Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2015 Jun 2;6(3):e00551-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00551-15

Defining the Roles of TcdA and TcdB in Localized Gastrointestinal Disease, Systemic Organ Damage, and the Host Response during Clostridium difficile Infections

Glen P Carter a, Anjana Chakravorty a, Tu Anh Pham Nguyen b, Steven Mileto a, Fernanda Schreiber b, Lucy Li a, Pauline Howarth a, Simon Clare b, Bliss Cunningham a, Susan P Sambol c,d, Adam Cheknis c,d, Iris Figueroa c,d, Stuart Johnson c,d, Dale Gerding c,d, Julian I Rood a, Gordon Dougan b, Trevor D Lawley b, Dena Lyras a,
Editors: Jimmy D Ballarde, R John Collierf
PMCID: PMC4453007  PMID: 26037121

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, a significant animal pathogen, and a worldwide public health burden. Most disease-causing strains secrete two exotoxins, TcdA and TcdB, which are considered to be the primary virulence factors. Understanding the role that these toxins play in disease is essential for the rational design of urgently needed new therapeutics. However, their relative contributions to disease remain contentious. Using three different animal models, we show that TcdA+ TcdB mutants are attenuated in virulence in comparison to the wild-type (TcdA+ TcdB+) strain, whereas TcdA TcdB+ mutants are fully virulent. We also show for the first time that TcdB alone is associated with both severe localized intestinal damage and systemic organ damage, suggesting that this toxin might be responsible for the onset of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), a poorly characterized but often fatal complication of C. difficile infection (CDI). Finally, we show that TcdB is the primary factor responsible for inducing the in vivo host innate immune and inflammatory responses. Surprisingly, the animal infection model used was found to profoundly influence disease outcomes, a finding which has important ramifications for the validation of new therapeutics and future disease pathogenesis studies. Overall, our results show unequivocally that TcdB is the major virulence factor of C. difficile and provide new insights into the host response to C. difficile during infection. The results also highlight the critical nature of using appropriate and, when possible, multiple animal infection models when studying bacterial virulence mechanisms.

IMPORTANCE

Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and an important hospital pathogen. TcdA and TcdB are thought to be the primary virulence factors responsible for disease symptoms of C. difficile infections (CDI). However, the individual contributions of these toxins to disease remain contentious. Using three different animal models of infection, we show for the first time that TcdB alone causes severe damage to the gut, as well as systemic organ damage, suggesting that this toxin might be responsible for MODS, a serious but poorly understood complication of CDI. These findings provide important new insights into the host response to C. difficile during infection and should guide the rational development of urgently required nonantibiotic therapeutics for the treatment of CDI.

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired infection with the Gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium Clostridium difficile is a major global public and veterinary health concern. This pathogen causes severe gastrointestinal illness and death and is the most significant cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea in many countries, which places a considerable economic burden on health care systems (1). The importance of C. difficile occurrence in animals has also recently become apparent, with disease or carriage identified in domestic animals, including pigs, cattle, horses, and companion animals (2, 3). C. difficile causes a spectrum of gastrointestinal diseases, collectively known as C. difficile infections (CDI), which can range from mild diarrhea through moderately serious disease to severe pseudomembranous colitis (1). Unlike the case for other enteric pathogens, disease is almost always associated with antimicrobial therapy. Importantly, the increase in antibiotic-resistant so-called “superbugs” in recent years has led to much higher usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Paradoxically, treating these superbugs has left patients vulnerable to infection by opportunistic pathogens, such as C. difficile.

After infection is established, most C. difficile strains produce two major toxins, TcdA and TcdB, which are encoded by the tcdA and tcdB genes and are both members of the large clostridial cytotoxin family. These toxins are potent monoglucosyltransferases that irreversibly modify members of the Rho family of host regulatory proteins, leading to disruption of downstream signaling pathways and cell death (4). Infection with toxigenic C. difficile strains therefore causes extensive colonic inflammation and epithelial tissue damage. The net effect is rapid fluid loss into the intestinal lumen, which manifests as diarrhea (4). C. difficile isolates that produce TcdB but not TcdA have emerged and continue to be isolated; these isolates cause the full clinical spectrum of CDI despite only producing one of the major toxins (5). Many human and animal strains also produce a third toxin, binary toxin or CDT, encoded by the cdtA and cdtB genes (6). The role of this toxin during infection and disease remains to be elucidated; however, recent studies suggest that this toxin may play a role in adherence and colonization of C. difficile in the host (6).

In the absence of methods to genetically manipulate C. difficile, early disease studies involved the intragastric administration of purified toxins to animals. This research suggested that TcdA was the major virulence factor and that TcdB played a less important role in disease (7). This hypothesis was challenged upon the emergence of naturally occurring variant strains that did not produce TcdA but did produce TcdB (TcdA TcdB+) that caused fulminant human CDI (5). Two recent infection studies in hamsters attempted to clarify the roles of TcdA and TcdB in disease by using isogenic toxin mutants constructed in the low-virulence clinical isolate 630 (8, 9). The first study found that TcdB alone resulted in disease (9), while the second concluded that both TcdB and TcdA could individually cause severe disease (8). More recently, a third study using isogenic mutants constructed in strain R20291, an epidemic BI/NAP1/027 strain, together with a hamster infection model also concluded that both toxins could cause fulminant disease independently (10). A number of possibilities could explain the discrepancies in the first two studies, such as genetic differences in the C. difficile 630-derived strains, differences in animal challenge protocols, or variations in the intestinal microbiota of animals at different research facilities, which can substantially influence infection outcomes (11). As a consequence, it was suggested that the same panel of strains should be virulence tested in multiple laboratories to minimize the impact of experimental variation (12). To address these disparities and comprehensively define the contributions of TcdA and TcdB to disease, we used three independent animal models to study the relative virulence of a new group of isogenic C. difficile toxin gene mutants derived from a Canadian epidemic C. difficile BI/NAP1/027 isolate (strain M7404) that had not been extensively laboratory passaged.

RESULTS

Construction and characterization of tcdA, tcdB, and cdtA toxin gene mutants in a BI/NAP1/027 clinical isolate.

Two independent tcdA (TcdA TcdB+) and tcdB (TcdA+ TcdB) mutants (mutants 1 and 2 for each) and a tcdAB (TcdA TcdB) double mutant were constructed in strain M7404. Like all BI/NAP1/027 isolates, this strain encodes a third toxin, CDT, an ADP-ribosyltransferase binary toxin (13), which was disrupted separately by mutagenesis of the cdtA gene (CDT). Before virulence testing, each mutant was genotypically confirmed by PCR (data not shown) and Southern hybridization analysis, which confirmed the specific targetron insertions (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Western immunoblot analyses (see Fig. S2) together with Vero and HT29 cell cytotoxicity and neutralization assays (see Fig. S3 and S4) then confirmed the expected toxin profile of each mutant compared to that of the wild type. No differences in the sporulation frequencies of the mutant and wild-type strains were detected (see Table S1).

TcdB-producing strains are more virulent than tcdB-deficient isogenic mutants in mouse and hamster infection models.

To maximize the robustness of the infection outcomes, we used three different animal models, performed in three independent laboratories. First, an optimized mouse infection model, based on a previously published model (14) and further developed at Monash University (Australia), in which animals consistently develop severe disease was used. Infection with the wild type (TcdA+ TcdB+) and the TcdA TcdB+ mutants resulted in marked weight loss (Fig. 1A), with 100% and 95% of mice, respectively, dying within 48 h, rising to 100% for the latter group by 72 h (Fig. 1B). These animals also showed other signs of severe disease, such as shallow and labored breathing, profuse diarrhea, and isolation from littermates (Fig. 1C). In contrast, only moderate weight loss was recorded for TcdA+ TcdB strain-infected mice (Fig. 1A); significantly more (80%) of these animals survived than did wild-type strain-infected animals (log rank test, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1B), and they showed significantly less signs of physiological distress (Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1C). Importantly, a 500-fold-higher infectious dose of the TcdA+ TcdB strain did not elicit more severe disease outcomes (see Fig. S5A and B in the supplemental material) than the lower dose (Fig. 1A and B). Finally, TcdA TcdB strain-infected mice lost no weight (Fig. 1A), survived the infection (Fig. 1B), and exhibited no other disease signs (Fig. 1C). As with the TcdA+ TcdB strain-infected mice, the results for survival and physiological distress were significantly different in TcdA TcdB strain-infected mice than in mice infected with the wild-type strain (P < 0.0001 for both survival and distress). Statistical analysis using a Mann-Whitney test subsequently showed that mice infected with TcdB-producing strains had significantly shorter colons than mock-infected mice (P < 0.0001 for the wild-type strain, P = 0.004 and P < 0.001 for TcdA TcdB+ mutants 1 and 2, and P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 for CDT mutants 1 and 2) (Fig. 1D), a common feature in mouse models of ulcerative colitis (15). The colon lengths in the TcdA+ TcdB (P = 0.345 and P = 0.540) and TcdA TcdB (P = 0.862) strain-infected mice were statistically the same as in mock-infected mice (Fig. 1D).

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Toxin B is the primary mediator of fulminant C. difficile disease. (A to D) Monash mice were infected with C. difficile strains. Results for the strains are indicated by different colors as follows: black, wild-type strain M7404 [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (n = 19); light blue, tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (n = 14); dark blue, tcdB mutant 2 (TcdA+B2) (n = 10); pink, tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (n = 13); purple, tcdA mutant 2 (TcdAB+2) (n = 10); green, tcdA tcdB double mutant (TcdAB) (n = 15); light orange, cdtA mutant 1 (CDT1) (n = 10); dark orange, cdtA mutant 2 (CDT2) (n = 10); and gray, mock-infected control (mock) (n = 5). Results are shown for weight loss (A), survival (B), activity and appearance (C), and colon length (D) of infected Monash mice. (E) Survival of Sanger mice infected with C. difficile strains indicated by different colors as follows: black, wild-type TcdA+ TcdB+ strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (n = 16); light blue, TcdA+ TcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (n = 16); pink, TcdA TcdB+ mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (n = 13); light orange, cdtA mutant 1 (CDT1) (n = 15); and gray, mock infected (n = 15). (F) Days from infection to death of Hines hamsters infected with C. difficile strains indicated by different colors as follows: black, wild-type TcdA+ TcdB+ strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (n = 8); light blue, TcdA+ TcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (n = 9); pink, TcdA TcdB+ mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (n = 9); and light orange, cdtA mutant 1 (CDT1) (n = 10). Data represent the mean results ± standard deviations (SD).

Disease resulting from infection with the CDT mutants was indistinguishable from disease caused by the wild type for each parameter analyzed (Fig. 1A to D). Note that in all subsequent animal infection experiments, only one TcdA TcdB+, TcdA+ TcdB, or CDT mutant was assessed since the infection phenotypes between the independent mutants using the Monash model were identical.

Strain virulence was next tested at the Sanger Institute (United Kingdom), using a different mouse infection model in which animals typically develop self-limiting intestinal inflammation and rarely progress to severe disease or death (16). Unexpectedly, 40% of TcdA TcdB+ strain-infected mice succumbed to acute infection within 48 h, which was a significantly higher rate than for mice infected with the wild-type strain (log rank test, P = 0.015) (Fig. 1E). In contrast, animals infected with the wild-type, TcdA+ TcdB, TcdA TcdB, or CDT strain all survived the infection (Fig. 1E).

Finally, the hamster model of CDI developed at Hines VA Hospital and used in earlier studies (9) was used here. In contrast to the mouse infection results, all infected hamsters died irrespective of the infecting strain (Fig. 1F). However, a significant delay (log rank test, P = 0.0015) was evident in the time from colonization to death of TcdA+ TcdB strain-infected animals (1.33 ± 0.16 days [mean ± standard deviation]) compared to the time to death for wild-type strain-infected animals (0.43 ± 0.16 days). There was no statistical difference in the time to death of TcdA TcdB+ (0.8 ± 0.13 days) or CDT (0.28 ± 0.12 days) strain-infected animals compared to the time to death of wild-type strain-infected animals (Fig. 1F). These results indicate that in the hamster model of infection, only the TcdA+ TcdB mutant was attenuated in virulence, which agreed with our previous data using toxin mutants in C. difficile strain 630 (9).

To ensure that each strain used in this analysis germinated and colonized the infected hosts with equal efficiency, the colonization efficiencies of the tcdA (TcdA TcdB+ mutant 1) and tcdB (TcdA+ TcdB mutant 1) mutants in comparison to that of the wild-type M7404 TcdA+ TcdB+ strain in the Monash mouse model of CDI and the Hines VA Hospital hamster infection model were determined. No differences were seen in either mice or hamsters, confirming that such differences were not responsible for disease attenuation resulting from infection with the TcdA+ TcdB mutants (see Fig. S6A and D in the supplemental material). Competition assays were also performed in which Monash mice were simultaneously infected with equal numbers of the tcdA (TcdA TcdB+ mutant 1) and tcdB (TcdA+ TcdB mutant 1) mutants to determine whether either strain was reduced in fitness in vivo (see Fig. S6E). As expected, both strains were found to be equally fit in vivo, with competitive index (CI) values of 1.178 ± 0.267 and 1.119 ± 0.361 obtained at 24 h and 48 h after infection, respectively. This result confirms that the attenuated virulence of the TcdA+ TcdB mutants is not due to reduced in vivo fitness of these strains. Finally, to confirm that the toxin levels produced by the mutant strains were equivalent to those produced by the wild-type strain in vivo, TcdA- and TcdB-specific cytotoxicity assays were performed on the luminal contents of mice infected with each strain (see Fig. S6B and C). Each strain was found to produce the expected toxin in vivo, at levels that were not significantly different from the levels detected from the wild-type strain.

Infection with TcdB-producing strains causes severe gut and distal organ damage.

Previous studies assessing the roles of TcdA and TcdB in disease did not investigate histological damage arising in the gut as a consequence of CDI. Here, the microscopic effects of TcdA, TcdB, and CDT on the gut—in colonic and cecal tissues from Monash mice and cecal tissues from Sanger mice, collected 2 and 4 days postinfection, respectively—were examined by histopathology. Similar observations were made for both groups, with the wild type and the TcdA TcdB+ mutants all causing severe gut damage associated with eroded and often absent crypts, mucosal ulceration, and goblet cell loss (Fig. 2A). Polymorphonuclear cell (PMN) influx into the lamina propria, enterocyte hyperplasia, and severe submucosal edema associated with hemorrhage were also seen (Fig. 2A). In contrast, TcdB-negative strains caused limited tissue damage that was confined to mild edema and PMN influx (Fig. 2A), even when a 500-fold increased dose of the TcdA+ TcdB strain relative to the dose of the wild type was used (see Fig. S5C to E in the supplemental material). All of the damage was TcdB- or TcdA-induced, since tissues from TcdA TcdB strain-infected mice resembled those from mock-infected control mice (Fig. 2A). Independent histological scoring confirmed these observations, with TcdB-producing strains eliciting the greatest injury and strains only producing TcdA causing less damage (Fig. 2B and C). Statistical analysis using a Mann-Whitney test showed significantly less intestinal damage than in wild-type strain-infected mice only in animals infected with the TcdA+ TcdB mutants (P = 0.0022 and P = 0.0043) and the TcdA TcdB mutant (P = 0.0022) in the Monash model of CDI and in the TcdA+ TcdB mutant-infected mice (P < 0.0001) in the Sanger model of CDI. Histopathological scoring of tissues from CDT strain-infected mice resembled the results for wild-type strain-infected mice (Fig. 2B and C).

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Toxin B causes severe local histopathological damage. Histopathological analyses of tissues collected from mice infected with the wild-type strain M7404 [TcdA+B+ (WT)], tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B), tcdA tcdB double mutant (TcdAB), or cdtA mutant 1 (CDT1) or mock infected with PBS were performed. (A) Representative images of hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained tissues from Monash mice on day 2 postinfection and from Sanger mice on day 4 postinfection are shown. Scale bars are shown (200 µm). (B) Histopathological scoring of damage to tissues from Monash mice infected with the wild-type and mutant C. difficile strains. Scores are shown for tissues from mice infected with the TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT) strain (n = 12), TcdA+ TcdB mutant 1 (n = 6), TcdA+ TcdB mutant 2 (n = 5), TcdA TcdB+ mutant 1 (n = 6), TcdA TcdB+ mutant 2 (n = 6), TcdA TcdB double mutant (n = 6), CDT mutant 1 (n = 5), and CDT mutant 2 (n = 5) and from mock-infected mice (n = 6). All values are mean results ± SD. (C) Histopathological scoring of damage to tissues in Sanger mice infected with wild-type and mutant C. difficile strains. Scores are shown for tissues from mice infected with the TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT) strain (n = 12), TcdA+ TcdB mutant 1 (n = 12), TcdA TcdB+ mutant 1 (n = 8), and CDT mutant 1 (n = 12) and from mock-infected mice (n = 12). All values are mean results ± SD.

C. difficile infection can cause multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (17, 18), but the role of toxins is unknown. Organs were therefore collected from Monash CDI model mice and their histopathology examined; 88% of wild-type strain-infected and 80% of TcdA TcdB+ strain-infected mice had damage to the thymus, sagittal lymph nodes, spleen, or kidneys (Fig. 3A). No organ damage was detected in mice infected with the TcdA+ TcdB or TcdA TcdB strain or mock-infected mice (Fig. 3A). To determine whether an increased amount of TcdA could elicit systemic effects similar to those observed with TcdB-producing strains, mice infected with a 500-fold higher infectious dose of the TcdA+ TcdB strain were also examined; however, no organ damage was detected (see Fig. S5C in the supplemental material). Infection with TcdB-producing strains was particularly devastating to the thymus, as evidenced by a complete loss of medullary and cortical junctions and widespread lymphocyte apoptosis (Fig. 3B). In severe cases, there were also signs of lymphoid necrosis (lymphorrexhis) found outside the secondary follicles and associated with phagocytic macrophages. Similarly, in wild-type strain- and TcdA TcdB+ strain-infected mice, sagittal lymph nodes showed a reactive phenotype categorized by the presence of lymphocytic apoptosis, areas of lymphoid depletion, and focal regions of macrophage aggregates and multinucleated giant cells, as well as a decrease in the number and size of lymphoid follicles and a marked absence of germinal centers (Fig. 3B). Mild lymphocyte apoptosis was also observed in splenic tissue isolated from mice infected with the wild type and the TcdA TcdB+ mutant (Fig. 3B), with focal areas of tissue showing loss of red and white pulp morphology, as well as an increase in tingible body macrophages and periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths (PALS). Kidney damage was only seen in wild type-infected mice, where capsular lesions were observed.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

C. difficile infection with TcdB-producing strains is associated with multiorgan damage. (A) Organs were collected from Monash mice and assessed for damage compared to the state of control tissues, and the data collated. (B) Representative images of organ tissues collected from Monash CDI mice infected with wild-type strain M7404 [TcdA+B+ (WT)], tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B), or tcdA tcdB double mutant (TcdAB) or mock infected with PBS. Note the loss of structure in medullary and cortical regions in the thymus (M, medulla, C, cortex) and in the germinal centers (Gc) of the sagittal lymph nodes (SG Lns). Scale bars are shown (thymus, 500 µm; spleen, 200 µm; SG Lns and kidney, 100 µm).

Infection with C. difficile toxin gene mutants elicits unique host response signatures.

To further explore the effects of TcdA and TcdB on the host, we studied the immune response transcriptomic signatures seen in the large intestinal tissues collected from Monash and Sanger wild-type, TcdA TcdB+, and TcdA+ TcdB strain- and mock-infected mice (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Tissues collected from CDT strain-infected mice were not included in this analysis, since CDT appears to have little effect on virulence under the conditions tested in this study. Hierarchical clustering of samples showed that most TcdA TcdB+ strain-infected tissues displayed expression profiles similar to those of wild-type strain-infected tissues, whereas TcdA+ TcdB strain-infected samples clustered closely with mock-infected tissues, consistent with the attenuated virulence phenotype of the TcdA+ TcdB strains (Fig. 4). Infection with TcdB-producing strains (wild-type and TcdA TcdB+ strains) induced expression changes in a diverse group of host genes involved in the innate immune response, inflammation, and cellular apoptosis. These included s100a8, lcn2, cxcl1, il1b, and duox2, which encode the S100 calcium binding protein, lipocalin 2, chemokine ligand 1, interleukin 1β, and dual oxidase 2, respectively. In the absence of TcdB, these genes did not appear to be differentially regulated. Importantly, however, the expression of many of these genes was higher following infection with the wild-type strain than with the TcdA TcdB+ mutant, suggesting that TcdA, as well as TcdB, is involved in modulating the host innate immune and inflammatory response to C. difficile infection. Many genes involved in cellular metabolism were also differentially regulated in response to CDI, including genes encoding enzymes such as synthases, methyltransferases, oxidases, carboxypeptidases, and dehydrogenases. In addition, a profound effect on cellular detoxification pathways was noted, with a number of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase genes (ugt1a6b, ugt1a6a, ugt1a1, ugt1a7c, ugt1a10, ugt2b36, and ugt2b35), cytochrome P450 family protein-encoding genes (cyp2c55, cyp2c65, cyp4b1, cyp4f14, cyp2d12, cyp3a13, cyp2d22, and cyp2d26), and carboxylesterase genes (ces1f, ces2, ces1d, and ces2e) significantly downregulated. Although unrelated, these protein families play a key role in protecting host cells from damage caused by endogenous and exogenous toxins, as well as being involved in the removal of xenobiotic substances (1921). Finally, several genes encoding solute carrier (SLC) family proteins (slc37a1, slc26a3, slc17a4, slc39a5, slc30a10, slc26a2, slc40a1, slc16a5, slc9a2, slc02b1, slc16a9, and slc5a6) were also found to be downregulated, predominantly in response to infection with the wild-type strain and the TcdA TcdB+ mutant. These proteins play a key role in many central metabolic cellular processes since they are involved in the transport of a variety of substrates, such as sugars, inorganic ions, nucleotides, and amino acids (22). Collectively, these data highlight the profound effect that C. difficile infections have on central processes within host epithelial cells, particularly in response to TcdB. Furthermore, unique signatures of the host response to each toxin mutant strain were identified, suggesting that clinical C. difficile strains might elicit differential host responses depending on the combination of toxins produced by the infecting strain.

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Transcriptomic analysis of the host response during C. difficile infection. Heat maps of the transcriptomes of colonic tissues collected from mice following infection with the wild-type strain M7404 [TcdA+B+ (WT)], tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B), or tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+) or mock infection with PBS using the Monash mouse model (A) or the Sanger mouse model (B) of CDI. Scaled expression values within the heat maps are color coded according to the color range shown, with red being the lowest and green being the highest level of transcription. The dendrogram shown above each heat map depicts hierarchical clustering of the transcriptomic response of each mouse following infection and was derived using a Pearson hierarchical-clustering algorithm. The infecting strains are indicated underneath the individual heat maps.

DISCUSSION

Over the last 30 years, most studies defining the roles played by the C. difficile major toxins in disease utilized purified TcdA or TcdB and their direct administration to animals or application to cell lines, which provided invaluable insights into the mechanism of action of each of the toxins. It has only been in the last decade, however, that genetic manipulation technology has allowed toxin gene mutants to be constructed, facilitating hamster infection studies that have allowed the roles of the toxins to be more accurately defined (8, 9, 23). These infection studies all suggested that TcdB plays a more important role in disease than suggested by the earlier work involving purified toxins (810, 24). The study presented here has further defined the roles of TcdA and TcdB and has also assessed the role of CDT binary toxin in CDI, using three different animal models of disease. This work comprehensively shows that both TcdA and TcdB play a role in disease pathogenesis but that TcdB is the major virulence factor and causes severe host damage and disease in all animal models. In contrast, the CDT binary toxin appears to play a minor role in CDI under the experimental conditions used in this study, although other studies have suggested that this toxin can enhance colonization (25) or cause tissue damage in a small number of animals in a hamster CDI model (10). It is clear from this and other studies that CDT is not a major virulence factor, with a minority of virulent strains producing this toxin (13). Furthermore, a previous study has shown that TcdA- and TcdB-negative but CDT-positive strains are avirulent in the hamster infection model (26). The design of future experiments to clarify the role of CDT during infection will need to be carefully considered, since they will need to capture the subtle and synergistic effects that this toxin is likely to be exerting on the host. At this time, however, the role of CDT in C. difficile infection and disease pathogenesis remains undefined.

Although many of the recent infection studies have unquestionably clarified the role of TcdB in CDI and showed that TcdB function does not depend on the presence of TcdA, the role of TcdA itself is less apparent (810, 24). Here, we clearly show in all three infection models that TcdA plays a less important role than TcdB in CDI caused by BI/NAP1/027 C. difficile isolates. Histopathological analysis of cecal and colonic tissues collected from infected mice showed that TcdB was responsible for the majority of intestinal damage arising during infection, with TcdA causing more superficial and localized damage. This finding contrasts with previous suggestions that TcdA is the primary cause of damage to the colonic niche during the course of a C. difficile infection (8), although it agrees with other research that showed that TcdB is a more potent enterotoxin than TcdA in human intestinal explants (27). Unexpectedly, this work has also identified a role for TcdA in modulating the severe effects of TcdB in the Sanger murine CDI model. Using this model, mice infected with the TcdA TcdB+ strain succumbed to infection, while those infected with the wild-type or the TcdA+ TcdB mutant strain did not. This observation aligns with previous clinical observations suggesting that naturally occurring TcdA TcdB+ strains are capable of causing more severe disease than some TcdA+ TcdB+ strains (5). Furthermore, a recent study showed that the administration of TcdA neutralizing antibodies in piglets with CDI resulted in more severe disease than in untreated animals (28). While further work is needed to determine the mechanism by which TcdA modulates the effects of TcdB, the simplest explanation may be one of competition: TcdA intoxication of cells may prevent TcdB from acting on the same cells, thereby limiting the pool of cells on which TcdB can act and consequently reducing disease severity. Regardless, these observations have important implications for the development of next-generation, nonantibiotic, toxin-directed CDI therapeutics, because they suggest that these approaches should focus on both TcdA and TcdB or TcdB alone since targeting only TcdA may return adverse clinical outcomes. The increasing isolation of clinical and veterinary TcdA TcdB+ variants also reinforces the need for the development of TcdB-based therapies.

The severity of disease caused by TcdB-producing strains may result from the extraintestinal organ damage that is caused by infection with these strains. These systemic effects were absent in mice challenged with C. difficile strains that did not produce TcdB. These observations align with previous findings showing that TcdB is cardiotoxic in a zebrafish embryo model of intoxication (29) and a study showing that the administration of TcdB-specific antibodies lessened the systemic effects of CDI in a piglet infection model (28). Furthermore, another study showed that both TcdA and TcdB could disseminate from the gut during infection with a strain that produced both toxins, leading to systemic toxemia (18). Our results suggest that TcdB is the factor responsible for systemic dissemination and damage and may therefore be responsible for the onset of MODS, a severe complication of CDI that is associated with high mortality rates. Although this study cannot discern whether extraintestinal damage is directly mediated by TcdB or is a consequence of toxin-induced “leaky gut” that compromises gut integrity and allows the systemic dispersal of microbial components (30), including other toxins, it is clear that TcdB alone is associated with systemic and severe disease.

The systemic effects of infection with TcdB-producing C. difficile strains extended to many organs, including lymphoid tissues and, in particular, the thymus. Thymic injury during infection with other pathogens has been described (1416) and can be associated with poor outcomes postrecovery (31). Thymic atrophy associated with infectious diseases can result in temporary lymphocyte depletion and altered circulating T-cell populations, which is of little consequence in healthy individuals where the thymus and immune functions are restored rapidly following infection. However, age-related thymic involution can result in an inability to restore immune function following infection (31). CDI effects on the thymus may influence immune function postinfection in a similar way, resulting in an increased risk of disease relapse or secondary infections, such as funguria or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections, which are associated with CDI patients (32, 33). This finding is particularly relevant to elderly patients, a group at significant risk for CDI (34) who have already undergone thymic atrophy (31).

Transcriptomic analysis of mice infected with the wild-type and mutant strains revealed that TcdB is the major factor inducing host innate immune and proinflammatory responses. These responses were generally stronger in mice infected with the wild-type strain than in those infected with the TcdA TcdB+ derivative, suggesting that TcdA also plays a role in upregulating these responses, which agrees with similar studies using purified toxins (35, 36). Of note, TcdB was recently shown to induce cellular apoptosis via NADPH oxidase-mediated production of reactive superoxide species, and a reduction in reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity protected colonic explants from TcdB-induced damage (37). Although upregulation of NADPH oxidase genes was not detected in our study, one of the most upregulated pathways following infection was found to be Duox2, which produces ROS in a way similar to NADPH oxidase. Duox2 is predominantly expressed in gastrointestinal epithelial cells, where it plays an important role in host defense against invading pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Helicobacter spp., through the inducible production of hydrogen peroxide and ROS (38). As with NADPH oxidase (37), it appears that TcdB might induce aberrant activation of the Duox2 pathway within the intestinal epithelium during infection. Since ROS is known to cause organ damage and is also implicated in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal conditions, such as small intestine ischemia and ulcerative colitis (3941), it is possible that the uncontrolled Duox2-mediated burst of H2O2 and ROS resulting from C. difficile infection with TcdB-producing strains contributes to gut damage. Although further work is needed to understand the role that upregulation of Duox2 may play in C. difficile-induced gut damage, this pathway may represent a novel therapeutic target for reducing the level of gastrointestinal damage during CDI by reducing ROS production. Similar approaches have been used to develop a promising class of novel therapeutics that inhibit NADPH oxidases for the treatment of numerous inflammatory diseases and cancers (42, 43).

Overall, our results have important implications for the development and validation of treatment agents for CDI and for disease pathogenesis studies. Genetically, C. difficile is a heterogeneous species, with new disease-causing variants emerging regularly. Although many cases of CDI are acquired within hospitals, recent molecular epidemiological studies have shown that many other environmental sources may contribute to the infection reservoir. Regardless of the environmental source, TcdB appears to be the only toxin common to all current and emerging human and animal disease-causing isolates (4446), reinforcing the outcomes presented here and the need for TcdB-targeted therapeutics. Our results also support the use of multiple animal infection models for the purpose of comprehensive evaluation of therapeutics. Finally, despite being an infection that is confined to the gut, C. difficile infection is clearly shown by this work to cause damage to organs distal to the infection site, and this work also provides new insights into the systemic host damage that can occur as a consequence of a localized gastrointestinal infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction and characterization of toxin gene mutants.

The tcdA, tcdB, and tcdAB C. difficile mutants were made using targetron technology and utilizing appropriately retargeted derivatives of plasmid pDLL1 and conjugative matings from a B. subtilis BS34A donor strain, as previously described (23). For isolation of the double toxin mutant, antibiotic selection could not be used, and so this strain was detected by PCR screening for both the tcdA- and tcdB-specific insertion of the targetron. The targetron element inserted after nucleotide 4068 of the sense strand for tcdA, nucleotide 1587 of the sense strand for tcdB, and nucleotide 421 of the sense strand for cdtA. The tcdAB double toxin mutant was constructed using tcdB mutant 1 as the parent strain. To verify that the targetron insertions had occurred as anticipated, PCR using the following oligonucleotide primers were used: for tcdA, EBS-universal (sigma) and JRP3602 (TAAATGTACTACCTACAATAACAGAGGG); for tcdB, EBS-universal and JRP1592 (GTGGCCCTGAAGCATATG); and for cdtA, EBS-universal and JRP1744 (GGGAAAGAAAAGAAGCAGAAAG). Strain numbers were assigned as follows: for tcdA mutant 1, DLL3043; for tcdA mutant 2, DLL3045; for tcdB mutant 1, DLL3101; for tcdB mutant 2, DLL3102; and for the tcdAB mutant, DLL3121.

Each mutant was also confirmed by Southern hybridization analysis as described previously, using an ermB-specific PCR product (47), a tcdB- or tcdA-specific PCR product (9), or a cdt-specific PCR product amplified using primers JRP1746 (GGAAGACGAAGATTTGGATACA) and JRP2505 (GGTTTTAGCTCAGACATAGGGA).

To confirm the correct toxin production profiles in each mutant and wild-type strain, TcdA-, TcdB-, and CdtA-specific Western blot analyses were performed as described previously (9, 13), except that toxins were precipitated from culture supernatants using chloroform-methanol (8), and Vero and HT29 cell cytotoxicity and neutralization assays were also performed as described previously (9).

Complementation of the tcdA and tcdB genes was attempted; however, despite multiple attempts, it did not prove possible to clone the intact tcdA or tcdB gene into an appropriate shuttle plasmid that would facilitate conjugative transfer into C. difficile.

Animal infection trials.

Virulence trials using the Monash and Sanger mouse models and the Hines hamster model were performed as described previously (2) and are described in detail in the supplemental material. For the Monash mouse model, all monitoring was carried out in accordance with Victorian State Government regulations and the Monash University Animal Ethics guidelines. All experiments were approved by the Monash University SOBS B Animal Ethics Committee. All Sanger mouse model experiments were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986. All hamster experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Hines VA Hospital.

Histopathological scoring and staining.

All histopathological analysis was performed by an independent, certified pathologist at the Australian Phenomics Network, University of Melbourne. Monash and Sanger colonic and cecal sections were assessed using a scoring system based on previously established parameters (26), described in detail in Table S3 in the supplemental material. Terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed on thymus sections using an in situ cell death detection kit with fluorescein (Roche), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Microarrays.

Total RNA was extracted from colonic tissues isolated from mice at Monash University and the terminal cecal tissues of mice from the Sanger Institute, using the Qiagen RNeasy kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality was assessed using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies), and microarray gene expression analyses performed on an Illumina GEX platform. Microarray data were analyzed using GeneSpring software (Agilent Technologies). Genes showing differential expression were selected with a Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected P value of <0.05 and fold change (compared to mock-infected controls) of >2 for Monash tissues or >1.5 for Sanger tissues. The transcriptomic responses of samples were arranged as a heat map (Fig. 4) by applying a Pearson hierarchical-clustering algorithm based on both entities and conditions. Analyses of enriched Gene Ontology terms and KEGG pathways associated with differentially expressed gene sets were subsequently performed using the DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualisation and Integrated Discovery) (27) functional classification tool and the InnateDB database (28) for innate immune response.

Note that additional methods are provided in the supplemental material.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Text S1 

Supplemental results and methods. Download

Figure S1 

Analysis of toxin gene mutants by Southern blotting. The wild type and isogenic mutant strains were examined by Southern blotting using HpaI-/SpeI-digested chromosomal DNA and a tcdA-specific probe (A), XbaI-digested chromosomal DNA and a tcdB-specific probe (B), HpaI-/EcoRI-digested DNA and a cdt-specific probe (C), or XbaI-digested chromosomal DNA and an ermB-specific probe that is specific for insertion of the targetron (D). Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, pathogenicity locus (PaLoc)-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2, independent cdtA mutants. HindIII-digested lambda DNA was used for molecular size markers (sizes in base pairs are indicated). Download

Figure S2 

Comparative analysis of toxin production. The wild-type and isogenic mutant strains were examined by Western immunoblotting using precipitated supernatant proteins from the strains indicated and TcdA-specific antibodies (A), TcdB-specific antibodies (B), or iota A-specific antibodies, which cross-react with CDTa (C). Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, PaLoc-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2 independent cdtA mutants. The molecular weight size markers are shown in kDa. Download

Figure S3 

Vero cell cytotoxicity and neutralization assays. Serial doubling dilutions of C. difficile culture supernatants were made and used in cytotoxicity assays. (A) The morphological changes of Vero cells were observed and scored by microscopy after 24 h. The endpoint was recorded as the last dilution when 100% cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed. The toxin titer is the reciprocal of the endpoint dilution. Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, PaLoc-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2, independent cdtA mutants. The mean values from triplicate assays are shown together with the standard errors of the means (SEM). (B) Neutralization of cytotoxicity. C. difficile culture supernatants were added to Vero cells and morphological changes observed after 24 h; supernatants were untreated (no antibody) or pretreated for 90 min with neutralizing antibodies to TcdB (anti-TcdB), TcdA (anti-TcdA), or iota A (anti-Ia) prior to addition to the Vero cells. Representative images are shown. Scale bar indicates 100 µm. Download

Figure S4 

HT29 cell cytotoxicity and neutralization assays. Serial doubling dilutions of C. difficile culture supernatants were made and used in cytotoxicity assays. (A) The morphological changes of HT29 cells were observed and scored by microscopy after 24 h. The endpoint was taken as the last dilution when 100% CPE was observed. The toxin titer is the reciprocal of the endpoint dilution. Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, PaLoc-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2 independent cdtA mutants. The mean values of triplicate assays are shown together with the SEM. (B) Neutralization of toxicity. C. difficile culture supernatants were added to HT29 cells and morphological changes observed after 24 h; supernatants were untreated (no antibody) or pretreated for 90 min with neutralizing antibodies to TcdB (anti-TcdB), TcdA (anti-TcdA), or iota A (anti-Ia) prior to addition to the HT29 cells. Representative images are shown. Scale bar indicates 100 µm. Download

Figure S5 

Infection with a higher infectious dose of a TcdA+ TcdB strain does not result in more severe disease or multiorgan damage. (A, B) Weight loss (A) and survival (B) of Monash mice infected with 1 × 106 spores of the wild-type strain (TcdA+ TcdB+) (n = 6) (green line) or 5 × 108 spores of tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+ TcdB) (n = 12) (blue line) or mock infected with PBS (n = 6) (grey line). (C) Representative images of organ tissues collected from Monash CDI mice infected with 1 × 106 spores of wild-type strain M7404 (WT) or 5 × 108 spores of tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B) or mock infected with PBS (Mock). (D, E) Histopathological scoring of damage to cecal tissues (D) and colonic tissues (E) from Monash mice infected with 1 × 106 spores of the wild-type strain (WT) (n = 6) or 5 × 108 spores of tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B) (n = 12) or mock infected with PBS (Mock) (n = 6). All values are the geometric means ± SEM. Download

Figure S6 

The TcdA+ TcdB and TcdA TcdB+ toxin mutants are equally fit in vivo and do not have a colonization defect in comparison to the wild-type strain. (A) Colonization efficiencies of the wild-type strain (TcdA+ TcdB+) (black bars) and the TcdA+ TcdB (blue bars) and TcdA TcdB+ (pink bars) isogenic toxin mutants at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h following infection of mice using the Monash model of CDI, shown as the number of C. difficile cells (CFU/ml) within the feces of infected mice at each time point. All values are the geometric means ± SEM. Note that C. difficile numbers were also enumerated from feces collected from mock-infected mice; viable counts were zero, as anticipated, and so cannot be seen on the graph. (B) In vivo TcdA toxin assays performed on HT29 cells using luminal contents collected from the gastrointestinal tracts of mice (n = 3) infected with the wild-type strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (black bar), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (blue bar), tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (pink bar), or the tcdAB double toxin gene mutant (TcdAB−) (grey bar) or mock infected (white bar). The mean values are shown together with the SEM. (C) In vivo TcdB toxin assays performed on Vero cells using luminal contents collected from the gastrointestinal tracts of mice (n = 3) infected with the wild-type strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (black bar), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (blue bar), tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (pink bar), or the tcdAB double toxin gene mutant (TcdAB) (grey bar) or mock infected (white bar). The mean values are shown together with the SEM. (D) Colonization efficiencies of the wild-type strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (black circles), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (blue squares), and tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (pink triangles) isogenic toxin mutants using the hamster model of CDI, shown as the time from infection to the isolation of C. difficile colonies from feces of infected animals using CCFA growth medium (9). (E) Competitive index (CI) values for the TcdA+ TcdB toxin gene mutant versus the TcdA TcdB+ toxin gene mutant at 24 and 48 h following infection using the Monash model of CDI. Individual CI values are represented by closed black circles, with the horizontal lines representing the geometric means. Download

Table S1 

Comparison of the sporulation frequencies of the wild-type strain and isogenic toxin gene mutants.

Table S2 

List of genes differentially upregulated and downregulated by infection with C. difficile wild type and toxin mutants, using the Monash and Sanger infection model.

Table S3 

Parameters used for histopathological scoring of colon and cecum tissues.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research at Monash University was supported by Project grants 545858 and APP1051584 (Australian National Health and Medical Research Council) and Discovery grant DP1093891 (Australian Research Council). D.L. was supported by Future fellowship FT120100779 (Australian Research Council). Research at the Sanger Institute was funded by the Wellcome Trust (grants 098051 and 086418) and the Medical Research Council New Investigator Research grant (grant 93614 to T.D.L.). S.J. and D.N.G. are funded by the VA Merit Review program.

We thank Tina Cardamone (Australian Phenomics Network, University of Melbourne) and John Finney and Rolfe Howlett (R & A Veterinary Pathology Services, NSW) for pathology services. We are also grateful to Mark Arends (University of Cambridge) for assisting with the histological scoring of mouse tissues from the Sanger Institute.

Footnotes

Citation Carter GP, Chakravorty A, Pham Nguyen TA, Mileto S, Schreiber F, Li L, Howarth P, Clare S, Cunningham B, Sambol SP, Cheknis A, Figueroa I, Johnson S, Gerding D, Rood JI, Dougan G, Lawley TD, Lyras D. 2015. Defining the roles of TcdA and TcdB in localized gastrointestinal disease, systemic organ damage, and the host response during Clostridium difficile infections. mBio 6(3):e00551-15. doi:10.1128/mBio.00551-15.

Contributor Information

Jimmy D. Ballard, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.

R. John Collier, Harvard Medical School.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Freeman J, Bauer MP, Baines SD, Corver J, Fawley WN, Goorhuis B, Kuijper EJ, Wilcox MH. 2010. The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:529–549. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00082-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Squire MM, Carter GP, Mackin KE, Chakravorty A, Norén T, Elliott B, Lyras D, Riley TV. 2013. Novel molecular type of Clostridium difficile in neonatal pigs, Western Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 19:790–792. doi: 10.3201/eid1905.121062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Knight DR, Riley TV. 2013. Prevalence of gastrointestinal Clostridium difficile carriage in Australian sheep and lambs. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5689–5692. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01888-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aktories K. 2011. Bacterial protein toxins that modify host regulatory GTPases. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:487–498. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Drudy D, Fanning S, Kyne L. 2007. Toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile. Int J Infect Dis 11:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gerding DN, Johnson S, Rupnik M, Aktories K. 2014. Clostridium difficile binary toxin CDT: mechanism, epidemiology, and potential clinical importance. Gut Microbes 5:15–27. doi: 10.4161/gmic.26854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lyerly DM, Phelps CJ, Toth J, Wilkins TD. 1986. Characterization of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile with monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 54:70–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP. 2010. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature 467:711–713. doi: 10.1038/nature09397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lyras D, O’Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, Phumoonna T, Poon R, Adams V, Vedantam G, Johnson S, Gerding DN, Rood JI. 2009. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature 458:1176–1179. doi: 10.1038/nature07822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kuehne SA, Collery MM, Kelly ML, Cartman ST, Cockayne A, Minton NP. 2014. Importance of toxin A, toxin B, and CDT in virulence of an epidemic Clostridium difficile strain. J Infect Dis 209:83–86. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gill N, Finlay BB. 2011. The gut microbiota: challenging immunology. Nat Rev Immunol 11:636–637. doi: 10.1038/nri3061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ballard JD. 2010. Medical microbiology: a toxin contest. Nature 467:665–666. doi: 10.1038/467665a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carter GP, Lyras D, Allen DL, Mackin KE, Howarth PM, O’Connor JR, Rood JI. 2007. Binary toxin production in Clostridium difficile is regulated by CdtR, a LytTR family response regulator. J Bacteriol 189:7290–7301. doi: 10.1128/JB.00731-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen X, Katchar K, Goldsmith JD, Nanthakumar N, Cheknis A, Gerding DN, Kelly CP. 2008. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 135:1984–1992. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okayasu I, Hatakeyama S, Yamada M, Ohkusa T, Inagaki Y, Nakaya R. 1990. A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 98:694–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lawley TD, Clare S, Walker AW, Goulding D, Stabler RA, Croucher N, Mastroeni P, Scott P, Raisen C, Mottram L, Fairweather NF, Wren BW, Parkhill J, Dougan G. 2009. Antibiotic treatment of Clostridium difficile carrier mice triggers a supershedder state, spore-mediated transmission, and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. Infect Immun 77:3661–3669. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00558-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dobson G, Hickey C, Trinder J. 2003. Clostridium difficile colitis causing toxic megacolon, severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med 29:1030. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1754-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Steele J, Chen K, Sun X, Zhang Y, Wang H, Tzipori S, Feng H. 2012. Systemic dissemination of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B is associated with severe, fatal disease in animal models. J Infect Dis 205:384–391. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guengerich FP. 2008. Cytochrome P450 and chemical toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol 21:70–83. doi: 10.1021/tx700079z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rowland A, Miners JO, Mackenzie PI. 2013. The UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: their role in drug metabolism and detoxification. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45:1121–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhuang XM, Wei X, Tan Y, Xiao WB, Yang HY, Xie JW, Lu C, Li H. 2014. Contribution of carboxylesterase and cytochrome P450 to the bioactivation and detoxification of isocarbophos and its enantiomers in human liver microsomes. Toxicol Sci 140:40–48. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hediger MA, Romero MF, Peng JB, Rolfs A, Takanaga H, Bruford EA. 2004. The ABCs of solute carriers: physiological, pathological and therapeutic implications of human membrane transport proteins. Pflugers Arch 447:465–468. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1192-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O’Connor JR, Lyras D, Farrow KA, Adams V, Powell DR, Hinds J, Cheung JK, Rood JI. 2006. Construction and analysis of chromosomal Clostridium difficile mutants. Mol Microbiol 61:1335–1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li S, Shi L, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Perez-Cordon G, Huang T, Ramsey J, Oezguen N, Savidge TC, Feng H. 2015. Critical roles of Clostridium difficile toxin B enzymatic activities in pathogenesis. Infect Immun 83:502–513. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02316-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwan C, Stecher B, Tzivelekidis T, van Ham M, Rohde M, Hardt WD, Wehland J, Aktories K. 2009. Clostridium difficile toxin CDT induces formation of microtubule-based protrusions and increases adherence of bacteria. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000626. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Geric B, Carman RJ, Rupnik M, Genheimer CW, Sambol SP, Lyerly DM, Gerding DN, Johnson S. 2006. Binary toxin-producing, large clostridial toxin-negative Clostridium difficile strains are enterotoxic but do not cause disease in hamsters. J Infect Dis 193:1143–1150. doi: 10.1086/501368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Savidge TC, Pan WH, Newman P, O’Brien M, Anton PM, Pothoulakis C. 2003. Clostridium difficile toxin B is an inflammatory enterotoxin in human intestine. Gastroenterology 125:413–420. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00902-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Steele J, Mukherjee J, Parry N, Tzipori S. 2013. Antibody against TcdB, but not TcdA, prevents development of gastrointestinal and systemic Clostridium difficile disease. J Infect Dis 207:323–330. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hamm EE, Voth DE, Ballard JD. 2006. Identification of Clostridium difficile toxin B cardiotoxicity using a zebrafish embryo model of intoxication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:14176–14181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604725103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brenchley JM, Price DA, Schacker TW, Asher TE, Silvestri G, Rao S, Kazzaz Z, Bornstein E, Lambotte O, Altmann D, Blazar BR, Rodriguez B, Teixeira-Johnson L, Landay A, Martin JN, Hecht FM, Picker LJ, Lederman MM, Deeks SG, Douek DC. 2006. Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection. Nat Med 12:1365–1371. doi: 10.1038/nm1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calder AE, Hince MN, Dudakov JA, Chidgey AP, Boyd RL. 2011. Thymic involution: where endocrinology meets immunology. Neuroimmunomodulation 18:281–289. doi: 10.1159/000329496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Poduval RD, Kamath RP, Corpuz M, Norkus EP, Pitchumoni CS. 2000. Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: the new nosocomial alliance. Am J Gastroenterol 95:3513–3515. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fujitani S, George WL, Morgan MA, Nichols S, Murthy AR. 2011. Implications for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization associated with Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Infect Control 39:188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vardakas KZ, Konstantelias AA, Loizidis G, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME. 2012. Risk factors for development of Clostridium difficile infection due to BI/NAP1/027 strain: a meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 16:e768–e773. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.D’Auria KM, Kolling GL, Donato GM, Warren CA, Gray MC, Hewlett EL, Papin JA. 2013. In vivo physiological and transcriptional profiling reveals host responses to Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B. Infect Immun 81:3814–3824. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00869-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hirota SA, Iablokov V, Tulk SE, Schenck LP, Becker H, Nguyen J, Al Bashir S, Dingle TC, Laing A, Liu J, Li Y, Bolstad J, Mulvey GL, Armstrong GD, MacNaughton WK, Muruve DA, MacDonald JA, Beck PL. 2012. Intrarectal instillation of Clostridium difficile toxin A triggers colonic inflammation and tissue damage: development of a novel and efficient mouse model of Clostridium difficile toxin exposure. Infect Immun 80:4474–4484. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00933-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Farrow MA, Chumbler NM, Lapierre LA, Franklin JL, Rutherford SA, Goldenring JR, Lacy DB. 2013. Clostridium difficile toxin B-induced necrosis is mediated by the host epithelial cell NADPH oxidase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18674–18679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313658110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grasberger H, El-Zaatari M, Dang DT, Merchant JL. 2013. Dual oxidases control release of hydrogen peroxide by the gastric epithelium to prevent Helicobacter felis infection and inflammation in mice. Gastroenterology 145:1045–1054. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Otamiri T, Sjödahl R. 1991. Oxygen radicals: their role in selected gastrointestinal disorders. Dig Dis 9:133–141. doi: 10.1159/000171299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sasaki M, Joh T. 2007. Oxidative stress and ischemia-reperfusion injury in gastrointestinal tract and antioxidant, protective agents. J Clin Biochem Nutr 40:1–12. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.40.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim YJ, Kim EH, Hahm KB. 2012. Oxidative stress in inflammation-based gastrointestinal tract diseases: challenges and opportunities. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:1004–1010. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Diebold BA, Smith SM, Li Y, Lambeth JD. 24 March 2014. NOX2 as a target for drug development: indications, possible complications, and progress. Antioxid Redox Signal, in press. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.5862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Harrison IP, Selemidis S. 2014. Understanding the biology of reactive oxygen species and their link to cancer: Nox oxidases as novel pharmacological targets. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 41:533–542. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lim SK, Stuart RL, Mackin KE, Carter GP, Kotsanas D, Francis MJ, Easton M, Dimovski K, Elliott B, Riley TV, Hogg G, Paul E, Korman TM, Seemann T, Stinear TP, Lyras D, Jenkin GA. 2014. Emergence of a ribotype 244 strain of Clostridium difficile associated with severe disease and related to the epidemic ribotype 027 strain. Clin Infect Dis 58:1723–1730. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eyre DW, Cule ML, Wilson DJ, Griffiths D, Vaughan A, O’Connor L, Ip CL, Golubchik T, Batty EM, Finney JM, Wyllie DH, Didelot X, Piazza P, Bowden R, Dingle KE, Harding RM, Crook DW, Wilcox MH, Peto TE, Walker AS. 2013. Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med 369:1195–1205. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1216064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hensgens MP, Keessen EC, Squire MM, Riley TV, Koene MG, de Boer E, Lipman LJ, Kuijper EJ, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Clostridium difficile (ESGCD) . 2012. Clostridium difficile infection in the community: a zoonotic disease? Clin Microbiol Infect 18:635–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Carter GP, Awad MM, Hao Y, Thelen T, Bergin IL, Howarth PM, Seemann T, Rood JI, Aronoff DM, Lyras D. 2011. TcsL is an essential virulence factor in Clostridium sordellii ATCC 9714. Infect Immun 79:1025–1032. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00968-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Text S1 

Supplemental results and methods. Download

Figure S1 

Analysis of toxin gene mutants by Southern blotting. The wild type and isogenic mutant strains were examined by Southern blotting using HpaI-/SpeI-digested chromosomal DNA and a tcdA-specific probe (A), XbaI-digested chromosomal DNA and a tcdB-specific probe (B), HpaI-/EcoRI-digested DNA and a cdt-specific probe (C), or XbaI-digested chromosomal DNA and an ermB-specific probe that is specific for insertion of the targetron (D). Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, pathogenicity locus (PaLoc)-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2, independent cdtA mutants. HindIII-digested lambda DNA was used for molecular size markers (sizes in base pairs are indicated). Download

Figure S2 

Comparative analysis of toxin production. The wild-type and isogenic mutant strains were examined by Western immunoblotting using precipitated supernatant proteins from the strains indicated and TcdA-specific antibodies (A), TcdB-specific antibodies (B), or iota A-specific antibodies, which cross-react with CDTa (C). Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, PaLoc-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2 independent cdtA mutants. The molecular weight size markers are shown in kDa. Download

Figure S3 

Vero cell cytotoxicity and neutralization assays. Serial doubling dilutions of C. difficile culture supernatants were made and used in cytotoxicity assays. (A) The morphological changes of Vero cells were observed and scored by microscopy after 24 h. The endpoint was recorded as the last dilution when 100% cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed. The toxin titer is the reciprocal of the endpoint dilution. Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, PaLoc-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2, independent cdtA mutants. The mean values from triplicate assays are shown together with the standard errors of the means (SEM). (B) Neutralization of cytotoxicity. C. difficile culture supernatants were added to Vero cells and morphological changes observed after 24 h; supernatants were untreated (no antibody) or pretreated for 90 min with neutralizing antibodies to TcdB (anti-TcdB), TcdA (anti-TcdA), or iota A (anti-Ia) prior to addition to the Vero cells. Representative images are shown. Scale bar indicates 100 µm. Download

Figure S4 

HT29 cell cytotoxicity and neutralization assays. Serial doubling dilutions of C. difficile culture supernatants were made and used in cytotoxicity assays. (A) The morphological changes of HT29 cells were observed and scored by microscopy after 24 h. The endpoint was taken as the last dilution when 100% CPE was observed. The toxin titer is the reciprocal of the endpoint dilution. Legend: TcdA+ TcdB+ (WT), strain M7404; avirulent, PaLoc-negative control strain CD37; TcdA TcdB+1/2, independent tcdA mutants; TcdA+ TcdB1/2, independent tcdB mutants; TcdA TcdB, tcdA tcdB double mutant; CDT1/2 independent cdtA mutants. The mean values of triplicate assays are shown together with the SEM. (B) Neutralization of toxicity. C. difficile culture supernatants were added to HT29 cells and morphological changes observed after 24 h; supernatants were untreated (no antibody) or pretreated for 90 min with neutralizing antibodies to TcdB (anti-TcdB), TcdA (anti-TcdA), or iota A (anti-Ia) prior to addition to the HT29 cells. Representative images are shown. Scale bar indicates 100 µm. Download

Figure S5 

Infection with a higher infectious dose of a TcdA+ TcdB strain does not result in more severe disease or multiorgan damage. (A, B) Weight loss (A) and survival (B) of Monash mice infected with 1 × 106 spores of the wild-type strain (TcdA+ TcdB+) (n = 6) (green line) or 5 × 108 spores of tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+ TcdB) (n = 12) (blue line) or mock infected with PBS (n = 6) (grey line). (C) Representative images of organ tissues collected from Monash CDI mice infected with 1 × 106 spores of wild-type strain M7404 (WT) or 5 × 108 spores of tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B) or mock infected with PBS (Mock). (D, E) Histopathological scoring of damage to cecal tissues (D) and colonic tissues (E) from Monash mice infected with 1 × 106 spores of the wild-type strain (WT) (n = 6) or 5 × 108 spores of tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B) (n = 12) or mock infected with PBS (Mock) (n = 6). All values are the geometric means ± SEM. Download

Figure S6 

The TcdA+ TcdB and TcdA TcdB+ toxin mutants are equally fit in vivo and do not have a colonization defect in comparison to the wild-type strain. (A) Colonization efficiencies of the wild-type strain (TcdA+ TcdB+) (black bars) and the TcdA+ TcdB (blue bars) and TcdA TcdB+ (pink bars) isogenic toxin mutants at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h following infection of mice using the Monash model of CDI, shown as the number of C. difficile cells (CFU/ml) within the feces of infected mice at each time point. All values are the geometric means ± SEM. Note that C. difficile numbers were also enumerated from feces collected from mock-infected mice; viable counts were zero, as anticipated, and so cannot be seen on the graph. (B) In vivo TcdA toxin assays performed on HT29 cells using luminal contents collected from the gastrointestinal tracts of mice (n = 3) infected with the wild-type strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (black bar), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (blue bar), tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (pink bar), or the tcdAB double toxin gene mutant (TcdAB−) (grey bar) or mock infected (white bar). The mean values are shown together with the SEM. (C) In vivo TcdB toxin assays performed on Vero cells using luminal contents collected from the gastrointestinal tracts of mice (n = 3) infected with the wild-type strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (black bar), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (blue bar), tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (pink bar), or the tcdAB double toxin gene mutant (TcdAB) (grey bar) or mock infected (white bar). The mean values are shown together with the SEM. (D) Colonization efficiencies of the wild-type strain [TcdA+B+ (WT)] (black circles), tcdB mutant 1 (TcdA+B1) (blue squares), and tcdA mutant 1 (TcdAB+1) (pink triangles) isogenic toxin mutants using the hamster model of CDI, shown as the time from infection to the isolation of C. difficile colonies from feces of infected animals using CCFA growth medium (9). (E) Competitive index (CI) values for the TcdA+ TcdB toxin gene mutant versus the TcdA TcdB+ toxin gene mutant at 24 and 48 h following infection using the Monash model of CDI. Individual CI values are represented by closed black circles, with the horizontal lines representing the geometric means. Download

Table S1 

Comparison of the sporulation frequencies of the wild-type strain and isogenic toxin gene mutants.

Table S2 

List of genes differentially upregulated and downregulated by infection with C. difficile wild type and toxin mutants, using the Monash and Sanger infection model.

Table S3 

Parameters used for histopathological scoring of colon and cecum tissues.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES