Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytometry A. 2014 Oct 28;85(12):995–998. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22580

OMIP-024: Pan-leukocyte immunophenotypic characterization of PBMC subsets in human samples

Gemma Moncunill 1,2,*, Hannah Han 1, Carlota Dobaño 2, M Juliana McElrath 1,3, Stephen C De Rosa 1,4
PMCID: PMC4457440  NIHMSID: NIHMS694588  PMID: 25352070

Purpose and Appropriate Sample Types

This phenotyping panel was developed to measure the relative frequencies of multiple leukocyte cell subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from African infants and children, including the expression of immune activation and differentiation markers. It was optimized with the objective of obtaining the maximum information concerning the immune status and cell subsets that could influence the immune response to vaccines and infectious diseases using small volumes of pediatric samples. It was developed using cryopreserved PBMC from healthy HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected US adults, but it has also been tested with cryopreserved PBMC from US infants. Although we have not tested the panel on whole blood, it is likely that the panel could be used with whole blood following minimal optimization.

Background

Pediatric samples are often limited to small volumes of blood (typically 5 mL or less) and require high-level multicolor analyses to take full advantage of them. An 18-color panel was developed for phenotyping cryopreserved PBMC from African infants and children participating in a vaccine trial (1,2). These valuable samples with very limited amount of cells are devoted primarily to the assessment of the antigen-specific cells induced by the vaccine. However, when there are additional cells, it is of interest to characterize the PBMC populations with a phenotyping panel. Cell frequencies and differentiation/activation of particular cell subsets such as monocytes, NK cells or T- and B-cell subsets may influence the immunogenicity of the vaccine and its efficacy (3,4). These cell subsets, and additionally γδ T cells, may contribute to the mechanisms of vaccine induced protection (57) as well as the response to infectious diseases such as malaria (810). This is of special relevance in African settings where infants and children are continuously exposed to infections and unfavorable conditions for the immune system, such as malnutrition. In our case, comprehensive immunophenotypic characterization may shed light on the variability in efficacy of the RTS,S malaria vaccine candidate observed in clinical trials, included the phase III trial under study (1,2).

The panel examines the frequency of monocytes, B cells, plasmablasts, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), γδ T cells, NK T-like cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells, as well as memory and activation markers. After viability (AViD) staining for the exclusion of dead cells, CD3, CD4, and CD8 markers were included for the gating of T cells, CD19 for B cells, and CD14 and CD16 for monocytes. NK cells and γδ T cells are of special interest for malaria immunology and vaccinology. Therefore, we prioritized the inclusion of CD56 (neural cell adhesion molecule NCAM) and CD16 (Fcγ-receptor IIIa) for defining 5 different NK cell subsets: the two more common subsets CD56dimCD16+ and CD56hiCD16+, and the unconventional CD56dimCD16−, CD56hiCD16+ and CD56−CD16+ subsets. Of importance, these subsets have been described to have different phenotypic, functional and maturation profiles and certain diseases have been associated with its redistribution and expansion (11,12). For the identification of γδ T cells, pan-γδ TCR and Vδ2 TCR markers were included to define the γδ T cells as Vδ2+ and Vδ2− (the latter are likely mainly Vδ1+, as Vδ1 and Vδ2 are the dominant Vδ genes in humans) (13). The inclusion of CD56 permitted also the identification NK T-like cells defined as CD56+CD3+. Due to the limitation on the number of colors available in the panel, only a few NK receptors could be included. CD57 was selected because it can also be used as a differentiation marker for T cells, and we also added the activating receptor NKG2C. CMV infection has been shown to expand NKG2C+ cells and increase the expression of NKG2C on these cells (14), although the consequences on the immune response to vaccines or other infections are yet to be described.

In addition to designing a panel that embraces the maximum of cell subsets, the panel had to be logistically feasible and avoid experimental complexity since it had to be performed in parallel to other flow cytometry assays using the same PBMC samples. Therefore, any intracellular markers were excluded to avoid the fixation and permeabilization steps necessary for the intracellular staining. For instance, to gate Tregs we used CD25 (IL-2Rα-chain) and CD127 (IL-7Rα-chain) markers without the inclusion of FoxP3, which requires intracellular staining. Previous studies proved that CD25highCD127− CD4+ T cells are a good correlate of Tregs (1517), although this identification strategy may over- or underestimate its frequency. According to literature, about 13% of the CD25highCD127− CD4+ T cells may be FoxP3− (1518).

The memory and differentiation markers CD45RA and CCR7 were added to distinguish naïve (CD45RA+CCR7+), central memory (CD45RA−CCR7+), effector memory (CD45RA−CCR7−) and terminal effector memory (CD45RA+CCR7−) subsets (1921). These cell subsets can be further characterized by the expression of two additional markers already present in the panel: the IL-7 receptor CD127, involved in homeostatic proliferation and in the survival of memory T cell precursors (20,22); and CD57, indicative of cell senescence, failure to proliferate and susceptibility to activation-induced cell death (23,24), but also a correlate of high cytolytic potential (25). Initially, we considered adding CD28 instead of CD57, but they are mutually exclusive in the different memory subsets and CD57 is more relevant for NK cells in infectious diseases (26) and vaccine effector responses (27).

CD38 and HLA-DR were included as cell activation markers. Differential expression of these two T-cell activation markers identifies subsets correlating with disease prognosis, particularly in HIV-1 infection (28). Another set of activation markers of interest was Bcl2 and Ki67, but we excluded them because they require intracellular staining. Additionally, CD38 staining allows the identification of plasmablast cells, which are defined as CD19+ with a high CD38 expression (21). Finally, negative gating using all the lineage markers together with HLA-DR staining allows measurement of dendritic cells as lineage− HLA-DR+ cells (21).

Similarity to published OMIPs

Our panel includes a wide range of markers to identify several human PBMC subsets and therefore covers a number of cell types and cell markers addressed individually by different OMIP panels: OMIP-007 (29) since they examine NK cells, OMIP-013 (30) because it examines differentiation of T cells, OMIP-015 (18) due to the identification of Tregs and activated T cells without intracellular staining, and OMIP-019 (31), OMIP-020 (32) and OMIP-021 (33) since all three comprise a characterization of γδ T cells, and additionally OMIP-019 and OMIP-021 include enumeration of NK T cells.

Supplementary Material

OMIP024 Supplemental material

Figure 1. Example of the staining and gating strategy.

Figure 1

Cryopreserved PBMC from an HIV-infected and treated individual were stained with the complete panel. All gates were defined using fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls. (A) Initial gating is done on FSC-H and FSC-A to discriminate singlets, followed by the exclusion of events collected during a period of time early in collection when fluctuations may occur. Dead cells are excluded by an amine reactive dye. Monocytes (classical CD14+CD16−, intermediate CD14+CD16+, and non-classical CD16+CD14dim) are identified as HLA-DR+ cells and subsequently by CD14 and CD16 staining. (B) Lymphocytes are gated using FSC-A and SSC-A from a Boolean gate of live cells and not monocytes. Subsequent gating discriminates CD3+ cells, followed by identification of Vδ2+ and Vδ2− γδ T cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Within CD4+ T cells, Tregs are CD127− while expressing high levels of CD25. Within CD3− cells, five NK cell subsets are discriminated based on CD56 and CD16 expression (CD56hiCD16−, CD56dimCD16−, CD56hiCD16+, CD56dimCD16+ and CD56−CD16+) and B cells are identified as CD19+HLA-DR+. Within B cells, plasmablasts are discriminated by a high CD38 expression. Finally, using CD3 and CD56, NK T-like cells are identified from the lymphocyte gate. Of note, γδ T cells, Tregs and NK T-like cells are not excluded from classical T cells and therefore are overlapping populations (C) After negative gating on all lineage markers (shown in Online Material), dendritic cells are identified by HLA-DR high expression. (D) The expression level of CCR7, CD45RA, CD57, and CD127 is examined within CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets as gated in (B) to provide insight into memory and differentiation of these cell subsets; HLA-DR and CD38 are evaluated in the same subsets to assess activation. Boolean gates are later created based on the gates shown to identify cells expressing various combinations of markers. The same gating strategy is applied for other cell subsets (shown in Online Material). (E) Variable staining of CD57 and NKG2C in NK T-like cells and the different NK cell subsets to show different functional profiles (example gating on the CD56hiCD16−, CD56dimCD16+, and CD56−CD16+ cells).

Table 1.

Summary table for application of OMIP-024.

Purpose Characterize the phenotype of PBMC leukocyte subsets
Species Human
Cell types Cryopreserved PBMC from adults and infants
Cross-references n.a.

PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Table 2.

Reagents used for OMIP-024.

SPECIFICITY CLONE FLUOROCROME PURPOSE
CD3 UCHT1 ECD Lineage T cells
CD4 SK3 BUV395
CD8 SK1 PerCP-Cy5.5
CD19 SJ25C1 BUV737 B cells
CD14 MφP9 BV711 Monocytes
CD56 HCD56 BV605 NK cells and NK T-like cells
CD16 3G8 APC-Cy7 NK cells and monocytes
γδ TCR 11F2 PE-Cy7 γδ T cells
Vδ2 B6 PE
CD25 M-A251 BV421 Tregs
CD127 A019D5 APC Tregs/Memory/Differentiation
CD45RA HI100 BV650 Memory/Differentiation
CCR7 G043H7 BV785
CD57 NK-1 FITC
HLA-DR L243 BV570 Activation
CD38 HIT2 PE-Cy5 Activation/Plasmablasts
NKG2C 134591 Ax700 NK receptor
Live/Dead NA AViD Viability

APC, allophycocyanin; Ax, Alexa; AViD, LIVE/DEAD fixable aqua dead cell stain; BUV, brilliant ultraviolet; BV, brilliant violet; Cy, cyanine; ECD, phycoerythrin-Texas Red; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PE, R-phycoerythrin; PerCP, peridinin chlorophyll protein.

Acknowledgments

Grant sponsors: HIV Vaccine Trials Network Laboratory Center (HVTN, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), grant number: UM1 AI068618; Human Immunology Project Consortium (HIPC, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), grant number: P30 AI027757; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, salary support to G.M., fellowship number: CD10/00156.

The authors thank Min Xu from Seattle Children’s Hospital for kindly providing de-identified infant samples. The authors also wish to thank all the individuals enrolled in the Seattle Assay Control cohort, from which PBMC were used for optimization and testing of the panel. The authors acknowledge HVTN technicians Nathaniel Chartrand and Paul Newling for their help when the flow cytometer presented problems, and Stephen Voght for help with editing. We thank the James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust for their generous equipment donation. We thank the MAL067 Vaccine Immunology Workgroup (VIW) for their support for developing the panel for the pediatric phase III RTS,S immune correlates study, and particularly, Claudia Daubenberger for her inputs in the design of this panel.

Literature cited

  • 1.Agnandji ST, Lell B, Soulanoudjingar SS, Fernandes JF, Abossolo BP, Conzelmann C, Methogo BGNO, Doucka Y, Flamen A, Mordmüller B, Issifou S, Kremsner PG, Sacarlal J, Aide P, Lanaspa M, Aponte JJ, Nhamuave A, Quelhas D, Bassat Q, Mandjate S, Macete E, Alonso P, Abdulla S, Salim N, Juma O, Shomari M, Shubis K, Machera F, Hamad AS, Minja R, Mtoro A, Sykes A, Ahmed S, Urassa AM, Ali AM, Mwangoka G, Tanner M, Tinto H, D’Alessandro U, Sorgho H, Valea I, Tahita MC, Kaboré W, Ouédraogo S, Sandrine Y, Guiguemdé RT, Ouédraogo JB, Hamel MJ, Kariuki S, Odero C, Oneko M, Otieno K, Awino N, Omoto J, Williamson J, Muturi-Kioi V, Laserson KF, Slutsker L, Otieno W, Otieno L, Nekoye O, Gondi S, Otieno A, Ogutu B, Wasuna R, Owira V, Jones D, Onyango AA, Njuguna P, Chilengi R, Akoo P, Kerubo C, Gitaka J, Maingi C, Lang T, Olotu A, Tsofa B, Bejon P, Peshu N, Marsh K, Owusu-Agyei S, Asante KP, Osei-Kwakye K, Boahen O, Ayamba S, Kayan K, Owusu-Ofori R, Dosoo D, Asante I, Adjei G, Chandramohan D, Greenwood B, Lusingu J, Gesase S, Malabeja A, Abdul O, Kilavo H, Mahende C, et al. First results of phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African children. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1863–75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agnandji ST, Lell B, Fernandes JF, Abossolo BP, Methogo BGNO, Kabwende AL, Adegnika AA, Mordmüller B, Issifou S, Kremsner PG, Sacarlal J, Aide P, Lanaspa M, Aponte JJ, Machevo S, Acacio S, Bulo H, Sigauque B, Macete E, Alonso P, Abdulla S, Salim N, Minja R, Mpina M, Ahmed S, Ali AM, Mtoro AT, Hamad AS, Mutani P, Tanner M, Tinto H, D’Alessandro U, Sorgho H, Valea I, Bihoun B, Guiraud I, Kaboré B, Sombié O, Guiguemdé RT, Ouédraogo JB, Hamel MJ, Kariuki S, Oneko M, Odero C, Otieno K, Awino N, McMorrow M, Muturi-Kioi V, Laserson KF, Slutsker L, Otieno W, Otieno L, Otsyula N, Gondi S, Otieno A, Owira V, Oguk E, Odongo G, Ben Woods J, Ogutu B, Njuguna P, Chilengi R, Akoo P, Kerubo C, Maingi C, Lang T, Olotu A, Bejon P, Marsh K, Mwambingu G, Owusu-Agyei S, Asante KP, Osei-Kwakye K, Boahen O, Dosoo D, Asante I, Adjei G, Kwara E, Chandramohan D, Greenwood B, Lusingu J, Gesase S, Malabeja A, Abdul O, Mahende C, Liheluka E, Malle L, Lemnge M, Theander TG, Drakeley C, Ansong D, Agbenyega T, Adjei S, Boateng HO, Rettig T, Bawa J, Sylverken J, Sambian D, et al. A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2284–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Warimwe GM, Fletcher Ha, Olotu A, Agnandji ST, Hill AV, Marsh K, Bejon P. Peripheral blood monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio at study enrollment predicts efficacy of the RTS,S malaria vaccine: analysis of pooled phase II clinical trial data. BMC Med. 2013;11:184. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muyanja E, Ssemaganda A, Gauv NP, Cubas R, Perrin H, Srinivasan D, Canderan G, Lawson B, Kopycinski J, Graham AS, Rowe DK, Smith MJ, Isern S, Michael S, Silvestri G, Vanderford TH, Castro E, Pantaleo G, Singer J, Gillmour J, Kiwanuka N, Nanvubya A, Schmidt C, Birungi J, Cox J, Haddad EK, Kaleebu P, Fast P, Sekaly R, Trautmann L. Immune activation alters cellular and humoral responses to yellow fever 17D vaccine. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:3147–3158. doi: 10.1172/JCI75429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Horowitz A, Hafalla JCR, King E, Lusingu J, Dekker D, Leach A, Moris P, Cohen J, Vekemans J, Villafana T, Corran PH, Bejon P, Drakeley CJ, von Seidlein L, Riley EM. Antigen-Specific IL-2 Secretion Correlates with NK Cell Responses after Immunization of Tanzanian Children with the RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine. J Immunol. 2012;188:5054–5062. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horowitz A, Newman KC, Evans JH, Korbel DS, Davis DM, Riley EM. Cross-talk between T cells and NK cells generates rapid effector responses to Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J Immunol. 2010;184:6043–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seder RA, Chang L-J, Enama ME, Zephir KL, Sarwar UN, Gordon IJ, Holman LA, James ER, Billingsley PF, Gunasekera A, Richman A, Chakravarty S, Manoj A, Velmurugan S, Li M, Ruben AJ, Li T, Eappen AG, Stafford RE, Plummer SH, Hendel CS, Novik L, Costner PJM, Mendoza FH, Saunders JG, Nason MC, Richardson JH, Murphy J, Davidson SA, Richie TL, Sedegah M, Sutamihardja A, Fahle GA, Lyke KE, Laurens MB, Roederer M, Tewari K, Epstein JE, Sim BKL, Ledgerwood JE, Graham BS, Hoffman SL. Protection against malaria by intravenous immunization with a nonreplicating sporozoite vaccine. Science (80- ) 2013;341:1359–65. doi: 10.1126/science.1241800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.D’Ombrain MC, Robinson LJ, Stanisic DI, Taraika J, Bernard N, Michon P, Mueller I, Schofield L. Association of early interferon-gamma production with immunity to clinical malaria: a longitudinal study among Papua New Guinean children. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1380–7. doi: 10.1086/592971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chimma P, Roussilhon C, Sratongno P, Ruangveerayuth R, Pattanapanyasat K, Pérignon J-L, Roberts DJ, Druilhe P. A distinct peripheral blood monocyte phenotype is associated with parasite inhibitory activity in acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000631. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Teirlinck AC, McCall MBB, Roestenberg M, Scholzen A, Woestenenk R, de Mast Q, van der Ven AJAM, Hermsen CC, Luty AJF, Sauerwein RW. Longevity and Composition of Cellular Immune Responses Following Experimental Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Infection in Humans. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002389. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cooper Ma, Fehniger Ta, Caligiuri Ma. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001;22:633–40. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Béziat V, Duffy D, Quoc SN, Le Garff-Tavernier M, Decocq J, Combadière B, Debré P, Vieillard V. CD56brightCD16+ NK cells: a functional intermediate stage of NK cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2011;186:6753–61. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Rosa SC, Andrus JP, Perfetto SP, Mantovani JJ, Herzenberg LA, Roederer M. Ontogeny of gd T Cells in Humans. J Immunol. 2004;172:1637–1645. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Muntasell A, Vilches C, Angulo A, López-Botet M. Adaptive reconfiguration of the human NK-cell compartment in response to cytomegalovirus: A different perspective of the host-pathogen interaction. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:1133–1141. doi: 10.1002/eji.201243117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saison J, Demaret J, Venet F, Chidiac C, Malcus C, Poitevin-Later F, Tardy J-C, Ferry T, Monneret G. CD4+CD25+CD127− assessment as a surrogate phenotype for FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in HIV-1 infected viremic and aviremic subjects. Cytom B. 2013;84:50–4. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu W, Putnam AL, Xu-Yu Z, Szot GL, Lee MR, Zhu S, Gottlieb Pa, Kapranov P, Gingeras TR, Fazekas de St Groth B, Clayberger C, Soper DM, Ziegler SF, Bluestone Ja. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1701–11. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Seddiki N, Santner-Nanan B, Martinson J, Zaunders J, Sasson S, Landay A, Solomon M, Selby W, Alexander SI, Nanan R, Kelleher A, Fazekas de St Groth B. Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1693–700. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mahnke YD, Beddall MH, Roederer M. OMIP-015: human regulatory and activated T-cells without intracellular staining. Cytom A. 2013;83:179–81. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sallusto F, Lenig D, Förster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401:708–12. doi: 10.1038/44385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Larbi A, Fulop T. From “truly naïve” to “exhausted senescent” T cells: when markers predict functionality. Cytom A. 2014;85:25–35. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maecker HT, McCoy JP, Nussenblatt R. Standardizing immunophenotyping for the Human Immunology Project. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:191–200. doi: 10.1038/nri3158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kaech SM, Tan JT, Wherry EJ, Konieczny BT, Surh CD, Ahmed R. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:1191–8. doi: 10.1038/ni1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brenchley JM, Karandikar NJ, Betts MR, Ambrozak DR, Hill BJ, Crotty LE, Casazza JP, Kuruppu J, Migueles SA, Connors M, Roederer M, Douek DC, Koup RA. Expression of CD57 defines replicative senescence and antigen-induced apoptotic death of CD8+ T cells. Blood. 2003;101:2711–2720. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Focosi D, Bestagno M, Burrone O, Petrini M. CD57+ T lymphocytes and functional immune deficiency. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87:107–16. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0809566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chattopadhyay PK, Betts MR, Price Da, Gostick E, Horton H, Roederer M, De Rosa SC. The cytolytic enzymes granyzme A, granzyme B, and perforin: expression patterns, cell distribution, and their relationship to cell maturity and bright CD57 expression. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;85:88–97. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0208107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nielsen CM, White MJ, Goodier MR, Riley EM. Functional Significance of CD57 Expression on Human NK Cells and Relevance to Disease. Front Immunol. 2013;4:422. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.White MJ, Nielsen CM, McGregor RHC, Riley EM, Goodier MR. Differential activation of CD57-defined natural killer cell subsets during recall responses to vaccine antigens. Immunology. 2014;142:140–150. doi: 10.1111/imm.12239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levacher M, Hulstaert F, Tallet S, Ullery S, Pocidalo JJ, Bach Ba. The significance of activation markers on CD8 lymphocytes in human immunodeficiency syndrome: staging and prognostic value. Clin Exp Immunol. 1992;90:376–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1992.tb05854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eller Ma, Currier JR. OMIP-007: phenotypic analysis of human natural killer cells. Cytom A. 2012;81:447–9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mahnke YD, Beddall MH, Roederer M. OMIP-013: differentiation of human T-cells. Cytom A. 2012;81:935–6. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mahnke YD, Beddall MH, Roederer M. OMIP-019: quantification of human γδT-cells, iNKT-cells, and hematopoietic precursors. Cytom Part A. 2013;83:676–8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wistuba-Hamprecht K, Pawelec G, Derhovanessian E. OMIP-020: Phenotypic characterization of human γδ T-cells by multicolor flow cytometry. Cytom A. 2014;85:522–4. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gherardin NA, Ritchie DS, Godfrey DI, Neeson PJ. OMIP-021: Simultaneous quantification of human conventional and innate-like T-cell subsets. Cytometry A. 2014;85:573–575. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

OMIP024 Supplemental material

RESOURCES