Abstract
Deposition of α-synuclein aggregates occurs widely in the central and peripheral nervous systems in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although recent evidence has suggested that cell-to-cell transmission of α-synuclein aggregates drives the progression of PD, the mechanism by which α-synuclein aggregates spread remains undefined. Here, we show that α-synuclein aggregates are perpetually transmitted through a continuous cycle involving uptake of external aggregates, co-aggregation with endogenous α-synuclein, and exocytosis of the co-aggregates. Moreover, we found that glucocerebrosidase depletion, which has previously been strongly associated with PD and increased cognitive impairment, promoted propagation of α-synuclein aggregates. These studies define how α-synuclein aggregates spread among neuronal cells and explain how glucocerebrosidase mutations increase the risk of developing PD and other synucleinopathies.
INTRODUCTION
Abnormal deposition of α-synuclein aggregates is a pathological feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD)1. While a large body of recent studies suggests that transcellular transmission of α-synuclein aggregates drives the progression of PD2–5, the mechanisms underlying such transmission are not clearly understood. Particularly urgent issues include whether cell-to-cell transmission of aggregates is seeding-dependent, whether the aggregates disseminates to large cell populations through continuous transmission, and the role of other PD-related genes in this process6.
Genetic and pathological evidence has suggested that lysosomal impairment is a major contributor in the pathogenesis of Lewy body diseases7. The GBA1 gene encodes a lysosomal hydrolase, glucocerebrosidase (GCase), which is deficient in Gaucher disease, the most common lysosomal storage disease. Moreover, mutations in GBA1 are strong genetic risk factors in PD8 and in dementia with Lewy bodies9, although the mechanism by which mutations in GBA1 increase the risk of PD remains unclear. α-synuclein aggregates that were transferred from cell to cell were transported through the endolysosomal pathway and were degraded in lysosomes10,11, the finding that prompted us to hypothesize that GBA1 deficiency causes lysosomal dysfunction, thereby increasing the efficiency of aggregate transmission.
In the current study, we investigated the mechanism of perpetual transmission of α-synuclein aggregates through continuous cell-to-cell transmission and the roles of GCase, a lysosomal enzyme whose mutations represent the most common genetic risk for PD and are implicated in disease severity.
RESULTS
Seeding-dependent aggregate transmission in the novel dual-cell BiFC system
In order to clarify the mechanism of aggregate propagation by direct observation of cell-to-cell transmission of α-synuclein aggregates, we developed an assay based on bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), which has been previously successfully applied to assess protein-protein interactions and protein dimerization or oligomerization in living mammalian cells12. We produced two stable cell lines expressing α-synuclein fused to either the N-terminus (V1S) or C-terminus (SV2) fragment of Venus, a variant of yellow fluorescence protein (Fig. 1a). The V1S and SV2 constructs were individually transfected into SH-SY5Y cells, and stable cell lines expressing similar levels of the two α-synuclein fusion proteins were selected (Fig. 1b). As anticipated, neither V1S-expressing cells nor SV2-expressing cells fluoresced in individual culture (Fig. 1d, e). When the cell lines were co-cultured, however, fluorescence resulting from dimerization or oligomerization of the V1S and SV2 fusion proteins13 during cell-to-cell transfer of α-synuclein was visualized using BiFC (Fig. 1a, d, e). Neither the co-culture of cells expressing V1S and the C-terminal fragment of Venus (V2) nor those expressing SV2 and the N-terminal fragment of Venus (V1) produced BiFC frourescence (Supplementary Fig. 1), validating the specificity of homotypic interaction between a-synuclein proteins. Since V1S was secreted at a higher level than SV2 (Fig. 1c), transfer of α-synuclein during co-culture of the cell lines was assumed to primarily involve V1S.
Immunoflourescence analysis showed that approximately 2–5% of cells contained small fluorescent inclusion bodies positive for α-synuclein and the N- and C-termini of Venus (Fig. 1d, e), phospho-α-synuclein (Ser129), and ubiquitin (Fig. 1f). These characteristics are similar to the Lewy bodies and pathogenic inclusions observed in transgenic models14–16. Three-dimensional reconstruction of z-stack images indicated that the fluorescent inclusions were intracellular structures (Fig. 1g). These results collectively demonstrated the cell-to-cell transfer and co-aggregation of the transferred α-synuclein with resident α-synuclein in the recipient cells, supporting the “seeding” hypothesis of aggregate propagation3.
Assessed by western analysis, the majority of intracellular α-synuclein in V1S and SV2 cells was triton x-100 soluble and monomeric (Fig. 1b). However, the cell culture media contained the aggregates of α-synuclein (Fig. 1c), suggesting the aggregates were preferentially secreted from cells. This is consistent with our previous findings reported by Kim et al.17 and Jang et al.18. To further validate the presence of aggregates in the culture media, we performed size exclusion chromatography using the total culture medium (V1S CM) and the culture medium passed through a 100 kDa cutoff filter (V1S CM-FT) (Fig. 2a–c). Histogram of V1S CM showed distribution of α-synuclein in a wide size ranges from monomer (13 mL) to void volume fractions (8 mL), while that of V1S CM-FT showed only the monomer (Fig. 2 b, c). This suggests that the V1S CM contained aggregated forms, and 100 kDa cutoff filtration effectively removed the aggregates, leaving only the monomers. To confirm the seeded aggregation in the recipient cells, we treated SV2 cells with either the total V1S CM or V1S CM-FT and analyzed BiFC-positive aggregates. Administration of the total V1S CM resulted in BiFC-positive aggregates in SV2 cells, whereas removal of high-molecular weight aggregates from the V1S CM (V1S CM-FT) eliminated the “seeding” ability of the CM (Fig. 2d, e). These data strongly suggest that cells release aggregated α-synuclein, and the aggregated forms can seed the aggregation in the recipient cells in our dual cell-BiFC model.
Perpetual spreading of α-synuclein aggregates through continuous cell-to-cell transmission
To explain pathological aggregate spreading within the central nervous system (CNS), cell-to-cell transmission should not be a single discontinuous process. The secondary release of co-aggregated α-synuclein that is produced in the first round of transmission, is absolutely required for spreading of aggregate pathology. To address this problem, we used the dual-cell BiFC system. During continuous subculture of V1S and SV2-expressing cells, if transmission were a single discontinuous event, the percentage of BiFC-positive cells would decrease as passage number increased. Conversely, if the transmission were a continuous event, the percentage of BiFC-positive cells would increase with passage number until reaching a steady state (Supplementary Fig. 5). Co-culture of V1S and SV2 cells for several passages (cultured for 48 h for each passage) resulted in a continuous increase in the percentage of BiFC-positive cells (Fig. 3a, b). Similarly, BiFC fluorescence in the culture media, representing the secondary secretion of co-aggregates of the “seed” and endogenous α-synuclein, also increased with increasing number of passages (Fig. 3c). This was confirmed by increased quantities of oligomers in the media (Fig. 3d).
To demonstrate the transfer of seeds through the fluid phase, we next performed media washing and antibody blocking experiments. During the co-culture of V1S and SV2 cells, culture media were removed and replaced with the fresh media. When BiFC fluorescence was analyzed one day after the media replacement, both intracellular and media BiFC signals were decreased (Fig. 3e, f), consistent with fluid phase transfer of the seed. Next, we added Ab274, an α-synuclein-specific antibody, to the co-culture one day prior to the BiFC analysis, in order to hijack the secreted α-synuclein, thereby blocking the transfer of this protein. This antibody treatment suppressed BiFC signals in both the cytoplasm and the media (Fig. 3g, h). To assess the temporal changes of the seeding and secondary secretion, we conducted a pulse-chase experiment, in which conditioned medium (CM) obtained from the V1S culture was added to the SV2 cells. After a steady state was reached, the V1S CM was washed out and the BiFC signal was analyzed in cells and the medium at selected time points. Coaggregates of V1S and SV2 proteins disappeared rapidly from the cytoplasm after medium washing, whereas the secreted BiFC signal increased reciprocally (Fig. 3i, j). Oligomer-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) confirmed the increase in the level of α-synuclein oligomers in the medium (Fig. 3k). Together, these results suggest that α-synuclein aggregates are transferred from cell to cell contiguously through a cycle of sequential events, involving inter-cellular aggregate transfer, seeding of the aggregation of endogenous α-synuclein, and secondary secretion of the seeded aggregates (Supplementary Fig. 7).
GBA1 deficiency led to lysosomal dysfunction
To assess the role of GBA1, a strong genetic risk factor for PD, in α-synuclein aggregate transmission, we used a zinc finger nuclease-based method to establish an SV2 cell line, SV2GBA1−/−, containing nonsense mutations in both alleles of the GBA1 gene (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 8). This cell line fails to express GCase 1 (Fig. 4b), resulting in greatly reduced total GCase activity (Fig. 4c). GCase 2 activity was much lower than the GCase 1 activity, and did not change as a result of GBA1 gene mutation (Fig. 4d). As a consequence of depletion of GCase 1, glucosylceramide, a substrate of the enzyme, accumulated in SV2GBA−/− cells (Fig. 4e).
SV2GBA1−/− cells were characterized by accumulation of lysosomal substrates such as p62 (Fig. 5a) and polyubiquitinated proteins (Fig. 5b), suggesting lysosomal dysfunction. Consistent with the lysosomal abnormalities, these cells had increased Lysotracker-positive structures (Fig. 5c), reduced degradation of ectopically introduced dextran (Fig. 5d), and exhibited accumulation of vacuolar structures in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5e), all of which clearly demonstrated lysosomal impairment. In addition, we confirmed that GBA1 gene deletion caused lysosomal dysfunction in parental SH-SY5Y cells (data not shown).
GBA1 deficiency potentiated continuous transmission of α-synuclein aggregates
We next examined whether GBA1 deletion affects cell-to-cell transmission of α-synuclein. When V1S cells were co-cultured with SV2GBA1−/− cells, the percentage of BiFC-positive cells was significantly increased compared with V1S/SV2 co-cultures (Fig. 6a). We interpret this to reflect the reduced capacity of SV2GBA1−/− cells to clear internalized aggregates due to lysosomal impairment (Fig. 6b). We then examined the effects of GBA1 gene deletion on contiguous transmission. Co-culturing of V1S and SV2GBA1−/− cells resulted in a significant increase in the number of BiFC-positive cells relative to V1S/SV2 co-cultures during several passages (Fig. 6c, d). Similarly, levels of α-synuclein oligomers were higher in the media of V1S/SV2GBA1−/− co-cultures than in V1S/SV2 co-cultures (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Fig. 9). Further indicating the role of GBA1 in this process, this phenomenon was reversed by AAV vector-mediated ectopic expression of the wild type GBA1 gene, but not in that encoding the activity-deficient GBA1 E235K mutant (Fig. 5f, g).
To ensure that the results of the GBA1 gene deletion did not represent “off-target” effects, we next performed RNA interference (RNAi) experiments using AAV vectors. Reduction of GCase 1 expression using two different small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) was confirmed with western analysis and activity assays (Supplementary Fig. 10). Knockdown of GCase 1 production resulted in a consistent increase in cell-to-cell transfer of α-synuclein. This effect of GCase 1 knockdown was reversed by recovery of GCase 1 production, hence the recovered activity, from ectopic expression of the wild type GBA1 gene (Supplementary Fig. 11). Collectively, these results show that GBA1 depletion promoted perpetual transmission of α–synuclein aggregates and that ectopic expression of wild type GBA1 reversed this effect, suggesting that loss of GBA1 function increases α-synuclein aggregate spreading.
We have previously shown that transgenic human α-synuclein was transferred from host cells to engrafted cells10. To validate the role of GBA1 in vivo, we performed a transplantation experiment in which normal SH-SY5Y cells and GBA1−/− (SH-GBA1−/−) cells were transplanted into the hippocampus of transgenic mice expressing human α-synuclein, and transfer of α-synuclein from host cells to the grafted cells was analyzed. The grafted SH-SY5Y cells do not overexpress α-synuclein, only express small amount of endogenous α-synuclein, which hardly shows up in regular immunological detection protocols (Fig. 7a–c). We found that host-derived α-synuclein was deposited at a higher rate in SH-GBA−/− cells than in normal SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 7a–c). Moreover, co-immunofluorescence analysis showed that SH-SY5Y GBA−/− cells accumulated host-derived α-synuclein at higher levels than normal SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 7d, e). Note that although SH-SY5Y cells express low levels of endogenous α-synuclein, we failed to detect expression of endogenous α-synuclein in engrafted SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 7a–c). SH-SY5Y cells are human neuroblastoma cells that produce catecholamines, including dopamine. To ensure that our analysis was specific for engrafted cells, we incorporated immunostaining for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and found that levels of host-derived α-synuclein were higher in TH-positive engrafted SH-SY5Y GBA−/− cells than in TH-positive engrafted SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 7f, g). Although there are TH-positive fibers in the hippocampus, there are no TH-positive cells. Thus, TH-positive cells in the hippocampus represent the grafted cells. We also performed a control experiment where differentiated SH-SY5Y cells were tagged with the enhanced green fluorescence protein (eGFP) via lentiviral infection and co-labeled for TH. We found that in vitro approximately 95% of the eGFP-positive cells were TH-positive. Likewise, about 80% of the grafted SH-SY5Y-eGFP cells in the mouse hippocampus (n=5) were TH-positive (Supplementary Fig. 12).
DISCUSSION
The current study demonstrated that cell-to-cell transmission of α-synuclein aggregates is mediated by a seeding mechanism and that secondary secretion of the resulting seeded aggregates mediates contiguous propagation of α-synuclein aggregates. In addition, the contiguous propagation of aggregates is significantly promoted by lysosomal dysfunction secondary to loss of GBA1 function. In PD patients with heterozygous mutations of GBA1, GCase activities and protein levels were reduced19, indicating pathological consequences of GBA1 heteroinsufficiency. Moreover, GBA1 mutation carriers have twice the number of cortical Lewy bodies than those of non-carriers20. In addition, heterozygous mutations of GBA1 have been associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment21 and more rapid disease progression22, supporting the hypothesis that the rate of spreading of Lewy pathology determines the rate of clinical progression.
The current study provides evidence that α-synuclein transmission is not a single discontinuous event, but a perpetual one. First, Continuous subculture of V1S/SV2 co-culture showed increased BiFC-positive cell population, instead of its decrease. This observation that there is no dilution effect of BiFC-positive cells as the cell population grows suggests perpetual propagation of α-synuclein aggregates. Second, we found release of BiFC-positive species from V1S/SV2 co-cultures, which can only be explained by secondary release of these species after co-aggregation of transferred and resident α-synuclein in the recipient cells. This secondary release of aggregates is a pre-requisite for perpetual propagation of aggregates. Third, ectopic introduction of V1S protein, released from V1S cells, rapidly resulted in BiFC-positive punctates in SV2 cells, and BiFC-positive aggregate species were gradually released from SV2 cells, as cellular BiFC species gradually decreased. These results collectively support the notion that α-synuclein aggregates perpetually propagate through the continuous cycle of exocytosis, endocytosis, seeded aggregation, and secondary exocytosis.
After several passage of the co-culture, the BiFC-positive population reached a steady state, the balance between aggregate production/propagation and degradation as well as cell proliferation rate, which will determine the rate of aggregate dilution. The dilution effect owing to cell proliferation will not be a factor in vivo, since neurons are post-mitotic. We suggest that lysosomal degradation is the main force behind the limited increase in BiFC-positive population during successive passages. Increased steady state levels of BiFC-positive cell population with GBA1−/− cells supports this idea.
Cell-to-cell transmission we assay with the new dual-cell BiFC system is not a robust event. We typically observe 2–5% cells with BiFC-positive puncta, though the number varies depending on the culture conditions, such as cell density. The BiFC fluorescence we observe in this system is not an artefact, because either cell line alone rarely shows BiFC signal. Neuroblastoma cells we used in this study produce catecholamines, such as dopamine, which are vulnerable to oxidation. Occasional occurrence of BiFC-positive cells in each cell line is probably due to autofluorescence generated by oxidation of catechols. Although we used extreme caution in handling these cell lines (we only used 2-week to 2-month old cells), some cells generated this non-specific background, usually in less than 0.5% of cells.
Previous studies showed that α-synuclein can be transferred from neurons to astrocytes23 and oligodendrocytes24. In our dual cell BiFC system, V1S cells secrete α-synuclein much better than SV2 cells (Figure 1), so we postulate that V1S cells are the predominant donor cells at least in the initial transfer. In the current study, we intended to investigate the role of GCase 1 in the recipient cells, because the primary goal of the study was to assess the role of lysosomal function in clearance of transferred α-synuclein and its consequence to aggregates propagation. For this reason, we used SV2GBA1−/− in this study. However, it will be important to address the role of neuronal GBA1 activity in neuron-to-glia transmission of α-synuclein in the future studies.
Although the current study suggests that loss of GBA1 function plays a role in synucleinopathies, this does not necessarily rule out the pathological consequences of gain of GBA1 function mutations. For example, previous studies have associated mutant GBA1 with impaired endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation25 and physical interaction between α-synuclein and GCase has been demonstrated under acidic conditions26. These studies support a potential role for gain-of-function GBA1 mutations, and stress the point that GBA1 mutations may exert their pathogenic actions via multiple mechanisms. That said, the current study demonstrates that ectopic expression of wild type GBA1, but not an activity-deficient GBA1 mutant, reversed the effects of GBA1 deletion on propagation of α-synuclein aggregates, presenting an attractive therapeutic opportunity for idiopathic PD. These results are in good agreement with previous studies demonstrating amelioration of synucleinopathy lesions in the brains of the GD mouse model (D409V/D409V) by viral-mediated expression of GBA127. Taken together, our work strongly implicates GCase as a disease-modifying therapeutic target, and suggests that restoring the activity of this protein might retard the propagation of Lewy pathology, thereby halting the progression of PD.
ONLINE METHODS
Materials
The following antibodies were used in this study: α-synuclein monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences; #610787, San Diego, CA), α-synuclein monoclonal antibody #274, phosphorylated α-synuclein polyclonal antibody (Abcam, ab59264; Cambridge, MA), GFP (c-terminus) polyclonal antibody (IMGENEX, #5127A; San Diego, CA), GFP (N-terminus) polyclonal antibody (Cell signaling Technology, #2555; Beverly, MA), GFP (N-terminus) monoclonal antibody (Abcam, ab127417), GCase monoclonal antibody 8E4 (from J. Barranger, University of Pittsburgh), GCase polyclonal antibody (Sigma, G4171; St. Louis, MO), p62 monoclonal antibody (BD Transduction laboratories, #c2384-0B; Swampscott, MA), ubiquitin polyclonal antibodies (Dako; Glostrup, Denmark and Chemicon; Temecula, CA), and β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma). Fluorescence dye-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). The Q tracker 858 cell labeling kit was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
Construction of stable cell lines
To generate stable cell lines, SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells were transfected with Venus1-αSyn (V1S) or αSyn-Venus2 (SV2) (kind gifts from Dr. Pamela McLean, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA) using electroporation. Transfected cells were selected with 600 µg/mL G418 (Invitrogen) for 2–3 weeks until colonies emerged. The stable cell lines were maintained with 200 µg/mL G418.
Generation of GBA1 knockout (KO) cell lines
SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with plasmids encoding ZFN and a magnetic reporter (ToolGen; Seoul, Korea) using electroporation. After incubation for 48 h, cells were subjected to magnetic separation. After trypsinization, cells were mixed with magnetic bead-conjugated antibody against H-2Kk (MACSelect Kk microbeads; Miltenyi Biotech; Germany) and the mixture was applied to a MACS LS column (Miltenyi Biotech). Single cells obtained from the eluates were maintained until the clonal colony was picked from the culture dish. Nonsense mutations in the GBA1 gene were confirmed using DNA sequencing.
Cell culture
SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell lines were maintained as described previously28. For co-culture, V1S and SV2 stable cells (180,000 cells each) were mixed in a coverslip and cultured for 3 days. In order to determine the continuous transmission of α-synuclein, the mixture of V1S and SV2 cells was subcultured every 2 days (48 h).
To determine the effects of media washing on transmission, the V1S/SV2 co-culture was washed with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and incubated with fresh growth media the day prior to assay. To determine the effects of antibodies on the transmission of α-synuclein, 5 µg/mL of control IgG or Ab274 was added to V1S/SV2 co-culture the day prior to the assay.
Size Exclusion Chromatography
Size exclusion chromatography was performed using AKTA purifier (GE Healthcare Life Science, Piscataway, NJ). Samples were applied to Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (GE Healthcare Life Science) equilibrated with phosphate buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl) and eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/minute.
Quantification of GCase activity and glycosphingolipid levels
Cellular GCase activity was determined as described previously27 using 4-methylumbelliferyl (4-MU)-β-D-glucoside as the artificial substrate. All measurements were done without taurocholate, a detergent that activates the GCase enzymatic activity. GCase2 specific activity was determined in the presence of the GCase1 inhibitor, conduritol-B-epoxide (100μM). GCase1 activity was obtained by subtracting the GCase2 activity levels from the total GCase activity. Cellular GlcCer and GalCer levels were measured by mass spectrometry as previously described27. Briefly, organic cellular extracts were injected onto an Atlantis HILIC silica column (Waters Corp.; Milford, MA) for separation of GlcCer and GalCer, which were detected using an AB Sciex API-5000 mass spectrometer.
Infection with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors
After passage, cells were co-infected with Ad-TS129 (3 M.O.I.) and various AAV (5e6 M.O.I.). Cells were incubated at 39°C for 24 h for activation of the temperature-sensitive helper adenovirus. Several AAV vectors were designed for knockdown of GBA1 (GFP-miRNA GBA1a and b) and a rescue vector expressing a miRNA-resistant GBA* (GBA*-miRNA GBA1b).
Quantification of secreted α-synuclein aggregates
To measure the level of secreted α-synuclein co-aggregates, culture medium obtained from V1S/ SV2 co-culture was centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant from culture media was transferred to a 96-well black plate (Corning Inc.; Corning, NY) and subjected to fluorometric analysis using a fluorescence microplate reader (SpectraMax Gemini EM;, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The procedure for the ELISA was performed as described previously29. Briefly, 1 µg/mL of the capture antibody #62 in 50 mM carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) was coated on a 96-well ELISA plate (Maxisorp, Nunc; Rochester, NY) overnight at 4°C. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), SuperBlock T20 PBS blocking buffer (Pierce; Rockford, IL) was added for 1 h at room temperature (RT) with shaking. After washing with PBST, α–synuclein aggregates from the standard and culture media were incubated at RT for 2.5 h with shaking. Plates were washed again with PBST, after which 1 µg/mL of biotinylated reporter antibody #62 was added and incubated at RT for 1.5 h. After washing with PBST, avidin-conjugated peroxidase (ExtrAvidin; Sigma; St. Louis, MO) was added to the plate. The plate was then incubated with 3,3’5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine solution (Sigma). After addition of 2 N H2SO4, absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a SpectraMax 190 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices).
Preparation of cell extracts
After washing with ice-cold PBS, cells were lysed in extraction buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) in PBS). Cell lysates were incubated on ice for 10 min and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min. The Triton X-100 insoluble fraction was resuspended in 1× Laemmli sample buffer and sonicated briefly.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed as previously described30. Images were obtained and quantified using the FUJIFILM Luminescent Image Analyzer LAS-3000 and Multi Gauge (v3.0) software (FUJIFILM; Tokyo, Japan).
Immunofluorescence staining
The procedure for immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described30. Briefly, cells grown on poly-L-Lysine-coated coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. After incubation in blocking solution (5% bovine serum albumin/3% goat serum in PBS), primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution were added to cells. After washing, cells were incubated with fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibodies. Nuclei were stained with TOPRO-3 iodide (Invitrogen). Cells were mounted onto slide glasses in the presence of Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent (Invitrogen). Olympus FV1000 confocal laser scanning microscopy was used for observation of cells.
Characterization of lysosomal dysfunction
For imaging of the lysotracker-positive compartment, SH-SY5Y cells were stained with 75 nM lysotracker solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (Lysotracker Red DND-99; Invitrogen) diluted in growth media, and incubated for 1 h at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. After washing with ice-cold PBS, cells were fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution. In order to determine the degradation ratio of internalized dextran, cells were incubated with 20 µg/mL of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextran (Invitrogen) for 2 h. After washing with DMEM, cells were incubated with fresh growth media for 30 min and fixed with a 4% PFA solution. The fluorescence intensity was measured using Olympus FV1000 software.
Electron microscopy
Cells were grown in 100-mm dishes and fixed in the Karnovsky’s fixative solution (2% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.5% CaCl2). After immersing in 1% osmium tetraoxide for 1.5 h, cells were dehydrated with 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of absolute ethanol. Cells were infiltrated with propylene oxide and EPON mixture (EPON 812, MNA, DDSA, DMP30) for 10 min prior to embedding EPON mixture. After embedding, the cells were sectioned with LEICA EM UC-7 Ultra-microtome (Leica Microsystems, Austria), then stained with 6% uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were observed using transmission electron microscopy JEM-1011 (JEOL; Japan) and analyzed using Megaview III software (Soft imaging system, Germany). For morphometric analysis, 15 cells were analyzed for each experiment.
Analysis of externally added recombinant α–synuclein aggregates in cells
Cells were incubated with 0.2 µM of α-synuclein fibrils for 1 day and fixed with 4% PFA. After immunofluorescence staining, the intensity of α-synuclein in a single cell was measured using Olympus FV1000 software.
Animals
For this study we used heterozygous transgenic mice (Line 61) expressing wild type human α-synuclein under the control of the mThy1 promoter31. These mice were selected since they display extensive neuronal and synaptic accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates throughout the neocortex, limbic system, and striato-nigral system, accompanied by motor and non-motor deficits32 similar to those observed in patients with PD and dementia with Lewy-Bodies. Moreover, we have previously shown that α-synuclein in these mice is transmitted from neurons to grafted cells10, permitting the evaluation of the effects of GBA1 on transmission.
Stereotaxic delivery of SH-SY5Y GBA1−/− cells into α-synuclein transgenic mice
α-synuclein transgenic mice and their non-transgenic litter mates (n = 8 per group, 10-months-old, total 4 groups, 32 mice) received unilateral stereotaxic injections of a 2µL suspension of wild type or GBA1−/− cell preparation (1.2 million cells) into the hippocampus as previously described10. Mice were anesthetized and placed on a Koft stereotaxic apparatus. Utilizing an electronic delivery pump system, SH-SY5Y or SH-SY5Y GBA−/− cell preparations were injected using a Hamilton syringe. Coordinates for the hippocampus were as follows: AP −2.0 mm, lateral 1.5 mm, depth 1.3 mm. Mice survived for four weeks after the graft injection. Following NIH guidelines for the humane treatment of animals, mice were anesthetized with chloral hydrate and flush-perfused transcardially with 0.9% saline. Brains were removed and fixed in phosphate-buffered 4% PFA (pH 7.4) at 4°C for 48 h for neuropathological analysis.
Immunocytochemical analysis and laser scanning confocal microscopy
Brains were serially sectioned at 40 µm using a vibratome (Leica; Deerfield, IL, USA). Serial, free-floating, blind-coded vibratome sections from transgenic and non-transgenic mice grafted with WT and SH-SY5Y GBA1−/− cells were immunostained as previously described33 with antibodies against total α-synuclein (Millipore), α-synuclein c-terminus (SYN105 antibody), and human α-synuclein (SYN211). Sections were then incubated with biotin-tagged secondary antibodies and developed with diaminobenzidine. Sections immunolabeled with antibodies against α-synuclein (three from each mouse at 100-µm intervals) were analyzed via the dissector method using the Stereo-Investigator System (MBF Bioscience; Williston, VT) and the results were averaged and expressed as the percentage of positive cells in the grafted area.
To determine the co-localization between α-synuclein and neuronal markers, double-labeling experiments were performed, as previously described34. For this purpose, vibratome sections were immunolabeled using an antibody against human α-synuclein (SYN211) and antibodies against TH (Millipore) and GCase (Abcam, ab55080). The TH- and GCase-immunoreactive grafted cells were detected with FITC-tagged antibodies (1:75; Vector; Burlingame, CA), while α-synuclein was detected with Tyramide Red (NEN Life Sciences). All sections were processed simultaneously under the same conditions, and experiments were performed in duplicate in order to assess the reproducibility of results. Sections were imaged with a Zeiss 63× (N.A. 1.4) objective on an Axiovert 35 microscope (Zeiss) with an attached MRC1024 laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) system (BioRad)34. Series of paired optical sections were analyzed with ImageJ co-localization color map software to determine the α-synuclein pixel intensity associated with WT and GBA1−/− cells. An average of 20 digital images was analyzed per mouse. Each digital image contained an average of 4 cells. Values in the figures are expressed as means ± SEM.
Statistical analysis
Values shown in the figures are presented as mean ± S.E.M. To determine the statistical significance, P-values were calculated by means of paired, two-tailed Student’s t-tests using GraphPad InStat version 3.05 software.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (to SJL; 2010-0015188), the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (to SJL; A111228), and by the NIH (to EM; AG18440, AG022074).
Footnotes
Author Contributions
Eun-Jin Bae designed and performed the majority of experiments, analyzed the data, and was involved in manuscript preparation. Miyoung Song and He-Jin Lee designed and generated the V1S and SV2 cell lines and characterized the dual-cell BiFC model. Na-Young Yang and Cheol Soon Lee performed experiments with Eun-Jin Bae. Jun Sung Lee performed the size exclusion chromatography. Seok Joong Kim designed and constructed Zinc finger nuclease plasmids. Eliezer Masliah designed, performed, and analyzed the mouse transplantation experiments. Sergio Pablo Sardi conceived of the study, provided the AAVs, performed GCase activity assays and lipid analysis, and was involved in manuscript editing. Seung-Jae Lee conceived of and coordinated the study, designed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jellinger KA. Alpha-synuclein pathology in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease brain: incidence and topographic distribution--a pilot study. Acta Neuropathol. 2003;106:191–201. doi: 10.1007/s00401-003-0725-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brundin P, Melki R, Kopito R. Prion-like transmission of protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:301–307. doi: 10.1038/nrm2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee SJ, Desplats P, Sigurdson C, Tsigelny I, Masliah E. Cell-to-cell transmission of non-prion protein aggregates. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:702–706. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Angot E, et al. Alpha-synuclein cell-to-cell transfer and seeding in grafted dopaminergic neurons in vivo. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Danzer KM, et al. Exosomal cell-to-cell transmission of alpha synuclein oligomers. Mol Neurodegener. 2012;7:42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-7-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee HJ, Bae EJ, Lee SJ. Extracellular alpha-synuclein-a novel and crucial factor in Lewy body diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pan T, Kondo S, Le W, Jankovic J. The role of autophagy-lysosome pathway in neurodegeneration associated with Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2008 doi: 10.1093/brain/awm318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sidransky E, et al. Multicenter analysis of glucocerebrosidase mutations in Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1651–1661. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nalls MA, et al. A multicenter study of glucocerebrosidase mutations in dementia with Lewy bodies. JAMA neurology. 2013;70:727–735. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Desplats P, et al. Inclusion formation and neuronal cell death through neuron-to-neuron transmission of alpha-synuclein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13010–13015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903691106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee H-J, et al. Assembly-dependent endocytosis and clearance of extracellular alpha-synuclein. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:1835–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goncalves SA, Matos JE, Outeiro TF. Zooming into protein oligomerization in neurodegeneration using BiFC. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2010;35:643–651. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Outeiro TF, et al. Formation of toxic oligomeric alpha-synuclein species in living cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujiwara H, et al. alpha-Synuclein is phosphorylated in synucleinopathy lesions. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:160–164. doi: 10.1038/ncb748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spillantini MG, Crowther RA, Jakes R, Hasegawa M, Goedert M. alpha-Synuclein in filamentous inclusions of Lewy bodies from Parkinson's disease and dementia with lewy bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:6469–6473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kahle PJ. alpha-Synucleinopathy models and human neuropathology: similarities and differences. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;115:87–95. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0302-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim C, et al. Neuron-released oligomeric alpha-synuclein is an endogenous agonist of TLR2 for paracrine activation of microglia. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1562. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jang A, et al. Non-classical exocytosis of alpha-synuclein is sensitive to folding states and promoted under stress conditions. J Neurochem. 2010;113:1263–1274. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gegg ME, et al. Glucocerebrosidase deficiency in substantia nigra of parkinson disease brains. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:455–463. doi: 10.1002/ana.23614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clark LN, et al. Association of glucocerebrosidase mutations with dementia with lewy bodies. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:578–583. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alcalay RN, et al. Cognitive performance of GBA mutation carriers with early-onset PD: the CORE-PD study. Neurology. 2012;78:1434–1440. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318253d54b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Winder-Rhodes SE, et al. Glucocerebrosidase mutations influence the natural history of Parkinson's disease in a community-based incident cohort. Brain. 2013;136:392–399. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee HJ, et al. Direct transfer of alpha-synuclein from neuron to astroglia causes inflammatory responses in synucleinopathies. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:9262–9272. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.081125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reyes JF, et al. Alpha-synuclein transfers from neurons to oligodendrocytes. Glia. 2014;62:387–398. doi: 10.1002/glia.22611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ron I, Horowitz M. ER retention and degradation as the molecular basis underlying Gaucher disease heterogeneity. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2387–2398. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yap TL, et al. Alpha-synuclein interacts with Glucocerebrosidase providing a molecular link between Parkinson and Gaucher diseases. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:28080–28088. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.237859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sardi SP, et al. CNS expression of glucocerebrosidase corrects alpha-synuclein pathology and memory in a mouse model of Gaucher-related synucleinopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:12101–12106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108197108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee H-J, Khoshaghideh F, Patel S, Lee S-J. Clearance of alpha-synuclein oligomeric intermediates via the lysosomal degradation pathway. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:1888–1896. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3809-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee HJ, et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for alpha-synuclein with species and multimeric state specificities. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;199:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee H-J, Lee S-J. Characterization of Cytoplasmic alpha -Synuclein Aggregates. FIBRIL FORMATION IS TIGHTLY LINKED TO THE INCLUSION-FORMING PROCESS IN CELLS. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:48976–48983. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208192200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rockenstein E, et al. Differential neuropathological alterations in transgenic mice expressing alpha-synuclein from the platelet-derived growth factor and Thy-1 promoters. J Neurosci Res. 2002;68:568–578. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fleming SM, et al. Early and progressive sensorimotor anomalies in mice overexpressing wild-type human alpha-synuclein. J Neurosci. 2004;24:9434–9440. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3080-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bae EJ, et al. Antibody-Aided Clearance of Extracellular alpha-Synuclein Prevents Cell-to-Cell Aggregate Transmission. J Neurosci. 2012;32:13454–13469. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1292-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Masliah E, et al. Passive immunization reduces behavioral and neuropathological deficits in an alpha-synuclein transgenic model of Lewy body disease. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]