Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2015 May;11(5):20150185. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0185

Molecular evolution of the hyaluronan synthase 2 gene in mammals: implications for adaptations to the subterranean niche and cancer resistance

Christopher G Faulkes 1,, Kalina T J Davies 1, Stephen J Rossiter 1, Nigel C Bennett 2
PMCID: PMC4455745  PMID: 25948568

Abstract

The naked mole-rat (NMR) Heterocephalus glaber is a unique and fascinating mammal exhibiting many unusual adaptations to a subterranean lifestyle. The recent discovery of their resistance to cancer and exceptional longevity has opened up new and important avenues of research. Part of this resistance to cancer has been attributed to the fact that NMRs produce a modified form of hyaluronan—a key constituent of the extracellular matrix—that is thought to confer increased elasticity of the skin as an adaptation for living in narrow tunnels. This so-called high molecular mass hyaluronan (HMM-HA) stems from two apparently unique substitutions in the hyaluronan synthase 2 enzyme (HAS2). To test whether other subterranean mammals with similar selection pressures also show molecular adaptation in their HAS2 gene, we sequenced the HAS2 gene for 11 subterranean mammals and closely related species, and combined these with data from 57 other mammals. Comparative screening revealed that one of the two putatively important HAS2 substitutions in the NMR predicted to have a significant effect on hyaluronan synthase function was uniquely shared by all African mole-rats. Interestingly, we also identified multiple other amino acid substitutions in key domains of the HAS2 molecule, although the biological consequences of these for hyaluronan synthesis remain to be determined. Despite these results, we found evidence of strong purifying selection acting on the HAS2 gene across all mammals, and the NMR remains unique in its particular HAS2 sequence. Our results indicate that more work is needed to determine whether the apparent cancer resistance seen in NMR is shared by other members of the African mole-rat clade.

Keywords: naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus, hyaluronan, hyaluronan synthase, Bathyergidae, subterranean mammal

1. Introduction

The naked mole-rat (NMR) Heterocephaus glaber is emerging as an important ‘non-model’ organism for the study of longevity and healthy ageing. A range of physiological and molecular/biochemical adaptations underpin the lack of senescence observed in this small Hystricomorph rodent that can live for 32 years—10 times longer than a mouse and more than five times longer than predicted for its body size [1].

There has been considerable interest in the ability of NMRs to resist cancer [1,2], and recently, a mechanism involving the production of a high molecular mass hyaluronan (HMM-HA) has been proposed [3]. Hyaluronan (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan and its presence in a variety of tissues and the extracellular matrix has been linked to many cellular processes, such as cell division, motility and morphogenesis [4], and also implicated in the development of some cancers [5]. HMM-HA is up to six times the mass of the largest human HA. The novel anti-cancer mechanism identified in the NMR has been termed early contact inhibition (ECI). This is a process whereby cell growth occurring when cells come into contact with each other, or with the extracellular matrix, is arrested at much lower densities than in the mouse. Contact inhibition is lost in cancer cells, and the loss of ECI makes cells more susceptible to malignant transformation [6]. ECI is controlled by the interaction of HA with the CD44–NF2 pathway, which mediates contact inhibition [3]. In addition, NMRs also produce a novel tumour suppressor protein (an isoform of INK4) in response to HMM-HA stimulation. Induction of INK4 is associated with contact inhibition and leads to cell-cycle arrest, contributing to tumour resistance [7]. In the NMR, it has been postulated that selection for its characteristic loose, elastic skin is an adaptation to living underground in tight tunnels and confined spaces, and that the elasticity of the skin is facilitated by HMM-HA [3]. Thus, the cancer resistance imparted by HMM-HA may be a secondary and fortuitous consequence of the primary function of HMM-HA under selection.

Hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2) is one of three characterized membrane-embedded HA synthases responsible for the synthesis of HA from intracellular precursors, and deposition into the extracellular matrix [8]. Tian et al. [3] showed that HMM-HA is produced in NMRs by a uniquely modified version of the HAS2 gene, and accumulates owing to extremely low hyaluronidase activity. Specifically, two serine substitutions at highly conserved sites in the cytoplasmic domains of exons 2 and 4 appear to confer upon the protein molecule the ability to produce HMM-HA: when NMR HAS2 was overexpressed in a human HEK293 cell culture, secretion of HMM-HA was observed [3].

Given the link between NMR cancer resistance, HMM-HA and specific mutations in HAS2, together with the advantages of an elastic skin in the subterranean niche, we predict that production of HMM-HA may not be unique to NMRs, and that discovery of other HAS2 mutations may be of potential interest to cancer research. This study, therefore, aims to test for possible parallel signatures of adaptive evolution in the HAS2 gene in other mammals with shared selection pressures; in particular, other members of the African mole-rat family (Bathyergidae), as well as divergent subterranean insectivorous mammals within the superorders Afrotheria and Laurasiatheria.

2. Material and methods

We generated new HAS2 sequence data from 11 subterranean mammal species representing five divergent families (table 1; electronic supplementary material, Methods). These were combined with new sequences from two close outgroups of the Bathyergidae (cane rat and Cape porcupine), and a further 57 representative mammalian HAS2 sequences from all species available at the time of the study on GenBank (table 1). Sequences were aligned manually for analysis using Mesquite [9] and genetic distances calculated using MEGA v. 6 [10]. To test for signatures of selection acting along 519 codons of HAS2 (exons 2 and 4) across all 70 mammal species included in our study, we implemented site, branch-site and clade models with the codeml package in PAML v. 4.4 [11], using a mammal species tree topology based on published studies [1214]. Amino acid polymorphisms were analysed using MAPP [15], which implements a predictive statistical framework to score the physico-chemical impact of substitutions in multiple alignments of orthologues. Novel sequences have been deposited in GenBank.

Table 1.

Sample list, taxonomy and accession numbers/EMSEMBL Transcript ID for the HAS2 sequences included in our analysis.

scientific name common name order; family accession number
Homo sapiens human Primates; Hominidae U54804.1
Pan troglodytes chimpanzee Primates; Hominidae XM528222.4
Pan paniscus bonobo Primates; Hominidae XM3820492.1
Pongo abelii orangutan Primates; Hominidae XM3777303.1
Nomascus leucogenys northern white-cheeked gibbon Primates; Cercopithecidae XM3256164.2
Macaca fascicularis crab-eating macaque Primates; Cercopithecidae XM5564005.1
Macaca mulatta rhesus macaque Primates; Cercopithecidae XM1098841.2
Chlorocebus sabaeus green monkey Primates; Cercopithecidae XM8001453.1
Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis squirrel monkey Primates; Cebidae XM3933098.1
Callithrix jacchus common marmoset Primates; Callitrichidae XM2759268.2
Otolemur garnettii Garnett's greater galago Primates; Galagidae XM_3782374.1
Tarsius syrichta Philippine tarsier Primates; Tarsiidae XM8056607.1
Tupaia chinensis Chinese tree shrew Scandentia; Tupaiidae XM_6157522.1
Lipotes vexillifer Yangtze River dolphin Cetacea; Lipotidae XM_7445586.1
Physeter catodon sperm whale Cetacea; Physeteridae XM_7106932.1
Odobenus rosmarus divergens walrus Carnivora; Odobenidae XM_4416640.1
Leptonychotes weddellii Weddell seal Carnivora; Phocidae XM_6739332.1
Canis lupus familiaris dog Carnivora; Canidae XM_539153.4
Panthera tigris altaica tiger Carnivora; Felidae XM_7075592.1
Felis catus cat Carnivora; Felidae XM_4000089.2
Ailuropoda melanoleuca panda Carnivora; Ursidae XM_2927908.1
Mustela putoriua furo ferret Carnivora; Mustelidae XM_4804975.1
Myotis davidii David's mouse-eared bat Chiroptera; Vespertilionidae XM_6769087.1
Myotis lucifugus little brown bat Chiroptera; Vespertilionidae XM_6085251.1
Myotis brandtii Brandt's bat Chiroptera; Vespertilionidae XM_5885867.1
Eptesicus fuscus big brown bat Chiroptera; Vespertilionidae XM_8143356.1
Pteropus alecto black flying fox Chiroptera; Pteropodidae XM6916584.1
Elephantulus edwardii Cape elephant shrew Macroscelidea; Macroscelididae XM_6879317.1
Orycteropus afer afer aardvark Tubulidentata; Orycteropodidae XM_7943422.1
Trichechus manatus latirostris Florida manatee Sirenia; Trichechidae XM_4372979.1
Procavia capensis rock hyrax Hyracoidea; Procaviidae ENSPCAG00000005792
Loxodonta africana African elephant Proboscidea; Elephantidae XM_003408169
Echinops telfairi lesser hedgehog tenrec Afrosoricida; Tenrecidae XM_004697409
Amblysomus hottentotusa golden mole Afrosoricida; Chrysochloridae KR057419
Oryctolagus cuniculus European rabbit Lagomorpha; Leporidae AB055978.1
Ochotona princeps American pika Lagomorpha; Ochotonidae XM_6982381.1
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus thirteen-lined ground squirrel Rodentia; Sciuridae XM_5316195.1
Mus musculus mouse Rodentia; Muridae U52524.2
Rattus norvegicus rat Rodentia; Muridae AF008201.1
Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii prairie deer mouse Rodentia; Cricetidae XM_6982381.1
Cricetulus griseus Chinese hamster Rodentia; Cricetidae XM_7638417.1
Mesocricetus auratus golden hamster Rodentia; Cricetidae XM_5082729.1
Tachyorychtes splendensa East African root rat Rodentia; Spalacidae KR057420
Nannospalax galili blind mole-rat Rodentia; Spalacidae XM_008837986.1
Fukomys zechia Ghana mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057425
Fukomys damarensisa Damaraland mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057427
Georychus capensisa Cape dune mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057424
Cryptomys hottentotusa common mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057422
Bathyergus janettaa Namaqua dune mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057423
Bathyergus suillusa dune mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057421
Heliophobius kapitia silvery mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae KR057426
Heterocephalus glaber naked mole-rat Rodentia; Bathyergidae XM_004883123
Thryonomys swinderianusa cane rat Rodentia; Thryonomyidae KR057428
Hystrix africaeaustralisa Cape porcupine Rodentia; Hystricidae KR057429
Ctenomys perrensia tuco-tuco Rodentia; Ctenomyidae KR057430
Cavia porcellus guinea pig Rodentia; Caviidae XM_003463665
Chinchilla lanigera chinchilla Rodentia; Chinchillidae XM5410908.1
Sorex araneus common shrew Eulipotyphla; Soricidae XM4607644.1
Talpa europaeaa European mole Eulipotyphla; Talpidae KR057431
Condylura cristata star-nosed mole Eulipotyphla; Talpidae XM_4679612.1
Erinaceus europaeus European hedgehog Eulipotyphla; Erinaceidae XM7520808.1
Vicugna pacos alpaca Artiodactyla; Camelidae XM_6211418.1
Bos taurus cow Artiodactyla; Bovidae XM_174079.2
Capra hircus goat Artiodactyla; Bovidae XM_5688873.1
Sus scrofa pig Artiodactyla; Suidae XM_214053.1
Equus caballus horse Perissodactyla; Equidae XM_1081801.1
Ceratotherium simum simum white rhinoceros Perissodactyla; Rhinocerotidae XM_4431107.1
Dasypus novemcinctus nine-banded armadillo Cingulata; Dasypodidae XM_4480750.1
Monodelphis domestica opossum Didelphimorphia; Didelphidae XM_1370252.2
Ornithorhynchus anatinus duck-billed platypus Monotremata; Ornithorhynchidae XM_1505190.2

aSpecies sequenced for this study.

3. Results and discussion

Overall measures of variation among 70 taxa revealed p-distances (nucleotide) ranging from 0.08 (chimp versus bonobo) to 19.53% (Philippine tarsier versus Opossum) and from zero (e.g. human versus chimp) to 15.26% (Cape elephant shrew versus opossum) for amino acid substitutions (see electronic supplementary material, table S2 for distances and table S3 for a complete amino acid alignment for all taxa). Site, branch-site and clade models implemented in PAML did not find evidence for positive selection; instead, all models suggest that HAS2 is under purifying (negative) selection with ω values of less than 1 across all mammals (p < 0.001; see electronic supplementary material, Results). Despite this, we identified multiple amino acid substitutions in key domains of the HAS2 molecule, including those previously described for the NMR (see figure 1; electronic supplementary material, table S3), although we observed no obvious substitutions shared across subterranean mammals. Of particular interest are the residues at sites 178 and 301 that facilitate production of HMM-HA in NMRs. Our results show that the serine substitution at site 178 in NMRs is only present in one other mammal, the cane rat, a close outgroup to the Bathyergidae, and thus perhaps arose convergently. Interestingly, however, the neighbouring site 177 has a serine residue substituted with an alanine in the cane rat and all bathyergids except the NMR. Replacement of a serine (which is readily phosphorylated and often important in the active site of enzymes) with an alanine is likely to have functional significance (p < 0.001 in MAPP analysis). The serine substitution at site 301 of the NMR is present in all bathyergid genera, but no other mammals, and is a shared derived character (synapomorphy) for the group (electronic supplementary material, figures S1–S3). There are also a number of other unique substitutions in particular species of the Bathyergidae/cane rat (e.g. sites 149 and 162; figure 1). Analysis of these polymorphisms using MAPP revealed multiple significant mutations (figure 1). Among the bathyergids, the Damaraland and silvery mole-rats ranked highest with five significant substitutions, followed by four in common, Cape dune, dune and Namaqua dune mole-rats, and three in the Ghana mole-rat. The NMR had just two—the aforementioned substitutions at sites 178 and 301 (figure 1; electronic supplementary material, figure S4 and table S3). The blind mole-rat HAS2 sequence is unremarkable and similar to the mouse and root rat, despite the fact that this species has also been reported to produce HMM-HA [3]. Thus, the mechanism of HMM-HA production in blind mole-rats may differ from that of NMRs, and cancer resistance also reported in this species appears to be mediated by a different mechanism [16,17]. It is noteworthy that these substitutions were relatively low within the context of the entire mammal dataset examined, where a maximum value of 21 substitutions predicted to have a significant effect was observed in the Cape elephant shrew (electronic supplementary material, table S3 and Supplementary results).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic relationships and corresponding HAS2 sequences of five clades containing subterranean mammals (red branches), including non-subterranean ingroup comparisons, the human and a marsupial (opossum) outgroup (black branches). The Bathyergidae are the monophyletic clade denoted by the red circle. Adjacent panels show the respective variable amino acids for exons 2 and 4 (site numbers indicated above columns). Shaded bars indicate the relative locations of sites in the molecule (extracellular, transmembrane or cytoplasmic). The key amino acid residues at sites 178 and 301—that facilitate production of HMM-HA in NMRs—are indicated by the bold border. Asterisks below sites denote significance of substitutions estimated by MAPP analysis: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant; 1: R = ns, V = **, I = *, T = **; 2: T = **, V = *, Q = ns; 3: V = ***, A = **, Q = ns; 4: R = **, I = ns, L = ns; 5:A = *, S = ns; 6: V = *, I = ns; 7: E = *, A = ns. Numbers at the end of the respective sequence alignments denote the number of substitutions per taxon that are predicted to have a significant impact on protein function.

These results raise interesting questions regarding the functional significance of the observed changes in the HAS2 amino acid sequence, and whether there is any correlation with longevity and cancer resistance (where known). Within the Bathyergidae, so far no other taxa are known to live as long as NMRs. Species such as the dune mole-rats (genus Bathyergus) and Georychus generally have short lifespans in the order of 4–6 years ([18], N. C. Bennett 2014, unpublished data), although two Georychus are known to have lived for 10 and 11 years, respectively, in captivity [19]. The Silvery mole-rat (Heliophobius) and some Fukomys (e.g. Damaraland and Zambian mole-rats) may commonly live more than 7 and 10 years, respectively [19,20], and sometimes up to 15+ years [20]. The absence of cancer has only been noted in NMRs, but there is a paucity of studies on other species in this context. Thus, the role of HAS2 and HA in other species remains unclear, but it is likely that multiple factors contribute to longevity. Nevertheless, our results and analysis provide the basis for further studies to establish the functional significance of HAS2 variants, using in vitro methods to characterize the different versions of HA produced, and the role they may play in cancer resistance.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material
rsbl20150185supp1.pdf (11.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Ruth Rose for cloning, and the following for sample collection: Walter Verheyen (Tachyoryctes and Heliophobius), Patricia Mirol (Ctenomys), Kweku Dakwa (F. zechi) and Clair and Mark Rylands (Talpa). N.C.B. acknowledges funding from the DST-NRF SARChI Chair for Behavioural Ecology and Physiology; S.J.R. and K.T.J.D. were supported by the European Research Council.

Ethical statement

All procedures involving live animals and sample collection described in this manuscript were conducted in accordance with appropriate national and provincial guidelines, permits and regulations.

Data accessibility

New DNA sequence data have been deposited in GenBank accession numbers: KR057419–KR057431 (table 1).

Authors' contributions

C.G.F. conceived of, designed and coordinated the study, carried out the molecular laboratory work and sequence alignments, participated in data analysis and drafted the manuscript; K.T.J.D. designed primers, participated in data analysis and bioinformatics; S.J.R. participated in data analysis; N.C.B. provided samples and funding. All authors contributed to critical assessment of the results, manuscript revisions and gave final approval for publication.

Conflict of interest

We have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Buffenstein R. 2008. Negligible senescence in the longest living rodent, the naked mole-rat: insights from a successfully aging species. J. Comp. Physiol. B 178, 439–445. ( 10.1007/s00360-007-0237-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Delaney MA, Nagy L, Kinsel MJ, Treuting PM. 2013. Spontaneous histologic lesions of the adult naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber): a retrospective survey of lesions in a zoo population. Vet. Pathol. 50, 607–621. ( 10.1177/0300985812471543) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tian X, et al. 2013. High-molecular-mass hyaluronan mediates the cancer resistance of the naked mole rat. Nature 499, 346–349. ( 10.1038/nature12234) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fraser JRE, Laurent TC, Laurent UBG. 1997. Hyaluronan: its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J. Intern. Med. 242, 27–33. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stern R. 2009. Association between cancer and ‘acid mucopolysaccharides’: an old concept comes of age, finally. In Hyaluronan in cancer biology (ed. Stern R.), pp. 3–16. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seluanov A, Hine C, Azpurua J, Feigenson M, Bozzella M, Mao Z, Catania KC, Gorbunova V. 2009. Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19 352–19 357. ( 10.1073/pnas.0905252106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tian X, Azpurua J, Ke Z, Augereau A, Zhang ZD, Vijg J, Gladyshev VN, Gorbunova V, Seluanov A. 2015. INK4 locus of the tumor-resistant rodent, the naked mole rat, expresses a functional p15/p16 hybrid isoform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1053–1058. ( 10.1073/pnas.1418203112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Watanabe K, Yamaguchi Y. 1996. Molecular identification of a putative human hyaluronan synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22 945–22 948. ( 10.1074/jbc.271.38.22945) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2014. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.01. See http://mesquiteproject.org.
  • 10.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725–2729. ( 10.1093/molbev/mst197) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang ZH. 2007. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591. ( 10.1093/molbev/msm088) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Faulkes CG, Verheyen E, Verheyen W, Jarvis JUM, Bennett NC. 2004. Phylogeographic patterns of speciation and genetic divergence in African mole-rats (Family Bathyergidae). Mol. Ecol. 13, 613–629. ( 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02099.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Blanga-Kanfi S, Miranda H, Penn O, Pupko T, DeBry R, Huchon D. 2009. Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 71 ( 10.1186/1471-2148-9-71) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meredith RW, et al. 2011. Impacts of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334, 521–524. ( 10.1126/science.1211028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stone EA, Siddow A. 2005. Physicochemical constraint violation by missense substitutions mediates impairment of protein function and disease severity. Genome Res. 15, 978–986. ( 10.1101/gr.3804205) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gorbunova V, Hinea C, Tian X, Ablaeva J, Gudkov AV, Nevo E, Seluanov A. 2012. Cancer resistance in the blind mole rat is mediated by concerted necrotic cell death mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19 392–19 396. ( 10.1073/pnas.1217211109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, Zhang Z, Gladyshev VN, Vijg J. 2014. Comparative genetics of longevity and cancer: insights from long-lived rodents. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 531–540. ( 10.1038/nrg3728) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bennett NC, Maree S, Faulkes CG. 2006. Georychus capensis. Mamm. Species 799, 1–4. ( 10.1644/799.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weigl R. 2005. Longevity of mammals in captivity; from the living collections of the world. Stuttgart, Germany: Kleine Senckenberg-Reihe 48. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tacutu R, Craig T, Budovsky T, Wuttke D, Lehmann G, Taranukha D, Costa J, Fraifeld VE, de Magalhães JP. 2013. Human ageing genomic resources: integrated databases and tools for the biology and genetics of ageing. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D102–D1033. ( 10.1093/nar/gks1155) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material
rsbl20150185supp1.pdf (11.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

New DNA sequence data have been deposited in GenBank accession numbers: KR057419–KR057431 (table 1).


Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES