Abstract
Background
Limited evidence suggests that vitamin K may have a beneficial role in glucose homeostasis. No observational data exist on the associations between vitamin K intake and insulin sensitivity.
Objective
The aim was to examine associations between vitamin K intake and measures of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status in men and women, aged 26-81 y.
Design
We assessed the cross-sectional associations between self-reported phylloquinone (vitamin K1) intake and insulin sensitivity, and with glycemic status in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Dietary and supplemental phylloquinone intakes were assessed by food-frequency questionnaire. Insulin sensitivity was measured by fasting and 2-h post oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) insulin, the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120). Glycemic status was assessed by fasting and 2-h post OGTT glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
Results
Higher phylloquinone intake was associated with greater insulin sensitivity and glycemic status, as measured by 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose, and ISI0,120, after adjustment for age, sex, waist circumference, lifestyle characteristics and diet quality (2-h post OGTT insulin: lowest vs. highest quintile, 81.0 vs. 72.7 μU/mL, P for trend = 0.003; ISI0,120: 26.3 vs. 27.3 mg·L2/mmol·mU·min, P for trend = 0.01; 2-h post OGTT glucose: 106.3 vs. 101.9 mg/dL, P for trend = 0.01). Phylloquinone intake was not associated with fasting insulin and glucose concentrations, HOMA-IR and HbA1c.
Conclusions
Our findings support a potential beneficial role for phylloquinone in glucose homeostasis in adult men and women.
Keywords: Insulin sensitivity, glycemic status, vitamin K, phylloquinone, Framingham Offspring Cohort
INTRODUCTION
Recent evidence suggests a potential beneficial role of vitamin K in glucose homeostasis (1-3). The major form of vitamin K in the North American diet is phylloquinone (vitamin K1), which is concentrated in green vegetables and certain plant oils (4). Rats fed a low phylloquinone diet had higher glucose and delayed acute insulin response to intravenous glucose infusion compared with those fed a high phylloquinone diet (1). In clinical studies of young Japanese healthy men, short-term supplementation of vitamin K improved acute insulin response and glucose disposal in peripheral tissues among those with low baseline vitamin K status (2, 3). Although these findings are suggestive, available data on the role of vitamin K in glucose metabolism are limited, and the potential mechanism behind the association between vitamin K and glucose homeostasis is uncertain. Vitamin K is a cofactor specific to the formation of γ-carboxyglutamyl residues in certain proteins including the coagulation factors and the bone formation protein, osteocalcin. Based on data from the osteocalcin knockout mouse model, osteocalcin may be involved in insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion (5). The role of the vitamin K-dependent carboxylation of osteocalcin in glucose homeostasis is not known.
Currently, there are no published data on the associations between phylloquinone intake and measures of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status in a community-based sample. We examined the cross-sectional associations between phylloquinone intake and both insulin sensitivity and glycemic status, as measured by fasting and 2-h post oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) insulin and glucose concentrations, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120) in men and women who participated in the Framingham Offspring Study. We hypothesized that higher phylloquinone intake is associated with greater insulin sensitivity and improved glycemic status in adult men and women.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subject
The Framingham Offspring Study is a longitudinal, community-based study of cardiovascular disease in the children of the participants in the original Framingham Heart Study cohort and their spouses (6). In 1971, 5135 participants were enrolled into the study (7). During examination cycle 5 (1991-1995), 3799 participants underwent an extensive examination, including comprehensive questionnaires, anthropometric measures, blood chemistries, and a physical examination with assessment of cardiovascular and other risk factors by trained clinical personnel. Of 3799 participants, 1040 individuals were excluded from the current analyses for following reasons: invalid dietary information (n = 381), missing data on fasting insulin or glucose measures (n = 143), presence of diabetes (n = 324), use of anticoagulant including the vitamin K antagonist, warfarin (n = 21), missing information on major covariates (n = 221). Our final sample size was 2719 (1247 men and 1472 women). The Institutional Review Boards for Human Research at Boston University and the Tufts-New England Medical Center approved this study.
Phylloquinone intake assessment
Usual dietary intakes for previous 12 months were assessed by a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), as described elsewhere (8). This FFQ was validated for various nutrients and foods (8, 9), including phylloquinone (10, 11). A significant correlation was observed between phylloquinone intake calculated from the FFQ and that from three 4-d diet record (r = 0.53) (10). A biomarker-based validation study has shown plasma phylloquinone levels increased approximately two-fold in a linear fashion across FFQ assessed phylloquinone intakes between 50 and 250 μg/d (11). The questionnaire was mailed to participants before examination, and the participants were asked to bring the completed questionnaire with them to their appointment. The FFQ consisted of a list of foods with a standard serving size, and a selection of nine frequency categories ranging from never or < 1 serving/mo to > 6 servings/d. Phylloquinone intake was calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each unit of food from the FFQ by the phylloquinone contents of the specific portion. Separate questions about use of vitamin and mineral supplements were also included in the FFQ. Phylloquinone intakes reported here included intakes from both diets and supplements. Data from the FFQ was judged as reliable if reported total energy intakes were ≥ 600 kcal/d (2.51 MJ/d) for men and women, but < 4200 kcal/d (17.54 MJ/d) for men or < 4000 kcal/d (16.74 MJ/d) for women, and if fewer than 13 items were left blank.
Insulin sensitivity measures
Fasting blood samples (≥ 8 hr) were collected at each examination cycle. Plasma and serum samples were stored at −70 °C. Plasma insulin concentrations were determined using the Coat-A-Count 125I-radioimmunoassay (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). This assay has cross-reactivity with proinsulin at the midcurve of 40%, intra- and inter-assay CVs of 5 to 10%, and a lower limit of sensitivity was 1.1 μU/mL (7.9 pmol/L). Plasma glucose concentrations were measured with a hexokinase regent kit (A-gent glucose test, Abbott Laboratories, Inc. South Pasadena, CA). Glucose assays were performed in duplicate and the CVs for this assay were < 3%. The 75-g OGTT was administered and 2-h post OGTT plasma insulin and glucose concentrations were measured. HbA1c was measured by HPLC after an overnight dialysis against normal saline to remove the labile fraction. The inter- and intra-assay CVs were < 2.5%. The assay was standardized against the glycosylated hemoglobin assay used in the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (12).
We calculated two indices of insulin sensitivity, HOMA-IR (13) and ISI0,120 (14). HOMA-IR is a surrogate measure of insulin sensitivity at basal state, and tends to represent hepatic insulin sensitivity whereas ISI0,120 reflects peripheral insulin resistance, glucose disposal and β-cell response to an energy load (15). The HOMA-IR was calculated with the following formula (13):
The ISI0,120 was calculated using the following formula (14):
where
Covariate information
Covariates used to examine associations between phylloquinone intake and insulin sensitivity included: age; sex; waist circumference (cm); alcohol intake (g/d); cigarette smoking status (smoked regularly in the past year: yes or no); multivitamin supplementation use (current use at the time of the examination: yes or no); estrogen use (reported current use of oral conjugated estrogen: yes or no); and physical activity. Physical activity was assessed by computing physical activity score based on a validated questionnaire of self-reported 24-hr history of activity (16). Total energy intake (kcal/d) was assessed by the semiquantitative FFQ (8). Overall diet quality was measured by using the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index (DGAI), as described elsewhere (17). The DGAI score was calculated based on age- and sex-specific energy requirement with a range between 0 and 20. Higher DGAI score indicates greater compliance with the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
Statistical analysis
SAS statistical software (version 9; SAS institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value < 0.05. Normality of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status measures was tested. Since insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR were skewed to the right, we analyzed these variables with the natural logarithm transformation. Phylloquinone intake was categorized based on quintiles of participants’ intake levels. HbA1c was categorized into two groups (HbA1c < 6.5% and HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) to capture individuals with long-term hyperglycemia.
To describe subject characteristics across phylloquinone intake, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed. Age and sex adjusted means or percentages (95% CI) were presented.
To assess the association between phylloquinone intake and insulin sensitivity and glycemic status measures, we applied ANCOVA and logistic regression for continuous and dichotomous markers of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status, respectively. Phylloquinone intake is a potential surrogate marker for healthy lifestyle and dietary pattern (18), which may relate to greater insulin sensitivity and improved glycemic status. As a result, lifestyle and diet quality potentially confound the association. Therefore, lifestyle characteristics were adjusted in model 1, and both lifestyle and dietary factors were controlled in model 2. Model 1 included age, sex, waist circumference, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, estrogen use, and multivitamin supplementation use. Model 2 adjusted for total energy intake and diet quality measured by the DGAI in addition to covariates used in model 1. In all models, tests for trend by quintile category of phylloquinone intake were performed by assigning median values of phylloquinone intake for each quintile category and treating them as continuous variables. We presented least squares means (95% CIs) and odds ratios (95% CIs) for results from ANCOVA and logistic regression analyses, respectively. We tested each association for interaction with age and sex; however, none of them were significant.
RESULTS
The final sample included 2719 participants (1247 men and 1472 women) with a mean age of 54.0 ± 9.7 (mean ± SD) (range 26-81 y). Phylloquinone intake ranged from 10 to 1975 μg/d (Table 1). Participants in the highest phylloquinone intake quintile category were more likely to be women than men, to use multivitamin supplements and were less likely to be current smokers. Phylloquinone intake was positively associated with physical activity, alcohol consumption, total energy intake, the DGAI score, and among women, estrogen use. Participants in the highest quintile category had lower waist circumference. However, there was no association between phylloquinone intake and BMI.
Table 1.
Characteristics of men and women in the Framingham Offspring Cohort across quintiles of phylloquinone intake (N = 2719)
| Phylloquinone intake quintile category |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | P for trend1 | |
| N | 543 | 544 | 544 | 544 | 544 | |
| Phylloquinone intake median (μg/d) | 63 | 103 | 139 | 185 | 282 | |
| Phylloquinone intake range (μg/d) | 10 - 83 | 84 -120 | 120 -160 | 160 - 218 | 218-1975 | |
| Characteristics2 | ||||||
| Age (y) | 53.3 (52.5, 54.2) | 54.2 (53.3, 55.0) | 53.8 (53.0, 54.6) | 54.6 (53.8, 55.4) | 54 (53.2, 54.8) | 0.32 |
| Female (%) | 42 (38, 47) | 49 (45, 53) | 52 (48, 56) | 61 (57, 66) | 66 (62, 70) | < 0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 92.7 (91.6, 93.7) | 92.4 (91.3, 93.4) | 92.2 (91.2, 93.2) | 92.4 (91.4, 93.5) | 90.9 (89.8, 91.9) | 0.02 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.3 (26.9, 27.6) | 27.1 (26.8, 27.5) | 27.1 (26.7, 27.5) | 27.2 (26.8, 27.6) | 26.9 (26.5, 27.3) | 0.19 |
| Physical activity score (MET) | 34.6 (34.1, 35.1) | 34.5 (34.0, 35.0) | 35.0 (34.5, 35.5) | 35.2 (34.7, 35.7) | 35.2 (34.7, 35.7) | 0.04 |
| Current smokers (%) | 27 (24, 31) | 21 (18, 24) | 17 (13, 20) | 14 (11, 18) | 16 (13, 20) | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol consumption (g/d) | 10.5 (9.1, 11.8) | 10.2 (8.8, 11.5) | 11.1 (9.8, 12.4) | 12.3 (10.9, 13.6) | 12.1 (10.7, 13.4) | 0.02 |
| Estrogen use (% in females) | 15 (10, 20) | 13 (9, 18) | 15 (10, 19) | 20 (16, 24) | 20 (16, 24) | 0.01 |
| Multivitamin use (%) | 22 (18, 25) | 22 (18, 26) | 27 (23, 31) | 32 (29, 36) | 34 (30, 38) | < 0.001 |
| Total energy (kcal/d) | 1498 (1451, 1545) | 1750 (1703, 1797) | 1891 (1845, 1938) | 2029 (1982, 2076) | 2205 (2157, 2252) | < 0.001 |
| Dietary guideline adherence index score | 7.2 (7.0, 7.4) | 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) | 9.2 (9.0, 9.3) | 10 (9.8, 10.2) | 11.2 (11.0, 11.4) | < 0.001 |
Analysis of covariance was used to examine the participant characteristics across phylloquinone intake quintile categories. P for trend by quintile category of phylloquinone intakes were performed by assigning median values of phylloquinone intake for each quintile category and treating them as continuous variables.
Values are least squares mean or percentage (95% CI). Least squares means and percentages are adjusted for sex and age. Age is adjusted for sex only, and sex and estrogen use are adjusted for age only. Since dietary guideline adherence index score was calculated based on age and sex specific criteria, the P for trend is unadjusted for age and sex.
A higher phylloquinone intake was associated with indices of insulin sensitivity after adjustment for age, sex, waist circumference and lifestyle characteristics (Table 2). The associations between phylloquinone intake and fasting insulin concentrations, and with HOMA-IR became non-significant after adjustment for total energy and diet quality, as assessed by the DGAI. However, these associations remained significant when diet quality was adjusted by a healthy-choice subscore, a sub-component of DGAI which does not include dark green vegetable intake component (fasting insulin: P for trend = 0.01; HOMA-IR: P for trend = 0.01). In contrast, the associations between phylloquinone intake and 2-h post OGTT insulin, and with ISI0,120 remained significant with additional adjustment for total energy intake and DGAI. A higher phylloquinone intake was associated with lower 2-h post OGTT glucose in the fully adjusted model. Further adjustment for other dietary factors, which include total fiber, saturated fatty acid, n-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA), or potassium, did not affect associations between phylloquinone and 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose, or ISI0,120 (data are not shown). There was no association between phylloquinone intake and fasting glucose concentrations or HbA1c. Energy-adjusted phylloquinone intakes based on regression residuals provided same results.
Table 2.
Insulin sensitivity and glycemic status measures across phylloquinone intake quintiles (N = 2719)
| Phylloquinone intake quintile category |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | P for trend1 | |
| Median (μg/d) | 63 | 103 | 139 | 185 | 282 | |
| Range (μg/d) | 10 - 83 | 84 -120 | 120 -160 | 160 - 218 | 218 -1975 | |
| N | 543 | 544 | 544 | 544 | 544 | |
| Insulin sensitivity measures2 | ||||||
| Fasting insulin (μU/mL) | ||||||
| Model 13 | 29.2 (28.5, 29.8) | 29.1 (28.4, 29.7) | 28.3 (27.7, 28.9) | 28.4 (27.8, 29.0) | 27.9 (27.3, 28.5) | 0.003 |
| Model 24 | 29.0 (28.2, 29.7) | 28.9 (28.3, 29.6) | 28.3 (27.7, 28.9) | 28.4 (27.8, 29.1) | 28.1 (27.4, 28.8) | 0.14 |
| 2-h OGTT insulin (μU/mL)5 | ||||||
| Model 1 | 80.4 (76.8, 84.2) | 81.1 (77.4, 84.8) | 80.4 (76.8, 84.1) | 78.6 (75.0, 82.3) | 73.1 (69.8, 76.6) | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 81.0 (76.8, 85.3) | 81.0 (77.3, 84.9) | 80.3 (76.7, 84.0) | 78.4 (74.8, 82.2) | 72.7 (68.9, 76.6) | 0.003 |
| HOMA-IR | ||||||
| Model 1 | 6.51 (6.35, 6.68) | 6.53 (6.37, 6.70) | 6.33 (6.17, 6.49) | 6.37 (6.21, 6.53) | 6.23 (6.07, 6.39) | 0.007 |
| Model 2 | 6.46 (6.27, 6.64) | 6.48 (6.31, 6.65) | 6.33 (6.17, 6.49) | 6.38 (6.22, 6.55) | 6.29 (6.11, 6.47) | 0.22 |
| ISI0,1205 (mg·L2/mmol·mU·min) | ||||||
| Model 1 | 26.5 (26.0, 27.0) | 26.1 (25.6, 26.6) | 26.1 (25.6, 26.7) | 26.5 (26.0, 27.1) | 27.1 (26.6, 27.7) | 0.03 |
| Model 2 | 26.3 (25.7, 26.9) | 26.1 (25.5, 26.6) | 26.1 (25.6, 26.7) | 26.6 (26.0, 27.2) | 27.3 (26.7, 27.9) | 0.009 |
| Glycemic status measures2 | ||||||
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | ||||||
| Model 1 | 94.3 (93.6, 95.1) | 95.0 (94.2, 95.7) | 94.7 (94.0, 95.4) | 94.8 (94.1, 95.6) | 94.4 (93.6, 95.1) | 0.77 |
| Model 2 | 94.2 (93.4, 95.0) | 94.8 (94.0, 95.5) | 94.7 (94.0, 95.4) | 94.9 (94.2, 95.6) | 94.6 (93.8, 95.4) | 0.76 |
| 2-h OGTT glucose (mg/dL) 5 | ||||||
| Model 1 | 105.3 (103.0, 107.5) | 106.5 (104.3, 108.7) | 105.9 (103.7, 108.1) | 105.0 (102.7, 107.3) | 102.9 (100.6, 105.2) | 0.06 |
| Model 2 | 106.3 (103.8, 108.9) | 106.9 (104.5, 109.2) | 105.8 (103.6, 108.1) | 104.6 (102.3, 106.9) | 101.9 (99.3, 104.5) | 0.009 |
| HbA1c (≥ 6.5 % of total hemoglobin) 6 | ||||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 (0.30, 1.44) | 0.81 (0.38, 1.75) | 0.91 (0.43, 1.90) | 0.39 (0.15, 1.00) | 0.11 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.71 (0.32, 1.58) | 0.91 (0.40, 2.09) | 1.07 (0.45, 2.53) | 0.50 (0.15, 1.55) | 0.37 |
Analysis of covariance was performed to examine the association between phylloquinone intake quintile categories and measures of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status. P value is based on linear regression β coefficient for phylloquinone intake quintile as a continuous variable. For HbA1c, logistic regression was performed to assess the association between phylloquinone intake quintiles and HbA1c (≥ 6.5 % HbA1c). P value is based on the logistic regression maximum likelihood estimate for phylloquinone intake quintile as a continuous variable.
Values of insulin and HOMA-IR are adjusted geometric means (95% CI). Values of glucose and ISI0,120 are least squares means (95% CI). Values of HbA1c are odds ratio (95% CI) for prevalence of HbA1c ≥ 6.5% of total hemoglobin.
Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, physical activity score, smoking, alcohol consumption, multivitamin use, and estrogen use.
Model 2 adjusted for total energy intake, the DGAI score and all covariates in model 1.
Due to data availability 2655 and 1992 subjects were included in the analyses for the association between phylloquinone intake and 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose and HbA1c, respectively. For 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose, and ISI0,120, the number of participants in each quintile is 534, 535, 532, 528, and 526 for Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and Q5, respectively. For HbA1c, sample size for each quintile is 391, 389, 403, 391, and 418, for Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and Q5, respectively.
DISCUSSION
The major finding of the present study was that higher phylloquinone intake was associated with greater insulin sensitivity, as measured by 2-h post OGTT insulin and ISI0,120, and better glycemic status by 2-h post OGTT glucose concentrations in a community-based sample of men and women. These observations are consistent with a previous small metabolic study, in which young men with lower vitamin K status, as assessed by biochemical markers, had higher 2-h post OGTT insulin concentrations compared with those with greater vitamin K status (3). Accordingly, it has been proposed that vitamin K may have a potential biological role in glucose homeostasis.
Although phylloquinone intake was significantly associated with insulin sensitivity and glycemic status, as assessed from 2-h OGTT measurements in the present study, we did not find significant associations between phylloquinone intake and insulin sensitivity and glycemic status measures assessed in the fasting state. Currently we do not have an explanation for observed disparity in baseline and 2-h measures. However, our results are consistent with findings from a previous report from a small metabolic study of young men (2). Men with lower reported phylloquinone intake had lower insulin and higher glucose concentrations at 30 min after oral glucose loading, compared with those with higher phylloquinone intake, but there was no association between phylloquinone intake and either fasting glucose or insulin concentrations (2). Potentially, a delayed early response of insulin release by the β-cells to oral glucose loading may explain observed elevation of 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose concentrations in individuals with lower reported phylloquinone intake in our study. However, our interpretation of data is limited since we did not assess the effect of phylloquinone intake on the acute insulin and glucose responses to oral glucose loading in the present study.
The non-significant association between phylloquinone intake and fasting insulin and HOMA-IR is potentially due to over-adjustment in statistical models. Consumption of dark green vegetables, which are major sources of phylloquinone in this population, is part of the DGAI. When a sub-score of the DGAI that did not include the dark green vegetable intake component was used instead of the overall DGAI in our statistical models, higher phylloquinone intake was associated with fasting insulin and HOMA-IR.
We also observed that higher phylloquinone intake was associated with higher ISI0,120, which indicates greater insulin sensitivity. ISI0,120 may capture more of the complexity of insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis than either HOMA-IR or the individual measures of insulin and glucose concentrations. The ISI0,120 incorporates body weight, and fasting and 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose concentrations. It is a complex assessment of insulin sensitivity that accounts for β-cell response to glucose loading, peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity, and glucose disposal (15). A previous study has shown a high correlation between ISI0,120 and insulin sensitivity, as measured by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique (14). In the absence of appropriate measures, the current study cannot determine if phylloquinone intake is associated with β-cell response, insulin sensitivity, glucose disposal, or all. However, all these components are involved in glucose homeostasis and their dysfunction contributes to diabetes (19, 20).
The potential biological mechanisms relating phylloquinone to insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis are not understood. Two forms of vitamin K, phylloquinone and menaquinone-4, are found in the pancreas (21). However, vitamin K-dependent proteins specific to the pancreas have not been identified. A recent study proposed osteocalcin, one of the vitamin K dependent proteins in the bone, may improve insulin sensitivity and increase β-cell functions partially through the enhancement of adiponectin expression (5). Alternatively, it has been suggested that vitamin K has potential physiological functions in addition to its classic role as a cofactor for γ-carboxylation (22). Recent in vivo, in vitro and observational studies have shown that vitamin K decreases inflammation induced cytokines (23-25), so it is plausible that phylloquinone may improve insulin sensitivity and glycemic status by the suppression of inflammation.
There are several limitations in the present study. First, higher phylloquinone intake is a potential surrogate marker for a healthy dietary pattern, as characterized by higher intakes of fruit, vegetables, fish, dietary fiber, and lower intakes of saturated fat (18). Furthermore, since green leafy vegetables are also rich in other components (e.g. dietary fiber and potassium) which have been reported to improve insulin sensitivity, phylloquinone intake may be tracking components in green leafy vegetables that may be beneficial to insulin sensitivity and glycemic status. Although we cannot rule out the presence of residual confounding by overall lifestyle characteristics and diet quality, which may lead to the overestimation of the associations between phylloquinone intake and measures of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status, our finding does not support the hypothesis that these associations are due solely to diet quality. Additional adjustment for diet quality did not alter the significant associations between phylloquinone intake and measures of insulin sensitivity and glycemic status, as measured by 2-h post OGTT insulin and glucose, and ISI0,120. Therefore, observed associations between phylloquinone intake and insulin sensitivity may indicate a biological role of phylloquinone in glucose homeostasis. A second limitation of this study is its cross-sectional nature, which limits any causal inference from our observations. Finally, most participants in the Framingham Offspring Study have a Northern European ancestry. However, our findings are consistent with those in Japanese young adults (2, 3). Thus, generalizability to other populations may not present a major limitation.
In summary, our findings suggest phylloquinone intake may have beneficial effect on glucose homeostasis, or may serve as a surrogate marker of other dietary or lifestyle factors that were not controlled in our analysis. Our findings may lead to further areas of research that may help to elucidate potential novel functions of vitamin K. Future studies should focus on prospective relationships between phylloquinone intakes and surrogate markers for insulin sensitivity, glycemic status, and type 2 diabetes, as well as the putative biological mechanism to explain associations between phylloquinone and glucose homeostasis.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Boston University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Statistical Consulting Unit, chairman Dr. Ralph D'Agostino and his staff for their statistical assistance, Gail Rogers for data management, and Dr. David M. Nathan for assistance with insulin measurements. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Nicola McKeown for initial statistical analysis on this project.
The authors responsibilities were as follows – MY: statistical analysis and draft of the manuscript; SLB: formulation of original idea; PFJ: draft of the manuscript; All authors: study design, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript.
Supported by USDA agreement no. 58-1950-7-707 and the Framingham Heart Study of the NIH-NHLBI (Contract No. N01-HC-25195). JBM was supported by a Career Development Award from the American Diabetes Association and by NIDDK K24 DK080140. Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture.
Footnotes
MY, SLB, JBM, ES, and PFJ have nothing to declare.
None of the authors had a personal or financial conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Sakamoto N, Wakabayashi I, Sakamoto K. Low vitamin K intake effects on glucose tolerance in rats. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1999;69:27–31. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.69.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sakamoto N, Nishiike T, Iguchi H, Sakamoto K. Relationship between acute insulin response and vitamin K intake in healthy young male volunteers. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 1999;12:37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sakamoto N, Nishiike T, Iguchi H, Sakamoto K. Possible effects of one week vitamin K (menaquinone-4) tablets intake on glucose tolerance in healthy young male volunteers with different descarboxy prothrombin levels. Clin Nutr. 2000;19:259–63. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Booth SL, Suttie JW. Dietary intake and adequacy of vitamin K. J Nutr. 1998;128:785–8. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.5.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee NK, Sowa H, Hinoi E, et al. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell. 2007;130:456–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:281–90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Feinleib M, Kannel WB, Garrison RJ, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. The Framingham Offspring Study. Design and preliminary data. Preventive Medicine. 1975;4:518–25. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(75)90037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:1114–26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116211. discussion 1127-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Feskanich D, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, et al. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:790–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(93)91754-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feskanich D, Weber P, Willett WC, Rockett H, Booth SL, Colditz GA. Vitamin K intake and hip fractures in women: a prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:74–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.1.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McKeown NM, Jacques PF, Gundberg CM, et al. Dietary and nondietary determinants of vitamin K biochemical measures in men and women. J Nutr. 2002;132:1329–34. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.6.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gutt M, Davis CL, Spitzer SB, et al. Validation of the insulin sensitivity index (ISI(0,120)): comparison with other measures. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;47:177–84. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rutter MK, Meigs JB, Sullivan LM, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Wilson PW. Insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and incident cardiovascular events in the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes. 2005;54:3252–7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kannel WB, Belanger A, D'Agostino R, Israel I. Physical activity and physical demand on the job and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1986;112:820–5. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90480-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fogli-Cawley JJ, Dwyer JT, Saltzman E, McCullough ML, Troy LM, Jacques PF. The 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index: development and application. J Nutr. 2006;136:2908–15. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.11.2908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Braam L, McKeown N, Jacques P, et al. Dietary phylloquinone intake as a potential marker for a heart-healthy dietary pattern in the Framingham Offspring cohort. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1410–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lillioja S, Mott DM, Spraul M, et al. Insulin resistance and insulin secretory dysfunction as precursors of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Prospective studies of Pima Indians. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1988–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Bogardus C, Pratley RE. Insulin resistance and insulin secretory dysfunction are independent predictors of worsening of glucose tolerance during each stage of type 2 diabetes development. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:89–94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thijssen HH, Drittij-Reijnders MJ. Vitamin K status in human tissues: tissue-specific accumulation of phylloquinone and menaquinone-4. Br J Nutr. 1996;75:121–7. doi: 10.1079/bjn19960115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaneki M, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Orimo H. Pleiotropic actions of vitamin K: protector of bone health and beyond? Nutrition. 2006;22:845–52. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ohsaki Y, Shirakawa H, Hiwatashi K, Furukawa Y, Mizutani T, Komai M. Vitamin K suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in the rat. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70:926–32. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reddi K, Henderson B, Meghji S, et al. Interleukin 6 production by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human fibroblasts is potently inhibited by naphthoquinone (vitamin K) compounds. Cytokine. 1995;7:287–90. doi: 10.1006/cyto.1995.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shea MK, Booth SL, Massaro JM, et al. Vitamin K and Vitamin D Status: Associations with Inflammatory Markers in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
