Abstract
Objective:
To describe the characteristics and needs prior to, on admission, during the first month in hospital, at the thirtieth day of hospitalization and posthospital discharge of psychiatric patients occupying acute beds.
Methods:
This prospective observational study was conducted in 2 tertiary care hospitals. Adult patients hospitalized on a psychiatric unit for 30 days were identified. Data was collected from their medical charts and interviews with their health care team. The categorization of acute and nonacute status at day 30 was based on the health care professional’s evaluation. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed.
Results:
A total of 262 patients were identified (mean age 45 years), 66% lived at home and 11% were homeless. More than one-half were cognitively impaired and a few had special medical needs. Ninety-seven per cent had been admitted from the emergency department. At day 30, 81% of patients required acute care, while 19% (95% CI 15% to 24%) occupied an acute care bed, despite the resolution of their acute condition. The main reason preventing discharge of nonacute patients was the difficulty or inability to find appropriate resources that met patients’ needs. As for patients who required acute care, the most common psychiatric issues were delusions or hallucinations (34%), inability to take medications independently (23.6%), and inadequate control of aggression or impulsivity (16.5%).
Conclusions:
Prevention of the discharge of nonacute patients is largely due to the difficulty in finding appropriate resources that meet patients’ needs. Improved access to community and subacute care resources could potentially facilitate the hospital discharge of psychiatric nonacute patients.
Keywords: nonacute patients, acute care beds, occupancy, discharge delays, length of stay
Abstract
Objectif :
Décrire les caractéristiques et les besoins, avant l’hospitalisation, au moment de l’admission, durant le premier mois, au 30e jour d’hospitalisation et après le congé de l’hôpital de patients psychiatriques occupant des lits de soins actifs.
Méthode :
Cette étude d’observation prospective a été menée dans 2 hôpitaux de soins tertiaires. Les patients adultes hospitalisés dans une unité psychiatrique pendant 30 jours ont été identifiés. Les données ont été recueillies dans leurs dossiers médicaux et par des entrevues avec leur équipe de soins de santé. La catégorisation du statut aigu et non aigu au 30e jour se fondait sur l’évaluation des professionnels de la santé. Des analyses descriptives et univariées ont été exécutées.
Résultats :
Un total de 262 patients ont été identifiés (âge moyen 45 ans), dont 66 % vivaient à la maison et 11 % étaient sans abri. Plus de la moitié étaient cognitivement déficients et quelques-uns avaient des besoins médicaux spéciaux. Quatre-vingt dix-sept pour cent avaient été hospitalisés depuis le service d’urgence. Au 30e jour, 81 % des patients nécessitaient des soins actifs, tandis que 19 % (IC à 95 % 15 % à 24 %) occupaient un lit de soins actifs, malgré la résolution de leur état aigu. La principale raison empêchant le congé des patients non aigus était la difficulté ou l’incapacité de trouver des ressources appropriées répondant aux besoins des patients. Quant aux patients nécessitant des soins actifs, les problèmes psychiatriques les plus communs étaient les délires ou hallucinations (34 %), l’incapacité de prendre leurs médicaments de façon autonome (23,6 %), et le contrôle inadéquat de l’agressivité ou de l’impulsivité (16,5 %).
Conclusions :
L’empêchement du congé des patients non aigus est largement attribuable à la difficulté de trouver des ressources appropriées répondant aux besoins des patients. L’accès amélioré aux ressources communautaires et de soins subaigus pourrait éventuellement faciliter le congé de l’hôpital des patients psychiatriques non aigus.
It is recognized that outpatient resources for patients who suffer from psychiatric illnesses are insufficient.1–4 As a result, a significant number of psychiatric patients use EDs as their main entrance into the health care system5–8 and as a source of primary care.2,3,9–11 Due to their complex needs,2,9,12 a significant percentage of psychiatric patients presenting to the ED require inpatient care. This is reflected by their high admission rates (22% to 35%2,8,13–15; and up to 54% for patients with substance abuse).15 This high admission rate, combined with a lack of acute care beds on inpatient psychiatric units1–3,10,11 results in boarding of admitted patients in ED corridors.
It is accepted that acute care resources, including hospital beds, should be used by patients who need them the most.16 With limited acute care psychiatry beds to adequately meet the needs, it becomes imperative that patients not remain in hospital after their acute care episode resolves. However, due to the specific needs of this clientele, patients are not leaving the acute care psychiatry units in a timely manner.
Lack of housing and community support for patients requiring long-term care is commonly cited among the reasons that prevent hospital discharges and extend hospital stays on acute psychiatry units.17 As a result, an important proportion of acute psychiatry beds are occupied inappropriately because of the absence of suitable alternative settings.18 For example, Paton et al19 reported that up to 40% of elderly patients were inappropriately hospitalized on an acute psychiatry unit, primarily because no other alternatives were available. This is not a new problem; more than 15 years ago, the major reasons preventing hospital discharge from acute psychiatry wards included a lack of suitable alternatives, such as long-term rehabilitation beds or domiciliary based community support.20
Clinical Implications
It is not uncommon for admitted psychiatric patients to board in the ED for lengthy periods of time due to difficulties in accessing acute hospital psychiatric beds.
Psychiatry beds are limited and consequently, the demand for acute hospital care is not adequately addressed. Therefore, it is imperative to identify the reasons that prevent the discharge of nonacute patients.
The obstacle to discharging nonacute patients is largely the difficulty in finding appropriate resources that meet patient needs. Improved access to community and subacute care resources could potentially facilitate the hospital discharge of psychiatric nonacute patients.
Limitations
The categorization of acute and nonacute status was based on the subjective opinions of the health care professionals managing the patients as specified in the patients’ medical charts.
Our study does not address the needs of nonacute patients discharged prior to 30 days of hospitalization.
The small sample of patients categorized as nonacute in our study prevents us from identifying factors related to inappropriate use of acute care beds.
Previous studies17,21–24 have also shown that older age, cognitive impairment,23,24 functional dependence,23 as well as the presence of multiple comorbidities and physical illnesses25 were associated with longer hospital LOS for psychiatric patients. Additionally, diagnoses of schizophrenia,26,27 psychotic or mood disorders,21,22 and the presence of aggression or agitation26 are associated with longer hospital stays.
Our study’s objective was to describe psychiatric patients occupying acute beds in a psychiatric unit and based on their needs, to determine the level of care required (acute, compared with nonacute) at day 30 of hospitalization. Specific objectives included describing patients’ characteristics and needs during the following times: prior to hospitalization, on admission, during the first month in hospital, at the thirtieth day of hospitalization, and posthospital discharge.
Methods
Study Design and Settings
Our prospective observational study was conducted in 2 university tertiary care hospitals in Montreal from March 2009 to April 2010. The JGH has 637 hospital beds, of which 48 are psychiatry beds, while NDH has 403 inpatient beds, of which 56 are psychiatry beds. In 2009–2010, admissions to a psychiatry unit in both hospitals represented 2.9% and 6.7% of their total hospitalizations, respectively. Our study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of both hospitals. Since the study did not involve patient contact, no written informed consent was required.
Participants
Adult patients (18 years or older) admitted to the psychiatry unit were identified on the thirtieth day (plus or minus 3 days) of their hospitalization. Patients with psychiatric problems not admitted to the psychiatry unit were excluded. Day 30 was selected first because it closely represents the average hospital LOS on psychiatric units at both hospitals (2009–2010 = 29.6 days). Second, according to the latest Quebec provincial data, patients admitted to an acute psychiatry unit in Montreal stayed in hospital on average 31.5 days.28
Data Collection
Data were collected from chart reviews and additional information was obtained when needed from the appropriate health care professionals. Five categories of data were collected: pre-admission (for example, sociodemographics, living arrangements, psychosocial condition, and special medical needs), on admission (for example, type of admission and admission diagnosis), from admission to day 30 (for example, consultations, evaluations, and treatments), on day 30 (for example, current diagnosis, active psychiatric problems, discharge status, reasons to stay, and level of care needed), and postdischarge (for example, hospital LOS and destination). Diagnoses on admission and at day 30 were classified according to the ICD-10-CA.29
Analysis
Descriptive statistics including means (standard deviations), medians, proportions, and 95% confidence intervals were used to describe various characteristics. Exploratory univariate analyses, including the chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test compared different factors between the acute and nonacute groups at day 30. The categorization of acute and nonacute status was based on the health care professionals’ evaluations, as specified in the patients’ medical charts. Additional exploratory analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with appropriateness of stay (acute, compared with nonacute) at day 30 of hospitalization. For example, we sought to determine whether living alone or not having family support was associated with inappropriate stay on an acute care unit. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) statistical analysis software.
Results
Pre-Admission
In total, 349 patients were admitted to a psychiatry unit, among which 262 (75%) were identified for the study. More than one-half were male, with a mean age of 45 years (17%; ≥65 years). Twenty-six per cent reported a language other than English or French as their mother tongue, and 7 patients (3%) spoke neither English nor French. Most patients (66.4%) lived at home, 22% lived in a specialized residence or group home, and 11% were homeless. Family was available when needed for 36% of patients, and very few (mainly older patients) were receiving home care from community health services. Fifty-seven per cent were cognitively impaired, of which 81% had a legal representative. Finally, a few patients had special medical needs, such as hearing or visual impairments, nutritional needs, or required a wheelchair (Table 1).
Table 1.
Patient characteristics and situation before the hospital admission
| Characteristic | Total n = 262 | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| n | % | |
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 45 (18.0) | |
| Male | 149 | 56.9 |
| Age group, years | ||
| 18–34 | 93 | 35.5 |
| 35–49 | 68 | 26.0 |
| 50–64 | 58 | 22.1 |
| ≥65 | 44 | 16.8 |
| Mother tongue other than English or French | 68 | 26.0 |
| Living arrangements | ||
| Home with other adults | 93 | 35.5 |
| Home alone | 81 | 30.9 |
| Residence or group home | 57 | 21.8 |
| Homeless | 28 | 10.7 |
| Jail | 3 | 1.1 |
| Help—family available when needed | 94 | 35.9 |
| Home care | 11 | 4.2 |
| Cognitively impaired | 148 | 56.5 |
| Special medical needs | ||
| Hearing impairment | 7 | 2.7 |
| Vision impairment | 4 | 1.5 |
| Nutritional needs (for example, tube feeding) | 3 | 1.1 |
| Wheelchair | 2 | 0.8 |
On Admission
As shown in Table 2, patients were mainly admitted from the ED. Twenty-seven per cent had only 1 admission diagnosis, 38% had 2 and 35% had 3 or more (maximum of 7). As expected, most patients (99%) had a diagnosis within the category of mental and behavioural disorders (ICD-10-CA; Chapter V).29 In fact, only 4 patients were admitted to a psychiatry unit without an admission diagnosis in the above category. Two patients had a diagnosis in the category factors influencing health status and contact with health services. One patient waiting for a court date was admitted for examination and encounter for administrative purposes, and 1 homeless patient was admitted because of a personal history of risk factors. One patient with a psychotic disorder was admitted for endocrine disorders, and 1 elderly patient with schizophrenia was admitted after a fall. Both were admitted under psychiatry due to a history of mental disorders, and followed by consultants from endocrinology and orthopedics, respectively.
Table 2.
Admission characteristics
| Characteristic | Total n = 262 | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| n | % | |
| Type of admission | ||
| From the emergency department | 253 | 96.6 |
| Transfer from another hospital | 4 | 1.5 |
| Direct admission from home | 3 | 1.1 |
| Transfer from jail | 2 | 0.8 |
| Number of admission diagnoses | ||
| Only 1 diagnosis | 71 | 27.1 |
| 2 diagnoses | 100 | 38.2 |
| ≥3 diagnoses (maximum of 7) | 91 | 34.7 |
| Category of admission diagnosisa | ||
| Chapter V: Mental and behavioural disorders | 258 | 98.5 |
| F20: Schizophrenia | 101 | 38.5 |
| F29: Unspecified nonorganic psychosis | 70 | 26.7 |
| F25: Schizoaffective disorders | 61 | 23.3 |
| F31: Bipolar affective disorder | 55 | 21.0 |
| F32: Depressive episode | 42 | 16.0 |
| F60: Specific personality disorders | 29 | 11.1 |
| Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with health services | 91 | 34.7 |
| Z91: Personal history of risk factors | 52 | 19.8 |
| Z65: Problems related to other psychosocial circumstances | 32 | 12.2 |
| Z86: Personal history of certain other diseases | 13 | 5.0 |
| Chapter VI: Diseases of the nervous system | 4 | 1.5 |
| Chapter IV: Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases | 3 | 1.1 |
| Chapter XX: External causes of morbidity and mortality | 3 | 1.1 |
| Chapter XIV: Diseases of the genitourinary system | 2 | 0.7 |
| Other (Chapters I, II, III, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIX) | 6 | 2.3 |
Not mutually exclusive
From Admission to Day 30
Seventy-nine consultations (excluding psychiatry) were requested from admission to day 30. In addition to psychiatry consultations, 11% of patients had 1 additional consultation, 4% had 2, 3% had 3, and 1 patient had 4. The 2 most frequent services consulted were internal medicine and endocrinology (Table 3). The most frequent evaluations and treatments were from social services and occupational therapy, respectively. Lastly, 3 patients required infection control isolation and 1 patient spent 3 days in the intensive care unit following a suicide attempt.
Table 3.
Consultations, evaluations, and treatments during the hospital stay
| Characteristic | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Types of consultationsa | 79 | |
| Internal medicine | 24 | 30.4 |
| Endocrinology | 16 | 20.3 |
| Dermatology | 7 | 8.9 |
| Neurology | 6 | 7.6 |
| Gastroenterology | 5 | 6.3 |
| Other medical specialty (cardiology, ENT, geriatrics, intensive care unit, infectious diseases, nephrology, orthopedics, pulmonary, surgery, urology) | 21 | 26.6 |
| Types of evaluationsa | 262 | |
| Social services | 176 | 67.2 |
| Nutrition | 21 | 8.0 |
| Speech therapy | 1 | 0.4 |
| Thrombosis team | 1 | 0.4 |
| Types of treatmentsa | 262 | |
| Occupational therapy | 137 | 52.3 |
| Spiritual support group | 21 | 8.0 |
| Psychotherapy | 19 | 7.3 |
| Physiotherapy | 17 | 6.5 |
| Electroconvulsive therapy | 17 | 6.5 |
| Dentistry | 7 | 2.7 |
| Audiology | 3 | 1.1 |
| Radiotherapy | 2 | 0.8 |
| Wound care | 1 | 0.4 |
Not mutually exclusive
ENT = ear, nose, and throat
On Day 30
Based on chart information, 212 patients (81%) still required acute care at day 30 of their hospitalization: 202 patients needed acute psychiatric care, 2 required acute medical care, and 8 patients needed both psychiatric and medical care. Fifty patients (19%; 95% CI 15% to 24%) required nonacute care at day 30: 40 patients were suitable for alternative resources (for example, outpatient follow-up or long-term care) while 10 patients did not require any type of care but remained in hospital for administrative purposes (for example, waiting for a court date or waiting for transfer to jail).
In the group of acute patients at day 30 of their hospitalization (Table 4), 40% were diagnosed with 1 condition requiring acute care, 36% with 2, 21% with 3, and 3% with 4 or more (maximum of 7). Diagnoses were mainly in the category of mental and behavioural disorders. Delusions, hallucinations, inability to take medications independently, and inadequate control of aggression and impulses were the most frequent psychiatric problems present at day 30.
Table 4.
Diagnosis and active psychiatric problems among acute care patients at day 30
| Characteristic | Total n = 212 | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| n | % | |
| Number of diagnoses at day 30 | ||
| Only 1 diagnosis | 85 | 40.1 |
| 2 diagnoses | 77 | 36.3 |
| ≥3 diagnoses (maximum of 7) | 50 | 23.6 |
| Category of diagnosis at day 30a | ||
| Chapter V: Mental and behavioural disorders | 210 | 99.1 |
| F20: Schizophrenia | 67 | 31.6 |
| F25: Schizoaffective disorders | 52 | 24.5 |
| F29: Unspecified nonorganic psychosis | 49 | 23.1 |
| F31: Bipolar affective disorder | 42 | 19.8 |
| F32: Depressive episode | 34 | 16.0 |
| F60: Specific personality disorders | 19 | 9.0 |
| Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with health services | 22 | 10.4 |
| Z91: Personal history of risk factors | 8 | 3.8 |
| Z65: Problems related to other psychosocial circumstances | 5 | 2.4 |
| Chapter XX: External causes of morbidity and mortality | 17 | 8.0 |
| Y84: Other medical procedures as the cause of abnormal reaction of the patient, or later complication, without mention of misadventure at the time of the procedure | 17 | 8.0 |
| Chapter IV: Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases | 12 | 5.7 |
| Chapter VI: Diseases of the nervous system | 6 | 2.8 |
| Chapter XI: Diseases of the digestive system | 6 | 2.8 |
| Chapter IX: Diseases of the circulatory system | 5 | 2.4 |
| Chapter XIV: Diseases of the genitourinary system | 3 | 1.4 |
| Other (Chapters II, III, X, XII, XIII, XIX) | 10 | 4.7 |
| Active psychiatric problems at day 30a | ||
| Delusions and hallucinations significantly interfere with functioning | 72 | 34.0 |
| Inability to take medication independent of hospital or medical staff | 50 | 23.6 |
| Inadequate control over aggression and impulsivity | 35 | 16.5 |
| Inability to carry out basic activities of daily living | 10 | 4.7 |
| Actively suicidal or homicidal | 9 | 4.2 |
Not mutually exclusive
In the group of patients who did not require acute care (Table 5), 38% were diagnosed with 1 condition, 44% with 2, and 18% with 3 or more (maximum of 6). Most patients had a diagnosis in the category of mental and behavioural disorders, followed by factors influencing health status and contact with health services. Among the reasons preventing hospital discharge, difficulty finding or lack of available resources were the most frequent (for example, waiting for ambulatory care, rehabilitation, or long-term care placement). Other reasons included administrative and (or) social issues (for example, waiting for a court date or waiting transfer to jail) and ongoing assessment to determine the appropriate resources.
Table 5.
Diagnosis and reasons to stay in hospital among nonacute care patients at day 30
| Characteristic | Total n = 50 | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| n | % | |
| Number of diagnoses at day 30 | ||
| Only 1 diagnosis | 19 | 38.0 |
| 2 diagnoses | 22 | 44.0 |
| ≥3 diagnoses (maximum of 6) | 9 | 18.0 |
| Category of diagnosis at day 30a | ||
| Chapter V: Mental and behavioural disorders | 46 | 92.0 |
| F20: Schizophrenia | 21 | 42.0 |
| F25: Schizoaffective disorders | 12 | 24.0 |
| F31: Bipolar affective disorder | 8 | 16.0 |
| F29: Unspecified nonorganic psychosis | 6 | 12.0 |
| F32: Depressive episode | 4 | 8.0 |
| Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with health services | 25 | 50.0 |
| Z75: Problems related to medical facilities and other health care | 12 | 24.0 |
| Z02: Examination and encounter for administrative purposes | 8 | 16.0 |
| Other (Chapters VI, XIII, XIV, XX) | 5 | 10.0 |
| Reasons for no discharge at day 30 | ||
| Appropriate resources lacking or difficult to find | 33 | 66.0 |
| Administrative or social issues | 15 | 30.0 |
| No longer acute but ongoing assessment to determine appropriate resources | 14 | 28.0 |
| Ongoing liaison process with community care staff | 6 | 12.0 |
| Ongoing family discussion | 4 | 8.0 |
| Waiting for a specific treatment | 3 | 6.0 |
Not mutually exclusive
Postdischarge
At the end of our study (June 2011), hospital LOS and discharge destination information was obtained for all patients. Almost all patients living at home (173/175; median LOS = 45 days/maximum of 298 days) or in a group home or specialized residence (55/56; median LOS = 54 days/maximum of 318 days) returned to their original residences. One patient living at home was transferred to another acute care hospital after 129 days, while another patient previously living in a group home was relocated to a long-term care institution for nonautonomous patients after 92 days. As for homeless patients, they were all relocated (27/28; median LOS = 53 days/maximum of 167 days) except for 1 patient who left the hospital against medical advice after 108 days. For patients incarcerated at the time of admission, 1 was transferred back to jail after 161 days and 2 patients were released by the court and returned home: 1 after 84 days, the other after 507 days. Finally, 1 patient living at home who was admitted to the hospital on June 1, 2009 was still hospitalized, 2 years later.
Exploratory Analyses
Univariate analyses did not reveal significant factors associated with nonacute status (most likely due to the small sample of nonacute patients [n = 50]). However, although not statistically significant, the proportion of nonacute patients was higher for those with fewer admitting diagnoses (≤2 = 23%, compared with >3 = 13%) and lack of family support (no support = 23%, compared with support = 13%).
Discussion
Our study describes psychiatric patients occupying acute care beds in psychiatric units and based on their needs, determines the level of care required (acute, compared with nonacute) at day 30 of their hospitalization.
At day 30 of hospitalization, 19% of patients occupied an acute care bed, despite being nonacute. This is consistent with other studies confirming the use of acute care beds for nonacute needs.19,20 Various reasons preventing these patients from leaving the hospital were identified. The most frequent was the lack of, or difficulties in finding, appropriate resources that best met the patients’ needs. In fact, previous work has shown that the demand for alternative services (for example, long-term care, community support, or rehabilitation) often exceeds the available resources.1,17,30,31 The complexity of patients’ medical needs increases the difficulty in finding appropriate resources in a timely manner.
As a result, rehousing or permanent placement of patients with multiple comorbidities (for example, mental retardation, schizophrenic patients with violent behaviour, or patients with physical limitations or handicaps suffering from psychiatric disease) is associated with long discharge delays.32,33 In such cases, collaboration between all relevant in- and outpatient services is crucial in facilitating the discharge process.34
As well, access to subacute facilities that provide a level of care appropriate for specific clienteles (for example, elderly patients with psychiatric illnesses) could be difficult.35 Studies have shown that subacute facilities, such as nursing homes, are rarely equipped or staffed to provide appropriate services to patients with psychiatric conditions.36,37 Further, the number of other placement options capable of providing optimal care (that is, rehabilitation, home care, and [or] community services) is insufficient to adequately respond to the demand.1,17,30,31 This, in part, explains why psychiatric patients remain in hospital longer, compared with nonpsychiatric patients.30 Moreover, discharge options are sometimes limited for patients with multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities, who have complex needs. As a result, this patient population is at greater risk for occupying an acute care bed, even after the acute episode has been managed.19,30 Paton et al19 found that an acute psychiatric care ward was not an appropriate setting for up to 40% of elderly patients hospitalized on that unit. For optimal resource use, as well as to address patients’ needs in the best possible manner, all alternatives to acute psychiatric care units, including community support and (or) residential care, should be considered.38
Our study also demonstrated that over 80% of patients continued to require acute psychiatric care at day 30 of their hospitalization, while only 5% required both psychiatric and medical acute care. Availability and awareness of alternative resources for patients with acute psychiatric needs would also allow for the identification of patients potentially suitable for these resources. Previous research has shown that alternative resources could be beneficial for patients who require hospital level acute psychiatric care,39–41 without medical care.42 For example, in our study, 24% of patients were unable to take their medication independently and 5% were unable to carry out basic activities of daily living. As these types of care could be provided in subacute settings, such as residences or nursing homes, access to such resources would potentially facilitate discharging these patients. Lastly, although some alternative resources can be provided to patients with acute psychiatric care needs, those with serious problems, such as active suicidal or homicidal behaviour would be more appropriate for hospital-based programs.43,44
Improved access and use of alternatives to acute psychiatric beds for patients suitable for subacute facilities would also benefit EDs. Psychiatric patients represent a major challenge for EDs,1 mainly because of their increased volume,2,8,45,46 long ED LOS,2,11,47,48 and high admission rates.8,10 In our study, 97% of our patient population was admitted from the ED, with an average LOS of 37 and 76 hours for the JGH and NDH, respectively. Increasing access to inpatient beds would undoubtedly reduce the burden on EDs1 by reducing the boarding times of admitted patients. Similarly, quality of care would be improved as patients would be managed by specialized psychiatric personnel instead of ED staff, who are not adequately trained to deal effectively with the specific needs of this clientele.1,3,49
More than one-half of our patients were cognitively impaired; a frequent occurrence among patients with mental disorders.50 This characteristic has been found to be associated with longer hospitalization.51,52 Cognitively impaired patients remaining on an acute psychiatric care unit present a major concern, mainly because these settings are often unable to adequately meet these patients’ needs.53,54
Finally, 8 patients in the nonacute group had a total hospital LOS of greater than 100 days, with 1 patient staying as long as 153 days. For the longest hospitalizations, a thorough chart review revealed 2 main reasons explaining the prolonged stays. First, the appropriate resources were very difficult to find for patients with multiple medical and psychiatric needs (for example, elderly handicapped patients suffering from schizophrenia, suicidal patients with drug addiction, or homeless patients with psychosis and with criminal records). This result corresponds with other studies18–20,35 that have reported limited access to alternative resources for patients with multiple problems. Second, in the case of patients admitted under a court decision (for example, examination and encounter for administrative purposes or direct transfer from jail), delays were incurred due to provincial judicial administrative backlogs55,56 out of the control of the hospitals.
Our study has some limitations. First, the designation of acute, compared with nonacute, status was subjectively determined based on the medical team’s opinions. Second, our study’s time frame did not allow for the identification of factors related to inappropriate use of acute care beds (mainly due to the small sample; n = 50 nonacute patients). Further, given that day 30 was the point of interest selected in our study, there is the possibility that nonacute patients discharged prior could have exhibited unique characteristics that were not captured in our study. Lastly, applicability of our findings to other health care environments may be limited because of differences in how health care systems are organized and funded outside Canada.
Nevertheless, our study provides relevant data that will be useful in designing future research. For example, for studies designed to identify risk factors for nonacute prolonged hospital stays or those related to examining the financial impact of nonacute hospital stays, compared with other alternative settings.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that over 80% of patients continued to require acute psychiatric care at day 30 of their hospitalization, while 19% occupied an acute care bed despite their acute episode having been resolved. Delusions, hallucinations, inability to take medications independently, and inadequate control over aggression and impulses were the most common reasons requiring acute psychiatric care at day 30. A certain number of patients currently designated acute care may benefit from alternative resources to being hospitalized on an acute care psychiatric unit.
The results of our study highlight the challenges and the unrealistic expectations faced by psychiatric acute care units. For example, resources destined for the aging population are often inadequate for psychiatric patients and it is not unusual that long-term care facilities refuse to accept patients with psychiatric disorders (for example, elderly patients suffering from schizophrenia are very difficult to place when their condition prevents them from being discharged home).
When these patients cannot be discharged to alternative settings for whatever reason (resource unavailable, administrative, or social issues), acute care units become the holding area. These challenges need to be proactively addressed, potentially through the development of policies, interventions, and research focused on coordination of specialized services with primary care and improved intersectorial collaborations in the organization of mental health service.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported in part by the Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec, grant number 13795. The authorship of the manuscript do not have conflicts of interest to report.
Abbreviations
- ED
emergency department
- ICD
International Classification of Diseases
- JGH
Jewish General Hospital
- LOS
length of stay
- NDH
Notre-Dame Hospital
References
- 1.Zun LS. Pitfalls in the care of the psychiatric patient in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(5):829–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nicks BA, Manthey DM. The impact of psychiatric patient boarding in the emergency departments. Emergency medicine international print volume 2012-article ID 360308 [Internet] New York (NY): Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2012. [cited 2013 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/emi/2012/360308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tuttle GAL. Report of the Council on Medical Service—access to psychiatric beds and impact on emergency medicine / CMS Report 2-A-08 [Internet] Chicago (IL): American Medical Association; 2008. [cited 2013 April 15]. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/cms/a-08cms2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baraff LJ, Janovicz N, Asarnow JR. Survey of California emergency departments about practices for management of suicidal patients and resources available for their care. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(4):452–459. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal . Patients surcivière et ambulatoires dans les hôpitaux de Montréal [Internet] Montréal (QC): Gouvernement du Québec; 2012. [cited 2012 July 23]. Available from: http://www.cmisstats.mtl.rtss.qc.ca/tabloclip/index.php?resource_s=com.utilisation_services.urgence.patciv.urgence. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shafiei T, Gaynor N, Farrell G. The characteristics, management and outcomes of people identified with mental health issues in an emergency department, Melbourne, Australia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011;18(1):9–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sood TR, Mcstay CM. Evaluation of the psychiatric patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009;27(4):669–683. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hazlett SB, McCarthy ML, Londner MS, et al. Epidemiology of adult psychiatric visits to US emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(2):193–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sinclair L, Hunter R, Hagen S, et al. How effective are mental health nurses in A&E departments? Emerg Med J. 2006;23(9):687–692. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.033175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kalucy R, Thomas L, King D. Changing demand for mental health services in the emergency department of a public hospital. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(1):74–80. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alakeson V, Pande N, Ludwig M. A plan to reduce emergency room “boarding” of psychiatric patients. Health Affairs. 2010;29(9):1637–1642. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mirin S, Summergrad P. The evolving academic health center: challenges and opportunities for psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35(2):89–95. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.35.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lambert MT, LePage JP, Schmitt AL. Five-year outcomes following psychiatric consultation to a tertiary care emergency room. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(7):1350–1353. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kunen S, Prejean C, Gladney B, et al. Disposition of emergency department patients with psychiatric comorbidity: results from the 2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(4):274–275. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.027367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Claassen CA, Gilfillan S, Orsulak P, et al. Substance use among patients with a psychotic disorder in the psychiatric emergency room. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(3):353–358. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.3.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Canadian Association of Emergency Physician (CAEP) National Emergency Nurses Affiliation . Emergency department overcrowding—position statement, 2003 [Internet] Ottawa (ON): CAEP; 2003. [cited 2013 May3]. Available from: http://caep.ca/resources/position-statements-and-guidelines/ed-overcrowding-2003. [Google Scholar]
- 17.McDonagh MS, Smith DH, Goddard M. Measuring appropriate use of acute beds: asystematic review of methods and results. Health Policy. 2000;53(3):157–184. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00092-0. Erratum: Health Policy. 2000;54(2):163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rowlands P. New long-stay patients on acute psychiatric units: does audit change practice? Brit J Clin Pract. 1997;51(3):154–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paton JM, Fahy MA, Livingston GA. Delayed discharge—a solvable problem? The place of intermediate care in mental health care of older people. Aging Ment Health. 2004;8(1):34–39. doi: 10.1080/13607860310001613310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beadsmoore A, Hardy P, Moore C, et al. Relation between bed use, social deprivation and overall bed availability in acute adult psychiatric units, and alternative residential options: a cross sectional survey, on day census data, and staff interviews. Br Med J. 1997;314(7076):262–266. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7076.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McLay RN, Daylo A, Hammer PS. Predictors of length of stay in a psychiatric ward service serving active duty military and civilian patient. Mil Med. 2005;170(3):219–222. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jimenez RE, Lam RM, Marot M, et al. Observed-predicted length of stay for acute psychiatric department, as an indicator of inpatient care inefficiencies—retrospective case-series study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):4–13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jayaram G, Tien A, Sullivan P, et al. Elements of a successful short-stay inpatient psychiatric service. Psychiatr Serv. 1996;47(4):407–412. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.4.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Blais MA, Matthews J, Lipkis-Orlando R, et al. Predicting length of stay on an acute care medical psychiatric inpatient service. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2003;31(1):15–29. doi: 10.1023/a:1026044106172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sloan DM, Yokley J, Gottesman H, et al. A five-year study of the interactive effects of depression and physical illness on psychiatric unit length of stay. Psychosom Med. 1999;61(1):21–25. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199901000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Peiro S, Gomer G, Navarro M, et al. Length of stay and antipsychotic treatment costs of patients with acute psychosis admitted to hospital in Spain: description and associated factors—The Psychops Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(7):507–513. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0776-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huntly D, Cho D, Christman J, et al. Predicting length of stay in an acute psychiatric hospital. Psychiatr Serv. 1998;49(8):1049–1053. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.8.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Hospital mental health services in Canada, 2009–2010 [Internet] Ottawa (ON): CIHI; 2012. [cited 2014 Jun 16]. Available from: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Mental%20Health%20Annual%20Report%202009-2010%20FY_2012_EN-web.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Ottawa (ON): CIHI; 2009. 10th revision Canada. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nath SB, Marcus SC. Impact of psychotic disorders on discharge dispositions of adults or older after a general medical inpatient stay. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(4):333–337. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.O’Hara A. Housing for people with mental illness: update of a report to the President’s New Freedom Commission. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(7):907–913. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.7.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cowan C, Walker P. New long-stay patients in a psychiatric admission ward setting. Psychiatr Bull. 2005;29:452–454. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saeed H, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Stuart H, et al. Length of stay for psychiatric inpatient services: a comparison of admissions of people with and without developmental disabilities. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003;30(4):406–417. doi: 10.1007/BF02287428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shumway M, Alvidrez J, Leary M, et al. Impact of capacity reductions in acute public-sector inpatient psychiatric services. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(2):135–141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201000145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bartels SJ. Caring for the whole person: integrated health care for older adults with severe mental illness and medical comorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(Suppl 12):S249–S257. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aschbrenner K, Gravowski DC, Cai S, et al. Nursing home admissions and long-stay conversions among persons with and without serious mental illness. J Aging Soc Policy. 2011;23(3):286–304. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2011.579511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shea DG, Streit A, Smyer MA. Determinants of the use of specialist mental health services by nursing home residents. Health Serv Res. 1994;29(2):169–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Beck A, Croudace TJ, Singh S, et al. The Nottingham acute bed study: alternatives to acute psychiatric care. Br J Psychiatry. 1997;170(3):247–252. doi: 10.1192/bjp.170.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hawthorne WB, Green EE, Gilmer T, et al. A randomized trial of short-term acute residential treatment for veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(11):1379–1386. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.11.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hawthorne WB, Green EE, Lohr JB, et al. Comparison of outcomes of acute care in short-term residential treatment and psychiatric hospital settings. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50(3):401–406. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.3.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hawthorne WB, Green EE, Folsom D, et al. A randomized study comparing the treatment environment in alternative and hospital-based acute psychiatric care. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(9):1239–1244. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.9.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fenton WS, Mosher LR, Herrell JM, et al. Randomized trial of general hospital and residential alternative care for patients with severe and persistent mental illness. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155(4):516–522. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.4.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ries RK, Yuodelis-Flores C, Roy-Byrne PP, et al. Addiction and suicidal behavior in acute psychiatric inpatients. Compr Psychiatry. 2009;50(2):93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sullivan AM, Barron CT, Bezmen J, et al. The safe treatment of the suicidal patient in an adult inpatient setting: a proactive preventive approach. Psychiatr Q. 2005;76(1):67–83. doi: 10.1007/s11089-005-5582-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Larkin GL, Claassen CA, Emond JA, et al. Trends in U.S. emergency department visits for mental health conditions, 1992 to 2001. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(6):671–677. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.6.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Weiss AP, Chang G, Rauch SL, et al. Patient- and practice-related determinants of emergency department length of stay for patients with psychiatric illness. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(2):162–171.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Little DR, Clasen ME, Hendricks JL, et al. Impact of closure of mental health center: emergency department utilization and length of stay among patients with severe mental illness. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011;22(2):469–472. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Slade ED, Dixon LB, Semmel S. Trends in the duration of emergency department visits, 2001–2006. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(9):878–884. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.9.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Clarke DE, Dusome D, Hughes L. Emergency department from the mental health client’s perspective. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007;16(2):126–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2007.00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schretlen D, Jayaram G, Maki P, et al. Demographic, clinical, and neurocognitive correlates of everyday functional impairment in severe mental illness. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109(1):134–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lorén Guerrero L, GascónCatalán M. Biopsychosocial factors related to length of hospital stay in older people. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011;19(6):1377–1384. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692011000600014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kozyrskyi A, De Coster C, St John P. Long stay patients in Winnipeg acute care hospitals. Healthc Manage Forum. 2002;15(Suppl4):15–20. doi: 10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60177-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nilsson A, Rasmussen BH, Edvardsson D. Falling behind: a substantive theory of care for older people with cognitive impairment in acute settings. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(11–12):1682–1691. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Edvardsson D, Nilsson A, Fetherstonhaugh D, et al. The person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care scale (POPAC) J Nurs Manag. 2013;21(1):79–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tribunal administratif du Québec . Rapport annuel de gestion 2009–2010 [Internet] Québec (QC): Gouvernement du Québec; 2010. [cited 2013 May 24]. Available from: http://www.taq.gouv.qc.ca/documents/file/Rapport_annuel_2009-2010.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Millaud F. Malades mentaux criminels : la prise en charge judiciaire au Québec. In: de Beaurepaire C, Bénézech M, Kottler C, editors. Les dangerosités: de la criminologie à la psychopathologie, entre justice et psychiatrie. Paris (FR): John Libbey Eurotext; 2004. [Google Scholar]
