Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2015 May 13;71(Pt 6):621–623. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015008221

Crystal structure of (2-chloro­eth­yl)[2-(methyl­sulfan­yl)benz­yl]ammonium chloride

P Raghavendra Kumar a,*, Upereti Shailesh b, B S Palakshamurthy c
PMCID: PMC4459316  PMID: 26090135

In the cation of the title mol­ecular salt, the N atom is protonated with sp 3-hybridization and has a tetra­hedral geometry. In the crystal, the cations are bridged by the Cl anions via N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming four-centred inversion dimers with an Inline graphic(8) ring motif.

Keywords: crystal structure, chloro­eth­yl, S and N donors, amine hydro­chloride, N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds

Abstract

In the title mol­ecular salt, C10H15ClNS+·Cl, the cation is [RR"NH2]+, where R′ is 2-MeS-C6H4CH2– and R" is –CH2CH2Cl, and the anion is Cl. In the cation, the N atom is protonated with sp 3-hybridization and with a tetra­hedral geometry. In the crystal, the anions are connected to the cations through two pairs of N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, generating a four-centred inversion dimer with an R 4 2(8) ring motif.

Chemical context  

Chloro­ethyl-functionalized derivatives containing S- and N-donor sites are used for the preparation of (S, N, S/Se/Te/P/As/Sb)-type tridentate hybrid ligands by nucleophilic substitution of the chloro (Cl) group by RS, ArSe, ArTe, Ph2P, Ar2As (Kumar et al., 2008a ; Singh et al., 1999; Singh & Singh, 2010, 2012; Kumar et al., 2008b ). Metal complexes of this type of hybrid ligand are important and have found applications as catalysts in organic synthesis (Singh et al., 2013). Keeping this in mind, it was thought worthwhile to synthesise and characterise the title mol­ecular salt. We report herein on its synthesis, by chlorination of 2-(2-methyl­thio)­benzyl­amino)­ethanol using thionyl chloride, and on its crystal structure.graphic file with name e-71-00621-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

In the cation of the title mol­ecular salt (Fig. 1), the –CH2–N+H2–CH2–CH2–Cl substituent has an extended conformation with all of the non-H atoms lying in a plane [maximum deviation = 0.032 (4) Å for atom C8]. The N1 atom is protonated with sp 3-hybridization and has a tetra­hedral geometry. The S1 atom lies in the plane of the benzene ring to which it is attached while the methyl C10 atom is displaced from the plane of the benzene ring by 1.773 (5) Å.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title mol­ecular salt, showing the atom labelling. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

The title mol­ecular salt was also characterised by NMR and FT–IR spectroscopy. In the proton NMR spectrum, the signals for the NCH2 and CH2Cl protons gave two triplets at 3.25 and 3.9 p.p.m., respectively. The [C10H15ClSN]+ cation is a secondary ammonium ion in which the N atom is protonated and hence undergoes sp 3 hybridization, resulting in a tetra­hedral geometry around the N atom. This was confirmed by NMR as the 〉NH2 + protons are highly deshielded and are observed as a broad singlet at 10.03 p.p.m. In the FT–IR spectrum of title salt, the N–H stretching band was observed at 1569 cm−1.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, the cation and anion are connected through two pairs of N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds. These hydrogen bonds result in the formation of four-centred inversion dimers with an Inline graphic(8) ring motif (Table 1 and Fig. 2).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ).

DHA DH HA D A DHA
N1H1BCl2 0.89 2.21 3.090(3) 169
N1H1ACl2i 0.89 2.32 3.163(3) 158

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The crystal packing of the title mol­ecular salt, viewed along the a axis. The N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (see Table 1 for details).

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.36; Groom & Allen, 2014) found no hits for similar compounds. However, tridentate (S, N, S/Se/Te)-type ligands containing the cationic part of the title salt and their PdII and RuII complexes have been synthesised and structurally characterized (Kumar et al., 2008a ; Singh & Singh, 2012; Singh et al., 2012).

Synthesis and crystallization  

The synthesis of the title compound is illustrated in Fig. 3. 2-(2-Methyl­thio)­benzyl­amino)­ethanol (2 g, 10 mmol) was dissolved in 20 ml of dry chloro­form and the solution was cooled in an ice bath. Freshly distilled SOCl2 (3 ml, 40 mmol) dissolved in 20 ml of dry chloro­form was added to it dropwise over a period of 15 min. When the addition was complete, the temperature of the reaction mixture was increased slowly and the mixture was stirred under reflux for 6 h. Thereafter, the reaction mixture was cooled and concentrated to 10 ml on a rotary evaporator, giving a light-brown solid. The solid was dissolved in 10 ml of methanol, boiled with a pinch of activated charcoal and filtered. The filtrate was treated with 20 ml of diethyl ether. It gave a white crystalline product (caution: eye and skin irritant), which was filtered, washed with diethyl ether (10 ml × 4) and dried between the folds of filter paper. Colourless prisms of the title compound were grown in ethanol by slow evaporation of the solvent (yield: 70%; m.p.: 413 K; ΛM = 3.0 cm2 mol−1 ohm−1. Elemental analysis, found (calc.): C, 47.87 (47.68), H, 5.95 (5.99), N, 5.68 (5.55) %; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 298 K): δ (vs TMS): 2.55 (s, 3H, SCH3), 3.25 (t, J = 6.09 Hz, 2H, H1), 3.9 (t, J = 6,6 Hz, 2H, H2), 4.94 (s, 2H, H3), 7.26 (t, J = 6.96 Hz, 1H, H8), 7.34–7.46 (m, 2H, H6,7), 7.72–7.74 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, H9), 10.03 (bs, 2H, NH2 +). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 298 K): δ (vs TMS): 16.85 (SCH3), 48.17 (C2), 49.27 (C1), 57.12 (C3), 126.26 (C6), 127.89 (C7) , 128.87 (C4), 130.25 (C8), 131.50 (C9), 138.95 (C5). FT–IR (KBr, cm−1): 3415 (s), 1569 (b) (N–H), 1590 (C–N), 763 (C–S).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The synthesis of the title mol­ecular salt.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The hydrogen atoms attached to atom N1 were located in a difference Fourier map. In the final cycles of refinement they were included in calculated positions, as were the C-bound H atoms, and treated as riding atoms: N—H = 0.89 Å, C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.5U eq(C) for methyl H atoms and = 1.2U eq(N,C) for other H atoms.

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C10H15ClNS+Cl
M r 252.19
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 298
a, b, c () 6.5717(10), 11.8058(17), 16.201(2)
() 97.374(3)
V (3) 1246.5(3)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo K
(mm1) 0.65
Crystal size (mm) 0.28 0.24 0.20
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)
T min, T max 0.839, 0.881
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections 9002, 2255, 1584
R int 0.100
(sin /)max (1) 0.600
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.065, 0.158, 1.04
No. of reflections 2255
No. of parameters 128
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e 3) 0.50, 0.23

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, Global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008221/su5075sup1.cif

e-71-00621-sup1.cif (328.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008221/su5075Isup2.hkl

e-71-00621-Isup2.hkl (124.1KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008221/su5075Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 299500

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

PRK thanks Professor Ajai K. Singh of IIT Delhi, India, for his valuable guidance during his PhD studies. BSP thanks Dr H. C. Devarajegowda, Department of Physics, Yuvarajas College (constituent), University of Mysore, for his support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C10H15ClNS+·Cl F(000) = 528
Mr = 252.19 Dx = 1.344 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.5717 (10) Å θ = 2.1–25.0°
b = 11.8058 (17) Å µ = 0.65 mm1
c = 16.201 (2) Å T = 298 K
β = 97.374 (3)° Prism, colourless
V = 1246.5 (3) Å3 0.28 × 0.24 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1584 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.100
phi and ω scans θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013) h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.839, Tmax = 0.881 k = −14→14
9002 measured reflections l = −19→19
2255 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.158 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0727P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2255 reflections Δρmax = 0.50 e Å3
128 parameters Δρmin = −0.23 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.73384 (17) −0.10230 (10) 0.26820 (8) 0.0632 (4)
Cl1 0.2925 (2) 0.37387 (9) 0.02280 (9) 0.0769 (4)
N1 0.3518 (5) 0.0518 (2) 0.10476 (19) 0.0437 (8)
H1A 0.2751 0.0208 0.0613 0.052*
H1B 0.4827 0.0411 0.0980 0.052*
C1 0.3504 (6) −0.1317 (3) 0.1757 (2) 0.0442 (9)
C2 0.5336 (6) −0.1815 (3) 0.2109 (2) 0.0443 (9)
C4 0.4120 (7) −0.3622 (4) 0.1571 (3) 0.0615 (12)
H4 0.4340 −0.4393 0.1503 0.074*
C3 0.5612 (7) −0.2969 (3) 0.2011 (3) 0.0557 (11)
H3 0.6828 −0.3307 0.2247 0.067*
C5 0.2319 (8) −0.3142 (4) 0.1233 (3) 0.0675 (13)
H5 0.1301 −0.3584 0.0940 0.081*
C6 0.2013 (7) −0.1992 (4) 0.1330 (3) 0.0612 (12)
H6 0.0777 −0.1669 0.1102 0.073*
C8 0.3102 (6) 0.1754 (3) 0.1051 (3) 0.0497 (10)
H8A 0.4013 0.2113 0.1493 0.060*
H8B 0.1701 0.1884 0.1157 0.060*
C7 0.3103 (6) −0.0073 (3) 0.1812 (2) 0.0489 (10)
H7A 0.1683 0.0047 0.1896 0.059*
H7B 0.3968 0.0241 0.2287 0.059*
C9 0.3421 (8) 0.2266 (3) 0.0230 (3) 0.0657 (13)
H9A 0.2511 0.1906 −0.0212 0.079*
H9B 0.4822 0.2136 0.0125 0.079*
C10 0.6669 (8) −0.1210 (4) 0.3711 (3) 0.0762 (15)
H10A 0.5336 −0.0892 0.3741 0.114*
H10B 0.7662 −0.0834 0.4104 0.114*
H10C 0.6651 −0.2003 0.3840 0.114*
Cl2 0.80532 (15) 0.04958 (9) 0.07270 (6) 0.0537 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0557 (7) 0.0679 (8) 0.0632 (8) −0.0149 (6) −0.0034 (6) 0.0005 (6)
Cl1 0.0879 (9) 0.0413 (7) 0.1012 (10) 0.0074 (6) 0.0111 (7) 0.0136 (6)
N1 0.0465 (19) 0.0362 (18) 0.0467 (19) 0.0002 (14) −0.0010 (15) −0.0050 (15)
C1 0.053 (2) 0.038 (2) 0.042 (2) 0.0005 (19) 0.0068 (19) 0.0023 (17)
C2 0.050 (2) 0.041 (2) 0.040 (2) 0.0010 (18) −0.0013 (18) 0.0014 (18)
C4 0.088 (4) 0.035 (2) 0.060 (3) 0.005 (2) 0.005 (3) 0.005 (2)
C3 0.064 (3) 0.042 (2) 0.058 (3) 0.011 (2) −0.003 (2) 0.004 (2)
C5 0.088 (4) 0.050 (3) 0.058 (3) −0.018 (3) −0.011 (3) 0.001 (2)
C6 0.054 (3) 0.058 (3) 0.066 (3) −0.005 (2) −0.013 (2) 0.005 (2)
C8 0.049 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.067 (3) 0.0023 (18) 0.006 (2) −0.001 (2)
C7 0.056 (2) 0.043 (2) 0.048 (2) 0.0082 (19) 0.007 (2) 0.0038 (18)
C9 0.085 (3) 0.037 (2) 0.071 (3) 0.002 (2) −0.003 (3) 0.004 (2)
C10 0.084 (4) 0.084 (4) 0.058 (3) −0.020 (3) −0.001 (3) −0.014 (3)
Cl2 0.0499 (6) 0.0577 (7) 0.0524 (6) 0.0044 (5) 0.0020 (5) −0.0074 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

S1—C2 1.776 (4) C3—H3 0.9300
S1—C10 1.792 (5) C5—C6 1.384 (6)
Cl1—C9 1.768 (4) C5—H5 0.9300
N1—C7 1.477 (5) C6—H6 0.9300
N1—C8 1.485 (5) C8—C9 1.501 (6)
N1—H1A 0.8900 C8—H8A 0.9700
N1—H1B 0.8900 C8—H8B 0.9700
C1—C6 1.378 (5) C7—H7A 0.9700
C1—C2 1.394 (5) C7—H7B 0.9700
C1—C7 1.496 (5) C9—H9A 0.9700
C2—C3 1.386 (5) C9—H9B 0.9700
C4—C5 1.362 (6) C10—H10A 0.9600
C4—C3 1.373 (6) C10—H10B 0.9600
C4—H4 0.9300 C10—H10C 0.9600
C2—S1—C10 99.7 (2) N1—C8—C9 110.2 (3)
C7—N1—C8 114.0 (3) N1—C8—H8A 109.6
C7—N1—H1A 108.8 C9—C8—H8A 109.6
C8—N1—H1A 108.8 N1—C8—H8B 109.6
C7—N1—H1B 108.8 C9—C8—H8B 109.6
C8—N1—H1B 108.8 H8A—C8—H8B 108.1
H1A—N1—H1B 107.6 N1—C7—C1 111.1 (3)
C6—C1—C2 118.8 (4) N1—C7—H7A 109.4
C6—C1—C7 118.6 (4) C1—C7—H7A 109.4
C2—C1—C7 122.6 (3) N1—C7—H7B 109.4
C3—C2—C1 119.1 (4) C1—C7—H7B 109.4
C3—C2—S1 118.6 (3) H7A—C7—H7B 108.0
C1—C2—S1 122.3 (3) C8—C9—Cl1 110.5 (3)
C5—C4—C3 120.1 (4) C8—C9—H9A 109.5
C5—C4—H4 120.0 Cl1—C9—H9A 109.5
C3—C4—H4 120.0 C8—C9—H9B 109.5
C4—C3—C2 121.1 (4) Cl1—C9—H9B 109.5
C4—C3—H3 119.5 H9A—C9—H9B 108.1
C2—C3—H3 119.5 S1—C10—H10A 109.5
C4—C5—C6 119.6 (4) S1—C10—H10B 109.5
C4—C5—H5 120.2 H10A—C10—H10B 109.5
C6—C5—H5 120.2 S1—C10—H10C 109.5
C1—C6—C5 121.3 (4) H10A—C10—H10C 109.5
C1—C6—H6 119.3 H10B—C10—H10C 109.5
C5—C6—H6 119.3
C6—C1—C2—C3 0.7 (6) C3—C4—C5—C6 0.6 (7)
C7—C1—C2—C3 −178.2 (4) C2—C1—C6—C5 −1.2 (6)
C6—C1—C2—S1 −179.2 (3) C7—C1—C6—C5 177.8 (4)
C7—C1—C2—S1 1.9 (5) C4—C5—C6—C1 0.5 (7)
C10—S1—C2—C3 −87.1 (4) C7—N1—C8—C9 −175.9 (3)
C10—S1—C2—C1 92.8 (4) C8—N1—C7—C1 178.6 (3)
C5—C4—C3—C2 −1.1 (7) C6—C1—C7—N1 −81.3 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.4 (6) C2—C1—C7—N1 97.7 (4)
S1—C2—C3—C4 −179.7 (3) N1—C8—C9—Cl1 179.9 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1B···Cl2 0.89 2.21 3.090 (3) 169
N1—H1A···Cl2i 0.89 2.32 3.163 (3) 158

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y, −z.

References

  1. Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, P. R., Upreti, S. & Singh, A. K. (2008a). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 361, 1426–1436.
  4. Kumar, P. R., Upreti, S. & Singh, A. K. (2008b). Polyhedron, 27, 1610–1622.
  5. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  8. Singh, A. K., Amburose, C. V., Kraemer, T. S. & Jasinski, J. P. (1999). J. Organomet. Chem. 592, 251–257.
  9. Singh, P., Das, D., Kumar, A. & Singh, A. K. (2012). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 15, 163–166.
  10. Singh, P., Das, D., Prakash, O. & Singh, A. K. (2013). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 394, 77–84.
  11. Singh, P. & Singh, A. K. (2010). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 4187–4195.
  12. Singh, P. & Singh, A. K. (2012). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 387, 441–445.
  13. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, Global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008221/su5075sup1.cif

e-71-00621-sup1.cif (328.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008221/su5075Isup2.hkl

e-71-00621-Isup2.hkl (124.1KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015008221/su5075Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 299500

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES