Skip to main content
Current Oncology logoLink to Current Oncology
. 2015 Jun;22(3):e142–e147. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2323

Quality of life of nasopharyngeal cancer survivors in China

JS Hong *,, J Tian ‡,, QF Han *,, QY Ni
PMCID: PMC4462535  PMID: 26089724

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed the quality of life (qol) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (npc) survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years in Fujian, China, and we analyzed factors influencing qol.

Methods

We calculated the prevalence of psychological distress and radiotherapy (rt)–induced symptoms in 216 npc survivors who participated in a cross-sectional survey. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (version 3.0) was used to assess the qol of npc survivors. Multiple linear regression was applied to analyze the factors influencing qol.

Results

The prevalence rates of rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems were 11.58% (95% ci: 7.21% to 15.58%) for difficulty in swallowing, 17.59% (95% ci: 12.51% to 22.67%) for mouth dryness or sores, 13.89% (95% ci: 9.28% to 18.50%) for nasal dryness or congestion, 18.52% (95% ci: 13.34% to 23.70%) for fatigue, 11.11% (95% ci: 6.92% to 15.30%) for frequent dizziness, 18.06% (95% ci: 12.93% to 23.19%) for decline in hearing, 14.81% (95% ci: 10.07% to 19.55%) for poor sleep quality, 18.52% (95% ci: 13.34% to 23.70%) for worry about disease recurrence, 18.98% (95% ci: 13.75% to 24.21%) for anxiety, and 25.00% (95% ci: 19.23% to 30.77%) for depression. Mean survival times were 4.32 ± 2.63 years in patients with mouth dryness or sores, 4.26 ± 2.90 years in patients with fatigue, and 5.60 ± 2.94 years in patients with a decline in hearing. The mean global qol score was 74.21 (95% ci: 72.22 to 76.20). At a significance level of α = 0.05, the factors influencing qol were age (p = 0.032), education level (p = 0.001), anxiety score (p < 0.001), depression score (p < 0.001), mouth dryness or sores (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.027), and disease stage (p = 0.044).

Conclusions

The prevalence rates of mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, decline in hearing, depression, and anxiety were high in npc survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years. These rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems can last for many years after rt. The qol of the npc survivors was good. Factors influencing qol were age, education level, anxiety, depression, mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, and disease stage. Our results suggest that during clinical treatment, doctors should minimize the radiation dose to the ears of patients. In addition, our results emphasize the importance of providing oral and ear nursing and psychological care to npc survivors.

Keywords: Nasopharyngeal cancer, quality of life, depression, anxiety, side effects

INTRODUCTION

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (npc) is a common cancer in southern China and accounts for 1.58% of new cancer cases yearly1. Fujian Province has a high incidence of npc; the reported crude incidence of npc ranged from 15 to 30 per 100,000 during 2003–20072. Improvements in diagnosis and treatment have greatly increased the survival rate for npc patients3,4, and the 5-year rate is about 70% in Fujian4,5. The 5-year survival rate for patients with early-stage npc is as high as 93%–100%6. The number of long-term npc survivors is increasing significantly and gradually forming a large special population7. Thus, well-being and improvement in quality of life (qol) for this population are important concerns in cancer nursing and health care.

Quality of life and its assessment have become increasingly important in health care, especially in the field of chronic and terminal diseases. Conventionally, medical care for cancer patients has focused on the survival rate. However, survival rate assessments provide no knowledge and understanding of the patient’s mental and emotional well-being. Evaluations of treatment effect in chronic diseases have therefore been changed to depend not only on survival duration, but also on patient qol8. An individual’s qol encompasses personal feelings in the domains of physiology, psychology, and society9. The qol of cancer patients reflects not only treatment effect, but also rehabilitation effect10. Few studies have reported the qol of npc survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years. The qol in this population should not be ignored, because npc affects young people, and npc survivors can have problems with swallowing, speech, and hearing, as well as psychological effects from loss of function.

The primary treatment for npc is radiotherapy (rt)11. Given that such tumours are located in close proximity to the base of the skull, most of the important vital structures in that area—such as the optic nerves, optic chiasma, brain, ears, and major salivary glands—are included within or in close proximity to the rt field. Radiotherapy produces many side effects: xerostomia, trismus, swallowing difficulties, neck stiffness, hearing problems, and neuroendocrine dysfunction. Some symptoms can last a long time after treatment12 and can lead to deterioration in a survivor’s qol7.

The cross-sectional survey in the present study set out to describe qol in npc survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years in Fujian, China. The prevalence rates of anxiety, depression, and some treatment-related symptoms among npc survivors were estimated. The factors influencing qol in this cohort were also analyzed.

METHODS

Participants

The study subjects were npc survivors in the communities of Fuzhou who were surveyed between June 2011 and December 2013. Subjects were included if they had been diagnosed with npc and had completed cancer treatment more than 2 years earlier, if they had no history of mental or psychological disease, if they were between 18 and 70 years of age, and if they were knowledgeable about their cancer diagnosis. Subjects with tumour metastasis or recurrence were excluded.

All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the relevant institutional review boards for human research of Fujian Medical University.

Measures

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (qlq-C30, version 3.0) is used to determine qol in cancer patients13. This thirty-item questionnaire includes twenty-eight items scored 1–4, and two items scored 1–7. The Chinese version of the questionnaire has been confirmed to be suitable for Chinese cancer patients13. In the present study, the sum of the scores for items 1–5 and items 8–19 represented the physical aspect of qol (qol-Physical); the sum of the scores for items 20–25 represented the mental aspect of qol (qol-Mental); and the sum of the scores for items 6, 7, 26, and 27 represented the social aspect of qol (qol-Social). All scores were transformed into values in the 0–100 range. A high total score indicates good qol.

The anxiety and depression of participants were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (hads)14. The hads is a 14-item questionnaire (7 items each in the Anxiety and Depression subscales). Participants scored each item from 0 to 3 based on their current situation. The total scores for the Anxiety and Depression sub-scales, which range from 0 to 21, are classified as follows: 0–7, asymptomatic; 8–10, suspicious symptoms; and 11–21, definite symptoms14. The Chinese version of the hads has been confirmed to be suitable for Chinese patients15. In the present study, patients with Depression and Anxiety subscale scores exceeding 11 were considered depressed and anxious.

In addition to completing the qol and hads, each participant was also investigated for certain symptoms and psychological problems arising from treatment—namely, difficulty swallowing, mouth dryness or sores, nasal dryness or congestion, fatigue, frequent dizziness, decline in hearing, poor sleep quality, and frequent worry about disease recurrence.

Statistical Analysis

The levels of anxiety, depression, and 8 side effects or problems arising from treatment measured in npc survivors are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (cis). Means with standard deviations and 95% cis are used to describe the qol of the npc survivors. Multiple linear regression was applied to analyze factors influencing qol. The significance level was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 216 npc survivors eligible for the study, 150 were men (69.44%), and 66 (30.55%) were women. Mean age of the survivors was 47.81 ± 10.75 years. The proportions of participants with low, middle, and high levels of education were 19.44%, 62.03%, and 18.52% respectively. The proportions of participants with disease stages i, ii, iii, and iv were 1.85%, 11.11%, 58.33%, and 28.70% respectively. Mean survival time for the participants was 4.39 ± 2.69 years (range: 2–10 years). The proportions of participants with 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival durations were 43.06%, 14.35%, 9.72%, and 32.87% respectively.

Most of the survivors (163, 75.46%) received intensity-modulated rt; the remaining 53 survivors (24.54%) received conventional rt. The rt was delivered using an electron linear accelerator and was prescribed as 66–78 Gy in 30–39 fractions over 6–7.4 weeks. Of the 216 survivors, 211 (97.68%) also received chemotherapy, with 138 (65.40%) receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy, and 73 (34.60%) receiving induction chemotherapy sequenced with rt. In 32 survivors (14.81%) treatment breaks were required because of acute grade ii or iii oral mucositis.

Table i shows the prevalence rates of anxiety, depression, and problems arising from treatment among these 216 npc survivors with a survival time of more than 2 years. The prevalences of depression and anxiety were high (25% for depression and 18.98% for anxiety). Disease recurrence was a frequent worry for 18.52% of the survivors. The prevalence rates of the rt-induced side effects of mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, and decline in hearing remained high, even though the survivors had ended rt more than 2 years earlier. Table ii shows the mean survival durations in participants with and without rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems. Except for difficulty in swallowing and decline in hearing, the differences in mean survival duration between the two groups were not statistically significant. That finding suggests that rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems can last for many years after rt.

TABLE I.

Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and symptoms and psychological problems arising from the side effects of treatment in 216 nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors

Symptom or problem Affected Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%)

No Yes
Difficulty swallowing 191 25 11.58 7.31 to 15.58
Mouth dryness or sores 178 38 17.59 12.51 to 22.67
Nasal dryness or congestion 186 30 13.89 9.28 to 18.50
Fatigue 176 40 18.52 13.34 to 23.70
Frequent dizziness 192 24 11.11 6.92 to 15.30
Decline in hearing 177 39 18.06 12.93 to 23.19
Poor sleep quality 184 32 14.81 10.07 to 19.55
Often worried about recurrence 176 40 18.52 13.34 to 23.70
Anxiety 175 41 18.98 13.75 to 24.21
Depression 162 54 25.00 19.23 to 30.77

CI = confidence interval.

TABLE II.

Mean survival among nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with and without anxiety, depression, and symptoms and psychological problems arising from the side effects of treatment

Symptom or problem Survival (years) p Valuea

Affected Not affected
Difficulty in swallowing 5.62±3.23 4.28±2.61 0.042
Mouth dryness or sores 5.51±3.40 4.32±2.63 0.124
Nasal dryness or congestion 4.50±3.09 4.30±2.61 0.194
Fatigue 4.42±2.65 4.26±2.90 0.723
Frequent dizziness 4.36±2.61 4.63±3.24 0.641
Decline in hearing 4.14±2.56 5.60±2.94 0.002
Poor sleep quality 4.35±2.68 4.62±2.75 0.610
Often worried about recurrence 4.40±2.67 4.37±2.81 0.957
Anxiety 4.25±2.61 5.01±2.94 0.099
Depression 4.33±2.67 4.58±2.75 0.541
a

By 2-sample t-test.

Table iii shows mean scores, with 95% cis, for survivor qol. The mean score for global qol was 74.21 (95% ci: 72.22 to 76.20). Of the three functional scales, qol-Social showed the highest scores (mean: 78.32; 95% ci: 75.93 to 80.71), and qol-Physical showed the lowest scores (mean: 72.36; 95% ci: 71.36 to 73.36). Compared with the highest possible qol score of 100, the mean qol score of 74.21 was high, which suggests that the qol of our npc survivors was good.

TABLE III.

Mean scores for global quality-of-life (QOL) and QOL sub-scales in 216 nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors

Variable Range Mean±SD 95% CI
Global QOL 27.50–99.11 74.21±14.92 72.22 to 76.20
QOL–Physical 47.06–82.35 72.36±7.49 71.36 to 73.36
QOL–Mental 37.50–87.50 74.22±9.78 72.92 to 75.52
QOL–Social 25.00–100.00 78.32±17.95 75.93 to 80.71

SD = standard deviation; CI = confidence interval.

Table iv shows the frequency distributions for the global qol score and the qol-Physical and -Social scores. The mean global qol scores for participants with 2-, 3, 4-, and 5-year survival durations were 76.40 (95% ci: 73.66 to 79.14), 72.17 (95% ci: 65.97 to 78.36), 75.61 (95% ci: 70.32 to 80.90), and 71.83 (95% ci: 68.12 to 75.54) respectively. The differences in mean global qol score for the survivors with 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival durations were not statistically significant (p = 0.206). In addition, the correlation coefficient between years of survival and qol score was not statistically significant (r = 0.081, p = 0.236). Those findings suggest that the qol of npc survivors did not improve with greater survival duration.

TABLE IV.

Frequency distributions of scores for global quality-of-life (QOL) and QOL subscales in 216 nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors

Score group Quality-of-life domain

Global Physical Mental Social




(n) (%) (n) (%) (n) (%) (n) (%)
<40 1 0.46 1 0.46 2 0.93 4 1.85
40–49 12 5.56 2 0.93 3 1.39 8 3.70
50–59 26 12.04 12 5.56 15 6.94 21 9.72
60–69 45 20.83 50 23.15 36 16.67 31 14.35
70–79 51 23.61 122 56.48 105 48.61 46 21.30
≥80 81 37.50 29 13.42 55 25.46 106 49.07

Stepwise regression was used to detect factors influencing the global qol of our npc survivors. The factors analyzed in the regression model were age, sex, education level (low, medium, high), disease stage, depression, anxiety, difficulty in swallowing (no, yes), mouth dryness or sores (no, yes), nasal dryness or congestion (no, yes), fatigue (no, yes), frequent dizziness (no, yes), decline in hearing (no, yes), poor sleep quality (no, yes), and frequent worry about disease (no, yes). Table v shows the results.

TABLE V.

Stepwise regression of factors associated with quality of life (dependent variable: global quality-of-life score)

Factor β SE t p Value
Age −1.096 0.508 2.157 0.032
Education level 7.237 2.162 3.348 0.001
Anxiety −1.623 0.190 8.559 0.000
Depression −0.777 0.191 4.075 0.000
Mouth dryness or sores −6.140 1.655 3.710 0.000
Fatigue −3.124 1.399 −2.233 0.027
Disease stage −1.628 0.802 2.030 0.044

SE = standard error.

At a significance level of α = 0.05, the factors influencing qol were age (p = 0.032), education level (p = 0.001), Anxiety score (p < 0.001), Depression score (p < 0.001), mouth dryness or sores (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.027), and disease stage (p = 0.044). The linear regression model containing those seven factors explained 70.10% of the variation in global qol (adjusted R2 = 0.701). The results suggest that younger npc survivors had worse qol than older survivors, that npc survivors with higher education levels had better qol than those with a low education level, and that disease stage was negatively correlated with qol (Table v). The results also suggest that rt-induced symptoms (including mouth dryness or sores and fatigue) and psychological problems (including anxiety and depression) affect qol (Table v).

DISCUSSION

With the emergence of new treatment techniques, npc patients have a better chance to live cancer-free for an extended period of time. However, some rt-induced side effects are chronic and progressive16,17, and those sequelae can lower qol in survivors7. Understanding patient perspectives about qol and exploring the factors related to qol are helpful not only for clinicians making treatment decisions, but also for health workers attempting to provide npc survivors with adequate health services in their communities.

Mouth dryness, mouth sores, and decline in hearing are common side effects in npc patients who receive rt. Previous studies have suggested that those side effects can be sustained for many years after the end of rt18,19. In a study of 336 npc survivors (survival duration: 5–38 years), researchers reported that 23.51% had serious mouth dryness, 10.71% had mouth sores, and 28.87% experienced a serious decline in hearing18. Wu et al.7 reported that prevalence rates of serious decline in hearing and difficulty in swallowing were 51.67% and 52.38% respectively in 192 npc survivors (survival duration: 2–5 years). Fang et al.19 also reported that the prevalence rates of difficulty in swallowing and decline in hearing were 55.56% and 55.43% respectively in npc survivors with a survival duration of 2 or more years. In our study, the prevalence rates of mouth dryness or sores, difficulty in swallowing, and decline in hearing were 17.59%, 11.58%, and 18.06% respectively. Our results could not be compared with those from previous reports because the methods used to assess symptoms in those studies differed from ours. However, our results confirm that rt-induced mouth dryness or sores and decline in hearing were the main symptoms in npc survivors, which accords with the previous reports. Based on the mean survival time shown in Table ii, those symptoms can last for many years after rt.

During treatment, doctors should minimize the radiation dose to organs at risk (especially the ears) of patients, and community health care workers should provide oral and ear care to npc survivors. During clinical treatment, the dose constraints for normal tissue should be fully considered, and newer rt techniques such as intensity-modulated rt, which, compared with conventional rt, can provide better clinical outcomes and sparing of organs at risk, should be used for npc patients if possible20. In 1991, Emami et al.21 recommended partial organ tolerance doses, which were useful in designing treatment plans, although the recommended doses had some uncertainties and limitations. Today, quantitative correlates of dose–volume with clinical outcome can obtained because of the use of three-dimensional treatment planning. The quantec (quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in clinic) articles2225 summarized studies since the early 1990s and updated the information provided by Emami et al. The dose–volume limits of major organs at risk during treatment for npc as recommended by quantec are these:

  • □ A 5%–10% risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis is predicted to occur at 72 Gy and 90 Gy in 2-Gy fractions22.

  • □ The incidence of radiation-induced optic neuropathy was unusual for a maximum dose of less than 55 Gy, particularly for fraction sizes below 2 Gy23.

  • □ To minimize the risk for sensorineural hearing loss, the mean dose to the cochlea should be limited to 45 Gy or less—or more conservatively, to 35 Gy or less with concurrent cisplatin and rt24.

  • □ Severe xerostomia can usually be avoided if at least 1 parotid gland has been spared to a mean dose of less than 20 Gy or if both glands have been spared to a mean dose of 25 Gy25.

Anxiety and depression are the psychological problems most commonly seen in cancer patients2628. The reported prevalence of anxiety and depression in cancer patients ranges from 25% to 54%26,29. A study using the hads showed that 51.2% of npc patients are anxious and that 44.2% are depressed30. In a study using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale, researchers reported that the prevalence rates of anxiety and depression in 46 npc survivors (mean survival duration: 5.7 ± 3.1 years) were 82.6% and 78.3% respectively31. Those studies indicated that psychological disorders, such as depression and anxiety, are apparent as early as the start of rt and can last long after rt31,32. Our study also suggested that anxiety and depression can continue for many years after rt. Psychological problems in cancer survivors should not be ignored, because depression and anxiety can influence cancer survival33,34 and qol35. Data from several studies indicate that poor psychological status can influence a patient’s immune status and illness duration36,37 and that untreated depression can result in significant morbidity and mortality38. Close attention and psychological care should therefore be given to patients not only during the period of rt but also during follow-up.

Fatigue is a common and frequently disabling symptom in cancer survivors39 that can last for a long time after treatment in some cancer survivors40. Fatigue affects the ability to perform daily activities41, increases anxiety and depression42, and lowers qol in cancer patients43. The prevalence of fatigue in npc survivors is rarely reported. In a study of head-and-neck cancer survivors, researchers reported a 10% prevalence of fatigue44. In our study, the prevalence of self-reported fatigue in npc survivors was 18.52%. The higher prevalence of fatigue in our study might be a result of the method used to assess fatigue. The participants might lack the ability to distinguish fatigue from depression. Fatigue and depression are both heterogeneous constructs with physical, cognitive, and emotional dimensions and a high degree of overlap across the dimensions45. Further studies with a special scale are needed to measure fatigue.

In the present study, the mean score for global qol was 74.21 (range: 27.50–99.11). Compared with the highest possible qol of 100, we believe that 74.21 is not low. A high mean qol score could suggest that npc survivors in Fujian experience good qol. Several studies have reported qol in npc survivors7,19,30,31,46,47. Among those studies, only the one by Cengiz et al.47 used the qlq-C30 version 3.0, the same scale used in our study, to measure qol. In the Cengiz study, the mean global qol score for 187 npc survivors with a survival duration of 0.5–24 years was 73.0 (range: 8.3–100.0), a result very similar to ours.

The limitations of our study must be mentioned. Our study used a cross-sectional design. The prevalence of anxiety and depression—and the qlq-C30 score—described the psychological status and qol of the npc survivors at only one time point. A more methodologically sound approach would be to use a longitudinal design in which the same individuals are assessed repeatedly at various time points. The pattern of change in qol with the passage of time can best be evaluated in longitudinal studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence rates of mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, decline in hearing, depression, and anxiety were high in our cohort of npc survivors with a survival duration of more than 2 years. Those rt-induced symptoms and psychological problems can last for many years after rt. The qol of the npc survivors was good. The factors influencing qol were age, education level, anxiety, depression, mouth dryness or sores, fatigue, and disease stage. Our results suggest that, during clinical treatment, doctors should minimize the radiation dose to the ears of patients. Our results also emphasize the importance of providing oral and ear nursing and psychological care to npc survivors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare that we have none. This study had no financial relationship with any sponsoring organization. The corresponding author has full control of all primary data and will allow a data review if requested.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Zhang SW, Chen WQ, Kong LZ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of malignant tumors during 1998–2002 in China [Chinese] China Cancer. 2010;19:356–65. [issn: 1004-0242] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deng W, Huang TR, Cheng WQ, Zhang SW, Zheng RS, Li JL. Analysis of the incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China between 2003 and 2007. Tumor. 2012;32:189–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ou SH, Zell JA, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the United States: improved survival of Chinese patients within the keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma histology. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:29–35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jian-ji P, Yu Z, Shao-jun L, Ling Y, et al. Long-term results of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy: 1706 cases report [Chinese] Chinese J Radiat Oncol. 2008;17:247–51. [issn: 1004-4221] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cai C, Zhang W, Chen X, Chen J, Liu F, Hong J. Effects of radical conventional radiotherapy on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 335 patients in a single institute [Chinese] J Fujian Medical University. 2009;43:397–400. [issn: 1672-4194] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shu SF, Zao C, Chen CY, et al. Long-term results of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone [Chinese] Chinese J Radiat Oncol. 2011;20:1–4. [issn: 1004-4221] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu Y, Hu WH, Xia YF, Ma J, Liu MZ, Cui NJ. Quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors in Mainland China. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:65–74. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9113-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bottomley A. The cancer patient and quality of life. Oncologist. 2002;7:120–5. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.7-2-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mellette SJ. Cancer rehabilitation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:781–4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.10.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maguire P, Selby P. Assessing quality of life in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1989;60:437–40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (caca) The status and progress of radiotherapy technology [Web page, Chinese] Tianjin, PRC: CACA; 13-01-2011. [Available at: http://www.caca.org.cn/system/2011/01/12/010067142.shtml; cited: 14 April 2015] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Berkey FJ. Managing the adverse effects of radiation therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:381–8. 394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhen LC, Tian HR, Xie PZ. Medical Quality of Survival Evaluation [Chinese] Beijing, PRC: Junshi Yixue Kexue Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leung CM, Ho S, Kan CS, Hung CH, Chen CN. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Across-cultural perspective. Int J Psychsom. 1993;40:29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Delanian S, Lefaix JL, Pradat PF. Radiation-induced neuropathy in cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Polomano RC, Farrar JT. Pain and neuropathy in cancer survivors. Surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy can cause pain; research could improve its detection and treatment. Am J Nurs. 2006;106(suppl):39–47. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200603003-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kong L, Zhang YW, Wu YR, Guo XM. Late side reactions of long-term survivors after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma [Chinese] Chinese J Radiat Oncol. 2006;15:153–6. [issn: 1004-4221] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fang FM, Chiu HC, Kuo WR, et al. Health-related quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cancer-free survival after treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:959–68. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02838-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:286–93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:109–122. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lawrence YR, Li XA, el Naqa I, et al. Radiation dose–volume effects in the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(suppl):S20–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mayo C, Martel MK, Marks LB, Flickinger J, Nam J, Kirkpatrick J. Radiation dose–volume effects of optic nerves and chiasm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(suppl):S28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bhandare N, Jackson A, Eisbruch A, et al. Radiation therapy and hearing loss. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(suppl):S50–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deasy JO, Moiseenko V, Marks L, Chao KS, Nam J, Eisbruch A. Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(suppl):S58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chapman CR. Psychological and behavioral aspects of cancer pain. In: Bonica JJ, Liebeskind JC, Albe-Fessard DG, Jones LE, editors. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Vol. 3. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1979. pp. 45–56. Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Pain. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takahashi T, Hondo M, Nishimura K, et al. Evaluation of quality of life and psychological response in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiat Med. 2008;26:396–401. doi: 10.1007/s11604-008-0248-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.So WK, Marsh G, Ling WM, et al. Anxiety, depression and quality of life among Chinese breast cancer patients during adjuvant therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10:19–28. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1&#x0003c;19::AID-PON501&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lue BH, Huang TS, Chen HJ. Physical distress, emotional status, and quality of life in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer complicated by post-radiotherapy endocrinopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tang Y, Luo D, Rong X, Shi X, Peng Y. Psychological disorders, cognitive dysfunction and quality of life in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with radiation-induced brain injury. PloS One. 2012;7:e36529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karasawa K, Horikawa N, Kawase E, et al. Assessment of psychological responses in patients about to receive radiotherapy. Radiat Med. 2005;23:478–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gramignano G, Lusso MR, Madeddu C, et al. Efficacy of l-carnitine administration on fatigue, nutritional status, oxidative stress, and related quality of life in 12 advanced cancer patients undergoing anticancer therapy. Nutrition. 2006;2:136–45. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2005.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Van Cutsem E, Arends J. The causes and consequences of cancer-associated ma lnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9(suppl 2):S51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tian J, Chen ZC, Hang LF. The effects of psychological status of the patients with digestive system cancers on prognosis of the disease. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32:230–5. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b59c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Greer S. Cancer and the mind. Maudsley Bequest Lecture delivered before the Royal College of Psychiatrists, February 1983. Br J Psychiatry. 1983;143:535–43. doi: 10.1192/bjp.143.6.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miller AH. Neuroendocrine and immune system interactions in stress and depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1998;21:443–63. doi: 10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Massie MJ. Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004;(32):57–71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hofman M, Ryan JL, Figueroa-Moseley CD, Jean-Pierre P, Morrow GR. Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem. Oncologist. 2007;12(suppl 1):4–10. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-S1-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Díaz N, Menjón S, Rolfo C, et al. Patients’ perception of cancer-related fatigue: results of a survey to assess the impact on their everyday life. Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;10:753–7. doi: 10.1007/s12094-008-0282-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haghighat S, Akbari ME, Holakouei K, Rahimi A, Montazeri A. Factors predicting fatigue in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:533–8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0473-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Romito F, Montanaro R, Corvasce C, Di Bisceglie M, Mattioli V. Is cancer-related fatigue more strongly correlated to haematological or to psychological factors in cancer patients? Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:943–6. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0357-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D, et al. Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients: new findings from the Fatigue Coalition. Oncologist. 2000;5:353–60. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-5-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gunn GB, Mendoza TR, Garden AS, et al. Patient-reported fatigue in head and neck cancer survivors [abstract 5523] J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 [Available online at: http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/80318-102; cited 20 April 2015] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown LF, Kroenke K. Cancer-related fatigue and its associations with depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Psychosomatics. 2009;50:440–7. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(09)70835-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Talmi YP, Horowitz Z, Bedrin L, et al. Quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2002;94:1012–17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cengiz M, Ozyar E, Esassolak M, et al. Assessment of quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with eortc qlq-C30 and H&N-35 modules. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1347–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Oncology are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES