Abstract
Dickeya dianthicola is one of the causative agents of soft rot and blackleg diseases, which are currently identified in European countries in a wide range of crops. Here, we report the draft genome sequence of D. dianthicola strain RNS04.9, which was isolated from a potato plant with blackleg symptoms in 2004.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Pectinolytic bacteria of the genera Pectobacterium and Dickeya are causative agents of soft rot and blackleg diseases that affect a wide range of field crops and ornamental plants (1–5). In Europe, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dianthicola, and Dickeya solani are the main pectinolytic pathogens of potato in the field stage or during storage (6–8). Two Dickeya species emerged recently: D. dianthicola in the 1970s and D. solani in the 2000s (9). The pathogens may propagate from tubers to stems or leaves and reciprocally from aerial parts to progeny tubers (10–13).
Our team has already reported the genome sequences of other blackleg and soft rot diseases agents, P. atrosepticum strain CFBP6276 (14) and D. solani strain PRI3337 (15, 16). D. dianthicola strain RNS04.9 was isolated and characterized in 2004 from a potato plant with blackleg symptom sampled in a French field during the epidemiological annual survey monitored by the FN3PT/RD3PT. This strain has been investigated in several former studies (17–19) and used to develop a valuable greenhouse pathosystem, which allowed the assessment of a biocontrol strategy (20).
Genomic DNA of D. dianthicola RNS04.9 was subjected to next-generation Illumina HiSeq 2000 version 3 technology. Two libraries were constructed: a paired-end library with a fragment size of 150 to 500 bp and a shotgun long-jumping-distance mate-pair library with an insert size of 8,000 bp. Sequencing of the libraries was carried out using a 2 × 100 bp paired-end read module by Eurofins Genomics. Assembly was performed by CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.5 (from CLCbio). Sequence reads were trimmed based on quality (threshold 0.05), and minimum size (above 60 nucleotides). Scaffolding of the contig was processed using SSPACE basic version 2.0 (21). A total of 46 contigs were generated by de novo assembly and clustered in 2 scaffolds. The first scaffold (3,366,760 bp) comprised 35 contigs, the 11 remaining ones being included in the second scaffold (1,343,990 bp). The in silico closure of some gaps was carried out by mapping (read length of 0.9 and similarity of 0.95) the mate-pair reads on each of the 5-kbp contig ends. Following this treatment, 36 gaps were elucidated. Then, the collected reads were used for de novo local assembling (read length of 0.5 and similarity of 0.8). This allowed the generation of one scaffold with 10 gaps, from 28 bp to 3,271 bp in size. Some gaps were resolved by Sanger sequencing of PCR amplicons.
At the end, the genome sequence of D. dianthicola strain RNS04.9 revealed a circular chromosome consisting of 4,721,506 bp and comprised 7 contigs. No plasmid was detected. The G+C content was ~56%. Gene prediction using the RAST version 4.0 automated pipeline (22, 23) revealed the presence of 4,351 coding sequences and 97 RNA-assimilated regions. These features are in accordance with other data of the Dickeya spp. genomes and draft genomes that are available in public databases.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This draft genome sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number APVF00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, APVF01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS, France), Saclay Plant Sciences LABEX (ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS and ANR-11-IDEX-0003-02), the Fédération Nationale des Producteurs de Plants de Pomme de Terre (FN3PT/RD3PT), and the Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (ANRT-CIFRE no. 1282/2011) for their financial support.
Y.R.D.E. also thanks Yves Le Hingrat (FN3PT) and Yves Dessaux (CNRS) for editing.
Footnotes
Citation Raoul des Essarts Y, Mondy S, Hélias V, Faure D. 2015. Genome sequence of the potato plant pathogen Dickeya dianthicola strain RNS04.9. Genome Announc 3(3):e00581-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00581-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gardan L, Gouy C, Christen R, Samson R. 2003. Elevation of three subspecies of Pectobacterium carotovorum to species level: Pectobacterium atrosepticum sp. nov., Pectobacterium betavasculorum sp. nov. and Pectobacterium wasabiae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:381–391. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02423-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ma B, Hibbing ME, Kim H-S, Reedy RM, Yedidia I, Breuer J, Breuer J, Glasner JD, Perna NT, Kelman A, Charkowski AO. 2007. Host range and molecular phylogenies of the soft rot enterobacterial genera Pectobacterium and Dickeya. Phytopathology 97:1150–1163. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-9-1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Perombelon MCM, Kelman A. 1980. Ecology of the soft rot erwinias. Annu Rev Phytopathol 18:361–387. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.002045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pérombelon MCM. 1992. Potato blackleg: epidemiology, host-pathogen interaction and control. Neth J Plant Pathol 98:135–146. doi: 10.1007/BF01974480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Samson R, Legendre JB, Christen R, Fischer-Le Saux M, Achouak W, Gardan L. 2005. Transfer of Pectobacterium chrysanthemi (Burkholder et al. 1953) Brenner et al. 1973 and Brenneria paradisiaca to the genus Dickeya gen. nov. as Dickeya chrysanthemi comb. nov. and Dickeya paradisiaca comb. nov. and delineation of four novel species, Dickeya dadantii sp. nov., Dickeya dianthicola sp. nov., Dickeya dieffenbachiae sp. nov. and Dickeya zeae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1415–1427. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02791-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hauben L, Moore ER, Vauterin L, Steenackers M, Mergaert J, Verdonck L, Swings J. 1998. Phylogenetic position of phytopathogens within the Enterobacteriaceae. Syst Appl Microbiol 21:384–397. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(98)80048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Van der Wolf JM, Nijhuis EH, Kowalewska MJ, Saddler GS, Parkinson N, Elphinstone JG, Pritchard L, Toth IK, Lojkowska E, Potrykus M, Waleron M, de Vos P, Cleenwerck I, Pirhonen M, Garlant L, Hélias V, Pothier JF, Pflüger V, Duffy B, Tsror L, Manulis S. 2014. Dickeya solani sp. nov., a pectinolytic plant-pathogenic bacterium isolated from potato (Solanum tuberosum). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:768–774. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.052944-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Van der Wolf JM, De Boer SH. 2007. Bacterial pathogens of potato, p 595–617. In Vreugdenhil D, Bradshaw J, Gebhardt C, Govers F, Mackerron DKL, Taylor MA, Ross HA (ed), Potato biology and biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Toth IK, van der Wolf JM, Saddler G, Lojkowska E, Hélias V, Pirhonen M, Tsror Lahkim L, Elphinstone JG. 2011. Dickeya species: an emerging problem for potato production in Europe: Dickeya spp. on potato in Europe. Plant Pathol 60:385–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02427.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Czajkowski R, Pérombelon MCM, van Veen JA, van der Wolf JM. 2011. Control of blackleg and tuber soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya species: a review. Plant Pathol 60:999–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02470.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Czajkowski R, Grabe GJ, van der Wolf JM. 2009. Distribution of Dickeya spp. and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum in naturally infected seed potatoes. Eur J Plant Pathol 125:263–275. doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9480-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Czajkowski R, de Boer WJ, van Veen JA, van der Wolf JM. 2010. Downward vascular translocation of a green fluorescent protein-tagged strain of Dickeya sp.(biovar 3) from stem and leaf inoculation sites on potato. Phytopathology 100:1128–1137. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-0093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Czajkowski R, de Boer WJ, Velvis H, van der Wolf JM. 2010. Systemic colonization of potato plants by a soilborne, green fluorescent protein-tagged strain of Dickeya sp. biovar 3. Phytopathology 100:134–142. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-100-2-0134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kwasiborski A, Mondy S, Beury-Cirou A, Faure D. 2013. Genome sequence of the Pectobacterium atrosepticum strain cfbp6276, causing blackleg and soft rot diseases on potato plants and tubers. Genome Announc 1(3):e00374-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00374-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khayi S, Mondy S, Beury-Cirou A, Moumni M, Helias V, Faure D. 2014. Genome sequence of the emerging plant pathogen Dickeya solani strain RNS 08.23.3.1A. Genome Announc 2(1):e01270-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01270-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pédron J, Mondy S, des Essarts YR, Van Gijsegem F, Faure D. 2014. Genomic and metabolic comparison with Dickeya dadantii 3937 reveals the emerging Dickeya solani potato pathogen to display distinctive metabolic activities and T5SS/T6SS-related toxin repertoire. BMC Genomics 15:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hélias V, Hamon P, Huchet E, Wolf JVD, Andrivon D. 2012. Two new effective semiselective crystal violet pectate media for isolation of Pectobacterium and Dickeya. Plant Pathol 61:339–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02508.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crépin A, Barbey C, Beury-Cirou A, Hélias V, Taupin L, Reverchon S, Nasser W, Faure D, Dufour A, Orange N, Feuilloley M, Heurlier K, Burini J-F, Latour X. 2012. Quorum sensing signaling molecules produced by reference and emerging soft-rot bacteria (Dickeya and Pectobacterium spp.). PLoS One 7:e35176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crépin A, Beury-Cirou A, Barbey C, Farmer C, Hélias V, Burini J-F, Faure D, Latour X. 2012. N-Acyl homoserine lactones in diverse Pectobacterium and Dickeya plant pathogens: diversity, abundance, and involvement in virulence. Sensors 12:3484–3497. doi: 10.3390/s120303484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cigna J, Raoul des Essarts Y, Mondy S, Hélias V, Beury-Cirou A, Faure D. 2015. Draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains PA4C2 and PA3G8 and Pseudomonas putida PA14H7, three biocontrol bacteria against Dickeya phytopathogens. Genome Announc 3(1):e01503–14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01503-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]