Abstract
While it has long been recognized that bile acids are essential for solubilizing lipophilic nutrients in the small intestine, the discovery in 1999 that bile acids serve as ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR opened the floodgates in terms of characterizing their actions as selective signaling molecules. Bile acids act on FXR in ileal enterocytes to induce the expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 15/19, an atypical FGF that functions as a hormone. FGF15/19 subsequently acts on a cell surface receptor complex in hepatocytes to repress bile acid synthesis and gluconeogenesis and to stimulate glycogen and protein synthesis. FGF15/19 also stimulates gallbladder filling. Thus, the bile acid-FXR-FGF15/19 signaling pathway regulates diverse aspects of the postprandial enterohepatic response. Pharmacologically, this endocrine pathway provides exciting new opportunities for treating metabolic disease and bile acid-related disorders such as primary biliary cirrhosis and bile acid diarrhea. Both FXR agonists and FGF19 analogs are currently in clinical trials.
Keywords: nuclear receptor, fibroblast growth factor, ileum, liver, CYP7A1
The important role of bile acids as intestinal detergents for the absorption of dietary lipids has been established for many years. However, the discovery in 1999 of a nuclear receptor for bile acids opened a new chapter in the bile acid field, one in which bile acids function as hormones to regulate diverse physiologic processes [1–3]. Bile acids are now known to signal through two receptors: the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), which is a member of the nuclear receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors [1–3]; and Gpbar1/M-BAR/TGR5, a G protein-coupled receptor [4, 5]. In this review, we will focus on FXR and its downstream effector, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 15/19, and their effects on bile acid homeostasis and metabolism.
Nuclear bile acid receptor, FXR
FXR was originally named based on its weak, non-physiological activation by the terpenoid, farnesol [6]. Subsequent studies showed that FXR is activated by physiological concentrations of bile acids, including the primary bile acids cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid [1–3]. FXR regulates the expression of target genes by binding to DNA response elements, termed farnesoid X response elements (FXREs), as a heterodimer with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (RXR). The consensus FXRE is composed of two copies of the nuclear receptor binding motif, AGGTCA, organized as an inverted repeat and separated by a single nucleotide [7]. Many FXR target genes have been identified in liver and intestine as well as other tissues [8, 9].
The physiologic role of FXR as a bile acid receptor was confirmed in FXR-knockout (KO) mice, which have increased bile acid synthesis and pool size [10]. When challenged with a diet containing cholic acid, FXR-KO mice had severe hepatotoxicity and wasting that did not occur in wild-type mice [11]. FXR-KO mice also had elevated serum cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids, and low density and very low density lipoproteins [11]. Thus, FXR plays a broad role in regulating lipid homeostasis.
FXR-FGF15/19 enterohepatic pathway
FXR is expressed in enterocytes throughout the small intestine and colon [12], where it induces genes such as the ileal acid binding protein and organic solute transporter α/β, which are involved in regulating bile acid homeostasis [13]. Among the genes induced by FXR activation in murine ileum is Fgf15, which encodes an atypical FGF that is secreted into the portal circulation to function as a hormone [14]. FXR binds to a response element located in the second intron of the Fgf15 gene to directly regulate its transcription [14]. Following its induction by bile acids, FGF15 has two prominent effects. First, it circulates to liver, where it inhibits bile acid synthesis by repressing transcription of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (Cyp7a1), which encodes the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the classic bile acid synthetic pathway. FGF15-KO mice have increased CYP7A1 expression and activity and a corresponding increase in bile acid synthesis [14]. Second, FGF15 causes the gallbladder to fill with bile [15]. FGF15-KO mice have a virtually empty gallbladder, even in the fasted state, when the gallbladder is normally full. Notably, injection of FGF15-KO mice with recombinant FGF15 causes a rapid filling of the gallbladder without stimulating bile flow. This effect is mediated in part via relaxation of the gallbladder smooth muscle [15]. Thus, FGF15 released from the small intestine plays a crucial role in coordinating bile acid homeostasis in other tissues including the liver and gallbladder. In liver, FGF15 acts through a cell surface receptor complex composed of the FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4), which has tyrosine kinase activity, and βKlotho, a single transmembrane protein. Both the FGFR4-KO and βKlotho-KO mice phenocopy the FGF15-KO mice in having increased Cyp7a1 expression and small gallbladders [16, 17].
The human ortholog of FGF15 is FGF19. At the time they were cloned, the fact that FGF15 and FGF19 share only 53% amino acid identity left the nature of their relationship in question, hence their different names [18, 19]. However, there is now definitive evidence that FGF15 and FGF19 are orthologous proteins. For this reason, we refer to the hormone as FGF15/19 unless referring to a specific ortholog. The genes for human, mouse, and zebrafish FGF15/19 are on syntenic regions of the genomes [20], and the FXR binding site is conserved [14, 21]. Consistent with this latter finding, FGF19 expression in humans is also regulated by bile acids. In humans, serum FGF19 levels have a diurnal rhythm with peaks occurring 90–120 minutes after the postprandial release of bile acids [22]. This peak precedes the repression of bile acid synthesis. Conversely, FGF19 levels decreased in subjects administered the bile acid sequestrant, cholestyramine [22]. Patients with bile acid diarrhea, who overproduce bile acids, also have lower circulating FGF19 levels [23]. Recently, an FGF19 analog was shown to efficiently repress bile acid synthesis in healthy volunteers taking part in a phase 1 clinical study [24]. Thus, FGF19 is induced by FXR and represses bile acid synthesis in humans.
Mechanism of CYP7A1 repression
Previous studies showed that the feedback regulation of CYP7A1 by bile acids is mediated by a nuclear receptor signaling cascade involving FXR and small heterodimer partner (SHP), an atypical orphan nuclear receptor lacking a DNA binding domain that functions as a potent transcriptional repressor [25, 26]. In liver, transcription of the SHP gene is induced by bile acids via FXR. SHP, in turn, binds to the CYP7A1 promoter to repress gene transcription through mechanisms that involve recruitment of various proteins, including the mSin3A-Swi/Snf complex, G9a methyltransferase, and the corepressor subunit GPS2 [27–29]. Mice lacking SHP have increased basal Cyp7a1 expression [30, 31]. SHP is recruited to the Cyp7a1 gene via interactions with the nuclear receptors LRH-1 and HNF4α, which both bind to a promoter region that is important for bile acid-mediated repression [25, 26, 32, 33]. Studies with liver-specific knockout mice showed that either LRH-1 or HNF4α is capable of recruiting SHP to the Cyp7a1 promoter [34].
Notably, SHP is required for FGF15/19 to efficiently repress bile acid synthesis. Mice lacking SHP are refractory to the inhibitory effects of either FXR agonists or FGF15/19 on Cyp7a1 expression [14, 34]. HNF4α and LRH-1 induce active transcription histone marks on the Cyp7a1 promoter that are reversed by FGF19 in a SHP-dependent manner [34]. FGF19 does not change SHP protein levels or its localization on the Cyp7a1 gene promoter, suggesting that FGF19 stimulates the recruitment of other factors to the SHP complex [34]. Since basal Fgf15 expression in intestine is low, its induction is required for repression of Cyp7a1 [14]. In contrast, basal expression of Shp in liver is relatively high. Thus, further induction of Shp in liver by FXR contributes—to but is not essential for—repression of Cyp7a1. This model is borne out by studies with intestine- and liver-specific FXR-KO mice: elimination of FXR in intestine disrupts FXR-mediated suppression of Cyp7a1 whereas elimination of FXR in liver does not [35].
Additional metabolic actions of FXR and FGF15/19
The biological actions of FXR extend well beyond the regulation of bile acid homeostasis [8, 9, 36]. As mentioned above, FXR exerts important effects on lipoproteins and lipid metabolism. Activation of FXR with either bile acids or synthetic FXR agonists decreases hepatic and circulating triglyceride concentrations [37, 38]. FXR also regulates glucose homeostasis. FXR-KO mice are insulin resistant and glucose intolerant [38–40]. Conversely, FXR activation improves insulin sensitivity and glycemia in rodent models of metabolic disease. These effects are due in part to FXR-mediated repression of hepatic gluconeogenesis and induction of hepatic glycogen synthesis [38–40].
Likewise, FGF15/19 has broad biological effects. Like insulin, FGF15/19 levels rise following a meal [22], and it stimulates hepatic protein and glycogen synthesis by acting on the FGFR4/βKlotho receptor complex in hepatocytes [41]. However, peak blood levels of FGF15/19 occur well after those of insulin, and its effects are mediated not by the AKT/PI3K signaling cascade but rather through an ERK1/2 pathway that activates components of the protein translation machinery and stimulates glycogen synthase activity [41]. FGF19 also represses gluconeogenesis through a mechanism involving the dephosphorylation and inactivation of the transcription factors CREB and FoxO1 [42, 43], which are both positive regulators of gluconeogenic genes. Thus, FGF15/19 acts subsequent to insulin to regulate diverse aspects of the postprandial response.
Pharmacologically, FGF15/19 also regulates energy expenditure and insulin sensitivity. Transgenic mice overexpressing FGF19 under the control of the muscle-specific myosin light chain promoter weighed less that their wild-type littermates [44]. Although FGF19-transgenic mice had increased food intake, they also had a higher metabolic rate. When challenged with a high fat diet, FGF19-transgenic mice remained lean and had decreased muscle and liver triglyceride levels. These mice also had lower serum glucose and insulin levels, improved glucose tolerance and improved insulin sensitivity compared to wild-type littermates [44]. Similar effects were seen after administration of recombinant human FGF19 to mice maintained on a high fat diet. FGF19 improved glucose tolerance and decreased serum insulin and triglycerides [45]. These data suggest FGF19 acts as an insulin sensitizer.
A potential drawback of administering FGF19 as an anti-diabetes drug is that it promotes liver growth at pharmacologic concentrations. FGF19 has been implicated in liver tumorigenesis [46], and chronic exposure to FGF19 causes hepatocellular carcinoma in mice [47]. Notably, however, variants of FGF19 have been developed that are non-tumorigenic but still retain the ability to regulate bile acid metabolism [48]. One of these variants was shown to suppress bile acid synthesis in humans, providing direct evidence that FGF19 regulates bile acid homeostasis in humans [24].
Recent studies show that FGF15/19 can regulate metabolism by acting on the brain. Intracerebroventricular injection of FGF19 activated ERK1/2 in the hypothalamus of ob/ob mice and increased energy expenditure and improved glycemia in mouse and rat models of obesity [45, 49–51]. Interestingly, FGF19 administered centrally increased glucose disposal in ob/ob mice via an insulin-independent mechanism [51]. It remains to be determined precisely where and how FGF15/19 acts on the brain to regulate metabolism and whether FGF15/19 crosses the blood-brain barrier at physiologic concentrations to regulate these processes.
Closing comments
The past 15 years have witnessed explosive growth in our understanding of bile acids as signaling molecules. Acting as hormones themselves and as inducers of FGF15/19, bile acids regulate diverse facets of hepatic metabolism ranging from their own synthesis to protein and carbohydrate homeostasis. Pharmacologically, FXR agonists and FGF15/19 exert profound effects on metabolism, including effects on insulin sensitivity and energy expenditure. Remarkably, both FXR agonists and FGF19 analogs are already in clinical trials for treating various enterohepatic disorders including primary biliary cirrhosis, bile acid diarrhea and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Thus, the future looks bright for harnessing the FXR-FGF15/19 pathway for treating human disease.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants DK067158 (SAK and DJM), Robert A. Welch Foundation grants I-1588 (SAK) and I-1275 (DJM), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (DJM).
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
S.A.K. owns stock in Intercept Pharmaceuticals.
References
- 1.Makishima M, Okamoto AY, Repa JJ, Tu H, Learned RM, Luk A, Hull MV, Lustig KD, Mangelsdorf DJ, Shan B. Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids. Science. 1999;284:1362–5. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Bledsoe RK, Chandra G, Consler TG, Kliewer SA, Stimmel JB, Willson TM, Zavacki AM, Moore DD, Lehmann JM. Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor. Science. 1999;284:1365–8. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang H, Chen J, Hollister K, Sowers LC, Forman BM. Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR. Mol Cell. 1999;3:543–53. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80348-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawamata Y, Fujii R, Hosoya M, Harada M, Yoshida H, Miwa M, Fukusumi S, Habata Y, Itoh T, Shintani Y, Hinuma S, Fujisawa Y, Fujino M. A G protein-coupled receptor responsive to bile acids. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:9435–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209706200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maruyama T, Miyamoto Y, Nakamura T, Tamai Y, Okada H, Sugiyama E, Itadani H, Tanaka K. Identification of membrane-type receptor for bile acids (M-BAR) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;298:714–9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02550-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Forman BM, Goode E, Chen J, Oro AE, Bradley DJ, Perlmann T, Noonan DJ, Burka LT, McMorris T, Lamph WW, Evans RM, Weinberger C. Identification of a nuclear receptor that is activated by farnesol metabolites. Cell. 1995;81:687–93. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90530-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Laffitte BA, Kast HR, Nguyen CM, Zavacki AM, Moore DD, Edwards PA. Identification of the DNA binding specificity and potential target genes for the farnesoid X-activated receptor. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:10638–47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Matsubara T, Li F, Gonzalez FJ. FXR signaling in the enterohepatic system. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;368:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calkin AC, Tontonoz P. Transcriptional integration of metabolism by the nuclear sterol-activated receptors LXR and FXR. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:213–24. doi: 10.1038/nrm3312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kok T, Hulzebos CV, Wolters H, Havinga R, Agellon LB, Stellaard F, Shan B, Schwarz M, Kuipers F. Enterohepatic circulation of bile salts in farnesoid X receptor-deficient mice: efficient intestinal bile salt absorption in the absence of ileal bile acid-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:41930–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306309200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sinal CJ, Tohkin M, Miyata M, Ward JM, Lambert G, Gonzalez FJ. Targeted disruption of the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR impairs bile acid and lipid homeostasis. Cell. 2000;102:731–44. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Inagaki T, Moschetta A, Lee YK, Peng L, Zhao G, Downes M, Yu RT, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Repa JJ, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3920–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509592103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dawson PA, Lan T, Rao A. Bile acid transporters. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:2340–57. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R900012-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Inagaki T, Choi M, Moschetta A, Peng L, Cummins CL, McDonald JG, Luo G, Jones SA, Goodwin B, Richardson JA, Gerard RD, Repa JJ, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA. Fibroblast growth factor 15 functions as an enterohepatic signal to regulate bile acid homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2005;2:217–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Choi M, Moschetta A, Bookout AL, Peng L, Umetani M, Holmstrom SR, Suino-Powell K, Xu HE, Richardson JA, Gerard RD, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA. Identification of a hormonal basis for gallbladder filling. Nat Med. 2006;12:1253–5. doi: 10.1038/nm1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yu C, Wang F, Kan M, Jin C, Jones RB, Weinstein M, Deng CX, McKeehan WL. Elevated cholesterol metabolism and bile acid synthesis in mice lacking membrane tyrosine kinase receptor FGFR4. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:15482–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.20.15482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ito S, Fujimori T, Furuya A, Satoh J, Nabeshima Y. Impaired negative feedback suppression of bile acid synthesis in mice lacking betaKlotho. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2202–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI23076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McWhirter JR, Goulding M, Weiner JA, Chun J, Murre C. A novel fibroblast growth factor gene expressed in the developing nervous system is a downstream target of the chimeric homeodomain oncoprotein E2A-Pbx1. Development. 1997;124:3221–32. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.17.3221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nishimura T, Utsunomiya Y, Hoshikawa M, Ohuchi H, Itoh N. Structure and expression of a novel human FGF, FGF-19, expressed in the fetal brain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1444:148–51. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(98)00255-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Katoh M. Evolutionary conservation of CCND1-ORAOV1-FGF19-FGF4 locus from zebrafish to human. Int J Mol Med. 2003;12:45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Holt JA, Luo G, Billin AN, Bisi J, McNeill YY, Kozarsky KF, Donahee M, Wang DY, Mansfield TA, Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, Jones SA. Definition of a novel growth factor-dependent signal cascade for the suppression of bile acid biosynthesis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1581–91. doi: 10.1101/gad.1083503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lundasen T, Galman C, Angelin B, Rudling M. Circulating intestinal fibroblast growth factor 19 has a pronounced diurnal variation and modulates hepatic bile acid synthesis in man. J Intern Med. 2006;260:530–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Walters JR, Tasleem AM, Omer OS, Brydon WG, Dew T, le Roux CW. A new mechanism for bile acid diarrhea: defective feedback inhibition of bile acid biosynthesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1189–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Luo J, Ko B, Elliott M, Zhou M, Lindhout DA, Phung V, To C, Learned RM, Tian H, DePaoli AM, Ling L. A nontumorigenic variant of FGF19 treats cholestatic liver diseases. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:247ra100. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goodwin B, Jones SA, Price RR, Watson MA, McKee DD, Moore LB, Galardi C, Wilson JG, Lewis MC, Roth ME, Maloney PR, Willson TM, Kliewer SA. A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol Cell. 2000;6:517–26. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lu TT, Makishima M, Repa JJ, Schoonjans K, Kerr TA, Auwerx J, Mangelsdorf DJ. Molecular basis for feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis by nuclear receptors. Mol Cell. 2000;6:507–15. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00050-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fang S, Miao J, Xiang L, Ponugoti B, Treuter E, Kemper JK. Coordinated recruitment of histone methyltransferase G9a and other chromatin-modifying enzymes in SHP-mediated regulation of hepatic bile acid metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:1407–24. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00944-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kemper JK, Kim H, Miao J, Bhalla S, Bae Y. Role of an mSin3A-Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex in the feedback repression of bile acid biosynthesis by SHP. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:7707–19. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7707-7719.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanyal S, Bavner A, Haroniti A, Nilsson LM, Lundasen T, Rehnmark S, Witt MR, Einarsson C, Talianidis I, Gustafsson JA, Treuter E. Involvement of corepressor complex subunit GPS2 in transcriptional pathways governing human bile acid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15665–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706736104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kerr TA, Saeki S, Schneider M, Schaefer K, Berdy S, Redder T, Shan B, Russell DW, Schwarz M. Loss of nuclear receptor SHP impairs but does not eliminate negative feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis. Dev Cell. 2002;2:713–20. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang L, Lee YK, Bundman D, Han Y, Thevananther S, Kim CS, Chua SS, Wei P, Heyman RA, Karin M, Moore DD. Redundant pathways for negative feedback regulation of bile acid production. Dev Cell. 2002;2:721–31. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00187-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chiang JY, Stroup D. Identification and characterization of a putative bile acid-responsive element in cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase gene promoter. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:17502–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.De Fabiani E, Mitro N, Anzulovich AC, Pinelli A, Galli G, Crestani M. The negative effects of bile acids and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on the transcription of cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) converge to hepatic nuclear factor-4: a novel mechanism of feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis mediated by nuclear receptors. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:30708–16. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103270200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kir S, Zhang Y, Gerard RD, Kliewer SA, Mangelsdorf DJ. Nuclear receptors HNF4alpha and LRH-1 cooperate in regulating Cyp7a1 in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:41334–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.421834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim I, Ahn SH, Inagaki T, Choi M, Ito S, Guo GL, Kliewer SA, Gonzalez FJ. Differential regulation of bile acid homeostasis by the farnesoid X receptor in liver and intestine. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:2664–72. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700330-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.de Aguiar Vallim TQ, Tarling EJ, Edwards PA. Pleiotropic roles of bile acids in metabolism. Cell Metab. 2013;17:657–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Watanabe M, Houten SM, Wang L, Moschetta A, Mangelsdorf DJ, Heyman RA, Moore DD, Auwerx J. Bile acids lower triglyceride levels via a pathway involving FXR, SHP, and SREBP-1c. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1408–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI21025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang Y, Lee FY, Barrera G, Lee H, Vales C, Gonzalez FJ, Willson TM, Edwards PA. Activation of the nuclear receptor FXR improves hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:1006–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506982103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cariou B, van Harmelen K, Duran-Sandoval D, van Dijk TH, Grefhorst A, Abdelkarim M, Caron S, Torpier G, Fruchart JC, Gonzalez FJ, Kuipers F, Staels B. The farnesoid X receptor modulates adiposity and peripheral insulin sensitivity in mice. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:11039–49. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510258200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ma K, Saha PK, Chan L, Moore DD. Farnesoid X receptor is essential for normal glucose homeostasis. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1102–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI25604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kir S, Beddow SA, Samuel VT, Miller P, Previs SF, Suino-Powell K, Xu HE, Shulman GI, Kliewer SA, Mangelsdorf DJ. FGF19 as a postprandial, insulin-independent activator of hepatic protein and glycogen synthesis. Science. 2011;331:1621–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1198363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Potthoff MJ, Boney-Montoya J, Choi M, He T, Sunny NE, Satapati S, Suino-Powell K, Xu HE, Gerard RD, Finck BN, Burgess SC, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA. FGF15/19 Regulates Hepatic Glucose Metabolism by Inhibiting the CREB-PGC-1alpha Pathway. Cell Metab. 2011;13:729–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shin DJ, Osborne TF. FGF15/FGFR4 integrates growth factor signaling with hepatic bile acid metabolism and insulin action. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11110–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808747200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tomlinson E, Fu L, John L, Hultgren B, Huang X, Renz M, Stephan JP, Tsai SP, Powell-Braxton L, French D, Stewart TA. Transgenic mice expressing human fibroblast growth factor-19 display increased metabolic rate and decreased adiposity. Endocrinology. 2002;143:1741–7. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.5.8850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fu L, John LM, Adams SH, Yu XX, Tomlinson E, Renz M, Williams PM, Soriano R, Corpuz R, Moffat B, Vandlen R, Simmons L, Foster J, Stephan JP, Tsai SP, Stewart TA. Fibroblast growth factor 19 increases metabolic rate and reverses dietary and leptin-deficient diabetes. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2594–603. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sawey ET, Chanrion M, Cai C, Wu G, Zhang J, Zender L, Zhao A, Busuttil RW, Yee H, Stein L, French DM, Finn RS, Lowe SW, Powers S. Identification of a therapeutic strategy targeting amplified FGF19 in liver cancer by Oncogenomic screening. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:347–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nicholes K, Guillet S, Tomlinson E, Hillan K, Wright B, Frantz GD, Pham TA, Dillard-Telm L, Tsai SP, Stephan JP, Stinson J, Stewart T, French DM. A mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma: ectopic expression of fibroblast growth factor 19 in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:2295–307. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61177-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhou M, Wang X, Phung V, Lindhout DA, Mondal K, Hsu JY, Yang H, Humphrey M, Ding X, Arora T, Learned RM, DePaoli AM, Tian H, Ling L. Separating Tumorigenicity from Bile Acid Regulatory Activity for Endocrine Hormone FGF19. Cancer research. 2014;74:3306–16. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Marcelin G, Jo YH, Li X, Schwartz GJ, Zhang Y, Dun NJ, Lyu RM, Blouet C, Chang JK, Chua S., Jr Central action of FGF19 reduces hypothalamic AGRP/NPY neuron activity and improves glucose metabolism. Molecular metabolism. 2014;3:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ryan KK, Kohli R, Gutierrez-Aguilar R, Gaitonde SG, Woods SC, Seeley RJ. Fibroblast growth factor-19 action in the brain reduces food intake and body weight and improves glucose tolerance in male rats. Endocrinology. 2013;154:9–15. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Morton GJ, Matsen ME, Bracy DP, Meek TH, Nguyen HT, Stefanovski D, Bergman RN, Wasserman DH, Schwartz MW. FGF19 action in the brain induces insulin-independent glucose lowering. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4799–808. doi: 10.1172/JCI70710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]