy to further confirm the enhanced intracellular uptake of the folate-decorated NPs. Y-79 cells, incubated with free DOX in solution, demonstrated drug internalization within 2 h of incubation, but with increase in incubation time, the fluorescent intensity was reduced slowly. DOX-CNPs-FA-loaded nanoparticles on the other hand, were more strongly stained with clear visualization of the internalized NPs, and in addition, they showed a significant increase in fluorescence intensity with incubation time with strong fluorescence even after 8 days of treatment as compared to the native DOX (Fig. 7d). These findings are in agreement with the previous results obtained for quantitative measurement. These quantitative and qualitative results of the cellular uptake of the NPs provide strong evidence for the targeting effect of folate decoration for Y-79 cells.

Drug-induced changes in mitochondrial transmembrane potential

Mitochondrial changes, including variations in mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), are the key events during drug-mediated apoptosis (Zamzami et al. 1995). To delineate this mechanism, the lipophilic cation JC-1 was chosen as it is more specific for mitochondria than other fluorescent dyes such as DiOC6(3) or Rhodamine 123 (Ly et al. 2003; Salvioli et al. 1997), and this was used to determine whether DOX induces alterations in the Δψm. As compared to untreated cells, DOX-treated cells exhibited a dramatic decrease in the population of cells with J-aggregates (93.6%) and subsequent increase in the monomeric form (6.18%) indicating rapid depolarization of the mitochondrial membranes. The alterations in the Δψm were much more evident in the case of NP formulations, especially for the folate-decorated NPs (70.2%, JC-1 aggregates and 29.7%, JC-1 monomers) for the same concentration of drug exposure (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

DOX disrupts normal mitochondrial membrane potential. Y-79 cells were treated with 5 μM of native DOX and equivalent concentrations of DOX in NPs (DOX-CNP and DOX-CNP-FA) for 48 h and were then stained with JC-1 to access the mitochondrial transmembrane potential by flow cytometry. Results are representative of one of three independent experiments

Kinetic analysis of drug-induced mitochondrial translocation of cytochrome c

Mitochondria play an essential role in apoptosis triggered by various chemical agents (Sareen et al. 2006). Cytochrome c is normally localized in the space between the outer and inner mitochondrial membrane and is only released into the cytosol in the setting of apoptosis (Kluck et al. 1997). The mitochondrial response includes the release of cytochrome c into the cytosol where it binds to Apaf-1, allowing the recruitment of caspase-9 and the formation of an apoptosome complex, resulting in caspase-3 activation and execution of cell death (Green and Reed 1998). To determine whether DOX initiates this cell death mechanism, we tested whether it triggers the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria and the amount of cytochrome c released was examined in the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions by western blot analysis. DOX induced slight release of cytochrome c into the cytosol as early as 2 h after the treatment (Fig. 9a). In contrast, both DOX-loaded NPs induced a greater amount of cytochrome c release, the effect being more prominent in case of DOX-CNPs-FA. This may be due to the substantial loss of ψm, and as a consequence, the mitochondrial membranes are easily damaged leading to a massive leakage of cytochrome c. It was further observed that the quantity of the protein released increased with time and after 48 h, large quantities of the protein accumulated in the cytosol. Furthermore, it was observed that folate-decorated NPs were most effective in causing the release of cytochrome c at all time intervals (Fig. 9a). The temporal profile of cytosolic accumulation of cytochrome c parallels its release from the mitochondria. From these results, it was evident that DOX-induced apoptotic death is mediated by mitochondria-dependent signaling pathways in Y-79 cell line.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Open in a new tab

Western blot analysis to determine the apoptotic mechanism of doxorubicin a DOX causes cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Y-79 cells were treated with 5 μM of native DOX and equivalent concentrations of DOX in NPs (DOX-CNP and DOX-CNP-FA) for 2, 24, and 48 h. Cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions from intact cells were prepared and analyzed for cytochrome c levels by immunoblotting using an anti-cytochrome c antibody. Samples obtained from the time course of different fractions (cytosol or mitochondria) were adjusted for equal protein loading by determination of concentrations with the Bradford assay. β-actin was used as a standard for the equal loading of protein in the lanes. b DOX activates caspase-9 and caspase-3. Y-79 cultures were treated with 5 μM of native DOX and equivalent concentrations of DOX in NPs (DOX-CNP and DOX-CNP-FA) for 48 h. Thereafter, the cells were harvested and lysed at the indicated times after treatment, and the protein extracts were extracted and analyzed by western blot for the presence of activated caspase-9 and caspase-3. β-actin was used as a standard for the equal loading of protein in the lanes

Participation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 in DOX-induced apoptosis

Loss of ψm and cytochrome c release by numerous apoptotic stimuli including chemotherapeutic drugs lead to apoptosis which is executed by the linked activation of initiator (e.g., caspase-9) and effector caspases (e.g., caspase-3; Earnshaw et al. 1999). Caspase activation was assessed by western blotting after 48 h in accordance to the peak cytochrome c release, utilizing antibodies that detect both the procaspase as well as the cleaved caspase fragments. Based on these criteria, Fig. 9b shows evidence for DOX-induced activation of the initiator caspase (caspase-9) and the effector caspase (caspase-3). It was evident that all formulations caused activation of caspases, with the effects being most prominent in case of DOX-CNPs-FA, which caused greater cleavage of the procaspases into the active caspases.

Discussion

Targeting is especially relevant in case of cancer therapies, as most of the commonly used anticancer drugs have serious side effects due to non-specific actions on healthy cells. The folate receptor, which normally is expressed only at the luminal surface of polarized epithelia, has been found to be overexpressed on the surface of several cancer cells, including retinoblastoma (Kansara et al. 2008; Leamon and Low 2001; Leamon and Reddy 2004). Thus, due to this distinguishing feature between normal and cancer cells, folic acid has emerged as an attractive targeting ligand for selective delivery, and thus is used for the surface conjugation to NPs. In this paper, our goal was to prepare highly monodisperse polymeric nanoparticles with high doxorubicin loading and folate decorated on the NP surface for site-specific targeting. These NPs, in addition, may be specifically suitable for ocular drug delivery because of its excellent mucoadhesive properties and its ability to enhance the penetration of large molecules across mucosal surface (Sahoo et al. 2008).

In our studies, doxorubicin-loaded chitosan NPs of around 300 nm were synthesized and developed for the treatment of retinoblastoma (Fig. 1). These NPs were then surface conjugated with FA in order to achieve site-specific targeting. Conjugation of FA to the NP surface was confirmed by NMR and FTIR (Figs. 2 and 3a). A typical biphasic release pattern of doxorubicin from the NPs was obtained which may be due to the faster release of the surface-adsorbed drug (burst effect) and slower release thereafter, as the drug gradually diffuses from the NPs (Fig. 3b). A sustained release of the drug from the NPs is important as a continuous exposure of the tumor cells to anticancer drugs of a relatively lower but safer concentration that gives little chance for the tumor blood vessels to grow, resulting in much better efficacy and fewer side effects than intermittent chemotherapy.

Once the NPs were synthesized and characterized, the cytotoxic potential of the various formulations was determined as the efficacy of the formulations to defeat cancer cells is reflected by their cytotoxicity. A quantitative evaluation of in vitro therapeutic effect of a dosage form is IC50, which is defined as the drug concentration needed to kill 50% of the incubated cells in a designated time period. It can be calculated from the in vitro cellular viability data that judging by IC50 after the treatment, the IC50 is 15.11 μM for native DOX, 10.2 μM for DOX-CNP formulation, and 3.06 μM for folate decorated DOX-CNP formulation, which means that DOX-CNPs-FA is approximately threefold more effective than the NP formulation and approximately fivefold more effective than the native DOX (Fig. 4). It is thus clear that folate-conjugated CNPs demonstrated higher cytotoxicity than the NP formulation and native doxorubicin, which means that for the same therapeutic effect, the drug needed for the folate-conjugated CNP formulation could be much less than the NP formulation and native doxorubicin itself. Nanoparticles may be more cytotoxic than the free drug as the polymeric envelope protects the drug and prevents the drug from being degraded by the harsh in vivo environment (Panyam and Labhasetwar 2003; Torchilin 2005). In comparison, the free drug in solution is vulnerable to all such conditions and maybe degraded and as a result is not able to exert its antiproliferative effects to the maximum. Moreover, the nanoparticles form a drug depot wherein the drug is released slowly as compared to the native drug, and thus, a continuous exposure and sustained release of the drug over a period of time is more effective. This may also be the reason that both the formulations of CNPs showed greater apoptosis and enhanced cell cycle arrest than the native DOX at the same concentration, which further corroborated the results of the cytotoxicity assay (Figs. 5 and 6). The development of the CNPs formulation of DOX, thus, can enhance the therapeutic effect as well as prevent the toxic effects of the drug applied at high concentrations.

Moreover, it was evident from the various cytotoxicity assays that folate-conjugated CNPs is a better candidate for drug delivery as it provides enhanced cytotoxicity which may be due to greater cellular uptake by the folate receptors. To validate this hypothesis, the cellular uptake of the various formulations by Y-79 cells was determined in vitro to demonstrate the penetration of the CNPs into the cells and the targeting effects of the FA-decorated CNPs. Furthermore, a competitive experiment using different concentrations of FA together with DOX-CNPs-FA was performed to verify that the uptake was mediated by the FA receptor. The uptake experiments confirmed the manifold-enhanced uptake of DOX-CNPs-DOX as compared to DOX-CNPs and the native DOX (Fig. 7a, b). Besides, the inhibition of uptake of folate-decorated CNPs by free FA in a dose-dependent manner demonstrates that the particle uptake is mediated by the FA receptor (Fig. 7c). Thus, the key for the success of the targeted formulation is due to FA that conveys targeting properties to the carrier, which involves the cell–folate receptor interaction, internalization, and intracellular drug release. Though, we agree that even at a folic acid concentration of 3 mM, some internalization of the NPs occurs which may be due to the inherent ability of CNPs to enter the cells by endocytosis. Confocal microscopic studies also demonstrated greater intracellular retention of the DOX-CNPs-FA as compared to the DOX-CNPs and native DOX (Fig. 7d). Thus, the greater antiproliferative effect of DOX-loaded CNPs-FA can be very well correlated with the duration of its intracellular retention. Our experimental conclusions that FA causes ligand specific internalization and enhanced endocytosis of NPs which leads to greater cytotoxicity can also be supported by similar findings of various research groups. Folate decorated poly (lactide)–vitamin E TPGS nanoparticles for the targeted delivery of paclitaxel was synthesized by the group of Pan et al. in which they have shown the enhanced advantages of the NP formulations versus the native drug in achieving better therapeutic effect (Pan and Feng, 2008). The advantage of folate targeting was also exploited by the group of Rosenholm et al. in which they synthesized folate-conjugated porous hybrid silica nanoparticles for targeting to cancer cells. Significantly enhanced uptake of the formulated NPs by the cancer cells supports the enhanced endocytosis of the NPs by folate receptor expressing cells (Rosenholm et al. 2009). In another study by Liu et al., in which folic acid-conjugated nanoparticles of mixed lipid monolayer shell and biodegradable polymer core for targeted delivery of docetaxel was synthesized, they showed that folic acid-conjugated NPs facilitate the targeted delivery of docetaxel as well as enhanced cytotoxicity (Liu et al. 2009).

Doxorubicin is one of those cytotoxic drugs that are known to mediate apoptosis through the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway in many cancer cell lines (Guo et al. 2000; Kluza et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2010). In our studies this pathway was investigated as these studies might provide the molecular evidence of enhancement of apoptosis by the nanoparticles. As already discussed, the mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathway is initiated through the disruption of the mitochondrial membrane potential. This disruption leads to the release of cytochrome c and the formation of the apoptosome complex (cytochrome c/Apaf-1/caspase-9) and activation of the caspase cascade. The changes in mitochondrial membrane potential were analyzed by the JC-1 dye that can be used to predict the polarization state of the mitochondria. It was evident that due to the targeting effects, Y-79 cells were more sensitive to FA-conjugated NPs than the DOX-CNPs and the native DOX (Fig. 8). Due to the collapse of ψm as a result of the leakiness of the inner mitochondrial membrane, cytochrome c is released into the cytosol, which appears to precede the activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3. The temporal release profile of cytochrome c suggests that greater quantity of the protein accumulated in the cytosol after treatment with DOX-CNPs-FA (Fig. 9a). This was also followed by enhanced activation of both the caspases, which suggests its advantage over DOX-CNPs and native DOX (Fig. 9b).

The mechanism of apoptosis by doxorubicin in retinoblastoma has not been studied till date. Taken together, our results point to a general mechanism of apoptosis induction by DOX in Y-79 cells that involves a progressive loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and activation of the intrinsic mitochondrial/caspase-9 specific pathway, confirming previous findings from other groups in vivo as well as in different cancer cell lines (Childs et al. 2002; Gao et al. 2001; Kluza et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2010). In all cases, FA-decorated NPs showed superior efficacy as a drug delivery system as compared to DOX-CNPs and native DOX, which suggests that targeting of Y-79 with folic acid may play a pivotal role in increasing the therapeutic efficacy of drugs as well as decreasing the deleterious side effects by considerable reducing the dosage. Though, these carriers do hold promise as a drug delivery system for the ocular tissues, further studies are warranted to determine the in vivo efficacy of these folate-decorated DOX-CNPs for the treatment of retinoblastoma.

Conclusion

In this study, FA-conjugated and DOX-loaded CNPs are prepared and characterized for targeting the cancer cells rich in folate receptors on their surface. DOX-loaded CNPs with surface-conjugated FA, demonstrated a superior cellular uptake over non-targeted NPs due to FA receptor-mediated endocytosis, which also resulted in an increased cytotoxicity. FA-targeted CNPs also showed enhanced apoptosis and cleavage of downstream procaspases into active caspases for the augmentation of apoptosis. Thus, this work established the better efficacy of DOX-CNP-FA due to the targeting ligand (FA), and this work may pave the way for targeted therapy for the treatment of retinoblastoma via a safe drug delivery vehicle and with minimal undesirable effects. However, it should be pointed out that this is only a proof-of-concept investigation for design of FA-conjugated and drug-loaded CNPs. Further in vivo investigation should be carried out to determine the therapeutic efficacy of these CNPs.

Acknowledgments

Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi, India is acknowledged for the award of Junior Research Fellowship (JRF)/Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) to SP. Financial support to the Institute from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and research grants BT/04(SBIRI)/48/2006-PID and BT/PR7968/MED/14/1206/2006 from DBT to SKS is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abramson DH. Retinoblastoma 1990: diagnosis, treatment, and implications. Pediatr Ann. 1990;19:387–395. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19900601-08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abramson DH, Frank CM. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of bilateral retinoblastoma: a possible age effect on radiation-related risk. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:573–579. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)94006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Joudi FS, Alias IZ, Samsudin AR. The effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on viability, apoptosis, and survivin expression in MCF-7 cells. Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2005;38:323–330. doi: 10.1267/ahc.38.323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amendola BE, Markoe AM, Augsburger JJ, et al. Analysis of treatment results in 36 children with retinoblastoma treated by scleral plaque irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:63–70. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90371-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialik S, Cryns VL, Drincic A, et al. The mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is activated by serum and glucose deprivation in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 1999;85:403–414. doi: 10.1161/01.res.85.5.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calvo P, Remunan-Lopez C, Vila-Jato JL, et al. Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J Appl Polymer Sci. 1997;63:125–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970103)63:1&#x0003c;125::AID-APP13&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Calvo P, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Evaluation of cationic polymer-coated nanocapsules as ocular drug carriers. Int J Pharm. 1997;53:41–50. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(97)00083-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan HS, Canton MD, Gallie BL. Chemosensitivity and multidrug resistance to antineoplastic drugs in retinoblastoma cell lines. Anticancer Res. 1989;9:469–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Childs AC, Phaneuf SL, Dirks AJ, et al. Doxorubicin treatment in vivo causes cytochrome C release and cardiomyocyte apoptosis, as well as increased mitochondrial efficiency, superoxide dismutase activity, and Bcl-2:Bax ratio. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4592–4598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cossarizza A, Baccarani-Contri M, Kalashnikova G, et al. A new method for the cytofluorimetric analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential using the J-aggregate forming lipophilic cation 5, 5′, 6, 6′-tetrachloro-1, 1′, 3, 3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;197:40–45. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Campos AM, Sanchez A, Alonso MJ. Chitosan nanoparticles: a new vehicle for the improvement of the delivery of drugs to the ocular surface. Application to cyclosporin A. Int J Pharm. 2001;224:159–168. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00760-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Earnshaw WC, Martins LM, Kaufmann SH. Mammalian caspases: structure, activation, substrates, and functions during apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:383–424. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Finsy R. Particle sizing by quasi-elastic light scattering. Advan Colloid Interface Sci. 1994;52:79–143. doi: 10.1016/0001-8686(94)80041-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao M, Fan S, Goldberg ID, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor blocks the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis signaling in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:47257–47265. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106791200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Genta I, Conti B, Perugini P, et al. Bioadhesive microspheres for ophthalmic administration of acyclovir. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1997;49:737–742. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1997.tb06103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Green DR, Reed JC. Mitochondria and apoptosis. Science. 1998;281:1309–1312. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5381.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo W, Lee T, Sudimack JJ, et al. Receptor-specific delivery of liposomes via folate-PEG-chol. J Liposome Res. 2000;10:179–195. doi: 10.3109/08982100009029385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janes KA, Fresneau MP, Marazuela A, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles as delivery systems for doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2001;73:255–267. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00294-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ji QX, Zhong DY, Lü R, et al. In vitro evaluation of the biomedical properties of chitosan and quaternized chitosan for dental applications. Carbohydr Res. 2009;344:1297–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kansara V, Paturi D, Luo S, et al. Folic acid transport via high affinity carrier-mediated system in human retinoblastoma cells. Int J Pharm. 2008;355:210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim SL, Jeong HJ, Kim EM, et al. Folate receptor targeted imaging using poly (ethylene glycol)-folate: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22:405–411. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.3.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kluck RM, Bossy-Wetzel E, Green DR, et al. The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria: a primary site for Bcl-2 regulation of apoptosis. Science. 1997;275:1132–1136. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5303.1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kluza J, Marchetti P, Gallego MA, et al. Mitochondrial proliferation during apoptosis induced by anticancer agents: effects of doxorubicin and mitoxantrone on cancer and cardiac cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:7018–7030. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koopman G, Reutelingsperger CP, Kuijten GA, et al. Annexin V for flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on B cells undergoing apoptosis. Blood. 1994;84:1415–1420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leamon CP, Low PS. Folate-mediated targeting: from diagnostics to drug and gene delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2001;6:44–51. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(00)01594-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leamon CP, Reddy JA. Folate-targeted chemotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:1127–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee RJ, Low PS. Folate-mediated tumor cell targeting of liposome-entrapped doxorubicin in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1233:134–144. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)00235-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu Y, Li K, Pan J, et al. Folic acid conjugated nanoparticles of mixed lipid monolayer shell and biodegradable polymer core for targeted delivery of Docetaxel. Biomaterials. 2009;31:330–338. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu XD, Sun H, Liu GT. 5-Bromotetrandrine enhances the sensitivity of doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in intrinsic resistant human hepatic cancer Bel7402 cells. Cancer Lett. 2010;292:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lu Y, Low PS. Immunotherapy of folate receptor-expressing tumors: review of recent advances and future prospects. J Control Release. 2003;91:17–29. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00215-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu Y, Sega E, Leamon CP, et al. Folate receptor-targeted immunotherapy of cancer: mechanism and therapeutic potential. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:1161–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ly JD, Grubb DR, Lawen A. The mitochondrial membrane potential (deltapsi(m)) in apoptosis; an update. Apoptosis. 2003;8:115–128. doi: 10.1023/A:1022945107762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Misra R, Sahoo SK. Intracellular trafficking of nuclear localization signal conjugated nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010;39:152–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mundargi RC, Srirangarajan S, Agnihotri SA, et al. Development and evaluation of novel biodegradable microspheres based on poly(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) for controlled delivery of doxycycline in the treatment of human periodontal pocket: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Control Release. 2007;119:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pan J, Feng SS. Targeted delivery of paclitaxel using folate-decorated poly(lactide)-vitamin E TPGS nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2663–2672. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:329–347. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00228-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Parveen S, Sahoo SK. Polymeric nanoparticles for cancer therapy. J Drug Target. 2008;16:108–123. doi: 10.1080/10611860701794353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Parveen S, Mitra M, Krishnakumar S, et al. Enhanced antiproliferative activity of carboplatin-loaded chitosan–alginate nanoparticles in a retinoblastoma cell line. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3120–3131. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rees M, Smith TW, Chen LB. J-aggregate formation of a carbocyanine as a quantitative fluorescent indicator of membrane potential. Biochemistry. 1991;30:4480–4486. doi: 10.1021/bi00232a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wilson MW, Chantada G, et al. Retinoblastoma: one world, one vision. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e763–e770. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosenholm JM, Meinander A, Peuhu E, et al. Targeting of porous hybrid silica nanoparticles to cancer cells. ACS Nano. 2009;3:197–206. doi: 10.1021/nn800781r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ross JF, Chaudhuri PK, Ratnam M. Differential regulation of folate receptor isoforms in normal and malignant tissues in vivo and in established cell lines. Physiologic and clinical implications. Cancer. 1994;73:2432–2443. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940501)73:9&#x0003c;2432::AID-CNCR2820730929&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sahoo SK, Labhasetwar V. Nanotech approaches to drug delivery and imaging. Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:1112–1120. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02903-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sahoo SK, Labhasetwar V. Enhanced antiproliferative activity of transferrin-conjugated paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles is mediated via sustained intracellular drug retention. Mol Pharm. 2005;2:373–383. doi: 10.1021/mp050032z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sahoo SK, Parveen S, Panda JJ. The present and future of nanotechnology in human health care. Nanomedicine. 2007;3:20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sahoo SK, Dilnawaz F, Krishnakumar S. Nanotechnology in ocular drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sahu SK, Mallick SK, Santra S, et al. In vitro evaluation of folic acid modified carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin for targeted delivery. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:1587–1597. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-3998-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Salvioli S, Ardizzoni A, Franceschi C, et al. JC-1, but not DiOC6(3) or rhodamine 123, is a reliable fluorescent probe to assess delta psi changes in intact cells: implications for studies on mitochondrial functionality during apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 1997;411:77–82. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00669-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sareen D, van Ginkel PR, Takach JC, et al. Mitochondria as the primary target of resveratrol-induced apoptosis in human retinoblastoma cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3708–3716. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Saul JM, Annapragada A, Natarajan JV, et al. Controlled targeting of liposomal doxorubicin via the folate receptor in vitro. J Control Release. 2003;92:49–67. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00295-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Serpe L, Guido M, Canaparo R, et al. Intracellular accumulation and cytotoxicity of doxorubicin with different pharmaceutical formulations in human cancer cell lines. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6:3062–3069. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2006.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith LM, Donaldson SS. Incidence and management of secondary malignancies in patients with retinoblastoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. Oncology. 1991;5:135–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sudimack J, Lee RJ. Targeted drug delivery via the folate receptor. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000;41:147–162. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(99)00062-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Torchilin VP. Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:145–160. doi: 10.1038/nrd1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wan A, Suna Y, Li H. Characterization of folate-graft-chitosan as a scaffold for nitric oxide release. Int J Biol Macromol. 2008;43:415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. White RJ, Reynolds IJ. Mitochondrial depolarization in glutamate stimulated neurons: an early signal specific to excitotoxin exposure. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5688–5697. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-18-05688.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yoo HS, Park TG. Folate receptor targeted biodegradable polymeric doxorubicin micelles. J Control Release. 2004;96:273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zamzami N, Marchetti P, Castedo M, et al. Reduction in mitochondrial potential constitutes an early irreversible step of programmed lymphocyte death in vivo. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1661–1672. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.5.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Nanotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES