Abstract
A novel stereocontrolled approach has been developed for the syntheses of tashiromine and epitashiromine alkaloids from cyclooctene β-amino acids. The synthetic concept is based on the azetidinone opening of a bicyclic β-lactam, followed by oxidative ring opening through ring C–C double bond and reductive ring-closure reactions of the cis- or trans-cyclooctene β-amino acids.
Keywords: alkaloids, amino acids, ring closure, ring opening, stereocontrolled synthesis
Introduction
Indolizidine alkaloids are an important class of naturally occurring compounds which have received considerable attention as a result of their valuable physiological properties. A number of representatives of this class exhibit glycosidase inhibitory activity or antimetastatic, anticancer, antitumour or anti-HIV properties [1–3]. A large number of natural products contain an indolizidine framework, among them (−)-δ-coniceine, (−)-swainsonine, indolizidine 167B [4–10], (+)-lentiginosine [11–15], (+)-slaframine [16], (−)-elaeokanine C [17], (+)-cyclizidine [18], lepadiformine [19], the highly oxygenated (+)-castanospermine [20–21], or pumiliotoxin [22]. Figure 1 illustrates the structures of several such compounds.
Figure 1.
Some indolizidine alkaloids.
Tashiromine is a natural indolizidine alkaloid isolated from Maackia tashiroi (1990). Strategies for the synthesis of indolizidine derivatives have received considerable interest from synthetic and medicinal chemists (Figure 2). A number of synthetic approaches have been described earlier for construction of the indolizidine framework; access to tashiromine in racemic form can be achieved through the alkylation of succinimide, followed by ring closure via acyliminium intermediates [23–24], the reduction of cyclized pyridinium salts [25], iminium cascade cyclization [26], alkyne-mediated hydroformylation–cyclization [27], or electrophilic pyrolidinone alkylation followed by ring closure [28–29]. Pyrrolidine alkylation and nucleophilic ring closure followed by C–C double bond hydroboration [30] leads to racemic epitashiromine, as does the N-alkylated succinimide transformation through the corresponding indolizidinone [31].
Figure 2.
Approaches to racemic tashiromine and epitashiromine.
Several synthetic procedures have also been developed for the preparation of tashiromine or epitashiromine enantiomers.
(+)-Tashiromine has been synthetized from a pyrrolidinone derivative through chiral Lewis acid-catalysed cyclization to substituted pyrrolidinones [17], by the intramolecular cyclization of a chiral alkenylated pyrrolidinone, followed by hydroxylation [32], or by the intramolecular ring closure of chiral pyrrolidine diesters followed by ester and oxo group reduction [33], while the syntheses of (+)-epitashiromine starts from a chiral morpholine derivative, with nitrone 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition and reduction [34] (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Synthetic routes to (+)-tashiromine and (+)-epitashiromine.
(−)-Tashiromine has been accessed through the ring closure of difunctionalized acyclic chiral sulfonamide-based β-amino acids [35], the cyclization of pyrrole derivatives with a chiral side-chain [36], or the enantioselective arylation of pyrrole, followed by saturation [37]. The transformation of chiral functionalized pyrrole or pyrrolidine derivatives has served as the basis of the construction of (−)-epitashiromine [38–39] (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Synthetic routes to (−)-tashiromine and (−)-epitashiromine.
The oxidative functionalization of cyclic β-amino acid derivatives has been reported to be a convenient route for the preparation of N-heterocyclic β-amino acid derivatives [40–41] or for the stereocontrolled synthesis of functionalized cispentacins [42] and their acyclic counterparts [43–44] (Figure 5). The oxidative ring cleavage of various vicinal diols and the transformation of the resulting dialdehyde intermediates has been efficiently applied in recent years for the synthesis of a series of valuable organic molecules [45–52]. In particular, Davies and co-workers have utilized the oxidative ring opening of cyclic vicinal diols followed by ring closure for access to pyrrolizidine alkaloids [45].
Figure 5.
Oxidative functionalizations of cyclic β-amino acids.
Results and Discussion
We describe here a novel access route for the synthesis of tashiromine and epitashiromine by starting from an unsaturated bicyclic β-lactam. The retrosynthetic concept of the synthesis is represented on Scheme 1 and was based on the lactam ring opening, in continuation followed by oxidative ring opening of the formed β-amino esters and by reductive ring closure as key steps.
Scheme 1.
Retrosynthesis of tashiromine and epitashiromine.
Bicyclic β-lactam (±)-1 [53–54] was first transformed by azetidinone opening to the corresponding amino ester hydrochloride (±)-2 [53–54], N-protection of which with benzyl chloroformate (Z-Cl) afforded protected amino ester (±)-3 in 78% yield. In agreement with our earlier observations [40–42] C–C double bond functionalization of the cyclooctene β-amino ester via dihydroxylation with N-methyl morpholine N-oxide (NMO) in the presence of OsO4 afforded the corresponding all-cis dihydroxylated ethyl β-aminocyclooctanecarboxylate (±)-4 in 90% yield (for dihydroxylation, see also reference [54]) (Scheme 2). Amino ester (±)-4 was next subjected through its vicinal diol moiety to oxidative ring opening with NaIO4 in MeOH at 20 °C, which resulted (monitored by TLC) in the corresponding ring-opened unstable diformyl intermediate (I1), which after work-up was immediately used without further purification (for several similar types of acyclic diformyl intermediates, see references [40–41,43–44]). Thus, the crude material was submitted to catalytic hydrogenolysis and after N-deprotection underwent double cyclization–reduction to furnish indolizidine ester (±)-5 in 41% yield after purification by chromatography.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of (±)-tashiromine ((±)-6).
Reduction of the ester group of (±)-5 with an excess of LiAlH4 in THF at 20 °C gave the corresponding tashiromine (±)-6 [35–37], which was isolated in 48% yield after purification by column chromatography (Scheme 2). The stereochemistry of (±)-6 was unequivocally assigned by NMR data, which were consistent with those reported [35–37].
A similar strategy was applied for the synthesis of epitashiromine. On reaction with NaOEt in EtOH at 20 °C, ethyl cis-β-aminocyclooctenecarboxylate (±)-3 underwent epimerization at C-1, leading after 18 h to an equilibrium mixture of cis and trans amino esters (1:1 ratio determined by 1H NMR on the crude mixture), the required trans isomer (±)-7 being separated from the cis counterpart and isolated in a yield of 48% by means of column chromatography. Dihydroxylation of (±)-7 with NMO/OsO4 next afforded an oily mixture of cis and trans dihydroxylated cyclooctane β-amino esters (diastereomeric mixture of (±)-8) in 77% overall yield after column chromatography. Our attempts to separate this nearly 1:1 mixture of the two dihydroxylated stereoisomers (determined on the basis of 1H NMR data) failed, but the mixture could be applied in the next ring-opening oxidation step, since it gave only one open-chain diformyl intermediate I2.
Similarly to the cis isomer, this unstable dialdehyde intermediate was subjected without isolation to catalytic hydrogenolysis, followed by reductive cyclization, to give the corresponding indolizidine ester (±)-9 in 40% yield. Finally, ester reduction with LiAlH4 in THF resulted in epitashiromine (±)-10 [32,34,39] in 53% yield after isolation by chromatography (Scheme 3). The stereochemistry of (±)-epitashiromine was assigned by NMR data, which were in agreement with those reported [32,34,39].
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of (±)-epitashiromine ((±)-10).
Conclusion
In summary, a novel stereocontrolled efficient method has been presented for the synthesis of tashiromine and epitashiromine alkaloids in six or seven steps, based on the preparation of cis or trans cyclooctene β-amino esters, followed by their oxidative ring cleavage and double reductive ring-closure reactions.
Experimental
General procedure for the Z-protection of amino esters
To a solution of amino ester hydrochloride ((±)-2 or (−)-2) [29] (17.8 mmol) in THF (40 mL), Et3N (9 mL) was added at 0 °C, followed by 7.8 mL (1 equivalent) of Z-Cl (a 50% solution in toluene). The mixture was stirred for 14 h at 20 °C, and then was diluted with EtOAc (120 mL). The organic layer was washed with H2O (3 × 60 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1), affording the amino ester.
General procedure for the dihydroxylation of amino esters
To a solution of cis or trans Z-protected amino ester ((±)-3, (−)-3 or (±)-7) (2.9 mmol) in acetone (30 mL) and H2O (1 mL), NMO (1.5 equivalents) and 2% OsO4 in t-BuOH (0.7 mL) were added and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 4 h. A saturated aqueous solution of Na2SO3 (40 mL) was then added, the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL), and the organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc 1:4) to give the dihydroxylated amino ester.
General procedure for epimerization of the cis-amino ester
To a solution of cis N-protected amino ester ((±)-3 or (−)-3) (3.3 mmol) in EtOH (30 mL), EtONa (1.5 equivalents) was added at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 18 h. H2O (70 mL) was then added, the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL), and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to give the trans isomer as a colourless oil.
General procedure for the oxidative ring opening/reductive ring closure of dihydroxylated amino esters
To a solution of dihydroxylated amino ester ((±)-4, (±)-8 or (−)-8) (2.46 mmol) in MeOH (25 mL), NaIO4 (2 equivalents) was added and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 45 min. It was then diluted with H2O (50 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was dissolved in EtOAc (30 mL), Pd/C (150 mg) was added and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 16 h. The catalyst was next filtered off through Celite. The crude mixture was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cl2/MeOH 95:5 or CH2Cl2/MeOH 9:1) to give the indolizidine derivative.
General procedure for reduction of the ester
To a solution of indolizidine carboxylate ((±)-5, (±)-9 or (−)-9) (1 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL), LiAlH4 (5 equivalents) was added at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 4 h. It was then cooled to 0 °C, H2O (2 mL) was added dropwise and the solid formed was filtered off through Celite. The filtrate was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 15 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude oil was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cl2/MeOH/NH4OH 90:8:2 or CH2Cl2/MeOH/NH4OH 90:5:5) to give the alkaloid.
Ethyl (1R*,2S*)-2-(benzyloxycarbonylamino)cyclooct-5-enecarboxylate ((±)-3)

A colourless oil (Rf 0.6, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1); yield: 78%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.76–1.87 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.88–1.97 (m, 1H, CH2), 1.98–2.07 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.09–2.18 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.22–2.31 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.43–2.52 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.82–2.89 (m, 1H, H-1), 4.12–4.21 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.22–4.30 (m, 1H, H-2), 5.08 (s, 2H, OCH2), 5.30 (brs, 1H, N-H), 5.60–5.74 (m, 2H, H-5 and H-6), 7.33–7.48 (m, 5H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 14.9, 24.4, 25.1, 26.6, 32.3, 46.4, 52.1, 60.6, 66.1, 128.5, 128.6, 129.2, 129.5, 130.7, 138.0, 156.3, 174.5; anal. calcd for C19H25NO4: C, 68.86; H, 7.60; N, 4.23; found: C, 68.59; H, 7.31; N, 3.93.
Ethyl (1R*,2S*,5R*,6S*)-2-(benzyloxycarbonylamino)-5,6-dihydroxycyclooctanecarboxylate ((±)-4)

A colourless oil (Rf 0.4, n-hexane/EtOAc 1:4); yield: 90%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.26 (t, J = 7.15 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.62–1.94 (m, 4H, CH2), 1.97–2.28 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.77–2.82 (m, 1H, H-1), 3.83–3.89 (m, 2H, H-5 and H-6), 4.02–4.10 (m, 1H, H-2), 4.11–4.19 (m, 2H, OCH2), 5.09 (m, 2H, OCH2), 5.49 (brs, 1H, N-H), 7.36–7.48 (m, 5H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 14.8, 21.2, 26.9, 28.5, 29.0, 45.4, 51.6, 60.7, 65.9, 72.3, 72.4, 128.4, 128.5, 129.1, 138.1, 156.3, 174.6; anal. calcd for C19H27NO6: C, 62.45; H, 7.45; N, 3.83; found: C, 62.19; H, 7.10; N, 4.13.
Ethyl (8R*,8aS*)-octahydroindolizine-8-carboxylate ((±)-5)

A yellow oil (Rf 0.55, CH2Cl2/MeOH 95:5); yield: 41%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.27 (t, J = 7.15 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.46–1.53 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.57–1.92 (m, 5H, CH2), 1.99–2.10 (m, 3H, CH2), 2.13–2.20 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.25–2.31 (m, 1H, H-8), 3.03–3.10 (m, 2H, CH2 and H-8a); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.6, 20.9, 25.1, 29.5, 30.1, 48.4, 52.6, 54.4, 60.6, 65.6, 174.6; MS (ESI) m/z: 198.5 [M + 1]; anal. calcd for C11H19NO2: C, 66.97; H, 9.71; N, 7.10; found: C, 66.60; H, 10.02; N, 7.39.
((8R*,8aS*)-Octahydroindolizin-8-yl)methanol; ((±)-tashiromine (±)-6) [35–37]

A yellow oil (Rf 0.45, CH2Cl2/MeOH/NH4OH 90:8:2); yield: 48%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.00–1.11 (m, 1H, CH2), 1.42–1.53 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.58–1.83 (m, 5H, CH2), 1.84–1.99 (m, 3H, CH2), 2.04–2.11 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.03–3.10 (m, 2H, N-CH), 3.41–3.46 (m, 1H, OCH2), 3.59–3.64 (m, 1H, OCH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.1, 25.5, 28.0, 29.4, 44.9, 53.1, 54.5, 66.0, 66.9; MS (ESI) m/z: 156.6 [M + 1]; anal. calcd for C9H17NO: C, 69.63; H, 11.04; N, 9.02; found: C, 69.28; H, 10.70; N, 8.76.
Ethyl (1S*,2S*)-2-(benzyloxycarbonylamino)cyclooct-5-enecarboxylate ((±)-7)

A colourless oil (Rf 0.55, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1); yield: 48%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 1.18 (t, J = 7.10 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.55–1.64 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.73–1.97 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.04–2.19 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.33–2.47 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.68–2.75 (m, 1H, H-1), 3.88–4.02 (m, 3H, OCH2 and H-2), 4.96–5.02 (m, 2H, OCH2), 5.53–5.60 (m, 2H, H-5 and H-6), 7.30–7.44 (m, 5H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 14.8, 24.5, 25.1, 29.2, 33.8, 49.2, 52.1, 60.4, 65.9, 128.0, 128.4, 129.0, 129.1, 130.7, 138.2, 156.9, 174.5; anal. calcd for C19H25NO4: C, 68.86; H, 7.60; N, 4.23; found: C, 68.57; H, 7.28; N, 3.97.
Ethyl (8S*,8aS*)-octahydroindolizine-8-carboxylate ((±)-9)

A yellow oil (Rf 0.45, CH2Cl2/MeOH 4:1); yield: 40%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.28 (t, J = 7.15 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.28–1.33 (m, 1H, CH2), 1.42–1.55 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.58–1.64 (m, 1H, CH2), 1.68–1.86 (m, 3H, CH2), 2.02–2.18 (m, 3H, CH2), 2.23–2.27 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.78–2.81 (m, 1H, H-8), 3.04–3.10 (m, 2H, CH2 and H-8a), 4.09–4.17 (m, 2H, OCH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 15.1, 21.2, 22.6, 26.8, 27.3, 42.0, 53.4, 55.0, 60.5, 64.9, 170.4; MS (ESI) m/z: 198.7 [M + 1]; anal. calcd for C11H19NO2: C, 66.97; H, 9.71; N, 7.10; found: C, 67.28; H, 9.40; N, 6.78.
((8S*,8aS*)-Octahydroindolizin-8-yl)methanol; ((±)-epitashiromine, (±)-10) [32,34,39]

A yellow oil (Rf 0.45, CH2Cl2/MeOH/NH4OH 88:8:4); yield: 53%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.56–1.62 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.65–1.74 (m, 4H, CH2), 1.97–2.12 (m, 5H, CH2), 2.20–2.28 (m, 1H, H-8), 2.94–3.00 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.08–3.14 (m, 1H, N-CH), 3.70–3.75 (m, 1H, OCH2), 4.13–4.19 (m, 1H, OCH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.2, 23.7, 26.3, 30.1, 35.7, 54.0, 54.9, 66.0, 66.8; MS (ESI) m/z: 156.4 [M + 1]; anal. calcd for C9H17NO: C, 69.63; H, 11.04; N 9.02; found: C, 69.30; H, 10.71; N, 8.79.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Hungarian Research Foundation (OTKA No. K100530 and NK81371) and TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0035 for financial support. This paper was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences to L.K.
References
- 1.Michael J P. Nat Prod Rep. 2008;25:139–165. doi: 10.1039/B612166G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brandi A, Cardona F, Cicchi S, Cordero F M, Goti A. Chem – Eur J. 2009;15:7808. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Macchi B, Minutolo A, Grelli S, Cardona F, Cordero F M, Mastino A, Brandi A. Glycobiology. 2010;20:500–506. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwp202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Felpin F X, Lebreton J. Eur J Org Chem. 2003:3693–3712. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200300193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hu X-G, Hunter L. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2013;9:2696–2708. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.9.306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Faria A R, Salvador E L, Correia C R D. J Org Chem. 2002;67:3651–3661. doi: 10.1021/jo016189u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang X-P, Cheng Y, Shi G-F, Kang Z-M. J Org Chem. 2007;72:2212–2215. doi: 10.1021/jo0624290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Trajkovic M, Balanac V, Ferjancic Z, Saicic R N. RSC Adv. 2014;4:53722–53724. doi: 10.1039/C4RA11978A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Davies S G, Fletcher A M, Foster E M, Houlsby I T T, Roberts P M, Schofield T M, Thomson J E. Org Biomol Chem. 2014;12:9223–9235. doi: 10.1039/C4OB01737D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rao N N, Parida B B, Cha J K. Org Lett. 2014;16:6208–6211. doi: 10.1021/ol503136s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim G-W, Jin T, Kim J-S, Park S-H, Lee K-H, Kim S-S, Myeong I-S, Ham W-H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2014;25:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2013.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Du-a-man S, Soorukram D, Kuhakarn C, Tuchinda P, Reutrakul V, Pohmakotr M. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:1708–1715. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201301671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoon H, Cho K S, Sim T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2014;25:497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kauloorkar S V, Jha V, Jogdand G, Kumar P. Org Biomol Chem. 2014;12:4454–4460. doi: 10.1039/c4ob00461b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lingamurthy M, Rajander A, Rao B V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2014;25:860–863. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ortiz G X, Jr, Kang B, Wang Q. J Org Chem. 2014;79:571–581. doi: 10.1021/jo4022666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Suga H, Hashimoto Y, Yasumura S, Takezawa R, Itoh K, Kakehi A. J Org Chem. 2013;78:10840–10852. doi: 10.1021/jo401837d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hanessian S, Soma U, Dorich S, Deschênes-Simard B. Org Lett. 2011;13:1048–1051. doi: 10.1021/ol103094j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Han M-Y, Jia J-Y, Wang W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:784–794. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.11.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh P, Manna S K, Panda G. Tetrahedron. 2014;70:1363–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tiwari D K, Bharadwaj K C, Puranik V G, Tiwari D K. Org Biomol Chem. 2014;12:7389–7396. doi: 10.1039/C4OB00948G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jouanno L-A, Di Mascio V, Tognetti V, Joubert L, Sabot C, Renard P-Y. J Org Chem. 2014;79:1303. doi: 10.1021/jo402729a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McElhinney A D, Marsden S P. Synlett. 2005:2528–2530. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-917072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marsden S P, McElhinney A D. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2008;4:No. 8. doi: 10.1186/1860-5397-4-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bates R W, Boonsombat J. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 2001:654–656. doi: 10.1039/b100407g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Amorde S M, Jewett I T, Martin S F. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:3222–3231. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chiou W-H, Lin Y-H, Chen G-T, Gao Y-K, Tseng Y-C, Kao C-L, Tsai J-C. Chem Commun. 2011;47:3562–3564. doi: 10.1039/c0cc05646d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pohmakotr M, Prateeptongkum S, Chooprayoon S, Tuchinda P, Reutrakul V. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:2339–2347. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bélanger G, Larouche-Gauthier R, Ménard F, Nantel M, Barabé F. J Org Chem. 2006;71:704–712. doi: 10.1021/jo052141v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dieter R K, Watson R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:7725–7728. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)01835-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim S-H, Kim S-I, Lai S, Cha J K. J Org Chem. 1999;64:6771–6775. doi: 10.1021/jo9907383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dieter R K, Chen N, Watson R T. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:3221–3230. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.01.094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.David O, Blot J, Bellec C, Fargeau-Bellassoued M-C, Haviari G, Célérier J-P, Lhommet G, Gramain J-C, Gardette D. J Org Chem. 1999;64:3122–3131. doi: 10.1021/jo982169p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thorat R G, Pansare S V. Eur J Org Chem. 2013:7282–7285. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201301078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cutter A C, Miller I R, Keily J F, Bellingham R K, Light M E, Brown R C D. Org Lett. 2011;13:3988–3991. doi: 10.1021/ol2015048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gage J L, Branchaud B P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:7007–7010. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(97)01638-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Conrad J C, Kong J, Laforteza B N, MacMillan D W C. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:11640–11641. doi: 10.1021/ja9026902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reddy K K S, Rao B V, Raju S S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2011;22:662–668. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Banwell M G, Beck D A S, Smith J A. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:157–159. doi: 10.1039/b312552a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kazi B, Kiss L, Forró E, Fülöp F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:82–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.10.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kiss L, Kazi B, Forró E, Fülöp F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:339–342. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.11.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kiss L, Cherepanova M, Forró E, Fülöp F. Chem – Eur J. 2013;19:2102–2107. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cherepanova M, Kiss L, Fülöp F. Tetrahedron. 2014;70:2515–2522. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.02.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cherepanova M, Kiss L, Forró E, Fülöp F. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:403–409. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201301281. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Brambilla M, Davies S G, Fletcher A M, Roberts P M, Thomson J E. Tetrahedron. 2014;70:204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee M-r, Stahl S S, Gellman S H. Org Lett. 2008;10:5317–5319. doi: 10.1021/ol802274x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fricke Y, Kopp N, Wünsch B. Synthesis. 2010:791–796. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1218622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Malik G, Guinchard X, Crich D. Org Lett. 2012;14:596–599. doi: 10.1021/ol203213f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sousa C A D, Rizzo-Aguiar F, Vale M L C, García-Mera X, Caamaño O, Rodríguez-Borges J E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:1029–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.12.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pérez-Bautista J A, Sosa-Rivadeneyra M, Quintero L, Höpfl H, Tejeda-Dominguez F A, Sartillo-Piscil F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:5572–5574. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.07.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Caputo F, Cattaneo C, Clerici F, Gelmi M L, Pellegrino S. J Org Chem. 2006;71:8467–8472. doi: 10.1021/jo061391o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Robinson A, Thomas G L, Spandl R J, Welch M, Spring D R. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6:2978–2981. doi: 10.1039/b809038f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Forró E, Árva J, Fülöp F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2001;12:643–649. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4166(01)00100-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Palkó M, Benedek G, Forró E, Wéber E, Hänninen M, Sillanpää R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2010;21:957–961. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2010.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]








