Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2004 Jul;42(7):3142–3146. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3142-3146.2004

Geographic Variation in the Susceptibilities of Invasive Isolates of Candida glabrata to Seven Systemically Active Antifungal Agents: a Global Assessment from the ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance Program Conducted in 2001 and 2002

M A Pfaller 1,2,*, S A Messer 1, L Boyken 1, S Tendolkar 1, R J Hollis 1, D J Diekema 1,3
PMCID: PMC446248  PMID: 15243073

Abstract

We examined the susceptibilities to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin of 601 invasive isolates of Candida glabrata and grouped the isolates by geographic location: North America (331 isolates), Latin America (58 isolates), Europe (135 isolates), and Asia-Pacific (77 isolates). Caspofungin (MIC at which 90% of isolates tested are susceptible [MIC90], 0.12 μg/ml; 100% of strains are susceptible [S] at a MIC of ≤1 μg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml; 99.2% S) were the most active agents in all geographic regions. Fluconazole susceptibility was highest in the Asia-Pacific region (80.5% S, 3.9% resistant [R]) and lowest in North America (64% S, 10.3% R) and Latin America (62.1% S, 3.4% R). The extended-spectrum triazoles were most active in the Asia-Pacific region (90 to 96.1% S) and least active in North America (82.5 to 90.3% S). All 46 isolates that were resistant to fluconazole were susceptible to caspofungin (MIC90, 0.06 μg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml) and exhibited variable cross-resistance to posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole.


It is common practice in the literature to refer to species of Candida other than C. albicans as “non-albicansCandida spp. and suggest that this group of organisms exhibits decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and other azoles (1, 8, 14-16, 39, 41). Although the MICs of fluconazole for species such as C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. lusitaniae may be somewhat higher than those for C. albicans (MIC at which 90% of isolates tested are susceptible [MIC90], 2 to 4 μg/ml versus 0.5 μg/ml, respectively), they remain overwhelmingly susceptible (MIC ≤ 8 μg/ml; 96 to 99% susceptible [S]) to fluconazole (22-25, 27, 28). Likewise, although C. krusei may be intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, it is very susceptible to the new extended-spectrum triazoles such as voriconazole and posaconazole (98 to 99% S at a MIC of ≤1 μg/ml) (22, 23, 25, 28). C. glabrata alone, among the non-albicans Candida spp., is truly less susceptible to fluconazole (MIC90, 32 μg/ml; 57% S) and exhibits variable cross-resistance to the other triazoles (20, 22, 23, 25, 28). The extent of fluconazole resistance among bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates of C. glabrata has been shown to vary considerably throughout the United States (U.S.) (26). Although the frequency of C. glabrata as a cause of BSI has been shown to vary among different countries worldwide (5-7, 15, 22, 27), differences in the susceptibility of invasive (BSI, normally sterile sites, tissues, abscesses) isolates of C. glabrata to fluconazole and other systemically active agents among various geographic regions internationally have not been explored and compared directly.

In the present study we compare and contrast the in vitro activities of fluconazole and six systemically active antifungal agents, including voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, and caspofungin, against 601 recent clinically invasive isolates of C. glabrata. These isolates were obtained from 59 different study sites in 25 countries during the course of the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program conducted in 2001 and 2002.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Organisms.

A total of 3,997 clinical isolates of Candida spp. obtained from more than 60 medical centers in Europe, Latin America, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region were collected during the course of the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program in 2001 and 2002. The isolates represented consecutive incident isolates from patients with candidemia or other invasive forms of candidiasis (isolates from sterile-site infections, tissue biopsy specimens, abscesses, and joint fluid) cared for at ARTEMIS participating hospitals. Of the 3,997 isolates, 15% (601 isolates) were C. glabrata, including 331 isolates (20% of all Candida spp. submitted from North America) from 21 study sites in North America, 58 isolates (8% of total submitted) from 8 sites in Latin America, 135 isolates (14% of total submitted) from 19 sites in Europe, and 77 isolates (11% of total submitted) from 11 sites in the Asia-Pacific region. A total of 25 countries were represented in the collection.

All isolates were identified by Vitek and API products (bioMérieux, St. Louis, Mo.), supplemented by conventional methods as required (11), and were stored as water suspensions until they were used. Prior to testing, each isolate was passaged on potato dextrose agar (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) and CHROMagar (Hardy Laboratories, Santa Monica, Calif.) to ensure purity and viability.

Antifungal agents.

Standard antifungal powders of flucytosine (Sigma), fluconazole (Pfizer), voriconazole (Pfizer), posaconazole (Schering-Plough), ravuconazole (Bristol-Myers Squibb), and caspofungin (Merck) were obtained from their respective manufacturers. Stock solutions were prepared in water (caspofungin, fluconazole, and flucytosine), dimethyl sulfoxide (ravuconazole and voriconazole), or polyethyleneglycol (posaconazole). Serial twofold dilutions of each agent were prepared exactly as outlined in National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) document M27-A2 (18). Final dilutions were made in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (Sigma). Aliquots (0.1 ml) of drug solutions at 2× final concentration were dispensed into the wells of plastic microdilution trays using a Quick Spense II System (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, Va.). The trays were sealed and frozen at −70°C until they were used in the study.

Antifungal susceptibility studies.

Broth microdilution testing was performed in accordance with the guidelines in NCCLS document M27-A2 (18) by using the spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation, an inoculum concentration of (1.5 ± 1.0) × 103 cells/ml, and RPMI 1640 medium buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS. Yeast inocula (0.1 ml) were added to each well of the microdilution trays. The trays were incubated in air at 35°C, and MIC endpoints were read after 24 h for caspofungin (28a) and after 48 h of incubation for all other drugs. Susceptibility of isolates to amphotericin B was determined using Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) and RPMI 1640 agar with 2% glucose as described previously (21).

Following incubation, the broth microdilution wells were read with the aid of a reading mirror; the growth in each well was compared with that of the growth control (drug-free) well. The MICs of fluconazole, flucytosine, posaconazole, ravuconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin were defined as the lowest concentration that produced a prominent decrease in turbidity (approximately 50% reduction in growth) compared with that of the drug-free control (18; Pfaller et al., submitted for publication). Amphotericin B MICs determined by Etest were read after 48 h of incubation at 35°C and were determined to be at 100% inhibition of growth where the border of the elliptical inhibition zone intersected the scale on the strip edge (21). Quality control was ensured by testing the NCCLS-recommended strains, C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (18).

Interpretive criteria for fluconazole (S, ≤8 μg/ml; S-dose dependent, 16 to 32 μg/ml; R, ≥64 μg/ml) and flucytosine (S, ≤4 μg/ml; intermediate, 8 to 16 μg/ml; R, ≥32 μg/ml) were those published by Rex et al. (31) and the NCCLS (18). Interpretive criteria have not yet been defined for amphotericin B; however, because the study of Nguyen et al. (19) suggested that amphotericin B MICs of >1 μg/ml may indicate clinically resistant isolates of Candida spp., we determined the percentage of isolates inhibited by drugs at concentrations of ≤1 μg/ml to be susceptible in this study. Likewise, the new triazoles, voriconazole, ravuconazole, and posaconazole, and the echinocandin caspofungin have not been assigned interpretive breakpoints. For purposes of comparison and because pharmacokinetic data indicate that achievable levels in serum for these agents may exceed 1 to 2 μg/ml throughout the dosing interval (2-4, 37), we have employed a susceptibility breakpoint of ≤1 μg/ml for all four agents.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The overall susceptibility of the 601 isolates of C. glabrata to seven systemically active antifungal agents is shown in Table 1. Caspofungin (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml; 100% S at a MIC of ≤1 μg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml; 99.2% S) were the most-active agents and fluconazole (MIC90, 32 μg/ml; 66.2% S) was the least-active agent against these isolates. A total of 46 isolates (7.7%) exhibited high-level resistance (MIC, ≥64 μg/ml) to fluconazole.

TABLE 1.

In vitro susceptibilities of 601 clinical isolates of C. glabrata to seven antifungal agentsa

Antifungal agent MIC (μg/ml)b
% Sc No. of strains for which MIC (μg/ml) was:
50 90 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64
Amphotericin B 1 2 75.2 2 11 22 152 265 137 9 2 1
Flucytosine 0.06 0.12 99.2 382 204 7 1 1 1 3 2
Fluconazole 8 32 66.2 3 56 161 178 138 19 46
Posaconazole 0.5 2 85.4 1 12 74 234 192 58 12 4 14
Ravuconazole 0.25 1 90.7 3 51 121 206 112 52 23 21 11 1
Voriconazole 0.25 1 92.8 7 80 199 188 59 25 18 21 4
Caspofungind 0.03 0.06 100 377 182 30 14 3
a

All isolates tested by broth microdilution according to NCCLS M27-A2 guidelines (18) or by Etest (amphotericin B) as part of the Artemis Global Antifungal Surveillance Program conducted in 2001 and 2002.

b

50 and 90, MIC50 and MIC90, respectively.

c

Percentage of strains susceptible at MICs of ≤8 μg/ml (fluconazole), ≤4 μg/ml (flucytosine), or ≤1 μg/ml (all other agents).

d

Caspofungin MICs read as the lowest concentration at which prominent inhibition (∼50%) is observed at 24 h of incubation (Pfaller et al., submitted).

Among the new extended-spectrum triazoles, voriconazole was the most active (MIC90, 1 μg/ml; 92.8% S at a MIC of ≤ 1 μg/ml) and posaconazole was least active (MIC90, 2 μg/ml; 85.4% S at MIC ≤ 1 μg/ml). Amphotericin B MICs were ≤1 μg/ml for 75.2% of isolates, whereas MICs were greater than 2 μg/ml for 12 isolates (2% of total) as determined by the Etest method.

Fluconazole susceptibility was highest in the Asia-Pacific region (80.5%) and lowest in North America (64%) and Latin America (62.1%) (Table 2). Only 3.9% of isolates from the Asia-Pacific region were resistant to fluconazole, compared to 10.3% in North America. Likewise, the extended-spectrum triazoles were most active in the Asia-Pacific region (90 to 96.1% S) and least active in North America (82.5% to 90.3% S). Flucytosine and caspofungin were both very active against isolates from all regions, whereas amphotericin B was most active against isolates from North America (80.4% S) and least active against isolates from Latin America (63.8% S) and the Asia-Pacific region (64.9% S).

TABLE 2.

In vitro susceptibilities of 601 clinical isolates of C. glabrata to seven antifungal agents stratified by geographic locationa

Antifungal agent Locationb MIC (μg/ml)c
% Sd No. of strains for which MIC (μg/ml) was:
50 90 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64
Amphotericin B N. Am. 1 2 80.4 9 15 98 144 62 2 1
L. Am. 1 2 63.8 1 13 23 20 1
Eur. 1 2 73.3 2 1 3 27 66 30 5 1
A-Pac. 1 2 64.9 1 3 14 32 25 2
Flucytosine N. Am. 0.06 0.12 99.4 220 104 2 1 1 1 1 1
L. Am. 0.06 0.12 100 32 24 2
Eur. 0.06 0.12 98.5 87 45 1 1 1
A-Pac. 0.06 0.12 98.7 43 31 2 1
Fluconazole N. Am. 8 64 64.0 3 33 84 92 74 11 34
L. Am. 8 16 62.1 7 15 14 18 2 2
Eur. 8 16 65.2 12 40 36 36 4 7
A-Pac. 8 16 80.5 4 22 36 10 2 3
Posaconazole N. Am. 0.5 2 82.5 1 7 44 129 92 34 11 2 11
L. Am. 1 2 86.2 2 5 15 28 7 1
Eur. 0.5 2 88.9 3 18 55 44 12 1 1 1
A-Pac. 0.5 1 90.9 7 35 28 5 1 1
Ravuconazole N. Am. 0.25 2 87.3 27 69 107 56 30 17 14 10 1
L. Am. 0.25 1 94.8 1 4 11 18 15 6 2 1
Eur. 0.25 1 95.6 2 16 34 37 27 13 2 4
A-Pac. 0.25 1 93.5 4 7 44 14 3 2 2 1
Voriconazole N. Am. 0.25 1 90.3 1 45 106 104 28 15 14 14 4
L. Am. 0.25 0.5 96.6 2 7 17 18 8 4 2
Eur. 0.12 0.5 95.6 2 20 52 36 15 4 3 3
A-Pac. 0.25 0.5 96.1 2 8 24 30 8 2 1 2
Caspofungine N. Am. 0.03 0.06 100 191 111 22 5 2
L. Am. 0.03 0.06 100 41 16 1 5
Eur. 0.03 0.06 100 98 29 5 2 1
A-Pac. 0.03 0.06 100 47 26 2 2
a

All isolates tested by broth microdilution according to NCCLS M27 A2 guidelines (18) or by Etest (amphotericin B).

b

Abbreviations for locations: N. Am., North America (21 sites, 331 isolates); L. Am., Latin America (8 sites, 58 isolates); Eur., Europe (19 sites, 135 isolates); A-Pac., Asia-Pacific (11 sites, 77 isolates).

c

50 and 90, MIC50 and MIC90, respectively.

d

Percentage of strains susceptible at MICs of ≤8 μg/ml (fluconazole), ≤4 μg/ml (flucytosine), or ≤1 μg/ml (all other agents).

e

Caspofungin MICs read as the lowest concentration at which prominent inhibition (∼50%) is observed at 24 h of incubation (Pfaller et al., submitted).

Among the 46 isolates of C. glabrata that were resistant to fluconazole, all were very susceptible to both caspofungin (MIC90, 0.06 μg/ml; 100% S at a MIC of ≤0.25 μg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml; 100% S at a MIC of ≤0.25 μg/ml). In contrast, considerable cross-resistance was observed among the extended-spectrum triazoles: voriconazole (MIC90, 4 μg/ml; 13% S at a MIC of ≤1 μg/ml), posaconazole (MIC90, 16 μg/ml; 4% S at a MIC of ≤1 μg/ml), and ravuconazole (MIC90, 8 μg/ml; 8.7% S at a MIC of ≤1 μg/ml). All 46 of these isolates were resistant (MIC ≥ 1 μg/ml) to itraconazole as well as fluconazole (data not shown). Amphotericin B MICs were ≤1 μg/ml for 78.3% of these azole-resistant strains, and there were no isolates for which amphotericin B MICs exceeded 2 μg/ml.

There is no question that C. glabrata has emerged as an important, and potentially resistant, opportunistic fungal pathogen (9, 10, 26, 30, 35, 40). Trick et al. (40) have demonstrated that C. glabrata alone among Candida spp. has increased as a cause of BSI in U.S. intensive care units. Other studies have shown that in certain regions of the United States, C. glabrata both is a common cause of BSI and is also often resistant to fluconazole (26, 30, 35, 42).

The U.S. findings, however, may not be universal (15, 24, 27). Recent surveys from France (34), Italy (17, 38), Finland (29), Iceland (5), and Taiwan (6, 7) indicate that C. glabrata has not increased as a cause of BSI and other serious infections to the same extent as that seen in the United States, and furthermore, isolates from these countries may not be as resistant to fluconazole as isolates from the United States.

In the present study we have compared directly the activities of four major classes of antifungal agents (antimetabolites, azoles, echinocandins, and polyenes) against recent clinically invasive isolates of C. glabrata from four different geographic regions worldwide. We have confirmed that the azoles are less active against isolates of C. glabrata from North America than those from other regions and have shown that azoles have the greatest activity against isolates from the Asia-Pacific region. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that both a very old agent, flucytosine, and a very new agent, caspofungin, exhibit potent activity against virtually all isolates of C. glabrata irrespective of their geographic origin or azole susceptibility. Although one might expect that a novel, newly introduced agent such as caspofungin would be highly active, the excellent potency of flucytosine against C. glabrata is not widely appreciated (15, 36). Both of these agents may play an important role in optimizing therapy in regions where decreased susceptibility to azoles is common.

Although amphotericin B is generally recommended for primary therapy of serious infections due to C. glabrata (15, 32), it is slowly becoming apparent that this agent is not universally active against this species of Candida and that higher doses of amphotericin B (i.e., 1 mg/kg of body weight/day) may be required for optimal treatment (13, 14, 19, 32). The data presented in Tables 1 and 2 confirm these observations and also suggest that decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B may be more of an issue in some regions than others. Whereas amphotericin B MICs in excess of 2 μg/ml were observed in less than 1% of North America isolates, this phenotype was seen in 4.4% of European isolates (Table 2).

The new triazoles have been shown to have good activity against some, but not all, fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. (12, 20, 25, 33). Voriconazole MICs of 1 μg/ml or less have been reported for most fluconazole-resistant strains of C. albicans (25, 33) and for essentially all strains of C. krusei (12, 25). It has also been suggested that the new triazoles may be active against strains of C. glabrata that are resistant to fluconazole (12). Although it is true that C. glabrata isolates for which fluconazole MICs are 16 to 32 μg/ml (susceptible-dose dependent) appear susceptible to voriconazole and the other new triazoles (87 to 97% S at MIC ≤ 1 μg/ml), MICs are usually ≥4 μg/ml for those strains resistant to fluconazole (25, 28). This cross-resistance is readily apparent in the data presented in Table 3. The clinical significance of these in vitro data, however, has yet to be determined.

TABLE 3.

In vitro susceptibilities of 46 fluconazole- and itraconazole-resistant isolates of C. glabrata to six antifungal agentsa

Antifungal agent No. of strains for which MIC (μg/ml) was:
0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64
Amphotericin B 1 16 19 10
Flucytosine 21 24 1
Posaconazole 1 1 18 8 4 14
Ravuconazole 1 3 10 21 10 1
Voriconazole 1 5 16 20 4
Caspofunginb 22 21 2 1
a

All isolates tested by NCCLS M27-A2 broth microdilution methods (18) or by Etest (amphotericin B). Fluconazole (MIC ≥ 64 μg/ml) and itraconazole (MIC ≥1 μg/ml) resistance defined according to NCCLS M27-A2 guidelines (18).

b

Caspofungin MICs read as the lowest concentration at which prominent inhibition (∼50%) is observed at 24 h of incubation (Pfaller et al., submitted).

In summary we have provided a global comparison of the in vitro activities of seven systemically active antifungal agents, comprising four different classes, against clinically significant isolates of C. glabrata. This information documents the geographic variation in azole activity on a global scale and demonstrates the universal activity of flucytosine and caspofungin against this species. This information should be useful in optimizing therapy of infections due to C. glabrata and will also serve as a baseline for future studies regarding the emergence of antifungal resistance in this species.

Acknowledgments

Linda Elliott and Shanna Duffy provided excellent support in the preparation of the manuscript. We express our appreciation to ARTEMIS program participants. For a complete listing of the ARTEMIS participants please go to http://www.medicine.uiowa.edu/pathology/path_folder/research/acknowledgments/artemis_participants.pdf.

The ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program was supported in part by research grants from Pfizer and Schering Plough.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abi Said, D., and E. Anaissie. 1998. Epidemiology of non-albicans Candida spp. Baillieres Clin. Infect. Dis. 7:1131-1133. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andes, D. 2003. In vivo pharmacodynamics of antifungal drugs in treatment of candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1179-1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andes, D., K. Marchillo, T. Stamstad, and R. Conklin. 2003. In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, voriconazole, in a murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3165-3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Andes, D., K. Marchillo, T. Stamstad, and R. Conklin. 2003. In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, ravuconazole, in a murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1193-1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Asmundsdottir, L. R., H. Erlendsdottir, and M. Gottfredsson. 2002. Increasing incidence of candidemia: results from a 20-year nationwide study in Iceland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3489-3492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen, Y.-C., S.-C. Chang, K.-T. Luh, and W.-C. Hsieh. 2003. Stable susceptibility of Candida blood isolates to fluconazole despite increasing use during the past 10 years. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:71-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheng, M.-F., K.-W. Yu, R.-B. Tang, Y.-H. Fan, Y.-L. Yang, K.-S. Hsieh, M. Ho, and H.-J. Lo. 2004. Distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species causing candidemia from 1996 to 1999. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48:33-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Collin, B., C. J. Clancy, and M. H. Nguyen. 1999. Antifungal resistance in non-albicans Candida species. Drug Resist. Update 2:9-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fidel, P. L., Jr., J. A. Vazquez, and J. D. Sobel. 1999. Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:80-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gumbo, T., C. M. Isada, G. Hall, M. T. Karafa, and S. M. Gordon. 1999. Candida glabrata fungemia: clinical features of 139 patients. Medicine 78:220-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hazen, K. C., and S. A. Howell. 2003. Candida, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medical importance, p. 1693-1711. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 12.Johnson, L. B., and C. A. Kauffman. 2003. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:630-637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krcmery, V. Jr. 1997. Breakthrough fungemia during therapy with amphotericin B. Chemotherapy 42:139-140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krcmery, V. Jr., E. Oracova, S. Spanik, M. Mrazova-Studena, J. Trupl, A. Kunova, K. Stopkova-Grey, E. Kukuckova, A. Demitrovicova, and K. Kralovicova. 1998. Nosocomial breakthrough fungemia during antifungal prophylaxis or empirical antifungal therapy in 41 cancer patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy: analysis of etiology, risk factors, and outcome. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41:373-380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Krcmery, V., and A. J. Barnes. 2002. Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J. Hosp. Infect. 50:243-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kunova, A., J. Trupl, S. Spanik, L. Drgona, J. Sufliarsky, J. Lacka, V. Studen, E. Hlavacova, M. Studena, and E. Kukuckova. 1995. Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, non-albicans Candida spp., and other fungal organisms in a sixty-bed national cancer center in 1989-1993: no association with the use of fluconazole. Chemotherapy 41:39-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luzzati, R., G. Amalfitano, L. Lazzarini, F. Soldoni, S. Bellino, M. Solbiati, M. C. Danzi, S. Vento, G. Todeschini, C. Vivenza, and E. Concia. 2000. Nosocomial candidemia in non-neutropenic patients at an Italian tertiary care hospital. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:602-607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A2, 2nd ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 19.Nguyen, M. H., C. J. Clancy, V. L. Yu, Y. C. Yu, A. J. Morris, D. R. Snydman, D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1998. Do in vitro susceptibility data predict the microbiologic response to amphotericin B? Results of prospective study of patients with Candida fungemia. J. Infect. Dis. 177:425-430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., J. H. Rex, P. G. Pappas, R. J. Hamill, R. A. Larsen, H. W. Horowitz, W. G. Powderly, N. Hyslop. C. A. Kauffman, J. Cleary, J. E. Mangino, and J. Lee. 2003. Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3149-3154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, and A. Bolmström. 1998. Evaluation of Etest for determining in vitro susceptibility of yeast isolates to amphotericin B. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 32:223-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, R. N. Jones, H. S. Sader, A. C. Fluit, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, and the SENTRY Participant Group. 2001. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: Frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3254-3259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, and R. N. Jones. 2001. In vitro activities of posaconazole (Sch 56592) compared with those of itraconazole and fluconazole against 3,685 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2862-2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pfaller, M. A., and D. J. Diekema. 2002. Role of sentinel surveillance of candidemia: Trends in species distribution and antifungal susceptibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3551-3557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, and D. J. Diekema. 2002. In vitro activities of ravuconazole and voriconazole compared with those of four approved systemic antifungal agents against 6,970 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1723-1727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2003. Variation in susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata to fluconazole according to patient age and geographic location. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2176-2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pfaller, M. A., and D. J. Diekema. 2004. 12-years of fluconazole in clinical practice: global trends in species distribution and fluconazole susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10(Suppl. 1):11-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2004. In vitro activities of voriconazole, posaconazole, and fluconazole against 4,169 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans collected during 2001 and 2002 in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48:201-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28a.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2004. Further standardization of broth microdilution methodology for in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida species by use of an international collection of more than 3,000 clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3117-3119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Poikonen, E., O. Lyytikäinen, A. Veli-Jukka, and P. Ruutu. 2003. Candidemia in Finland, 1995-1999. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:985-990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Redding, S. W., W. K. Kirkpatrick, S. Saville, B. J. Coco, W. White, A. Fothergill, M. Rinaldi, T. Eng, T. F. Patterson, and J. Lopez-Ribot. 2003. Multiple patterns of resistance to fluconazole in Candida glabrata isolates from a patient with oropharyngeal candidiasis receiving head and neck radiation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:619-622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Lancaster, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, T. J. Walsh, and A. L. Barry for the subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and Candida infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:235-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rex, J. H., T. J. Walsh, J. D. Sobel, S. G. Filler, P. G. Pappas, W. E. Dismukes, and J. E. Edwards. 2000. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:662-678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rhunke, M., A. Schmidt-Westhausen, and M. Trautman. 1997. In vitro activities of voriconazole (UK-109,496) against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Candida albicans isolates from oral cavities of patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:575-577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Richet H., P. Roux, C. Des Champs, Y. Esnault, A. Andremont, and the French Candidemia Study Group. 2002. Candidemia in French hospitals: incidence rates and characteristics. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8:405-412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Safdar, A., V. Chaturvedi, B. S. Knoll, D. H. Larone, D. S. Perlin, and D. Armstrong. 2002. Prospective, multicenter surveillance study of Candida glabrata: Fluconazole and itraconazole susceptibility profiles in bloodstream, invasive, and colonizing strains and differences between isolates from three urban teaching hospitals in New York City (Candida Susceptibility Trends Study, 1998 to 1999). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3268-3272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sanglard, D., and F. C. Odds. 2002. Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: Molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:73-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sheehan, D. J., C. A. Hitchcock, and C. M. Sibley. 1999. Current and emerging azole antifungal agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:40-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tortorano, A. M., E. Biraghi, A. Astolfi, C. Ossi, M. Tejada, C. Farina, S. Perin, C. Bonnanccorso, C. Cavanna, A. Raballo, A. Grossi, and the FIMUA Candidemia Study Group. 2002. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) prospective survey of candidemia: report from one Italian region. J. Hosp. Infect. 51:297-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tortorano, A. M., A. L. Rigoni, E. Biraghi, A. Prigitano, M. A. Viviani, and the FIMUA-FCMM Candidaemia Study Group. 2003. The European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) survey of candidaemia in Italy: antifungal susceptibility patterns of 261 non-albicans Candida isolates from blood. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:679-682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Trick, W. E., S. K. Fridkin, J. R. Edwards, R. A. Hajjeh, R. P. Gaynes, and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Hospitals. 2002. Secular trends of hospital-acquired candidemia among intensive care unit patients in the United States during 1989-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:627-630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van't Wout, J. W. 1996. Fluconazole treatment of candidal infections caused by non-albicans Candida species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:238-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wingard, J. R., W. G. Merz, M. G. Rinaldi, C. B. Miller, J. E. Karp, and R. Saral. 1993. Association of Torulopsis glabrata infections with fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic bone marrow transplant patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1847-1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES