Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2015 Apr 15;30(2):164–171. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14127

The Impact of Injections of Different Nutrients on the Bacterial Community and Its Dechlorination Activity in Chloroethene-Contaminated Groundwater

Takamasa Miura 1,*, Atsushi Yamazoe 1, Masako Ito 2, Shoko Ohji 1, Akira Hosoyama 1, Yoh Takahata 2, Nobuyuki Fujita 1
PMCID: PMC4462927  PMID: 25877696

Abstract

Dehalococcoides spp. are currently the only organisms known to completely reduce cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-DCE) and vinyl chloride (VC) to non-toxic ethene. However, the activation of fermenting bacteria that generate acetate, hydrogen, and CO2 is considered necessary to enhance the dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides and enable the complete dechlorination of chloroethenes. In the present study, we stimulated chloroethene-contaminated groundwater by injecting different nutrients prepared from yeast extract or polylactate ester using a semicontinuous culture system. We then evaluated changes in the bacterial community structure and their relationship with dechlorination activity during the biostimulation. The populations of Dehalococcoides and the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Spirochaetes increased in the yeast extract-amended cultures and chloroethenes were completely dechlorinated. However, the phylum Proteobacteria was dominant in polylactate ester-amended cultures, in which almost no cis-DCE and VC were dechlorinated. These results provide fundamental information regarding possible interactions among bacterial community members involved in the dechlorination process and support the design of successful biostimulation strategies.

Keywords: bioremediation, dechlorination, chloroethene, Dehalococcoides, bacterial community


Chloroethenes such as tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-DCE), and vinyl chloride (VC) are frequently detected as contaminants in groundwater, and are specified as environmentally regulated substances in Japan. Under anaerobic conditions, the biological reductive dechlorination of these chloroethenes to nontoxic ethene is catalyzed by dehalorespiring bacteria (26). While many bacteria transform PCE and TCE to cis-DCE, Dehalococcoides is the only organism known to be capable of dechlorinating cis-DCE and VC to ethene (19, 25). Accordingly, it is important that Dehalococcoides inhabits aquifers being remediated in order to enable the complete dechlorination of chloroethenes to ethene. Hendrickson et al. reported that a close relationship existed between the presence of the Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene and complete dechlorination in 24 samples with geographic origins scattered throughout North America and Europe (15).

Chloroethenes serve as the electron acceptor during anaerobic dechlorination, and electrons are derived from the oxidation of hydrogen and organic compounds such as acetate, lactate, pyruvate, butyrate, propionate, glucose, and alcohol (4, 6, 8, 9). Specifically, Dehalococcoides isolates exhibit low growth rates and specific essential nutrient requirements, including hydrogen as the electron donor, acetate as the carbon source, chlorinated or brominated compounds as respiratory electron acceptors, and vitamin B12 as a co-factor (20). Dechlorinating bacterial communities generally contain other microbes that are able to ferment organic substrates into acetate and hydrogen such as Acetobacterium, Citrobacter, Clostridium, Desulfovibrio, Eubacterium, and Spirochaetes, as well as Dehalococcoides as the key dechlorinating bacteria. Syntrophs such as Desulfovibrio and Acetobacterium have been shown to facilitate the growth and dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides mccartyi 195T through the fermentation of lactate to acetate and hydrogen and biosynthesis of vitamin B12 (14, 22). These finding suggest that the stimulation of syntrophs cohabiting with Dehalococcoides play a key role in efficient bioremediation.

Although Tang et al. reported that D. mccartyi 195T contained complete amino acid biosynthesis pathways with acetate and CO2 as carbon sources (29), this strain has been shown to actively incorporate exogenous amino acids in order to facilitate growth and dechlorination (21), suggesting that an injection of amino acids direct enhances the dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides inhabiting bioremediation sites.

In the present study, we demonstrated the biostimulation of anaerobic semicontinuous cultures using chloroethene-contaminated groundwater. Specifically, we investigated alterations in dechlorination activities, bacterial community structures, and Dehalococcoides densities in semicontinuous cultures injected with different nutrients that had been developed for groundwater remediation. Alternations in each of the above parameters were found to be closely related to the components of the nutrients. Our results provide useful information that will aid in the selection of proper nutrients for the biostimulation of chloroethenes degradation.

Materials and Methods

Construction of semicontinuous cultures

Groundwater (unconfined aquifer, GL –2.5 m to –11 m) and medium sand (GL –5.2 m to –5.4 m) were collected from a chloroethene-contaminated aquifer in Japan. The base semicontinuous culture was constructed by mixing 550 mL of groundwater, 20 g of medium sand, and 3 mL of TCE solution (70 mg L−1; Kanto Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) in a 500-mL culture bottle. The nutrients, HRC (Regenesis, San Clemente, CA, USA), TM-B (Taisei, Kanagawa, Japan), and EDC (Ecocycle, Tokyo, Japan) were diluted 10-fold in deionized water, after which 2.8-mL aliquots were added to the base semicontinuous cultures. To achieve pH control, 1.7 mL of NaHCO3 (75 g L−1) and NaCO3 (25 g L−1) were added to the culture injected with EDC. These cultures were then grown in a continuously stirred chamber at 20°C for a total of 115 d.

Analytical procedures

Chlorinated compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Network GC System; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) through a headspace sampler (200°C upon injection, Network Headspace Sampler; Agilent Technologies) and a GC column (HP-1, 60 m×0.32 mm×1.0 μm; Agilent Technologies). The column was held at 35°C for 2 min, after which the temperature was increased to 170°C at 15°C min−1. Helium was applied as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.5 mL min−1. Ions were analyzed using a HPLC system (Alliance 2695XC Separation Module; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Cations were analyzed using a Shodex IC YS-50 column (Showa Denko, Tokyo, Japan) with CH3SO3H (4 mM) applied at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 and a temperature of 40°C. Anions were analyzed using a Shodex IC SI-50 4E column (Showa Denko) with Na2CO3 (3.2 mM) and NaHCO3 (1.0 mM) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 and a temperature of 40°C. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was analyzed using a total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after filtering samples through 0.45-μm pore size poly-ethersulfone membranes (Millipore, Tokyo, Japan). Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and pH were measured using a Horiba pH meter D-24 and D-52 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan), respectively. The total number of bacteria was determined by the acridine orange direct count method (16).

DNA extraction

Each 5-mL culture was filtered through a 0.22-μm pore size poly-carbonate membrane (Millipore) and then stored at −80°C until later analyses. The biomass was then suspended in 567 μL of TE buffer (pH 8.0), 30 μL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (10% [w/v]), and 3 μL of proteinase K (20 mg mL−1), after which the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 60 min. A total of 100 μL of NaCl (5 M) and 80 μL of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (10% [w/v])/NaCl (0.7 M) solution were then added to the mixture, which was incubated at 65°C for 10 min. Eight hundred microliters of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was then added and mixed gently, after which the mixture was centrifuged for 5 min at room temperature and 20,000×g. A total of 600 μL of supernatant was then recovered and an equal amount of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1 [v/v/v]) was added. After mixing gently, the mixture was centrifuged for 5 min at room temperature and 20,000×g, and 550 μL of supernatant was recovered. A total of 5.5 μL of the precipitation carrier (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan), 55 μL of sodium acetate (3 M, pH5.2), and 550 μL of isopropyl alcohol were then added and the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C and 20,000×g. The DNA pellet was then washed with 1 mL of ethanol (70% [v/v]) and centrifuged at 4°C and 20,000×g for 5 min. The air-dried DNA pellet was dissolved in 50 μL of TE buffer.

Quantitative PCR

The copy number of Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA genes was determined by quantitative PCR using an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The primers, 624-Fw (5′-CAGCAGGAGAAAACGGAATT-3′) and 1232-Rv (5′-GACAGCTTTGGGGATTAGC-3′), have been described previously (30). Each 25-μL reaction mixture contained 10.8 μL of sterilized deionized water, 12.5 μL 2×SYBR Premix (Takara Bio), 0.1 μL 624-Fw primer (100 μM), 0.1 μL 1232-Rv primers (100 μM), 0.5 μL 50×ROX Dye (Takara Bio), and 1 μL extracted DNA. PCR was conducted by subjecting the samples to 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 54°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s.

16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and data analysis

The 16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR using the primers 338F_PA_V3F (5′-CGTATCGCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) (17) and 1046R_PB_V6R (5′-CTATGCGCCTTGCCAGCCCGCTCAGCGACAGCCATGCAGCACCT-3′) (27) containing adaptor and key sequences (underlines) for 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencing (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Each 25-μL reaction mixture contained 2.5 μL 10×buffer, 2.5 μL dNTPs (2 mM each), 1 μL DMSO, 1 μL 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.25 μL Blend Taq (2.5 U μL−1) (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), and 1 μL template DNA (approximately 3 ng). The cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 5 min followed by 23 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1 min, and then a final extension at 70°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The concentration of PCR products was estimated using PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation reagent (Molecular Probes, Karlsruhe, Germany), and the quality of PCR products was checked using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). The amplicon samples were sequenced using a GS FLX Titanium system (Roche). Bacterial community analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene and a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) were performed using the MacQIIME software package (2) and Greengenes 13_5 dataset (5). A phylogenetic tree of Dehalococcoides was constructed by the maximum likelihood estimation method using MEGA software version 5.2 (28). Denoised and trimmed sequences were deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers DRA002417 (control_day115, day13, day40, day73 and day88; DRR021760 to DRR021764, HRC_day115, day13, day40, day73 and day88; DDR021750 to DDR021754, TM-B_day115, day13, day40, day73 and day88; DRR021755 to DRR021759, EDC_day115, day13, day40, day73 and day88; DRR021745 to DRR021749).

Results

Analysis of key parameters after the nutrient treatment

To enhance the anaerobic dechlorination activity of the dechlorinating organisms in the groundwater, the nutrients HRC, TM-B, and EDC were injected into semicontinuous cultures. HRC was mainly composed of poly-lactate ester to produce the controlled release of lactic acid, while TM-B and EDC were derived from yeast extract (100% and 19%, respectively). In addition, EDC contained lactose (65%) and sodium propionate (15%) (U.S. Patent No. 8,790,912). A semicontinuous culture without nutrients was used as a negative control.

The groundwater used in this study was contaminated with 466 μL−1 of cis-DCE and 197 μg L−1 of PCE, while the levels of VC and TCE were low (47 μg L−1 and 39 μg L−1, respectively) (Table 1). The pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) values of groundwater before the injection of the nutrients were 6.3 and −180 mV, respectively, and the DOC was only 4.4 mg L−1. Although the total number of bacteria was 3.1×106, only a small amount of Dehalococcoides was present (4.5 cells mL−1).

Table 1.

Parameter analysis of the groundwater used for semicontinuous cultures

Chloroethenes (μg L−1)
 tetrachloroethene 197
 trichloroethene 39
cis-1,2-dichloroethene 466
trans-1,2-dichloroethene 2
 1,1-dichloroethene 1
 vinyl chloride 47

pH 6.3
ORP (mV) −180
DOC (mg L−1) 4.4

Total number of bacteria (cells mL−1) 3.1×106
Number of Dehalococcoides (cells mL−1) 4.5

To evaluate the effects of the nutrient injection, semicontinuous cultures were monitored between 0 and 115 d during eight incubation periods (Table 2). The ORP was +134 mV at 0 d (Table 2), while this value ranged from −164 mV to −277 mV in cultures injected with nutrients during the incubation period, indicating that the conditions remained anaerobic throughout the experiment (115 d). The DOC of cultures treated with TM-B and EDC were 146.7 and 203.1 mg L−1 at 0 d, while these values decreased to 12.0 and 9.4 mg L−1 at 115 d, respectively (Table 2). However, reductions in the DOC of the culture with HRC occurred slightly later (from 201.4 mg L−1 [0 d] to 57.0 mg L−1 [115 d]). Although the pH of the cultures treated with TM-B and EDC remained at approximately 6.8, that of the culture treated with HRC decreased to below 6.4.

Table 2.

Parameter analysis of semicontinuous cultures

Incubation time (d) ORP (mV) DOC (mg L−1) pH



control HRC TM-B EDC control HRC TM-B EDC control HRC TM-B EDC
0 134 134 134 134 5.7 201.4 146.7 203.1 6.4 6.4 6.5 7.0
13 74 −217 −230 −231 3.2 183.3 101.9 147.4 6.5 5.9 6.5 6.3
27 −176 −219 −182 −182 3.6 156.5 73.6 136.6 6.8 6.3 6.6 6.4
42 6 −236 −187 −249 3.2 133.1 41.4 117.2 6.6 5.6 6.8 6.4
57 196 −243 −277 −267 1.3 160.1 43.7 85.9 6.4 5.6 6.5 6.7
73 201 −209 −190 −181 2.9 113.4 26.6 36.5 6.9 6.1 7.0 7.0
88 −170 −195 −164 −185 2.3 86.4 14.0 24.1 6.8 6.1 6.8 6.8
115 −178 −216 −214 −168 1.7 57.0 12.0 9.4 6.7 6.3 6.8 6.9

Incubation time (d) NH4-N (mg L−1) PO4-P (mg L−1) SO42− (mg L−1)



control HRC TM-B EDC control HRC TM-B EDC control HRC TM-B EDC

0 1.0 1.0 2.6 ND ND ND 18.8 ND 57.9 57.3 57.8 59.5
13 0.9 ND 26.4 3.9 ND ND 14.1 ND 58.0 45.5 0.9 2.6
27 0.9 ND 27.0 4.8 ND ND 7.9 ND 56.6 ND 0.6 ND
42 1.0 ND 26.8 5.1 ND ND 6.4 ND 57.0 0.7 ND 0.7
57 0.8 ND 25.9 4.8 ND ND 5.9 ND 56.4 0.7 0.6 0.6
73 0.9 ND 24.8 4.9 ND ND 8.4 ND 56.2 1.1 ND ND
88 1.0 ND 23.3 4.9 ND ND 8.6 ND 56.3 0.5 0.6 0.4
115 1.0 ND 22.3 4.7 ND ND ND ND 57.5 ND 8.7 ND

ND, not detected

The ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4-N) of the cultures treated with TM-B and EDC increased from 2.6 mg L−1 and ND (not detected) at 0 d to 26.4 mg L−1 and 3.9 mg L−1 at 13 d, respectively. However, the NH4-N of the control culture and the cultures treated with HRC was less than 1.0 mg L−1. Phosphate phosphorus (PO4-P) was detected in the cultures treated with TM-B at 18.8 mg L−1 at 0 d, but was absent at 115 d. SO42− was detected in all cultures at levels ranging from 57.3 to 59.5 mg L−1 at 0 d, but was reduced to 0.9 mg L−1 and 2.6 mg L−1 after 13 d in cultures treated with TM-B and EDC, respectively. Additionally, SO42− decreased from 45.5 mg L−1 at 13 d to ND at 27 d in cultures treated with HRC.

Monitoring of chloroethenes and Dehalococcoides population

The time course of chloroethene levels in the cultures is shown in Fig. 1. PCE and TCE slowly decreased in the control culture and the culture treated with HRC; however, significant reductions in cis-DCE and VC were not confirmed (Fig. 1A and B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Dechlorination of chloroethenes in control culture (A), cultures with HRC (B), TM-B (C), and EDC (D). Crosses, PCE; filled triangles, TCE; filled squares, cis-DCE; filled diamonds, VC.

PCE and TCE decreased more rapidly in cultures treated with TM-B and EDC than in the control culture and the culture treated with HRC, then continued to decrease until they were near the detection limit within 20 d (Fig. 1C and D). In the culture treated with TM-B, cis-DCE decreased from 689.6 μg L−1 at 27 d to 126.4 μg L−1 at 42 d, while VC increased from 27.8 μg L−1 at 13 d to 338.8 μg L−1 at 42 d (Fig. 1C). However, cis-DCE and VC then decreased to 0.5 μg L−1 and 0.4 μg L−1 at 73 d, respectively. Although cis-DCE remained almost constant for 57 d (637.5 μg L−1) in the culture treated with EDC, it decreased to 0.6 μg L−1 at 73 d (Fig. 1D). Similarly, VC remained relatively high until day 73 (26.3 μg L−1), but decreased to 0.7 μg L−1 by 88 d.

The cell density of Dehalococcoides in each culture was measured by quantitative real-time PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene copy number of Dehalococcoides (Fig. 2). The cell density of the culture treated with TM-B increased from 2.2±1.2×10 cells mL−1 at 13 d to 7.8±1.2×104 cells mL−1 at 57 d, then gradually decreased to 2.0±0.6×104 cells mL−1 at 115 d. Similarly, the cell density of the culture treated with EDC in-creased from 0.7±1.2 cells mL−1 at 13 d to 6.4±2.1×104 cells mL−1 at 88 d, then decreased to 9.1±0.3×103 cells mL−1 at 115 d. Although Dehalococcoides increased slightly at 40 and 115 d in the control culture and the culture treated with HRC, it showed almost no increase throughout the incubation periods. These changes in the cell densities of Dehalococcoides matched the dechlorination activities of the respective cultures.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The number of Dehalococcoides cells in semicontinuous cultures. Crosses, culture control; filled diamonds, culture HRC; filled triangles, culture TM-B; filled squares, culture EDC. Error bars indicate standard deviations (n=3).

Analysis of the bacterial community by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing

We conducted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to investigate bacterial communities during the dechlorination process in semicontinuous cultures. A total of 259,715 sequences were obtained after denoising and removing the chimeric sequences. A taxonomic analysis at the phylum level is shown in Fig. 3, while a taxonomic analysis at the genus level of the major taxonomic groups, which accounted for more than 1% in at least one culture, is shown in Table 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Bacterial diversity of semicontinuous cultures at the phylum level.

Table 3.

Major taxonomic groups found by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (%)

phylum order genus control HRC


day 13 day 40 day 73 day 88 day 115 day 13 day 40 day 73 day 88 day 115
Actinobacteria Actinomycetales Propionicimonas <0.1 <0.1 ND ND ND ND 2.8 4.2 5.1 2.0
Bacteroidetes Bacteroidales Bacteroides ND <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ND ND <0.1 ND <0.1
Blvii28 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.1 0.1 ND
unassigned 1 1.1 0.4 1.7 1.6 0.9 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.8 1.3
unassigned 2 0.2 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 ND ND 0.1
Chloroflexi Dehalococcoidales Dehalococcoides <0.1 ND ND <0.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Firmicutes Bacilli unassigned 3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ND ND 0.1 <0.1 ND ND ND
Clostridiales Anaeromusa ND ND ND ND ND 2.2 8.9 6.3 4.0 0.6
Pelosinus <0.1 ND ND ND ND 24.4 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.2
unassigned 4 <0.1 ND <0.1 ND ND <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.6 0.2
unassigned 5 <0.1 ND ND <0.1 <0.1 12.9 0.2 0.7 1.1 0.3
Proteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonas 5.8 10.1 13.5 16.0 11.1 0.7 10.0 10.5 10.3 13.9
Burkholderiales Janthinobacterium 28.5 58.1 59.3 55.9 50.7 2.9 44.7 52.6 49.6 55.2
Desulfovibrionales Desulfovibrio <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 4.8 0.7 2.5 3.4 1.6
Desulfuromonadales Geobacter 1.7 0.3 0.8 1.2 2.6 6.6 0.5 2.5 5.2 1.6
Pseudomonadales Pseudomonas 7.3 26.9 13.8 12.3 10.8 4.6 24.6 13.0 10.6 15.5
Spirochaetes Spirochaetales Treponema 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.7

phylum order genus TM-B EDC


day 13 day 40 day 73 day 88 day 115 day 13 day 40 day 73 day 88 day 115

Actinobacteria Actinomycetales Propionicimonas ND <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ND 0.1 0.5 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Bacteroidetes Bacteroidales Bacteroides 1.5 4.3 4.8 5.0 5.5 1.7 2.9 1.6 0.6 3.9
Blvii28 2.4 1.1 3.0 2.0 4.7 5.6 3.6 5.9 2.3 20.0
unassigned 1 1.4 26.1 16.7 11.5 27.9 7.6 11.6 19.9 16.4 17.7
unassigned 2 62.0 29.1 31.3 29.1 20.5 45.9 31.4 23.6 18.9 8.1
Chloroflexi Dehalococcoidales Dehalococcoides ND 0.5 1.8 1.7 0.9 ND <0.1 0.9 1.3 0.2
Firmicutes Bacilli unassigned 3 0.2 1.8 0.6 0.5 1.6 9.2 15.4 9.2 3.8 3.4
Clostridiales Anaeromusa ND ND <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ND ND ND ND ND
Pelosinus <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.1 ND 0.1 <0.1
unassigned 4 0.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.3 0.9 1.6 1.4 0.7
unassigned 5 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5
Proteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonas 0.1 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.5 0.7 1.3 2.5 6.1 3.6
Burkholderiales Janthinobacterium 0.9 7.1 8.9 6.5 5.4 2.1 7.5 8.9 17.4 18.7
Desulfovibrionales Desulfovibrio 0.7 0.8 2.6 2.2 1.7 0.7 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.8
Desulfuromonadales Geobacter 0.4 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.9 2.4 1.1
Pseudomonadales Pseudomonas 2.4 3.4 2.4 1.7 1.6 0.7 3.9 2.4 4.5 4.0
Spirochaetes Spirochaetales Treponema 0.6 2.8 6.4 9.2 5.9 0.4 0.8 2.7 6.5 2.3

ND, not detected

In the control culture, Proteobacteria was dominant on all incubation days (96.2% at 13 d, 98.4% at 40 d, 95.0% at 73 d, 92.8% at 88 d, and 87.7% at 115 d), and the class Betaproteobacteria accounted for over half of the Proteobacteria (66.1%, 60.7%, 66.9%, 64.0%, and 66.7%, respectively). These results demonstrated that the phylum Proteobacteria was dominant in the groundwater used in this study. At the genus level, Sphingomonas, Janthinobacterium, and Pseudomonas accounted for up to 95% of the community (Table 3), while almost no members of the classes Deltaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria were observed.

In the culture treated with HRC, the bacterial community structure showed some similarity to that of the control culture, although the level of the members of the phylum Firmicutes was higher, reaching 44.7% at 13 d. The OTUs assigned to the genus unassigned 5 (family Veillonellaceae, Table 3) and the genus Pelosinus accounted for 12.9% and 24.4% of the population, respectively. Furthermore, levels of the genus Propionicimonas (phylum Actinobacteria) increased from 0.0% at 13 d to 5.1% at 88 d, and the proportions of the genus Anaeromusa (phylum Clostridium) were greater than 2.2% from 0 to 88 d.

In the culture treated with TM-B, the proportion of the phylum Bacteroidetes decreased from 75.7% at 13 d to 49.3% at 88 d, then increased to 60.1% at 115 d. The OTU assigned to the genus unassigned 2 (family Porphyromonadaceae, Table 3) was the most abundant genus in Bacteroidetes at 13 d; however, the OTU gradually decreased to 20.5% at 115 d. Among Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria was the most abundant class at 13 d, while Deltaproteobacteria containing the genera Desulfovibrio and Geobacter and the family Syntrophorhabdaceae gradually increased from 7.3% of the Proteobacteria at 13 d to 48.6% at 88 d. Concomitantly, Dehalococcoides increased from 0% at 13 d to 1.7% at 88 d (1.8% at 73 d), while the genus Treponema (phylum Spirochaetes) increased from 0.6% at 13 d to 9.2% at 88 d.

In the culture treated with EDC, Dehalococcoides and Treponema showed slower increases than those in the culture treated with TM-B. Specifically, the levels of these organisms increased from 0% at 13 d to 1.3% at 88 d and from 0.4% at 13 d to 6.5% at 88 d, respectively. The proportion of the syntroph Desulfovibrio (1.1% at 73 d) was also smaller than that in the culture treated with TM-B (2.6% at 73 d). The alternations observed in Dehalococcoides and these bacteria in the cultures treated with TM-B and EDC coincided closely with the dechlorination of chloroethenes.

A PCoA analysis confirmed that the bacterial community structures and their temporal variations were highly dependent on nutrient treatments (Fig. 4). The first principal coordinate axis (PC1) and second principal coordinate axis (PC2) accounted for 75.63% and 7.16% of the overall variation, respectively. The structures of the cultures treated with TM-B and EDC (cis-DCE dechlorinating cultures), as well as those of the control culture and the culture treated with HRC (cis-DCE non-dechlorinating cultures) were highly similar. Moreover, temporal variations, which were well represented by PC2 in each culture, were highly synchronous between cultures treated with TM-B and EDC, and between the control culture and the culture treated with HRC, respectively. The only exception was the culture treated with HRC at 13 d (Fig. 4), for which a unique abundance of the genus Pelosinus (24.4%) and Veillonellaceae bacteria (12.9%) was observed (Table 3). Men et al. also reported that bacteria related to Pelosinus spp. were the most abundant species in a dechlorinating culture amended with lactate (23). The reason for the failure of these bacteria to continue to grow beyond 13 d under our experimental conditions currently remains unclear.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the MacQIIME pipeline. C13; control_day13, C40; control_day40, C73; control_day73, C88; control_day88, C115; control_day115, H13; HRC_day13, H40; HRC_day40, H73; HRC_day73, H88; HRC_day88, H115; HRC_day115, T13; TM-B_day13, T40; TM-B_day40, T73; TM-B_day73, T88; TM-B_day88, T115; TM-B_day115, E13; EDC_day13, E40; EDC_day40, E73; EDC_day73, E88; EDC_day88, E115; EDC_day115.

Phylogenetic analysis of Dehalococcoides in semicontinuous cultures

The 16S rRNA genes of the Dehalococcoides isolates share >98% similarity with each other (20). Therefore, only one major OTU (OTU339) assigned to the genus Dehalococcoides was generated by an analysis of the QIIME pipeline using a 97% similarity threshold. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the representative sequence of this OTU was affiliated with the Victoria subgroup of Dehalococcoides and showed 99.5% (550/553) similarity to D. mccartyi VS (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Phylogenetic analysis of Dehalococcoides strains and OTU339 based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. The tree was calculated using a maximum-likelihood estimation with bootstrap values. Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens BL-DC-9T was used as an outgroup.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated the anaerobic biostimulation of semicontinuous cultures using chloroethene-contaminated groundwater and compared reductive dechlorination in response to three nutrient additives. The initial concentration of cis-DCE in the groundwater sample used in this study was higher (446 μg L−1) than that of other chloroethene species (Table 1). Since the cell density of indigenous Dehalococcoides was very low (4.5 cells mL−1), natural attenuation by anaerobic dechlorination from cis-DCE to VC appeared to have occurred slowly. In the control culture, the cell density of Dehalococcoides was decreased with a concomitant elevation in the ORP from 42 to 73 d; however, the primary cause of this elevation has yet to be clarified (Table 2 and Fig. 2). After being incubated for 115 d, PCE and TCE were completely dechlorinated to cis-DCE in all cultures injected with nutrients, even though the Dehalococcoides population was low throughout the incubation period (Table 3). These results suggested that dehalorespiring bacteria other than Dehalococcoides were primarily responsible for the transformation of PCE and TCE to cis-DCE. While cultures treated with TM-B and EDC actively dechlorinated cis-DCE and VC to ethene, cis-DCE and VC accumulated in the culture treated with HRC, despite the ORP remaining at approximately −220 mV from 13 to 115 d (Table 2). This may have been causally related, at least in part, to the pH of the culture treated with HRC, which was below 6.4 from 0 to 115 d. It was assumed that the activity of Dehalococcoides was low in the culture treated with HRC because the dechlorination and growth of Dehalococcoides preferentially occurred at a neutral pH of 6.0–8.0, with the highest activity occurring between pH 6.9 and 7.5 (20). The cell density of the culture treated with HRC decreased from 42 to 88 d with a concomitant decrease in pH (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Alternatively, because the DOC in the culture injected with HRC decreased at a slower rate than in those treated with TM-B or EDC (Table 2), the available concentration of organic carbons such as acetate derived from polylactate ester may not have been sufficient to enhance the growth and dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides. The NH4-N levels of the culture treated with TM-B were 5-fold greater than those of the culture treated with EDC, whereas no NH4-N was generated in the control culture or the culture treated with HRC (Table 2). NH4-N is considered to be a degraded product derived from the yeast extract present in the nutrients; therefore, the amino acids required for the activation of Dehalococcoides were in short supply in the culture treated with HRC.

Previous studies have also shown that cis-DCE and VC were dechlorinated in a culture injected with EDC (18), but not in cultures injected with HRC or lactate (6, 24). Taken together, these findings suggested that these differential effects were the result of differences in the components of each nutrient rather than or in addition to differences in pH or the overall availability of carbon sources. TM-B and EDC contained 100% and 19% yeast extract, respectively, while the main component of HRC is polylactate, suggesting that Dehalococcoides prefers components such as amino acids and inorganic materials present in yeast extract. The importance of amino acids was also supported by the previous finding that D. mccartyi 195T not only had the potential to synthesize all amino acids, but also strongly imported some amino acids including phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, and methionine in laboratory cultures (31). Supplementation with amino acids is thought to be an important factor for enhancing the dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides during the in situ bioremediation of chloroethene-contaminated aquifers if the aquifer lacks these amino acids.

Bacterial communities containing other dechlorinaters and syntrophs are also considered to exert a stimulatory effect on Dehalococcoides. The bacterial community structures of cultures treated with TM-B and EDC were similar (Fig. 3), and the cell densities of Dehalococcoides increased to 7.8±1.2×104 cells mL−1 and 6.4±2.1×104 cells mL−1, respectively (Fig. 2). Previous studies reported that Dehalococcoides was often found with PCE and TCE degraders such as Dehalobacter, Desulfitobacterium, Geobacter, and Sulfurospirillum (1, 3, 6, 7, 25). Of these dechlorinating bacteria, Geobacter occurred most frequently in this study, being present in all cultures (Table 3). This was followed by Dehalobacter and Sulfurospirillum, which were present in smaller amounts in cultures treated with TM-B and EDC (data not shown). Conversely, although Desulfovibrio, a known syntroph, was found in the control culture and the culture treated with HRC (Table 3), cis-DCE and VC remained almost unchanged in these cultures, indicating that the dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides was not enhanced by this syntroph. These results suggest that suitable conditions for syntrophs are necessary for the activation of Dehalococcoides. The population of the genus Treponema (phylum Spirochaetes) increased simultaneously with Dehalococcoides from 13 to 88 d in cultures treated with TM-B and EDC (Fig. 3 and Table 3), and this genus was also detected in other dechlorination cultures (7, 10, 11, 13). This genus is a homoacetogen that is able to ferment some carbohydrates to acetate, hydrogen, and CO2, which are essential compounds for the growth of Dehalococcoides (12). Thus, Treponema may be the key syntroph required for the dechlorination of cis-DCE and VC by Dehalococcoides.

In a previous study, the complete dechlorination of TCE was observed in a dechlorinating consortium (ANAS) injected with lactate, in which the known fermenters of lactate and the other simple organics Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Citrobacter, were present (8). In this culture, high concentrations of hydrogen were rapidly generated, while dechlorination to ethene decreased simultaneously. Although Clostridium was detected in the present study, almost no Bacteroides or Citrobacter were detected in the culture treated with HRC (Fig. 3 and Table 3). These results suggest that Bacteroides and Citrobacter are important syntrophs for Dehalococcoides when fed with lactate.

In conclusion, we herein demonstrated that injections of TM-B and EDC increased the Dehalococcoides population and enhanced the reductive dechlorination of chloroethenes to ethene in this chloroethene-contaminated groundwater, possibly via the supplementation of compounds contained in yeast extract such as amino acids. Furthermore, the enhanced growth and dechlorination activity of Dehalococcoides coincided with increased proportions of the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Spirochaetes in the culture. These results provide useful information regarding the choice of appropriate nutrients and microorganisms as indicators for efficient biostimulation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Keiko Tsuchikane, Shinichi Baba, and Mitsuru Numata for their assistance with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and data analysis. This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan.

References

  • 1.Amos BK, Suchomel EJ, Pennell KD, Löffler FE. Spatial and temporal distributions of Geobacter lovleyi and Dehalococcoides spp. during bioenhanced PCE-NAPL dissolution. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:1977–1985. doi: 10.1021/es8027692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Daprato RC, Löffler FE, Hughes JB. Comparative analysis of three tetrachloroethene to ethene halorespiring consortia suggests functional redundancy. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:2261–2269. doi: 10.1021/es061544p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Bruin WP, Kotterman MJ, Posthumus MA, Schraa G, Zehnder AJ. Complete biological reductive transformation of tetrachloroethene to ethane. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:1996–2000. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.6.1996-2000.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5069–5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dugat-Bony E, Biderre-Petit C, Jaziri F, et al. In situ TCE degradation mediated by complex dehalorespiring communities during biostimulation processes. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5:642–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00339.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Duhamel M, Edwards EA. Growth and yields of dechlorinators, acetogens, and methanogens during reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes and dihaloelimination of 1,2-dichloroethane. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:2303–2310. doi: 10.1021/es062010r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Freeborn RA, West KA, Bhupathiraju VK, Chauhan S, Rahm BG, Richardson RE, Alvarez-Cohen L. Phylogenetic analysis of TCE-dechlorinating consortia enriched on a variety of electron donors. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;1:8358–8368. doi: 10.1021/es048003p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Freedman DL, Gossett JM. Biological reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene to ethylene under methanogenic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55:2144–2151. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.9.2144-2151.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Futagami T, Okamoto F, Hashimoto H, et al. Enrichment and characterization of a trichloroethene-dechlorinating consortium containing multiple “Dehalococcoides” strains. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2011;75:1268–1274. doi: 10.1271/bbb.110028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Futamata H, Kaiya S, Sugawara M, Hiraishi A. Phylogenetic and Transcriptional Analyses of a Tetrachloroethene-Dechlorinating “Dehalococcoides” Enrichment Culture TUT2264 and Its Reductive-Dehalogenase Genes. Microbes Environ. 2009;24:330–337. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me09133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Graber JR, Leadbetter JR, Breznak JA. Description of Treponema azotonutricium sp. nov. and Treponema primitia sp. nov., the first spirochetes isolated from termite guts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:1315–1320. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1315-1320.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gu AZ, Hedlund BP, Staley JT, Strand SE, Stensel HD. Analysis and comparison of the microbial community structures of two enrichment cultures capable of reductively dechlorinating TCE and cis-DCE. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6:45–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.He J, Holmes VF, Lee PK, Alvarez-Cohen L. Influence of vitamin B12 and cocultures on the growth of Dehalococcoides isolates in defined medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2847–2853. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02574-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hendrickson ER, Payne JA, Young RM, Starr MG, Perry MP, Fahnestock S, Ellis DE, Ebersole RC. Molecular analysis of Dehalococcoides 16S ribosomal DNA from chloroethene-contaminated sites throughout North America and Europe. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:485–495. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.485-495.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977;33:1225–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huse SM, Dethlefsen L, Huber JA, Welch DM, Relman DA, Sogin ML. Exploring Microbial Diversity and Taxonomy Using SSU rRNA Hypervariable Tag Sequencing. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ise K, Suto K, Inoue C. Characterization of an Enriched Anaerobic Culture Having Ability to Dechlorinate TCE. In: Tohji K, Tsuchiya N, Jeyadevan B, editors. Water Dynamics: 4th International Workshop on Water Dynamics. American Institute of Physics; USA: 2007. pp. 231–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Löffler FE, Edwards EA. Harnessing microbial activities for environmental cleanup. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17:274–284. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Löffler FE, Yan J, Ritalahti KM, Adrian L, Edwards EA, Konstantinidis KT, Muller JA, Fullerton H, Zinder SH, Spormann AM. Dehalococcoides mccartyi gen. nov., sp. nov., obligately organohalide-respiring anaerobic bacteria relevant to halogen cycling and bioremediation, belong to a novel bacterial class, Dehalococcoidia classis nov., order Dehalococcoidales ord. nov. and family Dehalococcoidaceae fam. nov., within the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:625–635. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.034926-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maymó-Gatell X, Chien Y, Gossett JM, Zinder SH. Isolation of a bacterium that reductively dechlorinates tetrachloroethene to ethene. Science. 1997;276:1568–1571. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5318.1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Men Y, Feil H, Verberkmoes NC, Shah MB, Johnson DR, Lee PK, West KA, Zinder SH, Andersen GL, Alvarez-Cohen L. Sustainable syntrophic growth of Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 with Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough and Methanobacterium congolense: global transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. ISME J. 2012;6:410–421. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Men Y, Lee PK, Harding KC, Alvarez-Cohen L. Characterization of four TCE-dechlorinating microbial enrichments grown with different cobalamin stress and methanogenic conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:6439–6450. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4896-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nishimura M, Ebisawa M, Sakihara S, Kobayashi A, Nakama T, Okochi M, Yohda M. Detection and identification of Dehalococcoides species responsible for in situ dechlorination of trichloroethene to ethene enhanced by hydrogen-releasing compounds. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2008;51:1–7. doi: 10.1042/BA20070171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rouzeau-Szynalski K, Maillard J, Holliger C. Frequent concomitant presence of Desulfitobacterium spp. and ‘Dehalococcoides’ spp. in chloroethene-dechlorinating microbial communities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:361–368. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-3042-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smidt H, de Vos WM. Anaerobic microbial dehalogenation. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004;58:43–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Mark Welch D, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:12115–12120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605127103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tang YJ, Yi S, Zhuang WQ, Zinder SH, Keasling JD, Alvarez-Cohen L. Investigation of carbon metabolism in “Dehalococcoides ethenogenes” strain 195 by use of isotopomer and transcriptomic analyses. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:5224–5231. doi: 10.1128/JB.00085-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ueno T, Okutsu N, Mizumoto M, Ishida H. Development and practical application of in situ anaerobic bioremediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with chloroethenes. J Environ Biotechnol. 2010;10:79–89. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhuang WQ, Yi S, Feng X, Zinder SH, Tang YJ, Alvarez-Cohen L. Selective utilization of exogenous amino acids by Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 and its effects on growth and dechlorination activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7797–7803. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05676-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES