Abstract
Introduction
Diffuse axonal injury is an extremely common type of traumatic brain injury encountered in motor vehicle crashes, sports injuries, and in combat. Although many cases of diffuse axonal injury result in chronic disability, there are no current treatments for this condition. Its basic lesion, traumatic axonal injury, has been aggressively modeled in primate and rodent animal models. The inexorable axonal and perikaryal degeneration and dysmyelination often encountered in traumatic axonal injury calls for regenerative therapies, including therapies based on stem cells and precursors. Here we explore the proof of concept that treatments based on transplants of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells can replace or remodel myelin and, eventually, contribute to axonal regeneration in traumatic axonal injury.
Methods
We derived human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells from the human embryonic stem cell line H9, purified and characterized them. We then transplanted these human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells into the deep sensorimotor cortex next to the corpus callosum of nude rats subjected to traumatic axonal injury based on the impact acceleration model of Marmarou. We explored the time course and spatial distribution of differentiation and structural integration of these cells in rat forebrain.
Results
At the time of transplantation, over 90 % of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells expressed A2B5, PDGFR, NG2, O4, Olig2 and Sox10, a profile consistent with their progenitor or early oligodendrocyte status. After transplantation, these cells survived well and migrated massively via the corpus callosum in both injured and uninjured brains. Human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells displayed a striking preference for white matter tracts and were contained almost exclusively in the corpus callosum and external capsule, the striatopallidal striae, and cortical layer 6. Over 3 months, human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells progressively matured into myelin basic protein(+) and adenomatous polyposis coli protein(+) oligodendrocytes. The injured environment in the corpus callosum of impact acceleration subjects tended to favor maturation of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Electron microscopy revealed that mature transplant-derived oligodendrocytes ensheathed host axons with spiral wraps intimately associated with myelin sheaths.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that, instead of differentiating locally, human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells migrate massively along white matter tracts and differentiate extensively into ensheathing oligodendrocytes. These features make them appealing candidates for cellular therapies of diffuse axonal injury aiming at myelin remodeling and axonal protection or regeneration.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0087-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Introduction
Axonal injury is the defining feature of diffuse axonal injury (DAI), but is also present in blast injuries [1], chronic traumatic encephalopathy [2], and even mild head injuries [3]. Axonal damage in models of DAI is referred to as traumatic axonal injury (TAI), a term often used interchangeably with DAI [4, 5]. In the case of DAI, axonal injury causes disconnection of neural circuits at multiple central nervous system (CNS) sites [6–8] and can lead to a number of neurological impairments, including long-term memory problems, emotional disturbances, unconsciousness, and/or a persistent vegetative state. These neurological impairments have no satisfactory treatment besides symptomatic alleviation of various subsyndromes with physical, occupational, speech and language therapy and various categories of CNS-acting drugs including antispasmodics, antidepressants, and mood stabilizers. Although some retraining of circuits is anticipated over time and syndromic pharmacotherapies have some effectiveness, most patients with DAI still remain severely symptomatic years and decades later.
Stem cell therapy presents a promising treatment approach for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Some early success in models of ischemic brain injury [9] has encouraged the use of stem cell or neural precursor (NP) transplantation, primarily in models of focal TBI [10]. Much less is known about the role of stem cell therapies in DAI/TAI. Axonal repair as a target of treatment separate from nerve cell regeneration is not as well established in TBI as in spinal cord injury, and this is especially true with the problem of myelin repair/remyelination [11]. However, demyelination appears to contribute to degeneration of axons in TAI [12, 13] and TAI is associated with active and ongoing attempts at axonal repair [14]. Therefore, adding exogenous oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) may furnish competent oligodendrocytes that can assist in remyelination/myelin remodeling and prevent axonal degeneration or help myelinate regenerating axons in TAI.
Animal models are invaluable tools in establishing proof of concept that remyelination by exogenously provided oligodendrocytes is possible in TAI settings. Models of inertial acceleration and impact acceleration (IA) are frequently used for experimental studies of DAI/TAI [5, 15]. In the present study we use the IA model of DAI/TAI [16] and transplant human embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived OPCs (hOPCs) into the deep sensorimotor cortex next to the corpus callosum. Our findings indicate that exogenous hOPCs differentiate into mature oligodendrocytes, migrate extensively along white matter tracts, and begin to myelinate host axons. Our data are consistent with the view that stem cell grafts may serve as effective myelin remodeling tools in TBI scenarios featured by DAI/TAI.
Materials and methods
Human embryonic stem cell culture and differentiation to human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells
The human ESC line H9 from WiCell (Madison, WI, USA) was maintained according to standard stem cell culture protocols. H9 cells (WA-09; passages 30 to 41) were grown on mitotically inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblasts essentially as described in [17]. hOPCs were generated through extensive passaging as neurospheres based on the method of Hu and colleagues [18, 19] with minor modifications (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The ventralizing factor sonic hedgehog (SHH; 100 ng/mL) along with the caudalizing factor retinoic acid (0.1 μM) were used to initially pattern neuroepithelial cells; glial differentiation medium (GDM; Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12, B27 without vitamin A, N1, MEM-NEAA, cAMP, biotin, 60 ng/mL triiodothyronine, 10 ng/mL platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)1 and neurotrophin (NT)3) was used for further differentiation. Cells were trypsinized with TrypLE (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) at day 84 after induction of differentiation, counted, and plated on p-L-ornithine- and laminin-coated plates. Cells were grown in GDM supplemented with PDGF-AA, IGF1 and NT3 for 12 days, then trypsinized, counted, and resuspended at high concentration (2.0 × 108 per mL), and finally transplanted on day 98 after induction of differentiation.
Characterization of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells used for transplantation with immunocytochemistry
Two weeks before transplantation (on day 84, a time point chosen to correspond to the remaining time in differentiation of hOPCs destined for transplantation), hOPC neurospheres were trypsinized with TrypLE and counted. Twenty thousand cells were plated on polyornithine- and laminin-coated coverslips or Matrigel-coated four-well slide chambers and cultured in GDM supplemented with PDGF, IGF and NT3 for 2 weeks. Cultures were then fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 20 minutes and then subjected to immunocytochemistry with the oligodendrocytic markers A2B5, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)α, NG2, Sox10, and O4; the neuronal marker type III-tubulin epitope J1 (TUJ1); astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP); and the mesodermal marker bone morphogenetic protein 4 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Target phenotypes | Target proteins/epitopes | Host | Dilution | Vendor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Human cell markers | Human Nuclei Protein antibody (HNu) | Mouse | 1:1,000 | Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA |
Human cytoplasm-specific antibody (SC121) | Mouse | 1:3,000 | StemCells, Inc., CA, USA | |
Neuron (in vivo) | Type III-tubulin epitope J1 (TUJ1) | Rabbit | 1:400 | Covance, Berkeley, CA, USA |
Neuron (in vitro) | Type III-tubulin epitope J1 (TUJ1) | Mouse | 1:100 | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA |
Mitotic marker | Ki67 antigen (NCL-Ki67p) | Rabbit | 1:400 | Novocastra Labs, Newcastle, UK |
Axon | Neurofilament heavy chain | Rabbit | 1:200 | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA |
Progenitor/early oligodendrocyte | Olig2 | Goat | 1:50 | Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA |
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα) | Rabbit | 1:100 | Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA | |
A2B5 | Mouse | 1:200 | Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA | |
NG2 | Rabbit | 1:100 | Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA | |
O4 | Mouse | 1:100 | Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA | |
Late oligodendrocyte | Myelin basic protein (MBP) | Rabbit | 1:200 | Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA |
Adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC) | Rabbit | 1:200 | Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA | |
Astrocyte (in vivo) | Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) | Rabbit | 1:400 | Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA |
Astrocyte (in vitro) | Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) | Rabbit | 1:100 | Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA |
Mesodermal marker | Bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP4) | Mouse | 1:300 | Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA |
Animals and surgical procedures
Ten-week old male nude rats (Crl:NIH-Foxn1rnu; Charles River, Wilmington, MA, USA) were used for hOPC transplantation. Nude rats were chosen because immunodeficient animals yield greater engraftment and survival of human cells than immunocompetent animals treated with immunosuppressants [20]. All surgical procedures were carried out according to protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions using gas anesthesia (isoflurane:oxygen:nitrous oxide = 1:33:66) and aseptic methods. In order to explore the fate of transplanted hOPCs and compare differentiation between injured and uninjured scenarios, animals were separated into IA and sham groups. In the IA group, animals were subjected to injury with full artificial ventilation as described by Marmarou and colleagues [16]. In the present experiments, we employed a severe TBI regimen using a 450 g weight that was freely dropped onto the steel disc through a Plexiglass tube from a height of 2 meters. In the sham group, animals received all aspects of the regimen except the injury itself (weight on the steel disc). One week after injury, a time point that appears to optimize survival and differentiation [21, 22], 200,000 live hOPCs were transplanted into two sites 1 mm apart in the right deep motor cortex next to the corpus callosum (1 mm and 0 mm anterior to bregma, 2 mm lateral to midline and 3 mm ventral to pia) of either injured (n = 10) or sham (n = 5) animals using procedures that have been detailed in our published work [21, 23, 24]. To explore the progress of differentiation of transplanted hOPCs in the TAI environment, animals in the TAI group were allowed to survive for 6 weeks and 3 months. Sham animals with transplanted hOPCs were euthanized at 3 months.
Histology, immunohistochemistry and microscopy
Brain tissues were prepared from animals perfused transcardially with 4 % phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde. The axonal injury, survival, location and phenotypic fate of hOPC grafts were assessed with ABC peroxidase immunohistochemistry (IHC) and dual-label fluorescent IHC in serial coronal or sagittal sections (40 μm) through the brain as described previously [22, 24, 25]. Axonal injury was studied with well-established TAI markers, including an antibody against the amyloid precursor protein (APP), the monoclonal antibody RMO14 binding to the rod domain of neurofilaments H and M, and a monoclonal antibody against the 68-kDa light chain neurofilament protein. hOPC survival was studied with human-specific nuclei (HNu) or human-specific cytoplasm (SC121) antibody using immunoperoxidase or immunofluorescence labeling. Differentiation was studied with dual-label immunofluorescence combining HNu or SC121 with other oligodendrocyte markers - that is, the progenitor and early marker PDGFRα, the early markers O4 and GalC and late markers myelin basic protein (MBP) and adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC). Appositions between axons and transplant-derived oligodendrocytes were visualized with the combination of antibodies against the heavy neurofilament subunit (NF-H) and the SC121 epitope as generic axonal and transplant-derived cell markers, respectively. The nuclear mitotic marker Ki67, the early neuronal marker TUJ1 and the astroglial cell marker GFAP were also used in separate co-localization experiments with HNu or SC121 as described elsewhere [22, 24, 26, 27]. All antibody information is listed in Table 1. The Gallyas silver staining method [28] was used to evaluate injured and/or degenerating axons and terminals. For this purpose, sections were processed with a commercially available kit (NeuroSilver kit II; FD Neurotechnologies, Ellicott City, MD, USA) as described previously [29].
Stained sections were studied on a Zeiss Axiophot microscope equipped for epifluorescence (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, MI, USA) or a Zeiss LSM 510 inverted confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Oberkochen, Germany). Confocal microscopic images were captured with pinhole set at 0.8 μm to ensure co-localization of multiple labels at the same resolution level as semithin sections. Three-dimensional reconstruction by Z-stack scanning through regions of interest was acquired with LSM software (Carl Zeiss Inc., Oberkochen, Germany). Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for montaging and image processing. All staining, image collection, and quantification were done in a fashion blind to group assignment.
Ultrastructural immunohistochemistry
Myelin formation by transplanted hOPCs was assessed ultrastructurally with electron microscopy using standard pre-embedding immunoperoxidase-3,3'-diaminobenzidine IHC for the human cytoplasmic antigen SC121 as described previously [23–25, 30]. Briefly, brain sections prepared as in the previous section were treated with a solution containing 4 % paraformaldehyde and 0.2 % glutaraldehyde for 24 hours. Sections were then rinsed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 3 to 10 minutes, immersed in 1 % osmium tetroxide for 15 minutes, dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol, embedded in Poly/Bed 812 (Polysciences Inc., Warrington, PA, USA), polymerized at 60 °C for 72 hours, and then finally embedded in BEEM® capsules (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Half the sections were stained en block in uranyl acetate prior to embedding. Serial ultrathin sections were collected on Formvar-coated slotted grids and viewed with a Hitachi H7600 transmission electron microscope equipped with a 2 k×2 k bottom mount AMT XR-100 CCD camera (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Only sections that were not stained with uranyl acetate were used for studying ensheathment profiles originating in hOPC transplants.
Stereological quantification of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cell survival and differentiation
Numbers of surviving hOPCs were counted in serial, systematically and randomly sampled coronal sections based on the optical fractionator concept with the aid of a motorized stage Axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc.) equipped with Stereo Investigator (MicroBrightField Bioscience, lliston, VT, USA) as described previously [22]. To evaluate the migration and possible final residing location of differentiating hOPCs, only the contralateral side of transplantation was examined. hOPCs in corpus callosum and cortex were also counted separately for this purpose. Every twelfth serial coronal section through the transplant/injury site was selected for stereological analysis. The counting frame was set at 50×50 μm and the sampling grid and counting depth were 200×200 μm and 10 μm, respectively. Cells around the transplantation site were not counted because of difficulties in discerning individual cells in the densely packed center of the transplant.
Differentiation of survived hOPCs was estimated in a non-stereological fashion as described previously [27]. Briefly, we counted the total number of SC121(+) cells, as well as cells dually labeled with SC121 and the mature oligodendrocyte marker MBP from our immunofluorescent preparations, on randomly selected fields of cortex and corpus callosum using 40× magnification and avoiding the transplantation site. At least three fields in each of four serial sections were used from each animal. Numbers of SC121(+) and double-labeled profiles were pooled from each case and grouped per experimental protocol. Average numbers of single- and double-labeled cells were generated for two TBI groups and one Sham group (n = 5 per group). Differentiation rate was expressed as percentage of SC121 and MBP double-labeled cells in the population of SC121(+) cells.
Migration mapping of oligodendrocyte lineage cells derived from human oligodendrocyte progenitor cell grafts
The positions of all SC121(+) cells were mapped on every twelfth coronal section through brain levels containing the grafted cells and their lineage using Neurolucida software (MicroBrightField Bioscience). Representative cells differentiated from hOPCs and their processes were also traced with Neurolucida software.
Statistical methods
Variance between and across samples of numbers of oligodendrocyte-lineage cells classified by experimental history (IA versus sham), migratory destination in brain (corpus callosum versus neocortex), and time point after transplantation (6 weeks or 3 months) was analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or t test. In the case of ANOVA, significant differences were further analyzed with post hoc tests to reveal important main effects or interactions. Statistical analyses were performed with STATISTICA 8.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
Results
Axonal injury in nude rats using the impact acceleration model
Immunocompromised nude rats were used here to avoid immune rejection of human cell xenografts into rodent brain [20]. Because the original IA model was developed in Sprague-Dawley [16] and Wistar [31] rats, we first explored whether the same IA settings as the ones used in those strains can cause TAI in nude rats. Induction of TAI was studied with IHC strategies routinely used in TBI studies - that is, antibodies against APP, the monoclonal antibody RMO14 binding to the rod domain of neurofilament heavy and medium chains that are exposed after lesion-induced sidearm proteolysis, and a monoclonal antibody against the 68-kDa light chain neurofilament protein (NF68). IHC was used in brain sections from nude rats exposed to a standard severe IA injury (450 g weight drop from a height of 2 meters) [16]. Tissues were also processed with a modification of the Gallyas silver method. Twenty-four hours post-injury, APP, RMO14 and NF68 IHC consistently labeled axonal pathologies such as undulated axons, axonal swellings and bulbs in the corpus callosum and the corticospinal tract as described in several published studies [32–35] (data not shown). Argyrophilic axonal degeneration based on Gallyas silver staining became evident 1 week post-injury in the corpus callosum (Fig. 1a), the optic tract and the corticospinal tract (Fig. 1b). Axonal degeneration labeled with Gallyas silver was still present in the corpus callosum (Fig. 1c), corticospinal tract (Fig. 1d) and other white matter tracts 3 months post-injury. These data suggest that the pattern of TAI in nude rates exposed to IA injury is qualitatively similar to the one described for Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats and, therefore, the nude rat model is suitable for research into hOPC transplantation outcomes in a diffuse TBI background.
Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in vitro
As per Hu and colleague’s original description [18, 19], columnar epithelial cells began to appear and organize into rosettes 10 days after induction of differentiation of embryoid bodies with human ESC medium without fibroblast growth factor (FGF)2 (DMEM/F12, Knockout serum replacer, MEM-nonessential amino acid, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 4 ng/mL FGF2) for 3 days and then with neural differentiation medium (NDM; DMEM/F12, N2, MEM-nonessential amino acid, 2 ug/mL heparin) for 6 days. Neuroepithelial cells were initially cultured in the presence of 0.1 μM retinoic acid on laminin-coated plates for 4 days as described by Hu and colleagues [18]. The resulting rosette-rich colonies were manually detached and grown into spheres and then continued to be patterned with retinoic acid and SHH for 10 more days. To generate pre-oligodendrocyte progenitors, spheres were passaged by Accutase and cultured in NDM supplemented with B27, SHH (100 ng/mL) and FGF2 (10 ng/mL) for 10 days. For further differentiation into hOPCs, spheres were cultured in GDM (DMEM/F12, N1, B27, MEM-nonessential amino acid, 60 ng/mL T3, 1 μM cAMP, 0.1 μg/mL biotin) supplemented with SHH, PDGF-AA, IGF1 and NT3 for 2 weeks and then dissociated by Accutase and continued to be feed with the same GDM without SHH (day 49). Every 2 or 3 weeks, the spheres were passaged by the same dissociation method using Accutase and cultured in the same GDM with PDGF-AA, IGF1 and NT3. On day 84 after induction of differentiation, spheres were trypsinized into dissociated hOPCs, plated and cultured further as in Materials and methods. On day 98, cells were detached from the plate and resuspended at a high concentration (2.0 × 108 per mL) for transplantation.
As described in Materials and methods, the cell composition of hOPC transplants was analyzed in a representative sample of cells destined for transplantation with immunocytochemistry for protein markers of various neural cell lineages [36–39] (Fig. 2). Results show that only a small percentage of hOPCs (less than 10 %) expressed the neuronal marker TUJ1, an even smaller percentage (less than 1 %) were positive for astrocytic markers (GFAP), and no bone morphogenetic protein(+) mesodermal-lineage cells were detected (Fig. 2a-c). In contrast, these hOPC samples were enriched for cells expressing oligodendrocyte-lineage markers including A2B5, PDGFRα, O4, NG2, Sox10 and MBP (Fig. 2d-i).
Survival and migration of transplanted human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in the rat brain
Human OPCs were transplanted into the deep sensorimotor cortex of IA- and sham-injured rats. Transplanted hOPCs survived very well in the brains of injured and uninjured animals and migrated extensively away from the transplantation site in both groups. We mapped and counted migratory profiles at 6 weeks and 3 months post-transplantation. For the time point of 6 weeks we have data only on IA-injured animals. In the case of 3 months, we have data from both IA-injured and sham animals.
At 6 weeks, there was some migration of transplant-derived SC121(+) human cells into the ipsilateral corpus callosum and external capsule and into the contralateral corpus callosum adjacent to cingulate gyrus (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). At 3 months, transplanted cells had migrated much further (Figs. 3 and 4). hOPCs had densely populated the ipsilateral corpus callosum and the entire length of the external capsule and reached further into the corpus callosum and external capsule on the contralateral side; some cells had entered the contralateral neocortex (Fig. 4). In many cases, these cells had migrated 5 mm or more in antero-posterior distance from the transplantation site (Fig. 4). There was little migration into the gray matter, and cortical invasion of hOPCs was limited to layers adjacent to corpus callosum (lower layer 6). In the case of migration into the neostriatum (Fig. 4), hOPCs were localized strictly inside the white matter striae.
Stereological counts of transplant-derived cells contralateral to the injection side provide a good measure of the migratory potential of transplanted hOPCs. Cell counts in IA-injured animals at 6 weeks and 3 months show massive and progressive migration into the corpus callosum and adjacent cortical layer 6 (Fig. 5). For example, the number of oligodendrocyte-lineage cells in the contralateral corpus callosum is 30 times higher at 3 months compared to 6 weeks (Fig. 5a). Two-way ANOVA examining interaction between time and location shows that time tends to advance the position of cells from the corpus callosum into deep cortical layers (Fig. 5a). Experimental history (IA versus sham) shows no effect on numbers of oligodendrocyte-lineage cells in corpus callosum or cortex at 3 months. There are about three to four times as many oligodendrocyte-lineage cells in corpus callosum compared to cortical layer 6 in both IA-injured and sham animals (Fig. 5b). Two-way ANOVA addressing the interaction between experimental history and location shows no significant effect (that is, lesion does not promote more advanced migration into deep cortical layers).
At 3 months post-transplantation, a majority of oligodendrocyte-lineage cells around the transplantation site (the triangular region of Fig. 3) had round perikaryal profiles and multiple radial processes consistent with type I morphology (Fig. 6a-c) [40]. On the other hand, the majority of transplant-derived cells in the corpus callosum were spindle-shaped with parallel processes consistent with type II morphology (Fig. 6d-f) [40]. In the gray matter away from the injection site (ipsilateral or contralateral), cytology was mixed.
Very few (less than 1 %) hOPCs at the transplantation site or within the main migratory domains (corpus callosum and deep neocortex) were positive for the mitotic marker-Ki67 at 6 weeks or 3 months, in injured or sham animals. This pattern suggests that, at the time points studied here, surviving cells are not proliferative at the original transplant site or in their migratory paths and destinations (Fig. 7).
Differentiation of transplanted human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in the rat brain
At 6 weeks and 3 months post-transplantation, under either IA or sham conditions, no neurons and very few astrocytes were derived from transplanted hOPCs (Fig. 8a,b). The majority of transplanted cells were identified as PDGFRα(+) (Fig. 8i-k) or MBP(+) (Fig. 8c-h) profiles in both the transplantation site and migratory pathways/destinations. MBP immunoreactivity was expressed in both round and spindle-shaped oligodendrocyte profiles derived from the transplant (Fig. 8c-h). At 3 months, most transplant-derived cells around the transplantation site, in corpus callosum, and deep cortical layers were also APC(+) (Fig. 8l-n).
In the area surrounding the transplantation site of IA-injured animals, cell counts of PDGFRα(+) profiles show that 74.6 ± 9 % of graft-derived cells are PDGFRα(+) at 6 weeks post-transplantation; this number is significantly reduced to 49.4 ± 11 % at 3 months. Conversely, the percentage of MBP(+) oligodendrocytes derived from hOPCs is significantly higher at 3 months (67.8 ± 12 %) compared to 6 weeks (37.1 ± 9 %) (Fig. 9a, left). A similar pattern is seen in the corpus callosum (Fig. 9a, right), but trends in this case do not reach statistical significance. In the area surrounding the transplantation site, there are no significant differences in PDGFRα(+) or MBP(+) cell rates between sham and injured animals (Fig. 9b, left). In the corpus callosum, the percentage of MBP(+) cells is significantly higher in injured animals compared to shams (Fig. 9b, right).
Confocal microscopy with three-dimensional image reconstruction for SC121- and NF-H-immunoreactive structures was used to visualize appositions between SC121(+) processes belonging to transplant-derived cells and NF-H(+) SC121(−) host axons. Reconstructed confocal images demonstrated many ensheathing appositions between processes of transplant-derived oligodendrocytes and host axons (Fig. 10).
Ultrastructural IHC for the human cytosolic epitope SC121 was used to disclose the involvement of transplant-derived oligodendrocyte processes in the ensheathment of host-derived axons or the formation of myelin. In a pattern similar to the one revealed with confocal microscopy, semi-thin preparations accompanying thin sections showed SC121(+) processes co-localizing with toluidine blue-stained myelin sheaths (Fig. 11a). Using thin sections, we found numerous SC121(+) cytoplasmic projections juxtaposed to or ensheathing unlabeled (host) axons. Ensheathment was featured by complex configurations, including the presence of outer and inner cytoplasmic tongues and close juxtapositions with compact myelin (Fig. 11b,c). It was not possible to ascertain whether compact myelin belonging to the same host axons, as SC121(+) sheaths were continuous with the latter in our preparations because the cytoplasmic human epitope SC121 would not be expected to be present within dense myelin.
Discussion
Our findings indicate that the IA model of Marmarou can be effectively replicated in the nude rat background. Using the nude rat IA model, hOPC transplants survive well in the deep sensorimotor cortex and behave in a fashion very different from NPs; that is, they migrate massively and show almost exclusive affinity for white matter tracts, especially the corpus callosum and adjacent white matter in deep cortical layers. The progressive migration of transplanted hOPCs is accompanied by progressive maturation into MBP(+) and APC(+) oligodendrocytes that ensheath host axons. Our findings provide further support to the notion that human ESCs and neural stem cells can be coaxed to specific fates that continue to progress to fully differentiated progenies after transplantation into the adult CNS. These progenies behave in a fashion that is strikingly similar to indigenous differentiated neural cells. Given the very low level of proliferation of transplanted cells as early as 6 weeks post-transplantation and their prompt differentiation into mature oligodendrocytes, the possibility of overgrowth and, hence, tumorigenic risk is very low. We postulate that the high numbers of cells present in the contralateral hemisphere by 3 months had started as pre-existing hOPCs in the dense center of the transplant and did not derive from ongoing cell divisions.
The use of human ESCs such as line H9 was based on a number of considerations including: thorough characterization and inexhaustible supply of the parent line [41–44]; great versatility to differentiate to any neural cell type in sufficient quantity for transplantation [18, 43–50]; and well-established methods for in vitro manipulation to fate determination prior to transplantation. The choice of human ESCs is based on availability and access considerations, the greater translational value of such cells, and a long experience in our laboratory using human cells as transplants in rodent hosts [21–24, 27, 50–54].
In adulthood, the sources of usable stem cells or neural progenitors in the CNS are limited to a few forebrain niches, and the yield or repair potential of such niches is low. For example, in mouse models of multiple sclerosis, the limited recruitment of endogenous hOPCs into demyelination sites does not suffice for effective remyelination [55]. Therefore, supplementation of such limited stem cell pools with exogenous progenitors is a reasonable first step for a cellular therapy. Besides providing sources of fully differentiated nerve cells competent to replenish lost cells, transplanted progenitors also release neuroprotective molecules [27, 56] and, importantly, may induce endogenous stem cells/progenitor cells to proliferate and differentiate as auxiliary niches, thereby improving the efficacy of self-repair mechanisms [52].
Generation of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells from human embryonic stem cells
In the body of in vivo studies reported here, we used hOPCs that were prepared from human ESC line H9 following the methods described by Hu and colleagues with minor modifications [19, 45, 57]. Our experience with culturing and differentiating H9 cells and then characterizing the derived hOPCs in vitro is very similar to the original description of Hu and colleagues; hOPCs derived in this manner express PDGFRα, NG2, O4, and Sox10, a pattern consistent with a classical hOPC identity [36]. Methodological issues concerning hOPC derivation are very important, because the use of highly concentrated hOPCs for grafting is key for achieving the desired outcomes (that is, myelination of host axons) within a limited time period.
Differentiation of human ESCs into hOPCs is a longer and more arduous process than the one leading to neuronal progenitors. In work reported here we initially used two methods [18, 58] for deriving and characterizing hOPCs prior to transplantation. In our hands, the method of Hu and colleagues appeared to be more successful in generating viable transplants, although this observation was not confirmed in a systematic fashion. Major differences between the two methods are: trophic factors used; extracellular matrix used; enzyme used to passage the cells; length of time in three-dimensional culture; and timing of hOPC harvest. In previous published work, the method of Nistor and colleagues generated hOPCs with good viability after transplantation [58–62], but the transplantation site of these authors (spinal cord) was different from ours (neocortex). Interestingly, the same team of investigators reported that their hOPCs did not survive past 2 weeks after transplantation in animal models of multiple sclerosis, but these mice were immunocompetent C57B6 mice [63]. Our in vivo outcomes using hOPCs prepared as per Hu and colleagues are consistent with the ones reported by that team on shiverer mice [19].
Issues related to in vivo differentiation of human oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants
Two important trends in hOPC maturation were the progressive phenotypic differentiation in the transplantation area and the higher rate of maturation of hOPCs in the corpus callosum of injured subjects. With respect to the former, we have observations only from IA-injured animals, but we speculate that there is a similar differentiation trend in control (sham) animals. We also postulate that differentiation trends in the corpus callosum are not too dissimilar to those in the cortex around the transplantation site and that differences in significance may be caused by the fact that hOPC maturation may be earlier in the white matter [64] compared to grey matter. Regarding the latter, it would appear that injury may contribute to hOPC differentiation; the difference between corpus callosum and cortex around the transplantation site may be due to the fact that cortex is not a primary site of injury in the IA model that preferentially affects white matter tracts. We have previously reported that the injured spinal cord niche influences both the proliferation and differentiation of human CNS stem cells propagated as neurospheres [65].
The role of injured or otherwise pathological environment as a niche for differentiation deserves further commentary. Environments associated with acquired neurological injury such as stroke and spinal cord injury have been shown to promote endogenous stem cell differentiation [9, 66, 67] and this effect may be mediated, in part, by trophic and cytokine signals such as stem cell factor [68], stromal cell-derived factor 1α [69], FGF-2 [70], vascular endothelial growth factor [71], ciliary neurotrophic factor, and CXC chemokine receptor 4 [72]. Some of these factors are known to act as tropic cues for migration or to specify the definitive phenotype of endogenous or exogenous stem cells [68, 73–79].
The invasion of migrated hOPCs and their differentiated progenies into deep cortical layers matches native cortical myelination patterns; these patterns show an overall denser myelination in lower cortical layers and variable myelination in superficial layers. It is also interesting that, at least up to 3 months post-transplantation, the differentiated progeny of transplanted hOPCs does not advance to more superficial layers. This distribution is identical to that of native mature oligodendrocytes; in contrast to hOPCs that are radially spread across cortical layers, oligodendrocytes favor deep layers and follow the deep-to-superficial-layer myelin gradient [80].
The presumed intent of OPC transplants as cell therapies is the replenishment of damaged or destroyed myelin sheaths. Although molecular myelin markers such as MBP may be telling of the myelin-forming potential of OPCs and their progenies, they do not directly show that MBP(+) cells are forming myelin. The three-dimensional reconstruction of confocal images indicates a close, ensheathment-like, apposition of host axons with processes of transplant-derived oligodendrocytes, but the presence of structurally mature myelin can only be ascertained ultrastructurally. Using ultrastructural IHC or electron microscopy combined with histochemistry, previous studies have demonstrated the ability of specific progenies of neural stem cells or OPCs to ensheath [21] or increase the thickness of abnormal myelin sheaths in hosts [19, 26, 59, 61, 81, 82], but labeling of exogenously derived myelin is technically difficult. In the present study, ultrastructural IHC divulges that transplant-derived cells ensheath host axons in intimate proximity to myelin sheaths, but the host-versus-transplant identity of the myelin itself is difficult to ascertain. The human cell marker SC121 is a cytosolic marker and, therefore, it is found in oligodendrocyte cytoplasmic projections and ensheathing tongues but not in the membranous myelin sheath itself. Unstained preparations that were used here have not been particularly useful, primarily because of this reason. Furthermore, existing myelin antibodies cannot resolve between human and rodent myelin and this problem limits their usefulness in confocal microscopy or ultrastructural IHC.
Ultimately, the proof of concept that remyelination or myelin remodeling by OPC transplants can be beneficial in TAI/DAI will depend on the demonstration that such exogenous OPCs afford functional benefits. In the case of IA-injured rodents, such benefits can be sought out in a number of behavioral domains. One approach is assessment of motor control, which depends on the intactness of the corticospinal tract. Experiments addressing functional repair with exogenous OPCs have been successfully performed in models of spinal cord injury [10, 11] and demyelination [82–85]. In TBI models, motor recovery may occur within the first month after injury in the absence of any therapy, making the assessment of the efficacy of cell therapies more challenging. In such models, the assessment of efficacy or human neural cell therapies may be more straightforward using tasks of cognition or anxious/emotional disposition, faculties that become chronically impaired in rodent TBI. Chronicity of deficits is important because these human cells may take months to proliferate, migrate and terminally differentiate [15].
Stem cell transplantation as experimental therapy for traumatic brain injury
Some success in models of ischemic brain injury [9] has encouraged the use of stem cell/NP transplantation in models of focal TBI [10, 86]. However, because of the complexity of TBI and its animal models, there is a need to identify specific repair targets based on key pathological mechanisms. Such repair tasks include replacing dead neurons, supporting injured neurons, and protecting axons or assisting with axonal repair/regeneration. The problem of neuronal injury/death is encountered both in focal injury [87, 88] and in the course of TAI [89, 90]. Neuronal cell death in focal TBI is acute and has necrotic components, whereas in TAI/DAI it is slow with apoptotic features and may be associated with retrograde and trans-synaptic effects [8, 89, 91]. Although axonal repair/remyelination as a therapeutic target separate from neuronal regeneration is best established in spinal cord injury [11], there is evidence that demyelination may contribute to degeneration of axons in TAI [12, 13]. Therefore, contributing exogenous hOPCs in the case of TAI may assist in remyelination and prevent axonal degeneration and disconnection within brain circuits.
There is very little published work on stem cell-based therapies for models of TAI/DAI. However, the field of TBI and more specifically TAI/DAI can borrow from spinal cord injury that invariably involves trauma in long tracts [59, 60, 92–96]. Experimental cell therapies in animal models of spinal cord injury have utilized various stem cell preparations including neurospheres and OPCs [59, 60, 96, 97], and there are several ongoing clinical trials using neural stem cells [98, 99]. In one report, OPCs were found to remyelinate and restore locomotion after contusional spinal cord injury in rodents [59], but functional recovery reported in this study occurred within 12 days of transplant, a time point that is too early with respect to migration and terminal differentiation of OPCs. In contrast to spinal cord injury, where long tracts course in relatively circumscribed areas, DAI involves disparate white matter tracts [100, 101] and it would be difficult to transplant cells into all these sites. Therefore, transplantation route (systemic, ventricular, and parenchymal) and location of transplant (in the case of parenchymal delivery) are critical. The choice of transplantation site may be based on factors such as concentration of axonal pathology or sites of injury responsible for critical symptoms. The choice of transplantation into deep sensorimotor cortex in the present study was based on the expectation that this site would provide oligodendrocytes for both the corpus callosum and the corticospinal tract, which are affected in the IA injury [16, 35]. Our findings indicate that there was little, if any, invasion of cells into the internal capsule by 3 months, but the extensive migration of OPCs via the corpus callosum and descending tracts and their remarkable differentiation into mature oligodendrocytes predicts a broader remyelination potential with longer survival times. Of course, transplantation sites can also be optimized to the desired functional outcome or involve multiple locations as we have shown in models of motor neuron disease [23, 52, 53].
Conclusions
In conclusion, the findings in this study support the idea that hOPCs can serve as a competent source of mature oligodendrocytes that ensheath CNS axons after TAI, and provide proof of concept that regenerative strategies targeting myelin remodeling can be further considered in TBI models in the future. In addition, we demonstrate that the nude rat is a suitable animal model for studying human cell transplants in neurotrauma. In view of the fact that stem cell therapies are being progressively introduced in clinical trials of neurodegenerative and traumatic diseases of the CNS [11, 98, 102–108], these timely results should encourage further translational work targeting the problem of axonal degeneration in the context of DAI and, specifically, interventions designed to regenerate or remodel the myelin sheath.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO) grant to VEK funded as companion to CIRM grant TR2-01767 to BJC. We would like to thank Ms Devon Hitt who offered great technical help with immunostaining and collection of some quantitative data.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA
analysis of variance
- APC
adenomatous polyposis coli protein
- APP
amyloid precursor protein
- CNS
central nervous system
- DAI
diffuse axonal injury
- DMEM
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
- ESC
embryonic stem cell
- FGF
fibroblast growth factor
- GDM
glial differentiation medium
- GFAP
glial fibrillary acidic protein
- hOPC
human oligodendrocyte progenitor cell
- IA
impact acceleration
- IGF
insulin-like growth factor
- IHC
immunohistochemistry
- MBP
myelin basic protein
- NDM
neural differentiation medium
- NP
neural precursor
- NY
neurotrophin
- OPC
oligodendrocyte progenitor cell
- PDGF
platelet-derived growth factor
- PDGFR
platelet-derived growth factor receptor
- SHH
sonic hedgehog
- TAI
traumatic axonal injury
- TBI
traumatic brain injury
- TUJ1
type III-tubulin epitope J1
Additional files
Footnotes
Leyan Xu and Jiwon Ryu contributed equally to this work.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
LX, configured the details of experimental plan, performed all animal surgeries and IHC staining, analyzed in vivo data and prepared the first draft of manuscript. JR, established and maintained human OPC cultures and characterized them prior to transplantation. HH, performed ultrastructural IHC. AM, performed stereological counts of PDGFRα and MBD(+) cells derived from the OPC transplant. AA, helped with stereology. ER, performed mapping and stereological counting of migrated OPC-lineage cells. VM, participated in the design of the project and assisted in IHC. BJC, participated in the design of the project and edited the manuscript. VEK, principal investigator, designed the project, troubleshot the experiments and prepared the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Authors’ information
LX (MD PhD) is an expert on stem cell therapies for animal models of neurological disease and animal models of traumatic brain injury. JR (PhD) is an expert in embryonic and neural stem cell culture and manipulation techniques. HH (PhD) specializes in electron microscope techniques for the nervous system. AM, AA and ER are undergraduate students at Johns Hopkins University. VM (PhD) is an expert in embryonic and neural stem cell culture and manipulation techniques. BJC (PhD) is an expert in stem cell biology and animal models of neurodegeneration and neurotrauma. VEK (MD) is an expert in neural injury and repair, neurodegenerative disease, and traumatic brain injury.
Contributor Information
Leyan Xu, Email: lxu9@jhmi.edu.
Jiwon Ryu, Email: jryu4@jhmi.edu.
Hakim Hiel, Email: hhiel1@jhmi.edu.
Adarsh Menon, Email: amen692@gmail.com.
Ayushi Aggarwal, Email: ayushi1@umbc.edu.
Elizabeth Rha, Email: lizrha@gmail.com.
Vasiliki Mahairaki, Email: vmachai1@jhmi.edu.
Brian J Cummings, Email: cummings@uci.edu.
Vassilis E Koliatsos, Email: koliat@jhmi.edu.
References
- 1.Mac Donald CL, Johnson AM, Cooper D, Nelson EC, Werner NJ, Shimony JS, et al. Detection of blast-related traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2091–2100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mckee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Stein TD, Alvarez VE, Daneshvar DH, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain. 2013;136:43–64. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, Hurst RW, Kauder DR, Gennarelli TA, et al. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1583–1589. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Geddes JF, Whitwell HL, Graham DI. Traumatic axonal injury: practical issues for diagnosis in medicolegal cases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2000;26:105–116. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.026002105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang HC, Ma YB. Experimental models of traumatic axonal injury. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.07.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Adams JH, Doyle D, Graham DI, Lawrence AE, McLellan DR. Microscopic diffuse axonal injury in cases of head injury. Med Sci Law. 1985;25:265–269. doi: 10.1177/002580248502500407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Adams JH, Graham DI, Thompson CJ, Marcincin RP. Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann Neurol. 1982;12:564–574. doi: 10.1002/ana.410120611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Buki A, Povlishock JT. All roads lead to disconnection? Traumatic axonal injury revisited. Acta Neurochir. 2006;148:181–193. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0674-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burns TC, Verfaillie CM, Low WC. Stem cells for ischemic brain injury: a critical review. J Comp Neurol. 2009;515:125–144. doi: 10.1002/cne.22038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Richardson RM, Singh A, Sun D, Fillmore HL, Dietrich DW, Bullock MR. Stem cell biology in traumatic brain injury: effects of injury and strategies for repair. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:1125–1138. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kwon BK, Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Emerging repair, regeneration, and translational research advances for spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S263–70. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Maxwell WL. Damage to myelin and oligodendrocytes: a role in chronic outcomes following traumatic brain injury? Brain Sci. 2013;3:1374–1394. doi: 10.3390/brainsci3031374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maxwell WL, Domleo A, McColl G, Jafari SS, Graham DI. Post-acute alterations in the axonal cytoskeleton after traumatic axonal injury. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20:151–168. doi: 10.1089/08977150360547071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Singleton RH, Zhu JP, Stone JR, Povlishock JT. Traumatically induced axotomy adjacent to the soma does not result in acute neuronal death. J Neurosci. 2002;22:791–802. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00791.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gold EM, Su D, Lopez-Velazquez L, Haus DL, Perez H, Lacuesta GA, et al. Functional assessment of long-term deficits in rodent models of traumatic brain injury. Regen Med. 2013;8:483–516. doi: 10.2217/rme.13.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marmarou A, Foda MAA, Vandenbrink W, Campbell J, Kita H, Demetriadou K. A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats. 1. Pathophysiology and biomechanics. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:291–300. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pankratz MT, Li XJ, Lavaute TM, Lyons EA, Chen X, Zhang SC. Directed neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells via an obligated primitive anterior stage. Stem Cells. 2007;25:1511–1520. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu BY, Du ZW, Zhang SC. Differentiation of human oligodendrocytes from pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1614–1622. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hu BY, Du ZW, Li XJ, Ayala M, Zhang SC. Human oligodendrocytes from embryonic stem cells: conserved SHH signaling networks and divergent FGF effects. Development. 2009;136:1443–1452. doi: 10.1242/dev.029447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Anderson AJ, Haus DL, Hooshmand MJ, Perez H, Sontag CJ, Cummings BJ. Achieving stable human stem cell engraftment and survival in the CNS: is the future of regenerative medicine immunodeficient? Regen Med. 2011;6:367–406. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yan J, Welsh AM, Bora SH, Snyder EY, Koliatsos VE. Differentiation and tropic/trophic effects of exogenous neural precursors in the adult spinal cord. J Comp Neurol. 2004;480:101–114. doi: 10.1002/cne.20344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yan J, Xu L, Welsh AM, Hatfield G, Hazel T, Johe K, et al. Extensive neuronal differentiation of human neural stem cell grafts in adult rat spinal cord. PLoS Med. 2007;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xu L, Ryugo DK, Pongstaporn T, Johe K, Koliatsos VE. Human neural stem cell grafts in the spinal cord of SOD1 transgenic rats: differentiation and structural integration into the segmental motor circuitry. J Comp Neurol. 2009;514:297–309. doi: 10.1002/cne.22022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nasonkin I, Mahairaki V, Xu L, Hatfield G, Cummings BJ, Eberhart C, et al. Long-term, stable differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursors grafted into the adult mammalian neostriatum. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2414–2426. doi: 10.1002/stem.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koliatsos VE, Price DL, Clatterbuck RE. Motor neurons in Onuf’s nucleus and its rat homologues express the p75 nerve growth factor receptor: sexual dimorphism and regulation by axotomy. J Comp Neurol. 1994;345:510–527. doi: 10.1002/cne.903450404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cummings BJ, Uchida N, Tamaki SJ, Salazar DL, Hooshmand M, Summers R, et al. Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14069–14074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507063102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu L, Yan J, Chen D, Welsh AM, Hazel T, Johe K, et al. Human neural stem cell grafts ameliorate motor neuron disease in SOD-1 transgenic rats. Transplantation. 2006;82:865–875. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000235532.00920.7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gallyas F. Silver staining of Alzheimer’s neurofibrillary changes by means of physical development. Acta Morphol Hung. 1971;19:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koliatsos VE, Cernak I, Xu L, Song Y, Savonenko A, Crain BJ, et al. A mouse model of blast injury to brain: initial pathological, neuropathological, and behavioral characterization. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:399–416. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182189f06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hooshmand MJ, Anderson AJ, Cummings BJ. Improved pre-embedded immuno-electron microscopy procedures to preserve myelin integrity in mammalian central nervous tissue. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Microscopy: advances in scientific research and education. Volume 6(1). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex Research Center; 2014. p. 59–65.
- 31.Engelborghs K, Verlooy J, Van RJ, Van DB, Van DV, Borgers M. Temporal changes in intracranial pressure in a modified experimental model of closed head injury. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:796–806. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kallakuri S, Li Y, Zhou R, Bandaru S, Zakaria N, Zhang L, et al. Impaired axoplasmic transport is the dominant injury induced by an impact acceleration injury device: an analysis of traumatic axonal injury in pyramidal tract and corpus callosum of rats. Brain Res. 2012;1452:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zakaria N, Kallakuri S, Bandaru S, Cavanaugh JM. Temporal assessment of traumatic axonal injury in the rat corpus callosum and optic chiasm. Brain Res. 2012;1467:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marmarou CR, Walker SA, Davis CL, Povlishock JT. Quantitative analysis of the relationship between intra-axonal neurofilament compaction and impaired axonal transport following diffuse traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:1066–1080. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Foda MAA, Marmarou A. A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats. 2. Morphological characterization. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:301–313. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alsanie WF, Niclis JC, Petratos S. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocytes: protocols and perspectives. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:2459–2476. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Iannarelli P, Grist M, Wegner M, Richardson WD, Fogarty M, Nicoletta K. Competing waves of oligodendrocytes in the forebrain and postnatal elimination of an embryonic lineage. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:173–179. doi: 10.1038/nn1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rowitch DH, Kriegstein AR. Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial-cell specification. Nature. 2010;468:214–222. doi: 10.1038/nature09611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Richardson WD, Kessaris N, Pringle N. Oligodendrocyte wars. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:11–18. doi: 10.1038/nrn1826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Suchet S. The morphology and ultrastructure of oligodendrocytes and their functional implication. In: Kettenmann H, Ransom BR, editors. Neuroglia. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; 1995. p. 23–43.
- 41.Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282:1145–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu RH, Peck RM, Li DS, Feng X, Ludwig T, Thomson JA. Basic FGF and suppression of BMP signaling sustain undifferentiated proliferation of human ES cells. Nat Methods. 2005;2:185–190. doi: 10.1038/nmeth744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brustle O, Thomson JA. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:1129–1133. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yan Y, Yang D, Zarnowska ED, Du Z, Werbel B, Valliere C, et al. Directed differentiation of dopaminergic neuronal subtypes from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2005;23:781–790. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hu BY, Zhang SC. Differentiation of spinal motor neurons from pluripotent human stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1295–1304. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li XJ, Du ZW, Zarnowska ED, Pankratz M, Hansen LO, Pearce RA, et al. Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:215–221. doi: 10.1038/nbt1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weick JP, Liu Y, Zhang SC. Human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons adopt and regulate the activity of an established neural network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:20189–20194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108487108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang SC, Lipsitz D, Duncan ID. Self-renewing canine oligodendroglial progenitor expanded as oligospheres. J Neurosci Res. 1998;54:181–190. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19981015)54:2<181::AID-JNR6>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nguyen HX, Nekanti U, Haus DL, Funes G, Moreno D, Kamei N, et al. Induction of early neural precursors and derivation of tripotent neural stem cells from human pluripotent stem cells under xeno-free conditions. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:2767–2783. doi: 10.1002/cne.23604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Haus DL, Nguyen HX, Gold EM, Kamei N, Perez H, Moore HD, et al. CD133-enriched Xeno-free human embryonic-derived neural stem cells expand rapidly in culture and do not form teratomas in immunodeficient mice. Stem Cell Res. 2014;13:214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nasonkin IO, Koliatsos VE. Nonhuman sialic acid Neu5Gc is very low in human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursors differentiated with B27/N2 and noggin: implications for transplantation. Exp Neurol. 2006;201:525–529. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu L, Mahairaki V, Koliatsos VE. Host induction by transplanted neural stem cells in the spinal cord: further evidence for an adult spinal cord neurogenic niche. Regen Med. 2012;7:785–797. doi: 10.2217/rme.12.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xu LY, Shen PL, Hazel T, Johe K, Koliatsos VE. Dual transplantation of human neural stem cells into cervical and lumbar cord ameliorates motor neuron disease in SOD1 transgenic rats. Neurosci Lett. 2011;494:222–226. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yan J, Xu L, Welsh AM, Chen D, Hazel T, Johe K, et al. Combined immunosuppressive agents or CD4 antibodies prolong survival of human neural stem cell grafts and improve disease outcomes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis transgenic mice. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1976–1985. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Boyd A, Zhang H, Williams A. Insufficient OPC migration into demyelinated lesions is a cause of poor remyelination in MS and mouse models. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:841–859. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1112-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Koliatsos VE, Xu LY, Yan J. Human stem cell grafts as therapies for motor neuron disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8:137–141. doi: 10.1517/14712598.8.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hu BY, Weick JP, Yu J, Ma LX, Zhang XQ, Thomson JA, et al. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:4335–4340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910012107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nistor GI, Totoiu MO, Haque N, Carpenter MK, Keirstead HS. Human embryonic stem cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes in high purity and myelinate after spinal cord transplantation. Glia. 2005;49:385–396. doi: 10.1002/glia.20127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Keirstead HS, Nistor G, Bernal G, Totoiu M, Cloutier F, Sharp K, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25:4694–4705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0311-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sharp J, Frame J, Siegenthaler M, Nistor G, Keirstead HS. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants improve recovery after cervical spinal cord injury. Stem Cells. 2010;28:152–163. doi: 10.1002/stem.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cloutier F, Siegenthaler MM, Nistor G, Keirstead HS. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors into rat spinal cord injuries does not cause harm. Regen Med. 2006;1:469–479. doi: 10.2217/17460751.1.4.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hatch MN, Nistor G, Keirstead HS. Derivation of high-purity oligodendroglial progenitors. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;549:59–75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-931-4_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hatch MN, Schaumburg CS, Lane TE, Keirstead HS. Endogenous remyelination is induced by transplant rejection in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;212:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vigano F, Mobius W, Gotz M, Dimou L. Transplantation reveals regional differences in oligodendrocyte differentiation in the adult brain. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1370–1372. doi: 10.1038/nn.3503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sontag CJ, Uchida N, Cummings BJ, Anderson AJ. Injury to the spinal cord niche alters the engraftment dynamics of human neural stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;2:620–632. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Moreno-Manzano V, Rodriguez-Jimenez FJ, Garcia-Rosello M, Lainez S, Erceg S, Calvo MT, et al. Activated spinal cord ependymal stem cells rescue neurological function. Stem Cells. 2009;27:733–743. doi: 10.1002/stem.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yang H, Lu P, McKay HM, Bernot T, Keirstead H, Steward O, et al. Endogenous neurogenesis replaces oligodendrocytes and astrocytes after primate spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2157–2166. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4070-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sun L, Lee J, Fine HA. Neuronally expressed stem cell factor induces neural stem cell migration to areas of brain injury. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1364–1374. doi: 10.1172/JCI200420001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Robin AM, Zhang ZG, Wang L, Zhang RL, Katakowski M, Zhang L, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha mediates neural progenitor cell motility after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:125–134. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tripathi RB, McTigue DM. Chronically increased ciliary neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor-2 expression after spinal contusion in rats. J Comp Neurol. 2008;510:129–144. doi: 10.1002/cne.21787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vaquero J, Zurita M, De OS, Coca S, Morales C, Salas C. Expression of vascular permeability factor in craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:831–834. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.5.0831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chi L, Ke Y, Luo C, Li B, Gozal D, Kalyanaraman B, et al. Motor neuron degeneration promotes neural progenitor cell proliferation, migration, and neurogenesis in the spinal cords of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice. Stem Cells. 2006;24:34–43. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fricker RA, Carpenter MK, Winkler C, Greco C, Gates MA, Bjorklund A. Site-specific migration and neuronal differentiation of human neural progenitor cells after transplantation in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci. 1999;19:5990–6005. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05990.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Flax JD, Aurora S, Yang C, Simonin C, Wills AM, Billinghurst LL, et al. Engraftable human neural stem cells respond to developmental cues, replace neurons, and express foreign genes. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16:1033–1039. doi: 10.1038/3473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim SU. Human neural stem cells genetically modified for brain repair in neurological disorders. Neuropathology. 2004;24:159–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2004.00552.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Erlandsson A, Larsson J, Forsberg-Nilsson K. Stem cell factor is a chemoattractant and a survival factor for CNS stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 2004;301:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Widera D, Holtkamp W, Entschladen F, Niggemann B, Zanker K, Kaltschmidt B, et al. MCP-1 induces migration of adult neural stem cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004;83:381–387. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Imitola J, Raddassi K, Park KI, Mueller FJ, Nieto M, Teng YD, et al. Directed migration of neural stem cells to sites of CNS injury by the stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha/CXC chemokine receptor 4 pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:18117–18122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408258102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhang H, Vutskits L, Pepper MS, Kiss JZ. VEGF is a chemoattractant for FGF-2-stimulated neural progenitors. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:1375–1384. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200308040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tomassy GS, Berger DR, Chen HH, Kasthuri N, Hayworth KJ, Vercelli A, et al. Distinct profiles of myelin distribution along single axons of pyramidal neurons in the neocortex. Science. 2014;344:319–324. doi: 10.1126/science.1249766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tirotta E, Carbajal KS, Schaumburg CS, Whitman L, Lane TE. Cell replacement therapies to promote remyelination in a viral model of demyelination. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;224:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wang S, Bates J, Li X, Schanz S, Chandler-Militello D, Levine C, et al. Human iPSC-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cells can myelinate and rescue a mouse model of congenital hypomyelination. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:252–264. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Givogri MI, Galbiati F, Fasano S, Amadio S, Perani L, Superchi D, et al. Oligodendroglial progenitor cell therapy limits central neurological deficits in mice with metachromatic leukodystrophy. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3109–3119. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4366-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Windrem MS, Schanz SJ, Guo M, Tian GF, Washco V, Stanwood N, et al. Neonatal chimerization with human glial progenitor cells can both remyelinate and rescue the otherwise lethally hypomyelinated shiverer mouse. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:553–565. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Pluchino S, Quattrini A, Brambilla E, Gritti A, Salani G, Dina G, et al. Injection of adult neurospheres induces recovery in a chronic model of multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2003;422:688–694. doi: 10.1038/nature01552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shindo T, Matsumoto Y, Wang Q, Kawai N, Tamiya T, Nagao S. Differences in the neuronal stem cells survival, neuronal differentiation and neurological improvement after transplantation of neural stem cells between mild and severe experimental traumatic brain injury. J Med Invest. 2006;53:42–51. doi: 10.2152/jmi.53.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Clark RSB, Kochanek PM, Watkins SC, Chen MZ, Dixon CE, Seidberg NA, et al. Caspase-3 mediated neuronal death after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurochem. 2000;74:740–753. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.740740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Smith FM, Raghupathi R, MacKinnon MA, McIntosh TK, Saatman KE, Meaney DF, et al. TUNEL-positive staining of surface contusions after fatal head injury in man. Acta Neuropathol. 2000;100:537–545. doi: 10.1007/s004010000222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Povlishock JT, Katz DI. Update of neuropathology and neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2005;20:76–94. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200501000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Singleton RH, Povlishock JT. Identification and characterization of heterogeneous neuronal injury and death in regions of diffuse brain injury: evidence for multiple independent injury phenotypes. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3543–3553. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5048-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Greer JE, McGinn MJ, Povlishock JT. Diffuse traumatic axonal injury in the mouse induces atrophy, c-Jun activation, and axonal outgrowth in the axotomized neuronal population. J Neurosci. 2011;31:5089–5105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5103-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Iwanami A, Kaneko S, Nakamura M, Kanemura Y, Mori H, Kobayashi S, et al. Transplantation of human neural stem cells for spinal cord injury in primates. J Neurosci Res. 2005;80:182–190. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Neirinckx V, Cantinieaux D, Coste C, Rogister B, Franzen R, Wislet-Gendebien S. Concise review: Spinal cord injuries: how could adult mesenchymal and neural crest stem cells take up the challenge? Stem Cells. 2014;32:829–843. doi: 10.1002/stem.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Fujimoto Y, Abematsu M, Falk A, Tsujimura K, Sanosaka T, Juliandi B, et al. Treatment of a mouse model of spinal cord injury by transplantation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived long-term self-renewing neuroepithelial-like stem cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30:1163–1173. doi: 10.1002/stem.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Ogawa Y, Sawamoto K, Miyata T, Miyao S, Watanabe M, Nakamura M, et al. Transplantation of in vitro-expanded fetal neural progenitor cells results in neurogenesis and functional recovery after spinal cord contusion injury in adult rats. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69:925–933. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nori S, Okada Y, Yasuda A, Tsuji O, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Grafted human-induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived neurospheres promote motor functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:16825–16830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108077108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sun Y, Xu CC, Li J, Guan XY, Gao L, Ma LX, et al. Transplantation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells improves locomotion deficits in rats with spinal cord irradiation injury. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.NCT01772810. Safety study of human spinal cord-derived neural stem cell transplantation for the treatment of chronic SCI. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01772810?term=Neural+Stem+Cell%2C+spinal+cord+injury&rank=1. 2014.
- 99.NCT01321333. Study of human central nervous system stem cells (HuCNS-SC) in patients with thoracic spinal cord injury. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01321333?term=NCT01321333&rank=1. 2014.
- 100.Povlishock JT. Traumatically induced axonal injury - pathogenesis and pathobiological implications. Brain Pathol. 1992;2:1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Smith DH, Meaney DF, Shull WH. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2003;18:307–316. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200307000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.NCT01494480. The clinical trial on the use of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01494480?term=NCT01494480&rank=1. 2014.
- 103.NCT01217008. Safety study of GRNOPC1 in spinal cord injury. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01217008?term=NCT01217008&rank=1. 2014.
- 104.NCT01895439. Safety and efficacy study of autologus bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in multiple sclerosis. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01895439?term=NCT01895439&rank=1. 2014.
- 105.NCT02254863. UCB transplant of inherited metabolic diseases with administration of intrathecal UCB derived oligodendrocyte-like cells (DUOC-01). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02254863?term=NCT02254863&rank=1. 2014.
- 106.Brazzini A, Cantella R, De la Cruz A, Yupanqui J, Leon C, Jorquiera T, et al. Intraarterial autologous implantation of adult stem cells for patients with Parkinson disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:443–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hess DC, Sila CA, Furlan AJ, Wechsler LR, Switzer JA, Mays RW. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical evaluation of MultiStem for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:381–386. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Riley J, Glass J, Feldman EL, Polak M, Bordeau J, Federici T, Johe K, Boulis NM. Intraspinal stem cell transplantation in als: a phase i trial, cervical microinjection and final surgical safety outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:77–87. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]