Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0129966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129966

Prevalence and Clustering of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors among Tibetan Adults in China: A Population-Based Study

Shaopeng Xu 1,#, Zepei Jiayong 2,#, Bin Li 2, Hong Zhu 3, Hong Chang 2, Wei Shi 4, Zhengxuan Gao 2, Xianjia Ning 5,‡,*, Jinghua Wang 5,‡,*
Editor: Rachel A Nugent6
PMCID: PMC4457922  PMID: 26047133

Abstract

Objectives

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors has increased worldwide. However, the prevalence and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors among Tibetans is currently unknown. We aimed to explore the prevalence and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors among Tibetan adults in China.

Methods

In 2011, 1659 Tibetan adults (aged ≥18 years) from Changdu, China were recruited to this cross-section study. The questionnaire, physical examinations and laboratory testing were completed and the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking, were counted. The association between the clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors and demographic characteristics, and geographic altitude were assessed.

Results

The age-standardized prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, overweight or obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking were 62.4%, 6.4%, 34.3%, 42.7%, and 6.1%, respectively, and these risk factors were associated with age, gender, education level, yearly family income, altitude, occupation, and butter tea consumption (P < 0.05). Overall, the age-adjusted prevalence of clustering of ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 cardiovascular disease risk factors were 79.4%, 47.1%, and 20.9%, respectively. There appeared higher clustering of ≥2 and ≥3 cardiovascular disease risk factors among Tibetans with higher education level and family income yearly, and those living at an altitude < 3500 m and in a township.

Conclusions

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors, especially hypertension, was high in Tibetans. Moreover, there was an increased clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors among those with higher socioeconomic status, lamas and those living at an altitude < 3500 m. These findings suggest that without the immediate implementation of an efficient policy to control these risk factors, cardiovascular disease will eventually become a major disease burden among Tibetans.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in both developed and developing countries worldwide. The economic burden of coronary heart disease and stroke in 2009 were estimated to be $234 billion in the United States alone [1]. Although the prevalence of CVD risk factors has decreased in some developed countries, the prevalence has increased in developing countries [24].

Statistics from 2010 indicate that CVD is the leading cause of death in China; CVD accounted for nearly 42% of all deaths in 2010. In China, the economic burden of CVD is estimated to be $550 billion from 2005 to 2015[5]. The epidemiologic transition of CVD coincides with the increased prevalence of CVD risk factors, resulting from rapid economic development and lifestyle changes. Several studies have indicated that the prevalence of CVD risk factors have increased in China over past decades [68]. However, most studies of CVD risk factors have been performed in urban Han populations [911], the epidemiology of CVD in minority ethnic populations is lacking.

Recently, several studies on the prevalence of CVD and risk factors in Tibetans have indicated that the burden of CVD and relative risk factors has increased in this population over past decades [1215]. However, these studies were conducted in the population residing at the same altitude, and excluded lamas. Thus, the prevalence and clustering of CVD risk factors among Tibetans residing at different altitudes, including lamas, are currently unknown.

For this study, we performed a population-based survey in a representative population of Changdu, China to evaluate the prevalence of CVD risk factors among Tibetans, including lamas and Tibetans living at different altitudes. We aimed to assess the epidemiology of CVD risk factors in a low-income, low-education Tibetan population.

Methods

Study population

The study population was recruited from the Changdu region in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China from September 2010 to June 2011. There are 11 counties, including142 townships and 11 central temples in the Changdu region with altitudes ranging from 3200 m to 4500 m. More than 95% of residents are Tibetan. A four-stage randomly stratified cluster sampling method was used to select a representative sample of the Tibetan population in China. First, all 11 counties in the Changdu region were stratified into three groups according to altitude: <3500 m, 3500–4000 m, and >4000 m. Second, one county was selected from each altitude group, which included three counties. Third, four townships from each selected county were selected, for a total of 12 townships. Fourth, three villages or neighborhoods from each selected township were selected, resulting in a total of 36 villages or neighborhoods. Moreover, one central temple was selected in each county; all qualified lamas were recruited in the present study. Finally, all residents aged ≥ 18 years from the selected 31 villages, 5 neighborhoods, and 3 central temples were recruited in this survey.

After excluding 135 residents with the confirmed history of CVD, a total of 650 households, including 2175 persons aged ≥ 18 years without a history of CVD (including stroke, angina, and myocardial infarction), in 31 villages, 5 neighborhoods, and 3 central temples met the selection criteria. A total of 1960 residents completed the survey and examination, response rate of 90.1%. Of these, a total of 1659 Tibetans were included in the present study, after excluding 134 residents without complete demographic data and 167 residents of other ethnic.

The ethics committee of Changdu Region People’s Hospital, Tibet approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants during recruitment.

Data collection

The surveys were conducted in the community health station through face-to-face interviews, and physical examinations by trained research staff guided by epidemiology professionals. A few participants took the survey at home. A standardized questionnaire was administered in this survey. Detailed information included demographical information, including gender, age group (18–34 years, 35–44 years, 45–54 years, 55–64 years, ≥ 65 years), occupation (officer, workers, farmers, herdsman, lama, others), and education levels (0 years, 1–9 years, ≥ 10 years); socioeconomic status, including yearly family income (< 800 USD/year, 800–1599 USD/year, ≥ 1600 USD/year); geographical characteristics, including residence ((township, rural/ pastoral area, temple), and altitude (< 3500 m, ≥ 3500 m); life style factors, including cigarette smoking(no, yes) and butter tea consumption (no, yes); and self-reported previous medical history, medication use. The physical examinations included measurement of blood pressure (BP); body height and weight; and circumferences of the waist, hip, and abdomen. Additionally, all participants took an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), fasting glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

Blood pressure measurement and hypertension definition

Subjects were advised to avoid smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol, taking tea or coffee, or engaging in physical activity for at least 30 min before BP measurements. BP measurements were performed in a quiet room by senior physicians, using a calibrated mercury sphygmomanometer (Jiangsu Yuyue Medical Equipment co., Ltd), by the standard method of the American Hypertension Association [16]. Subjects were asked to remain resting in a sitting position for 5 min before testing. BP was recorded as the mean of two measurements taken 5 min apart after resting in the supine position, with cuff size adjusted to arm circumference. The cuff was placed on the arm at the level of the heart. If the difference between the two readings was over 5 mmHg, an additional two readings were obtained after resting for an additional 20 min. Systolic BP and diastolic BP were defined according to Korotkoff sounds I and V.

Hypertension was defined as an average systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or an average diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg and/or self-reported current treatment for hypertension with antihypertensive medication [17].

Body weight and height measurements and obesity definition

Body weight and height were measured to the nearest tenth of a kilogram/meter by standard protocol and techniques, with light clothing and no shoes. Body mass index was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters). According to standard criteria in Chinese adults, overweight and obesity were defined as body mass indices of 24.0–27.9 kg/m2 and ≥28.0 kg/m2, respectively [18].

Laboratory testing

All participants were examined serum lipids (TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C) and plasma glucose levels, which were measured enzymatically in the Clinical laboratory of Changdu Region People’s Hospital, Tibet, which was the certificated laboratory for clinical examination, with reagents from Guangzhou Kefang Company, China using HITACHI 7180 Chemistry Analyzer (HITACHI Company, Japan)[19]. Dyslipidemia was defined as self-reported current treatment with cholesterol-lowering medication or having 1 or more of the following levels: TC ≥ 5.2 mmol/L, TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L, HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L, or LDL-C ≥3.4 mmol/L [20]. Plasma glucose was measured using a modified hexokinase enzymatic method. Individuals without a previous history of diabetes were administered an OGTT with 75 g glucose. Diabetes was defined as having a fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, OGTT ≥ 11.11 mmol/L, a self-reported history of diabetes, or current treatment with antidiabetes medication [21].

Statistical analysis

The data were presented as means (standard difference) for continuous variables, and as percentages (95% confidence interval) for categorical variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test. The prevalence rates of CVD risk factors, which included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and smoking, were standardized using the population according to the China sixth national population census, with the population divided into 9 age–groups: 18–34 years, 35–39 years, 40–44 years, 45–49 years, 50–54 years, 55–59 years, 60–64 years, 65–74 years, and ≥75 years [22]. The prevalence of each CVD risk factor, and CVD risk factor clustering (with 0, ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 CVD risk factors) were described by gender, age group (18–34 years, 35–44 years, 45–54 years, 55–64 years, ≥ 65 years), education levels (0 years, 1–9 years, ≥ 10 years), yearly family income (< 800 USD/year, 800–1599 USD/year, ≥ 1600 USD/year), altitude (< 3500 m, ≥ 3500 m), residence (township, rural/ pastoral area, temple), and butter tea consumption(no, yes). The odd ratio (OR) for age-adjusted prevalence with ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 CVD risk factors were estimated using Poisson regression. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 two tailed. SPSS version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the analyses.

Results

Descriptive characteristics of participants

The descriptive characteristics of all participants in this study are presented in Table 1. In this cross-sectional study, there were a total of 1659 subjects, including 822 (49.5%) men and 837 (50.5%) women; one-third of participants were aged 18–34 years; 59.5% of participants were farmers/herdsmen, and 54.7% lived at an altitude of 3200–3500 m. The education levels were lower both in men and in women, with 60% illiteracy overall. Among all participants, 56.9% had a yearly family income of <800 USD.

Table 1. The demographic characteristics among Tibetans aged 18 years and over in China.

Characteristics Men Women Total
Number, n(%) 822(49.5) 837(50.5) 1659(100.0)
Age, years, means(SD) 41.5(15.0) 46.5(15.1) 44.0(15.2)
Age group, n(%):
 18–34 yrs 299(36.4) 194(23.2) 493(29.7)
 35–44 yrs 194(23.6) 193(23.1) 387(23.3)
 45–54 yrs 161(19.6) 201(24.0) 362(21.8)
 55–64 yrs 105(12.8) 138(16.4) 243(14.7)
 ≥65 yrs 63(7.7) 111(13.3) 174(10.5)
Residence, n(%):
 Township 144(17.5) 251(30.0) 395(23.8)
 Rural/ Pastoral area 353(43.0) 583(69.6) 936(56.4)
 Temple 325(39.5) 3(0.4) 328(19.8)
Altitude, meter, n(%):
 < 3500 444(54.0) 463(55.3) 907(54.7)
 3500–4000 266(32.4) 334(39.9) 600(36.2)
 >4000 112(13.6) 40(4.8) 152(9.1)
Education, n(%):
 0 yrs 394(47.9) 607(72.6) 1001(60.3)
 1–9 yrs 376(45.7) 145(17.3) 521(31.4)
 ≥10 yrs 52(6.3) 85(10.2) 137(8.3)
Occupation, n(%)
 Officer 56(6.8) 93(11.1) 149(9.0)
 Workers 26(3.2) 15(1.8) 41(2.5)
 Farmers 334(40.6) 582(69.5) 916(55.2)
 Herdsman 31(3.8) 40(4.8) 71(4.3)
 Shaman 337(41.0) 7(0.8) 344(20.7)
 Others 38(4.6) 100(12.0) 138(8.3)
Family income yearly, n(%):
 < 800 USD 508(61.8) 436(52.1) 944(56.9)
 800–1599 USD 145(17.6) 162(19.4) 307(18.5)
 ≥1600 USD 169(20.6) 239(28.5) 408(24.6)

Age-standardized prevalence of primary CVD risk factors

Table 2 presents the age-standardized prevalence of the primary CVD risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, overweight or obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking. The corresponding prevalence were 62.4%, 6.4%, 34.3%, 42.7%, and 6.1%, respectively. With the exception of hypertension, the prevalence of these CVD risk factors was greater in men than in women. There were significant increased trends with age in the prevalence of all of these risk factors; except for hypertension, risk factor prevalence showed increased trends with education levels; and except for hypertension and overweight/obesity, risk factor prevalence showed increased trends with yearly family income (P < 0.05). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, overweight/obesity, and current smoking were highest among Tibetans living at an altitude < 3500 m. Concurrently, the prevalence of diabetes and current smoking were higher in those living in a township; moreover, the prevalence of overweight/obesity was greater in lamas than in farmers/herdsmen (P < 0.05).

Table 2. The age adjusted prevalence of CVD risk factors by demographic characteristics among Tibetan adults. a .

Category Hypertension Diabetes mellitus Overweight/Obesity Dyslipidemia Smoking
Total: 62.4(64.6) 6.4(6.8) 34.3(35.6) 42.7(43.8) 6.1(6.1)
Age group:
 18–34 yrs 34.9 b 1.9 b 18.5 b 30.8 b 7.1 b
 35–44 yrs 63.6 4.8 42.9 42.1 5.7
 45–54 yrs 79.0 8.0 45.3 50.6 8.3
 55–64 yrs 87.2 13.3 38.2 49.4 3.7
 ≥ 65 yrs 89.7 13.3 44.1 53.6 2.9
Education level:
 0 yrs 63.8(67.9) 5.4(6.0) b 28.9(30.6) b 39.2(40.8) b 3.9(3.6) b
 1–9 yrs 60.3(59.7) 9.2(8.1) 43.5(43.5) 50.0(49.0) 8.4(8.5)
 ≥ 10 yrs 63.4(59.1) 8.8(7.4) 42.7(41.2) 51.4(45.9) 15.6(15.3)
Family income yearly:
 < 800 USD 61.9(61.7) 4.1(4.1) b 34.3(34.7) 38.8(39.1) b 4.1(4.2) b
 800–1599 USD 67.0(71.7) 5.4(6.3) 38.4(41.3) 43.3(45.4) 8.4(7.8)
 ≥1600 USD 60.7(66.2) 11.3(13.0) 29.8(33.4) 49.9(52.6) 9.6(9.1)
Altitude:
 <3500 m 65.0(68.7) b 7.3(8.4) b 40.1(42.6) b 43.8(46.3) 8.3(8.4) b
 ≥3500 m 59.8(59.7) 4.9(5.0) 26.4(27.1) 40.4(40.9) 3.3(3.3)
Residence:
 Township 63.8(70.1) 9.8(12.5) b 44.6(50.4) b 47.2(52.0) 11.8(11.9) b
 Rural/ Pastoral area 62.0(67.2) 5.3(5.7) 23.1(25.5) 36.6(38.7) 6.7(5.8)
 Temple 63.6(50.6) 4.2(2.6) 59.5(46.9) 49.2(47.9) 0
Butter tea:
 No 62.4(65.2) 6.0(6.1) 44.8(45.3) 62.2(63.1) b 8.5(8.7)
 Yes 62.3(64.6) 6.4(6.8) 33.7(35.2) 41.9(42.9) 6.0(6.0)

a data was presented in adjusted prevalence (rude rate) except for age group.

b indicated P<0.05 for chi-square testing or trend chi-square testing by group.

Age-standardized prevalence of primary CVD risk factors by gender

The prevalence of CVD risk factors increased with age both in men and in women, but differed by demographic and socioeconomic groups. In the higher education level group, there were higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking in men, but higher prevalence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and current smoking in women. In the higher family income group, there were higher prevalence of all these risk factors except for overweight/obesity in men, but higher prevalence of diabetes only in women. Among those living at lower altitude, there were higher prevalence of hypertension, overweight/obesity, and current smoking in men, and overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking in women. Moreover, the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and current smoking were higher among those living in townships, and among men, the prevalence of overweight/obesity was higher in lamas; but only diabetes and overweight/obesity in women. There was a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia in men and current smoking in women among those who did not consume butter tea (Table 3).

Table 3. The age adjusted prevalence of CVD risk factors by demographic characteristics among Tibetan by gender. a .

Hypertension Diabetes mellitus Overweight/Obesity Dyslipidemia Smoking
Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women
Overall: 65.3(64.1) 59.7(65.1) 7.9(7.7) 5.1(5.9) b 41.3(41.1) 27.1(30.1) b 51.1(51.1) 33.0(36.7) b 11.1(11.3) 1.0(1.0) b b b
Age group:
 18–34 yrs 36.8 c 32.0 c 2.5 c 1.1 c 22.8 c 11.9 c 40.8 c 15.6 c 11.0 c 1.0 c
 35–44 yrs 66.5 60.6 5.3 4.3 52.9 32.8 52.9 31.0 10.3 1.0
 45–54 yrs 83.9 75.1 11.7 5.1 54.7 37.7 61.0 42.4 18.0 0.5
 55–64 yrs 88.6 86.2 14.1 12.7 41.8 35.6 44.4 53.0 6.7 1.5
≥ 65 yrs 95.2 86.5 19.0 10.2 55.6 37.2 56.9 51.9 6.3 0.9
Education level:
 0 yrs 66.8(67.3) 61.9(68.4) 6.6(6.9) 4.5(5.4) c 35.5(36.1) c 24.1(27.1) 47.9(48.3) c 32.0(36.0) c 8.5(8.4) c 0.4(0.5) c
 1–9 yrs 61.7(58.5) 56.4(62.8) 9.1(7.9) 11.9(8.6) 46.8(45.3) 35.2(38.9) 52.7(51.7) 38.4(42.0) 10.6(10.6) 3.4(2.8)
 ≥ 10 yrs 77.7(80.8) 53.5(45.9) 9.8(11.5) 11.6(4.8) 48.7(49.2) 36.1(36.5) 66.0(67.3) 45.7(32.5) 35.7(38.5) 1.5(1.2)
Family income yearly:
 < 800 USD 62.7(57.3) c 61.7(66.7) 5.1(4.9) c 2.8(3.1) c 42.8(40.9) c 25.6(27.4) 45.8(46.3) c 39.1(27.6) 7.3(7.1) c 0.9(0.9)
 800–1599 USD 72.6(75.2) 61.3(68.5) 5.1(5.6) 5.4(6.9) 45.1(47.1) 32.6(36.1) 51.6(52.4) 35.1(39.0) 15.9(15.2) 1.6(1.2)
 ≥1600 USD 69.8(75.1) 55.2(59.8) 14.2(17.2) 8.8(10.0) 34.3(36.9) 27.6(30.9) 65.8(63.3) 41.0(45.0) 24.2(20.7) 0.8(0.8)
Altitude:
 <3500 m 70.8(72.5) c 59.1(65.0) 8.5(9.1) 6.4(7.7) 48.1(49.4) c 32.5(36.0) c 51.1(51.8) 36.3(41.1) c 14.8(15.3) c 1.8(1.7) c
 ≥3500 m 59.4(54.2) 60.4(65.2) 6.6(6.2) 3.4(3.7) 31.9(31.4) 20.4(22.8) 48.9(50.3) 28.7(31.4) 6.1(6.6) 0
Residence:
 Township 74.9(81.3) c 58.1(63.7) 12.7(16.7) c 8.4(10.0) c 50.0(57.5) c 41.5(46.3) c 64.6(68.1) c 37.2(42.7) 31.8(29.2) c 1.7(2.0)
 Rural/Pastoral area 65.2(70.0) 60.2(65.5) 8.1(8.5) 3.7(4.1) 26.7(29.3) 19.6(23.1) 45.2(46.2) 31.3(34.2) 16.8(14.4) 0.6(0.5)
 Temple 63.3(50.2) 24.4(100) 4.3(2.6) 0 59.7(46.9) 8.7(50.0) 49.9(46.9) 0 0 0
Butter tea:
 No 76.4(76.7) 43.5(56.4) c 10.0(10.3) 2.4(2.7) 53.8(56.0) 33.2(38.5) 78.7(85.7) c 36.9(47.2) 10.9(10.0) 6.7(7.7) c
 Yes 64.8(63.6) 60.5(65.5) 7.8(7.6) 5.2(6.0) 40.9(49.9) 32.7(36.2) 49.8(49.9) 32.7(36.2) 11.2(11.4) 0.7(0.3)

a data was presented in adjusted prevalence (rude rate) except for age group.

b indicated P<0.05 compared between men and women for chi-square testing.

c indicated P<0.05 for chi-square testing or trend chi-square testing by group.

Age-standardized prevalence in clustering of primary CVD risk factors

Overall, 20.3% of Tibetan adults had no CVD risk factors; this included 14.4% of men and 27.7% of women, and this difference was statistically significant. The prevalence rates of ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 primary CVD risk factors were 79.4%, 47.1%, and 20.9% overall, 82.1%, 54.9%, and 28.9% in men, 72.5%, 38.8%, and 13.7% in women, respectively. The proportion of those without risk factors was higher in women than in men (27.7% vs 14.4%, P<0.001), however, there were higher proportions of those with ≥2 and ≥3 primary CVD risk factors in men than in women (P< 0.001). With increasing age, there was a trend toward increased prevalence rates of ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 primary CVD risk factors both in men and in women (P < 0.001). In men, there was an obvious increased trend toward clustering of ≥2 and ≥3 primary CVD risk factors with increasing education level, yearly family income, and altitude, in addition to butter tea consumption; in women, there was an obvious increased trend toward clustering of ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 primary CVD risk factors with increasing education level and altitude, in addition to residing in township. The prevalence of those with ≥3 primary CVD risk factors was greater among those with higher yearly family income in women, and among those living in a township in men (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4. The age adjusted prevalence with different numbers of CVD risk factors among Tibetan adults. a .

Category 0 Risk factors ≥1 Risk factors ≥2 Risk factors ≥3 Risk factors
Total: 20.3(18.8) 79.4(81.2) 47.1(49.3) 20.9(22.0)
Age group:
 18–34 yrs 39.0 b 61.0 b 25.5 b 8.7 b
 35–44 yrs 16.8 83.2 51.2 22.4
 45–54 yrs 8.7 91.3 62.3 28.7
 55–64 yrs 5.3 94.8 62.7 28.9
 ≥ 65 yrs 6.3 93.8 66.3 35.6
Education level:
 0 yrs 20.5(17.9) 79.5(82.1) 43.7(46.7) b 15.9(17.8) b
 1–9 yrs 18.6(18.6) 81.4(81.4) 52.6(53.1) 29.0(28.1)
 ≥ 10 yrs 20.5(25.4) 79.5(74.6) 59.6(53.7) 32.9(29.9)
Family income yearly:
 < 800 USD 20.5(20.7) 79.5(79.3) 44.5(45.0) 15.3(17.8) b
 800–1599 USD 21.0(18.1) 79.0(81.9) 51.1(55.3) 26.3(29.0)
 ≥1600 USD 19.5(15.1) 80.5(84.9) 50.0(54.3) 22.9(26.1)
Altitude:
 <3500 m 19.2(16.5) 80.8(83.5) 53.6(57.5) b 26.2(28.6) b
 ≥3500 m 21.6(21.4) 78.4(78.6) 39.3(40.0) 14.3(14.6)
Residence:
 Township 20.9(15.6) 79.1(84.4) 55.8(63.5) 30.4(35.7)
 Rural/ Pastoral area 22.1(18.6) 77.9(81.4) 40.3(43.6) 14.1(15.7)
 Temple 17.2(23.3) 82.8(76.7) 61.6(47.9) 31.0(23.3)
Butter tea:
 No 20.3(16.7) 79.7(83.3) 60.0(63.3) b 30.5(31.7) b
 Yes 20.3(18.9) 79.7(81.1) 46.7(48.7) 20.6(21.7)

a data was presented in adjusted prevalence (rude rate) except for age group.

b indicated P<0.05 for chi-square testing or trend chi-square testing by group.

Table 5. The age-adjust prevalence with different numbers of CVD risk factors among Tibetan men and women. a .

0 Risk factors ≥1 Risk factors ≥2 Risk factors ≥3 Risk factors
Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women
Overall: 14.4(14.7) 27.7(22.7) b 82.1(85.3) 72.5(77.3) b 54.9(54.9) 38.8(43.9) b 28.9(28.3) 13.7(15.9) b
Age group:
 18–34 yrs 28.9 c 54.1 c 71.1 c 46.0 c 33.2 c 14.1 c 12.6 c 2.7 c
 35–44 yrs 11.6 22.0 88.4 78.0 60.8 41.4 32.8 11.8
 45–54 yrs 3.3 13.0 96.7 87.1 73.0 53.9 43.4 17.1
 55–64 yrs 4.1 6.1 95.9 93.9 66.0 60.3 27.8 29.8
 ≥ 65 yrs 5.2 6.9 94.8 93.1 72.4 62.7 50.0 27.5
Education level:
 0 yrs 13.7(13.5) 26.4(20.8) 86.3(86.5) 73.6(79.2) 51.7(52.6) c 36.8(43.0) c 23.4(23.7) c 12.0(14.0) c
 1–9 yrs 15.8(17.1) 30.1(22.6) 84.2(82.9) 71.0(77.4) 55.9(54.1) 44.4(50.4) 31.4(29.6) 23.2(24.1)
 ≥ 10 yrs 7.8(7.8) 27.0(36.1) 88.5(92.2) 73.0(63.9) 73.9(76.5) 50.4(40.0) 53.2(52.9) 25.6(15.7)
Family income yearly:
 < 800 USD 16.0(18.8) c 27.4(22.9) 84.0(81.2) c 72.6(77.2) 51.4(49.0) c 35.6(40.3) 24.7(23.1) c 10.1(11.8) c
 800–1599 USD 12.0(13.0) 28.3(22.6) 85.8(87.0) 71.7(77.4) 58.4(60.9) 44.6(50.3) 34.6(36.2) 18.7(22.6)
 ≥1600 USD 5.8(4.8) 27.5(22.6) 94.2(95.2) 72.5(77.5) 65.8(66.1) 41.0(46.0) 33.9(36.3) 16.2(18.7)
Altitude:
 <3500 m 12.7(15.4) 26.4(21.2) 83.6(84.6) 73.6(78.8) 63.3(65.3) c 42.1(50.1) c 35.6(36.6) c 17.8(21.0) c
 ≥3500 m 16.3(18.4) 29.2(24.5) 80.0(81.6) 70.8(75.6) 44.5(43.4) 35.2(36.5) 19.8(19.2) 8.5(9.9)
Residence:
 Township 8.2(5.0) c 27.1(21.8) 91.8(95.0) c 72.9(78.2) 72.7(78.7) 47.9(54.7) c 46.8(51.8) c 22.0(26.3) c
 Rural/ Pastoral area 12.0(10.9) 27.6(23.2) 87.5(89.1) 72.0(76.8) 48.6(51.1) 35.0(39.1) 20.9(22.8) 10.0(11.4)
 Temple 17.3(23.4) 0 82.7(76.6) 17.3(100) 61.9(47.9) 18.7(50.0) 31.2(23.4) 0
Butter tea:
 No 0 c 40.0(27.8) 100(100) c 60.0(72.2) 77.5(79.2) c 40.7(52.8) 40.2(41.7) 19.6(25.0)
 Yes 14.8(15.2) 27.2(22.5) 85.2(84.8) 72.8(77.5) 54.2(54.1) 38.6(43.5) 28.5(27.9) 12.7(15.5)

a data was presented in adjusted prevalence (rude rate) except for age group

b indicated P<0.05 compared between men and women for chi-square testing.

c indicated P<0.05 for chi-square testing or trend chi-square testing by group.

Discussion

This is the first study to report the prevalence and clustering of main CVD risk factors by demographic, geographic, and life style characteristics among Tibetans in China. We assessed the prevalence of CVD risk factors by demographical characteristics, including gender, age groups, education levels, yearly family income; and by geographical features, including occupation, altitude, and butter tea consumption among Tibetans living at altitudes 3200–4500 m in Changdu, China.

Tibetans are an ethnic group with a unique lifestyle characterized by a special local diet of tsampa, butter tea, beef, and mutton, which contain high salts and cholesterols; moreover, the majority of Tibetans reside at high altitudes.

This cross-sectional study indicated that the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking among Tibetan adults were 62.4%, 6.4%, 34.3%, 42.7%, and 6.1%, respectively. The prevalence of these CVD risk factors increased significantly with age, with higher rates in men than in women, with the exception of hypertension. The prevalence rates of diabetes, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking increased with education level; the prevalence rates of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and current smoking increased with yearly family income. Moreover, there appeared to be a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, overweight/obesity, and current smoking in Tibetans living at altitudes < 3500 m than those living at altitudes ≥ 3500 m; there were higher prevalence rates of diabetes and current smoking in those living in townships, and higher prevalence rates of overweight/obesity in lamas, and higher prevalence rates of dyslipidemia in those who did not consumed butter tea.

A previous study indicated that the age-standardized prevalence rates of dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, and overweight in Chinese adults aged 35–74 years were 53.6%, 26.1%, 5.2%, 34.4%, and 28.2%, respectively [23]. Recently, several studies reported a higher prevalence of CVD risk factors in Han adults. In Beijing adults aged 35–74 years in 2007, the prevalence rates of hypertension, diabetes, overweight, dyslipidemia, and current smoking were 36.9%, 6.5%, 36.2%, 35.4%, and 36.3%, respectively [24]. Another cross-sectional survey in rural residents aged 40 years and over in Beijing found that the prevalence rates of hypertension, diabetes, and overweight were 47.2%, 7.7%, and 53.3% in men, respectively, and 44.8%, 8.2%, and 60.7% in women, respectively, from 2008 to 2010 [25]. In the present study, the prevalence rate of hypertension was higher than other minority groups in China (52.6% among Kazaks, 54.6% among Uyghurs) [26,27].

The high prevalence of hypertension in Tibetans in this study may in part be due to unique physiologic changes in residents living at high altitudes, which involve respiratory, cardiovascular, and hematologic adaptations to long-term hypoxemic conditions. In addition, increased hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocytes are associated with the atherosclerotic process and hypertension [28,29]. Moreover, the diets of Tibetans may have contributed in part to the high prevalence of hypertension observed in this study.

The association of socioeconomic factors with CVD risk factors has been indicated in previous studies. The prevalence of diabetes, obesity, smoking, and dyslipidemia decreased with increasing socioeconomic status [3034]. However, the prevalence of diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking in the present study showed an upward trend with socioeconomic status, consistent with a previous report [35]. The delayed economic development in Tibet may explain partly the association between high education levels and yearly family income with the high prevalence of CVD risk factors. Moreover, the socioeconomic classes in this study were stratified according to the local economic development; however, Tibetans are all in a lower socioeconomic class.

A great number of studies have demonstrated that CVD incidence and all-cause mortality increased markedly in the presence of risk factor clustering [36,37]. In National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, the age-, race-, sex-, and education-adjusted relative risks of coronary heart disease in adults with 1, 2, 3, or 4 or 5 risk factors (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, overweight, and current smoking) were 1.6, 2.2, 3.1, and 5.0 during 21 years of follow-up, respectively, compared to those with no risk factors [38].

The studies determined that 80.5%, 45.9%, and 17.2% of Chinese adults had ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 CVD risk factors, respectively. The clustering of risk factors was approximately equal for men and women and increased with age [23]. In the present study, the prevalence rates of clustering of ≥1 and ≥2 CVD risk factors were79.4% and 47.1%, respectively, but the prevalence of clustering of ≥3 CVD risk factors was greater than that reported in a prior study (20.9% vs. 17.2%) [23]. There are fewer Tibetans smoking because of Tibetan Buddhism restrictions, thus, the actual risk of CVD risk factor clustering in Tibetans was greater than that in Han adults.

In the present study, we found that the clustering of CVD risk factors was associated with education level, family income, altitude, occupation, and butter tea consumption. There were greater risks of clustered CVD risk factors in Tibetans with a high education level and family income, those living at altitudes < 3500 m or in a township, and in those who never consumed butter tea.

These results may be explained by the delayed economic development in Tibet and the protected role of tea. However, at the initial stage of rapid economic development in Tibet, the quality of life improved only among Tibetans with higher socioeconomic status. This delayed economic development may drive the greater risk of CVD in the wealthy.

Our study had several limitations. First, the population size was relatively small because of the limited Tibetan population in the region; however, the four-stage randomly stratified cluster sampling method was used to make the study population representative. Second, all participants were from altitudes of ≥3200 m, and we did not include a population at a lower altitude for purposes of comparison. However, we conducted subgroup analyses stratified by altitude (<3500 m and ≥3500 m) for analyses. Third, our study demonstrated that the prevalence of CVD risk factors was associated with yearly family income, but as Tibet is an undeveloped region, the level of economic development in this population was lower overall. Thus, although the level of income in Tibetans is relatively low, yearly family income was stratified into three groups (< 800 USD, 800–1600 USD, and >1600 USD). Finally, because of religious beliefs, Tibetans do not consume alcohol; therefore, we were unable to calculate the prevalence of alcohol consumption as a CVD risk factor.

Conclusion

This is the first cross-sectional study to evaluate the prevalence and clustering of CVD risk factors among Tibetan adults in China. The prevalence of primary CVD risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking, were high in Tibetans. Moreover, there was a greater proportion of clustering of ≥3 CVD risk factors in Tibetans. Poor socioeconomic status and residence situations contribute to Tibetans having a higher CVD risk. Our findings suggest that the incidence of CVD in Tibetans may continue to increase over future decades; without the immediate implementation of an efficient policy to control risk factors, CVD will eventually become a major disease burden among Tibetans.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants of the local Tibetans, and local medical care professionals for their valuable contributions.

Data Availability

All relevant data are available within the paper.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the government of Changdu, Tibet and Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009; 119:480–486. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2003—Shaping the Future. Revised edition Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997; 349:1269–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The Global Burden of Disease: a Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability From Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. 1st ed Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. The Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook 2011. Beijing: China Union Medical University Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wang J, Ning X, Yang L, Lu H, Tu J, Jin W, et al. Trends of hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in rural areas of northern China during 1991–2011. J Hum Hypertens. 2014; 28:25–31. 10.1038/jhh.2013.44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Reynolds K, Gu D, Whelton PK, Wu X, Duan X, Mo J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of overweight and obesity in China. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15: 10–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. He J, Gu D, Reynolds K, Wu X, Muntner P, Zhao J, et al. Serum total and lipoprotein cholesterol levels and awareness, treatment, and control of hypercholesterolemia in China. Circulation. 2004; 110: 405–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yu Z, Nissinen A, Vartiainen E, Song G, Guo Z, Zheng G, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors in an urban population in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78:1296–1305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1090–1101. 10.1056/NEJMoa0908292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liu L, Ikeda K, Chen M, Yin Wei, Mizushima Shunsaku, Miki Tomohiro, et al. Obesity, emerging risk in China: trend of increasing prevalence of obesity and its association with hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia among the Chinese. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004; 31:S8–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sherpa LY, Deji, Stigum H, Chongsuvivatwong V, Nafstad P, Bjertness E. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Common Metabolic Components in High Altitude Farmers and Herdsmen at 3700m in Tibet. High Alt Med Biol. 2013; 14:37–44. 10.1089/ham.2012.1051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zheng Xi, Yao Dao-Kuo, Zhuo-Ma Ci-Ren, Tang Jie, Wang Tao-Ran, Hong-Hai Zhang, et al. Prevalence, Self-Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in Lhasa, Tibet. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. 2012; 34: 328–333. 10.3109/10641963.2011.649930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Xingshan Zhao, Shenshen Li, Sang Ba, Feng He, Nicole Li, Ke Liang, et al. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among Herdsmen Living at 4,300 m in Tibet. American journal of hypertension. 2012;25:583–589. 10.1038/ajh.2012.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tripathy Vikal, Gupta Ranjan. Blood pressure variation among Tibetans at different altitudes. Annals of Human Biology. 2007; 34: 470–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, Frohlich ED, Hill M, McDonald M, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation. 1993; 88:2460–2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo Joseph L, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of high blood pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003; 289:2560–2572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Disease control, Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. The guidelines of Chinese adult overweight and obesity prevention and control. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CS, Richmond W, Fu PC. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974; 20:470–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. The joint committee of Chinese adult dyslipidemia prevention guide establishing [in Chinese]. The guidelines of Chinese adult dyslipidemia prevention and control. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Disease. 2007; 35: 390–419. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chinese Diabetes Society. China Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes. Beijing: Beijing University Medical Publication House; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ahmad OB PC B, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age standardization of rates: A new who world standard GPE Discussion Paper Series, No 31. Geneva, EIP/GPE/EBD, WHO; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gu Dongfeng, Gupta Anjali, Muntner Paul, Hu Shengshou, Duan Xiufang, Chen J, et al. Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Clustering Among the Adult Population of China Results From the International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia (InterAsia). Circulation. 2005; 112: 658–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhang Lei, Qin Li-Qiang, Cui Hong-Yue, Liu Ai-Ping, Wang Pei-Yu. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors clustering among suburban residents in Beijing, China. International Journal of Cardiology. 2011; 151: 46–49. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. He Liu, Tang Xun, Song Yan, Li Na, Li Jingrong, Zhang Z, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in a rural district of Beijing, China: a population-based survey of 58,308 residents. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:34–43. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Huang J, Zhang W, Li X, Zhou J, Gao Y, Cai Y, et al. Analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of hypertension in the She population in Fujian, China. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2011; 34:69–74. 10.1159/000323164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li H, Meng Q, Sun X, Salter A, Briggs NE, Hiller JE. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural China: results from Shandong Province. J Hypertens. 2010; 28:432–438. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328334b39e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Penaloza D, Arias-Stella J. The heart and pulmonary circulation at high altitudes: healthy highlanders and chronic mountain sickness. Circulation. 2007; 115:1132–1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Strand A, Gudmundsdottir H, Hoieggen A, Fossum E, Bjørnerheim R, Os I, et al. Increased hematocrit before blood pressure in men who develop hypertension over 20 years. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2007; 1:400–406. 10.1016/j.jash.2007.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ploubidis GB, Mathenge W, De Stavola B, Fossum Eigil, Bjørnerheim Reidar, Kuper H. Socioeconomic position and later life prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and visual impairment in Nakuru, Kenya. Int J Public Health. 2013;58:133–141. 10.1007/s00038-012-0389-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sims M, Diez Roux AV, Boykin S, Sarpong D, Gebreab SY, Wyatt SB, et al. The socioeconomic gradient of diabetes prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2011; 21:892–898. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Insaf TZ, Strogatz DS, Yucel RM, Chasan-Taber L, Shaw BA. Associations between race, lifecourse socioeconomic position and prevalence of diabetes among US women and men: results from a population-based panel study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014; 68: 318–325. 10.1136/jech-2013-202585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kavanagh A, Bentley RJ, Turrell G, Shaw J, Dunstan D, Subramanian SV. Socioeconomic position, gender, health behaviours and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71:1150–1160. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Erem C, Hacihasanoglu A, Deger O, Kocak M, Topbas M. Prevalence of dyslipidemia and associated risk factors among Turkish adults: Trabzon lipid study. Endocrine. 2008; 34:36–51. 10.1007/s12020-008-9100-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Safraj S, Anish Ts, Vijayakumar K, Kutty VR, Soman CR. Socioeconomic position and prevalence of self-reported diabetes in rural Kerala, India: results from the PROLIFE study. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012; 24:480–486. 10.1177/1010539510387822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wang Y, Mi J, Shan XY, Wang QJ, Ge KY. Is China facing an obesity epidemic and the consequences? The trends in obesity and chronic disease in China. Int J Obesity. 2007; 31:177–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Thomas GN, Schooling CM, McGhee SM, Ho SY, Cheung BM, Wat NM, et al. Metabolic syndrome increases all-cause and vascular mortality: the Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Study. Clin Endocrin. 2007; 66:666–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yusuf HR, Giles WH, Croft JB, Anda RF, Casper ML. Impact of multiple risk factor profiles on determining cardiovascular disease risk. Prev Med. 1998; 27:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are available within the paper.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES