Skip to main content
Malaysian Family Physician : the Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia logoLink to Malaysian Family Physician : the Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia
. 2006 Aug 31;1(2-3):94–96.

Chronic Disease Management In Singapore Polyclinics

Verna Lee Kar Mun 1,, Tan Ngiap Chuan 2, Chow Mun Hong 2
PMCID: PMC4453124  PMID: 27570599

INTRODUCTION

Singapore is a small country with a total population of 4.4 million (2005). It has a relatively young population with 8.3% of the population above 65 years of age.1 However, in 2006 there are about 1 million Singaporeans who are affected by four common chronic diseases, i.e. diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and stroke.2 These non-communicable diseases, together with cancers, account for more than 60% of all deaths and a high burden of disability and healthcare expenditures. The burden of these diseases is likely to rise with the rapidly ageing population and changing lifestyles, and will present profound challenges to healthcare delivery and financing systems over the next 20 years.

RESTRUCTURING OF GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

The public health care delivery system in Singapore also faces the challenges of rising expectations with demand for better health services and shortage of human resources. It was also fragmented, resulting in duplication and lack of coordination between institutions. There is general consensus among various medical experts that for these chronic diseases, patients achieve better health outcomes if they: (a) take co-responsibility of their health (self-management); and (b) receive structured evidence-based treatment by good family physicians working in partnership with hospital specialists (structured disease management programme).2

Restructuring of the public healthcare institutions took place in year 2000 to forge vertical and horizontal integration between hospitals and primary healthcare facilities. It consists of two integrated networks, the western cluster (National Healthcare Group) and the eastern cluster (Singapore Health Services), each comprising a network of primary health care polyclinics, regional hospitals and tertiary institutions. This is also to prevent healthcare monopoly and to encourage healthy corporate competition between the two clusters.

Primary health care in Singapore is similar to Malaysia: the government polyclinics are publicly funded restructured primary care institutions and the other major stakeholder is the private general practitioner. The Primary Care Survey 2005 done by the Ministry of Health3 has reported lower patient loads (number of patients seen divided by total number of doctors employed) in the polyclinics as 22% compared to the private clinics (78%), and the percentage of patients with chronic diseases followed up in the polyclinics were 43%.

CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN POLYCLINICS

Multi-disciplinary team

The framework in the development of the disease management programme included identifying the diseases and defining the target population, organising a multi-disciplinary team led by a clinician champion, defining the core components, treatment protocols and evaluation methods, defining the goals, and measuring and managing the outcomes.4 Primary healthcare centres, or polyclinics, are run by teams of family physicians, medical officers, nurses, case managers, health educators, dieticians, pharmacists, clinical administrators and medical social workers. The establishment of the clusters has provided a setting in which structured disease management could be readily implemented.

All the current 18 government polyclinics have structured disease management programmes that are team-based and led by family physicians (known as clinician champions). The functional integration of these healthcare elements within each cluster under a common administrative and professional management, and the development of common clinical information systems greatly facilitate implementation of the disease management programmes. Multi-disciplinary decision support protocols have been developed in conjunction with hospital specialists to provide consistent integrated pathway and to facilitate the referral systems.5 Case managers have been recruited and trained in developing clinical pathways and performing discharge planning for inpatients and utilisation review for outpatient care in the hospitals. Clinical case managers in primary care, recently introduced into polyclinics, work closely with patients on the lifestyle and medication changes required to achieve target, is a prominent feature of most successful chronic disease programs. The case manager is usually a nurse or nurse practitioner with additional training or experience in a particular chronic disease care and in techniques to help patients become more capable self-managers of their illness. The nurses personally “manage” patients by protocol, adding clinical and self-management skills as well as greater intensity of care.

Chronic disease management

There are currently two established disease management programmes in the polyclinics, i.e. Enhanced Primary Care Asthma Clinic6 and Family Physician Clinic (also known as Diabetes, Hypertension and Lipid or DHL Clinic).7 In the polyclinics, infrastructures built for the chronic disease management programmes would include well-equipped consultation rooms for individual (one-toone) health counselling/education, smoking cessation counselling, fundus camera for diabetic retinal photography, diet counselling, feet check; each man by a trained nurse. Spacious air-conditioned waiting areas with educational video presentations and printed materials readily available for patients to consume. Not all patients with chronic diseases are seen in these clinics. Patients are stratified and those with sub optimal control who fulfil criteria in their decision support tool are given appointment to follow-up in these chronic care clinics, for example asthmatic patients on regular high dose steroid inhalers or recently admitted for acute exacerbation, diabetic patients with HbA1c of 8% or more, and complicated patients with two or more chronic conditions. Once their conditions are stabilised, patients have an option to be referred back to their previous primary care doctors.

Clinical information system

The health care team in these programmes is continuously trained and supported with practical decision protocols, which are constantly updated by the team. Feedback and comments from the team members are always taken into consideration. The team conducts monthly plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles looking at clinical outcome (disease control) indicators, such as reductions in HbA1c, blood pressure, microalbuminuria, as well as improvement in care processes, such as performance of retinal or feet examinations in diabetics and peak expiratory flow rate in asthmatics. This is possible because all patients with chronic disease have their socio-demographic data documented in the highly secured web-based information system that is linked to the clinical information system and accessible to all polyclinics and hospitals from the same cluster. The all-in-one information system registers the patient flow from appointment system to consultation rooms (the queue management system and scheduled examinations), laboratory (reminder system and clinical laboratory indicators), radiology, pharmacy and consolidated payment at the end of each clinic visit.

Self management tool

Patients with one or more chronic diseases are encouraged to purchase a self-management booklet (S$5 each). A trained nurse clinician demonstrates the usefulness of the booklet via video presentation and counselling, and teaches the patient individually how to use it at home for self-monitoring and management. All asthmatic patients are taught to use the practical and patient-friendly asthma action plans and diaries.

Clinical vs organisational management skills

There is another new paradigm shift in the polyclinic management in conjunction with chronic disease management. In the past family physicians were primarily focusing on polishing clinical skills and updating clinical management. From what a family physician can do for his circle of patients, they are now trained to bring better care to masses of people through improved management skills. Directors of polyclinics who are usually senior consultant family physicians are now regularly attending management and leadership courses.

SUPPORT FROM MINISTRY OF HEALTH

The Ministry of Health Singapore establishes National Disease Registries in coronary heart disease, cancer, stroke, myopia and kidney failure, which become valuable sources of clinical and outcomes data.2 In partnership with expert groups, national committees and professional agencies, the Ministry produces clinical practice guidelines that assist doctors and healthcare professionals to better manage important aspects of the key diseases.4 Most importantly, the Ministry has committed funds to support selected National Disease Management programmes and allows qualified patients to utilise their national health insurance scheme, Medisave to help pay for these disease management programmes, up to a maximum S$300 annually.8

The Ministry monitors and publishes regularly the performance, cost and effectiveness of these disease management programmes so that patients can make informed choices when selecting their health providers. This steers patients and doctors towards the strategy of preventive maintenance to stop or slow down the deterioration of chronic medical conditions. All registered government family physicians and private general practitioners that have interest in chronic care are encouraged to participate in these disease management programmes. The list of doctors’ names and their effectiveness are published in the ministry’s website. Patients with any of these chronic diseases are advised to register with these doctors, who will presumably be their Family Physicians. The cost and health outcomes of these patients are monitored and important data is published at the website for both patients and doctors to learn from one another.

CHALLENGES

The Singapore Polyclinics Chronic Disease Management Model demonstrates a programme that is fully computerized and transparent. It prioritizes patients’ problems, trains multidisciplinary team players, practices individual nurse counselling with motivational interviewing method, utilizes easy-to-follow modified decision support protocols based on the clinical practice guidelines, and constantly checking on quality improvements. Nevertheless, they need a huge numbers of human resource especially trained nurses; generally each government polyclinic has about 20 primary care trained staff nurses and almost half of them are involved in chronic care. Another challenge is cost. They are evolving from a previous single charge “buffet” where patients do not have a sense of the value of what they are consuming. Many services are chargeable but subsidised by government; patients with chronic diseases are now paying for each of the clinical services in the polyclinics, S$8 each for doctor consultation, an annual feet check and annual eye screen. Nurse counselling is now chargeable at minimal cost as nurse clinician (case manager) is introduced into the clinics. Many medications for chronic diseases are non-standard items and are not subsidised. Another major challenge in Singapore is to engage the capacity of private primary care sector into improving chronic care.

In conclusion, Singapore health care has taken a major leap and invested a large amount of money and work force in chronic disease management. These changes attempt to integrate population perspectives and person-centred perspectives. Primary health care team can play a lead role in chronic illness care, but health care organisation system support and policy are critical to its success.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Verna Lee wishes to thank Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia for supporting her sabbatical leave in Singapore from June to October 2006.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ministry of Health Singapore. Population and vital statistics. Health Facts Singapore 2005. MOH.
  • 2.Tan CC. National disease management plans for key chronic noncommunicable diseases in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002;31((4)):415–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ministry of Health Singapore. Primary Care Survey 2005. MOH.
  • 4.Cheah J. Chronic disease management: a Singapore perspective. BMJ. 2001;323:990–3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheah J, Heng BH. Implementing chronic disease management in the public healthcare sector in Singapore: the role of hospitals. World Hosp Health Serv. 2001;37((3)):19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abisheganaden J. Asthma disease management: a provider’s perspective. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002;31((4)):467–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lim FS, Toh MP, Emmanuel SC, Chan SP, Lim G. A preliminary evaluation of a disease management programme for patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension in a primary healthcare setting. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002;31((4)):431–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ministry of Health Singapore. Medisave for Chronic Disease Management Programme.

Articles from Malaysian Family Physician : the Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia are provided here courtesy of Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia

RESOURCES