Abstract
The inhibitory potency of an antisense oligonucleotide depends critically on its design and the accessibility of its target site. Here, we used an RNA interference-guided approach to select antisense oligonucleotide target sites in the coding region of the highly structured hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA genome. We modified the conventional design of an antisense oligonucleotide containing locked nucleic acid (LNA) residues at its termini (LNA/DNA gapmer) by inserting 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) residues into the central DNA region. Obtained compounds, designed with the aim to analyze the effects of 8-oxo-dG modifications on the antisense oligonucleotides, displayed a unique set of properties. Compared to conventional LNA/DNA gapmers, the melting temperatures of the duplexes formed by modified LNA/DNA gapmers and DNA or RNA targets were reduced by approximately 1.6-3.3°C per modification. Comparative transfection studies showed that small interfering RNA was the most potent HCV RNA replication inhibitor (effective concentration 50 (EC50): 0.13 nM), whereas isosequential standard and modified LNA/DNA gapmers were approximately 50-fold less efficient (EC50: 5.5 and 7.1 nM, respectively). However, the presence of 8-oxo-dG residues led to a more complete suppression of HCV replication in transfected cells. These modifications did not affect the efficiency of RNase H cleavage of antisense oligonucleotide:RNA duplexes but did alter specificity, triggering the appearance of multiple cleavage products. Moreover, the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues increased the stability of antisense oligonucleotides of different configurations in human serum.
Introduction
The application of complementary DNA or RNA molecules or their derivatives for the modulation biological functions of specific RNA(s) is referred to as antisense technology. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are the major class of antisense agents used for sequence-specific RNA knockdown [1], and they can also be used to modulate RNA synthesis, maturation and transport. Two different mechanisms account for the inhibitory properties of ASOs. The first mechanism is typically mediated by the steric inhibition of translation machinery operating on the targeted RNA. In general, this mechanism is not associated with the destruction of targeted molecules, and, accordingly, it is most effective for coding RNAs if the ASO target site overlaps with or is located upstream of the initiation codon [2]. The second mechanism relies on the ability of ribonuclease H (RNase H), a ubiquitous group of cellular enzymes, to cleave the RNA part of the heteroduplexes formed between DNA ASOs and targeted RNA [3,4]. This mechanism results in the degradation of the targeted RNA and is therefore effective regardless of the position of the ASO binding site [2].
The activity of ASOs depends on many factors, including the efficiency of cell entry, the stability of the complex formed with the targeted RNA and the resistance of the ASO to enzymatic degradation. The low potency of standard RNA and DNA ASOs results from their poor uptake and extremely short intracellular and serum half-lives. Sugar moiety and phosphate backbone modifications have been used to increase the resistance of ASOs to degradation. Some of these modifications also increase the binding efficiency of ASOs to their target sequences [5] and/or may be beneficial for cell entry. However, only phosphorothioate-s [6], boranophosphate- [7], oxepane- [8], cyclohexene- [9], and fluoro-arabino (FANA)-modified ASOs [10] have been reported to activate RNase H upon binding to targeted mRNA. In contrast, fully modified N3’,P5’-phosphoramidates [11], morpholinos [12], peptide nucleic acids (PNA) [13], tricyclo-DNA [14], 2’-O-methyl locked nucleic acids (LNA) and 2’-O-methoxyethyl RNAs [15] lack this property. To overcome this issue, co-polymers of 2’-O-methyl RNA [16], FANA [17], PNA or LNA [18–20] with DNA have been developed. ASOs containing LNA residues at their termini (hereafter, ASOs with several terminal LNA monomers and internal DNA residues are termed LNA/DNA gapmers) are more effective activators of RNase H-mediated cleavage than 2’-O-methyl RNA/DNA gapmers or all-DNA ASOs [19].
The nucleobase moiety represents an alternative option for ASO modification. Several heterocyclic base modifications in ASOs have been described (reviewed in [21]). However, only a few of those modifications have been analyzed for their ability to activate RNase H. Thus far, ASOs with modified nucleobases (such as 5-(N-aminohexyl)carbamoyl-2’-dU [22] and G-clamps [23]) have been found to be worse RNase H activators than non-modified DNA oligonucleotides. The majority of sugar moiety, phosphate backbone, and nucleobase modifications increase the melting temperature (Tm) of ASO duplexes with DNA and RNA [24,25]. Furthermore, ASOs containing both LNA bases and phosphorothioate modifications possess excellent serum stability and long in vivo half-lives, enabling their successful use in clinical trials [26].
The 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) residue contains a minimally modified nucleobase, which is naturally occurring and can result from oxidative DNA damage. In the context of ASO, 8-oxo-guanine forms 3- to 4-fold weaker bonds with complementary cytosine (compared to non-modified guanine) [27], which results in a decrease in the Tm of the ASO:DNA duplexes [28–30]. However, both 8-oxo-dG [31] and 5-hydroxy-2’-deoxycytidine (5-OH-dC) [32], another product of DNA oxidization, have not only major but also minor zwitterionic and ionic tautomeric isomers, respectively (Fig 1A). Interestingly, theoretical quantum chemical calculations performed on the minor tautomeric form of 8-oxo-dG and anion of 5-OH-dC suggest that they exhibit abnormally strong bonding with their respective normal nucleobases in an aqueous environment [33]. It is not known how these effects might contribute to the efficiency of ASOs containing such modified residues.
The in vivo delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids to target tissues and organs represents another important problem that has been only partly solved (reviewed [34]). In the absence of specific delivery vehicles, the main target of ASOs in both rodent [35] and non-human primate [36,37] models is liver. Targeting other organs, including kidney [35,37], heart, diaphragm, lung, fat, gastrocnemius and quadriceps, is less efficient [35]. Clinical trials have shown that miravirsen, an experimental ASO drug that targets the microRNA miR122, spontaneously enters the liver [26].
As ASOs have a clear potential for the treatment of liver-associated pathologies, we chose hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA as a target for modified ASOs. HCV is a major human pathogen that affects the lives of over one hundred million people. Its positive polarity RNA genome is >9000 nucleotides (nt) long and contains strong RNA secondary structures [38]. Thus far, only ASOs targeting the 350-nt region at the 5’-terminus of HCV RNA, which contains the internal ribosome entry site (IRES), are efficient inhibitors of viral replication [15,39–46]. Hence, HCV RNA represents an important but difficult target for ASOs, and it may enable the determination of the positive and negative impacts of ASO modifications.
Here, we demonstrate that the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues destabilizes not only ASO:DNA but also ASO:RNA duplexes. These modifications also slow down the formation of all-DNA ASO:RNA duplexes, but they have little effect on the formation of duplexes between an LNA/DNA gapmer ASO and its target RNA. Furthermore, the presence of 8-oxo-dG residues does not have a negative impact on the efficiency of RNase H-mediated cleavage of the RNA target. Simultaneously, this modification alters the specificity of RNase H cleavage and increases the stability of ASOs in human serum. RNA interference (RNAi)-guided target site selection was used to identify novel sites in the coding region of the HCV genome that could be efficiently targeted with small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and ASOs. The incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues into the DNA region of an LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotide that targets such sites led to the development of ASOs that exhibit this novel mechanism of antisense action.
Materials and Methods
Oligonucleotides and modified oligonucleotides
siRNAs targeting the coding region of the HCV genome were designed using an algorithm that was developed in-house and were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Validated controls, including non-targeting siRNAs (AM4611 or AM4635) and a combination of siRNAs against firefly luciferase (Luc) [47] (AM4629), were obtained from Life Technologies (USA). If not stated otherwise, the non-modified all-DNA oligonucleotides (hereafter designated as “D”), modified all-DNA oligonucleotides (designated as “DM”), LNA/DNA gapmers (designated as “LD”) and LNA/DNA gapmers with modified nucleobases (designated as “LDM”) were synthesized by Exiqon A/S (Denmark). All the obtained oligonucleotides were dissolved in sterile water, aliquoted and stored at -85°C.
The batches of modified oligonucleotides obtained from different commercial providers were of variable quality. Accordingly, they failed to produce consistent and reproducible results in biological assays. For these reasons, multi-step quality control and purification protocols were developed. The quality of each oligonucleotide batch was independently verified in-house by RP-HPLC analysis using an HPLC LC20-A Prominence system (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an SPD-M20A absorbance detector. A Phenomenex Luna 5 μm C18 100A column (250x4.6 mm, SecurityGuard C18 4x3 mm precolumn) was temperature-regulated at 45°C and operated at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The oligonucleotides were eluted using a methanol gradient in 0.02 M ammonium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 [48]. For chromatogram analysis, Shimadzu LCsolution software was used. For preparative purification, inorganic phosphate was removed from the RP-HPLC fractions by the IE-HPLC method using LiClO4 as the eluent. The fractions were precipitated and washed with acetone. Depending on the downstream application, the oligonucleotide preparations were re-precipitated using ethanol/ammonium acetate (pH 7.0) or ethanol/sodium acetate. The oligonucleotides used in the subsequent analyses contained only trace quantities of impurities.
Mass spectrometric analysis of oligonucleotides was performed as described previously [48] using a Bruker Daltonics Autoflex instrument. Briefly, the matrix solution consisted of 7.8 mg/ml 2,4,6-trihydroxyacetophenone and 12 mM diammonium citrate in acetonitrile/water (1:1). An aliquot of the concentrated chromatographic fraction (or original preparation of oligonucleotide) was mixed with the same volume of matrix solution. One microliter of the resultant mixture was deposited on the target and dried in the air. The samples were analyzed in negative ion mode with the linear configuration.
Melting curve analysis using Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Melting curve data were obtained using FRET as described in detail by You and coworkers [49]. Briefly, DNA or RNA oligonucleotides labeled with Cy3 or TYE563 at the 3’-end (hereafter designated as “target”) were purchased from DNA Technology (Denmark) or Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Complementary oligonucleotides (hereafter designated as “probes”) were labeled in-house with FITC at the 5’-end or purchased with a 5’ FAM label from Exiqon A/S (Denmark). Hybridization was quantified by FRET between the FITC and Cy3 labels or the FAM and TYE563 labels (detected as a decrease in FITC or FAM fluorescence) when they were brought in close proximity due to the formation of a duplex between the probe and its target. The target oligonucleotides were used at concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM, and the probe was always used at a concentration of 50 nM. The probe-target interactions were measured in a 384-well optical plate in a volume of 20 μl in buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) using an ABI7900HT Real-Time PCR instrument (Life Technologies, USA). The temperature was rapidly increased to 95°C, and the complexes were allowed to melt for 10 min. Then, the temperature was decreased to 5°C over 45 min, stabilized for 5 min and increased slowly (over 45 min) to 95°C. The Tm values were calculated from the obtained melting curves.
Preparation of ASO:RNA duplexes
An ssRNA with the sequence 5’-GGC UUU ACC GGC GAU UUC GAC UCA GUG AUC GAC UGC A-3’ (Exiqon A/S, Denmark) was labeled at the 5´ terminus using γ-33P ATP (Perkin Elmer, USA) and phage T4 polynucleotide kinase (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocols, purified, and dissolved in buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, and 20 mM KCl. The labeled RNA was mixed with partially complementary D4676, DM4676, LD4676, LDM4676 or MixLD4676 oligonucleotides (Table 1). The obtained mixtures were heated to 95°C and allowed to slowly cool to 35°C. The appropriate volume of 5x non-denaturing loading buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue and 0.1% xylene cyanol was added to the samples, after which ASO:RNA duplexes were purified and quantified as described previously [50].
Table 1. Sequences of DNA and LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides.
Compound | Sequence (5’->3’) and modifications |
---|---|
D4676 | NH2-ATC ACT GAG TCG AAA TCG CCG |
D4676inv | NH2-GCC GCT AAA GCT GAG TCA CTA |
LD4676 | NH2-+A+T+C +A+CT GAG TCG AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
LD4676inv | NH2-+G+C+C +G+CT AAA GCT GAG T+C+A +C+T+A |
DM4676 | NH2-ATC ACT YAY TCY AAA TCG CCG |
LDM3570 | NH2-+A+T+G +A+TA GAX AGT XXA A+C+A +C+A+C |
LDM3570inv | NH2-+C+A+C +A+CA AXX TGA XAG AT+A +G+T+A |
LDM4676 | NH2-+A+T+C +A+CT YAY TCY AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
LDM4676inv | NH2-+G+C+C +G+CT AAA YCT YAY T+C+A +C+T+A |
MixLD4676 | NH2-+AT+C AC+T GAG +TCG +AAA +TC+G C+C+G |
NH2 = 5’ amino modifier C6. This group was present only in the oligonucleotides used for melting curve determination and for the analysis of delivery into cells. + = prefix for LNA; X = 5-OH-dC; Y = 8-oxo-dG.
To analyze the spontaneous formation of duplexes between target ssRNA and ASOs, 5 fmol of 33P-labeled ssRNA was mixed with 50 fmol of D4676, DM4676, LD4676 or LDM4676 (Table 1) in buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, and 20 mM KCl [50]. Samples were collected immediately (0 time point) or after incubation for 0.5, 1, 2, 4 or 8 h at 37°C. The appropriate volume of 5x non-denaturing loading buffer was added, and the samples were analyzed by PAGE in 15% native gels. The gels were dried, exposed to a storage phosphor screen and visualized using a Typhoon Trio scanner (GE Healthcare, UK).
In vitro RNase H assay
Target RNA (designated as FR3131), consisting of 269 nt from the 5’ end of the HCV genome and the region spanning positions 3081 to 5943, was synthesized in vitro using an mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Transcription Kit (Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNase H assays were performed as described by Kurreck and co-authors [19]. Briefly, the reaction mixture contained 1x RNase H buffer, 0.5 U of bacterial RNase H (Thermo Scientific, USA), 5 pmol of ASO and 500 ng of FR3131 RNA. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 0, 1, 5, 10, 20 or 60 min. At each time point, a 10 μl aliquot was collected. The reaction was stopped by adding 10 μl of 2x stop buffer (50 mM EDTA and 1% SDS) and subsequent heating to 95°C for 2 min. The reaction products were separated on a 0.8% TAE agarose gel and detected with ethidium bromide staining.
The kinetics of ASO:RNA duplex cleavage were analyzed using pre-formed ASO:RNA duplexes. Briefly, 1 fmol of the labeled duplexes was mixed with 0.05 U of RNase H in 1x RNase H buffer, and the reaction was performed at 37°C. Aliquots were collected immediately after mixing the substrate and enzyme (0 time point) or after incubation for 10 s or 0.5, 1, 5, 10 or 20 min. The reactions were stopped by adding an equal volume of 2x stop buffer. The samples were then heated to 95°C for 2 min, cooled rapidly on ice and separated by PAGE in native 15% gels. The gels were dried, exposed to a storage phosphor screen and visualized using a Typhoon Trio scanner (GE Healthcare, UK). Quantitative analyses were performed using ImageQuant TL Software (GE Healthcare, UK).
Analysis of the stability of ASOs in human serum
To analyze the stability of D4676, DM4676, LD4676, and LDM4676 (Table 1) in human serum, these compounds were labeled with 33P as described above for RNA oligonucleotides. Five fmol of each 33P-labeled ASO was incubated in human serum (Human Serum, Off the clot, Type AB; PAA, Germany) at 37°C. Aliquots were collected immediately after preparation of the mixtures (0 time point) or after incubation for 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 or 6 h. Next, 2x stop solution was added to each aliquot. The full-length oligonucleotides and their degradation products were separated and analyzed as described above. The average half-lives of each type of ASO were obtained from three independent experiments by fitting the obtained values to an exponential decay function.
HCV replicon cells
Huh-luc/neo-ET cells, which harbor the I389/NS3-3’/LucUbiNeo-ET replicon of HCV genotype 1b (Con1 isolate) (Fig 2A), and replicon-free Huh7-cure cells were obtained from ReBlikon GmbH (Germany). The cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, 0.5 mg/ml G418, 10% fetal calf serum and 2 mM L-glutamine (GE Healthcare, UK).
A variant replicon that encodes for NS3 with Thr54Ala mutation, was constructed using site-directed mutagenesis and designated I389/NS3-3’/LucUbiNeo-ET-T54A. The corresponding cell line, designated Huh-luc/neo-ET-3570mut, was obtained by electroporation [51] of Huh7-cure cells with the corresponding in vitro-transcribed RNAs and selection of antibiotic-resistant colonies in the presence of 0.5 mg/ml G418 (Invivogen, USA). The preservation of the introduced mutation was verified as follows. Total RNA was extracted from Huh-luc/neo-ET-3570mut cell line using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was carried out using a First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific). HCV-specific cDNA fragment containing the mutation site was PCR-amplified using of primers flanking the mutated region. Obtained PCR products were purified and sequenced using Sanger sequencing.
Transfection of cells with siRNAs or ASOs
For RNAi-guided screening, Huh-luc/neo-ET cells were reverse-transfected with siRNAs (100 nM each) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Life Technologies, USA). Luc activity was measured 48 h post-transfection (p.t.) using reagents and protocols from Promega (USA). The total protein content in the cell lysates was measured by Bradford micro-assay (Bio-Rad, USA).
Lipofectamine 2000, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX, Lipofectamine LTX (Life Technologies, USA), DOTAP, FuGENE HD (Roche, Switzerland) and TurboFect (Thermo Scientific, USA) reagents were used to optimize the transfection of Huh-luc/neo-ET cells. Various amounts of these reagents and forward- or reverse-transfection protocols were used to deliver ASOs (Table 1) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 into the cells. The transfection efficiencies were analyzed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA). Cytotoxic effects (or lack thereof) were observed using a Nikon Eclipse confocal microscope (Nikon, Japan).
Quantitation of the inhibitory effects of ASOs
Cells were collected and lysed at selected time points. The total protein content in the lysate and Luc activity were measured. For the normalization of HCV replication, which is proportional to Luc activity, the following calculations were performed. First, to enable the comparison of the average Luc activity per living cell, the total protein content of the cells was used to normalize the Luc activity as previously reported [51]. Thus, the HCV replication signal was expressed as relative light units per microgram of protein (RLU/μg protein). Second, the obtained normalized Luc values were divided by those obtained for the negative controls: “-” siRNA- or mock-transfected cells. The averages and standard deviations of seven independent experiments were obtained. Subsequently, the dimensionless average values were fitted with a four-parameter dose-response equation (variable slope model) using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to estimate the effective concentration 50 (EC50) values.
Results
Thermal stability of the all-DNA ASO:RNA duplex is reduced upon incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues
8-oxo-dG residues have been reported to destabilize ASO:DNA duplexes [27,29,30]. However, ASOs are generally used to target RNA rather than DNA molecules. To analyze the effects of 8-oxo-dG residues on the binding of ASOs to DNA and RNA molecules, a set of all-DNA oligonucleotides was prepared in which none, one, or two of the centrally located dG residues were substituted with 8-oxo-dG residues. For comparison, a set of ASOs containing 5-OH-dC residues was prepared because of the similarity to 8-oxo-dG; the 5-OH-dC minor tautomeric form (Fig 1A) was predicted to have abnormally strong bonding to dG residues [33]. Nevertheless, the introduction of 5-OH-dC residues simultaneously into ASO and target DNA also results in decreased ASO:DNA duplex stability [28]. All the oligonucleotides were 21 nt long and had identical sequences (Table 2). Duplex formation between these oligonucleotides and their targets was monitored by FRET. In this setup, any difference in the Tm of the formed duplexes is attributable to the presence of the 8-oxo-dG or 5-OH-dC modifications.
Table 2. Sequences of oligonucleotides used to determine the melting temperatures by FRET.
Compound | Sequence (5’->3’) and modifications |
---|---|
Target RNA-Cy3 | GAU UCU GAU GAC UCA UUU CUU-Cy3 |
Target DNA-Cy3 | GAT TCT GAT GAC TCA TTT CTT-Cy3 |
FITC-C | FITC-AAG AAA TGA GTC ATC AGA ATC |
FITC-X | FITC-AAG AAA TGA GTX ATC AGA ATC |
FITC-XX | FITC-AAG AAA TGA GTX ATX AGA ATC |
FITC-Y | FITC-AAG AAA TYA GTC ATC AGA ATC |
FITC-YY | FITC-AAG AAA TYA YTC ATC AGA ATC |
Target RNA-TYE563 | CGG CGA UUU CGA CUC AGU GAU-TYE563 |
Target DNA-TYE563 | CGG CGA TTT CGA CTC AGT GAT-TYE563 |
FAM-D4676 | FAM-ATC ACT GAG TCG AAA TCG CCG |
FAM-LD4676 | FAM-+A+T+C +A+CT GAG TCG AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
FAM-LDM4676 | FAM-+A+T+C +A+CT YAY TCY AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
NH2 = 5’ amino modifier C6; + = prefix for LNA; X = 5-OH-dC; Y = 8-oxo-dG.
When the 8-oxo-dG modification (FITC-Y) was introduced, the Tm values of both the ASO:DNA and ASO:RNA duplexes were reduced by ~1.6–1.8°C compared to those of the duplexes formed by control oligonucleotides. Increasing the number of 8-oxo-dG modifications (FITC-YY) resulted in further reduction of the Tm by ~1.6°C for ASO:DNA and by ~2.5°C for ASO:RNA duplexes. Thus, destabilization resulting from the insertion of 8-oxo-dG modifications occurs not only for ASO:DNA duplexes (Fig 1B) but also for ASO:RNA duplexes (Fig 1C). In contrast, duplexes formed by oligonucleotides with one or two 5-OH-dC residues had nearly the same Tm as duplexes formed by unmodified control oligonucleotides (Fig 1B and 1C). Thus, the introduction of the 5-OH-dC modification into an ASO alone had virtually no effect on the stability of duplexes formed with DNA or RNA.
RNAi-guided selection reveals potential ASO target sites in the coding region of HCV RNA
Known targets for ASOs are located in a 350-nt region at the 5’-terminus of HCV RNA. Clearly, targeting a region that comprises less than four percent of the virus genome is a bottleneck that hinders the development of the most efficient ASOs. RNAi technology was used to search for highly accessible target sites in the HCV coding region. Twenty-eight different siRNAs targeting the HCV genome were designed (Table 3). Each siRNA had a 19-nt duplex region with 2-nt 3’-overhangs [52]. In addition, four siRNAs (3564, 7749, 7805, and 7983) that were previously reported to efficiently inhibit HCV replication [53,54] were used for comparison. Non-targeting siRNAs (AM4611 or AM4635) and a combination of siRNAs against a sequence encoding Luc marker (AM4629) [47] were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Table 3. Sequences of oligonucleotides in siRNA duplexes.
Position a | Antisense strand (5'->3') | Sense siRNA strand (5'->3') |
---|---|---|
3457 | UAG UGA UGA UGC AGC CAA GUA | C UUG GCU GCA UCA UCA CUA GC |
3564 | GAC AGU CCA ACA CAC GCC AUU | U GGC GUG UGU UGG ACU GUC UA |
3570 | AUG AUA GAC AGU CCA ACA CAC | G UGU UGG ACU GUC UAU CAU GG |
4167 | UAC CCC GGU UCU GAU GUU AGG | U AAC AUC AGA ACC GGG GUA AG |
4676 | AUC ACU GAG UCG AAA UCG CCG | G CGA UUU CGA CUC AGU GAU CG |
4814 | AUG CCC AUC CUG CCC CUA CCA | G UAG GGG CAG GAU GGG CAU UU |
5066 | UUG UCU CCU GCC UGC UUA GUC | C UAA GCA GGC AGG AGA CAA CU |
5378 | AUC CUG CCC ACA AUG ACC ACG | U GGU CAU UGU GGG CAG GAU CA |
5518 | UUG CCU UCU GUU UGA AUU GUU | C AAU UCA AAC AGA AGG CAA UC |
5622 | AUU CCA CAU AUG CUU CGC CCA | G GCG AAG CAU AUG UGG AAU UU |
5939 | AUC UCG CCG CUC AUG ACC UUA | A GGU CAU GAG CGG CGA GAU GC |
5978 | AUA GCA GGG AGU AGG UUA ACC | U UAA CCU ACU CCC UGC UAU CC |
6274 | AUA UCC AAU CCC AAA CAU CUC | G AUG UUU GGG AUU GGA UAU GC |
6365 | UAC CCA CGU UGA CAU GAG AAG | U CUC AUG UCA ACG UGG GUA CA |
6590 | UAC UCC UCA GCA GCC ACC CGC | G GGU GGC UGC UGA GGA GUA CG |
7043 | AUG UUC CCG CCC AUC UCC UGC | A GGA GAU GGG CGG GAA CAU CA |
7125 | UAC UUC CCU CUC AUC CUC CUC | G GAG GAU GAG AGG GAA GUA UC |
7512 | AUC CCC CGG CUC CCC CUC AAG | U GAG GGG GAG CCG GGG GAU CC |
7699 | UUG UAG CAU AGA CCA AGU UGU | A ACU UGG UCU AUG CUA CAA CA |
7749 | CAG UCU GUC AAA GGU GAC CUU | G GUC ACC UUU GAC AGA CUG CA |
7790 | AUC UCC UUG AGC ACG UCC CGG | G GGA CGU GCU CAA GGA GAU GA |
7805 | GAC GCC UUC GCC UUC AUC UCC | A GAU GAA GGC GAA GGC GUC CA |
7983 | GUC AAU UGG UGU CUC AGU GUC | C ACU GAG ACA CCA AUU GAC AC |
8155 | AUC CGU AUG AAG AGC CCA UCA | A UGG GCU CUU CAU ACG GAU UC |
8161 | AUU GGA AUC CGU AUG AAG AGC | U CUU CAU ACG GAU UCC AAU AC |
8468 | AAG UAA CAU GUG AGG GUA UUA | A UAC CCU CAC AUG UUA CUU GA |
8657 | AAG UCG UAU UCU GGU UUG GGC | C CAA ACC AGA AUA CGA CUU GG |
8674 | AUG AUG UUA UCA ACU CCA AGU | U UGG AGU UGA UAA CAU CAU GC |
8685 | AUU GGA GGA GCA UGA UGU UAU | A ACA UCA UGC UCC UCC AAU GU |
8819 | AUG AUG AUG UUG CCU AGC CAG | G GCU AGG CAA CAU CAU CAU GU |
8873 | AUG GAG AAG AAA UGA GUC AUC | U GAC UCA UUU CUU CUC CAU CC |
9336 | AUA GAU GCC UAC CCC UAC AGA | U GUA GGG GUA GGC AUC UAU CU |
a Position refers to the terminal 3’-end nucleotide position of the siRNA antisense strand in the HCV Con1 genome (GenBank accession number: AJ238799).
The level of Luc activity in Huh-luc/neo-ET cells is directly proportional to the copy number and replication efficiency of the HCV subgenomic replicon, making it an efficient tool for analyzing the anti-HCV efficiencies of the obtained siRNAs [55,56]. At a concentration of 100 nM, the majority of the designed HCV-specific siRNAs induced less of an effect that the positive controls (Fig 2B). Moreover, similarly to the negative control siRNA, several siRNAs (4167, 7512, 8685, and 9336) did not have any effect on HCV replication. The effects of three siRNAs (4814, 7790 and 8161) were comparable to those of the positive controls (70- to 100-fold inhibition), and two siRNAs (3570 and 4676) were more potent (approximately 300-fold inhibition).
As the high inhibitory potential of an siRNA indicates the accessibility of the corresponding target sites, it was concluded that RNAi-guided screening enabled the selection of several potential ASO target sites in the HCV coding region. However, an all-DNA ASO based on the sequence of the guide strand of siRNA 4676 was essentially unable to suppress HCV replication. Therefore, HCV-specific 21-mer LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides that contained five LNA monomers at each end and three modified residues in the DNA region were designed (Tables 1 and 2). As the target site of siRNA 4676 contained three C-residues in its central region, it was targeted by ASOs containing three 8-oxo-dG nucleotides. In contrast, the target site for siRNA 3570 contained three G-residues, and hence, a control ASO was generated that contained three 5-OH-dC residues (Table 1).
Inhibitory efficiency of modified ASOs is reduced by point mutation in the target site
The inhibitory effects of siRNAs and, to lesser extent, ASOs are reduced by point mutations in their target sites. Mutations at distant sites (unless they modify the higher-order structure of the target region) have no such effect. The only mutation in the selected target sites, for which the viability of the mutant replicon has been previously demonstrated, is located in the target site of siRNA 3570 and results in a Thr54→Ala change in NS3 [57]. Therefore, this mutation was introduced into the HCV replicon that was used to generate a Huh-luc/neo-ET-3570mut cell line (Fig 3A). As the central region of the target site of siRNA 3570 contains only two C-residues, an ASO similar to LDM4676 (which contains three 8-oxo-dG residues; Table 1) could not be designed against this site. Therefore, a control LNA/DNA gapmer containing three 5-OH-dC residues (LDM3570; Fig 3A) was used instead. Oligonucleotides with inverted sequences (LDM4676inv and LDM3570inv; Table 1) were used as controls.
Huh-luc/neo-ET and Huh-luc/neo-ET-3570mut cells were transfected with different concentrations of siRNA 3570, siRNA 4676, LDM4676, LDM4676inv, LDM3570 and LDM3570inv. A point mutation in HCV RNA that changes the classical A:U base pair in the siRNA guide-strand:target-RNA duplex to the G:U wobble base pair resulted in a marked (10-fold) decrease in the inhibitory efficiency of siRNA 3570 (Fig 3B). As expected, this mutation did not alter the inhibitory efficiency of siRNA 4676 or LDM4676. Transfecting cells with different amounts of LDM4676inv resulted in increased HCV replication regardless of the presence or absence of the mutation in the siRNA 3570 target site (Fig 3C). In contrast to LDM4676, the inhibitory activity of LDM3570 was clearly reduced by the mutation (Fig 3B). At concentrations up to 62.5 nM, the control oligonucleotide LDM3570inv was unable to suppress HCV replication, and its effects (if any) were not diminished by the mutation in the siRNA 3570 target site (Fig 3B). Therefore it can be concluded that at these concentrations the potency of LDM3570 was indeed specifically reduced by mutation of its target site. These findings are consistent with the antisense mechanism of action of modified oligonucleotides; furthermore, the data indicate that the observed suppression of HCV replication was not caused by side effects of the ASOs. However, at concentrations 125 or 250 nM, LDM3570inv exhibited toxicity and inhibited HCV replication (Fig 3B).
Incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues into LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides has no negative impact on their antisense potency
At the highest concentrations, LDM4676 and LDM3570 visibly damaged the transfected cells. Although these ASOs lack the nucleotide sequence descriptors (TCC and TGC motifs) characteristic of hepatotoxic LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides [58], cytotoxicity may result from additional factors and their combinations. These factors include the transfection protocol, the presence of modified nucleobases and the cytotoxicity of the transfection reagent. As cytotoxicity represents an obstacle for more detailed studies, more suitable transfection methods were sought. Huh7 cells and their derivatives were difficult to transfect with DNA or LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides without causing cell damage. Therefore, the results obtained using different amounts of six transfection reagents (see Materials and Methods) and reverse- or direct-transfection protocols were compared. Based on the results of this comparison, an optimized Lipofectamine 2000-mediated reverse-transfection protocol was selected that enabled the delivery of siRNA and ASOs into 70–75% of the cells. Further increases in transfection efficiency required higher amounts of transfection reagent, which resulted in decreased viability of transfected cells. Thus, in subsequent experiments, the reduction of HCV replication to 25–30% of its original level roughly corresponded to complete suppression of HCV replication in every siRNA- or ASO-transfected cell. Even using the selected protocol, higher concentrations of LD4676, LDM4676 and LDM4676inv exhibited some cytotoxicity, as determined by measuring the total protein content in the lysates of transfected cells (Fig 4B–4D). Cell viability measurements using the xCELLigence system (ACEA Biosciences, USA) revealed the same trend. Therefore, as in all previous experiments (Figs 2B, 3B and 3C), the replication signal (Luc activity) was normalized to the total protein content of the cell lysate (essentially, to the number of living cells). The quantitative evaluation by four-parameter dose-response curve fitting (variable slope model) of such values obtained in seven independent experiments is shown in Fig 4A, and the obtained EC50 values for different ASOs are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. EC50, CI and R2 values for LD4676, LDM4676, and siRNA 4676 estimated from seven independent experiments.
ON/siRNA | EC50 (nM) | CI (nM) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|
D4676 | ND | ND | ND |
LD4676 | 5.5 | 0.9–32.9 | 0.77 |
LDM4676 | 7.1 | 4.0–12.5 | 0.87 |
siRNA 4676 | 0.13 | 0.03–0.5 | 0.95 |
CI = 95% confidence interval; R2 = goodness of a four-parametric nonlinear regression curve fit; ND = not determined.
The obtained data revealed that D4676 did not considerably reduce HCV RNA replication, confirming a previous observation that the all-DNA ASOs are not efficient inhibitors. siRNA 4676 had an EC50 of 0.13 nM, whereas the EC50 values for LD4676 and LDM4676 were approximately 50-fold higher (Table 4). Interestingly, despite the roughly equal mean EC50 values of LD4676 and LDM4676, the shape of the LD4676 inhibitory curve at higher concentrations was linear rather than non-linear, which was also evident by the goodness of fit with the variable slope non-linear regression curve (Table 4). Consequently, at the highest concentrations, LDM4676 inhibited the HCV replication signal to a approximately 27% residual level. As approximately 25% inhibition was achieved with siRNA 4676 (Fig 4A), which is capable of nearly completely inhibiting HCV replication in positively transfected cells (Fig 2B), it was calculated that 100 nM LDM4676 suppressed HCV replication by at least 95% in ASO-transfected cells. In contrast, the residual HCV replication level in the presence of the highest concentration of LD4676 was 42% (Fig 4A), indicating that HCV replication in ASO-transfected cells was inhibited by no more than 80%. To confirm that the observed inhibitory effects (Fig 4A) were sequence-specific, control oligonucleotides with inverted sequences (Table 1) were transfected into Huh-luc/neo-ET cells. Importantly, despite an observation of mild cytotoxicity at the highest concentrations, none of the control oligonucleotides inhibited HCV replication (Fig 4C and 4D); these data indicated that the observed effects of the ASOs targeting the siRNA 4676 site were sequence-specific. These results also demonstrated that under certain conditions, LDM4676 might be a more efficient inhibitor of HCV RNA replication than LD4676. However, in general, the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues did not result in significant gains in antisense potency in a cell-based HCV replication assay.
8-oxo-dG residues reduce the Tm of the LNA/DNA gapmer ASO:RNA duplex but have little effect on duplex formation
The Tm values of the LDM4676:DNA and LDM4676:RNA duplexes were determined and compared to the Tm values of duplexes composed of non-modified all-DNA ASO (D4676) or LNA/DNA gapmer ASO (LD4676) (Table 1).
Numerous studies have shown that the incorporation of LNA residues strongly increases the binding of ASOs to their targets [20,59]. Consistent with this, the melting temperature of the LD4676:DNA duplex was 20°C higher than the Tm of the D4676:DNA duplex (Fig 5A). The effect of LNA residues on the Tm of the ASO:RNA duplex was even more prominent: the Tm increase was greater than 30°C at all analyzed target RNA concentrations (Fig 5B). Consistent with the results obtained for all-DNA ASOs (Fig 1B, 1C), the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues reduced the Tm of duplexes of LNA:DNA gapmer ASOs with both DNA (Fig 5A) and RNA (Fig 5B) targets. For both targets, the decrease in Tm (LDM4676 versus LD4676) was between 5 and 10°C (Fig 5A and 5B).
To investigate how the reduced Tm affects the efficiency of ASO:RNA duplex formation, a 37-nt ssRNA that contains the target site of siRNA 4676 (Fig 5C) was labeled with 33P and incubated with D4676, DM4676, LD4676 or LDM4676 (Table 1) at physiological temperature (37°C). ASO:RNA duplexes were detected immediately after the mixing of the ssRNA target and ASO (Fig 5C). The 8-oxo-dG residues in all-DNA ASOs clearly reduced the efficiency of duplex formation. This effect was likely due to the reduced Tm of DM4676. The LNA/DNA gapmer ASO formed duplexes at least as efficiently as non-modified all-DNA ASO. Interestingly, 8-oxo-dG residues did not inhibit LNA/DNA gapmer ASO:RNA duplex formation (Fig 5C), most likely because the Tm of the LDM4676:RNA duplex remained sufficiently high to ensure its effective formation.
8-oxo-dG residues have no adverse effects on RNase H-mediated cleavage of ASO:RNA duplexes
LD4676 and LDM4676 formed duplexes with target RNA with similar efficiencies (Fig 5C), and the duplexes formed by LD4676 were more stable (Fig 5B). Nevertheless, in a cell-based assay, LDM4676 was a somewhat more efficient inhibitor of HCV replication (Fig 4A). Therefore, we asked whether there were any differences in the ability of these duplexes to undergo RNase H-mediated target RNA cleavage. As human RNase H enzymes are not commercially available, we used bacterial RNase H, which has very similar fold and active center organization [60] and shares many enzymatic properties with human RNase H enzymes [61,62].
Pre-formed ASO:RNA duplexes, consisting of D4676, DM4676, LD4676, LDM4676 or an LNA/DNA mixomer oligonucleotide designated MixLD4676 (Table 1), and 33P-labeled 37-nt target RNA molecules were used to estimate the kinetics of RNase H-mediated cleavage (Fig 6A). As expected, RNase H had no effect on ssRNA (Fig 6B and 6C). Similarly, due to the absence of the obligatory 6-bp DNA:RNA duplex stretch required for RNase H activation [19,62], RNase H could not cleave the RNA strand in the MixLD4676:RNA duplex (Fig 6B and 6C). In contrast, D4676:RNA and DM4676:RNA duplexes were rapidly cleaved. However, after 0.5 min, the reaction plateaued, leaving 20–30% of the substrate uncleaved. The cleavage of duplexes containing LD4676 or LDM4676 initially followed similar kinetics, but cleaved products continued to accumulate for 5 more min, reducing the levels of intact substrates to 10% of the initial amount (Fig 6B and 6C). As no significant differences in the cleavage of duplexes formed by D4676 and LD4676 and their respective modified ASOs were observed (Fig 6C), it was concluded that the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG into the ASO had no effect on the overall efficiency of RNase H-mediated cleavage of pre-formed ASO:RNA duplexes.
8-oxo-dG modifications alter the specificity of ASO-mediated RNase H cleavage of target RNA
Upon closer examination of the RNase H cleavage assay results, we noticed that the pattern of cleavage products generated by ASOs with and without 8-oxo-dG modification dramatically differed. In particular, a single major cleavage product was clearly dominant for the LD4676:RNA duplex, whereas for the LDM4676:RNA duplex, at least two major cleavage products of roughly the same abundance were observed (Fig 6B). A similar effect, although less pronounced, was observed for duplexes containing the all-DNA oligonucleotides D4676 and DM4676. Thus, the presence of 8-oxo-dG residues in ASOs triggered multiple cleavages by RNase H in the targeted DNA:RNA duplex region.
Efficiency of RNase H-mediated cleavage of target RNA molecules correlates with the efficiency of ASO:RNA duplex formation
Next, we studied the effect of 8-oxo-dG residues on ASO:target RNA duplex formation and subsequent cleavage by RNase H in a single reaction. To account for the possible influence of RNA secondary structure, full-length HCV replicon RNA was used as a target. However, this RNA underwent slow degradation in the absence of ASOs. Therefore, FR3131, an in vitro-synthesized 3131-nt fragment of HCV replicon RNA, was used as a target. This target RNA was pre-incubated with D4676, DM4676, LD4676 or LDM4676 for 10 min at 37°C; next, RNase H was added to the reaction mixture. In the absence of ASO, FR3131 RNA remained stable (Fig 6D). In the presence of D4676, the targeted RNA was cleaved into two fragments of the expected sizes (Fig 6D). 8-oxo-dG residues clearly reduced the cleavage efficiency in the presence of all-DNA ASOs (Fig 6D). As the modification had a similar effect on ASO:RNA duplex formation (Fig 5C) but did not affect the degradation of pre-formed ASO:RNA duplexes (Fig 6B and 6C), it was concluded that the rate-limiting step for RNase H-mediated target RNA cleavage was ASO:RNA duplex formation. In the presence of LNA/DNA gapmer ASOs, nearly complete cleavage of FR3131 RNA occurred (Fig 6D). This result is consistent with the more complete degradation of pre-formed LNA/DNA gapmer ASO:RNA duplexes (Fig 6C). In the context of LNA/DNA gapmers, 8-oxo-dG residues had little, if any, effect on RNase H-mediated cleavage of target RNA (Fig 6D). Due to the large sizes of the FR3131 cleavage products (approximately 1250- and 1850-nt), the effect of 8-oxo-dG residues on the precise cleavage positions within the ASO:RNA duplex could not be observed in this experiment.
Incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues increases the stability of oligonucleotides in human serum
Another factor that affects the potency of ASOs is their stability in biological environments. To determine whether 8-oxo-dG residues affected the stability of all-DNA and LNA/RNA gapmer ASOs, 33P-labeled D4676, DM4676, LD4676 and LDM4676 were incubated in human serum for 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h. Consistent with previous data [19], the LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides were much more stable than their all-DNA counterparts (Fig 7A and 7B). The half-life of D4676 was less than 8 min, whereas the half-life of LD4676 was more than 10 times longer. Importantly, the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues significantly increased the stability of both types of oligonucleotides (Fig 7B). The half-life of DM4676 (15 min) was nearly twice of that of D4676. Similarly, 8-oxo-dG modification increased the half-life of the LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotide from 90 min to 130 min. The mechanism(s) responsible for this stabilization are outside of the scope of current study and remain unknown.
Discussion
The difficulties hampering the clinical use of ASO drugs include their low efficiency, low bioavailability, rapid degradation and unwanted side effects (typically off-target effects). Thus, synthetic ASOs often contain one or more modifications aimed at improving the properties of the compound. The common theme in ASO design is to achieve increased ASO:target duplex stability [5], which is typically associated with higher ASO potency [63]. However, ASOs with a very high Tm also tend to bind to secondary targets, and their ability to trigger RNase H-mediated target RNA degradation may be reduced or even completely abolished [25]. Consequently, such ASOs are generally highly efficient only if they target short microRNAs or if their binding site overlaps with the region directly involved in translation initiation. This limitation drastically reduces the number of suitable ASO binding sites in mRNA molecules. Here, we provide a novel platform for ASO target site selection and show that the destabilization of the ASO:target-RNA duplex by the introduction of 8-oxo-dG modifications has several advantages over conventional LNA/DNA gapmer ASO design.
The initial idea of using 8-oxo-dG residues was based on theoretical quantum calculations. It was hypothesized that the antisense activity of oligonucleotides containing 8-oxo-dG may be increased due to the ability of corresponding nucleobases to acquire tautomeric forms, which enables enhanced binding to complementary normal nucleobases [33]. However, experimental data revealed that the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues reduced the Tm of ASO:DNA and ASO:RNA duplexes (Figs 1, 5A and 5B), probably because the major tautomer of 8-oxo-dG in aqueous solution is the 6,8-diketo form [64], which binds to complementary dC residues more weakly than does the standard dG residue [29]. Thus, the contribution of the strongly binding minor zwitterionic tautomer of 8-oxo-dG (Fig 1A) may be too small to be detected. The overall oligonucleotide Tm analysis, however, did not exclude the possibility that different tautomeric forms of 8-oxo-dG might play an important role in base pairing.
The efficiency of ASOs critically depends on the physical accessibility of its target site. Very limited information is available about the actual topological structures of mRNA in cells, where they form RNA-protein complexes. In this study, the attempts to target sequences with specific nucleotide compositions or regions lacking predicted secondary structures (calculated using the Minimal Free-Energy method) were unsuccessful. High-throughput selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) has been used to resolve the secondary structure of the HIV-1 RNA genome [65]. However, for HCV, only the structures of short non-coding terminal fragments of the genome have been analyzed using SHAPE [66–68]. Furthermore, some viral RNAs exist in different conformations, and corresponding changes are integral to the regulation of the viral infection cycle [69,70]. Hence, there is the need for empirical screening of targeted RNA.
The low efficiency of all-DNA ASOs (Fig 4A) hinders their use as screening tools. Therefore, we reasoned that siRNAs, which can be highly efficient and are relatively inexpensive, might represent suitable tools for performing such screening. This approach led to the identification of two potent siRNAs that were 3-fold more efficient than positive control siRNAs targeting the non-structured reporter part of the replicon RNA construct (Fig 2). Therefore, we hypothesized that the ability of these siRNAs to suppress HCV replication would serve as a good indication that the corresponding regions of the HCV RNA genome are accessible not only to the cellular RNA silencing machinery but also to ASOs. An additional benefit of this approach is that it allows the direct comparison of the effects of ASOs and siRNAs targeting the same sequences. It would be interesting to compare the siRNA mapping data with the SHAPE-based structures of corresponding RNAs. If there is a correlation between the observed efficiencies of siRNAs and the determined high-order structures of mRNAs (or a viral RNA genomes), siRNAs might become useful tools for probing the high-order structure of RNAs inside the cell.
Experiments with an in vitro-synthesized fragment of HCV RNA (Fig 6D) and with the HCV replicon cell line (Fig 3) confirmed that modified LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides use an antisense mode of action. Although the insertion of three 8-oxo-dG residues into the LNA/DNA gapmer ASO did not reduce the EC50, it somewhat increased the inhibition of virus replication at concentrations exceeding the EC50 (Fig 4A). In part, this effect can be attributed to the increased stability of modified compounds in a biologically relevant environment (Fig 7).
Modified ASOs, where LNA residues are dispersed over the length of the compound, were found to lack an antiviral effect. Consistent with previous studies [71], MixLD4676 and other similarly designed ASOs were unable to trigger RNase H-mediated degradation of the RNA strand in ASO:RNA duplexes (Fig 6B and 6C). These data, similar to those published by Laxton and co-workers [72], highlighted the importance of RNase H-mediated cleavage for the anti-HCV activity of ASOs. RNase H-mediated RNA degradation also depends on the ability of an ASO to form a duplex with its target. Using a short target RNA molecule, duplex formation was shown to be fast, and, as expected, its efficiency correlated with the ASO Tm (Fig 5). Somewhat unexpectedly, the initial speed of degradation of pre-formed ASO:RNA duplexes depended little, if at all, on the modifications introduced into the ASO (Fig 6C). Instead, there was a clear correlation between the efficiency of ASO:RNA duplex formation (Fig 5C) and the efficiency of RNase H-mediated cleavage of FR3131 RNA (Fig 6D), suggesting that in the in vitro RNA cleavage experiment, the efficiency and speed of ASO:RNA duplex formation was the rate-limiting step. However, due to different conditions, including differences in the specificity and abundance of RNase H enzymes in living human cells, the possibility cannot be excluded that the in vivo activity of ASOs does not necessarily correlate with its binding to small model substrates. Indeed, human cells have two different RNase H enzymes. Although the human RNase H1 shares many enzymatic properties with the bacterial enzyme, there are differences. Human RNase H1 binds to A-type RNA:DNA duplexes with much greater activity than bacterial RNase H and displays a strong positional preference for cleavage, i.e., it cleaves between 8 and 12 nucleotides from the 5′-RNA-3′-DNA terminus of the duplex [62]. Therefore, it would be interesting to study whether the presence of 8-oxo-dG residues affects the cleavage specificity of human RNase H enzymes. If this indeed is the case, then such modifications might be particularly useful for constructing ASOs that target viruses that rapidly develop resistance to siRNAs [73,74] or ASOs against RNAs with pre-existing variations in the target site.
Although LDM4676 displayed high activity in different in vitro assays, its value as a potential HCV inhibitor critically depends on its in vivo performance. However, such studies are hampered by the lack of low-cost small-animal models and by the high costs of ASOs containing LNA bases, 8-oxo-dG residues and phosphorothioate modifications (needed for increased in vivo stability) in its backbone. However, should such types of compounds be highly active in vivo, they could contribute to the development of ASO-based HCV treatments. Miravirsen, the first experimental drug of this type, has already been successfully used in clinical trials [26,75,76]. However, miravirsen targets an important cofactor of HCV genome expression and replication, whereas the LDM4676-type ASO targets the HCV genome itself. Combinations of drugs with different mechanisms of action have been key for the successful treatment of chronic infections caused by viruses capable of rapidly developing drug resistance. It is also likely that despite recent progress in the development of orally deliverable oligonucleotide drugs [77,78], a subcutaneous injection will remain the main delivery method for ASOs or their combinations. Therefore, the long half-life of ASOs, allowing once-a-week administration [26,79], represents an important property of such compounds. Correspondingly, increases in the serum half-life, resulting from the insertion of 8-oxo-dG residues (Fig 7), may represent another important benefit of modified ASO compounds.
In this study, multiple obstacles that are commonly encountered in the development of new and efficient ASOs were addressed using unconventional and efficient approaches. For the first time, several highly accessible ASO target sequences in the heavily structured coding region of the RNA genome of HCV were revealed. RNAi-based screening represents an efficient and reliable general method for ASO target site selection. This study also provides an important set of findings concerning the use of naturally occurring, minimally modified nucleobases in ASOs. In contrast to nucleobases that contain bulky modifications, the 8-oxo-dG residues reduced the Tm of ASO:RNA duplexes and had no negative effects on RNase H-mediated degradation of RNA strands in ASO:RNA duplexes. Instead, 8-oxo-dG residues facilitated cleavage by RNase H at multiple positions within the target region. Furthermore, the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues increased the stability of ASOs in human serum. These effects, possibly combined with other properties of modified nucleobases (such as strong base-pairing of their minor tautomeric forms), outweigh the negative effects on the overall Tm of the ASO. This enabled us to obtain modified LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides with EC50 values similar to their non-modified counterparts but capable of almost completely inhibiting HCV replication in replicon cell lines at higher concentrations.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
Estonian Enterprise grant “OLIGO-MOD” (MKarelson) European Regional Development Fund through the Centre of Excellence in Chemical Biology (AM) European Regional Development Fund project 3.2.0701.11-0016 “HCV-TECH” (AM) Estonian Ministry of Education and Research grants SF0140031As09 (MKarelson) and SF0180087s08 (AM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Co-authors AP, TR, MM, AN, LV, EZ, M. Kelve and M. Karelson were employed by GeneCode, Ltd at some period of time when the work results of which have been included into this manuscript was in progress. GeneCode, Ltd. provided support in the form of salaries for authors AP, TR, MM, AN, LV, EŽ and M. Kelve, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
References
- 1. Kling J. Safety signal dampens reception for mipomersen antisense. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28: 295–297. 10.1038/nbt0410-295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Toulmé JJ. New candidates for true antisense. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19: 17–18. 10.1038/83451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hausen P, Stein H. Ribonuclease H. An enzyme degrading the RNA moiety of DNA-RNA hybrids. Eur J Biochem FEBS. 1970;14: 278–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Stein H, Hausen P. Enzyme from calf thymus degrading the RNA moiety of DNA-RNA Hybrids: effect on DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Science. 1969;166: 393–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Deleavey GF, Damha MJ. Designing chemically modified oligonucleotides for targeted gene silencing. Chem Biol. 2012;19: 937–954. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Furdon PJ, Dominski Z, Kole R. RNase H cleavage of RNA hybridized to oligonucleotides containing methylphosphonate, phosphorothioate and phosphodiester bonds. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17: 9193–9204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rait VK, Shaw BR. Boranophosphates support the RNase H cleavage of polyribonucleotides. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1999;9: 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sabatino D, Damha MJ. Oxepane nucleic acids: synthesis, characterization, and properties of oligonucleotides bearing a seven-membered carbohydrate ring. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129: 8259–8270. 10.1021/ja071336c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Verbeure B, Lescrinier E, Wang J, Herdewijn P. RNase H mediated cleavage of RNA by cyclohexene nucleic acid (CeNA). Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29: 4941–4947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Damha MJ, Wilds CJ, Noronha A, Brukner I, Borkow G, Arion D, et al. Hybrids of RNA and Arabinonucleic Acids (ANA and 2‘F-ANA) Are Substrates of Ribonuclease H. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120: 12976–12977. 10.1021/ja982325+ [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heidenreich O, Gryaznov S, Nerenberg M. RNase H-independent antisense activity of oligonucleotide N3 ‘–> P5 â ™ phosphoramidates. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 776–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12. Summerton J. Morpholino antisense oligomers: the case for an RNase H-independent structural type. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1489: 141–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hanvey JC, Peffer NJ, Bisi JE, Thomson SA, Cadilla R, Josey JA, et al. Antisense and antigene properties of peptide nucleic acids. Science. 1992;258: 1481–1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Renneberg D, Bouliong E, Reber U, Schümperli D, Leumann CJ. Antisense properties of tricyclo-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30: 2751–2757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Brown-Driver V, Eto T, Lesnik E, Anderson KP, Hanecak RC. Inhibition of translation of hepatitis C virus RNA by 2-modified antisense oligonucleotides. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1999;9: 145–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Monia BP, Lesnik EA, Gonzalez C, Lima WF, McGee D, Guinosso CJ, et al. Evaluation of 2’-modified oligonucleotides containing 2’-deoxy gaps as antisense inhibitors of gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1993;268: 14514–14522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lok C-N, Viazovkina E, Min K-L, Nagy E, Wilds CJ, Damha MJ, et al. Potent gene-specific inhibitory properties of mixed-backbone antisense oligonucleotides comprised of 2’-deoxy-2’-fluoro-D-arabinose and 2’-deoxyribose nucleotides. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2002;41: 3457–3467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Grünweller A, Wyszko E, Bieber B, Jahnel R, Erdmann VA, Kurreck J. Comparison of different antisense strategies in mammalian cells using locked nucleic acids, 2’-O-methyl RNA, phosphorothioates and small interfering RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31: 3185–3193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kurreck J, Wyszko E, Gillen C, Erdmann VA. Design of antisense oligonucleotides stabilized by locked nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30: 1911–1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wahlestedt C, Salmi P, Good L, Kela J, Johnsson T, Hökfelt T, et al. Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97: 5633–5638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Herdewijn P. Heterocyclic modifications of oligonucleotides and antisense technology. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 2000;10: 297–310. 10.1089/108729000421475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ueno Y, Kumagai I, Haginoya N, Matsuda A. Effects of 5-(N-aminohexyl)carbamoyl-2’-deoxyuridine on endonuclease stability and the ability of oligodeoxynucleotide to activate RNase H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 3777–3782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Flanagan WM, Wolf JJ, Olson P, Grant D, Lin KY, Wagner RW, et al. A cytosine analog that confers enhanced potency to antisense oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96: 3513–3518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kurreck J. Antisense technologies. Improvement through novel chemical modifications. Eur J Biochem FEBS. 2003;270: 1628–1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zamaratski E, Pradeepkumar PI, Chattopadhyaya J. A critical survey of the structure-function of the antisense oligo/RNA heteroduplex as substrate for RNase H. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2001;48: 189–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Janssen HLA, Reesink HW, Lawitz EJ, Zeuzem S, Rodriguez-Torres M, Patel K, et al. Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013;368: 1685–1694. 10.1056/NEJMoa1209026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jin Q, Fleming AM, Ding Y, Burrows CJ, White HS. Structural Destabilization of DNA Duplexes Containing Single-Base Lesions Investigated by Nanopore Measurements. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2013;52: 7870–7877. 10.1021/bi4009825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ganguly M, Szulik MW, Donahue PS, Clancy K, Stone MP, Gold B. Thermodynamic signature of DNA damage: characterization of DNA with a 5-hydroxy-2’-deoxycytidine·2’-deoxyguanosine base pair. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2012;51: 2018–2027. 10.1021/bi3000269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hamm ML, Parker AJ, Steele TWE, Carman JL, Parish CA. Oligonucleotide incorporation and base pair stability of 9-deaza-2’-deoxyguanosine, an analogue of 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine. J Org Chem. 2010;75: 5661–5669. 10.1021/jo1010763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Singh SK, Szulik MW, Ganguly M, Khutsishvili I, Stone MP, Marky LA, et al. Characterization of DNA with an 8-oxoguanine modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39: 6789–6801. 10.1093/nar/gkr275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Shibutani S, Takeshita M, Grollman AP. Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG. Nature. 1991;349: 431–434. 10.1038/349431a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Suen W, Spiro TG, Sowers LC, Fresco JR. Identification by UV resonance Raman spectroscopy of an imino tautomer of 5-hydroxy-2’-deoxycytidine, a powerful base analog transition mutagen with a much higher unfavored tautomer frequency than that of the natural residue 2’-deoxycytidine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96: 4500–4505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Karelson M, Lomaka A. Quantum-chemical modeling of the tautomeric equilibria of modified anionic nucleic acid bases. Ark 2001 Iii 51–62. 2002;2: 51–62. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yin H, Kanasty RL, Eltoukhy AA, Vegas AJ, Dorkin JR, Anderson DG. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15: 541–555. 10.1038/nrg3763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Murray S, Ittig D, Koller E, Berdeja A, Chappell A, Prakash TP, et al. TricycloDNA-modified oligo-2′-deoxyribonucleotides reduce scavenger receptor B1 mRNA in hepatic and extra-hepatic tissues—a comparative study of oligonucleotide length, design and chemistry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: 6135–6143. 10.1093/nar/gks273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hildebrandt-Eriksen ES, Aarup V, Persson R, Hansen HF, Munk ME, Ørum H. A locked nucleic acid oligonucleotide targeting microRNA 122 is well-tolerated in cynomolgus monkeys. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012;22: 152–161. 10.1089/nat.2011.0332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lanford RE, Hildebrandt-Eriksen ES, Petri A, Persson R, Lindow M, Munk ME, et al. Therapeutic silencing of microRNA-122 in primates with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Science. 2010;327: 198–201. 10.1126/science.1178178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Simmonds P, Tuplin A, Evans DJ. Detection of genome-scale ordered RNA structure (GORS) in genomes of positive-stranded RNA viruses: Implications for virus evolution and host persistence. RNA N Y N. 2004;10: 1337–1351. 10.1261/rna.7640104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Alt M, Renz R, Hofschneider PH, Paumgartner G, Caselmann WH. Specific inhibition of hepatitis C viral gene expression by antisense phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides. Hepatol Baltim Md. 1995;22: 707–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Caldarelli SA, Mehiri M, Di Giorgio A, Martin A, Hantz O, Zoulim F, et al. A cyclic PNA-based compound targeting domain IV of HCV IRES RNA inhibits in vitro IRES-dependent translation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005;13: 5700–5709. 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hanecak R, Brown-Driver V, Fox MC, Azad RF, Furusako S, Nozaki C, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide inhibition of hepatitis C virus gene expression in transformed hepatocytes. J Virol. 1996;70: 5203–5212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lima WF, Brown-Driver V, Fox M, Hanecak R, Bruice TW. Combinatorial screening and rational optimization for hybridization to folded hepatitis C virus RNA of oligonucleotides with biological antisense activity. J Biol Chem. 1997;272: 626–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. McCaffrey AP, Meuse L, Karimi M, Contag CH, Kay MA. A potent and specific morpholino antisense inhibitor of hepatitis C translation in mice. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2003;38: 503–508. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mizutani T, Kato N, Hirota M, Sugiyama K, Murakami A, Shimotohno K. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication by antisense oligonucleotide in culture cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;212: 906–911. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Nulf CJ, Corey D. Intracellular inhibition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)-dependent translation by peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) and locked nucleic acids (LNAs). Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 3792–3798. 10.1093/nar/gkh706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wakita T, Wands JR. Specific inhibition of hepatitis C virus expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. In vitro model for selection of target sequence. J Biol Chem. 1994;269: 14205–14210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001;411: 494–498. 10.1038/35078107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lopp A, Reintamm T, Kuusksalu A, de Rosa S, Kelve M. A novel endoribonuclease from the marine sponge Tethya aurantium specific to 2’,5’-phosphodiester bonds. Biochimie. 2012;94: 1635–1646. 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. You Y, Tataurov AV, Owczarzy R. Measuring thermodynamic details of DNA hybridization using fluorescence. Biopolymers. 2011;95: 472–486. 10.1002/bip.21615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Das PK, Merits A, Lulla A. Functional cross-talk between distant domains of chikungunya virus non-structural protein 2 is decisive for its RNA-modulating activity. J Biol Chem. 2014;289: 5635–5653. 10.1074/jbc.M113.503433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Nikonov A, Juronen E, Ustav M. Functional characterization of fingers subdomain-specific monoclonal antibodies inhibiting the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283: 24089–24102. 10.1074/jbc.M803422200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Elbashir SM, Martinez J, Patkaniowska A, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Functional anatomy of siRNAs for mediating efficient RNAi in Drosophila melanogaster embryo lysate. EMBO J. 2001;20: 6877–6888. 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kapadia SB, Brideau-Andersen A, Chisari FV. Interference of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by short interfering RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 2014–2018. 10.1073/pnas.252783999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wilson JA, Jayasena S, Khvorova A, Sabatinos S, Rodrigue-Gervais IG, Arya S, et al. RNA interference blocks gene expression and RNA synthesis from hepatitis C replicons propagated in human liver cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 2783–2788. 10.1073/pnas.252758799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Frese M, Barth K, Kaul A, Lohmann V, Schwärzle V, Bartenschlager R. Hepatitis C virus RNA replication is resistant to tumour necrosis factor-alpha. J Gen Virol. 2003;84: 1253–1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Krieger N, Lohmann V, Bartenschlager R. Enhancement of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by cell culture-adaptive mutations. J Virol. 2001;75: 4614–4624. 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4614-4624.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Tong X, Chase R, Skelton A, Chen T, Wright-Minogue J, Malcolm BA. Identification and analysis of fitness of resistance mutations against the HCV protease inhibitor SCH 503034. Antiviral Res. 2006;70: 28–38. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2005.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Burdick AD, Sciabola S, Mantena SR, Hollingshead BD, Stanton R, Warneke JA, et al. Sequence motifs associated with hepatotoxicity of locked nucleic acid—modified antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: 4882–4891. 10.1093/nar/gku142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Grünweller A, Hartmann RK. Locked nucleic acid oligonucleotides: the next generation of antisense agents? BioDrugs Clin Immunother Biopharm Gene Ther. 2007;21: 235–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Nowotny M, Gaidamakov SA, Ghirlando R, Cerritelli SM, Crouch RJ, Yang W. Structure of Human RNase H1 Complexed with an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Insight into HIV Reverse Transcription. Mol Cell. 2007;28: 264–276. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Min K-L, Viazovkina E, Galarneau A, Parniak MA, Damha MJ. Oligonucleotides comprised of alternating 2’-deoxy-2’-fluoro-beta-D-arabinonucleosides and D-2’-deoxyribonucleosides (2’F-ANA/DNA “altimers”) induce efficient RNA cleavage mediated by RNase H. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2002;12: 2651–2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Wu H, Lima WF, Crooke ST. Properties of Cloned and Expressed Human RNase H1. J Biol Chem. 1999;274: 28270–28278. 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Obad S, dos Santos CO, Petri A, Heidenblad M, Broom O, Ruse C, et al. Silencing of microRNA families by seed-targeting tiny LNAs. Nat Genet. 2011;43: 371–378. 10.1038/ng.786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Jang YH, Goddard WA, Noyes KT, Sowers LC, Hwang S, Chung DS. First principles calculations of the tautomers and pK(a) values of 8-oxoguanine: implications for mutagenicity and repair. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002;15: 1023–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Watts JM, Dang KK, Gorelick RJ, Leonard CW, Bess JW, Swanstrom R, et al. Architecture and secondary structure of an entire HIV-1 RNA genome. Nature. 2009;460: 711–716. 10.1038/nature08237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Pang PS, Elazar M, Pham EA, Glenn JS. Simplified RNA secondary structure mapping by automation of SHAPE data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39: e151 10.1093/nar/gkr773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Romero-López C, Barroso-Deljesus A, García-Sacristán A, Briones C, Berzal-Herranz A. The folding of the hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site depends on the 3’-end of the viral genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: 11697–11713. 10.1093/nar/gks927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Tuplin A, Struthers M, Simmonds P, Evans DJ. A twist in the tail: SHAPE mapping of long-range interactions and structural rearrangements of RNA elements involved in HCV replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: 6908–6921. 10.1093/nar/gks370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Fiers W, Contreras R, Duerinck F, Haegeman G, Iserentant D, Merregaert J, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage MS2 RNA: primary and secondary structure of the replicase gene. Nature. 1976;260: 500–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Van Meerten D, Girard G, van Duin J. Translational control by delayed RNA folding: identification of the kinetic trap. RNA N Y N. 2001;7: 483–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Kurreck J. Antisense technologies. Improvement through novel chemical modifications. Eur J Biochem FEBS. 2003;270: 1628–1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Laxton C, Brady K, Moschos S, Turnpenny P, Rawal J, Pryde DC, et al. Selection, optimization, and pharmacokinetic properties of a novel, potent antiviral locked nucleic acid-based antisense oligomer targeting hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55: 3105–3114. 10.1128/AAC.00222-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wilson JA, Richardson CD. Hepatitis C virus replicons escape RNA interference induced by a short interfering RNA directed against the NS5b coding region. J Virol. 2005;79: 7050–7058. 10.1128/JVI.79.11.7050-7058.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zhou J, Rossi JJ. Current progress in the development of RNAi-based therapeutics for HIV-1. Gene Ther. 2011;18: 1134–1138. 10.1038/gt.2011.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Van der Ree MH, van der Meer AJ, de Bruijne J, Maan R, van Vliet A, Welzel TM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of microRNA-targeted therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. Antiviral Res. 2014;111: 53–59. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ottosen S, Parsley TB, Yang L, Zeh K, van Doorn L-J, van der Veer E, et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Preclinical and Clinical Resistance Profile of Miravirsen, a Novel Anti-Hepatitis C Virus Therapeutic Targeting the Human Factor miR-122. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59: 599–608. 10.1128/AAC.04220-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Van Putten M, Young C, van den Berg S, Pronk A, Hulsker M, Karnaoukh TG, et al. Preclinical studies on intestinal administration of antisense oligonucleotides as a model for oral delivery for treatment of duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3: e211 10.1038/mtna.2014.62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Tillman LG, Geary RS, Hardee GE. Oral delivery of antisense oligonucleotides in man. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97: 225–236. 10.1002/jps.21084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Hair P, Cameron F, McKeage K. Mipomersen sodium: first global approval. Drugs. 2013;73: 487–493. 10.1007/s40265-013-0042-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.