Skip to main content
Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology logoLink to Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology
. 2013 Apr 23;39(2):321–323. doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0297-2

Hymenolepiosis in a group of albino rats (Rattus albus): a study

C Sreedevi 1,, P Ravi Kumar 2, Ch Jyothisree 3
PMCID: PMC4456554  PMID: 26064027

Abstract

A study was carried out on adult albino Wistar laboratory rats to know the incidence of hymenolepiosis, a zoonotic disease which were brought for experiment purpose. Faecal samples of 95 rats examined for parasitic infection by simple floatation technique in which 32 were positive (33.68 %) for hymenolepiosis. Identification of species of Hymenolepis was done based on morphology of egg. The highest prevalence of Hymenolepis diminuta (23.15 %) was recorded followed by Hymenolepis nana (10.52 %). Heavy infection with Hymenolepis in rats draws attention in view of public health importance in contact persons.

Keywords: Hymenolepis nana, Hymenolepis diminuta, Albino rats, Zoonosis

Introduction

Hymenolepiosis, is a disease caused by cestode parasites Hymenolepis diminuta and H. nana that are potentially zoonotic. Generally hymenolepiosis is associated with gastrointestinal disturbances in intended host. Hymenolepis diminuta’s definitive hosts are rodents. Rarely, man becomes infected due to accidental ingestion of infected beetles.

Hymenolepis nana is common in man and rats and is a unique tape worm with a direct life cycle where the eggs eaten by human or rodents develop to cysticercoids within the villli and develop to adults in the lumen (Palmer et al. 2011). Hymenolepis nana was reported to be a common cause of pediatric diarrhoea in urban slum dwellings in India (Mirda and Samantry 2002) and an important causes of infant mortality particularly in rural area of Mexico (Martinez-Barbosa et al. 2010). Highest prevalence occurs in human in poor areas and in institutions due to the possible direct faeco-oral and human–human transfer. Studies were carried out in different parts of world to identify and determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of gasrointestinal parasites of laboratory animals especially the rats (Goswami et al. 2011; Guddissa et al. 2011; Paramasvaran et al. 2009) and in human beings (Tena et al. 1998; Maranzi et al. 2003; Watwe and Dardi 2008; Yakoob and Hadi 2009; Martinez-Barbosa et al. 2010). Since, rodent’s endoparasites are frequently causing zoonotic problem, the present study was carried out to observe the incidence of hymenolepiosis in naturally infected adult albino laboratory Wistar rats.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted on 95 adult albino Wistar laboratory rats that were procured to study the pharmacokinetics of drugs by Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, NTR College of Veterinary Science, Gannavaram. Faecal samples of rats were collected in sterile wide mouthed screw cap bottles and were examined macroscopically for the presence of tape worm segments followed by microscopic examination by simple faecal floatation technique using 33.3 percent zinc sulphate solution as described by Soulsby (1982). Identification of parasitic eggs was carried out by their morphology (Palmer et al. 2011).

Results and discussion

Macroscopic examination of faeces revealed no tape worm segments. Microscopic examination of concentrated faecal samples revealed the presence of eggs of Hymenolepis Spp. Egg of H. nana (Fig. 1) was oval shaped with hexacanth embryo surrounded by two smooth membranes, the outer thin and clean and the inner with two polar thickenings each bearing 4–8 filaments. The egg of H. diminuta (Fig. 2) was spherical and same as that of H.nana except with a thicker outer membrane and the polar thickenings without filaments (Palmer et al. 2011). Thirty-two (33.68 %) rats were infected with species of Hymenolepis. Of these twenty-two (22.15 %) were positive for H. diminuta and ten (10.52 %) for H. nana. The present finding was in accordance with Guddissa et al. (2011) reporting 33.93 % prevalence of cestodes in rats at Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute (EHNRI), Addis Ababa and the most prevalent being H. dinminuta (26.79 %) followed by H. nana (7.1 %). However Muznebin et al. (2009) reported highest prevalence of H. dinminuta (72.92 %) and H. nana (56.25 %) than observed in the present study. Goswami et al. (2011) also reported high prevalence of H. diminuta infection (24 %) in albino laboratory Wistar rats.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Egg of Hymenolepis nana in unstained mount (×1,000)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Egg of Hymenolepis diminuta in unstained mount (×400)

In an another study Waugh et al. (2006) recorded low level of infection of H. diminuta (3.8 %) out of nine species of gastrointestinal helminths recovered from rats in Jamica whereas Kataranovski et al. (2011) reported H. diminuta infection (30.5 %) as most prevalent among seven helminth species identified in rats (Ratus norvegicus) in the Belgrade.

Despite heavy infection with Hymenolepis, all rats in the present study appeared healthy (Claveria et al. 2005; Goswami et al. 2011) suggestive of well established host parasite relationship though infection could be associated with slow growth and pot bellied condition (Owen 1992). The reason for high prevalence of hymenolepiosis in experimental albino rats could be due to the housing conditions of rats in cages leading to increased faeco-oral transmission or contamination of cereal foods with infested beetles as was also opined by other authors (Muznebin et al. 2009; Palmer et al. 2011) which in turn readily facilitate parasite transmission to human and other susceptible animals when there is a close contact (Fan 2005). All experimental rats were dewormed to improve the quality of research animals and to reduce the risk of contact person’s infection. The results of the study emphasized that care should be taken while handling the laboratory rats in addition to the maintenance of hygienic conditions of animal house as they are natural reservoir of parasitic infections of public heath importance and also contact persons should be aware of the risk of parasitic zoonosis from these animals.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Associate Dean, NTR College of Veterinary Science, SVVU, Gannavaram for the facilities provided.

References

  1. Claveria FG, Causapin J, Guzman MA, et al. Parasite biodiversity in Rattus spp caught in wet market. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36(4):146–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fan DC. Infectivity and development of the human strain of H. nana in ICR mice. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36:97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goswami R, Mohan Singh S, Kataria M, Somvansi R. Clinicopathological studies on spontaneous Hymenolepis diminuta infection in wild and laboratory rats. Braz J Vet Pathol. 2011;4(2):103–111. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guddissa T, Mazengia H, Alemo S, Nigussie M. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of laboratory animals at Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute (EHNRI) Addis Ababa. J Infect Dis Immunol. 2011;3(1):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kataranovski M, Mirkov I, Belij S, et al. Intestinal helminths infection of rats (Ratus norvegicus) in the Belgrade area (Serbia): the effect of sex, age and habitat. Parasite. 2011;18(2):189–196. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2011182189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maranzi M, Zechini B, Fileti A, et al. Hymenolepis diminuta infection in a child living in rural area of Roma, Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3994–3995. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3994-3995.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Martinez-Barbosa I, Gutierrez-Cardenas EM, Gaona E, Shea M. The prevalence of Hymenolepis nana in school children in a bicultural community. Rev Biomed. 2010;21:21–27. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mirda BR, Samantry JC. Hymenolepis nana: common cause of pediatric diarrhoea in urban slum dwellings in India. J Trop Pediatr. 2002;48:331–334. doi: 10.1093/tropej/48.6.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Muznebin F, Khanum H, Nessia Z, Islam D. Endoparasitic infection in laboratory rat strain, Long Evans (Rattus norvegicus, Berknhout, 1769) Bangladesh J Sci Res. 2009;44(11):109–116. [Google Scholar]
  10. Palmer SR, Soulsby EJL, Torgerson PR, Brown DWG (2011) Oxford text book of zoonoses. Biology, clinical practice and public health control. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Newyork
  11. Paramasvaran S, Sani RA, Hassan L, et al. Endo-parasite fauna of rodents caught in five wet markets in Kuala Lumpur and its potential zoonotic implications. Trop Biomed. 2009;26(1):67–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Soulsby EJL. Helminth, arthopods and protozoa of domesticated animals. London: Bailliere Tindal and Cassell Ltd.; 1982. pp. 765–767. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tena D, Pérez Simón M, Gimeno C, et al. Human infection with Hymenolepis diminuta: case report from Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(8):2375–2376. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.8.2375-2376.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Watwe S, Dardi CK. Hymenolepis diminuta infection in a child from rural area. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51:149–151. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.40431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Waugh CA, Lindo JF, Foronda P, et al. Population distribution and zoonotic potential of gastrointestinal helminths of wild rats Rattus rattus and R. norvegicus from Jamaica. J Parasitol. 2006;92(5):1014–1018. doi: 10.1645/GE-795R1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yakoob AI, Hadi AM. Prevalence of Hymenolepis nana in children in Bhagdad-AI-Resafa. Iraq J Vet Med. 2009;33(2):158–162. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES