Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2015 Apr 1;8(4):4186–4203.

Peripheral T cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified with myelofibrosis: report of a case with review of the literature

Yasunobu Sekiguchi 1, Syuichi Shirane 2, Asami Shimada 1, Kunimoto Ichikawa 1, Mutsumi Wakabayashi 1, Keiji Sugimoto 1, Shigeki Tomita 3, Hiroshi Izumi 3, Noriko Nakamura 4, Tomohiro Sawada 4, Yasunori Ohta 5, Norio Komatsu 2, Masaaki Noguchi 1
PMCID: PMC4466999  PMID: 26097612

Abstract

A 68-year-old man presented to us with pancytopenia, erythroderma, and multiple lymphadenopathies. Lymph node biopsy led to the diagnosis of peripheral T-Cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). Immunostaining of the lymph node biopsy specimens for cytokines revealed that the tumor cells were positive for plated-derived growth factor (PDGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Bone marrow biopsy revealed infiltration by the PTCL-NOS and myelofibrosis (MF). Bone marrow blood was negative for JAK-2V617F. Bone marrow immunostaining for cytokines showed that the tumor cells were positive for PDGF, b-FGF, VEGF, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, and TGF-β. The patient was initiated on treatment, and after the first course of CHOP therapy, the bone marrow infiltration by the PTCL-NOS and MF improved. Repeat immunostaining of bone marrow biopsy specimens for cytokines showed that the tumor cells had become negative for PDGF, VEGF, TNF-α and TGF-β. However, after the second course of CHOP therapy, the bone marrow infiltration by the PTCL-NOS and MF worsened. Immunostaining of bone marrow specimens for cytokines again revealed positive staining results of the tumor cells for PDGF, TNF-α, and TGF-β. At the completion of the first course of treatment, the infiltration by the PTCL-NOS improved, but not the pancytopenia.

Keywords: Peripheral T-Cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), bone marrow fibrosis (MF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)

Introduction

Primary myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by clonal proliferation of megakaryocytes, monocytes and histiocytes, and the various cytokines produced by these cells, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), are thought to be among the major causes of MF [1-3]. Malignant lymphoma complicated by MF is rare and the cause of MF in this condition remains unknown in many cases [4-12]. However, some studies, including our previous study, have speculated that cytokines such as TGF-β [13-15], b-FGF [2,16] and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [2,14,15], may be responsible for the MF associated with malignant lymphoma, just as in the case of primary MF.

This is the first reported case of T-cell lymphoma complicated by MF, in which both immunostaining and serum assays were performed for cytokines. In the patient presented here, while on immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells showed positive staining for PDGF, TGF-β and TNF-α, serum assay revealed elevation only of the serum titers of TNFα, suggesting that the tumor cells in the bone marrow produced PDGF, TGF-β, and TNF-α, thereby causing MF. This is the first report of TNF-α production in the bone marrow in a patient with T-cell lymphoma and MF.

Case

A 68-year-old man was referred to us with pancytopenia, generalized edema and erythroderma, and multiple superficial and deep lymphadenopathies. He had no significant past medical or family history. His clinical course is shown in Figure 1. In early June 2014, he visited a local hospital with generalized edema and erythroderma. He was prescribed a topical steroid, but showed no improvement. In early July, he developed pancytopenia, and in late July, he was admitted to the Department of Dermatology of our hospital. Skin biopsy led to the diagnosis of erythrodermic psoriasis. Treatment with prednisolone 15 mg/day was started, and the generalized edema and erythroderma improved. However, the pancytopenia worsened and a whole-body CT showed multiple superficial and deep lymphadenopathies (Figure 2A-D). Therefore, the patient was referred to our department in mid-August.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clinical course. PSL: prednisolone; CHOP; cyclophosphamide hydrate, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, and prednisolone; CEPP: cyclophosphamide hydrate, etoposide, prednisolone, and procarbazine hydrochloride; WBC: white blood cell; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CT findings. A-D. Before CHOP therapy. E-H. After one course of CHOP therapy. I-L. After two courses of CHOP therapy. A. A low-density mass is seen in the left lobe of the thyroid gland (red arrow); B. Enlarged lymph nodes are seen in both the axillae (red arrows); C. Enlarged lymph nodes are seen around the aorta (red arrow); D. Enlarged lymph nodes are seen in both inguinal regions (red arrows); E. Decrease in the size of the low-density mass in the left lobe of the thyroid gland (blue arrow); F. Decrease in the size of the lymph nodes in both the axillae (blue arrows); G. Decrease in the size of the lymph nodes around the aorta (blue arrow); H. Decrease in the size of the lymph nodes in both inguinal regions (blue arrows); I. The low-density mass in the left lobe of the thyroid gland remains unchanged in size (yellow arrow); J. Further decrease in the size of the lymph nodes in both the axillae (yellow arrows); K. Further decrease in the size of the lymph nodes around the aorta (yellow arrow); L. Further decrease in the size of the lymph nodes in both inguinal regions (yellow arrows).

The findings at the time of admission were as follows: height 173.1 cm, weight 71.0 kg, body temperature 37.4°C, blood pressure 128/62 mm Hg, pulse 80/minute, regular, clear consciousness, pallor of the palpebral conjunctiva, no icterus of the bulbar conjunctiva, no palpable liver or spleen, and no abnormal neurological findings. A few, elastic soft, superficial lymph nodes measuring about 3 cm in size were palpable in both the axillae and both inguinal regions. Mild eruption with pigmentation was seen over the entire body.

The laboratory findings on admission are shown in Table 1. He had pancytopenia and elevated serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP). In addition, the soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) level was as high as 5,410 U/mL. Among the serum cytokines, only the serum level of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) was elevated.

Table 1.

Laboratory findings

CBC WBC 500/mL
Band 16.0%
Seg 53.0%
Ly 27.0%
Mono 1.0%
Eo 2.0%
Ba 1.0%
RBC 311 × 104/mL
Hb 10.3 g/dL
Ht 32.0%
MCV 102.9 fl
MCH 33.1 pg
Plt 6.8 × 104/mL
Reti 1.1%
Coagulation PT 80%
APTT 32.8 sec
Fbg 203 mg/dL
FDP 8.8 µg/mL
DD 3.64 µg/mL
AT3 53%
Biochemistry T.P 5.1 g/dL
Alb 3.0 g/dL
AST 24 IU/L
ALT 31 IU/L
LDH 398 IU/L
ALP 169 IU/L
g-GTP 22 IU/L
T-Bil 0.6 mg/dL
BUN 16 mg/dL
Cr 0.90 mg/dL
CRP 1.9 mg/dL
Ferritin 372.0 ng/mL
Immuno-serological findings IgG 851 mg/dL
IgA 156 mg/dL
IgM 25 mg/dL
Antinuclear antibodies ×40
sIL-2R 5,410 U/mL
HTLV-1 antibodies -
HIV antibodies -
Serum cCytokine PDGF-AB 845 pg/mL (10,499-29,463)
VEGF 33 pg/mL (62-707)
TGF-β1 2.40 ng/mL (1.56-3.24)
High-sensitivity TNF-α 12.3 pg/mL (0.550-2.816)
b-FGF ≤10 pg/mL (≤10)
IL-6 5.7 pg/mL (≤4.0)
IL-10 125 pg/mL (ND-5)
Urinalysis No abnormalities
Lymph node G-Band 46,Y,add(X)(q22),del(6)(q?),-9,inv(9)(p12q13),del(11)(q?),-12,add(13)(q22),add(16)(q12.1),add(18)(q21),+mar1,+mar2
TCRCβ1 Gene rearrangement detected
IG(H)JH Gene rearrangement detected
CCR4 (immunostaining) +
Bone marrow G-Band Poor growth
TCRCβ1 Not tested due to insufficient specimen size
IG(H)JH Not tested due to insufficient specimen size
JAK2V617F No gene mutations (paraffin block specimen)

Denotes above the upper limit of the reference range;

Denotes below the lower limit of the reference range.

WBC, white blood cell; Seg, segment; Ly, lymphocyte; Mono, monocyte; Eo, eosinocyte; Ba, basophile; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; Ht, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular cell volume; MCH, mean corpuscular cell hemoglobin; Plt, plate; Reti, reticulocyte; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; Fbg, fibrinogen; FDP, fibrin fibrinogen degradation; DD, D-dimer; AT3, antithrombin III; T.P, total protein; Alb, albumin, AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; γ-GTP, γ-guanosine triphosphate; T-Bil, total bilirubin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgM, immunoglobulin M; HTLV-1, human T-cell leukemia virus-1; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PDGF-AB, platelet-derived endothelial growth factor-AB; FGF-basic, fibroblast growth factors-basic; IL-10, interleukin-10; G-Band, G-Banding; add, additional material of unknown origin; del, deletion; mar, marker chromosome; IG(H)JH, immunoglobulin heavy chain.

The patient’s clinical course after referral to our department is shown in Figure 1. First, a left axillary lymph node biopsy was performed; examination of hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained sections showed that the basic architecture of the lymph node was lost, with proliferation of medium-sized atypical cells with irregular nuclear contours (Figure 3A, 3B). Immunostaining revealed that the tumor cells were positive for CD2, CD3, and C-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CCR4) (Figure 3C, 3D, 3P) and negative for CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD10, CD20, CD56, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER), granzyme B, and programmed cell death 1 (PD1) (Figure 3E-J, 3L-O); CD21 immunostaining showed no proliferation of follicular dendritic cells (Figure 3K). G-banding chromosome analysis of the lymph nodes revealed a complex karyotype (Table 1), and Southern blot analysis showed rearrangement of T-Cell Receptor Cβ1 (TCRCβ1) (data not shown). Based on the above findings, the patient was diagnosed as having peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). Furthermore, immunostaining for cytokines revealed that the tumor cells in the lymph nodes were positive for PDGF, b-FGF, VEGF, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, and TGF-β (Figure 4A-P) and negative for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and fibronectin (FN) (Figure 4Q-T).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pathological findings of the left axillary lymph node biopsy specimen. A. (HE; ×40); B. (HE; ×600), The basic architecture of the lymph node is lost and proliferation of medium-sized atypical cells with irregular nuclear contours is observed; C. (CD2; ×600), positive; D. (CD3; ×600), positive; E. (CD4; ×600), negative; F. (CD5; ×600), negative; G. (CD7; ×600), negative; H. (CD8; ×600), negative; I. (CD10; ×600), negative; J. (CD20; ×600), negative; K. (CD21; ×600), No proliferation of follicular dendritic cells is observed; L. (CD56; ×600), negative; M. (EBER; ×600), negative; N. (Granzyme B; ×600), negative; O. (PD 1; ×600), negative; P. (CCR4; ×600), positive.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immunostaining of the left axillary lymph node biopsy specimen for cytokines. A. (PDGF; ×40), positive; B. (PDGF; ×400), positive; C. (b-FGF; ×40), positive; D. (b-FGF; ×400), positive; E. (VEGF; ×40), positive; F. (VEGF; ×400), positive; G. (TNF-α; ×40), positive; H. (TNF-α; ×400), positive; I. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; J. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; K. (IL-1β; ×40), positive; L. (IL-1β; ×400), positive; M. (IL-2; ×40), positive; N. (IL-2; ×400), positive; O. (TGF-β; ×40), positive; P. (TGF-β; ×400), positive; Q. (IL-6; ×40), negative; R. (IL-6; ×400), negative; S. (FN; ×40), negative; T. (FN; ×400), negative.

Cerebrospinal fluid examination showed no central nervous system infiltration. Bone marrow examination showed atypical cells (Figure 5A, 5B), although only a very small amount of specimen could be collected by fine needle aspiration due to a dry tap. Bone marrow biopsy revealed infiltration by the PTCL-NOS (Figure 5C-H). In addition, silver impregnation staining revealed MF (Figure 5I, 5J). There was almost no normal hematopoietic tissue. Bone marrow blood was negative for JAK-2 V617F (data not shown). Based on the presence of bone marrow infiltration, the clinical stage was classified as IV B. Bone marrow immunostaining for cytokines showed that tumor cells were positive for PDGF, b-FGF, VEGF, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, and TGF-β (Figure 6A-P), and negative for IL-6 and FN (Figure 6Q-T).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bone marrow findings before treatment. A. (May-Giemsa staining; ×40); B. (May-Giemsa staining; ×600), marked hypoplasia of all the three hematopoietic lineages is observed, but with a maintained M/E ratio. There are a few atypical nucleated cells; C. (HE; ×40); D. (HE; ×600), atypical cells with enlarged nuclei are seen; E. (CD3; ×40); F. (CD3; ×600), positive; G. (Ki-67; ×40); H. (Ki-67; ×600), 10% positive; I. (silver impregnation; ×40); J. (silver impregnation; ×600), fibrosis is observed.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Bone marrow immunostaining for cytokines before treatment. A. (PDGF; ×40), positive; B. (PDGF; ×400), positive; C. (b-FGF; ×40), positive; D. (b-FGF; ×400), positive; E. (VEGF; ×40), positive; F. (VEGF; ×400), positive; G. (TNF-α; ×40), positive; H. (TNF-α; ×400), positive; I. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; J. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; K. (IL-1β; ×40), positive; L. (IL-1β; ×400), positive; M. (IL-2; ×40), positive; N. (IL-2; ×400), positive; O. (TGF-β; ×40), positive; P. (TGF-β; ×400), positive; Q. (IL-6; ×40), negative; R. (IL-6; ×400), negative; S. (FN; ×40), negative; T. (FN; ×400), negative.

As the lymphadenopathy became worse and the white blood cell count decreased further to 100/μL (likely caused by the bone marrow infiltration by the PTCL-NOS and MF), the patient was started on the first course of CHOP therapy (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2: day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2: day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (max. 2 mg): day 1, prednisolone 100 mg/body: day 1-5) in early September. The lymphadenopathy improved (Figure 2E-H) and the white blood cell count also improved to 1,500/μL by late September. Bone marrow examination showed a marked decrease of infiltration by the PTCL-NOS (Figure 7A-H) and improvement in the MF (Figure 7I, 7J). Immunostaining for cytokines revealed positive staining for b-FGF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-6 (Figure 8C, 8D, 8I-N, 8Q, 8R), but negative staining for PDGF, VEGF, TNF-α, FN, and TGF-β (Figure 8A, 8B, 8E-H, 8O, 8P, 8S, 8T). The patient was started on the second course of CHOP therapy in early October. In late October, the white blood cell count again decreased to 100/μL, and the serum LDH and sIL-2R levels increased. CT showed disappearance of the lymphadenopathy (Figure 2I-L), but bone marrow examination revealed progression of the PTCL-NOS infiltration (Figure 9A-H) and MF (Figure 9I, 9J). Immunostaining for cytokines showed that the tumor cells were positive for PDGF, b-FGF, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, TGF-β, and IL-6 (Figure 10A, 10B, 10D-F, 10H, 10I), but negative for VEGF, IL-2, and FN (Figure 10C, 10G, 10J). The patient was judged as being refractory to CHOP therapy, and the treatment was switched to mogamulizumab (1 mg/kg) in mid-November. He received two courses of mogamulizumab, however, the serum LDH and sIL-2R levels increased further, and the superficial lymphadenopathy also became worse. The treatment was changed again to CEPP therapy (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2: day 1, 8, etoposide 70 mg/m2: day 1-3, procarbazine 60 mg/m2: day 1-10, prednisolone 60 mg/m2: day 1-10) in early December. As of mid-December, the superficial lymphadenopathy had improved and the serum LDH and sIL-2R levels had decreased, however, the blood cell counts had not yet improved. We considered allogeneic transplantation, but the patient and his family declined to provide consent for the procedure.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Bone marrow findings after one course of CHOP therapy. A. (May-Giemsa staining; ×40); B. (May-Giemsa staining; ×600), the number of nucleated cells is markedly reduced, and the number of atypical cells is also reduced. There are hemophagocytes; C. (HE; ×40); D. (HE; ×600), the number of atypical cells is reduced; E. (CD3; ×40); F. (CD3; ×600), only some cells are positive; G. (Ki-67; ×40); H. (Ki-67; ×600), only a small percentage of the cells is positive; I. (silver impregnation; ×40); J. (silver impregnation; ×600); the fibrosis is improved.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Bone marrow immunostaining for cytokines after one course of CHOP therapy. A. (PDGF; ×40), negative; B. (PDGF; ×400), negative; C. (b-FGF; ×40), positive; D. b-FGF; ×400), positive; E. (VEGF; ×40), negative; F. (VEGF; ×400); negative; G. (TNF-α; ×40), negative; H. (TNF-α; ×400), negative; I. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; J. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; K. (IL-1β; ×40), positive; L. (IL-1β; ×400), positive; M. (IL-2; ×40), positive; N. (IL-2; ×400), positive; O. (TGF-β; ×40), negative; P. (TGF-β; ×400), negative; Q. (IL-6; ×40), positive; R. (IL-6; ×400), positive; S. (FN; ×40), negative; T. (FN; ×400), negative.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Bone marrow findings after two courses of CHOP therapy. A. (May-Giemsa staining; ×40); B. (May-Giemsa staining; ×600), the number of nucleated cells is markedly reduced, whereas the number of atypical cells is increased; C. (HE; ×40); D. (HE; ×600), the number of atypical cells is increased; E. (CD3; ×40); F. (CD3; ×600), the number of cells showing positive staining is increased; G. (Ki-67; ×40); H. (Ki-67; ×600), approximately 10% of the cells were positive; I. (silver impregnation; ×40); J. (silver impregnation; ×600); the fibrosis is worse.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Bone marrow immunostaining for cytokines after two courses of CHOP therapy. A. (PDGF; ×40), positive; B. (PDGF; ×400), positive; C. (b-FGF; ×40), positive; D. (b-FGF; ×400), positive; E. (VEGF; ×40), negative; F. (VEGF; ×400), negative; G. (TNF-α; ×40), positive; H. (TNF-α; ×400), positive; I. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; J. (IFN-γ; ×40), positive; K. (IL-1β; ×40), positive; L. (IL-1β; ×400), positive; M. (IL-2; ×40), negative; N. (IL-2; ×400), negative; O. (TGF-β; ×40), positive; P. (TGF-β; ×400), positive; Q. (IL-6; ×40), positive; R. (IL-6; ×400), positive; S. (FN; ×40), negative; T. (FN; ×400), negative.

Discussion

Primary myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by clonal proliferation of megakaryocytes, monocytes and histiocytes, and the various cytokines produced by these cells, such as TGF-β, b-FGF, VEGF and TNF-α, are thought to be among the major causes of MF [1-3]. Malignant lymphoma complicated by MF is rare and the cause of MF in this condition remains unknown in many cases [4-12]. However, some studies have speculated that various cytokines may be responsible for the MF associated with malignant lymphoma, just as in the case of primary MF [2,13-16].

To the best of our knowledge, there have been only a total of 15 reported cases of T-cell lymphoma complicated by MF, including the 7 cases of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) previously reported by us and the present case (Table 2). The characteristics of these patients are summarized in Table 3. The median age of the reported patients is 65 (19-90) years, and there were 8 men and 6 women (n = 14). AITL was the most common histological type of lymphoma (n = 7), followed in frequency by PTCL (n = 6). One patient had cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma and one had T-cell lymphoma, the details of which are unknown. All patients, but one, had an advanced stage of the disease (stage III, 2 patients, and stage IV, 12 patients). Bone marrow infiltration was commonly seen: 12 of the 15 patients had bone marrow infiltration. Serum TGF-β is the cytokine that is most commonly thought to cause MF (n = 3) [13-15], followed in frequency by tumor cell b-FGF (detected by tumor cell immunostaining) (n = 2) [2,16], tumor cell PDGF (detected by tumor cell immunostaining) (n = 2) [2; and the present case], and serum PDGF (n = 2) [14,15], although in some patients, multiple cytokines were thought to cause MF (n = 6: tumor cell cytokines [detected by immunostaining alone], n = 2; serum cytokines alone, n = 3; both tumor cell and serum cytokines, n = 1 [the present case]). Tumor cell TGF-β (detected by tumor cell immunostaining), tumor cell TNF-α (detected by tumor cell immunostaining), and serum TNF-α were thought to cause MF only in the present case. The cytokines causing the MF remained unknown in as many as 7 patients. Various treatments for the T-cell lymphoma were employed, and 8 patients improved. One patient improved only to deteriorate subsequently, one did not improve, and one deteriorated, suggesting that the treatments for T-cell lymphoma do not always improve the MF and careful observation is required. In addition, 8 patients died, suggesting that the disease carries a very poor prognosis [4,5,8-11,13,16].

Table 2.

List of reports of T-cell lymphoma complicated by myelofibrosis

Case Age/sex Histological type Stage BM Infilt-ration Cytokine Treatment Results (T-cell lymphoma) Results (BMF) Outcome Ref.
1 67/F PTCL-NOS IV + NA PSL Improved→ relapse NA Died of sepsis [4]
CHOP CNS infiltration
I.T.
2 90/M PTCL-U IV + b-FGF (immuno-staining) - Deterioration NA Died of liver dysfunction after 1 M [5]
3 68/M PTCL-U IV + TGF-β (serum) THP-COP Deterioration Deteriora-tion Died of DIC after 9 M [6]
2 courses
4 69/M PTCL IV + NA Chemotherapy NA Improved Died of bone marrow suppression due to BMF after 2Y6 M [7]
3 courses
5 46/F T-cell lymphoma (details unknown) IV + NA Splenectomy Improved→ relapse Improved 11 M, surviving [8]
CHOP Improved→ relapse
Salvage therapy (ifosfamide, carboplatinum, etoposide) Improved→ Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation being considered
6 19/F Cytotoxic T- cell lymphoma IV + PDGF CY, DXR, VCR, PSL PR→ Allogeneic transplantation Improved 1 Y, remission, surviving [9]
TGF-β (serum)
7 65/F PTCL IV + NA DVP Improved Improved 10 M, surviving [10]
CHOP
I.T. (MTX, Ara-C)
Cranial irradiation, 40 Gy
8 68/M PTCL-NOS IV + PDGF CHOP Improved→ Relapse Deterioration Improved Improved→ Deterio-ration, No improve-ment, unknown 7 M, surviving This case
TNF-α Mogamulizumab
TGF-β (immuno-staining) CEPP
9 63/M AITL IV + 0NA PSL 50 mg Improved NA Died of systemic candidemia after 6 M [11]
10 NA/NA AITL II or great-er - NA PSL CR→ relapse NA Died of sepsis after 25 M [12]
11 69/F AITL III - NA PSL 60 mg Improved Improved Died of biliary cirrhosis after 15 M [13]
12 47/M AITL IV + NA PSL 30 mg Improved→ relapse→ improved Not improved Died of pulmonary aspergillosis after 3 m [14]
PSL 60 mg
13 55/F AITL IV + NA PSL, VCR PR Improved 12 M, surviving [15]
14 56/M AITL III - PDGF TGFβ (serum) CHOP CR→ relapse→ CR Improved 12 M, surviving [16]
ESHAP
CHASE
15 65/M AITL IV + PDGF CHOP CR→ CNS relapse Improved 13 M, surviving [2]
b-FGF (immuno-staining) ESHAP
Auto mPSL pulse
WBI

BM, bone marrow; BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; M, male; F, female; PSL, prednisolone; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone; I.T., intrathecal administration of anticancer agents; NA, not available; PTCL-U, Peripheral T-Cell lymphoma-unspecified; y, years; m, months; THP-COP, pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; CY, cyclophosphamide; DXR, doxorubicin; VCR, vincristine; DVP, daunomycin, vincristine, prednisolone; MTX, methotrexate; Ara-C, cytarabine; Gy, gray; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; CEPP; cyclophosphamide hydrate, etoposide, prednisolone, procarbazine hydrochloride; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; ESHAP, etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, cisplatin; CHASE, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, etoposide, dexamerthasone; MCVAC, ranimustine, cytarabine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide; Auto, autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; mPSL, methylprednisolone; WBI, whole brain irradiation.

Table 3.

Summary of reports of T-cell lymphoma complicated by myelofibrosis

Age/sex Median age: 65 (19-90) years
Male: female = 8:6 (n = 14)
Histological type AITL: n = 7
PTCL: n = 6
Cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma: n = 1
NA: n = 1
Stage Stage II or greater: n = 1
Stage III: n = 2
Stage IV: n = 12
BM infiltration +: n = 12
-: n = 3
Cytokine (Multiple cytokines in the same patients) b-FGF (immunostaining): n = 2
TGF-β (immunostaining): n = 1
TGF-β (serum): n = 3
PDGF (immunostaining): n = 2
PDGF (serum): n = 2
TNF-α (immunostaining): n = 1
TNF-α (serum): n = 1
NA: n = 9
(n = 6)
Treatment PSL: n = 7
mPSL: n = 1
CHOP: n = 6
THP-COP: n = 1
DVP: n = 1
CEPP: n = 1
Mogamulizumab: n = 1
CEPP: n = 1
ESHAP: n = 2
CHASE: n = 1
Auto: n = 1
I.T.: n = 2
None: n = 1
Chemotherapy: n = 3
Salvage therapy: n = 1
Splenectomy: n = 1
WBI: n = 2
Results (T-cell lymphoma) Improved: n = 9
Improved→ Deterioration: n = 3
Deterioration: n = 2
NA: n = 1
Results (BMF) Improved: n = 8
Improved→ Deterioration: n = 1
No improvement: n = 1
Deterioration: n = 1
NA: n = 4
Outcome Surviving: n = 7
Died: n = 8

PSL, prednisolone; NA, not available; mPSL, methylprednisolone; THP-COP, pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone; DVP, daunomycin, vincristine, prednisolone; ESHAP, etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, cisplatin; CHASE, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, etoposide, dexamerthasone; Auto, autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; I.T., intrathecal administration of anticancer agents.

The cytokines that were thought to be responsible for the MF in the present case are discussed. PDGF, b-FGF, VEGF, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, and TGF-β were immunohistochemically detected in both the lymph nodes and the bone marrow with MF before treatment (Figures 4, 6; Table 4). After one course of CHOP therapy, the MF in the bone marrow improved, and the tumor cells in the bone marrow became negative for PDGF, VEGF, TNF-α, and TGF-β (Figure 8; Table 4). However, the cells became positive again for PDGF, TNF-α, and TGF-β (Figure 10O, 10P), along with progression of the MF, after two courses of CHOP therapy (Figure 9), suggesting the contribution of these cytokines to MF. The tumor cells remained negative for VEGF as the MF progressed, suggesting the lack of contribution of VEGF to the MF (Figure 10E, 10F).

Table 4.

List of changes of the results of immunostaining of the lymph nodes and bone marrow for cytokines

LN BM BM BM

Before CHOP Before CHOP After one course of CHOP After two courses of CHOP
BMF + - +
PDGF + + - +
b-FGF + + + +
VEGF + + - -
TNF-α + + - +
IFN-γ + + + +
IL-1β + + + +
IL-2 + + + -
TGF-β + + - +
IL-6 - - + +
FN - - - -

In regard to the serum cytokines (Table 5), only the serum TNF-α level was elevated (12.3 pg/mL) prior to the start of the treatment, while the serum levels of PDGF, VEGF, and TGF-β did not increase. After one course of CHOP therapy, the serum TNF-α level decreased to 2.4 pg/mL (within the normal range), associated with improvement of the MF. However, the serum TNF-α level increased again to 5.7 pg/mL with progression of the MF. TNF-α was the only cytokine whose level was increased in the serum and was also detected in the tumor cells by immunostaining. It was unclear whether only TNF-α, whose level in the serum was increased and which was also detected by immunostaining, was involved in the development of the MF, or whether PDGF and TGF-β, which were detected in the tumor cells by immunostaining but did not increase in the serum, were also involved. This is the first reported case of MF associated with lymphoma in which TNF-α is speculated as the cause of the MF.

Table 5.

List of changes of the serum levels of cytokines

Before CHOP After one course of CHOP After two courses of CHOP
BMF + ± +
PDGF (pg/ml) (10,499-29,463) 845 ≤780 1010
b-FGF (pg/ml) (≤10) ≤10 ≤10 ≤10
VEGF (pg/ml) (62-707) 33 23 32
TNF-α (pg/ml) (0.550-2.816) 12.3 2.4 5.7
IFN-γ n.a. n.a. n.a.
IL-1β n.a. n.a. n.a.
IL-2 n.a. n.a. n.a.
TGF-β (ng/ml) (1.56-3.24) 2.40 1.25 1.24
IL-6 (pg/ml) (≤4.0) 5.7 3.9 11.6
FN n.a. n.a. n.a.

BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; n.a., XXXX.

This is the only report published so far investigating cytokines by both serum assay and tumor cell immunostaining (Table 2). It is considered important to identify the causes of MF by accumulating the results of measurements of cytokines by both serum assay and tumor cell immunostaining in patients with T-cell lymphoma and MF and determining the specificity and sensitivity of the assays.

It was reported that administration of neutralizing anti-GM-CSF or anti-IL-3 antibodies improved MF in mice with primary MF [3], suggesting that the use of neutralizing anti-cytokine antibodies should be considered for MF that is unresponsive to treatment for T-cell lymphoma, like in the present case.

In this case, as TNF-α was speculated as one of the causes of the MF, administration of anti-TNF-α antibody (infliximab, which is covered by the national health insurance only if used for rheumatoid arthritis or refractory uveoretinitis associated with Behcet’s disease in Japan) may be considered in the future. In addition, since there was almost no normal hematopoietic tissue in the bone marrow, and we considered allogeneic transplantation; however, the patient declined to provide consent for this procedure.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Tefferi A. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1255–1265. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004273421706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sekiguchi Y, Matsuzawa N, Shimada A, Imai H, Wakabayashi M, Sugimoto K, Nakamura N, Sawada T, Izutsu K, Takeuchi K, Ohta Y, Komatsu N, Noguchi M. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma with intramedullary production of platelet-derived growth factor and possibly complicating myelofibrosis: report of a case with review of the literature. Int J Hematol. 2013;98:250–257. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1386-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Le Bousse-Kerdilès MC, Martyré MC. Dual implication of fibrogenic cytokines in the pathogenesis of fibrosis and myeloproliferation in myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Ann Hematol. 1999;78:437–444. doi: 10.1007/s002770050595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jain P, Lin P, Bueso-Ramos C, Verstovsek S, Pemmaraju N. Primary autoimmune myelofibrosis (MF) with high-grade peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) NOS. Eur J Haematol. 2013;91:378–379. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Uehara E, Tasaka T, Matsuhashi Y, Fujita M, Tamura T, Shimoura Y, Mano S, Kuwajima M, Nagai M. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma presenting with rapidly progressing myelofibrosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44:361–363. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000029966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rao SA, Gottesman SR, Nguyen MC, Braverman AS. T cell lymphoma associated with myelofibrosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44:715–718. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000046985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Takai K, Sanada M. [Peripheral T-cell lymphoma initially presenting as secondary myelofibrosis] . Rinsho Ketsueki. 1989;30:2199–2204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nishida M, Iwanaga T, Irimajiri K, Horiuchi A, Hashimoto S, Furuta I. [An autopsy case of immunoblastic lymphadenopathy associated with pancytopenia and interstitial pneumonitis (author’s transl)] . Rinsho Ketsueki. 1981;22:1977–1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brenner B, Green J, Rosenbaum H, Ben Arieh Y, Nagler A, Tatarsky I. Severe pancytopenia due to marked marrow fibrosis associated with angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy. Acta Haematol. 1985;74:43–44. doi: 10.1159/000206163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saito T, Miyawaki S, Nemoto K, Suga H, Yashiro K, Baba N, Uchida S, Kojima M, Ito H, Joshita T, Machinami R. [A case report of angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy accompanying pancytopenia and bone marrow fibrosis] . Rinsho Ketsueki. 1988;29:2073–2078. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sato I, Miura A, Yokomichi H, Suzuki C, Ichinohazama R. [Angio-immunoblastic lymphadenopathy with fibrosis of bone marrow, lymph node, liver and spleen, and proliferation of epithelioid cells in lymph nodes] . Rinsho Ketsueki. 1990;31:958–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Orth T, Treichel U, Mayet WJ, Störkel S, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH. [Reversible myelofibrosis in angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy] . Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994;119:694–698. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okabe S, Miyazawa K, Iguchi T, Sumi M, Takaku T, Ito Y, Kimura Y, Serizawa H, Mukai K, Ohyashiki K. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma together with myelofibrosis with elevated plasma transforming growth factor-beta1. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005;46:599–602. doi: 10.1080/10428190400029809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abe Y, Ohshima K, Shiratsuchi M, Honda K, Nishimura J, Nawata H, Muta K. Cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma presenting as secondary myelofibrosis with high levels of PDGF and TGF-beta. Eur J Haematol. 2001;66:210–212. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2001.00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsui K, Adachi M, Tominaga T, Shinohara K, Kamei T. Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma associated with reversible myelofibrosis. Intern Med. 2008;47:1921–1924. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kikukawa M, Umahara T, Kikawada M, Kanaya K, Sakurai H, Shin K, Mori M, Iwamoto T. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma presenting as myelofibrosis with the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9:395–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES