IQ Motif-Containing GTPase-Activating Protein 2 (IQGAP2) Is a Novel Regulator of Colonic Inflammation in Mice

Abstract

IQ motif-containing GTPase-activating protein 2 (IQGAP2) is a multidomain scaffolding protein that plays a role in cytoskeleton regulation by juxtaposing Rho GTPase and Ca²⁺/calmodulin signals. While IQGAP2 suppresses tumorigenesis in liver, its role in pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal tract remains unexplored. Here we report that IQGAP2 is required for the inflammatory response in colon. Mice lacking Iqgap2 gene (Iqgap2^-/- mice) were resistant to chemically-induced colitis. Unlike wild-type controls, Iqgap2^-/- mice treated with 3% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in water for 13 days displayed no injury to colonic epithelium. Mechanistically, resistance to colitis was associated with suppression of colonic NF-κB signaling and IL-6 synthesis, along with diminished neutrophil and macrophage production and recruitment in Iqgap2^-/- mice. Finally, alterations in IQGAP2 expression were found in colons of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our findings indicate that IQGAP2 promotes inflammatory response at two distinct levels; locally, in colonic epithelium through TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, and systemically, via control of maturation and recruitment of myeloid immune cells. This work identifies a novel mechanism of colonic inflammation mediated by signal transducing scaffolding protein IQGAP2. IQGAP2 domain-specific blocking agents may represent a conceptually novel strategy for therapy of IBD and other inflammation-associated disorders, including cancer.

Introduction

The goal of this study was to determine the contribution of IQ motif-containing GTPase-activating protein 2 (IQGAP2) to inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, the central disease-causing feature of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD has been estimated to affect up to 1.4 million people in the United States [1], although its incidence is underreported due to the fact that the onset of illness is often gradual and the differential diagnosis is broad. The causes and mechanisms of this debilitating disorder are not well understood, and curative agents are not available. Both genetic and environmental factors influence susceptibility to IBD. This applies to both major forms of IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD).

IQGAP2 is a 180 kDa cytoplasmic multidomain scaffolding protein that belongs to a protein family consisting of three highly homologous members, IQGAP1, IQGAP2 and IQGAP3 [2]. The domain structure of IQGAPs includes an actin-binding calponin homology (CH) domain, a WW domain, four IQ motifs, and a GTPase-binding domain (GBD) responsible for binding Rho GTPases Rac1 and cdc42 [2]. Despite their similar structure, IQGAP1 and IQGAP2 appear to play opposing roles in vivo. IQGAP1 is the most extensively studied member of the family and has been identified as a bona fide oncogene that promotes tumorigenesis in various cancers, including colorectal [3–5]. In contrast, IQGAP2 acts as a tumor suppressor in the liver by regulating Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/Akt signaling [6, 7]. Mice lacking both Iqgap1 and Iqgap2 display relative protection against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and longer survival compared to Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, implying that at least in the liver IQGAP1 antagonizes activity of IQGAP2 [6]. The tumor suppressing repertoire of IQGAP2 has been recently expanded to two additional cancer types: gastric [8, 9] and prostate [10]. IQGAP2 has also been shown to be important in platelets as an integrator of Rho GTPase and Ca²⁺/calmodulin signals with cell adhesive and cytoskeletal reorganizational events [11]. Yet, physiological functions of IQGAP2 remain understudied and its role in chronic inflammation and pathogenesis of IBD has not been addressed.

Here we show for the first time that ablation of the Iqgap2 gene leads to protection from dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Lack of inflammatory response observed in Iqgap2 ^-/- colon appears to be multifactorial and may be explained by the inhibited colonic Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/NF-κB signaling and subsequent abrogation of IL-6 synthesis, along with diminished neutrophil and macrophage production and their recruitment to the site of injury.

This study thus describes a novel role of IQGAP2 in mediating the inflammatory and immune response of the colon and provides new insights into the mechanisms of IBD pathogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The use of murine models and experimental protocols within this study was approved by the Stony Brook University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The study involving de-identified patient colon biopsy specimens reported here has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Stony Brook University before the study began. The IRB waived the need for written informed consent from the participants per 45CFR46.116.d.

Mice

Generation of Iqgap2 ^-/- conventional knockout mouse model was described previously [6]. Briefly, in order to generate the Iqgap2 null allele, a 36,241-bp genomic fragment of the mouse Iqgap2 gene spanning exons 18 to 30 and corresponding to the IQ3 and IQ4 motifs and GBD domain was replaced with a neomycin resistance gene via site-specific homologous recombination. Iqgap2 ^-/- progeny were born at normal Mendelian ratios, were fertile and clinically normal. Iqgap2 ^-/- mice were maintained on 129 genetic background. Female 8- to 16 week old wild-type (WT) and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice were used in all animal experiments. Mice were maintained on a regular 12-hour light-dark cycle under standard conditions and were provided with food and water ad libitum.

Patient colonic biopsy specimens

Paired human colitis and normal colon needle biopsy specimens obtained from seven patients archived the Stony Brook University BioBank (http://www.stonybrookmedical/center.org/pathology/biobank) were kindly provided by Dr. Jennie Williams (Stony Brook University). The study involving de-identified patient colon biopsy specimens reported here has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Stony Brook University before the study began. The samples were de-identified prior to release to the researchers and qualified for a waiver of consent per 45CFR46.116.d. In this cohort, two patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and five with Crohn’s disease. The average subjects’ age was 36 years and the M/F ratio was 2/5.

DSS treatment and colitis clinical scoring

For acute colitis induction, age-matched WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice were given 3% (wt/vol) DSS (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH) in water ad libitum for up to 13 days. Control mice received regular water without DSS. Mice were divided into two groups: one group was euthanized on day 13 of DSS treatment, and the other group was allowed to recover from DSS treatment by replacing DSS on day 13 with regular water for 7 more days. Mice in both groups were weighed daily and changes in body weight were calculated as follows: body weight change (%) = [(weight on a given day (days 0–13)—weight on day 0)/weight on day 0] X 100. Mice also were monitored daily for stool consistency and signs of occult bleeding. Upon euthanasia, the entire large intestines were removed and the distance from the ileocecal junction to the rectum was measured as a marker of the severity of colitis. Colitis clinical scoring, expressed as a disease activity index (DAI), utilized a system that combines weight loss, stool consistency and signs of intestinal bleeding [12]. Each category’s score ranged from 0 to 4, resulting in a minimal colitis clinical score of 0 and a maximal score of 12.

Histology, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

The entire colon from the cecum to the rectum of WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice was removed, flushed with modified Bouin’s fixative (50% ethanol, 5% acetic acid), and cut-open longitudinally for gross examination. The colons were then Swiss-rolled and incubated in 10% formalin overnight at room temperature for subsequent embedding in paraffin wax, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and histological analysis. Images of colon sections were captured using a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope. To identify goblet cells, the Alcian Blue Staining Kit (Biocare Medical) was used.

For immunohistochemistry (IHC), 5-μm colonic tissue sections were de-paraffinized in xylene, incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol at room temperature for 30 minutes, rehydrated in ethanol gradient (100%, 95%, 70%), and treated with 10 mM Na citrate buffer, pH 6.0, at 120°C for 10 minutes in a pressure cooker. Sections were then incubated in a blocking buffer (5% BSA in TBS-Tween) at 37°C for 1 hour, followed by treatment with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight in a humidified chamber. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal IQGAP1 (BD Biosciences) at 1:300 dilution; rabbit monoclonal IQGAP2 (D1X8, Cell Signaling) at 1:200; rabbit polyclonal NF-κB (p65) (sc-372, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) at 1:300; mouse monoclonal phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705) (Cell Signaling) at 1:200; rabbit polyclonal Chromogranin A (CgA) (Epitomics) at 1:500; goat polyclonal carbonic anhydrase-1 (CA-1) (Santa Cruz) at 1:500; mouse monoclonal TLR4 (abcam) at 1:200; and rabbit polyclonal MyD88 (sc-11356, Santa Cruz) at 1:300. Next day, sections were washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 30 min at 37°C. Betazoid DAB (Biocare Medical, CA, USA) was used to reveal IHC staining in tissues. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted in Cytoseal-XYL mounting medium (Fisher Scientific).

For immunofluorescence (IF), tissue sections were processed as above prior to incubation with primary antibodies. The antibodies included untagged rabbit polyclonal antibodies against CC3 (Cell Signaling) and Ki67 (Novocastra, Leica Microsystems, IL), both at 1:200, and also PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse IL-6 (BD Biosciences) at 1:100, rat anti-mouse AlexaFluor 488-conjugated F4/80 (Invitrogen) at 1:100, FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse Ly-6G (BD Biosciences) at 1:100, and FITC-conjugated hamster anti-mouse CD11c (BD Biosciences) at 1:100. For double IF staining, two primary antibodies, specific for IL-6 and either F4/80 or Ly-6G, were used simultaneously at 1:100 dilution each. To detect untagged CC3 and Ki67 primary antibodies, anti-rabbit AlexaFlour 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen) was used. To visualize nuclei, slides were counterstained with DAPI (Fisher Scientific). Slides were mounted in Prolong gold antifade (Life Technologies) and examined under a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope, and representative images were captured.

For quantification of IL-6, F4/80, Ly-6G, CD11c, CC3, Ki67 and CgA expression in colonic mucosa, positive cells were counted in at least 6 randomly selected fields at 200 X by two independent investigators who were blinded to mouse genotype and treatment.

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from fresh colonic tissue using the TRIzol method (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Alternatively, total RNA from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) colons was extracted using FFPE RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using 10 ng of RNA, QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit and QuantiTect Primer Assays, cat. #QT00098875 for mouse IL-6, and cat. #QT00106169 for mouse IL-10 (Qiagen), as per manufacturer’s protocol. The mRNA abundance was determined from triplicate assays performed in parallel for each primer pair and calculated using the comparative threshold cycle number [13]. The abundance of mRNA of the target genes was normalized to β-actin expression. Relative expression of genes of interest was measured using the ΔΔCt method [14].

Protein extraction and immunoblotting

Freshly isolated colons were flushed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cut longitudinally and scraped to isolate colonic mucosa. Tissues were homogenized and sonicated in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% Na deoxycholate) supplemented with protease inhibitors. After centrifugation at 35,000 g for 15 min, 10 μg of the supernatants were separated on 4–15% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) and probed at 4°C overnight with the following mouse monoclonal primary antibodies: IQGAP1 (BD Biosciences) at 1:1000 dilution; IQGAP2 (sc-55525, Santa Cruz) at 1:1000; β-actin and α-tubulin (Sigma Aldrich) at 1:2000. Blots were washed and probed with anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at 37°C for 1 hour. Chemiluminescent detection was used to visualize protein bands.

Statistical analysis

For all analyses, differences in means between groups were analyzed by a two-tailed Student’s t test using a P value of 0.05 as a measure of statistical significance. Error bars in graphs denote SEM unless otherwise indicated. Meta-analysis of IQGAP2 expression in various human and mouse RNA microarray datasets was conducted using the following online tools: GEO2R (www.ncbi.nlb.nih.gov), Illumina NextBio data analysis platform (www.nextbio.com), and ExpressionBlast platform (www.expression.cs.cmu.edu/index.html).

Results

Iqgap2 ^-/- colons display goblet cell hyperplasia

Despite their high degree of homology, IQGAP1 and IQGAP2 proteins display distinct expression levels in WT mouse digestive tract (Fig 1A and S1 Fig). Both isoforms are expressed in the colon and, noteworthy, Iqgap2 ^-/- colons do not show a compensatory increase in the levels of IQGAP1 (S1 Fig). At the cellular level, IQGAP1 appeared to be ubiquitous in the colonic epithelium, showing positive staining at membrane and cytoplasm, while IQGAP2 expression was restricted to the lateral and basolateral sides of the luminal terminally differentiated colonic epithelial cells (Fig 1B). IQGAP2 seems to be dispensable for normal colonic epithelial homeostasis based on unaltered baseline morphology of Iqgap2 ^-/- colons. The exception is mucin-secreting goblet cells in Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic crypts (S2 Fig). The number of goblet cells per crypt was found to be elevated up to 2-fold in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons when compared to WT controls. Individual goblet cells also appeared enlarged in Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic crypts (S2 Fig). This implies that mucin biogenesis and/or goblet cell differentiation may be abnormal in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons and IQGAP2 may be required for tight control of intestinal epithelial differentiation, which requires further investigation.

Fig 1. IQGAP2 expression in organs of the digestive system.

A. Immunoblot of digestive tract organs from wild-type (WT) and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, probed for IQGAP2 and β-actin as a control for equal protein loading. Representative blots of N = 3 per genotype are shown. B. IHC of IQGAP1 and IQGAP2 in WT (panels a, b) and Iqgap2 ^-/- (panels c, d) mouse colon. Magnification is 200X.

Complete loss of Iqgap2 gene in mice leads to protection from DSS-induced colitis

IQGAP2 has been shown to have an anti-proliferative effect in vitro in human prostate cancer [10] and hepatocellular carcinoma [15] cell lines. It was hypothesized here that ablation of IQGAP2 may induce cell proliferation, and the effect may be distinct in colon due to its significant levels of IQGAP2 expression. Increased proliferation rates, in turn, may be beneficial for the repair of colonic injury and defense against colitis. Iqgap2 ^-/- knockout mouse model represented the unique tool to test this hypothesis.

To elucidate a physiological role of IQGAP2 in the colon, Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, along with WT controls, were subjected to 3% DSS in drinking water for up to 13 days to induce acute colitis as outlined in Fig 2A. DSS-induced colitis is a well-established animal model of mucosal inflammation that is widely used in preclinical studies of IBD [16]. The extended duration of DSS treatment was chosen because mice of the 129 genetic background are known to be less sensitive to DSS compared to C57BL/6 strain, which usually develops severe colitis within 7 days of treatment [17]. The extent of DSS-induced colitis was measured by assessment of colon length and clinical scoring. Of note, Iqgap2 ^-/- mice in these experiments had slightly higher baseline body weight compared to WT, although the difference was not statistically significant (Fig 2B). At day 8 of DSS treatment, WT mice began showing signs of diarrhea and weight loss (Fig 2C, left panel), while Iqgap2 ^-/- mice maintained their regular weight and normal stool consistency. At day 10, fecal occult blood was detected in WT, but not in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice. By day 13, the termination point of DSS experiment, WT mice lost 10% of total body weight (Fig 2C, left panel) and 46% of the colon length on average (Fig 2D), while the body weight of Iqgap2 ^-/- mice remained unchanged compared to the baseline levels before treatment. Iqgap2 ^-/- mice displayed a mild (16%) decrease in the colon length upon DSS treatment. While the baseline colon length of the untreated Iqgap2 ^-/- mice was found to be slightly higher than that of WT controls (Fig 2D), which is probably attributable to the somewhat larger size of Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, normalization to the baseline (untreated) levels nevertheless confirms that DSS treatment causes significantly more severe loss of colon length in WT compared to Iqgap2 ^-/- mice (S3 Fig). Overall colitis clinical score was determined at 10 ± 1.8 for WT mice (with 12 being the maximal possible score) and 0.6 ± 0.7 for Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, indicating severe colitis in WT and its absence in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice (Fig 2E). At the histological level, DSS caused extensive tissue damage in WT colons, characterized by extensive areas of colonic epithelium loss and ulceration (Fig 2F, panels a, b). Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic epithelium remained essentially undamaged (Fig 2F, panels c, d). Remarkably, in the colon of WT mice exposure to DSS up-regulated IQGAP2 protein levels and also altered its distribution, expanding its expression pattern from the luminal colonic epithelial cells in untreated controls, to colonocytes throughout the entire length of the crypt in DSS-treated WT mice (S4 Fig). This may reflect a potential involvement of IQGAP2 in a cellular response to the oxidative stress triggered by DSS treatment. Overall, Iqgap2 ^-/- mice displayed significant resistance to DSS-induced colitis as evident by maintenance of a normal body weight, intact colonic morphology and lack of clinical symptoms.

Fig 2. Physiological and histological evidence of resistance to DSS-induced colitis in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice.

A. Schema of a DSS treatment experiment. DSS at the concentration of 3% was administered in drinking water for up to 13 days. A separate group of mice was treated with 3% DSS for 13 days and then allowed to recover on regular water for 7 days. B. Baseline body weight of untreated WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice. The difference between genotypes is not statistically significant (p = 0.1059). C. In contrast to the WT control group, Iqgap2 ^-/- mice did not lose weight as a result of DSS treatment (left panel); after a 7-day recovery period, WT mice restored 95% of their baseline weight before DSS treatment (right panel). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between genotypes are indicated with asterisks. Resistance of Iqgap2 ^-/- mice to experimental colitis is also demonstrated by colon length (D) and low colitis disease activity index (DAI) (E). F. Histological evidence (H&E) of the absence of colitis in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice. While DSS treatment resulted in an expansive colonic epithelium loss (black arrows) in WT colons (panels a, b), Iqgap2 ^-/- colons were minimally affected (panels c, d). N = 5 per group per experiment; experiment was repeated three times; the results of one representative experiment are shown.

To determine whether IQGAP2 also plays a role during recovery from DSS-induced colonic injury, separate groups of Iqgap2 ^-/- and WT mice were allowed to recover for 7 days after DSS treatment. Consistent with the results in the acute colitis model described above, Iqgap2 ^-/- mice showed no signs of colitis after a 7-day recovery period, while WT mice showed only a partial recovery, with body weights at 95% of the basal levels and small unrepaired areas of colonic epithelium still present (Fig 2C, right panel and S5 Fig).

Iqgap2 ^-/- colons display suppressed NF-κB signaling

Activation of NF-κB signaling has been detected in colonic biopsy samples from patients with both UC and CD [18] and also in mouse colons affected by DSS-induced colitis [19]. Additionally, it has been shown that IQGAP2 physically interacts with NF- κB in vitro [20]. Since Iqgap2 ^-/- mice demonstrate a strong protective phenotype against DSS insult, activity of NF-κB pathway was assessed next in this mouse model. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed that expression levels of the p65 subunit of NF-κB were diminished in Iqgap2 ^-/- colon compared to WT at baseline in untreated animals (Fig 3A, panels a, d). DSS had no effect on p65 levels in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons, while it markedly up-regulated p65 expression in colons of WT mice, a finding consistent with a DSS-induced inflammatory response reported in mice (Fig 3A, panels b, e). A seven-day recovery period following DSS exposure restored colonic p65 levels to baseline levels seen before DSS treatment in WT colons, whereas its levels in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons were unchanged (Fig 3A, panels c, f).

Fig 3. Suppression of NF-κB signaling in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons.

A. IHC shows decreased baseline levels of p65 subunit of NF-κB in Iqgap2 ^-/- colon compared to WT (panels a, d). While DSS treatment resulted in elevated levels of p65 in WT colon, it failed to elicit the same response in Iqgap2 ^-/- colon (panel b, e). Termination of DSS treatment results in a restoration of the baseline p65 levels within 7 days in both genotypes (panel c, f). B. IHC of TLR4 in WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- colons before and after DSS treatment. C. IHC of MyD88 in the same samples. Note low levels of both TLR4 and MyD88 in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons after DSS exposure (panels d). A representative image of N = 5 per genotype is shown for each IHC. Magnification is 200 X.

NF-κB stability and activation are primarily regulated by signaling through TLRs [21], a class of pattern recognition receptors involved in the adaptive and innate immune responses [22]. TLR4 is expressed in the colon and its aberrant signaling has been implicated in IBD [23]. It is the main receptor for gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the mouse gut [24]. It is also a major TLR in macrophages [25]. To further investigate the observed suppression of NF-κB activation in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons, levels of TLR4 and its adaptor protein MyD88 were assessed by IHC. The baseline colonic levels of both TLR4 and MyD88 were indistinguishable between genotypes in untreated animals. Interestingly, while DSS caused overexpression of TLR4 and MyD88 in WT colons, the levels of these proteins remained low in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons (Fig 3B and 3C, respectively).

IL-6 production in response to DSS is suppressed in Iqgap2 ^-/- colon

NF-κB realizes its central role in the inflammatory response in part through the control of Il-6 gene expression [26]. One of the proposed mechanisms of IBD involves inappropriate response to resident microbes in the gastrointestinal tract that leads to overproduction of many pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 [27]. Exposure to DSS has been shown to affect levels and activity of numerous cytokines in colonic mucosa and immune cells in mice [28]. We therefore proposed that the observed Iqgap2 ^-/- phenotype may be a result of an inhibited pro-inflammatory cytokine production in these mice. To test this, cytokine expression profile was analyzed by qRT-PCR in untreated, DSS-treated and DSS+Recovery colonic tissue samples from Iqgap2 ^-/- and WT mice. Before DSS treatment, there were no differences in colonic mRNA levels of IL-6 and IL-10, important modulators of colitis-induced inflammatory response [29], between the genotypes (Fig 4A). However, while DSS induced expression of colonic IL-6 over 20 fold in WT mice compared to untreated WT controls, it failed to stimulate IL-6 production in colons of Iqgap2 ^-/- mice (Fig 4A, left graph). Conversely, mRNA levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were 5-fold higher in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons compared to WT in response to DSS treatment (Fig 4A, right graph). Both IL-6 and IL-10 expression returned to the baseline levels in WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- colons following a seven-day recovery period after DSS treatment (Fig 4A). Next, IHC in colon sections using an IL-6-specific antibody showed a significant increase in the numbers of IL-6-positive cells in DSS-treated WT compared to DSS-treated Iqgap2 ^-/- mice (Fig 4B and 4C).

Fig 4. Iqgap2 ^-/- colons are characterized by diminished production of IL-6 in response to DSS treatment.

A. IL-6 (left) and IL-10 (right) mRNA cytokine levels as quantified by qRT-PCR in colons from WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice from the three groups: untreated, treated with DSS, and treated with DSS and allowed to recover for 7 days, N = 3 per group per genotype. The levels of IL-6 mRNA in DSS-treated Iqgap2 ^-/- colons were beyond the sensitivity of the method used. Data are presented as a transcript fold change relative to actin mRNA transcript levels. B. IF showing reduced IL-6 production (red) in DSS-treated Iqgap2 ^-/- colons (panel c) compared to DSS-treated WT (panel a). White arrows indicate representative IL-6-positive cells. Panels b and d show corresponding DAPI staining. Magnification is 200 X. Images are representative of N = 3 per genotype. C. Quantification of IF IL-6 positive cells in colons from WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice from the three groups: untreated, treated with DSS, and treated with DSS and allowed to recover for 7 days. Data represent an average of ten randomly selected fields per sample ± SD. N = 3 per genotype/treatment. P-values indicating statistically significant differences are shown. D. IHC for phospho-STAT3(Tyr705) in WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- colons before and after DSS treatment, N = 5 per group. Representative pSTAT3-positive cells are pointed with black arrows. Magnification is 200 X.

In the colon, IL-6 realizes its pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects through its key mediator, transcription factor STAT3 [30, 31]. IL-6 binding to its receptors causes activation of STAT3 via phosphorylation by JAK2 kinase [32]. Consistent with decreased IL-6 production, upon DSS treatment Iqgap2 ^-/- colons had a very low number of cells positive for STAT3 phosphorylated at Tyr705 compared to DSS-treated WT controls (Fig 4D), which is indicative of lack of STAT3 activation. WT colons displayed intense nuclear pSTAT3 staining in areas of epithelial damage from DSS-induced colitis and, unlike Iqgap2 ^-/- colons, in the stroma. Interestingly, upon DSS treatment, Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic mucosa demonstrated levels of apoptosis similar to those of WT controls as evident by numbers of cleaved caspase-3 (CC3)-positive cells (S6A and S6B Fig). However, significant reduction of apoptosis levels compared to WT controls was detected in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons after a seven-day recovery period following DSS exposure (S6 Fig). There were also no significant differences in epithelial cell proliferation levels between the genotypes based on Ki67 IHC before or after DSS treatment (S7 Fig). Normalization to the levels in untreated colons revealed no difference in the number of Ki67-positive cells between genotypes in the DSS+Recovery group (S7 Fig).

Iqgap2 ^-/- mice have decreased levels of macrophages and neutrophils in comparison to WT mice

In intestine, the major IL-6 producers are dendritic cells, macrophages and T-cells [30]. The contribution of innate immunity to IBD remains an area of intense debate. Macrophages and dendritic cells are considered important factors in regulating the onset of IBD. DSS-induced colitis in mice also has been shown to be driven primarily by myeloid innate immune cells, as disease can occur in T and B cell-deficient mice [33]. To determine whether diminished IL-6 levels in Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic mucosa upon exposure to DSS reflect either lower numbers of infiltrating immune cells or inhibited activity of these cells (hence inability to produce IL-6), IHC was conducted in Iqgap2 ^-/- and WT colon sections from untreated, DSS-treated and DSS+Recovery groups of mice using markers specific to macrophages (F4/80), neutrophils (Ly-6G) and dendritic cells (CD11c) (Fig 5A and S8 and S9 Figs). The numbers of cells positive for the three markers studied were indistinguishable between WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- colons from untreated mice (Fig 5A). However, colonic mucosa from WT mice showed a significant (up to 10-fold) increase in infiltration by all three myeloid cell types following DSS treatment (Fig 5A), yet Iqgap2 ^-/- colons were largely devoid of these infiltrating immune cells. The nature of IL-6-producing cells in colons studied was confirmed by double IF staining simultaneously using antibodies against IL-6 and either F4/80 or Ly-6G (S9 Fig). As a result, both colonic macrophages and neutrophils were identified as IL-6-producing in mice of both genotypes in these experiments. These findings suggest a defect in either immune cell recruitment/homing or their maturation in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice.

Fig 5. Reduced production of white blood cells (WBC) in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice.

A. Quantification of positive cells as a result of IF shows significantly decreased numbers of infiltrating macrophages (F4/80), neutrophils (Ly-6G) and dendritic cells (CD11c) in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons compared to WT following DSS treatment. The number of positive fluorescent cells was obtained by counting cells in six randomly selected fields per colon sample from WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice from the three groups: untreated, treated with DSS, and treated with DSS and allowed to recover for 7 days. B. Complete blood count (CBC) confirms reduced numbers of neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes in circulation in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice treated with DSS. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. N = 3 per genotype/treatment (A), N = 5 per genotype/treatment (B), p-values indicating statistically significant differences are shown.

Analysis of complete blood counts (CBCs) revealed that DSS-treated Iqgap2 ^-/- mice had significantly lower numbers of circulating white blood cells (WBC), including neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes, compared to DSS-treated WT controls (Fig 5B and S10 Fig). The baseline numbers of WBC and neutrophils were also significantly lower in untreated Iqgap2 ^-/- mice compared to untreated WT mice (Fig 5B). Lastly, the number of macrophages isolated from bone marrow of untreated Iqgap2 ^-/- mice was 3-fold lower compared to untreated WT controls (data not shown). This suggests the possibility of an earlier unexplored defect in immune cell maturation in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, which also could explain their protection against DSS-induced colitis. Importantly, bone marrow-derived Iqgap2 ^-/- macrophages showed functional competency comparable to WT controls, as indicated by similar levels of secreted IL-6 and IL-10 and migration ability (not shown). Collectively, these results point to an essential role of IQGAP2 in promoting colonic inflammation and, on a larger scale, in hematopoiesis and innate immunity.

IQGAP2 expression is altered in human colitis

To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the role of IQGAP2 in colonic inflammation and there are no data available on how IBD affects the IQGAP2 protein. To establish relevance of the Iqgap2 ^-/- colitis model to human disease, IQGAP2 protein levels were compared between colonic tissue affected by IBD (both UC and CD) and matching normal colonic tissue from a small cohort of seven patients. IHC revealed that IQGAP2 expression is distinct between the two forms of IBD. IQGAP2 levels were reduced in UC specimens compared to normal mucosa (Fig 6A), yet they were moderately elevated in CD specimens versus normal tissue (Fig 6B). Importantly, infiltrating immune cells, macrophages and neutrophils in particular, were among the cells with the most increased levels of IQGAP2 in inflamed CD colonic mucosa (Fig 6B). Even in UC colons, IQGAP2 diminished expression seemed to be limited to colonic epithelium in comparison to matching unaffected tissue, while IQGAP2 levels were unchanged or elevated in myeloid cell infiltrates (Fig 6A). This hints the possibility that IQGAP2 involvement in colonic inflammation is compartmentalized, with its major role realized through control of myeloid immune cells rather than through colonic epithelium.

Fig 6. IQGAP2 levels in colon specimens of patients with IBD.

A. Two cases of ulcerative colitis (UC): panels a and b represent Case #1, and panels c and d–Case #2. B. Two cases of Crohn’s disease (CD), panels are designated as above. Images are representative of the total of 7 IBD patient cases. Magnification is 200 X.

To gain further insight into IQGAP2 expression in human IBD and colorectal cancer (CRC), we conducted an extensive meta-analysis of published RNA microarray datasets. The results of this analysis are summarized in S1 Table. Among eight different studies, which had data on Iqgap2 available, comparing RNA transcript expression profiles of IBD colonic biopsies and either healthy controls or adjacent unaffected colonic tissue, Iqgap2 levels were minimally decreased in IBD versus either healthy or “unaffected” colonic tissue. While the fold-change decrease was small, ranging from -1.21 to -1.8, the change was consistently statistically significant (S1 Table). UC and CD samples were indistinguishable in terms of Iqgap2 RNA expression. One study out of four focusing on human CRC, which had data on Iqgap2 available, showed a moderate increase (+2.64 fold change, p = 0.0036) in Iqgap2 RNA transcript expression in CRC liver metastasis compared to primary CRC tumors (S1 Table).

Discussion

IBD is a multifactorial disease and the molecular mechanisms driving its pathogenesis are still not fully understood. Previous studies identified IQGAP2 as a tumor suppressor in liver and stomach and as a mediator of several major signaling pathways [reviewed in [34]], although until now its role in gastrointestinal inflammation has not been addressed. Here we report that IQGAP2 is required for the development of acute colitis in mice. We found that Iqgap2 ^-/- mice were protected from colonic injury in the DSS-induced colitis model. Protection from colitis in Iqgap2 ^-/- mice was evident by maintenance of normal body weight, absence of hematochezia and intact colonic epithelium and crypt architecture. While IQGAP2 appears dispensable for normal colonic homeostasis, upon exposure to DSS, Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic mucosa displayed suppressed NF-κB activation and low levels of TLR4, MyD88, IL-6 and pSTAT3(Tyr705) compared to mucosa from DSS-treated WT mice. Yet, Iqgap2 ^-/- colonic cell proliferation and apoptosis rates were similar to those of WT controls. Moreover, our results also indicate that Iqgap2 ^-/- mice had significantly less myeloid infiltrating cells in colons and lower number of circulating white blood cells, including neutrophils and monocytes. The only morphological aberration observed in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons was hyperplasia of goblet cells irrespective of DSS treatment.

The Iqgap2-deficient mouse studied here is a whole body knockout model, which allowed us to uncover IQGAP2 complex function in both colon-specific and systemic inflammatory response. Still, dissecting the precise molecular mechanisms of IQGAP2 involvement in inflammation will require generation of tissue-specific Iqgap2-deficient models. Based on the results of this study, and also the ability of the IQGAP2 scaffold to play the role of a signal transducer in multiple signaling pathways and the recent report of IQGAP2’s ability to directly bind NF-κB [20], we propose that IQGAP2 modulates inflammatory response by functioning as an adaptor protein in the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in both colonic epithelial and stromal cells. We hypothesize that IQGAP2 may positively regulate NF-κB stability and activation through spatial and/or temporal control of MyD88, Rac1 or Akt. NF-κB activation has been shown to occur in a Rac1/PI3K-dependent manner [35–37]. IQGAP2 may regulate NF-κB signaling by stabilizing Rho GTPase Rac1. A recent study in a large cohort of IBD patients identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs10951982 in the Rac1 gene leading to increased Rac1 expression and higher susceptibility to IBD [38]. The same study also showed that a conditional deletion of Rac1 in mouse neutrophils and macrophages resulted in these mice being protected from DSS-induced colitis. Therefore IQGAP2 interaction with Rac1 may be crucial for its role in colonic inflammation.

It is also feasible to propose that IQGAP2 realizes its pro-inflammatory action through interaction with p38 (MAPK) or ERK1/2, both involved in control of NF-κB and cytokine production. While the list of the confirmed binding partners of IQGAP2 remains relatively short, its extensively studied homolog IQGAP1 binds ERK1/2 through its WW domain and MEK1/2 and Akt through the IQ motifs [39, 40]. Since IQGAP1 and IQGAP2 IQ motifs share 72% of their amino acids, it is conceivable that IQGAP2 is capable of binding these kinases as well. Finally, recent studies have implicated the Hippo signaling pathway in self-renewal and repair of the intestinal epithelium [41, 42]. We reported recently that Iqgap2 ^-/- livers display strong activation of Yes-associated protein (YAP), a downstream transcriptional co-activator of the Hippo pathway [43], although given the normal levels of cell proliferation in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons, IQGAP2 involvement in colonic Hippo signaling seems unlikely.

Expression of TLRs by intestinal epithelial cells is generally low, but during intestinal inflammation it increases in all forms of IBD [44]. Consistently, in the current study, TLR4 and MyD88 levels were elevated in WT colons in response to DSS treatment in our experiments, but not in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons. This may be explained by documented lack of inflammation in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons, as well as by a positive feedback loop driven by cytokines whose levels are also low. On the other hand, IQGAP2-mediated regulation of TLR4 expression is also possible. It also would be of interest to assess the contribution of gut microbiota in Iqgap2 deficiency to NF-κB expression levels and further studies with germ-free Iqgap2 ^-/- mice are warranted to address this.

An imperative question that arose from our study is whether IQGAP2’s function in inflammation is compartmentalized in the body, with it playing distinct roles in colonic epithelium versus immune cells. Our results show that IQGAP2 may be capable of both: aiding the development of colitis through a direct function in colonic epithelium and in a more indirect manner, through modifying neutrophil/macrophage maturation, their inflammatory recruitment and migration, and overall innate immune response. CBCs of Iqgap2 ^-/- mice (Fig 5B), IQGAP2 protein expression pattern observed in human colitis biopsy specimens (Fig 6) and data on the conditional deletion of Rac1 in mouse neutrophils and macrophages [38] suggest that the neutrophil/macrophage axis may be the predominant one in IQGAP2’s pro-inflammatory function. Tissue-specific phenotypes of macrophages are the result of irreversible differentiation programs that are controlled by lineage-specific transcription regulators or, as an alternative, they can be based on reversible functional polarization programs controlled by multiple transcriptional regulators [45]. IQGAP2 may be such a regulator, temporally and spatially controlling macrophage maturation and polarization programs in response to specific stimuli in different tissues. IQGAP2 may realize this function through the TLR4/NF-κB pathway, since TLR interactions are known to trigger macrophage maturation [46]. Significant hyperplasia of goblet cells in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons may also be attributed to control of their differentiation by IQGAP2. Of note, we observed that in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons the baseline levels of CgA and CA-1, an endocrine cell marker and a differentiation marker of colonic enterocytes, respectively, were the same as in WT controls, although upon exposure to DSS, Iqgap2 ^-/- colons had ~ 2.5-fold more cells positive for CgA, (S11 Fig), suggesting an up-regulated endocrine cell differentiation in response to DSS. It remains to be further investigated whether goblet cell hyperplasia alone could be responsible for the protective phenotype of Iqgap2 ^-/- mice. Bone marrow transplants or conditional tissue-specific mice will be employed in the future to distinguish the contribution of hematopoietic vs. extra-hematopoietic cells to the IQGAP2-mediated inflammatory response.

Finally, we speculated that IQGAP2 expression levels in colon may be linked to susceptibility to IBD, and may also be distinct in UC vs. CD. The human Iqgap2 gene is located at chromosome 5, region q13. Thus far, studies into disease-associated mutations in the IQGAP2 gene are lacking. Our pilot analysis of IQGAP2 protein expression in a small cohort of IBD patient colon biopsy specimens produced mixed results (Fig 6).We were able to determine reduced levels of IQGAP2 protein in colonic mucosa of UC specimens (N = 2) compared to normal mucosa. This trait was not evident in CD specimens (N = 5). The mechanisms regulating Iqgap2 gene expression remain largely unexplored, although there is emerging evidence that epigenetic factors may be involved. A microarray gene expression profile of an intestine-specific conditional knockout mouse with deleted histone deacetylase 2 (Hdac2) gene encoding a transcriptional repressor revealed a modest increase in Iqgap2 expression compared to WT controls [47] (S1 Table). Similarly, miR-21-deficient mice showed a small increase in Iqgap2 expression in colonic mucosa versus WT controls [48], suggesting the possibility of regulation of Iqgap2 expression by miRNAs. Lastly, intriguing data have emerged from MyD88 ^-/- mouse studies. It was shown that azoxymethane (AOM)-DSS-induced colitis triggered up-regulation of Iqgap2 expression in MyD88 ^-/- colons and not in the similarly treated WT controls [49] (S1 Table), suggesting that MyD88 or its downstream effectors may negatively regulate IQGAP2 expression.

Unchanged or even modestly decreased levels of Iqgap2 RNA transcript observed in human colitis specimens can be interpreted as follows. Our IHC results in IBD colonic specimens (Fig 6) show that significant changes in IQGAP2 protein expression may be occurring in infiltrating myeloid cells rather than in epithelium and the microarray studies reviewed here do not distinguish between cell types. Further studies of IQGAP2 protein expression in larger specimen cohorts of human IBD of different types and stages are needed to determine whether IQGAP2 plays a role in initiation or maintenance of colonic inflammation, as well as to address IQGAP2 protein stability and epigenetic mechanisms possibly regulating IQGAP2 expression.

In summary, the current study identifies IQGAP2 as a novel regulator of colonic inflammation and also provides evidence that it may play a role in the systemic immune response through control of macrophage maturation and recruitment to the site of injury. Signaling scaffolding proteins such as IQGAP2 represent amenable therapeutic targets due to their domain structure. Synthetic IQGAP2 domain-specific inhibiting peptides make attractive candidates for investigation of potential immunomodulatory properties, since their action would constitute a selective blockage of IQGAP2 interactions with specific binding partners rather than ablation of the entire functional spectrum of IQGAP2. Of note, the first successful inhibition of IQGAP1 homolog using WW domain-mimicking synthetic peptides has been recently reported [50]. The peptides effectively blocked IQGAP1 interaction with ERK1/2, resulting in inhibition of tumorigenesis in mouse models for melanoma, breast and pancreatic cancers. Another study has demonstrated the utility of IQGAP2 IQ motif-mimicking peptides as anti-bacterial agents [51].

In addition to IBD, our findings may be applicable to other chronic inflammation-associated disorders, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, osteoporosis, and cancer.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. IQGAP1 protein expression in organs of mouse digestive tract.

A. Immunoblot showing IQGAP1 expression in organs of mouse digestive tract. B. Densitometric quantification of IQGAP1 protein levels in WT vs. Iqgap2 ^-/- organs normalized to α-tubulin.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Iqgap2 ^-/- colons display a higher number and size of goblet cells compared to WT controls.

A. H&E (panels a, b) and Alcian Blue (panels c, d) stainings. Representative images of N = 3 per genotype are shown. Characteristic crypts with distinct size of goblet cells are circled. B. Numbers of goblet cells were counted per crypt in six random fields and data presented as mean ± SD. A p-value indicating significant difference is shown.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Normalized colon length.

Colon length of WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice from two treatment groups, DSS-treated and DSS+Recovery, was normalized to colon length of untreated mice of respective genotypes.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. DSS exposure causes up-regulation of IQGAP2 protein expression in WT mice.

Representative images of N = 5 are shown. Magnification is 200 X.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. H&E staining of colon sections from WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice from the DSS+Recovery group.

N = 5 per genotype; experiment was repeated three times; the results of one representative experiment are shown. Panels b and d show higher magnification of samples in panels a and c. An unrepaired area of epithelium loss is marked with a black arrow.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Apoptosis analysis of mouse colons after DSS treatment.

A. DSS induces apoptosis at a similar rate in Iqgap2 ^-/- colons compared to WT controls as evident by IF using cleaved caspase-3 (CC3) antibody. Representative images of colon sections from untreated and DSS-treated WT (panels a, c) and Iqgap2 ^-/- (panels b, d) mice are shown. Representative images of colons from the DSS+Recovery group (panels e, f) are also shown. Images are overlays of CC3 IF (green) and DAPI (blue) staining. Images are representative of N = 3 per group. White arrows indicate characteristic CC3-positive cells. B. Quantification of CC3-positive cells in WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- colons from mice from the three treatment groups: untreated, DSS-treated and DSS and Recovery. CC3-positive cells were counted in crypts in six random fields. Data are presented as mean ± SD per crypt. A p-value indicating statistically significant difference is shown. C. Numbers of CC3-positive cells in colons from the DSS and DSS+Recovery groups normalized to numbers of CC3-positive cells in untreated colons.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Cell proliferation analysis of mouse colons after DSS treatment.

A. Ki67 IF of colons from the untreated, DSS-treated and DSS+Recovery mouse groups. Images are overlays of Ki67 IF (green) and DAPI (blue) staining. Images are representative of N = 3 per group. B. Quantification of Ki67-positive cells was conducted as described for CC3 in S6 Fig. Magnification is 200 X. C. Numbers of Ki67-positive cells in colons from the DSS-treated and DSS+Recovery groups normalized to numbers of Ki67-positive cells in untreated colons.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Immunofluorescent staining of mouse colons for F4/80, Ly-6G and CD11c.

Representative images of IF for F4/80 (panels a, b), Ly-6G (panels c, d) and CD11c (panels e, f) using colon sections from DSS-treated WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice, N = 3 per group. Images are overlays of IF with antibodies of interest (green) and DAPI (blue) staining. Magnification is 200 X.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Double Immunofluorescent staining of mouse colons for IL-6 and either F4/80 (A) or Ly-6G (B).

Representative images of IF for IL-6 (red, panels a, e), either F4/80 or Ly-6G (green, panels b, f), and DAPI (blue, panels c, g) using colon sections from DSS-treated WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice are shown, N = 3 per group. Images in panels d, h are overlays of three stainings: IL-6, either F4/80 or Ly-6G, and DAPI. White arrows indicate characteristic positive cells. Magnification is 200 X.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Normalized CBCs of WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice.

CBCs of WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- mice from the DSS-treated group were normalized to CBCs of untreated mice of respective genotypes.

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Immunohistochemical staining of mouse colons for Chromogranin A (CgA) and carbonic anhydrase-1 (CA-1).

A. Representative images of WT and Iqgap2 ^-/- colons untreated and after DSS treatment, N = 5 per group per genotype. Magnification is 200 X. Characteristic positive cells are pointed with black arrows. B. Quantification of CgA-positive cells. Positive cells were counted in six random fields. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P-values indicating statistically significant difference are shown. C. IHC of carbonic anhydrase-1 (CA-1) in the same samples as in A.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Meta-analysis of various RNA microarray datasets.

Meta-analysis was conducted to assess changes in Iqgap2 mRNA levels in human IBD, CRC, and mouse DSS- and AOM-DSS-induced colitis models.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Research Scholar Grant RSG-09-033-01-CSM from the American Cancer Society (to VAS), National Institutes of Health grants DK052230 and DK093680 (to VWY); Sphingolipid Animal Cancer Pathobiology Core grant (P01CA097132), and the Institutional Funding from the Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.