Skip to main content
PMC home page
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2015 May 21;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0954-1

Neuroprotective properties of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate and its relationship to interleukin 6 after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study

Anke Höllig 1,2,✉, Miriam Thiel 3, Birgit Stoffel-Wagner 4, Mark Coburn 2, Hans Clusmann 1
PMCID: PMC4462180  PMID: 25993987

Abstract

Introduction

The established neuroprotective property of the sex steroid precursor dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) has not yet been investigated in the context of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The influence of DHEAS on inflammatory response resulting in modulation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) synthesis has been shown. Here, we evaluate DHEAS serum levels after aSAH (day 0–14) and levels of IL-6 related to functional outcome at discharge and at six months.

Methods

A complete data set (DHEAS and IL-6 serum levels for days 0, 1, 4, 7, 10 and 14 after aSAH) and outcome assessment at discharge according to modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) was available for 53 patients of the initially screened cohort (n = 109). Outcome assessment six months after aSAH was obtained from 41 patients. Logarithmized levels of DHEAS and IL-6 were related to dichotomized functional outcome either assessed at discharge or at six months. A mixed between-within subjects ANOVA was applied for statistical analysis (SPSS 21.0).

Results

DHEAS and IL-6 levels across time were related to functional outcome. Regarding outcome assessment at discharge and at six months after aSAH, DHEAS levels (transformed to square root for statistical purposes) were considerably higher in patients with favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) (p = .001; p = .020). Inversely, in patients with favorable outcome either at discharge or six months after aSAH, lower IL-6 levels (logarithmized for statistical purposes) were observed across time (both p < .001).

Conclusion

We provide new evidence that DHEAS is associated with protective properties resulting in improvement of functional outcome after aSAH, possibly by influencing the inflammatory response after aSAH shown in the decreasing IL-6 serum levels. But the results for outcome six months after SAH are limited due to a high drop-out rate.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0954-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe condition. Despite a gradual decrease over the last decades, case fatality still accounts for 40 % [1]. Patients affected are younger (mean 52 years) than those struck by ischemic stroke. Therefore, and due to a high rate of patients with permanent deficits, individual implications as well as the costs for society are enormous [2, 3]. There is evidence that hormonal influence, specifically neuroprotective effects achieved by sex steroids, may alleviate the brain injury generated by aSAH [4–6]. While the clinical finding that female sex is a risk factor for aSAH consolidated this hypothesis, it has only been demonstrated in older cohorts (>50 years) [7–9]. However, the data are still conflicting with no definite consensus on the possible influence and mechanism of sex steroid action after aSAH [10].

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is the sulfate ester of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA); both are multifunctional steroid hormones and precursors of sex steroids constituting the most abundant human steroid hormones [11]. DHEAS easily crosses the blood brain barrier [12]. Within the central nervous system, it displays various effects contributing to neuroprotection, such as anti-inflammatory, pro-survival and anti-glucocorticoid properties [11]. Experimental and clinical studies have repeatedly reported the neuroprotective properties of DHEAS [13–16].

DHEAS also influences neuroinflammation: synthesis of IL-6, a major cytokine involved in neuroinflammation [17], may be inhibited by DHEAS [18] and a negative correlation of DHEAS with IL-6 has been shown in vitro [19]. In a physiological state, IL-6 plays a role in neuropoiesis and neurogenesis [20, 21], whereas under pathophysiological conditions, it is one of the major stimuli of neuroinflammatory response [17, 22–24]. With respect to aSAH, there is evidence that higher early serum IL-6 levels predict an unfavorable outcome most probably by contributing to the early inflammatory response after aSAH as part of early brain injury [25].

Given the neuroprotective effects of DHEAS and its interaction with IL-6, this linkage of the neuroendocrine with the neuroinflammatory system may exert neuroprotective properties via DHEAS-mediated attenuation of the early inflammatory response. Thus, we aimed to assess the role of DHEAS and its relation to IL-6 after aSAH. By analyzing DHEAS and IL-6 serum levels across time and relating these results to functional outcome (determined by modified Rankin scale score (mRs) at discharge and 6 months after aSAH), we aimed to elucidate the potential beneficial effects of DHEAS and its relationship with neuroinflammation.

Methods

The prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Germany; EK 199/08). Written informed consent was obtained from patients or legal representatives. Within a 21-month period (February 2009 to November 2010) 109 consecutive patients with a proven aSAH were screened for eligibility. Patients were not eligible if they were younger than 18 years, enrolled in other clinical trials, admitted more than 12 h after onset or if informed consent could not be obtained. In total, 81 patients (74 %) were included. At admission, demographic data, severity score for aSAH according to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) classification and time span to clinical ictus were assessed. Treatment of patients was carried out according to standardized guidelines [26]. Serum levels of DHEAS (lower limit of detection (LOD) 150 ng/ml) and IL-6 (LOD 2 pg/ml) were measured directly at admission and on days 1, 4, 7, 10 and 14 after aSAH (always in the morning) in line with routine diagnostics at the Department of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Bonn. Samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2000 g prior to processing.

At discharge and 6 months thereafter, functional outcome according to the mRS was determined. For statistical analysis, the mRS was dichotomized (mRS 0–2 = favorable, mRS 3–6 = unfavorable). Scores according to the WFNS grading scale were also dichotomized with WFNS 1–3 defined as mild hemorrhage and WFNS 4 and 5 defined as severe hemorrhage. Furthermore, patient age was dichotomized to assess age-dependent differences (age <55 years vs >55 years).

Normality of the distribution was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Data were checked for outliers, and the data for one patient had to be removed (100-fold increase of IL-6 levels at day 1 compared to other results from the same patient). For descriptive analysis, mean, minimum and maximum values, standard deviation (SD) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated. Graphs show mean values and 95 % CI. For skewed data, the mixed between-within subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) data were tested for normal distribution. Sphericity assumption was checked; violation (significant Mauchly test) was compensated for using Greenhouse-Geisser or Huyn-Feldt corrected degrees of freedom as alternative requirements for appropriate analysis. Data were transformed (using logarithm (log) or square root (sqrt)) to ensure homogeneity of variances and sphericity (or its respective alternative requirements). Subgroup analyses (for gender, age and WFNS score) were only performed related to outcome at discharge, due to the small sample size. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 21.0 software. All graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism 6.

Results

Baseline characteristics

At admission, samples were available for analysis from 76 of the 81 patients (94 %) initially included (Fig. 1). Data for one patient had to be excluded prior to analysis due to an outlier value. Baseline data for the remaining 75 patients are shown in Table 1. Due to patient deaths (total n = 10; 13 % of the patients initially included) or incomplete data (n = 12; 16 % of the patients initially included) the sample size decreased over time leaving data for 53 of 81 patients (65 %) available for analysis on day 14. Complete datasets (measured values for day 0–14) for outcome according to mRS 6 months after aSAH were available for 41 patients (51 %).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Flowchart of patients enrolled. Diagram of patient enrolment and subsequent data analysis. aSAH Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics
Number of patients n = 75
Sex (female) n = 49 (65 %)
Mean age +/−SD (yrs) 53 +/−13
WFNS:
WFNS 1 n = 22 (29 %)
WFNS 2 n = 13 (17 %)
WFNS 3 n = 5 (7 %)
WFNS 4 n = 14 (19 %)
WFNS 5 n = 21 (28 %)
Aneurysm treatment:
Endovascular treatment n = 52 (69 %)
Surgical treatment n = 23 (31 %)
Open in a new tab

WFNS World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies score

Time Course of serum DHEAS levels

DHEAS serum levels were assessed from day 0 to day 14 of the inpatient stay (always in the morning) (Table 2; Fig. 2).

Table 2.

DHEAS levels during the inpatient stay

Minimum Maximum Mean SD 95 % CI Number
DHEAS day 0 <150 5260 1197 941 884, 1367 75
DHEAS day 1 <150 4460 961 850 671, 1105 73
DHEAS day 4 <150 2840 554 593 363, 675 68
DHEAS day 7 <150 3780 546 670 356, 676 66
DHEAS day 10 <150 5770 639 968 370, 792 62
DHEAS day 14 <150 2560 515 543 360, 666 53
Open in a new tab

Time course of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) levels (ng/ml) during the inpatient stay (up to day 14 after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Number number of patients analyzed

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Time course of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) and IL-6 related to outcome at discharge. Time course of DHEAS (a) and IL-6 (b) serum levels (mean + 95 % CI) related to dichotomized outcome at discharge (according to the modified Rankin scale score (mRS)

As DHEAS levels are dependent on gender and age, additional analysis of data for each subgroup was performed: DHEAS levels over time are shown in relation to gender (Additional file 1: Figure S1A) and to age (<55 years vs >55 years) (Additional file 1: Figure S1B). Mixed ANOVA with gender as a between-subjects effect did not show a significant difference in DHEAS levels (expressed as sqrtDHEAS) (F (1, 50) = .155; p = .695). However, with age as the between-subjects effect there was a significant difference between the time course of DHEAS levels (expressed as its sqrt) (F (1, 50) = 4.5; p = .039).

The clinical time course after aSAH is influenced considerably by the severity of injury. Therefore, the time course of DHEAS levels were analyzed related to severity of hemorrhage. As a surrogate parameter classification according to the WFNS grading scale was used (WFNS 1–3 = mild; WFNS 4, 5 = severe). The time course of DHEAS levels did not differ in relation to the severity of injury (Additional file 1: Figure S1C) (F (1, 50) = 2.79; p = .101).

DHEAS levels related to outcome at discharge and 6 months after aSAH

To evaluate the possibility of correlation of DHEAS levels on outcome, DHEAS serum levels were analyzed related to patients’ outcome at discharge (expressed via dichotomized mRS) (Table 3, Fig. 2a). Overall, higher serum DHEAS levels were found in the subgroup with favorable outcome at discharge.

Table 3.

DHEAS levels during the inpatient stay according to functional outcome at discharge (dichotomized modified Rankin Scale score)

Minimum Maximum Mean SD 95 % CI Number
DHEAS day 0
Favorable <150 5260 1431 1077 1081, 1782 38
Unfavorable <150 2370 955 730 712, 1199 37
DHEAS day 1
Favorable <150 4460 1132 989 802, 1462 37
Unfavorable <150 2740 785 646 566, 1004 36
DHEAS day 4
Favorable <150 2840 710 662 486, 934 36
Unfavorable <150 1700 223 453 215, 542 32
DHEAS day 7
Favorable <150 3780 781 796 507, 1054 35
Unfavorable <150 1110 282 343 156, 407 31
DHEAS day 10
Favorable <150 5770 961 1202 542, 1380 34
Unfavorable <150 937 247 245 152, 342 28
DHEAS day 14
Favorable <150 2560 634 602 405, 863 29
Unfavorable <150 1520 371 430 189, 553 24
Open in a new tab

Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) levels (ng/ml) during the acute stage of disease according to dichotomized (Favorable vs Unfavorable modified Rankin Scale score) outcome at discharge. Number number of cases analyzed

To additionally assess long-term effects, the correlation between early DHEAS levels and levels at 6-month follow up was analyzed. DHEAS serum levels at days 0–14 were also found to be related to outcome 6 months after aSAH (expressed as the dichotomized mRS; Table 4; Fig. 2b). However, a high drop-out rate hampers the interpretation of the long-term results.

Table 4.

DHEAS levels during the inpatient stay according to functional outcome 6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (dichotomized modified Rankin scale score)

Minimum Maximum Mean SD 95 % CI Number
DHEAS day 0
Favorable <150 5260 1411 1161 1000, 1823 33
Unfavorable <150 2310 1052 678 766, 1338 24
DHEAS day 1
Favorable <150 4460 1135 1035 768, 1502 33
Unfavorable <150 2740 820 609 563, 1077 24
DHEAS day 4
Favorable <150 2840 699 700 451, 948 33
Unfavorable <150 1700 515 497 283, 748 20
DHEAS day 7
Favorable <150 3780 770 838 467, 1072 32
Unfavorable <150 1110 339 324 187, 491 20
DHEAS day 10
Favorable 155 5770 982 1251 523, 1441 31
Unfavorable <150 776 255 249 127, 383 17
DHEAS day 14
Favorable <150 2560 669 604 435, 903 28
Unfavorable <150 1090 359 342 153, 566 13
Open in a new tab

Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) levels (ng/ml) during acute stage of disease according to dichotomized (Favorable vs Unfavorable) outcome 6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Number number of cases analyzed

To objectify this observation, mixed between-within subjects ANOVA was conducted to compare the time course of DHEAS levels with respect to outcome (expressed as dichotomized mRS). Due to skewed data and to fulfil the demands of sphericity and homogeneity of variances, DHEAS levels were expressed as its sqrt. The between-subjects effect (outcome at discharge) was strongly significant (F (1, 50) = 12.98; p <.0005) with higher sqrtDHEAS levels over the observation period in patients with favorable outcome at discharge. Although across time the serum DHEAS levels changed significantly (F (4.36, 218.19) = 21.81; p <.0005), this pattern of change did not differ between the two outcome groups (interaction of DHEAS across time with outcome, F (4.36, 218.19) = 1.29; p = .272). We demonstrated a different time course of DHEAS levels over time for patients with a favorable outcome at discharge compared to those with an unfavorable outcome (p <.0005). As DHEAS levels differed significantly with age, we performed subgroup analysis by patient age (<55 years vs >55 years) (Additional file 2: Figure S2): the time course of DHEAS levels (sqrtDHEAS) in relation to outcome at discharge was significantly different in both groups, but this difference was more pronounced in the younger patients (<55 years, F (1, 27) = 8.16; p = .008; >55 years, F (1, 20) = 4.63; p = .044). However, the sample size of the subgroups was very small.

Mixed ANOVA was also conducted for dichotomized outcome assessed 6 months after aSAH. Again, on analysis of the between-subjects effect (outcome 6 months after aSAH) there was a significant difference in sqrtDHEAS levels (F (1, 38) = 5.89; p = .020) between the two outcome groups. As expected from the analysis of outcome at discharge, longitudinal change in serum DHEAS levels did not differ between the two outcome groups (F (5, 190) = 1.39; p = .229), but sqrtDHEAS serum levels changed significantly over time (F (5, 190) = 13.7; p <.0005). Subgroup analysis of the outcome 6 months after aSAH was not performed due to the small sample size.

These results suggest a distinct time course of DHEAS levels in patients with a favorable outcome compared to those with an unfavorable outcome. Specifically, there is evidence for higher DHEAS serum levels across time in patients with a favorable outcome at least when assessed at discharge.

Time course of serum IL-6 levels

Serum IL-6 levels were also measured over the whole observation period (days 0–14, always in the morning) (Table 5, Fig. 3).

Table 5.

IL-6 levels during the inpatient stay

Minimum Maximum Mean SD 95 % CI Number
IL-6 day 0 <2 529 24 63 10, 39 75
IL-6 day 1 <2 194 26 33 19, 34 73
IL-6 day 4 <2 878 37 113 10, 65 68
IL-6 day 7 <2 413 30 61 15, 45 66
IL-6 day 10 <2 241 20 36 11, 29 62
IL-6 day 14 <2 905 33 124 −1, 67 53
Open in a new tab

Time course of IL-6 levels (pg/ml) during the inpatient stay (up to day 14 after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage). Number number of cases analyzed

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Time course of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) and IL-6 related to outcome 6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Time course of DHEAS (a) and IL-6 (b) serum levels (mean + 95 % CI) related to dichotomized outcome 6 months after aSAH (according to the modified Rankin scale score (mRS))

Analogous to DHEAS, serum IL-6 levels across time (Table 5, Fig. 3) were also related to outcome according to dichotomized mRS at discharge and 6 months after aSAH (Tables 6 and 7, Fig. 3b).

Table 6.

IL-6 levels during the inpatient stay according to functional outcome at discharge (dichotomized modified Rankin scale score)

Minimum Maximum Mean SD 95 % CI Number
IL-6 day 0
Favorable <2 109 12 20 6, 18 38
Unfavorable <2 529 37 86 9, 66 37
IL-6 day 1
Favorable <2 122 18 22 11, 25 37
Unfavorable 3 194 35 40 21, 49 35
IL-6 day 4
Favorable <2 175 14 30 4, 25 36
Unfavorable <2 878 63 160 5, 120 32
IL-6 day 7
Favorable <2 53 12 14 7, 16 35
Unfavorable <2 413 51 84 20, 82 31
IL-6 day 10
Favorable <2 33 8 8 5, 11 35
Unfavorable 3 241 34 50 15, 53 28
IL-6 day 14
Favorable <2 30 6 6 4, 9 29
Unfavorable 2 905 65 181 −12, 141 24
Open in a new tab

IL-6 levels (pg/ml) during the acute stage of disease according to dichotomized (Favorable vs Unfavorable) outcome at discharge. Number number of cases analyzed

Table 7.

IL-6 levels during the inpatient stay according to functional outcome 6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (dichotomized modified Rankin scale score)

Minimum Maximum Mean SD 95 % CI Number
IL-6 day 0
Favorable 2 109 14 21 7, −22 33
Unfavorable <2 529 46 16 1, 90 24
IL-6 day 1
Favorable <2 122 20 23 11, 28 32
Unfavorable 3 194 34 43 16, 53 24
IL-6 day 4
Favorable <2 315 19 55 −1, 38 33
Unfavorable 5 129 29 31 14, 43 20
IL-6 day 7
Favorable <2 60 12 13 7, 17 32
Unfavorable <2 413 61 101 14, 109 20
IL-6 day 10
Favorable <2 33 9 9 6, 12 32
Unfavorable <2 241 31 56 2, 59 17
IL-6 day 14
Favorable <2 42 9 10 5, 12 28
Unfavorable 6 75 27 22 13, 40 13
Open in a new tab

IL-6 levels (pg/ml) during the acute stage of disease according to dichotomized (Favorable vs Unfavorable) outcome 6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Number number of cases analyzed

As the severity of injury also might influence IL-6 secretion, the time course of serum IL-6 levels was analyzed in relation to the dichotomized WFNS score. Especially during the early time course, serum IL-6 levels differed visibly (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Objectified by mixed ANOVA, serum IL-6 levels (expressed as logIL-6) varied over time in relation to the WFNS score (F (1, 43) = 8.62; p = .005).

Corresponding to the DHEAS analysis, mixed between-within subjects ANOVA was conducted to evaluate IL-6 serum levels across time in relation to outcome. Due to skewed data, serum logIL-6 levels were calculated prior to analysis. Across time, the logIL-6 levels did not change significantly (F (3.97, 170.84) = 1.94; p = .116). Comparing the two outcome groups at discharge (favorable vs unfavorable) the pattern of logIL-6 levels did not differ between the groups (F (3.97, 170.84) = .886; p = .473). Of note, the between-within subject effect indicating different time courses of logIl-6 levels in relation to the dichotomized outcome score (favorable vs unfavorable) was strongly significant (F (1, 43) = 32.08; p < .0005). Thus, these results suggest a difference in IL-6 levels, with higher IL-6 levels across time in the group with an unfavorable outcome.

In the subgroups with WFNS 1–3 vs WFNS 4, 5, there was a significant difference in the time course of serum IL-6 (logIL-6) levels in relation to outcome at discharge in both subgroups (mild hemorrhage WFNS 1–3, F (1, 20) = 5.08; p = .036; severe hemorrhage WFNS 4, 5, F (1, 21) = 16.85; p = .001), but again the sample size was small (Additional file 4: Figure S4).

For outcome assessed 6 months after aSAH, no significant main effects were noted for time (F (4.68, 154.4) = .948; p = .448) or interaction of time and outcome after 6 months (F (4.68, 154.4) = .878; p = .492). Again, the main effect comparing the two outcome groups was significant (F (1, 33) = 17.15; p <.0005) suggesting a difference between the outcome groups in IL-6 levels over time, with higher IL-6 levels in the group with an unfavorable long-term outcome.

Discussion

A favorable outcome at discharge and 6 months after aSAH was related to higher DHEAS serum levels during the acute treatment period after aSAH. Inversely, serum levels of IL-6 were considerably lower in patients with a favorable outcome. Thus, we might assume that there is a functional link between the anti-inflammatory properties of DHEAS and the less pronounced inflammatory reaction in terms of IL-6 expression after aSAH, resulting in an improved outcome.

DHEAS has demonstrated multiple neuroprotective effects [14–16, 27]. Multiple mechanisms of action have been suggested, such as modulation of Gamma-aminobutyric-acid-A(GABAA)-receptor signaling [15, 28], inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor function, sigma receptor or glutamate receptor signaling [12, 29]. Genomic and non-genomic signaling via direct interaction with postsynaptic receptors has been demonstrated [30]. However, the mechanism of action remains uncertain and seems to be versatile, resulting in multiple effects, such as anti-inflammatory action. In fact, sex hormones modulate the immune system [31, 32]. An influence on IL-6 synthesis has been demonstrated specifically for DHEAS [33, 34]. Apart from physiological derangements (such as elevation of intracranial pressure and reduction of cerebral blood flow), oxidative and metabolic disturbances, pathological acute vascular reactions, ionic changes etc., inflammatory reactions arise early after aSAH [35, 36]. Currently, it is assumed that these pathological mechanisms contribute largely to the development of secondary injuries and, finally, to the limited chance for favorable outcome after aSAH. Lower IL-6 levels were shown to be related to an improved outcome [25]. Elevated DHEAS and reduced IL-6 serum levels measured in patients with a favorable outcome possibly indicate a protective hormonal and inflammatory pattern. This effect may be assumed to be the result of the anti-inflammatory properties of DHEAS leading to decreased IL-6 synthesis, thus confirming the well-known link between the neuroendocrine and immune network [31].

Additionally, decreased DHEA(S) levels have been related to the risk of cardiovascular diseases, reducing the incidence of cardiovascular pathologies [13, 37]. Vasoprotective properties inhibiting remodeling after vascular injury have been observed in experimental studies [38]. However, the results of published clinical studies are conflicting [39]. Despite these uncertainties, neurosteroids are still regarded as promising therapeutic agents because there is substantial experimental evidence for beneficial cardiovascular effects due to anti-inflammatory, vasorelaxant and anti-remodeling properties [40, 41]. In a model for vascular remodeling, DHEA alleviates oxidative stress and inflammation with decreased IL-6 mRNA expression via inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/nuclear factor κB (p38 MAPK/NF-κB) [38]. These vasoprotective properties, which ameliorate oxidative and inflammatory stress after vascular lesions, may also contribute to the suspected beneficial effect of higher DHEAS serum levels after aSAH. Thus, an anti-inflammatory reaction by DHEAS resulting in IL-6 synthesis could also occur locally, i.e. directly at the affected vessels.

Limitations of this study arise from its relatively small and inhomogeneous cohort (both sexes, wide age range, aSAH graded WFNS 1–5). Therefore, standard variations are considerably high. Furthermore, there was a substantial drop-out rate in relation to the outcome assessment 6 months after aSAH. Patients lost to follow up are most likely those with an unfavorable outcome. Therefore, our long-term results are biased by the response rate 6 months after aSAH and are insufficient to assess the relationship between long-term outcome and the time course of DHEAS levels. More reliable results may be obtained by a follow-up study with a larger and more homogeneous cohort as well as a tighter follow-up schedule.

Only DHEAS but not DHEA or androstenedione (ASD) was assessed. DHEAS forms the pool for DHEA and ASD. Furthermore, conversion of downstream steroid hormones is based on the presence of DHEAS. Therefore, DHEAS levels reflect the reservoir for further synthesis. Another advantage of choosing DHEAS as a marker for the presence of neuroactive steroid is its stability and feasibility of detection. Thus, as already shown by various previous studies, we favor the approach of determining DHEAS as a surrogate marker for neuroactive steroids.

Outcome assessed according to the mRS only roughly reflects the neurological and functional status of the patients. Moreover, outcome scores were dichotomized for analysis. Thus, subtle discrete changes in outcome are not detectable by this approach. Age and gender influence DHEAS levels: subgroup analyses were performed to rule out major flaws and even if the age-dependent subgroups are examined, DHEAS levels over time differed in relation to outcome at discharge. However, the sample size for subgroup analysis was too small to make a firm conclusion.

The same applies to IL-6 serum levels: an increase in IL-6, especially when measured in serum, may reflect an unspecific response to stress and cytokine production, may be related more to a global inflammatory reaction than to a specific pathophysiological mechanism involved in early brain injury after aSAH. Nevertheless, in line with our initial hypothesis, subgroup analysis according to WFNS score also revealed a significantly different time course for serum IL-6 levels in patients with an unfavorable outcome compared to those with a favorable outcome. Alhough serum IL-6 probably does not reflect the extent of neuroinflammation after aSAH in detail, it may serve as an easily accessible (though unspecific) surrogate parameter for global inflammatory burden after aSAH. However, regardless of its final interpretation, use of serum IL-6 instead of cerebral (measured by microdialysis) or cerebrospinal fluid IL-6 is indispensable in relating the results to DHEAS levels, which have also been measured in serum.

The time course of DHEAS and IL-6 is difficult to interpret. There is a distinct pattern for IL-6 with a peak at day 4 followed by a slow decrease. By contrast, DHEAS dropped towards day 4 and roughly remained at the current level. Though the time course of IL-6 and that of DHEAS behave conversely, the mechanism behind these patterns remains unidentified. Occurrence of both delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and death during the inpatient time course in our patient group peaked after day 4 (DCI day 7, death day 10). Even if regarded as an early biomarker peak, the IL-6 levels at day 4 followed by a decrease are not plausibly explained by the occurrence of DCI at day 7, neither by death at day 10. Finally, mostly descriptive data are presented. Based on the complexity of interactions, skewed data, confounders and the dynamic acquisition of data, the data analysis and interpretation is difficult and error-prone when evaluating a small and inhomogeneous cohort.

Conclusion

Taken together, we present for the first time the serum profiles of DHEAS and IL-6 during the acute stage after aSAH and their relationship to outcome. There is evidence that DHEAS exerts protective effects with improvement of functional outcome after aSAH, possibly by influencing the inflammatory response after aSAH by decreasing IL-6 serum levels. Further studies with a larger sample size are necessary to better adjust for confounders such as age, gender or smoking status.

Key messages

  • Higher DHEAS levels may be beneficial to functional outcome after aSAH.

  • The possible action of mechanism may be a modulation of the inflammatory response after aSAH by DHEAS, resulting in decreased IL-6 serum levels.

Acknowledgements

We thank Johannes Schramm for financial support. We are grateful to Jennifer Nadal for her assistance with statistical analysis.

Abbreviations

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

aSAH

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

ASD

Androstenedione

DHEA

Dehydroepiandrosterone

DHEAS

Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate

GABAA

Gamma-aminobutyric-acid-A

IL-6

Interleukin 6

LOD

Lower limit of detection

log

Logarithm

mRNA

Messenger ribonucleic acid

mRS

Modified Rankin Scale score

NF-κB

Nuclear factor κB

NMDA

N-methyl-D-aspartate

p38 MAPK

p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase

sqrt

Square root

WFNS

World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies

Additional files

Additional file 1: Figure S1. (56KB, tiff)

Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) levels related to gender (A), age <55 years vs >55 years (B) and World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) score at admission (WFNS 1–3 vs WFNS 4–5) (C). aSAH Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. (68.4KB, tiff)

Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) related to gender with respect to outcome at discharge. A Patient cohort <55 years of age related to outcome. B patient cohort >55 years of age related to outcome. aSAH Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, mRs Modified Rankin scale.

Additional file 3: Figure S3. (20KB, tiff)

IL-6 levels related to initial World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) score (WFNS 1–3 vs WFNS 4–5). aSAH Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Additional file 4: Figure S4. (65.4KB, tiff)

IL-6 levels related to initial World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) score with respect to outcome at discharge: A Patients with initial WFNS score 1–3. B Patients with initial WFNS score 4–5. DHEAS Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AH conceived the study, analyzed the data and wrote the preliminary draft. MT carried out the sample acquisition and compilation of clinical data; MT assisted in data analysis. BS organized and supervised analysis of serum and CSF samples; BS assisted in interpretation of data. MC participated in the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. HC participated in the design of the study and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Anke Höllig, Email: ahoellig@ukaachen.de.

Miriam Thiel, Email: thiel_miriam@web.de.

Birgit Stoffel-Wagner, Email: Birgit.Stoffel-Wagner@ukb.uni-bonn.de.

Mark Coburn, Email: mcoburn@ukaachen.de.

Hans Clusmann, Email: hclusmann@ukaachen.de.

References

  • 1.Lovelock CE, Rinkel GJ, Rothwell PM. Time trends in outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage: Population-based study and systematic review. Neurology. 2010;74:1494–501. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dd42b3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010;41:e519–36. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dodel R, Winter Y, Ringel F, Spottke A, Gharevi N, Muller I, et al. Cost of illness in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a German longitudinal study. Stroke. 2010;41:2918–23. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.586826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kao CH, Chang CZ, Su YF, Tsai YJ, Chang KP, Lin TK, et al. 17beta-Estradiol attenuates secondary injury through activation of Akt signaling via estrogen receptor alpha in rat brain following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Surg Res. 2013;183:e23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yan F, Hu Q, Chen J, Wu C, Gu C, Chen G. Progesterone attenuates early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2013;543:163–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sun X, Ji C, Hu T, Wang Z, Chen G. Tamoxifen as an effective neuroprotectant against early brain injury and learning deficits induced by subarachnoid hemorrhage: possible involvement of inflammatory signaling. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:157. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Korja M, Silventoinen K, Laatikainen T, Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Hernesniemi J, et al. Risk factors and their combined effects on the incidence rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage–a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Feigin VL, Rinkel GJ, Lawes CM, Algra A, Bennett DA, van Gijn J, et al. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage: an updated systematic review of epidemiological studies. Stroke. 2005;36:2773–80. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190838.02954.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mhurchu CN, Anderson C, Jamrozik K, Hankey G, Dunbabin D, Australasian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study G Hormonal factors and risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international population-based, case-control study. Stroke. 2001;32:606–12. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.3.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Algra AM, Klijn CJ, Helmerhorst FM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Female risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Neurology. 2012;79:1230–6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826aace6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maninger N, Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Epel ES, Mellon SH. Neurobiological and neuropsychiatric effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA sulfate (DHEAS) Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30:65–91. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stoffel-Wagner B. Neurosteroid metabolism in the human brain. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;145:669–79. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1450669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barrett-Connor E, Khaw KT, Yen SS. A prospective study of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, mortality, and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1519–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612113152405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hillen T, Lun A, Reischies FM, Borchelt M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Schaub RT. DHEA-S plasma levels and incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:161–3. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00217-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lapchak PA, Chapman DF, Nunez SY, Zivin JA. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is neuroprotective in a reversible spinal cord ischemia model: possible involvement of GABA(A) receptors. Stroke. 2000;31:1953–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.8.1953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Spath-Schwalbe E, Dodt C, Dittmann J, Schuttler R, Fehm HL. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in Alzheimer disease. Lancet. 1990;335:1412. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91298-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Erta M, Quintana A, Hidalgo J. Interleukin-6, a major cytokine in the central nervous system. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8:1254–66. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kipper-Galperin M, Galilly R, Danenberg HD, Brenner T. Dehydroepiandrosterone selectively inhibits production of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 [correction of interlukin-6] in astrocytes. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1999;17:765–75. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5748(99)00067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Straub RH, Konecna L, Hrach S, Rothe G, Kreutz M, Scholmerich J, et al. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA sulfate are negatively correlated with serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), and DHEA inhibits IL-6 secretion from mononuclear cells in man in vitro: possible link between endocrinosenescence and immunosenescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:2012–7. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.6.4876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deverman BE, Patterson PH. Cytokines and CNS development. Neuron. 2009;64:61–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bauer S, Kerr BJ, Patterson PH. The neuropoietic cytokine family in development, plasticity, disease and injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:221–32. doi: 10.1038/nrn2054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suzuki S, Tanaka K, Suzuki N. Ambivalent aspects of interleukin-6 in cerebral ischemia: inflammatory versus neurotrophic aspects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:464–79. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hull M, Strauss S, Berger M, Volk B, Bauer J. The participation of interleukin-6, a stress-inducible cytokine, in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 1996;78:37–41. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00213-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Frei K, Fredrikson S, Fontana A, Link H. Interleukin-6 is elevated in plasma in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1991;31:147–53. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(91)90020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Muroi C, Hugelshofer M, Seule M, Tastan I, Fujioka M, Mishima K, et al. Correlation among systemic inflammatory parameter, occurrence of delayed neurological deficits, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:367–75. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828048ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Connolly ES, Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–37. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jimenez MC, Sun Q, Schurks M, Chiuve S, Hu FB, Manson JE, et al. Low dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke among women. Stroke. 2013;44:1784–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rupprecht R, Holsboer F. Neuroactive steroids: mechanisms of action and neuropsychopharmacological perspectives. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:410–6. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01399-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dong Y, Zheng P. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate: action and mechanism in the brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24:215–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Baulieu EE, Robel P. Non-genomic mechanisms of action of steroid hormones. Ciba Found Symp. 1995;191:24–37. doi: 10.1002/9780470514757.ch3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Webster JI, Tonelli L, Sternberg EM. Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:125–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.082401.104914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Marques-Deak A, Cizza G, Sternberg E. Brain-immune interactions and disease susceptibility. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10:239–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Straub RH, Lehle K, Herfarth H, Weber M, Falk W, Preuner J, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone in relation to other adrenal hormones during an acute inflammatory stressful disease state compared with chronic inflammatory disease: role of interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146:365–74. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1460365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Maingat FG, Polyak MJ, Paul AM, Vivithanaporn P, Noorbakhsh F, Ahboucha S, et al. Neurosteroid-mediated regulation of brain innate immunity in HIV/AIDS: DHEA-S suppresses neurovirulence. FASEB J. 2013;27:725–37. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-215079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sehba FA, Hou J, Pluta RM, Zhang JH. The importance of early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Prog Neurobiol. 2012;97:14–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Miller BA, Turan N, Chau M, Pradilla G. Inflammation, vasospasm, and brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:384342. doi: 10.1155/2014/384342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.LaCroix AZ, Yano K, Reed DM. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, incidence of myocardial infarction, and extent of atherosclerosis in men. Circulation. 1992;86:1529–35. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.86.5.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen J, Xu L, Huang C. DHEA inhibits vascular remodeling following arterial injury: a possible role in suppression of inflammation and oxidative stress derived from vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;388:75–84. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1900-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Khaw KT. Dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and cardiovascular disease. J Endocrinol. 1996;150:S149–53. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1500149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Porsova-Dutoit I, Sulcova J, Starka L. Do DHEA/DHEAS play a protective role in coronary heart disease? Physiol Res. 2000;49:S43–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rutkowski K, Sowa P, Rutkowska-Talipska J, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Rutkowski R. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): hypes and hopes. Drugs. 2014;74:1195–207. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES