Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015 May 9;25(13):2613–2616. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.04.105

Quinolyl analogues of norlobelane: Novel potent inhibitors of [3H]dihydrotetrabenazine binding and [3H]dopamine uptake at the vesicular monoamine transporter-2

Derong Ding a, Justin R Nickell a, Linda P Dwoskin a, Peter A Crooks b,*
PMCID: PMC4457633  NIHMSID: NIHMS689566  PMID: 25991431

Abstract

We have previously shown that quinolyl moieties are attractive structural replacements for the phenyl groups in lobelane. These quinolyl analogues had improved water-solubility over lobelane and retained the potent vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT-2) inhibitory properties of the parent compound, with quinlobelane (4) exhibiting potent inhibition of uptake at VMAT-2 (Ki = 51 nM). However, the VMAT-2 inhibitory properties of quinolyl analogues of norlobelane, which is equipotent with lobeline as an inhibitor of [3H]dopamine (DA) uptake at VMAT-2, have not been reported. In the current communication, we describe the synthesis of some novel des-methyl quinolyl analogues of lobelane that exhibit greater affinity (Ki = 178-647 nM) for the dihydrotetrabenazine binding site located on VMAT-2 compared with lobelane (Ki = 970 nM), norlobelane (Ki = 2310 nM) and quinlobelane (Ki = 2640 nM). The most potent compounds, 14 and 15, also exhibited inhibition of [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 (Ki = 42 nM) which was comparable to both lobelane (Ki = 45 nM) and norlobelane (Ki = 43 nM). Results reveal that binding affinity at VMAT-2 serves as an accurate predictor of inhibition of the function of VMAT-2 for the majority of these analogues. These novel analogues are under consideration for further development as treatments for methamphetamine abuse.

Keywords: Quinolyl analogues of norlobelane, vesicular [3H]dopamine uptake, methamphetamine abuse, VMAT-2

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms689566u1.jpg


Methamphetamine abuse and its complications are a global epidemic and pose a serious international public health concern due to methamphetamine’s high liability for addiction together with a risk for neurotoxicity and long-lasting neurological impairment1,2. Methamphetamine causes a number of medical problems, including myocardial infarction3, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke4, and in some cases fatal hyperthermia5. Moreover, clinical reports suggest that methamphetamine abusers are predisposed to Parkinson’s disease6. Currently, there is no clinically efficacious pharmacotherapy to treat methamphetamine addicts, necessitating the identification of novel therapeutics.

Our previous studies have demonstrated that lobeline (1, Fig. 1), a weakly basic lipophilic alkaloid isolated from Lobelia inflata, decreases the rewarding effects of methamphetamine in a rat behavioral model, 710 and inhibits dopamine (DA) uptake into synaptic vesicles via interaction with the tetrabenazine binding site on the vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT-2).11 However, lobeline has weak potency as an inhibitor of [3H]DA uptake at the vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT-2) and is a relatively nonselective compound with poor drug-likeness properties. Subsequently, we identified lobelane (2, Fig. 1), a chemically defunctionalized analogue of lobeline, as a potent inhibitor of [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 (Ki = 45 nM). Also, the N-demethylated analogue, norlobelane (3, Fig. 1) was found to be equipotent (Ki = 43 nM) with lobelane as an inhibitor of [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2, and both compounds exhibited 10 to 15-fold higher potency and selectivity for inhibition of [3H]DA uptake into synaptic vesicles when compared to lobeline.1215 Although more potent than lobeline, both lobelane and norlobelane exhibited less than optimal water-solubility. Consequently, in the search for more drug-like VMAT-2 inhibitors, we recently reported on a series of novel lobelane analogues in which the phenyl moieties were replaced with heterocyclic rings, such as indolyl, pyridyl, and quinolyl (e.g. compound 4, Fig. 1)15. However, only the quinolyl analogues retained potent VMAT-2 inhibitory properties15, with quinlobelane (4) exhibiting improved water solubility over lobelane and norlobelane, and potent inhibition of [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 (Ki = 51 nM).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of lobeline (1), lobelane (2), norlobelane (3) and quinlobelane (4).

In this respect, the VMAT-2 inhibitory properties of quinolyl analogues of norlobelane (i.e. N-des-methyl analogues) have not been previously studied. In this communication, we report on several des-methyl analogues of quinlobelane and determine affinity for the dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ) binding site on VMAT-2 and inhibition of DA uptake at VMAT-2. Thus, novel 3-quinolyl, 4-quinolyl, and 6-quinolyl analogues of cis-norlobelane were synthesized and evaluated for their inhibition of [3H]DTBZ binding and [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2. We also prepared an N-2,3-dihydroxypropyl derivative of cis-2,6-di-[(2-ethylquinolyl)]-piperidine as a structural analogue of the preclinical candidate GZ-793A16 and evaluated this compound for VMAT-2 inhibitory potency.

The synthesis of the above compounds from the common intermediate cis-N-carbobenzyloxy-2,6-piperidine dicarboxaldehyde (6) is illustrated in Scheme 1, and was based upon our recently reported procedure for the synthesis of cis-2,6-di-(2-quinolylpiperidines17. Starting material 6 was prepared from pyridine-2,6-dicarboxilic acid via a 5-step procedure17 involving initial esterification and exhaustive reduction to dimethyl cis-2,6-piperidine dicarboxylate, followed by N-carbobenzyloxylation, LiBH4 reduction to the 2,6-methylenediol derivative, and finally, Swern oxidation to afford 6. Reaction of 6 with the appropriate phosphonium salt (7–9) afforded the corresponding Wittig product (10–12), which was then N-deprotected in refluxing 6N HCl and reduced with 10% Pd/C to afford the corresponding des-methyl quinlobelane analogues 13–15. The preparation of compound 1618, a structural analogue of the potent VMAT2 inhibitor, GZ-793A (17), which has been extensively studied as a preclinical candidate for treatment of methamphetamine abuse1924, is also shown in Scheme 1. Compound 16 was prepared via a one-step reaction of 1317 with (S)-(−)-glycidol in EtOH in 66% yield. Quinolyl analogues (13–16) were converted to their respective HCl salts using ethereal HCl and evaluated as inhibitors of [3H]DTBZ binding and [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 using preparations of isolated rat brain synaptic vesicles. Inhibition constants (Ki) were obtained and are provided in Table 1.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthetic routes to compounds 13–16.

Table 1.

Inhibition constants (Ki) for analogue-induced inhibition of [3H]DTBZ binding and [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2.

Compound a Structure VMAT-2
[3H]DTBZ Binding Ki (nM); mean ± SEMb [3H]DA uptake Ki (nM); mean ± SEMb
Methamphetamine graphic file with name nihms689566t1.jpg 80100 ± 19500c 2460 ± 8.3c
Lobelane graphic file with name nihms689566t2.jpg 970 ±190c 45 ± 8c
Norlobelane graphic file with name nihms689566t3.jpg 2310 ± 190d 43 ± 2d
Quinlobelane graphic file with name nihms689566t4.jpg 2640 ± 1410d 51± 5d
13 graphic file with name nihms689566t5.jpg 293 ± 35.7 57 ± 5
14 graphic file with name nihms689566t6.jpg 178 ± 14.4 42 ± 1
15 graphic file with name nihms689566t7.jpg 647 ± 86.5 42 ± 9
16 graphic file with name nihms689566t8.jpg 627 ± 127 240 ± 4
a

All compounds were evaluated as their water-soluble HCl salts.

b

Each Ki value represents mean ± SEM from 3–4 animals, with each experiment performed in duplicate.

c

Data from reference 13.

d

Data from reference 15.

Results from the [3H]DTBZ binding assay show that introduction of the quinolyl heterocyclic ring groups to the structure of norlobelane (Ki = 2310 nM) markedly improved affinity for the high-affinity binding site located on VMAT-2 (Table 1). In comparison to quinlobelane (Ki = 2640 nM), compounds 15 (Ki = 647 nM) and 16 (Ki = 627 nM) exhibited 4-fold greater affinity. Compounds 13 (Ki = 293 nM) and 14 (Ki = 178 nM) exhibited affinities for the binding site which were 9- and 15-fold, respectively, greater than that of quinlobelane. Thus, the methyl group present on the central nitrogen atom of quinlobelane compromises affinity for the [3H]DTBZ binding site.

In the vesicular DA uptake assay, the 2-quinolyl analogue, 13 (Ki = 57 nM), the 4-quinolyl analogue, 14 (Ki = 42 nM), and the 6-quinolyl analogue, 15 (Ki = 42 nM) (Table 1), all exhibited similar inhibition of VMAT-2 function when compared to lobelane (Ki = 45 nM), norlobelane (Ki = 43 nM) and quinlobelane (Ki = 51 nM), indicating that neither the quinolyl moiety nor the N-methyl group are critical structural moieties for inhibition of VMAT-2 function. The comparable inhibitory potencies of these isomeric quinolyl analogues on [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 are informative for further structural optimization studies. Interestingly, compounds 13, 14 and 15 were about 6-fold more potent inhibiting [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 compared to the N-2,3-dihydroxypropyl derivative 16.

Of note, all of the compounds had a higher affinity (3 to 15-fold) for inhibition of [3H]DA uptake than for inhibition of [3H]DTBZ binding. However, affinity for the [3H]DTBZ binding site served as an accurate predictor of rank-order of inhibition of [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 for compounds 13, 14 and 16. One exception was compound 15, which displayed the greatest potency in the functional assay, but exhibited the lowest affinity for the [3H]DTBZ binding site. These results suggest that compound 15 may be interacting with a different site on the VMAT-2 protein than the other analogues.

Analogue-induced inhibition of [3H]DTBZ binding was determined as previously described13. Rat whole brain (excluding cerebellum) was homogenized in 20 ml of ice-cold 0.32 M sucrose solution with 7 up-and-down strokes of a Teflon pestle homogenizer (clearance ≈ 0.003″). Homogenates were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 12 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatants were again centrifuged at 22,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Resulting pellets were incubated in 18 ml of ice-cold water for 5 min, and 2 ml of HEPES (25 mM) and potassium tartrate (100 mM) solution were subsequently added. Samples were centrifuged (20,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C), and 20 μl of MgSO4 (1 mM) solution was added to the supernatants. Solutions were centrifuged (100,000 g for 45 min at 4 °C) and pellets resuspended in ice-cold binding assay buffer (25 mM HEPES, 100 mM potassium tartrate, 5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.05 mM EGTA, pH 7.5). Assays were performed in duplicate using 96-well plates. Aliquots of vesicular suspension (15 μg protein in 100 μl) were added to wells containing 5 nM [3H]DTBZ, 50 μl of analogue (1 nM –1 mM), and 50 μl of buffer. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of Ro4-1284 (20 μM). Reactions were terminated by filtration (Packard Filtermate harvester; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) onto Unifilter-96 GF/B filter plates (presoaked in 0.5% PEI). Filters were washed 5 times with 350 μl of ice-cold buffer (25 mM HEPES, 100 mM potassium tartrate, 5 mM MgSO4, and 10 mM NaCl, pH 7.5). Filter plates were dried and bottom-sealed, and each well was filled with 40 μl of scintillation cocktail (MicroScint 20; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences). Radioactivity on the filters was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry (TopCount NXT; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA).

Inhibition of [3H]DA uptake at VMAT-2 was conducted as previously described25 using isolated rat synaptic vesicle preparations. Briefly, rat striata were homogenized with 10 strokes of a Teflon pestle homogenizer (clearance ≈0.003″) in 14 ml of 0.32 M sucrose solution. Homogenates were centrifuged (2000 g for 10 min at 4 °C), and the resulting supernatants were centrifuged again (10,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C). Pellets were resuspended in 2 ml of 0.32 M sucrose solution and subjected to osmotic shock by adding 7 ml of ice-cold water to the preparation, followed by the immediately adding 900 μL of 0.25 M HEPES buffer and 900 μL of 1.0 M potassium tartrate solution. Samples were centrifuged (20,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C), and the resulting supernatant was centrifuged again (55,000 g for 1 h at 4 °C), followed by the addition of 100 μL of 10 mM MgSO4, 100 μL of 0.25 M HEPES and 100 μL of 1.0 M potassium tartrate solution prior to the final centrifugation (100,000 g for 45 min at 4 °C). Final pellets were resuspended in 2.4 ml of uptake assay buffer (25 mM HEPES, 100 mM potassium tartrate, 50 μM EGTA, 100 μM EDTA, 1.7 mM ascorbic acid, 2 mM ATP-Mg2+, pH 7.4). Aliquots of the vesicular suspension (100 μL) were added to tubes containing assay buffer, various concentrations of inhibitor (0.1 nM −10 mM) and 0.1 μM [3H]DA in a final volume of 500 μL. Nonspecific uptake was determined in the presence of Ro4-1284 (10 μM). Reactions were terminated by filtration, and radioactivity retained by the filters was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA).

In conclusion, we report herein a novel series of quinolyl analogues of norlobelane that exhibit potent inhibition of VMAT-2 binding and function. The isomeric quinolines 14 and 15 show similar potency inhibiting vesicular [3H]DA uptake. In addition, all analogues exhibited greater affinity for the DTBZ binding site located on VMAT-2 than lobelane, norlobelane and quinlobelane. With the exception of compound 15, affinity binding data (Ki for [3H]-DTBZ binding) served as an accurate predictor of rank order of inhibition of transporter function in this study. With respect to structure-activity relationships, the N-methyl group appears not to be a structural requirement necessary for interaction with VMAT-2. Surprisingly, the N-2,3-dihydroxypropyl analogue 16, a structural analogue of the preclinical candidate, GZ-793A19, had 4-fold, and 8-fold lower inhibitory potency, respectively, than either 13 or GZ-793A (Ki = 29 nM)19 in the vesicular [3H]DA uptake assay.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Ms. Agripina G. Deaciuc and funding support from NIH grant U01 DA13519.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.Cadet JL, Krasnova IN. International Reviews in Neurobiology. 1. Vol. 88. Elsevier, Inc; 2009. Molecular bases of methamphetamine-inducedneurodegeneration; p. 101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.UNDOC. Annual Report. 2008;2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Westover AN, Nakonezny PA, Haley RW. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;96:49. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O’Connor AD, Rusyniak DE, Bruno A. Med Clin North Amer. 2005;89:1343. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2005.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rusyniak DE, Sprague JE. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:165. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2006.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thrash B, Thiruchelvan K, Ahuja M, Suppirmaniam V, Dhanasekaran M. Pharmacol Rep. 2009;61:966. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(09)70158-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller DK, Crooks PA, Teng L, Witkin JM, Munzar P, Goldberg SR, Acri JB, Dwoskin LP. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;296:1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harrod SB, Dwoskin LP, Crooks PA, Klebaur JE, Bardo MT. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;298:172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller DK, Harrod SB, Green TA, Wong MY, Bardo MT, Dwoskin LP. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002;74:279. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00996-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harrod SB, Dwoskin LP, Green TA, Gehrke BJ, Bardo MT. Psychopharmacology. 2003;165:397. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1289-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Teng L, Crooks PA, Sonsalla PK, Dwoskin LP. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;280:1432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Teng L, Crooks PA, Sonsalla PK, Dwoskin LP. J Neurochem. 1998;71:258. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71010258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng G, Dwoskin LP, Deaciuc AG, Norrholm SD, Crooks PA. J Med Chem. 2005;48:5551. doi: 10.1021/jm0501228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nickell JR, Krishnamurthy S, Norrholm S, Deaciuc G, Zheng G, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;332:612. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.160275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vartak AP, Nickell JR, Chagkutip J, Dwoskin LP, Crooks PA. J Med Chem. 2009;52:7878. doi: 10.1021/jm900770h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vartak AP, Deaciuc AG, Dwoskin LP, Crooks PA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:3584. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.04.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Horton DB, Zheng G, Siripurapu KBA, Deaciuc AG, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 2011;339:286. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.184770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ding DR, Dwoskin LP, Crooks PA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013;54:5211. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.07.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Spectroscopic data for compounds 14–16. Compound 16: colorless oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08-7.99 (m, 4H), 7.79-7.62 (m, 4H), 7.51–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 2H), 3.77-3.50 (m, 3H), 3.10-2.99 (m, 4H), 2.75-2.56 (m, 6H), 2.18-1.95 (m, 3H), 1.85-1.67 (m, 3H), 1.59-1.42 (m, 4H) ppm, HRMS (EI) Calcd for C30H35N3O2: 469.2729. Found: 469.2732; Compound 14: viscous oil, 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.76 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.75-7.73 (m, 2H), 7.64-7.62 (m, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 2H), 3.18-3.14 (m, 8H), 2.10-1.98 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.78 (m, 3H), 1.58-1.31 (m, 3H). HRMS (EI) Calcd for C27H29N3: 395.2361. Found: 395.2364. Compound 15: viscous oil, 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.79- 8.77 (m, 2H), 7.96-7.88 (m, 5H), 7.37-7.23 (m, 5H), 2.79 (br, 3H), 2.62-2.55 (m, 7H), 2.08-1.87 (m, 7H) ppm. HRMS (EI) Calcd for C27H29N3: 395.2361. Found: 395.2359.
  • 19.Beckmann JS, Denehy ED, Zheng G, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP, Bardo MT. Psychopharmacology. 2012;220:395. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2488-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alvers KM, Beckmann JS, Zheng G, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP, Bardo MT. Psychopharmacology. 2012;224:255. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2748-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Penthala NR, Ponugoti PR, Nickell JR, Deaciuc AG, Dwoskin LP, Crooks PA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23:3342. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.03.092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Horton DB, Zheng G, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP. J Neurochem. 2013;127:177. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilmouth CE, Zheng G, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP, Bardo MT. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013;112:29. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meyer AC, Neugebauer NM, Zheng G, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP, Bardo MT. J Neurochem. 2013;127:187. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Teng L, Crooks PA, Dwoskin LP. J Neurochem. 1998;71:258. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71010258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES