Abstract
An improved LC-MS/MS method was developed for simultaneous determination of eleven bioactive constituents of Radix Angelicae Pubescentis and its related preparations. It was the first report on the quantification of bioactive constituents in different preparations of Radix Angelicae Pubescentis by LC-MS/MS analytical method. These samples were separated with an Agilent Zorbax Extend reversed-phase C18 column (1.8 μm, 4.6 × 100 mm) by linear gradient elution using aqueous ammonium acetate and acetonitrile as mobile phase. The flow rate was 0.3 mL min−1. The eleven bioactive constituents showed good regression (R > 0.990) within test ranges and the recoveries were in the range of 87.1–110%. The limit of detections and quantifications for most of the major constituents were less than 0.5 and 1.0 ng mL−1, respectively. All results indicated that the developed method could be readily utilized as a suitable quality control method for Radix Angelicae Pubescentis and related preparations.
1. Introduction
Radix Angelicae Pubescentis (RAP) is one of the most commonly used traditional medicines in China for the treatment of rheumatic diseases (Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China, 2010). It was named as Duhuo in Chinese. Recent pharmacological studies have revealed that it has anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities [1, 2], antiparasitic [3, 4], and inhibitory effects on 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase [5]. Various traditional Chinese medicinal prescriptions containing RAP are commercially available, such as Duhuo Jisheng pill, Tianma capsule, Tianma pill, Shujin pill, Shufengdingtong pill, Zhonghua Dieda pill and Zhuangguguanjie pill. Most of the above of these preparations have been used in the treatment of pain and inflammatory diseases [6, 7]. The demand for RAP is still increasing and becomes more and more important. Furthermore, the composition of the various bioactive compounds in Radix Angelicae Pubescentis varies significantly with many factors such as climate conditions, geographic locations, development stages, and harvest time [8, 9]. Due to the existence of such differences, the quality of Radix Angelicae Pubescentis and its related preparations also varied greatly. Therefore, it was very necessary to establish the method for control of the quality of RAP and related preparations.
A number of studies have been performed on the isolation and identification of the constituents of this herbal medicine. To date, more than 60 coumarins were isolated and identified from this plant [10–12]. It was already demonstrated that coumarins were putative active components. For example, HPLC-based activity profiling of the active extract revealed five coumarins (columbianetin acetate, imperatorin, osthol, and columbianadin) responsible for the GABAA receptor modulating activities [13]. It was reported that the angelol-type coumarins showed significant activity on human platelet aggregation [14]. Columbianetin has anti-inflammatory effect on activated human mast cells [15]. Osthole, isolated from RAP, has antiproliferative effect in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. It was also noticed that some coumarins have been linked to phototoxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and hepatotoxic effects [16, 17]. With these various functions in mind, it is not surprising that coumarins impact significantly on the clinical efficacy and safety of herbal medicine. Thus, coumarins were thought to be the most important bioactive markers for controlling quality of RAP and related prescriptions.
Although many analytical methods have been published about quality control of RAP, many questions still remained. Studies monitoring marker components have relied on HPLC-UV [18–20]. Based on the fact that the LC-MS/MS method was increasingly being used because of the additional specificity that could be obtained, an LC-MS/MS method was developed to simultaneously quantitate eleven bioactive constituents. Although three components (imperatorin, isoimperatorin, and osthole) in Peucedanum ostruthium (L.) Koch have been determined by HPLC-DAD [21] or six components (scopoletin, xanthotoxin, bergapten, imperatorin, osthole, and isoimperatorin) have been determined by LC-MS among the eleven compounds [22], the content of the other bioactive constituents is typically not determined by LC-MS/MS. This potentially important information is thus not available to the consumers.
In this paper, a multicomponent LC-MS/MS method of RAP was developed and validated. As an application, 11 batches of RAP and related preparations collected from different regions of China were analyzed using the established methods.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and Reagents
The RAP and related preparations samples were purchased from drugstores around Tianjin. Samples 1–4 were decoction pieces of RAP, and samples 5–11 were TCM preparations, namely, DuhuoJishengwan (20100602), Tianma capsule (20100111), Tianma pill (104417), Shujing pill (3990016), Shufengdingtong pill (100101), Zhonghuadida pill (091241), and Zhuangguguanjie pill (0810252). Umbelliferone, scopoletin, xanthotoxin, psoralen, and imperatorin were purchased from the National Institute for Control of Biological and Pharmaceutical Products of China. Columbianetin, bergapten, columbianetin acetate, osthol, isoimperatorin, and columbianadin were isolated from the roots of Angelicae pubescentis by Dr. Yanru Deng. Their structures were unambiguously confirmed according to their spectral data and their purities determined by HPLC were higher than 98%. Acetonitrile was chromatographically pure and was purchased from Dima Technology Inc. (USA). Deionized water was purified with a Milli-Q Academic ultrapure water system (Billerica, MA, USA) prior to the use as HPLC mobile phase. Methanol of HPLC grade was purchased from Tianjin Concord Science Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Ammonium acetate was purchased from GuangFu Fine Chemicals Institute of Tianjin (Tianjin, China).
2.2. Instrumentation and Conditions
2.2.1. Liquid Chromatography
All separations were carried out on an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatography system (Agilent, USA) equipped with a quaternary solvent delivery system, an autosampler, and a column compartment. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Zorbax Extend reversed-phase C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm I.D., 1.8 μm particle size) and an Agilent Zorbax C18 guard column. A linear gradient elution of eluents A (1 mmoL/L, aqueous ammonium acetate) and B (acetonitrile) was used for the separation. The elution programmer was optimized and conducted as follows: initial 0–11 min, linear change from 70 : 30 (A : B, v/v) to 65 : 35 (A : B, v/v); 11–15 min, linear change to 33 : 67 (A : B, v/v); 15–35 min, linear change to 32 : 68 (A : B, v/v); and 35-36 min, linear change to 70 : 30 (A : B, v/v). Reequilibration time of gradient elution was 5 min. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, and the sample injection volume was 5 μL.
2.2.2. Mass Spectrometer
The LC-MS/MS analyses were conducted on an API 3200 system from Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The instrument was operated with an electrospray ionization source running in positive modes in a single run, and the ion spray voltage was set to 4500 kV. The turbo spray temperature was maintained at 450°C. The nebulizer gas (gas 1) and heater gas (gas 2) were set at 40 and 40 arbitrary units, respectively. The curtain gas was kept at 20 arbitrary units, and the interface heater was turned on. Nitrogen was used in all cases. Multiple-reaction monitoring mode was employed for quantification. The precursor-to-product ion pair, declustering potential (DP), collision energy (CE), collision cell exit potential (CXP), and entrance potential (EP) for each analyte and digoxin are described in Table 1. The dwell time of each ion pair was 100 ms. All instrumentation was controlled and synchronized by Analyst software (version 1.4.2) from Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex.
Table 1.
Retention time, MS/MS fragment ions, declustering potential (DP), and collision energy (CE) of the 11 coumarins compounds in Radix Angelicae Pubescentis.
| Compounds | Q1 | Q3 | DP (V) | EP (V) | CEP (V) | CE (V) | CXP (V) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scopoletin | 193.2 | 133.1 | 42 | 3 | 20 | 29 | 3.9 |
| Umbelliferone | 163.1 | 107.3 | 38 | 2 | 11 | 28 | 2 |
| IS (digoxin) | 798.6 | 113.3 | 25 | 3.8 | 35 | 68 | 2 |
| Columbianetin | 246.8 | 175.1 | 61 | 9 | 16.8 | 29 | 3 |
| Psoralen | 187.2 | 131.1 | 42 | 9 | 20 | 29 | 10 |
| Bergapten | 217.4 | 202.3 | 44 | 7 | 15.8 | 30 | 3 |
| Xanthotoxin | 217.4 | 174.1 | 46 | 8.8 | 11 | 34 | 16 |
| Columbianetin acetate | 288.9 | 229.1 | 46 | 2.9 | 18 | 12 | 4 |
| Imperatorin | 271.3 | 203.1 | 49 | 10 | 31 | 15 | 17 |
| Osthole | 244.8 | 189.2 | 53.8 | 3.7 | 16.8 | 20 | 4 |
| Isoimperatorin | 271.3 | 203.1 | 29 | 2 | 17.6 | 17 | 3 |
| Columbianadin | 329.4 | 229.2 | 42 | 3 | 19.5 | 32 | 2 |
2.2.3. Preparation of Sample Solutions
The dried decoction pieces of RAP samples were powdered to a homogeneous size by a mill. The capsule and pills were ground in a mortar. Each solid sample (60 mesh, 0.100 g) was accurately weighed and extracted with 10 mL of methanol by using an ultrasonic bath for 40 min and then cooled at room temperature. Methanol was added to compensate for the lost weight. The solution was filtered through a membrane filter (0.22 μm), and an aliquot of 5 μL of the filtrate was injected into LC-MS/MS for analysis.
2.2.4. Method Validation
Methanol stock solutions containing the eleven bioactive constituents were prepared and diluted to appropriate concentrations for construction of the calibration curves. The eleven coumarin solutions at 6 different concentrations were injected in triplicate and the calibration curves were constructed by plotting the peak area ratios of coumarins to IS versus the concentrations of each bioactive constituent. The LOD and LOQ of bioactive constituents were investigated on the basis of the results for three replicates of coumarins mixed standard stock solution at different levels, considering a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 and 10, respectively. The precision and stability of the developed method were evaluated at three concentration levels (low, medium, and high) of mixed standard solutions. Intraday precision was validated with three concentrations of mixed standard solutions for five times within 1 day. Interday precision was validated with the mixed standard solutions used above once a day for 3 consecutive days. The inter- and intraday precisions for all investigated components were expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD). To evaluate the reproducibility of our studies, six independently prepared samples of herb, capsule (batch number 20100111), and pill (batch number 0810252) in parallel were prepared and analyzed. Variations were expressed as RSD. Stability was tested at room temperature and samples were analyzed in triplicate every 8 h within 24 h. Samples 1 (herb), 3 (Tianma capsule), and 11 (Zhuangguguanjie pill) were selected to test recoveries of preparation of sample solutions.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Optimization of Extraction Conditions
In order to achieve an efficient extraction of active components in RAP, key factors such as methanol concentration (50, 70, and 100%, v/v), sample-solvent ratio (1 : 25, 1 : 50, and 1 : 100, w/v), and ultrasonic time (20, 40, and 60 min) were investigated by using orthogonal L9 (34) experiment. The optimum sample extraction condition was achieved by using 100 times of 70% (v/v) methanol for 20 min.
3.2. Optimization of Chromatographic Separation for Constituents
It is well known that choice of mobile phase and an appropriate elution program were of importance for the separation multicomponents in TCM. Based on previous studies, acetonitrile was selected as the organic phase in the mobile phase considering its better eluting power to the coumarins. A short column packed with 1.8 μm particles (Eclipse plus C18 column 4.6 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) using acetonitrile-water system was effective for the separation of samples of RAP and its related preparations. Furthermore, gradient elution possessed a distinct advantage for separating these eleven coumarins and a high sensitivity for determination by using MS/MS. It was reported that electrolyte modification ammonium acetate of mobile phase could significantly improve the ESI efficiency resulting in enhanced furocoumarins (xanthotoxin, psoralen, isopimpinellin, and bergapten) responses [23]. According to our previous research [24], a solvent system consisting of acetonitrile and 1 mmol ammonium acetate aqueous solution, which could provide greater baseline stability and higher sensitivity of analyte, was ultimately selected as mobile phase system.
3.3. Optimization of Mass Spectra
In the present study, ESI-MS analyses of eleven bioactive constituents were performed in both the positive-ion and negative-ion modes. The results showed that positive electrospray ionization could offer better sensitivity and reproducibility. Thus, positive mode was finally selected to detect the eleven bioactive constituents.
In order to optimize the MRM assay for each bioactive constituent, standard methanol solution of eleven bioactive constituents was infused into the ESI source with a syringe pump. It was found that the ESI-MS spectra of the eleven bioactive constituents were dominated by the presence of the [M + H]+ deprotonate molecule in the positive mode. IS were dominated by the presence of the [M + NH4]+ deprotonate molecule in the positive mode. A variety of molecular ions for digoxin, including [M – H2O]+, [M + H]+, [M + NH4]+, [M + Na]+, and [M + K]+, were observed in Q1 positive full-scan with respective m/z at 763.9, 781.9, 798.9, 803.9, and 819.7, respectively. A higher abundance was found for the ammonium addition of [M + NH4]+, which was used for further fragmentation in product ion scan. The product ions were obtained by fragmentation of the ammonium adduct precursor ion in a collision cell. Multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was used for quantitative detection, with sensitive ion transitions of m/z 798.6/113.3. Thus, the [M + H]+ ions for those of target compounds and [M + NH4]+ for IS were selected as the precursor ions and fragmented in MS/MS mode to obtain the prominent product ions, respectively.
The quantification of the analytes and IS was performed using the MRM data acquisitions and twelve pairs of MRM transitions which were listed in Table 1 were selected. Under the optimized LC conditions, retention times of eleven coumarins and IS were obtained from multiple injections of samples during the entire analysis time period. The retention times of scopoletin, umbelliferone, columbianetin, psoralen, xanthotoxin, bergapten, columbianetin acetate, imperatorin, osthol, isoimperatorin, and columbianadin were 7.72, 8.52, 10.42, 14.29, 19.81, 20.21, 21.30, 23.06, 27.84, 29.96, 31.48 32.84 min, respectively. Certain tendencies in the elution order were as follows: scopoletin, umbelliferone, columbianetin, psoralen, xanthotoxin, bergapten, columbianetin acetate, imperatorin, osthol, isoimperatorin, and columbianadin. From Figures 2 and 3, it could be seen that there were no interference peaks at the retention positions of the analytes and IS to interfere with the analysis of samples.
Figure 2.
Typical MRM chromatograms of eleven authentic standards Mixed.
Figure 3.
Typical MRM of Radix Angelicae Pubescentis.
3.4. Selection of Internal Standard
Although the molecular weight and chemical structure of digoxin are much different from those of target compounds, digoxin is easily obtained from market and has good sensitivity in the positive mode and good separation from the target compounds in the chromatogram. Therefore, digoxin is selected as internal standard in this study to calculate multicomponents.
3.5. Method Validation
The detailed descriptions of the regression curves were shown in Table 2. The good linearities (coefficient of determination R 2 > 0.990) were obtained in test ranges for all bioactive compounds. The values of LOD and LOQ of bioactive constituents were shown in Table 2. The LODs of all investigated bioactive constituents except for umbelliferone were below 1.5 ng mL−1 in the established method. The results of reproducibility and stability tests were shown in Table 3. The results of reproducibility tests are shown in Table 4. Table 4 also illustrated the data of recovery obtained in Radix Angelicae Pubescentis and its related preparations. The average recoveries of the eleven investigated compounds were 87.3–110% and their RSD values were lower than 10%. It was concluded that the proposed HPLC-MS/MS method was precise, accurate, and sensitive enough for simultaneous quantitative evaluation of the eleven coumarins in samples of RAP and its related preparations.
Table 2.
The calibration curves, LODs and LOQs (n = 5) for the active components of the assay.
| Compounds | Regression equation(a) | r | Linear range | LOD(b) | LOQ(c) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (ng mL−1) | (ng mL−1) | (ng mL−1) | |||
| Scopoletin | Y = 0.0175X + 0.0403 | 0.9995 | 1–500 | 0.30 | 1.0 |
| Umbelliferone | Y = 0.00219X + 2.69E − 015 | 0.9992 | 10–1000 | 0.30 | 1.0 |
| Columbianetin | Y = 0.00373X + 0.0112 | 0.9990 | 5–1000 | 0.50 | 1.7 |
| Psoralen | Y = 0.00634X + 0.0025 | 0.9990 | 10–5000 | 0.33 | 1.0 |
| Bergapten | Y = 0.0309X + 0.259 | 0.9999 | 1.1–1100 | 0.30 | 1.0 |
| Xanthotoxin | Y = 0.0189X + 0.0198 | 0.9990 | 10.7–1070 | 0.50 | 1.5 |
| Columbianetin acetate | Y = 0.0152X + 0.0103 | 0.9992 | 13–1300 | 0.30 | 1.0 |
| Imperatorin | Y = 0.0237X + 0.145 | 0.9998 | 5–1000 | 0.02 | 0.2 |
| Osthole | Y = 0.00395 + 0.00386 | 0.9998 | 12.7–1270 | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Isoimperatorin | Y = 0.123X + 0.0497 | 0.9999 | 10.3–1030 | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Columbianadin | Y = 0.00659X + 0.00819 | 0.9990 | 13–1300 | 0.17 | 0.5 |
(a)In the regression equation, the X value is the concentration of compounds (ng·mL−1), and the Y value is the peak area.
(b)Limit of detection.
(c)Limit of quantification.
Table 3.
Intra-assay and interassay precision of the developed method (n = 6).
| Components | Concentration | Intra-assay | Interassay | Stability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (ng mL−1) | RSD (%) | RSD (%) | RSD (%) | |
| Scopoletin | 20.6 | 5.03 | 6.17 | 9.46 |
| 103 | 3.16 | 5.20 | 5.44 | |
| 1030 | 2.13 | 4.91 | 5.37 | |
|
| ||||
| Umbelliferone | 20 | 9.04 | 9.00 | 9.53 |
| 100 | 4.89 | 3.04 | 6.48 | |
| 1000 | 5.14 | 7.11 | 9.35 | |
|
| ||||
| Columbianetin | 22 | 7.70 | 9.7 | 5.74 |
| 110 | 9.14 | 8.77 | 5.23 | |
| 1100 | 2.93 | 8.62 | 8.47 | |
|
| ||||
| Psoralen | 21.6 | 3.61 | 9.11 | 8.05 |
| 108 | 5.28 | 9.07 | 6.40 | |
| 1080 | 2.26 | 7.18 | 7.33 | |
|
| ||||
| Bergapten | 22 | 3.15 | 7.79 | 6.38 |
| 110 | 5.57 | 9.51 | 7.53 | |
| 1100 | 3.38 | 8.35 | 7.45 | |
|
| ||||
| Xanthotoxin | 21.4 | 6.81 | 6.88 | 5.21 |
| 107 | 3.27 | 3.04 | 4.97 | |
| 1070 | 2.87 | 8.31 | 7.88 | |
|
| ||||
| Columbianetin acetate | 26 | 8.05 | 3.24 | 9.04 |
| 130 | 7.84 | 7.59 | 6.05 | |
| 1300 | 2.77 | 6.80 | 9.01 | |
|
| ||||
| Imperatorin | 20.6 | 4.32 | 2.42 | 5.62 |
| 103 | 8.48 | 3.78 | 6.08 | |
| 1030 | 3.08 | 7.88 | 8.52 | |
|
| ||||
| Osthole | 25.4 | 5.48 | 6.77 | 8.08 |
| 127 | 3.72 | 5.49 | 2.75 | |
| 1270 | 3.54 | 4.70 | 5.28 | |
|
| ||||
| Isoimperatorin | 20 | 4.17 | 3.81 | 5.19 |
| 100 | 2.98 | 7.05 | 6.68 | |
| 1000 | 1.94 | 5.67 | 8.23 | |
|
| ||||
| Columbianadin | 26 | 9.28 | 8.56 | 9.73 |
| 130 | 2.90 | 1.45 | 5.84 | |
| 1300 | 2.98 | 3.14 | 3.25 | |
Table 4.
Repeatability and recovery of the developed method (n = 6).
| Compounds | Reproducibility | Recovery(a) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbal | Capsule | Pill | Herbal | Capsule | Pill | ||||
| RSD (%) | RSD (%) | RSD (%) | Mean | RSD (%) | Mean | RSD (%) | Mean | RSD (%) | |
| Scopoletin | 4.97 | 6.32 | 6.72 | 96.1 | 5.74 | 105 | 1.85 | 101. | 0.62 |
| Umbelliferone | 8.21 | 8.30 | 5.79 | 106 | 3.38 | 95.8 | 5.49 | 97.9 | 6.90 |
| Columbianetin | 4.07 | 9.53 | 5.31 | 110 | 4.09 | 99.3 | 2.69 | 102 | 0.59 |
| Psoralen | 4.71 | 7.86 | 3.81 | 99.8 | 5.66 | 97.2 | 6.44 | 105 | 8.46 |
| Bergapten | 4.09 | 6.41 | 4.56 | 106 | 5.67 | 108 | 0.47 | 101 | 6.95 |
| Xanthotoxin | 3.83 | 6.64 | 4.57 | 105 | 1.15 | 106 | 2.13 | 100 | 2.19 |
| Columbianetin acetate | 5.77 | 8.88 | 2.05 | 87.1 | 3.87 | 105 | 5.14 | 106 | 6.04 |
| Imperatorin | 3.72 | 9.12 | 3.69 | 107 | 1.87 | 104 | 2.60 | 105 | 3.82 |
| Osthole | 5.07 | 7.30 | 4.45 | 106 | 7.71 | 90.3 | 3.62 | 100 | 8.11 |
| Isoimperatorin | 5.10 | 6.48 | 7.16 | 106 | 1.64 | 107 | 0.32 | 105 | 3.28 |
| Columbianadin | 4.75 | 6.64 | 3.82 | 89.9 | 7.31 | 96.4 | 9.09 | 100 | 5.91 |
(a)Recovery (%) = (Amount determined − Amount original)/Amount spiked × 100%.
3.6. Application to Real Samples
The developed LC-MS/MS method was subsequently applied for the analysis of eleven major constituents in eleven batches of commercial samples of RAP and its related preparations (Figure 1). These samples include four RAP, one capsule, and six pills samples. The typical MRM chromatograms of authentic standards Mixed and RAP which were obtained were shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The results of the contents of eleven major constituents in samples of Radix Angelicae Pubescentis and its related preparations were listed in Table 5. The results showed that the contents of eleven major constituents in their related preparations were distinct from those in Radix Angelicae Pubescentis. PPRC 2010 edition established the quality control standards for Radix Angelicae Pubescentis as follows: the osthol and columbianadin contents should not be less than 5, 0.8 mg/g, respectively. The marker compounds contents in these 4 batches of commercial RAP all did not exceed the minimum standards of PPRC. Comparing the contents of active components in preparation with that in raw herbs, most of contents of the active component in related preparations were less than those in RAP except psoralen in the Zhuangguguanjie pills, because psoralen comes from Buguzhi which was another TCM contained in Zuangguguanjie pills. These results suggested that the developed method could be used to evaluate the quality control for this important Chinese herbal medicine and its related preparations.
Figure 1.
Chemical structures of eleven major active constituents.
Table 5.
Results for the determination of the 11 components in sample (mg g−1).
| Sample | Scopoletin | Umbelliferone | Columbianetin | Psoralen | Bergapten | Xanthotoxin | Columbianetin acetate | Imperatorin | Osthole | Isoimperatorin | Columbianadin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Tr | 0.0200 | 0.1342 | 0.0546 | 0.0647 | 0.1140 | 0.7756 | 0.1353 | 3.8504 | 0.0513 | 0.4829 |
| S2 | 0.0034 | 0.0210 | 0.1199 | 0.0829 | 0.1430 | 0.5377 | 0.7525 | 0.1069 | 3.8064 | 0.0545 | 0.6304 |
| S3 | 0.0040 | 0.05810 | 0.1822 | 0.0489 | 0.0766 | 0.2560 | 0.6022 | 0.0479 | 2.6000 | 0.0403 | 0.6289 |
| S4 | Tr | 0.07020 | 0.1232 | 0.0484 | 0.0320 | 0.0510 | 0.6865 | 0.0543 | 2.3652 | 0.0127 | 0.6249 |
| S5 | 0.0408 | Tr | 0.0269 | 0.1756 | 0.0021 | 0.04 | Tr | Tr | Tr | 0.006 | 0.0084 |
| S6 | 0.0011 | Tr | 0.0142 | 0.0056 | 0.0043 | 0.0005 | 0.0006 | 0.02 | 0.0030 | 0.0009 | 0.0038 |
| S7 | 0.0019 | 0.0069 | 0.0194 | 0.0018 | 0.0024 | 0.0020 | 0.0135 | 0.0537 | 0.0720 | 0.0030 | 0.0385 |
| S8 | Tr | 0.0062 | 0.0046 | 0.0008 | Tr | 0.0010 | 0.0026 | 0.0038 | 0.0125 | 0.0006 | 0.0075 |
| S9 | Tr | Tr | 0.0013 | 0.0014 | Tr | 0.0006 | 0.0024 | Tr | 0.0153 | 0.0002 | 0.0053 |
| S10 | 0.0004 | Tr | 0.0170 | 0.0023 | 0.0006 | 0.0020 | 0.0047 | Tr | 0.0374 | 0.0002 | 0.0067 |
| S11 | 0.0003 | 0.0028 | 0.0173 | 0.2475 | 0.0012 | 0.0040 | 0.0117 | 0.0004 | 0.0413 | 0.0006 | 0.1052 |
Tr: Trace.
4. Conclusion
The proposed method made it possible to determine simultaneously the eleven main bioactive components in samples of RAP and its related preparations in one run with acceptable levels of linearity, precision, repeatability, and accuracy. It was the first report to reveal the distribution of eleven chemical constitutes in RAP and its related preparations by the LC-MS/MS analytical method. The results demonstrated that the developed method could be applied as a reliable and sensitive quality control for this important Chinese herbal medicine and its related preparations.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20101210120007), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (20100480657), Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Students' Science and Technology Innovation Foundation (CXJJ2013C17), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81374050).
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests in the paper.
References
- 1.Chen Y.-F., Tsai H.-Y., Wu T.-S. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities from roots of Angelica pubescens . Planta Medica. 1995;61(1):2–8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wei F., Zou S., Young A., Dubner R., Ren K. Effects of four herbal extracts on adjuvant-induced inflammation and hyperalgesia in rats. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 1999;5(5):429–436. doi: 10.1089/acm.1999.5.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu Y.-T., Wang F., Wang G.-X., Han J., Wang Y., Wang Y.-H. In vivo anthelmintic activity of crude extracts of Radix angelicae pubescentis, Fructus bruceae, Caulis spatholobi, Semen aesculi, and Semen pharbitidis against Dactylogyrus intermedius (Monogenea) in goldfish (Carassius auratus) Parasitology Research. 2010;106(5):1233–1239. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1799-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang K.-Y., Yao L., Du Y.-H., Xie J.-B., Huang J.-L., Yin Z.-Q. Anthelmintic activity of the crude extracts, fractions, and osthole from Radix angelicae pubescentis against Dactylogyrus intermedius in goldfish (Carassius auratus) in vivo. Parasitology Research. 2011;108(1):195–200. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu J. H., Zschocke S., Reininger E., Bauer R. Inhibitory effects of Angelica pubescens f. biserrata on 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase. Planta Medica. 1998;64(6):525–529. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cameron M., Gagnier J. J., Little C. V., Parsons T. J., Blümle A., Chrubasik S. Evidence of effectiveness of herbal medicinal products in the treatment of arthritis—part 1: osteoarthritis. Phytotherapy Research. 2009;23(11):1497–1515. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li M., Wei B. W., Qin L., et al. Studies on the antiosteoarthritis and analgesia of Zhonghua Diedawan in rats and rabbits. China Tropical Medicine. 2007;7:2316–2318. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xing J., Hu X. J., Zhao C. J., Song M., Li L. Determination of osthole and isoimperatorin in Anegelica pubescens Maxim .f. biserrate Shan et Yuan by RP-HPLC. Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University. 2006;23:93–96. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sha Z. F., Sun W. J., Gao H., Miao M. L. Determination of osthole and columbianetin acetate in Angelica pubescens by reversed phase HPLC. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 1991;26(10):798–800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ding X. F., Feng X., Dong Y. F., Zhao X. Z., Chen Y., Wang M. A new angelol-type coumarin glucoside from Angelica pubescens . Chinese Chemical Letters. 2008;19(10):1237–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2008.07.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang C. Y., Zhang B. G., Yang X. W. Studies on the chemical constituents of the root of Angelica pubescens f. biserrata . Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army. 2007;23:241–245. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang X. W., Guo Q. M., Zhang C. Y., Zhang B. G. Further studies on the chemical constituents of the root of angelica pubescens f. biserrata. Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army. 2008;24:389–393. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zaugg J., Eickmeier E., Rueda D. C., Hering S., Hamburger M. HPLC-based activity profiling of Angelica pubescens roots for new positive GABAA receptor modulators in Xenopus oocytes. Fitoterapia. 2011;82(3):434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu J.-H., Xu S.-X., Yao X.-S., Kobayashi H. Angelol-type coumarins from Angelica pubescence f. biserrata and their inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation. Phytochemistry. 1995;39(5):1099–1101. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jeong H.-J., Na H.-J., Kim S.-J., et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of columbianetin on activated human mast cells. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2009;32(6):1027–1031. doi: 10.1248/bpb.32.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abraham K., Wöhrlin F., Lindtner O., Heinemeyer G., Lampen A. Toxicology and risk assessment of coumarin: focus on human data. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research. 2010;54(2):228–239. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.da Silva V. B., Kawano D. F., Carvalho I., da Conceição E. C., de Freitas O., da Silva C. H. T. D. P. Psoralen and bergapten: in silico metabolism and toxicophoric analysis of drugs used to treat vitiligo. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009;12(3):378–387. doi: 10.18433/j3w01d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guh J.-H., Yu S.-M., Ko F.-N., Wu T.-S., Teng C.-M. Antiproliferative effect in rat vascular smooth muscle cells by osthole, isolated from Angelica pubescens . European Journal of Pharmacology. 1996;298(2):191–197. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00812-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guo F.-Q., Huang L.-F., Zhou H.-F., Jiang Q.-J. Extraction optimization of coumarins from radix angelicae pubescentis by HPLC-DAD coupled with uniform design. Journal of Central South University of Technology. 2006;13(2):156–159. doi: 10.1007/s11771-006-0148-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu Y.-N., Luan L.-B. In situ rats single pass perfusion intestinal absorption of the effective components in Radix Angelicae Pubescentis. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 2008;43(1):102–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vogl S., Zehl M., Picker P., et al. Identification and quantification of coumarins in Peucedanum ostruthium (L.) Koch by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-DAD-MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011;59(9):4371–4377. doi: 10.1021/jf104772x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Y. C., Xu H. Y., Chen X. M., et al. Simultaneous quantification of 17 constituents from Yuanhu Zhitong tablet using rapid resolution liquid chromatography coupled with a triple quadrupole electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2011;56(3):497–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yang W., Feng C., Kong D., et al. Simultaneous and sensitive determination of xanthotoxin, psoralen, isoimpinellin and bergapten in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2010;878(5-6):575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chang Y.-X., Zhang Q.-H., Li J., et al. Simultaneous determination of scopoletin, psoralen, bergapten, xanthotoxin, columbianetin acetate, imperatorin, osthole and isoimperatorin in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS for pharmacokinetic studies following oral administration of Radix Angelicae Pubescentis extract. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2013;77:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]