Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2015 May 26;112(23):7273–7278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500553112

Pheromone killing of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583 by native commensal strains

Michael S Gilmore a,b,1, Marcus Rauch a,b,2,3, Matthew M Ramsey a,b,2,4, Paul R Himes a,b,5, Sriram Varahan c, Janet M Manson a,b,6, Francois Lebreton a,b, Lynn Ernest Hancock c
PMCID: PMC4466700  PMID: 26039987

Significance

Multidrug-resistant enterococci are leading causes of hospital infection. The antibiotic-perturbed patient gut serves as a staging ground—small numbers of resistant hospital strains colonize and then, greatly amplify in the colon. Little is known of the colonization principles involved—whether hospital strains are competitive or noncompetitive with commensal enterococci or whether mobile elements comprising over 25% of the genome of the former impose significant fitness costs. We unexpectedly found that the prototype vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis strain V583 was actively killed by fecal organisms, and we traced that to pheromone production by commensal enterococci that trigger lethal mobile element cross-talk. This work highlights the importance of maintaining commensal enterococci in the gut of the hospitalized patient.

Keywords: Enterococcus, vancomycin, antibiotics, resistance, fitness cost

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis possess numerous mobile elements that encode virulence and antibiotic resistance traits as well as new metabolic pathways, often constituting over one-quarter of the genome. It was of interest to determine how this large accretion of mobile elements affects competitive growth in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract consortium. We unexpectedly observed that the prototype clinical isolate strain V583 was actively killed by GI tract flora, whereas commensal enterococci flourished. It was found that killing of V583 resulted from lethal cross-talk between accumulated mobile elements and that this cross-talk was induced by a heptapeptide pheromone produced by native E. faecalis present in the fecal consortium. These results highlight two important aspects of the evolution of multidrug-resistant enterococci: (i) the accretion of mobile elements in E. faecalis V583 renders it incompatible with commensal strains, and (ii) because of this incompatibility, multidrug-resistant strains sharing features found in V583 cannot coexist with commensal strains. The accumulation of mobile elements in hospital isolates of enterococci can include those that are inherently incompatible with native flora, highlighting the importance of maintaining commensal populations as means of preventing colonization and subsequent infection by multidrug-resistant strains.


The human gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a highly competitive environment colonized by a diverse microbial population (1). Diversity is shaped by factors such as vertical transmission, immune selection, diet, and other influences, including antibiotic therapy (24). Enterococci are ancient members of GI tract consortia of everything from humans to insects (57). Commensal enterococci have reduced genomes (∼2.7 Mb) (8) and despite their success in this highly competitive environment, possess auxotrophies for amino acids, vitamins, and other micronutrients (9). Paralleling the broad application of antibiotics in healthcare and animal husbandry, multidrug-resistant (MDR) enterococci emerged as leading causes of hospital infection (7, 10, 11). Approximately one-third are now vancomycin-resistant (VRE) (6).

Genomes of pathogenic MDR enterococci are replete with mobile genetic elements (8, 11). Enterococcus faecalis V583, the first VRE Enterococcus isolated in the United States (12), is additionally resistant to high levels of aminoglycosides, macrolides, lincosamides, and streptograms B and has an enlarged 3.36-Mb genome that includes six plasmids or plasmid-like elements (three integrated into the chromosome), seven prophages, and numerous other insertions (ISs), including a 138-kb pathogenicity island (PAI), transposons, and 38 IS elements (13, 14). This accumulation contrasts sharply with OG1RF, a well-characterized, commensal-like oral isolate (15, 16) that has a 2.7-Mb genome containing only a prophage previously identified as being ubiquitous in the species (17) and a remnant of a nonantibiotic resistance transposon of unknown functionality (18). Hospital-adapted MDR E. faecalis isolates generally lack a functional clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats locus, which seems to have facilitated mobile element accretion (19).

MDR enterococci colonize the patient after perturbation of the native flora by antibiotic treatment, including therapies with little or no antienterococcal activity (6, 2022). The E. faecalis V583 PAI and other mobile elements confer the ability to produce new virulence factors, produce colonization traits, and use novel metabolites (14). This observation raises the question as to whether pathogenic MDR enterococci occupy the same microniche as native commensal enterococci (20).

At minimum, the simple maintenance of ∼600 kb of foreign DNA on mobile elements in V583 (13) would be predicted to impose a burden in a highly competitive environment where there is no offsetting antibiotic selection. We hypothesized that some or most of these mobile elements were obtained in an uncompetitive antibiotic-affected environment, resulting in little penalty for an accompanying fitness cost. If true, the large complement of mobile DNA in V583 could compromise its ability to proliferate in a competitive, native GI tract consortium and possibly, fundamentally alter its interaction with other members of that consortium. To determine whether E. faecalis V583 behaved in ways different from a commensal strain (using for comparison the commensal-like nonantibiotic-resistant OG1), we compared their growth in the presence of healthy human fecal flora under a number of conditions. Not only did the healthy flora inhibit V583 (and not OG1), but the fecal consortium actively killed the MDR strain. With a view toward limiting the outgrowth of VRE in the GI tract of hospitalized patients, we determined the basis for this antagonism.

Results

MDR E. faecalis V583 Is Killed When Cultured with Healthy Human Flora.

To determine whether MDR V583 was compromised in its ability to compete among healthy human GI tract flora, we compared its growth with that of model commensal OG1X [a sister clone of OG1RF that possesses a selectable streptomycin resistance marker (15)]. To simulate environmental cues and carbon sources that may occur in the GI tract (23), we developed an M9 minimal salts-based medium (24) that included 1% crude hog gastric mucin (HGM9; Sigma). Fig. 1 shows that, in HGM9 monoculture, either V583 (Fig. 1A) or OG1X proliferates (Fig. 1B). However, healthy flora derived from pooled human fecal samples imposed competitive limitation on each one.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Pathogenic but not commensal E. faecalis are killed in fecal consortia. (A) E. faecalis strain V583 and (B) OG1X after growth in monoculture or with added healthy human fecal flora were enumerated on Bile Esculin Azide agar containing antibiotics as appropriate. All cultures were performed in triplicate, and error bars represent the SD of the mean. NANA, N-acetylneuraminic acid.

To probe the relationship between the E. faecalis being compared and members of the fecal consortium, various carbohydrates were added, including some utilizable by E. faecalis and others utilizable only by members of the fecal consortium. These carbohydrates included N-acetylneuraminic acid, d-fucose, d-galactosamine, d-panose, d-galactose, GalNAc, and as a control, d-glucose. To our surprise, we observed the active, selective killing of MDR V583 but not OG1X in HGM9 to which glucose, N-acetylgalactosamine, galactose, or panose had been added (Fig. 1). This killing was observed, despite the fact that V583 grew well in monoculture in the presence of these carbon sources. In contrast, OG1X was observed to grow under all coculture conditions (Fig. 1B). This result was interpreted to mean that glucose, GalNAc, galactose, and panose increased the abundance of flora antagonistic to V583 or that these sugars selectively altered the metabolism of V583 (and not OG1X), rendering it susceptible to killing.

Loss of Commensal Enterococci from the Fecal Consortium Correlates with Loss of V583 Killing.

In an attempt to enrich or deplete a putative V583 antagonist from the fecal consortium, we pretreated the consortium for 24 h with either erythromycin or tetracycline (Fig. 2). Erythromycin eliminated the galactose-enhanced V583 antagonism (Fig. 2A), which correlated with the loss of native enterococci from the fecal consortium (Fig. 2B). In contrast, V583 killing by the fecal consortium was unaffected and even enhanced, such that it no longer required galactose augmentation by tetracycline treatment (Fig. 2C), conditions that also enriched the native enterococci in the fecal consortium (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Commensal enterococci kill MDR E. faecalis V583. (A) Preculture of the fecal consortium in varying levels of erythromycin eliminated the ability of the fecal consortium to kill V583. (B) Erythromycin pretreatment of the fecal consortium also eliminated native enterococci from the consortium, whereas Enterobacteriaceae remained relatively unchanged. (C) Tetracycline pretreatment of the fecal consortium does not eliminate V583 killing and enhances killing, even in the absence of added galactose. (D) Tetracycline pretreatment of the fecal consortium enriched the presence of native enterococci in the consortium and inhibited Enterobacteriaceae, showing that they are not involved in V583 elimination and suggesting that the former may be involved. (E) Three commensal E. faecalis strains (OG1RF, FA2-2, and Pan7; isolated from the healthy fecal consortium) induce zones of clearing in lawns of V583. (F) Deletion of rpoN in the chromosome of V583 does not affect susceptibility to killing by commensal enterococci, such as Pan7.

Because measures that inhibit native enterococci in the flora reduce V583 inhibition and measures that increase native enterococcal numbers enhance V583 inhibition and because bacteriocin production by enterococci is common and well-known (25), we selectively plated the GI tract flora onto Bile Esculin Azide agar with tetracycline to isolate implicated, potentially bacteriocin-producing, tetracycline-resistant enterococcal strain(s) resident within the consortium. The colonies obtained were uniform, and a representative colony was chosen for additional study. It was found by 16S sequencing to be E. faecalis and termed strain Pan7. Pan7 and as controls, the well-characterized E. faecalis laboratory strains OG1X (15) and FA2-2 (26) [sequenced plasmid-free strains that represent diverse points across the species phylogeny (17); both were not previously known to express bacteriocin activity] were spotted onto soft agar lawns of V583. Fig. 2E shows zones of inhibition around Pan7 and surprisingly, controls as well. If the V583 inhibition observed was bacteriocin-dependent, it was because of a previously unreported activity expressed by all E. faecalis strains tested. E. faecalis susceptibility to class IIa bacteriocins involves RpoN-dependent expression of a mannose phosphotransferase system operon (27, 28). To determine whether V583 sensitivity to E. faecalis inhibition was RpoN-dependent, V583ΔrpoN (29) was tested for resistance to Pan7-mediated inhibition. It was observed to be as sensitive as WT V583 (Fig. 2F), indicating that susceptibility was unrelated to the RpoN-dependent mechanism.

Genetic Basis for V583 Susceptibility to Killing.

To determine why V583 was inhibited by commensal E. faecalis but OG1RF and other strains were not, we examined differences between their genomes. As noted, V583 harbors ∼600 kb mobile element DNA that is absent from OG1RF (16, 18). The largest V583 mobile element is the 138-kb PAI (13, 14). We recently reported the generation of OG1RF/V583 hybrids possessing from 285 to 858 kb of V583 chromosomal DNA, including the PAI and flanking sequences that encompass it (30), in the OG1RF background. To test whether susceptibility to killing was encoded by the PAI or the considerable length of V583 sequence on either side, E. faecalis Pan7 was spotted onto soft agar lawns containing V583 or hybrids Tc3 (an OG1RF hybrid possessing the V583 PAI plus 147 kb of additional flanking V583 sequence) or Tc12 (an OG1RF hybrid that harbors the PAI plus an additional 720 kb of flanking V583 genome sequence) (30). As shown in Fig. 3A, neither the PAI nor the large portions of V583 chromosomal DNA surrounding it confer sensitivity to Pan7-mediated killing.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Both killing and susceptibility to killing relate to the presence of pTEF2. (A) Zone of inhibition around E. faecalis Pan7 on V583 but not lawns of OG1RF/V583 hybrids containing the 138-kb V583 PAI and 147- (Tc3) or 720-kb (Tc12) additional flanking V583 chromosomal DNA in the OG1RF background. (B) Killing by fecal isolate Pan7 requires the presence of pTEF2 in the genetic background provided by the plasmid-cured V583 derivative, strain V19. A second pheromone-responsive plasmid present in V583, pTEF1, does not render V19 susceptible to killing. (C) In addition to conferring susceptibility to killing in V19, pTEF2 but not pTEF1, when transferred into commensal strain Pan7, inhibits its ability to kill V583. (D) Moreover, V19 (V583 cured of plasmids) becomes capable of killing V583, but that ability is lost on reacquisition of pTEF2.

Other mobile elements unique to V583 include its plasmids. A plasmid-cured derivative, V19 (31), was tested. Unlike V583, V19 grew well in coculture with Pan7 (Fig. 3B). This result implicated the involvement of one or more plasmids in the V583 susceptibility phenotype. Therefore, plasmids pTEF1 and pTEF2 [using pTEF2Spc (30) to provide a selectable spectinomycin resistance marker] were reintroduced into V19 (or as a control, introduced into OG1RF). V19(pTEF1) did not show susceptibility to coculture-mediated inhibition, but V19(pTEF2Spc) was found to be highly susceptible (Fig. 3B).

Whereas OG1RF and Pan7 were able to kill V583 or V19(pTEF2), transconjugants OG1RF(pTEF2) and Pan7(pTEF2) had lost the ability to induce killing (Fig. 3C). The plasmid acquisition-dependent loss of effector/killing activity was reminiscent of the known plasmid acquisition-associated loss of pheromone production by E. faecalis (3234). If pTEF2 suppressed expression of the killing factor in a manner analogous to suppression of pheromone production in its host, then it stood to reason that the plasmid-free variant of V583 lacking pTEF2, strain V19, itself might now be capable of killing V583. We found that this was, in fact, the case (Fig. 3D). Interestingly, unlike the V19(pTEF2) transconjugant, OG1RF(pTEF2) and Pan7(pTEF2) remained resistant to killing (SI Materials and Methods and Fig. S1). This observation suggested that pTEF2 contributed to susceptibility but by itself, was insufficient to completely confer the susceptible phenotype.

pTEF2-Dependent Killing Is Mediated by a Pheromone.

Enterococcal pheromones are generated by processing and release of short lipoprotein signal peptide fragments (33, 35). One step in the processing is mediated by membrane metalloprotease Eep (35). If pheromone production by Pan7 and other commensal E. faecalis was involved in killing, then an eep mutant should be defective as an effector/killing strain. In fact, E. faecalis FA2-2Δeep (36) showed partially diminished killing of V583 (Fig. 4A). In a screen of mariner IS mutants in FA2-2 for loss of killing activity, an additional mutant was found that possessed a transposon IS in ORF EF0688 as recently reported (37). This mutant was even more defective in killing than the eep mutant, suggesting that the putative ATP binding cassette transporter was involved in the pheromone production pathway. Because ef0688 and ef0689 were predicted to reside on the same transcript, a specific deletion of reading frames EF0688 and EF0689 was generated, FA2-2ΔpptAB, and verified as having a more than fivefold decrease in killing activity (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

V583 killing is mediated by production of pheromone cOB1 by commensal strains. (A) WT plasmid-free strain FA2-2 is capable of killing V583. This ability is reduced in a mutant strain defective in a membrane protease involved in processing lipoprotein signal peptides into pheromones (eep). It is nearly completely eliminated in a mutant lacking a new putative ATP binding cassette transporter encoded by pptAB (37). FA2-2, in which the gene encoding the lipoprotein that gives rise to pheromone cOB1, ef2496, is deleted, is no longer able to kill V583. This ability is restored in revertant FA2-2Ωef2496. Deleting putative pheromone receptor traC2 from pTEF2 in V583 eliminates it susceptibility to killing, further implicating a pheromone. (B) Purified cOB1 pheromone (VAVLVLGA) specifically inhibits V583 [with an MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of 25 pM] but not its plasmid cured derivative V19. Of 81 pheromone peptides tested, only 2 others showed detectable activity with MICs ∼106-fold higher than the MIC of cOB1. Susceptibility to pheromone killing was restored in V19 by the return of pTEF2. (Inset) Resistant V19(pTEF2) mutants, such as V19(pTEF2)PR, were readily obtained in the zones of clearing in lawns exposed to cOB1.

The known pheromone receptors TraC and PrgZ, which are encoded on pheromone-responsive plasmids pAD1 (38) and pCF10 (39), specifically bind and facilitate pheromone uptake (40). A homolog was identified by BLASTP (41) on pTEF2 EFB0004 (traC-2)]. To test its role in conferring the susceptibility phenotype, we constructed an in-frame deletion of traC-2 in pTEF2 in V583. As predicted, the traC-2 null mutant showed decreased susceptibility to Pan7 killing (Fig. 4A), further implicating pheromones.

Identification of the Effector Pheromone.

To identify the hypothetical pheromone responsible for killing, we developed a library of synthetic peptides corresponding to all predicted pheromone sequences inferred from the E. faecalis genome sequence (13). Pheromone peptides are derived from the seven to nine amino acids preceding the signal peptide cleavage site cysteine of lipoproteins (35, 42). Based on the V583 genome (13), 81 oligopeptides inferred from lipoprotein leader sequences were synthesized (Table S1) and tested for inhibition of V583. Three inhibited V583 and also, V19 in a pTEF2-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). One in particular (NH3-VAVLVLGA-COOH) possessed activity in picomolar concentrations, being >106-fold more active than the only other two and showing inhibitory activity. This highly active peptide matched a pheromone previously identified as cOB1 (43). To confirm that cOB1 was responsible for inhibition of V583, the sequence was scrambled, retested, and found to have lost all inhibitory activity (Table S1). To confirm that cOB1 production by the effector strain was responsible for killing, the precursor lipoprotein encoding cOB1, ef2496, was deleted from the chromosome of E. faecalis FA2-2. As predicted, FA2-2Δef2496 lost the ability to inhibit V583 (Fig. 4A), and the inhibitory phenotype was restored by repair of the ef2496 reading frame, (Fig. 4A), proving that cOB1 production by the effector was necessary and sufficient to mediate V583 killing.

Identification of the Second V583 Locus Required for the Susceptible Phenotype.

Identification of a heptapeptide that inhibited V583 gave us a tool to isolate cOB1-resistant mutants of V583. To ensure that resistance did not derive from the simple curing of pTEF2, a chloramphenicol-resistant derivative of pTEF2 (pTEF2Cm) (30) was introduced into plasmid-cured strain V19. As shown in Fig. 4B, cOB1-resistant mutants, selected in the presence of 15 µg/mL chloramphenicol, occurred at an unexpectedly high frequency of 2.4 × 10−6. One arbitrarily selected mutant, V19(pTEF2)pheromone-resistant (PR), was subcultured in the absence of cOB1 selection and found to be stably resistant to cOB1 killing. The genome of V19(pTEF2)PR was sequenced and aligned to V583 (13). The main difference was excision from the mutant of a 32,719-bp IS-like element annotated as a plasmid remnant (base pairs 131,647–164,366 encompassing ORFs EF0127 to EF0166) (Fig. S2) (17). This region includes genes predicted to encode a relaxase (EF0143), recombinase (EF0166), surface exclusion protein (EF0146), and aggregation substance (EF0149) along with a number of conserved hypothetical proteins. An identical deletion was observed in 10 independently obtained resistant mutants.

Other E. faecalis Strains Harbor Portions of the IS-Like Element That Correlates with Susceptibility to cOB1.

We recently generated a large number of draft genome sequences for a diverse collection of E. faecalis (https://olive.broadinstitute.org/projects/work_package_6) and queried them for integration of an element similar to that lost by V19(pTEF2)PR. Thirteen E. faecalis strains of diverse multilocus sequence types possessed varying portions. Plasmid pTEF2Cm was introduced into each strain by filter mating, and 10 became sensitive to the cOB1 pheromone. Alignment of the genomes of the pheromone-susceptible and -nonsusceptible isolates (Fig. S3) allowed us to narrow the region of the inserted element that sensitizes a strain to pheromone-mediated killing in the presence of pTEF2. All cOB1-susceptible strains possessed at least genes EF0151–EF0165, implicating them or sequences encompassed in the cOB1 susceptibility phenotype. Direct deletion of DNA encoding EF0143–EF0160 rendered V583 resistant to cOB1 killing (Fig. S4), further narrowing the genes involved. Specific deletion of either a putative relaxase (EF0143) or a putative amidase (EF0160), however, did not confer resistance.

Discussion

Little is actually known about the nature of Enterococcus existence in native ecologies. In hospitals, patients acquire MDR E. faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in their GI tract consortia after admission, mainly from contaminated surfaces (6). Colonization is facilitated by destabilization of the patient’s native microbiota by antibiotic treatment, a main predisposing factor (6). A few orally acquired cells are well-positioned to greatly expand into antibiotic-vacated habitats of the gut, which serves as a staging ground for infection. The precise nature of the food web in which the auxotrophic needs are satisfied for either commensal enterococci or hospital-endemic MDR strains is currently unknown. Understanding the fundamental principles of colonization could provide new insights for preventing downstream, antibiotic refractory infection.

We found that prototype MDR E. faecalis V583 possessed limited ability to grow in a consortium of GI tract flora that included commensal enterococci. The incompatibility between V583 and commensal enterococci was traced to the production by commensal strains of the heptapeptide pheromone, cOB1, which induced lethal cross-talk between mobile elements resident in V583–plasmid pTEF2 and an IS-like element resident within the chromosome (Fig. 5). This incompatibility suggests that the accretion of these elements by V583 occurred in the relative absence of commensal enterococci. The susceptibility of V583 to killing by commensal strains provides strong evidence that they rarely occur in the same niche and that V583 has proliferated in habitats in which commensal strains are excluded—because of nutritional requirements, lack of colonization traits, such as those encoded by the PAI, or antibiotic elimination.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Model for pheromone killing of V583. (1) Pheromones expressed by plasmid-free commensal E. faecalis are encoded within the signal peptide of lipoproteins, such as EF2496, which contain within the precursor sequence pheromone cOB1 (red wavy line). The signal peptides are processed, in part, by membrane protease Eep and pumped into the medium by a putative ATP binding transporter, PptAB, discovered here to our knowledge (more details in ref. 37). Functions shown in this work to contribute to the killing and susceptible phenotypes are identified by ✓. Enrichment of commensal enterococci in the fecal consortium (for example, by suppression of competitive microbes with tetracycline) enhanced V583 killing. (2) TraC2, a homolog to known pheromone receptors, presumably facilitates uptake of the cOB1 pheromone identified here as the killing effector molecule produced by commensal enterococci. (3) The main effect of cOB1 on V583 is to specifically induce transcription of plasmid pTEF2 genes over 100-fold. Cross-talk between the induced genes and an essential IS-like element on the chromosome of V583 and a number of other MDR E. faecalis strains resulted in V583 killing. All spontaneously resistant mutants of V583 had spontaneously lost the IS-like element.

The precise mechanism for cOB1 killing of V583 is the subject of ongoing study. Microarray experiments found high levels of cOB1-mediated induction (>100-fold) of many pTEF2 genes related to conjugal transfer and little change in chromosomal gene expression (Tables S2 and S3), giving no obvious clue to the interactions between pTEF2 and the chromosomally integrated IS-like element that is necessary for susceptibility. Recent work from the laboratory of Menard and Grossman (44) has shown that imprecise excision of the Bacillus subtilis integrative and conjugative element, ICEBs1, from nonpreferred sites of integration leads to a loss in cell viability. The element studied here shares properties with ICEBs1, including terminal repeats and genes related to movement. The fact that its imprecise excision may somehow be triggered in trans by pheromone-induced gene products of pTEF2 seems likely. However, we showed that this hypothetical excision is not mediated by the relaxase encoded within the IS-like element, EF0143, or the pTEF2 relaxase mutated in a previous study (30), because both mutants are sensitive to pheromone inhibition. It seems that other proteins encoded by pTEF2 act in trans to volatilize the chromosomal IS-like element on cOB1 induction or otherwise, result in effects that are toxic to the cell (Fig. 5).

Irrespective of mechanism, the incompatibility between V583 and commensal strains of E. faecalis provides clear support for the hypothesis that this MDR hospital strain and commensal enterococci do not occupy the same habitat (20) and begins to shed light on differences in the colonization properties of hospital and commensal lineages of enterococci. This incompatibility highlights the opportunity for therapies that preserve native enterococcal flora as a barrier to colonization by such hospital-adapted lineages.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth of Enterococci in Fecal Consortia.

Fecal samples from healthy volunteers were obtained and pooled using an institutional review board-approved protocol. Pan7, a nonhemolytic, tetracycline-resistant E. faecalis strain speciated by 16S rDNA sequence, was the most abundant Enterococcus in the pooled fecal consortium. Other strains used in this study are listed in Table S4. To approximate cues that occur in the GI tract, a medium was developed that included a commercially available crude extract of HGM (Pfaltz & Bauer); 1% HGM9 was made by dissolving 1% (wt/vol) HGM in Davis minimal medium (24), pH 7.5. E. faecalis and fecal bacteria were grown in 1% HGM9 at 37 °C without shaking. A layer of autoclaved light mineral oil (Fisher Scientific) was added to cultures containing fecal bacteria to limit oxygenation.

Fitness of V583 and Mutants Assessed in Coculture.

The effect of fecal flora on growth and proliferation of V583 was determined in 1% HGM9. Various carbohydrates were added to induce population shifts within the fecal population. Details of the coculture assay are provided in SI Materials and Methods.

Assessment of Killing Activity of Purified Peptides.

Soft agar overlay assays were used to screen and visualize killing of various E. faecalis strains by commensal enterococci or purified pheromones as described in SI Materials and Methods. V19(pTEF2), which showed the greatest sensitivity, was used in soft agar overlays to detect inhibition by purified pheromones. The 81 theorized pheromone peptides were synthesized initially at >75% purity (Lifetein, LLC) and resuspended in acetonitrile. Peptides exhibiting inhibitory activity were resynthesized and HPLC-purified to >95% purity. Inhibitory activity was determined as a visible zone of clearing affected by where 1 μL 1-mg/mL solution of the peptide was placed. To determine comparative activities of peptides exhibiting activity, highly purified peptides were diluted twofold in acetonitrile, and 1-µL aliquots of each dilution were again spotted on the top agar lawn.

Generation of traC-2, EF0143, EF0160, and EF0143–EF0160 Deletion Mutants in V583 and Deletion of EF2496 in FA2-2.

Deletion of most of the coding sequences of traC-2, EF0143, EF0160, and EF2496 in strain FA2-2, generating in-frame fusions of sequences near the start and stop codons of each, minimized polar effects essentially as described (45). A similar approach was used to delete sequences spanning from EF0143 to EF0160. Primers used for the construction of plasmid deletion constructs are listed in Table S5, and detailed information on construction of mutants is provided in SI Materials and Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
pnas.201500553SI.pdf (326.5KB, pdf)

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1500553112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Huttenhower C, et al. Human Microbiome Project Consortium Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ley RE, et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008;320(5883):1647–1651. doi: 10.1126/science.1155725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walter J, Ley R. The human gut microbiome: Ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:411–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term impacts of antibiotic exposure on the human intestinal microbiota. Microbiology. 2010;156(Pt 11):3216–3223. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.040618-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martin JD, Mundt JO. Enterococci in insects. Appl Microbiol. 1972;24(4):575–580. doi: 10.1128/am.24.4.575-580.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gilmore MS, Lebreton F, van Schaik W. Genomic transition of enterococci from gut commensals to leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital infection in the antibiotic era. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16(1):10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Van Tyne D, Gilmore MS. Friend turned foe: Evolution of enterococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:337–356. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-113003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palmer KL, et al. Comparative genomics of enterococci: Variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. MBio. 2012;3(1):e00318-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00318-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Niven CF, Sherman JM. Nutrition of the Enterococci. J Bacteriol. 1944;47(4):335–342. doi: 10.1128/jb.47.4.335-342.1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sievert DM, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(1):1–14. doi: 10.1086/668770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lebreton F, et al. Emergence of epidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium from animal and commensal strains. MBio. 2013;4(4):e00534-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00534-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sahm DF, et al. In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33(9):1588–1591. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paulsen IT, et al. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science. 2003;299(5615):2071–2074. doi: 10.1126/science.1080613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shankar N, Baghdayan AS, Gilmore MS. Modulation of virulence within a pathogenicity island in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Nature. 2002;417(6890):746–750. doi: 10.1038/nature00802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gold OG, Jordan HV, van Houte J. The prevalence of enterococci in the human mouth and their pathogenicity in animal models. Arch Oral Biol. 1975;20(7):473–477. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(75)90236-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB. Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus faecalis: Evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75(7):3479–3483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McBride SM, Fischetti VA, Leblanc DJ, Moellering RC, Jr, Gilmore MS. Genetic diversity among Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(7):e582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bourgogne A, et al. Large scale variation in Enterococcus faecalis illustrated by the genome analysis of strain OG1RF. Genome Biol. 2008;9(7):R110. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Palmer KL, Gilmore MS. Multidrug-resistant enterococci lack CRISPR-cas. MBio. 2010;1(4):e00227-10. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00227-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gilmore MS, Ferretti JJ. Microbiology. The thin line between gut commensal and pathogen. Science. 2003;299(5615):1999–2002. doi: 10.1126/science.1083534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jordens JZ, Bates J, Griffiths DT. Faecal carriage and nosocomial spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;34(4):515–528. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.4.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van der Auwera P, Pensart N, Korten V, Murray BE, Leclercq R. Influence of oral glycopeptides on the fecal flora of human volunteers: Selection of highly glycopeptide-resistant enterococci. J Infect Dis. 1996;173(5):1129–1136. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.5.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Laux DC, Cohen PS, Conway T. Role of the mucus layer in bacterial colonization of the intestine. In: Nataro JP, Cohen PS, Mobley HLT, Weiser JN, editors. Colonization of Mucosal Surfaces. American Society for Microbiology; Washington, DC: 2005. pp. 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press; Plainview, NY: 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brock TD, Peacher B, Pierson D. Survey of the bacteriocines of enterococci. J Bacteriol. 1963;86(4):702–707. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.702-707.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clewell DB, et al. Mapping of Streptococcus faecalis plasmids pAD1 and pAD2 and studies relating to transposition of Tn917. J Bacteriol. 1982;152(3):1220–1230. doi: 10.1128/jb.152.3.1220-1230.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Héchard Y, Pelletier C, Cenatiempo Y, Frère J. Analysis of sigma(54)-dependent genes in Enterococcus faecalis: A mannose PTS permease (EII(Man)) is involved in sensitivity to a bacteriocin, mesentericin Y105. Microbiology. 2001;147(Pt 6):1575–1580. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-6-1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dalet K, Briand C, Cenatiempo Y, Héchard Y. The rpoN gene of Enterococcus faecalis directs sensitivity to subclass IIa bacteriocins. Curr Microbiol. 2000;41(6):441–443. doi: 10.1007/s002840010164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Iyer VS, Hancock LE. Deletion of σ(54) (rpoN) alters the rate of autolysis and biofilm formation in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(2):368–375. doi: 10.1128/JB.06046-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manson JM, Hancock LE, Gilmore MS. Mechanism of chromosomal transfer of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenicity island, capsule, antimicrobial resistance, and other traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(27):12269–12274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000139107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hanin A, et al. Screening of in vivo activated genes in Enterococcus faecalis during insect and mouse infections and growth in urine. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(7):e11879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Clewell DB, Weaver KE. Sex pheromones and plasmid transfer in Enterococcus faecalis. Plasmid. 1989;21(3):175–184. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(89)90041-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.An FY, Clewell DB. Identification of the cAD1 sex pheromone precursor in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(7):1880–1887. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.7.1880-1887.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Clewell DB, Francia MV, Flannagan SE, An FY. Enterococcal plasmid transfer: Sex pheromones, transfer origins, relaxases, and the Staphylococcus aureus issue. Plasmid. 2002;48(3):193–201. doi: 10.1016/s0147-619x(02)00113-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.An FY, Sulavik MC, Clewell DB. Identification and characterization of a determinant (eep) on the Enterococcus faecalis chromosome that is involved in production of the peptide sex pheromone cAD1. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(19):5915–5921. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.19.5915-5921.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Varahan S, Iyer VS, Moore WT, Hancock LE. Eep confers lysozyme resistance to enterococcus faecalis via the activation of the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor SigV. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(14):3125–3134. doi: 10.1128/JB.00291-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Varahan S, Harms N, Gilmore MS, Tomich JM, Hancock LE. An ABC transporter is required for secretion of peptide sex pheromones in Enterococcus faecalis. MBio. 2014;5(5):e01726-14–e14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01726-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clewell DB. Properties of Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1, a member of a widely disseminated family of pheromone-responding, conjugative, virulence elements encoding cytolysin. Plasmid. 2007;58(3):205–227. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dunny GM. The peptide pheromone-inducible conjugation system of Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10: Cell-cell signalling, gene transfer, complexity and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362(1483):1185–1193. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Leonard BA, Podbielski A, Hedberg PJ, Dunny GM. Enterococcus faecalis pheromone binding protein, PrgZ, recruits a chromosomal oligopeptide permease system to import sex pheromone cCF10 for induction of conjugation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(1):260–264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Altschul SF, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dunny GM, Leonard BA. Cell-cell communication in gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1997;51:527–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nakayama J, Abe Y, Ono Y, Isogai A, Suzuki A. Isolation and Structure of the Enterococcus faecalis Sex Pheromone, cOB1, That Induces Conjugal Transfer of the Hemolysin/Bacteriocin Plasmids, pOB1 and pYI1. Japan Society for Bioscience Biotechnology and Agrochemistry; Tokyo: 1995. pp. 703–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Menard KL, Grossman AD. Selective pressures to maintain attachment site specificity of integrative and conjugative elements. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(7):e1003623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thomas VC, Thurlow LR, Boyle D, Hancock LE. Regulation of autolysis-dependent extracellular DNA release by Enterococcus faecalis extracellular proteases influences biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(16):5690–5698. doi: 10.1128/JB.00314-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
pnas.201500553SI.pdf (326.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES