Skip to main content
Neurology logoLink to Neurology
. 2015 Jun 2;84(22):2266–2273. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001648

Homozygous carriers of APP A713T mutation in an autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease family

Maria E Conidi 1,*, Livia Bernardi 1,*, Gianfranco Puccio 1, Nicoletta Smirne 1, Maria G Muraca 1, Sabrina AM Curcio 1, Rosanna Colao 1, Paola Piscopo 1, Maura Gallo 1, Maria Anfossi 1, Francesca Frangipane 1, Alessandra Clodomiro 1, Maria Mirabelli 1, Franca Vasso 1, Chiara Cupidi 1, Giusi Torchia 1, Raffaele Di Lorenzo 1, Paola Mandich 1, Annamaria Confaloni 1, Raffaele G Maletta 1, Amalia C Bruni 1,
PMCID: PMC4456653  PMID: 25948718

Abstract

Objective:

To report, for the first time, a large autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (AD) family in which the APP A713T mutation is present in the homozygous and heterozygous state. To date, the mutation has been reported as dominant, and in the heterozygous state associated with familial AD and cerebrovascular lesions.

Methods:

The family described here has been genealogically reconstructed over 6 generations dating back to the 19th century. Plasma β-amyloid peptide was measured. Sequencing of causative AD genes was performed.

Results:

Twenty-one individuals, all but 1 born from 2 consanguineous unions, were studied: 8 were described as affected through history, 5 were studied clinically and genetically, and 8 were asymptomatic at-risk subjects. The A713T mutation was detected in the homozygous state in 3 patients and in the heterozygous state in 8 subjects (6 asymptomatic and 2 affected).

Conclusions:

Our findings, also supported by the β-amyloid plasma assay, confirm (1) the pathogenic role of the APP A713T mutation, (2) the specific phenotype (AD with cerebrovascular lesions) associated with this mutation, and (3) the large span of age at onset, not influenced by APOE, TOMM40, and TREM2 genes. No substantial differences concerning clinical phenotype were evidenced between heterozygous and homozygous patients, in line with the classic definition of dominance. Therefore, in this study, AD followed the classic definition of a dominant disease, contrary to that reported in a previously described AD family with recessive APP mutation. This confirms that genetic AD may be considered a disease with dominant and recessive traits of inheritance.


Heterozygous mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene are associated with different phenotypes, such as autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease (AD),13 cerebral amyloid angiopathy,4 autosomal dominant early-onset AD with cerebral amyloid angiopathy,5 and hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis.6 Two recessive mutations, causing disease in the homozygous state, have also been identified7,8 in 2 different families. Heterozygous APP mutations affecting codons from 714 to 717 alter γ-secretase cleavage causing an increase of the β-amyloid (Aβ)42/Aβ40 ratio.9,10 In AD families, Aβ42 elevated levels have been reported among symptomatic carriers of presenilin mutations,11 and Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio levels were higher in unaffected familial AD mutation carriers compared with the unaffected individuals without mutation belonging to the same AD families.12 First-degree relatives of patients with late-onset AD without any known mutations have also been found to have an increase of plasma Aβ42.13 The APP A713T mutation has been reported with dominant inheritance and in heterozygosis, associated with familial AD with both early and late onset and cerebrovascular lesions (CVLs).5,14,15 All Italian patients with the A713T mutation5,15 shared a common DNA haplotype, suggesting that this mutation originated from a putative ancestor,16 probably living centuries ago in Calabria (Southern Italy), where a high prevalence of this mutation has been observed.16

We report the A713T mutation, for the first time to our knowledge, both in homozygosis and heterozygosis in a family (not genealogically related to the previously described families) affected by autosomal dominant AD with CVLs.

METHODS

Pedigree reconstruction and family members.

The pedigree of the PEC family has been reconstructed over 6 generations from the present time back to the 19th century (subject II-2 was born in the year 1823) through the systematic collection of data from municipal documents (births, deaths, and marriage acts since 1809).

To avoid bias in the collection of data, we followed apparently unaffected as well as affected branches of the pedigree to verify consanguinities at any level. Any subject transitively linked with the proband(s) by ascent, descent, or marriage relationship was considered as belonging to the pedigree. A genealogical search was conducted in a village in Calabria (Car). The data obtained were stored in a database containing thousands of subjects linked through transitive filiation-marriage relationships and maintained and updated at the Regional Neurogenetic Centre since 1973.

Forty-nine people were identified; among them, 21 subjects (13 males, 8 females) over the last 3 generations were identified as at risk or affected by dementia. Twenty of these 21 individuals were born from 2 consanguineous unions (subjects 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the IV generation) (figure 1). Eight persons were reported to be affected by dementia through history (5 males, 3 females), and 5 were studied clinically and genetically (5 males, average age at onset 70.2 ± 5.2 years, range 62–76 years). Eight asymptomatic at-risk subjects (3 males, 5 females, average current age 56.4 ± 7.3 years, range 47–66 years) were also clinically and genetically investigated (figure 1).

Figure 1. Pedigree of the PEC family.

Figure 1

Double bars represent consanguineous union; diagonal lines indicate deceased family members.

Control subjects.

A control group, comprising 200 cognitively healthy controls (mean age 60.9 ± 8.72 years; Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score 28 ± 3.7) and 200 unrelated patients with AD who had a family history of dementia (mean onset age 71.9 ± 7.4 years) belonging to the Calabrian population, was screened to exclude that the APP A713T variation was a common polymorphism.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participating family members, or their legal guardians, and all participating control group subjects gave written informed consent to be enrolled in the study.

Clinical assessment.

All living patients underwent a detailed clinical assessment involving medical history, physical, and routine laboratory examinations, including serum folate, vitamin B12, thyroid function, and syphilis serology. Activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were assessed in all patients. Vascular risk factors such as hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, cardiomyopathy, and diabetes were also systematically ascertained.

A detailed neuropsychological battery validated in previous studies was used.17 The battery consisted of an extensive assessment of all cognitive functions. The NINCDS-ADRDA (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association),18 McKeith,19 Lund-Manchester group criteria,20 and NINDS-AIREN (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences) criteria21 were used to make differential diagnosis. The Hachinski Ischemic Score (HIS) was measured22 in each case.

Brain morphologic and functional imaging (CT-MRI-SPECT, fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET) were performed in available affected subjects.

Genetic analyses.

Genetic screening was conducted in all the available family members (5 affected and 8 asymptomatic at-risk subjects). DNA was extracted from peripheral leukocytes using standard phenol-chloroform procedures. Coding exons312 of presenilin 1 (PSEN1) and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) genes and exons 15–18 of the APP gene were amplified using previously described primers.3,23,24 Bidirectional sequencing was performed on the ABI3130 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using the Big Dye kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). A second internal set of primers was designed by Primer Premier software (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA), to amplify exon 17 of APP gene, to rule out the possibility that a primer binding site polymorphism could have prevented the amplification of normal alleles and thereby given a false indication of homozygosity. The potential functional impact of the A713T mutation was predicted using Polymorphism Phenotyping 2 (PolyPhen-2) (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/), sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT) (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_enst_submit.html), and MutationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/).

The APOE genotype was assessed as previously described.25 The TOMM40 rs10524523 genotype was evaluated using specific primers and according to previously reported methods.26 The TREM2 rs75932628 (R47H) was evaluated using specific primers designed using Primer Premier software (Premier Biosoft) (primer sequences available on request). Bidirectional sequencing was performed as already described above for the APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 genes.

Biochemical assay.

Plasma samples from 12 available family members were collected and frozen. Of these, 10 were mutation carriers (2 homozygotes and 8 heterozygotes); an additional 2 were not mutated and were born from a heterozygous mutation carrier. An aliquot of each plasma sample was sent on dry ice to the ISS laboratory in Rome for the plasma Aβ peptide dosage. Aβ40 and Aβ42 were measured using a sandwich ELISA by the β-Amyloid (1-40) JP 27713 kit from IBL and the INNOTEST β-Amyloid (1-42) kit from Innogenetics. Each sample was assayed in duplicate and all the samples were run on a single plate.

RESULTS

Genetic results.

Mutations in the PSEN1 and PSEN2 genes were excluded in all affected subjects; sequencing of the APP gene exon 17 revealed the previously reported A713T mutation (275329G>A, GenBank accession number D87675.1)5,14 in 11 subjects (6 asymptomatic and 5 affected) and was excluded in 2 at-risk relatives (asymptomatic subjects VI-7 and VI-8, females, current age 57 and 63 years) (figure 1). The mutation was found in the homozygous state in 3 patients (patients V-2, V-10, V-17, males, onset age 76, 70, and 70 years, respectively), heterozygous in 2 patients (patients V-5 and V-7, males, onset age 62 and 73 years, respectively), and in 6 asymptomatic at-risk individuals (3 males, 3 females, average current age 55.2 ± 8.0 years, range 47–66 years) (figure 1). In silico analyses predicted that the mutation is functionally “probably damaging” (PolyPhen-2 score of 1.000), “damaging” (SIFT score of 0.00), and “disease causing” (MutationTaster, probability value close to 1 indicates a high “security” of the prediction), respectively.

The APP variation was absent in the control group, comprising 800 chromosomes, belonging to Calabrian population.

APOE, TOMM40 rs10524523, and TREM2 rs75932628 genotypes are showed in table e-1 on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org.

Biochemical results.

The comparison of plasma Aβ levels of asymptomatic mutation carriers (ASMCs) and non–mutation carriers (NMCs) belonging to the family showed that in ASMCs: (1) Aβ40 plasma levels were significantly lower (p < 0.05); (2) Aβ42 plasma levels were higher, although not significantly; and (3) the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was significantly higher (p < 0.05) (table 1).

Table 1.

Plasma biomarker values in unaffected NMCs belonging to the family compared with ASMCs and AMCs

graphic file with name NEUROLOGY2014632174TT1.jpg

Comparing NMCs and affected (both homozygotes and heterozygotes) mutation carriers (AMCs), the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was found to be significantly higher in the whole group of AMCs (p < 0.05) (table 1). Homozygous and heterozygous AMCs had no significant difference in plasma levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, or Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (table 1), thus showing the lack of a “dose effect” of the mutation.

Comparing the mean Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio according to the genotype in NMCs, ASMCs, and AMCs, we found a trend toward an increase of the ratio in NMCs and ASMCs, and a decreased ratio in AMCs compared with ASMCs (figure 2).

Figure 2. Scatterplot.

Figure 2

The plot indicates Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio according to genotype in non–mutation carriers (NMCs), asymptomatic heterozygous mutation carriers (ASMCs), and affected mutation carriers (AMCs) belonging to the family.

Main clinical and neuroimaging features of subjects carrying the mutation.

Homozygous patients.

V-2.

Patient V-2, a male, showed disease onset at age 76 years with memory disorder, followed by disorientation to time and place and progressive loss of independence (figure 1). At that time, he scored 23 of 30 on the MMSE, insight was present, and neurologic examination was normal. HIS measured 3. He was successively lost at follow-up, and died at 84 years of bowel cancer.

V-17.

This male patient, still living, aged 84 years, showed the first signs of disease at age 70 years. At that time, he had deficits in episodic memory, but awareness was referred to as preserved. After 7 years, he was disoriented to time, showed prosopagnosia, and progressively lost his independence. Currently, he is markedly apathetic and repeatedly picks up rubbish on the streets and brings it home during the day. MMSE score is 14.5/30; ADL 5/6, and IADL 0. Brain functional and morphologic imaging is shown in figure 3.

Figure 3. Morphologic and functional brain imaging of APP mutation homozygous and heterozygous affected carriers.

Figure 3

(A) Heterozygous patient. (Left) SPECT examination after 25 years from onset: fronto-parieto-temporal hypoperfusion. (Right) MRI FLAIR sequence 27 years after onset: severe atrophy is prevalent in parieto-temporal cortices and cerebrovascular lesions in the cortex. (B) Homozygous patient. (Left) SPECT examination after 14 years from onset: fronto-parieto-temporal hypoperfusion. (Right) T2-weighted MRI and FLAIR sequence 9 years after onset: cortical atrophy in fronto-parieto-temporal regions and cerebrovascular lesions. (C) Heterozygous patient. (Left) SPECT examination in an amnesic mild cognitive impairment case: fronto-parieto-temporal hypoperfusion. FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.

V-10.

Memory disturbances and attention were the main symptoms developed by this male at age 70 years. The course of the disease worsened with behavioral problems, such as apathy and verbal aggressiveness toward his family. At the age of 73 years, MMSE score was 18.3/30, ADL 6/6, and IADL 5/5. Neurologic examination was unremarkable. HIS was 0. He is currently 75 years old. CT scan evidenced diffuse cortical atrophy, which was more pronounced in parietal posterior areas, and hypodensities in the white matter. FDG-PET showed a large area of hypoperfusion, which was asymmetric and prevalent in the left parietal and temporomesial cortex. Left lingual gyrus was more compromised.

Heterozygous patients.

V-5.

He is currently 89 years old. Disease onset was at 62 years with memory loss; after 2 to 3 years he showed prosopagnosia and spatial-temporal disorientation (figure 1). At 75 years, changes of personality were evident; he became easily irritable and emotionally flattened. After 1 year, MMSE score was 23.7/30, ADL 6/6, and IADL 3/5. He was unable to make small purchases, use the telephone, and manage money or his personal therapy. Neurologic examination was normal and HIS was 2. Neuropsychological assessment evidenced mild memory impairment in short-term verbal skills and slight deficit in logical-deductive reasoning. A SPECT examination evidenced a slight parieto-temporal hypoperfusion. Over time, the patient became stubborn and capricious; he had strange behavior and was oppositive toward his wife, arguing with her continuously. At age 85, he was still able to sleep at home alone and during the day he relied on his daughters for home management. MMSE score was 23.4/30. At 87 years, he began to neglect personal hygiene and he worsened in behavioral disinhibition, urinating outdoors, regardless of the presence of people, and collecting waste from rubbish bins and taking it home. MRI is shown in figure 3. Two years later, he was moriatic, disoriented to time and space, and understood only simple verbal messages. He obtained the following scores: MMSE 20.4/30, IADL 1/5, and ADL 3/6. He was able to use cutlery, did not need help to get out of bed, and controlled sphincters.

V-7.

He developed memory loss at 73 years. After 4 years, he still had an amnesic mild cognitive impairment (MMSE score 26.7; Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5; visuoconstructional abilities and Rey figure copy are impaired). ADL are unimpaired, neurologic examination is normal, and HIS = 2. SPECT examination is shown in figure 3.

Heterozygous asymptomatic subjects.

All of these subjects (n = 6) are currently younger than the average age at onset of patients, thus they cannot be considered “escapees”; only one, VI-6, manifested signs of depression (figure 1).

DISCUSSION

We report here, to our knowledge for the first time, 3 individuals affected by autosomal dominant AD, carrying the APP A713T mutation in the homozygous state. They were born to consanguineous parents and belong to a pedigree that also includes 2 affected and 6 at-risk heterozygous carriers of the same mutation. A false indication of homozygosity was ruled out using 2 sets of primers for APP gene exon 17 in the genetic sequencing analysis to exclude the remote possibility that a primer binding site polymorphism could have prevented the amplification of the normal allele. Moreover, the genealogical reconstruction showed that all the homozygous patients were born from consanguineous parents (IV-1 and IV-2, second cousins; IV-3 and IV-4, first cousins); it is clear, indeed, that both parents of the 3 homozygous patients were obligate mutation carriers. On these bases, the homozygosity of the 3 patients was unquestionably verified.

We confirmed that the APP A713T variant is a mutation (and not a common polymorphism), given that it was absent in a control group comprising 400 subjects belonging to the Calabrian population. However, the control sample size was not sufficiently large enough to exclude the variation as a very rare polymorphism.

Regarding the pathogenic nature of the APP A713T variant, in silico analyses predicted that the mutation is functionally “damaging” and “disease causing.” Furthermore, in this family, segregation of the mutation with disease is disclosed, given that all affected subjects carry the mutation in homozygous or in heterozygous state and given that heterozygous asymptomatic subjects are younger than the average age at onset of patients, thus they cannot be considered “escapees.” Moreover, comparing our data with findings from other APP mutations, A713T results in a simultaneous decrease of Aβ40 and increase of Aβ42 plasma levels in ASMCs (table 1), similar to that observed for the pathogenic APP T714I mutation,9 in line with evidence that mutations at codon 714 appear to primarily affect γ40-cleavage and cause a decreased secretion of Aβ40.10 Our data from plasma show that the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio increased in ASMCs compared with NMCs, as previously reported,12 and then it decreases in AMCs (figure 2). The Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was approximately 2-fold higher in the group of AMCs (p < 0.05) compared with the group of NMCs, as previously demonstrated in one patient with AD carrying the APP I716V mutation.27 These observations are consistent with findings published in other longitudinal studies, suggesting that plasma levels of Aβ peptides increase in the preclinical phase of AD, successively declining with the progression of clinical dementia, reflecting the deposition of Aβ peptides in the brain.2833

No substantial differences concerning clinical phenotype and course were evidenced comparing heterozygous and homozygous patients (table e-2). In these affected persons, homozygosity for the APP A713T mutation does not aggravate the clinical picture of the disease, which is in line with the classic definition of dominance. This evidence is supported by the lack of a “dose effect” of the mutation in plasma levels of Aβ peptides. Of note is the very long course in both genotypes.

Our study presents the following limitations regarding the biochemical results in plasma: (1) it is possible that the small number of the APP A713T mutation carriers could have influenced the significance of the data, despite that these subjects with the mutation are among very few in the world; (2) the NMC subjects in this study included only 2 persons, given that we chose the available unaffected individuals without the mutation belonging to the present family; and (3) in this study, it was not possible to perform serial measurements of Aβ peptides before the onset and during disease progression, as is recommended in autosomal dominant AD families with ASMCs. Indeed, the diagnostic role of plasma as biomarker in these subjects remains to be further verified; we were unable for several reasons to measure the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in the CSF, largely recognized as the true biomarker.3436

In conclusion, we report for the first time a large autosomal dominant AD family in which a mutation in a causative gene is present in the homozygous and heterozygous state. Our findings confirm the pathogenic role of the APP A713T mutation and the large span of onset, already reported to range from 52 to 82 years,5,15 and not influenced by APOE, TOMM40 rs10524523, and TREM2 rs75932628 genotype, reported to be significantly associated with the risk of AD37,38 (table e-1). It is likely that this large span of onset and disease course is attributable to a specific genetic background of modifier genes and/or to epigenetic effect, which in the future would be useful to investigate.

The phenotype of the PEC family, associated with this mutation, and showing AD with CVLs (evident at neuroimaging, but without neurologic signs), is not different from that of other affected subjects whom we previously described, probably being a distinctive feature, at least in the Calabrian population.16 Although neither in-depth genealogical reconstruction nor haplotype analysis were performed in the APP mutation carriers belonging to this pedigree, we hypothesize that they are related to families previously described and probably originated from the same common ancestor before the 19th century.16

In this study, AD behaves as a real dominant disease, similar to that reported for the rare homozygous CADASIL patients39,40 and differently from that reported in the AD family with the recessive APP A673V mutation,7 which causes disease only in the homozygous state, whereas heterozygous carriers were unaffected, consistent with a recessive trait of inheritance. All these data confirm that genetic AD may be considered a disease with dominant and recessive traits of inheritance, thus demonstrating the importance to search for recessive AD loci, for instance by analyzing homozygosity in consanguineous families and inbred populations.

Our biochemical data on Aβ peptide levels in plasma, despite the limitations mentioned above, could be considered in further research to better define their real diagnostic validity in the assessment of individuals at risk of developing AD. Identification of the APP A713T mutation in patients with this specific phenotype and with such a large span of age at onset further suggests that genetic epidemiology in large cohorts of familial late-onset AD with CVLs would increase the probability of identifying APP mutations that are still underestimated.

Supplementary Material

Data Supplement

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank all subjects and families who participated in the study, and the Associazione per la Ricerca Neurogenetica ONLUS Lamezia Terme for invaluable help in assisting persons and families.

GLOSSARY

β-amyloid

AD

Alzheimer disease

ADL

activities of daily living

AMC

affected mutation carrier

APP

amyloid precursor protein

ASMC

asymptomatic mutation carrier

CVL

cerebrovascular lesion

FDG

fluorodeoxyglucose

HIS

Hachinski Ischemic Score

IADL

instrumental activities of daily living

MMSE

Mini-Mental State Examination

NMC

non–mutation carrier

PolyPhen-2

Polymorphism Phenotyping 2

PSEN1

presenilin 1

PSEN2

presenilin 2

SIFT

sorting intolerant from tolerant

Footnotes

Supplemental data at Neurology.org

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

M.E. Conidi: design and conceptualization of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript. L. Bernardi: design and conceptualization of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript. G. Puccio: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. N. Smirne: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. M.G. Muraca: acquisition and analysis of data. S.A.M. Curcio: acquisition of data. R. Colao: acquisition of data. P. Piscopo: analysis and interpretation of data. M. Gallo: analysis of data. M. Anfossi: analysis of data. F. Frangipane: acquisition of data. A. Clodomiro: acquisition of data. M. Mirabelli: acquisition of data. F. Vasso: analysis of data. C. Cupidi: acquisition of data. G. Torchia: acquisition of data. R. Di Lorenzo: acquisition of data. P. Mandich: acquisition of data. A. Confaloni: design and conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of data. R.G. Maletta: acquisition of data. A.C. Bruni: design and conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the manuscript.

STUDY FUNDING

No targeted funding reported.

DISCLOSURE

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cruts M, Theuns J, Van Broeckhoven C. Locus-specific mutation databases for neurodegenerative brain diseases. Hum Mutat 2012;33:1340–1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rovelet-Lecrux A, Hannequin D, Raux G, et al. APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat Genet 2006;38:24–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goate A, Chartier-Harlin MC, Mullan M, et al. Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer's disease. Nature 1991;349:704–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hendriks L, Van Broeckhoven C. A beta A4 amyloid precursor protein gene and Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Biochem 1996;237:6–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rossi G, Giaccone G, Maletta R, et al. A family with Alzheimer disease and strokes associated with A713T mutation of the APP gene. Neurology 2004;63:910–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maat-Schieman ML, van Duinen SG, Bornebroek M, Haan J, Roos RA. Hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type (HCHWA-D): II: a review of histopathological aspects. Brain Pathol 1996;6:115–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Di Fede G, Catania M, Morbin M, et al. A recessive mutation in the APP gene with dominant-negative effect on amyloidogenesis. Science 2009;323:1473–1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tomiyama T, Nagata T, Shimada H, et al. A new amyloid beta variant favoring oligomerization in Alzheimer's-type dementia. Ann Neurol 2008;63:377–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kumar-Singh S, De Jonghe C, Cruts M, et al. Nonfibrillar diffuse amyloid deposition due to a gamma(42)-secretase site mutation points to an essential role for N-truncated A beta(42) in Alzheimer's disease. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:2589–2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Jonghe C, Esselens C, Kumar-Singh S, et al. Pathogenic APP mutations near the gamma-secretase cleavage site differentially affect Abeta secretion and APP C-terminal fragment stability. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:1665–1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scheuner D, Eckman C, Jensen M, et al. Secreted amyloid beta-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer's disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med 1996;2:864–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ringman JM, Younkin SG, Pratico D, et al. Biochemical markers in persons with preclinical familial Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2008;71:85–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ertekin-Taner N, Younkin LH, Yager DM, et al. Plasma amyloid beta protein is elevated in late-onset Alzheimer disease families. Neurology 2008;70:596–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Armstrong J, Boada M, Rey MJ, Vidal N, Ferrer I. Familial Alzheimer disease associated with A713T mutation in APP. Neurosci Lett 2004;370:241–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bernardi L, Geracitano S, Colao R, et al. AbetaPP A713T mutation in late onset Alzheimer's disease with cerebrovascular lesions. J Alzheimers Dis 2009;17:383–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bernardi L, Geracitano S, Colao R, et al. Late onset Alzheimer's disease with cerebrovascular lesions as a distinctive phenotype of the AβPP A713T mutation in Southern Italy. In: Handbook of Imaging the Alzheimer Brain (Advances in Alzheimer's Disease). Washington, DC: IOS Press; 2011:689. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bernardi L, Maletta RG, Tomaino C, et al. The effects of APOE and tau gene variability on risk of frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Aging 2006;27:702–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, et al. Consensus Guidelines International Workshop for the clinical and pathological diagnosis of dementia with Lewy body disease (DLB): report of the Consortium on DLB. Neurology 1996;47:1113–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brun A, Englund B, Gustafson L, et al. Consensus statement: clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINCSDS-AIREN International Work Group. Neurology 1993;43:250–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, et al. Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 1975;32:632–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hutton M, Busfield F, Wragg M, et al. Complete analysis of the presenilin 1 gene in early onset Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport 1996;7:801–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cruts M, van Duijn CM, Backhovens H, et al. Estimation of the genetic contribution of presenilin-1 and -2 mutations in a population-based study of presenile Alzheimer disease. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:43–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hixson JE, Vernier DT. Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with HhaI. J Lipid Res 1990;31:545–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bernardi L, Gallo M, Anfossi M, et al. Role of TOMM40 rs10524523 polymorphism in onset of Alzheimer's disease caused by the PSEN1 M146L mutation. J Alzheimers Dis 2013;37:285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eckman CB, Mehta ND, Crook R, et al. A new pathogenic mutation in the APP gene (I716V) increases the relative proportion of A beta 42(43). Hum Mol Genet 1997;6:2087–2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prasher VP, Sajith SG, Mehta P, Zigman WB, Schupf N. Plasma beta-amyloid and duration of Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;25:202–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kawarabayashi T, Younkin LH, Saido TC, Shoji M, Ashe KH, Younkin SG. Age-dependent changes in brain, CSF, and plasma amyloid (beta) protein in the Tg2576 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 2001;21:372–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mayeux R, Honig LS, Tang MX, et al. Plasma A[beta]40 and A[beta]42 and Alzheimer's disease: relation to age, mortality, and risk. Neurology 2003;61:1185–1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mehta PD, Pirttilä T, Mehta SP, Sersen EA, Aisen PS, Wisniewski HM. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of amyloid beta proteins 1-40 and 1-42 in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2000;57:100–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Park L, Zhou P, Koizumi K, et al. Brain and circulating levels of Aβ1-40 differentially contribute to vasomotor dysfunction in the mouse brain. Stroke 2013;44:198–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gomis M, Sobrino T, Ois A, et al. Plasma beta-amyloid 1-40 is associated with the diffuse small vessel disease subtype. Stroke 2009;40:3197–3201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Andreasen N, Minthon L, Davidsson P, et al. Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice. Arch Neurol 2001;58:373–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bouwman FH, van der Flier WM, Schoonenboom NS, et al. Longitudinal changes of CSF biomarkers in memory clinic patients. Neurology 2007;69:1006–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Toledo JB, Brettschneider J, Grossman M, et al. CSF biomarkers cutoffs: the importance of coincident neuropathological diseases. Acta Neuropathol 2012;124:23–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 2013;368:117–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 2013;368:107–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ragno M, Pianese L, Morroni M, et al. “CADASIL coma” in an Italian homozygous CADASIL patient: comparison with clinical and MRI findings in age-matched heterozygous patients with the same G528C NOTCH3 mutation. Neurol Sci 2013;34:1947–1953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vinciguerra C, Rufa A, Bianchi S, et al. Homozygosity and severity of phenotypic presentation in a CADASIL family. Neurol Sci 2014;35:91–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Supplement

Articles from Neurology are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology

RESOURCES