Skip to main content
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery logoLink to Journal of Hand and Microsurgery
. 2015 May 4;7(1):79–86. doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0182-6

Capitolunate Arthrodesis for Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse (SNAC) Wrist Arthritis

Galal Hegazy 1,
PMCID: PMC4461621  PMID: 26078508

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate results of capitolunate arthrodesis for the treatment of post traumatic degenerative SNAC wrist disorders. A capitolunate arthrodesis was performed on 12 patients, three women and nine men, of 44 years in average (28–66 years). Ten patients were manual workers; dominant side was involved in seven cases with no history of previous operation. Fixation of the arthrodesis was performed with headless compression screws. Patients were reviewed at 37.4 months of average follow up (range; 12–47 months). Mayo score equal to 82.8 points. Radiolunate and capitolunate angles were decreased of 6 and 8° respectively at the final follow up radiograph compared to preoperative values. The Ten manual worker patients were able to return to their previous professional activities and the other two patients were retired but they resume their sports and recreational activities. With the advent of headless compression screws the capitolunate arthrodesis gained a higher union rate, short operative time and short rehabilitation period. In the present study the capitolunate arthrodesis allowed restoring a stable functional wrist in the 12 patients reviewed. It is a satisfactory therapeutic alternative to four corners fusion for SNAC wrist with osteoarthritis.

Keywords: Scaphoid nonunion advanced collaps, Wrist artheritis, Capitolunate fusion, Midcarpal joint fusion, Limited wrist fusion

Introduction

The natural history of untreated scaphoid nonunion is the development a pattern of progressive wrist arthritis. This condition is known as SNAC—scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (1). This condition affects the wrist joint in an expected manner. Initially, it is limited to the radial styloid and then it affects the radius scaphoid fossa and the midcarpal joint. Radiolunar joint is usually preserved even in advanced cases, since it is relatively spherical, which contributes to its permanent congruency (2). Pain and osteoarthritis are the cornerstone for treatment guidance, in which surgical treatment could be an option (3). For the purpose of staging osteoarthritis, Watson & Ballet classification system is of widespread use. It describes osteoarthritis as progressive stages formerly described for osteoarthritis secondary to scapholunate-advanced collapse SLAC wrist (4,5). It considers three stages, progressing from the radial styloid scaphoid interface, following to the radioscaphoid fossa and then the midcarpal joint is also affected (4). Vender and colleagues (6) established the term SNAC . In the SNAC wrist, the degenerative changes occurs in a different pattern from that seen in SLAC scapholunate advanced collapse. According to Vender (6), arthritis progresses in three stages. The first stage is: I, the interface between the radius scaphoid fossa and the fractured scaphoid distal fragment interface is affected. In Stage, II, the interface between the fractured scaphoid proximal fragment and capitate is also affected. In Stage III, radius-scaphoid, scaphoid-capitate and lunate-capitate interfaces are affected. In this system, the interface between the fractured scaphoid proximal pole and radius is not included, since it is frequently spared. Limited wrist fusions have become a well-accepted surgical procedure for patients with localized arthritis of the wrist. The overriding principle is that the arthritic painful components of the joint are fused, allowing the wrist to mobilize via the intact component of the joint. Central to the technique of four-corner arthrodesis is the need for a stable capitolunate fusion (7). As originally described, the hamate and triquetrum were part of the arthrodesis in order to decrease the likelihood of nonunion. Over the years, many authors have evaluated the role of an isolated capitolunate arthrodesis with or without scaphoid and/or triquetral excision to theoretically improve postoperative ROM (710). The present study evaluates the results of scaphoid excision and capitolunate arthrodesis with triquetrum and hamate sparing in 12 patients of SNAC wrist arthritis.

Patients and Methods

Twelve patients with SNAC wrist arthritis treated with scaphoid excision and capitolunate arthrodesis were analyzed. A full informed consent was obtained from each patient enrolled in this study. They were three women and nine men (mean age; 44 years range from 28 to 66 years). All of the patients were right handed with symptomatic seven right wrists and five left wrists. Seven patients were heavy manual workers, two patients were retired and two patients housewife (Table 1). The modified Mayo wrist score (11) (Table 2) was used to evaluate the patients’ clinical condition both pre-operatively and post-operatively. This scoring system depends on evaluation of four parameters; pain, range of motion in percentage to the sound side, grip strength in percentage to the sound side, and the functional status. Each parameter was evaluated and given a score of points; 0, 15, 20, or 25 and the sum of the points given for all parameters represented the final score for each patient that was subsequently interpreted into grades; excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor. The patients’ pre-operative score averaged 50.8 points (range; 45–60 points) (Table 3). A history of trauma found in seven patients, no patient had previous operation, all patients complained of wrist pain affects their daily activity and functional tasks, the pain analyzed according to visual analogue scale pain score (VAS) (12), it was average 58.1 mm (44–75 mm). Grip strength was 29.9 (13 to 40 kg) about 53 % of the sound side and the pinch grip strength was 1.13 (from 0.5 to 1.5 kg). The range of motion was measured using a two-arm goniometer, the average flexion 41.6° (from 20 to 35) about 30.9 % of sound side, the average extension 32.5° (from 30 to 45) about 46 % of sound side, the average radial tilt 8.5° (from 5 to 10) about 45 % of sound side, the average ulnar tilt 17.5° (from 20 to 25) about 45 % of sound side and pronosupination was average 132.5° (from 110 to 150) about 88.3 % of sound side (Table 4). Both pre-operative and post-operative wrist radiographs were obtained in all patients in standard fashion (antroposterior, lateral and oblique views). Radiographic staging was evaluated according to Vender (6), there were four patients stage II and eight patients stage III (Table 1). In addition, the average capitolunar angle was 28.2° (from 16 to 42), the average radiolunate angle was 31.7° (18–45) and the average carpal height ratio was 0.34 from (0.23 to 0.41). The post-operative radiographs were obtained immediately after surgery, after 6 weeks, every 2 weeks until fusion healing was achieved and then every 2 months along the follow up period. All patients had uniform technique of scaphoid excision and capitolunate fusion. The average follow-up period was 37.4 months (range; 12–47 months).

Table 1.

Per-operative parameters

Patient No Age Sex Hand Dominance Occupation Vender classification
1 32 F R T D House wife Stage III
2 45 M LT Manual worker Stage III
3 28 M RT D Manual worker Stage III
4 66 M RT D Retired Stage III
5 49 F RT D House wife Stage II
6 38 M LT Manual worker Stage II
7 42 M RT D Manual worker Stage III
8 39 M LT Manual worker Stage III
9 36 M LT Manual worker Stage II
10 65 F RT D Retired Stage III
11 47 M RT D Manual worker Stage III
12 41 M LT Manual worker Stage II

F Femal; M Male; RT Right; LT Left; D Dominant

Table 2.

Modified Mayo wrist score

Section 1 - Pain Intensity
 No pain 25
 Mild Occasional 20
 Moderate, tolerable 15
 Severe to intolerable 0
Section 2 - Functional status
 Returned to regular employment 25
 Restricted employment 20
 Able to work, but unemployed 15
 Unable to work because of pain 0
Section 3 (choose either 3a or 3b)
 3a—Range of motion (% of normal side)
  100 % 25
  75–99 % 15
  50–74 % 10
  25–49 % 5
  0–24 % 0
 3b—If only injured hand examined
 Greater than 120° 25
  90–120° 15
  60–90° 10
 30–60° 5
  less than 30° 0
Section 4 - Grip strength % of normal
 100 % 25
 75–100 % 15
 50–75 % 10
 25–50 5
 0–25 % 0

Table 3.

Pre and post- operative mayo scoring

Patient NO Pain VAS score Functional status Total ROM Grip strength % of normal side Total score
Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op
1 Moderate 65 mm No Able e protection Regular employ 60 % 82 % 50 % 81 % 50 80
2 Moderate 65 mm No Able e protection Regular employ 61.7 % 87.3 % 62 % 78 % 60 80
3 Moderate 50 mm No Able e protection Regular employ 58.8 % 79.5 % 59.6 % 83 % 50 80
4 Moderate 60 mm No Able e restriction Retired but Regular activity 62.5 % 77.5 % 40 % 79 % 45 80
5 Moderate 45 mm No Able e out protection Regular employ 57.8 % 90.2 % 53.4 % 100 % 55 90
6 Mild 44 mm No Able e out protection Regular employ 59 % 89.9 % 54.5 % 100 % 60 90
7 Moderate 72 mm No Able e restriction Regular employ 57 % 86.8 % 51.6 % 79.4 % 45 80
8 Moderate 75 mm Mild 4 mm Able e restriction Regular employ 54 % 76.9 % 52.7 % 74.5 % 45 75
9 Moderate 45 mm No Able e out protection Regular employ 59.3 % 84.8 % 60 % 100 % 55 80
10 Moderate 55 mm No Able e restriction Retired but Regular activity 61 % 79.2 % 25 % 72.9 % 45 80
11 Moderate 72 mm Mild 5 mm Able e restriction Regular employ 60.4 % 71.8 % 52.7 % 78.3 % 45 75
12 Moderate 50 mm No Able e protection Regular employ 58,4 % 65.5 % 100 % 55 90

Table 4.

Pre and post-operative clinical parameters

NO Flexion Extension Radial deviation Ulnar deviation Pronosupination Grip strength Kg Pinch grip kg
Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op
1 46 20 40 30 20 7 26 20 150 130 36 22 5 1.2
2 45 25 47 35 20 10 30 15 145 130 45 31 7.6 1.5
3 45 30 46 35 20 8 35 20 150 115 43 25 7.3 1.4
4 42 25 45 30 20 7 30 20 155 130 45 24 4.2 0.5
5 40 25 50 35 20 10 26 15 155 150 35 25 4.5 1.7
6 38 20 50 35 15 8 30 25 150 125 45 23 5.9 08
7 42 20 45 30 15 10 30 15 150 130 42 22 6.9 0.9
8 32 25 46 35 20 5 28 15 150 125 37 25 5.8 1
9 38 25 52 30 20 9 35 15 150 150 44 21 8.4 1.4
10 46 20 47 30 20 10 30 20 150 140 31 20 3.8 0.8
11 43 25 48 30 15 9 25 15 150 150 35 29 4.7 1.3
12 46 35 53 30 20 10 35 20 155 120 46 30 6.2 1.1

Surgical Technique

The patient is placed in a supine position with the arm outstretched on a hand table with a tourniquet tire to the root of the arm. Anesthesia was regional brachial in all cases. After the operative extremity is prepared and draped in standard surgical fashion, the radiocarpal and midcarpal (capitolunate) joints are identified under fluoroscopic imaging. A line is drawn between the third and fourth extensor compartment delineating the intended surgical incision. In all cases, a partial denervation resection of the posterior interosseous nerve was performed. Total scaphoidectomy was systematic. No further palmar route was necessary for the realization of this resection. Exploring the lunate facet of the radius found no cartilage damage. Denudation of the capitate head and the distal face of lunate performed without resection, preserving convexity of the capitate and the concavity of the distal face of the lunate. The lunate was reduced on the capitate and the fusion was then set by two lunocapitate headless compression screws, occasionally in two patients the screws inserted in crossing fashion. In all cases a correction of dorsal tilt of the lunate and dorsal subluxation of the capitate was attempted (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). Cancellous bone graft taken at the expense of resected scaphoid in four cases. The wrist was immobilized with a splint for an average of 48 days (45–60 days). Hospital stay averaged 3 days (2 to 6 days) (Table 5).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Skin incision between 3rd and 4th extensor compartments, b Scaphoid excision, c Denudation of the capitate head and the distal face of lunate, d Fixation of capitolunate fusion by headless compression screw

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Male patient 38 year old with SNAC right wrist stage III a) Postroanterior wrist radiograph shows scaphoid nonunion with radioscaphoid and scaphocapitate arthritis, b) Lateral wrist radiograph of the same patient shows lunocapitate arthritis and carpal collapse, c and d) 28 month postoperative radiographs show scaphoid excision and lunocapitate fusion b) Photographic pictures of the same patient show range of motion 28 months post operative

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Male patient 36 year old with SNAC left wrist stage III a) Postroanterior wrist radiograph shows scaphoid nonunion with radioscaphoid and scaphocapitate arthritis, b) Lateral wrist radiograph of the same patient shows lunocapitate arthritis and carpal collapse, c and d) 43 month postoperative radiographs show scaphoid excision and lunocapitate fusion. b Photographic pictures of the same patient show range of motion 43 months post operative

Table 5.

Post-operative follow up and fusion heeling

Paient NO Hospital staying In days Bone grafting Splinting In days Follow up period In months Healing time In days
1 3 - 45 46 70
2 2 ++ 50 47 65
3 2 - 45 39 60
4 6 +++ 60 43 90
5 3 - 45 36 60
6 4 - 45 42 70
7 2 ++ 50 37 80
8 4 - 45 45 60
9 3 - 45 12 60
10 5 +++ 60 38 90
11 3 - 50 41 60
12 2 - 45 23 60

Results

Mean follow up was 37.4 months (range; 12–47 months). Bone healing was achieved in 70 days average 60 to 90 days (Table 5). Ten patients were able to resume their complete professional activities and the other 2 patients were retired because of retirement age but they resume their sports and recreational activities. Two patients had occasional ulnar wrist pain without clear cause, the pain was mild with no need for treatment and they returned to their prior work and activities. Two patients had a carpal tunnel syndrome at the time of review (within 47 months); an electromyography was prescribed but no patient had had surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. The clinical analysis found that the average wrist flexion was 43.2° (from 32 to 46), the average extension was 32° (from 30 to 35), the average radial deviation 18.2° (from 15 to 20), the average ulnar deviation was 29.2° (from 25 to 35) and the average pronosupination 151.6 (from 150 to 155). The average grip strength was 40.3 kg about 81.2 % of sound side (rang from 31 to 46 kg); the average pinch grip strength was 5.8 kg about 72.3 % of sound side (Table 4). The radiolunate angle decreased to average (−5.8) degrees (from 0 to −8), capitolunate angles was also decreased to average (−3) degrees (from 0 to −6) and the carpal height ratio restored by average 0.49 from (0.48 to 0.52) (Table 6). The modified Mayo score was 82.8 (75 to 100) (Table 3).

Table 6.

Pre and post-operative Radiographic parameters

Patient No Radiolunate angle Capitolunate angle Carpal height ratio
Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op
1 −35 −7 32 3 0.36 0.49
2 −40 −6 37 6 0.29 0.48
3 −36 −8 30 0 0.35 0.50
4 −32 −7 30 5 0.31 0.49
5 −18 0 16 0 0.42 0.51
6 −20 0 18 0 0.40 0.52
7 −35 −6 30 5 0.31 0.49
8 −45 −8 42 6 0.24 0.48
9 −19 0 16 0 0.43 0.50
10 −42 −8 38 6 0.23 0.48
11 −37 −6 31 5 0.34 0.49
12 22 −6 18 0 0.41 0.50

Discussion

The scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) pattern is a common form of degenerative arthrosis in the human wrist (13). Degenerative changes are a result of the repetitive cycling of a malaligned carpus through its functional arc of motion with altered loads unevenly distributed between the carpus and distal radius. The radiolunate joint is protected because of the spherical lunate fossa of the distal radius as the lunate itself assumes a dorsiflexed position (14). The preservation of this joint offers a unique opportunity to treat wrist arthrosis while retaining radiocarpal joint motion. This treatment is accomplished by removing only the arthritic changes of the wrist, restoring the carpal alignment between the capitate and lunate, and performing a limited intercarpal fusion between these two carpal bones (15). The goals of successful surgery are twofold: to eliminate the patient’s pain and to preserve as much wrist motion as possible. Surgical options include radial styloidectomy, proximal row carpectomy, distraction-resection arthroplasty (16), fascial implant arthroplasty (17), radiocarpal arthrodesis (15,18), scaphoid excision with a variety of limited intercarpal arthrodesis (16,17), total wrist arthroplasty, and total wrist arthrodesis (19). The two most popular surgical procedures performed for SNAC wrist today are proximal row carpectomy and the four-corner fusion. Proximal row carpectomy requires the preservation of the capitolunate joint and is appropriate for the treatment of SNAC stage I and II. Four-corner fusion with scaphoid excision and capitate-lunate-triquetrum-hamate arthrodesis requires only the restoration of carpal alignment and is appropriate for treatment of SNAC stages I, II, and III. These two procedures are not without their problems, however. Reports comparing these two surgeries indicate that complications may occur in 35 % of patients, and failure (often requiring a second operation) may occur in 30 % (10,20). In the present study to avoid the complications of the four-corner fusion and improve union rates for capitolunate fusion, a limited approach and a headless compression screw fixation were used. The advent of headless compression screws offers the possibility of achieving capitolunate fusion through compression arthrodesis. The key to optimal functional outcome is the restoration of the capitate lunate alignment (21). The benefits of this procedure are improved rate of fusion, avoidance of pin track infections, omission of secondary hardware removal procedures, shorter operative time, and earlier return to work. Calandruccio and associates (18) described a technique of scaphoid and triquetrum excision and capitolunate arthrodesis using compression screw fixation. Excising an additional carpal bone (the triquetrum) is advocated here to increase capitolunate fusion rates, although this has not been proven biomechanically. The average flexion-extension arc in their series was 53, and grip strength was 71 % of the opposite side. The pseudarthrosis rate was 14 % (2 of 14 wrists failed to achieve solid fusion) and the percentage of patients with persistent wrist pain was (21 %). Comparing results of Calandruccio and associates(18) found that there were 100 % of capitolunate fusion rate in spite of triquetrum sparing, no pseudarthrosis or delayed union in the present study; The average flexion-extension arc in this series was 75.2°, the average radial deviation 18.2°, the average ulnar deviation was 29.2°, the average pronosupination 151.6 and grip strength was 81.2 % of the opposite side: I believed that is the advantage of rapid fusion rate, early rehabilitation, preservation of luno-triquetral motion and restoring of carpal alignment and carpal height. J. F. Slade et al. (22) treated ten patients with scapholunate advanced collapse with percutaneous capitolunate arthrodesis without bone graft using a headless cannulated compression screw. In that series, a standard Acutrak screw was used. Arthroscopic resection of scaphoid was performed on five patients, and the remaining patients were treated with minimal exposure. At 38 months’ follow-up, ten patients had solid fusions confirmed by computed tomography scan. One patient had mild occasional pain at the radial styloid but declined treatment. The remaining patients were pain-free. All patients had a functional range of motion with a 72 flexion-extension arc, 70 radial-ulnar deviation arc, and 92 supination-pronation arc. Grip strength was 90 % of the opposite normal uninjured wrist. There were no complications and all patients returned to their prior work and avocations. The series of J.F. Slade et al. (22) supports the idea considering capitolunate arthrodesis is a valuable alternative to four corner fusion in treatment of selected post carpal instability wrist arthritis. Another point of view in spite of J.F. Slade et al. (22) treated ten patients with scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) wrist arthritis using arthroscopic assisted percutaneous approach, the results of the present study which used limited open dorsal approach impending the results of J.F. Slade et al. (22) all the 12 patients had solid fusions and all patients returned to their prior work and avocations.

Conclusion

Scaphoid excision, stable fusion fixation by headless compression screws, short operative time and limited surgical exposure yield a high capitolunate fusion rate with minimal morbidity which eliminates wrist pain. Preservation of luno-triquetral joint motion, restoring of carpal alignment and restoring of carpal height improve the post fusion wrist function. The lowered complication rate and improved wrist function post capitolunate fusion make it a valuable alternative to four corner fusion in treatment of selected SNAC wrist arthritis.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/ or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standers.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  • 1.Proctor MT. Non-union of the scaphoid: early and late management. Injury. 1994;25(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90178-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moritomo H, Tada K, Yoshida T. Masatomi T The rela tionship between the site of nonunion of the scaphoid and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999;81(5):871–876. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krimmer H, Krapohl B, Sauerbier M. Hahn P Post-traumatic carpal collapse (SLAC- and SNAC-wrist)—stage classification and therapeutic possibilities. Hand Chir Mikro Chir Plast Chir. 1997;29(5):228–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Watson HK, Ballet FL. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg [Am] 1984;9(3):358–365. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80223-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watson HK, Ryu J. Evolution of arthritis of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;202:57–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vender MI, Watson HK, Wiener BD, Black DM. Degenerative change in symptomatic scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg [Am] 1987;12(4):514–519. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80198-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krakauer JD, Bishop AT, Cooney WP. Surgical treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse. J Hand Surg [Am] 1994;19(5):751–759. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90178-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dacho AK, Baumeister S, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Comparison of proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC-wrist) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC-wrist) in stage II. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(10):1210–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Manske PR, Rotman MB, Pruitt DL, Szerzinski J. Scaphocapitolunate arthrodesis. J Hand Surg [Am] 1993;18(1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90240-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Simmen BR, Bloch HR. Partial arthrodesis of the carpal bones in advanced carpal collapse in chronic scapholunar instability and following scaphoid pseudarthrosis [in German] Orthopadics. 1993;22(1):79–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bumbasirevic M, Tomic S, Lesic A, Bumbasirevic V, Rakocevic Z, Atkinson HD. The treatment of scaphoid nonunion using the Ilizarov fixator without bone graft, a study of 18 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:57–66. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burckhardt CS, Jones KD. Adult measures of pain: The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Verbal Descriptive Scale (VDS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and West Haven-Yale Multidisci-plinary Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:S96–S104. doi: 10.1002/art.11440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Watson HK, Ryu J, Akelman E. Limited triscaphoid intercarpal arthrodesis for rotary subluxation of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:345–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Watson HK, Weinzweig J. Intercarpal arthrodesis. In: Green DP, editor. Operative Hand Surgery. 4. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. pp. 108–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ashmead D, IV, Watson HK, Damon C, et al. Scapholunate advanced collapse wrist salvage. J Hand Surg [Am] 1994;19:741–750. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fitzgerald JP, Peimer CA, Smith RJ. Distraction resection arthroplasty of the wrist. J Hand Surg [Am] 1989;14:774–781. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(89)80075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nervaiser RJ. Proximal row carpectomy for post-traumatic disorders of the carpus. J Hand Surg [Am] 1983;8:301–305. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80165-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Calandruccio JH, Gelberman RH, Duncan SF, et al. Capitolunate arthrodesis with scaphoid and triquetrum excision. J Hand Surg [Am] 2000;25:824–832. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.16364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Imbriglia JE, Broudy AS, Hagberg WC, McKernan D. Proximal row carpectomy: clinical evaluation. J Hand Surg [Am] 1990;15:426–430. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(90)90054-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Larsen CF, Jacoby RA, McCabe SJ. Nonunion rates of limited carpal arthrodesis: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997;22:66–73. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80181-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wheeler DL, McLoughlin SW. Biomechanical assessment of compression screws. Clin Orthop. 1998;350:237–245. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199805000-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Joseph F, Slade MD III, David A, Bomback MD (2003) Percutaneous capitolunate arthrodesis using arthroscopic or limited approach. Atlas Hand Clin 149–162

Articles from Journal of Hand and Microsurgery are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES