Skip to main content
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2015 Mar 12;6(8):5490–5500. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3545

Aberrant nuclear factor-kappa B activity in acute myeloid Leukemia: from molecular pathogenesis to therapeutic target

Jianbiao Zhou 1, Ying Qing Ching 1, Wee-Joo Chng 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC4467382  PMID: 25823927

Abstract

The overall survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been improved significantly over the last decade. Molecularly targeted agents hold promise to change the therapeutic landscape in AML. The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) controls a plethora of biological process through switching on and off its long list of target genes. In AML, constitutive NF-κB has been detected in 40% of cases and its aberrant activity enable leukemia cells to evade apoptosis and stimulate proliferation. These facts suggest that NF-κB signaling pathway plays a fundamental role in the development of AML and it represents an attractive target for the intervention of AML. This review summarizes our current knowledge of NF-κB signaling transduction including canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways. Then we specifically highlight what factors contribute to the aberrant activation of NF-κB activity in AML, followed by an overview of 8 important clinical trials of the first FDA approved proteasome inhibitor, Bortezomib (Velcade®), which is a NF-κB inhibitor too, in combination with other therapeutic agents in patients with AML. Finally, this review discusses the future directions of NF-κB inhibitor in treatment of AML, especially in targeting leukemia stem cells (LSCs).

Keywords: NF-κB, Acute myeloid leukemia, Leukemia, Bortezomib, Velcade

INTRODUCTION

The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a dimeric transcription factor which plays versatile crucial roles in a plethora of normal cellular functions by controlling a panoply of downstream genes [1-4]. This pro-inflammatory transcription factor consists of rel family proteins, which are related through a highly conserved DNA-binding/dimerization domain called the Rel homology (RH) domain [5]. Currently, five mammalian NF-κB family members have been identified and studied. These include NF-κB1 (p50/p105), NF-κB2 (p52/p100), RelA (p65), RelB and c-Rel [6-8]. The C-terminal regions of RelA, RelB and c-Rel contain a transactivating domain that is important for NF-κB-mediated gene transactivation, while the C-termini of p105 and p100 contain multiple copies of the ankyrin repeats, a 33-residue sequence motif, which is also found in Inhibitor of κB family members [9-11].

In unstimulated state, NF-κB complexes are sequestered in the cytoplasm by Inhibitor of kappa-B (I-κB), which mask the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of NF-κB [12-14]. Upon activation of NF-κB, an upstream IB kinase phosphorylates IκBs at the critical amino acid residues (Ser-32 and Ser-36 of IκBα; Ser-19 and Ser-23 of IκBβ), which are subsequently ubiquitinated by β-transducin repeat-containing protein (βTrCP) and then degraded by the 26S proteasome, allowing freed NF-κB dimers to translocate to the nucleus and transactivate κB-responsive elements [3, 15-17].

NF-κB signaling can occur through either the canonical or non-canonical pathways (Figure 1) [18-21]. These two pathways have different 1) activating stimuli, 2) IKK activating complexes, 3) DNA-binding heterodimers and 4) gene target [22]. The details of these two pathways were summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1. Canonical and non-canonical NF-κB signaling pathways.

Figure 1

Canonical pathway involves activation of IκB kinase [125] complex, which subsequently phosphorylates IκBα for ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, enabling phosphorylation and transient nuclear translocation of p65/p50 NF-κB heterodimer. Non canonical pathway depends on NF-κB inducing kinase [126] and IKKα complex to achieve phosphorylation–induced p100 processing, leading to RelB/p52 complex.

Table 1. Overview of canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways.

NF-κB pathways Canonical Non-canonical
1) Activating stimuli
  • Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Interleukin-1 (IL-1)

  • Toll-like receptors (TLRs)

  • Antigen receptors

  • B-cell activating factor (BAFFR)

  • CD40 ligand

  • Lymphotoxin βR (LTβR)

2) IKK activating complexes
  • IκBα, IκBβ and IκBγ complexes

  • IκBα homodimers

3) DNA-binding heterodimers[124]
  • RelA:p50 (predominantly)

  • cRel:p50

  • RelB:p52 (predominantly)

  • RelA:p52

  • C-Rel:p52

4) Gene targets
(A wide range of NF-κB target genes can be found here: (http://www.bu.edu/nf-kb/gene-resources/target-genes/)
  • Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, GM-CSF)

  • Chemokines (IL8, RANTES, MIP1α, MCP-1)

  • Adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin)

  • Enzymes (iNOS, COX-2, PLA2)

Cytokines (BAFF/BlyS)
Chemokines (BLC, SLC, SDF-1, ELC)
Lymphoid organogenesis genes (PNAd, GlyCAM-1)

NF-κB signaling pathway has been shown to regulate cell survival and apoptosis. Activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) to increase nitric oxide (NO) has been described as a pro-apoptotic function of NF-κB activation [23-25]. However, a study by Brandão et.al reported high iNOS expression in blood samples of AML patients in comparison to controls, which makes this apoptotic pathway questionable [26]. It is possible that acute production of NO triggers apoptosis, in contrast, the chronic production of NO by constitutively activate NF-κB signaling could inhibit the programmed suicide [26]. On the other hand, it is generally accepted that NF-κB activation is responsible for apoptosis resistance, cell proliferation and invasiveness [27-29]. Many tumours have been reported to show upregulation of a large number of NFκB target genes, for examples, FLICE-like inhibitory protein (FLIP), Inhibitors of Apoptosis (IAPs) and some members of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family to inhibit apoptosis; cyclin D1, c-myc and c-myb to enhance cell proliferation; and cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, E-selectin), matrix metalloproteinases and several angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to promote cancer cell invasion [27, 30-35].

It has been well known that Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is an evolutionarily conserved key enzyme that catabolizes free heme [36]. Free heme is lipophilic, so it causes damage in lipid bilayers of cellular membrane, intracellular organelles [37]. Thus, HO-1 has function in protecting cells from apoptosis by escalating free heme catabolism. HO-1 promoter region contains NFκB responsive element and HO-1 expression is regulated by NFκB, in collaboration with other transcription factors [38]. In AML, induction of HO-1 expression has been reported as the mechanism by which AML cells evade tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF)-induced apoptosis [39], as well as chemotherapy-induced apoptosis [40]. Therefore, it appears an attractive approach by targeting both NFκB and HO-1 for anti-AML therapy [41].

Molecular mechanisms of aberrant activation of NF-κB in AML

Constitutive activity of NF-κB is frequently observed in different types of cancer and has been correlated with resistance of cancer cells to radiation and chemotherapies [15, 16, 23, 42-46]. Causes of such aberrant activity could be due to alterations of genes that encode NF-κB and/or its inhibitors that promote NF-κB activation; constitutive activation of IKKs that accelerate IκB phosphorylation following degradation; or exposure to inflammatory stimuli in the tumour microenvironment that constantly trigger the signaling pathway. About 40% of patients with AML have shown increased activity of NF-κB [47]. Here we will discuss various mechanisms leading to aberrant activation of this pathway in AML.

ATM

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase, which is a master regulator of cell cycle checkpoint in response to DNA damage for the maintenance of genomic stability [48-50]. The development of AML involves multiple steps of genetic and epigenetic changes, including activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes [51]. These activated oncogenes in AML cells often induce oxidative stress (high production of reactive oxygen species, ROS) and replication stress, triggering DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, which, in turn, results in phosphorylation of ATM, CHK-1, CHK-2 and H2AX [52, 53]. In AML cells, phosphorylated (activated) ATM interacts with NFκB essential modulator (NEMO), a subunit of IκB kinase complex, and p53-induced death domain protein (PIDD) in the nucleus. Both NEMO and PIDD activate NFκB pathway [54]. Treatment of AML cells with pharmacological inhibitors of ATM or siRNA silencing ATM induces relocalization of NFκB from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, resulting in apoptosis of AML cells [54]. These results suggest constitutively active ATM leads to activate NFκB pathway in AML.

C/EBPα

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) consists of three transactivation domains (TAD1, TAD2 and TAD3) in the amino terminus (N-termal) and a basic leucine zipper domain (bZIP) at its carboxy terminus (C-termal) for DNA binding. C/EBPα is a bZIP transcription factor, which plays a critical role in myeloid development [55-57]. The expression of C/EBPα is tightly regulated during myeloid hematopoiesis. C/EBPα expresses at low level in the HSC and terminal differentiation stage, but high at the transition stage: common myeloid progenitor (CMP) and the granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (GMP) [55, 56]. Consistent with this expression pattern, the study of C/EBPα knock-out mice shows that deletion of C/EBPα selectively blocks myeloid differentiation at transition stage and reduces formation of neutrophils and monocytes [58]. Mutations in the C/EBPα gene have been detected in 10 - 15% of patients with AML [59]. Except for some rare types of mutations, C/EBPα mutations can be classified into two main categories: (1) N-terminal mutations that lead to premature termination of protein translation, resulting in translation of a dominant negative, short C/EBPα p30 isoform; (2) C-terminal mutations that disrupt the bZIP region, resulting loss of DNA binding capacity [60, 61]. The majority of AML patients with C/EBPα mutations have double mutations, i.e., two allele carrying different types of mutations. However, some patients harbor single mutation on one allele only. Of note, only double mutations, but not single mutation of C/EBPα, are associated with favorable prognosis [59, 62]. C/EBPα and its mutant forms, harboring with N-terminal mutations or C-terminal mutations, interact with NFκB components in AML cells [63]. Several lines of evidence indicate that C/EBPα, as well as its mutant variants, interacts with NFκB p50 and induces a subset of NFκB target genes, including pro-survival Bcl-2, FLIP, through promoter binding [63, 64]. Saturating mutagenesis analysis shows that some key residues in the basic region of bZIP domain of C/EBPα is critical for the interaction with NFκB p50 [65]. The expression of C/EBPα is 3-fold lower in NFκB p50 knockout cells and p50 binds to the promoter of C/EBPα αand regulates its expression [66]. On the other hand, C/EBPα and its mutant forms can replace histone deacetylase 1 to 3 on the p50 promoter, inducing p50 expression and activating NFκB activity in AML [67].

RUNX1

RUNX1 (runt-related transcription factor 1) is heterodimeric transcription factor belonging to RUNX gene family (RUNX1, 2, 3). RUNX1 plays a pivotal role in development of definitive hematopoiesis and primitive hematopoiesis [68-71]. Chromosomal abnormalities or point mutation involved in RUNX1 gene define a prognosis and biology distinct subset of AML patients [72, 73]. In mouse RUNX-1 deficient hematopoietic progenitor cells, both canonical and noncanonical pathways of NF-κB signaling are constitutively increased as evidenced by increased nuclear localization of p65 and p52 proteins [74]. Wild type RUNX1 binds to IKK complex in the cytoplasm and attenuates its kinase activity, thus repressing NFκB signaling. However, mutant RUNX1 forms lose the ability to inhibit IKK, leading to aberrant activation of NFκB pathway in AML cases with RUNX1 abnormalities [74].

Table 2. A Summary of Bortezomib in clinical trials for anti-AML therapy.

Treatment regime Subjects Main findings References
Bortezomib + Idarubicin +Cytarabine 9 relapsed and 22 untreated AML
  1. Complete remission (CR): 19 cases (61%)

  2. CR with incomplete platelet recovery: 3 cases

  3. Increased CD74 expression was associated with CR.

  4. This combination regime showed a good safety profile.

Attar EC 2038
Bortezomib + Tipifamib 26 relapsed AML 1 ALL
  1. CR with incomplete platelet recovery: 2 AML cases

  2. Both NFκB and farnesyltransferase activities were inhibited.

  3. The treatment regime was well-tolerable and had clinical activity.

Lancet JE 2011
Bortezomib + Decitabine 19 poor-risk AML patients
  1. 5 CR and 1 incompleted CR were achieved in 10 untreated cases.

  2. FLT3 was decreased via induction of miR-29 by Bortezomib.

  3. Bortezomib plus Decitabine was safe and feasible.

Blum W 2012
Bortezomib + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine 95 untreated AML
  1. CR: 62 cases (65%)

  2. CR with incomplete platelet recovery: 4 cases (4%)

  3. This regime was tolerable and resulted in encouraging CR rate.

Attar EC 2013
Bortezomib + 17-AAG 11 relapsed or refractory AML
  1. The combination resulted in toxicity without measurable response.

  2. Next-generation of HSP90 inhibitior might be evulated again.

Walker AR 2013
Bortezomib + Idarubicin 13 elderly patients (≥60 yrs) with newly diagnoesed AML
7 relapsed AML
  1. CR: 4 cases (20%)

  2. Hematologic response: most of patients

  3. Treatment related-death: 1 case

  4. THis combination was safe and well tolerated.

Howard DS 2013
Bortezomib + Lenalidomide 9 AML patients
14 MDS patients
  1. The treatment regime was tolerable.

  2. Some reponse was observed.

Attar EC 2013
Bortezomib + Azacitidine 23 relapsed or refractory AML
  1. Complete remission (CR): 5 cases (22%)

  2. CR with incomplete platelet recovery: 3 cases

  3. The combination was tolerable and active.

Walker AR 2014

MDS: myelodysplastic syndromes; ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a type II transmembrane protein and the soluble form of TNF-α is secreted by immune systems including macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, T-cells, nature killer (NK)-cells in response to inflammatory stimulation [75, 76]. TNF binds two TNF receptors (TNFR1 and 2) and activates the canonical NFκB pathway [16]. In an AML mouse model, leukemia-initiating cells (LICs) or leukemia stem cells (LSCs) exhibit autocrine TNF-α secretion, which causes constitutive activation of NFκB activity in this unique cell population [77]. This finding is further supported by the positive correlation between NF-κB activity and autocrine TNF-α in human AML samples [77].

Oncogenic kinase activation

RAS protein family includes H-RAS, N-RAS and K-RAS, which are small GTPase proteins [78]. RAS proteins transmit signals from extracellular growth factors by cycling between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound states. N-RAS or K-RAS mutations occur in approximate 20% of AML cases [79, 80]. However, aberrant RAS signaling has been detected in 40% of cases in addition to RAS mutation, primarily due to is somatic mutations in the other receptor tyrosine kinase like FLT3 and c-Kit [79, 80].

Birkenkamp and co-workers observed a significant association between constitutive NFκB DNA-binding activity and persistent RAS signaling in AML blasts [81]. In ex vivo experiments, AML blasts with high NFκB DNA-binding activity underwent less or no spontaneous apoptosis, compared to AML cases with no or low nuclear NFκB expression. By using small molecular inhibitor Ly294002 targeting PI3K/AKT pathway, L-744832 targeting RAS, PD98059 targeting ERK/MAPK signaling and AG1296 targeting FLT3, the authors found that NF-κB DNA-binding activity was inhibited only by RAS and PI3K/AKT inhibitors, thus concluded that increased NF-κB activity was regulated by RAS signaling, but not ERK and FLT3 pathways [81]. In contrast, several other studies clearly demonstrated that either FLT3 overexpression or FLT3 mutation increased NFκB activity in AML [82, 83]. Takahashi and colleagues showed that overexpression of FLT3 in BaF3 cells activated NFB reporter and increase level of IL-6, a NFκB target gene [82]. They also showed a modest positive correlation between FLT3 and IL-6 mRNA expression in AML samples [82]. Similarly, Grosjean-Raillard et al. reported that constitutive activation of FLT3 signaling resulted in activation of NF-κB, while inhibition of FLT3 signaling either by small molecule inhibitor or knockdown of Flt3 with RNAi reduced NF-κB activity and induced apoptosis in AML cell lines and CD34+ primary AML cells [83]. Furthermore, comprehensive biochemical experiments revealed the underlying mechanism of NF-κB activation in which FLT3 kinase physically bound and phosphorylates IKK2, an upstream regulator of canonical NF-κB pathway [83]. In addition, Internal tandem duplications of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD), one of the most common genetic abnormalities in AML [84, 85], induced expression of RelB and p52/NF-B heterodimers, thus promoting non-canonical NF-κB pathway [86]. In summary, activation of both canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways appears to be an important event contributing to the leukemic transformation initiated by some crucial oncogenic kinases.

NF-κB as a target for anti-AML therapy

Because a large body of evidence supports the important role of NFκB as a “hallmark of cancer”, there has been tremendous focus on the development of NFκB inhibitors for cancer treatment in both the academic community and the pharmaceutical industry [87-89]. Different NFκB inhibitors have been classified into 8 groups according to their chemical nature and have been reviewed in details [90-92]. Here, we focus on the proteasome inhibitor, Bortezomib (Velcade®, Millennium Pharmaceuticals) and other promising NFκB inhibitors in clinical trials for treatment of AML.

Bortezomib is the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, which has been approved by FDA (USA) to treat multiple myeloma and now relapsed mantle cell lymphoma too [93-95]. Although the models of action by proteasome inhibition are not fully elucidated, one of the important mechanisms associated with the anti-myeloma functions of Bortezomib is its ability to suppress the NF-κB signaling pathway [96]. IκB, a cellular inhibitory protein of NFκB, is targeted by ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for degradation when it is phosphorylated at serine residue 32 and 36. Inhibition of the proteasome pathway by Bortezomib has been shown to block the degradation of IκBα, thus sequestering NFκB in the cytoplasm and preventing NFκB nuclear translocation and activation of NFκB target genes [97-99]. Because of its ability to inhibit NFκB activity, it provides a rationale to examine the effectiveness of Bortezomib either used alone or in combination with other drugs against AML in various clinical trials. Early phase I trial in AML evaluated Bortezomib as monotherapy in refractory or relapsed acute leukemias. As a monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Bortezomib was 1.25 mg/m2, and was shown to have transient hematological improvements in some patients [100]. In the subsequent trials in AML, Bortezomib was further investigated in combination with other agents. Eight clinical trials that enrolled majority of patients with AML aimed to evaluate the benefit of combination of Bortezomib with other drugs (Table 1) [101-108]. Two trials that combined the use of Bortezomib with Cytarabine and Anthracyclines (Idarubicin or Doxorubicin) showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 61% and 65%, respectively, and a good safety profile [101, 102]. One study of Bortezomib with Idarubicin in high risk of AML patients achieved a CR rate of 20% [106]. The other five trials that co-administrated Bortezomib with other targeted drugs or epigenetic drugs did not produced encouraging CR rate. But, one important note should be taken into consideration is that the subjects in these trials were high-risk patients with either refractory or relapsed AML or older than 60 years. These may be confounding factors that adversely impact on the clinical benefits of these combination therapies. In general, if these combination regimes are well tolerated, they should be further evaluated in standard risk patients. When new generation of inhibitors are developed, they might be tested in the combination regimes too.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last decade, our understanding of NFκB signaling and our ability to target it has evolved significantly. Although there are now 8 different classes of more than 700 NFκB inhibitors, only a few of them have advanced into clinical trials for treatment of AML. At the same time, a growing body of evidence suggests the existence of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in AML leading to the potential relapse of disease and treatment failure [109-111]. LSCs reside mostly in a quiescent cell cycle state, which is similar to their counterparts, the normal hematopoietic stem cells [112-114], thus escaping from the effects of standard chemotherapy drugs which usually target proliferative cells. NF-κB activity is aberrantly increased in primitive human leukemia cells compared to normal primitive bone marrow cells [47, 77, 115, 116], thus it provides a novel concept to treat AML by targeting the difference between HSCs and LSCs as exemplified by the different NF-κB activity between them. [117-120]. In fact, the small molecule NF-κB inhibitor dimethylaminoparthenolide (DMAPT /LC1) has been shown to selectively eradicate AML LSCs in the laboratory [92, 121-123] and is currently evaluated in a phase I-II ‘first in man’ clinical study at Cardiff University, UK (http://medicine.cf.ac.uk/person/dr-steven-knapper/research/). Hopefully, the result of this much anticipated trial will demonstrate effectiveness of NF-κB inhibitor in AML patients.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore and the Singapore Ministry of Education under its Research Centres of Excellence initiative and NMRC Clinician-Scientist IRG Grant CNIG11nov38 (Zhou J). Chng WJ is also supported by NMRC Clinician Scientist Investigator award. The authors apologize to researchers and clinicians whose work could not be discussed due to space limitations.

Footnotes

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Zhou J, Ching YQ and Chng WJ all reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dey A, Tergaonkar V, Lane DP. Double-edged swords as cancer therapeutics: simultaneously targeting p53 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2008;7(12):1031–1040. doi: 10.1038/nrd2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NF-kappaB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions. Genes & development. 2012;26(3):203–234. doi: 10.1101/gad.183434.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hinz M, Scheidereit C. The IkappaB kinase complex in NF-kappaB regulation and beyond. EMBO reports. 2014;15(1):46–61. doi: 10.1002/embr.201337983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wong ET, Tergaonkar V. Roles of NF-kappaB in health and disease: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Clinical science. 2009;116(6):451–465. doi: 10.1042/CS20080502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoffmann A, Natoli G, Ghosh G. Transcriptional regulation via the NF-kappaB signaling module. Oncogene. 2006;25(51):6706–6716. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huguet C, Crepieux P, Laudet V. Rel/NF-kappa B transcription factors and I kappa B inhibitors: evolution from a unique common ancestor. Oncogene. 1997;15(24):2965–2974. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferreira V, Tarantino N, Korner M. Discrimination between RelA and RelB transcriptional regulation by a dominant negative mutant of IkappaBalpha. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998;273(1):592–599. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.1.592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen FE, Huang DB, Chen YQ, Ghosh G. Crystal structure of p50/p65 heterodimer of transcription factor NF-kappaB bound to DNA. Nature. 1998;391(6665):410–413. doi: 10.1038/34956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baldwin AS., Jr The NF-kappa B and I kappa B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annual review of immunology. 1996;14:649–683. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zandi E, Karin M. Bridging the gap: composition, regulation, and physiological function of the IkappaB kinase complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(7):4547–4551. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.7.4547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Millet P, McCall C, Yoza B. RelB: an outlier in leukocyte biology. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2013;94(5):941–951. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0513305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gasparini C, Celeghini C, Monasta L, Zauli G. NF-kappaB pathways in hematological malignancies. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS. 2014;71(11):2083–2102. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1545-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Campbell KJ, Perkins ND. Regulation of NF-kappaB function. Biochemical Society symposium. 2006;(73):165–180. doi: 10.1042/bss0730165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghosh A, Saginc G, Leow SC, Khattar E, Shin EM, Yan TD, Wong M, Zhang Z, Li G, Sung WK, Zhou J, Chng WJ, Li S, Liu E, Tergaonkar V. Telomerase directly regulates NF-kappaB-dependent transcription. Nature cell biology. 2012;14(12):1270–1281. doi: 10.1038/ncb2621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoesel B, Schmid JA. The complexity of NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Molecular cancer. 2013;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Napetschnig J, Wu H. Molecular basis of NF-kappaB signaling. Annual review of biophysics. 2013;42:443–468. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Verma IM, Stevenson JK, Schwarz EM, Van Antwerp D, Miyamoto S. Rel/NF-kappa B/I kappa B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation. Genes & development. 1995;9(22):2723–2735. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.22.2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shih VF, Tsui R, Caldwell A, Hoffmann A. A single NFkappaB system for both canonical and non-canonical signaling. Cell research. 2011;21(1):86–102. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Razani B, Reichardt AD, Cheng G. Non-canonical NF-kappaB signaling activation and regulation: principles and perspectives. Immunol Rev. 2011;244(1):44–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun SC. Non-canonical NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Cell research. 2011;21(1):71–85. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gilmore TD. Introduction to NF-kappaB: players, pathways, perspectives. Oncogene. 2006;25(51):6680–6684. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghosh S, Hayden MS. Celebrating 25 years of NF-kappaB research. Immunol Rev. 2012;246(1):5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chandrasekar B, Friedrichs W, Donzis E, Silva J, Hidalgo M, Freeman J, Weiss G. NF-κB inhibition markedly enhances sensitivity of resistant breast cancer tumor cells to tamoxifen. Annals of oncology. 2004;15(6):885–890. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crowell JA, Steele VE, Sigman CC, Fay JR. Is Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase a Target for Chemoprevention? Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2003;2(8):815–823. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pautz A, Art J, Hahn S, Nowag S, Voss C, Kleinert H. Regulation of the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry / official journal of the Nitric Oxide Society. 2010;23(2):75–93. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brandão MM, Soares E, Salles TSI, Saad STO. Expression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Is Increased in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. Acta Haematologica. 2001;106(3):95–99. doi: 10.1159/000046596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dolcet X, Llobet D, Pallares J, Matias-Guiu X. NF-kB in development and progression of human cancer. Virchows archiv. 2005;446(5):475–482. doi: 10.1007/s00428-005-1264-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ghosh S, Tergaonkar V, Rothlin CV, Correa RG, Bottero V, Bist P, Verma IM, Hunter T. Essential role of tuberous sclerosis genes TSC1 and TSC2 in NF-kappaB activation and cell survival. Cancer cell. 2006;10(3):215–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bai D, Ueno L, Vogt PK. Akt-mediated regulation of NFkappaB and the essentialness of NFkappaB for the oncogenicity of PI3K and Akt. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2009;125(12):2863–2870. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li X, Abdel-Mageed AB, Mondal D, Kandil E. The nuclear factor kappa-B signaling pathway as a therapeutic target against thyroid cancers. Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2013;23(2):209–218. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.0237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carbone C, Melisi D. NF-kappaB as a target for pancreatic cancer therapy. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2012;16(Suppl 2):S1–10. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.645806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ling J, Kumar R. Crosstalk between NFkB and glucocorticoid signaling: a potential target of breast cancer therapy. Cancer letters. 2012;322(2):119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jain G, Cronauer MV, Schrader M, Moller P, Marienfeld RB. NF-kappaB signaling in prostate cancer: a promising therapeutic target? World journal of urology. 2012;30(3):303–310. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0792-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gyrd-Hansen M, Meier P. IAPs: from caspase inhibitors to modulators of NF-kappaB, inflammation and cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2010;10(8):561–574. doi: 10.1038/nrc2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rushworth SA, Zaitseva L, Langa S, Bowles KM, MacEwan DJ. FLIP regulation of HO-1 and TNF signalling in human acute myeloid leukemia provides a unique secondary anti-apoptotic mechanism. Oncotarget. 2010;1(5):359–366. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hjortso MD, Andersen MH. The expression, function and targeting of haem oxygenase-1 in cancer. Current cancer drug targets. 2014;14(4):337–347. doi: 10.2174/1568009614666140320111306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeney V, Balla J, Yachie A, Varga Z, Vercellotti GM, Eaton JW, Balla G. Pro-oxidant and cytotoxic effects of circulating heme. Blood. 2002;100(3):879–887. doi: 10.1182/blood.v100.3.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kurata S, Matsumoto M, Tsuji Y, Nakajima H. Lipopolysaccharide activates transcription of the heme oxygenase gene in mouse M1 cells through oxidative activation of nuclear factor kappa B. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS. 1996;239(3):566–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0566u.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rushworth SA, MacEwan DJ. HO-1 underlies resistance of AML cells to TNF-induced apoptosis. Blood. 2008;111(7):3793–3801. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-104042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heasman SA, Zaitseva L, Bowles KM, Rushworth SA, Macewan DJ. Protection of acute myeloid leukaemia cells from apoptosis induced by front-line chemotherapeutics is mediated by haem oxygenase-1. Oncotarget. 2011;2(9):658–668. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rushworth SA, Bowles KM, Raninga P, MacEwan DJ. NF-kappaB-inhibited acute myeloid leukemia cells are rescued from apoptosis by heme oxygenase-1 induction. Cancer research. 2010;70(7):2973–2983. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Braunstein S, Formenti SC, Schneider RJ. Acquisition of stable inducible up-regulation of nuclear factor-κB by tumor necrosis factor exposure confers increased radiation resistance without increased transformation in breast cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Research. 2008;6(1):78–88. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Voboril R, Weberova-Voborilova J. Constitutive NF-kappaB activity in colorectal cancer cells: impact on radiation-induced NF-kappaB activity, radiosensitivity, and apoptosis. Neoplasma. 2006;53(6):518–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Natoli G. NF-kappaB and chromatin: ten years on the path from basic mechanisms to candidate drugs. Immunol Rev. 2012;246(1):183–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Naugler WE, Karin M. NF-κB and cancer—identifying targets and mechanisms. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2008;18(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Perkins ND. The diverse and complex roles of NF-kappaB subunits in cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2012;12(2):121–132. doi: 10.1038/nrc3204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guzman ML, Neering SJ, Upchurch D, Grimes B, Howard DS, Rizzieri DA, Luger SM, Jordan CT. Nuclear factor-kappaB is constitutively activated in primitive human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood. 2001;98(8):2301–2307. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.8.2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Boohaker RJ, Xu B. The versatile functions of ATM kinase. Biomedical journal. 2014;37(1):3–9. doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.125655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shiloh Y, Ziv Y. The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2013;14(4):197–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chaudhary MW, Al-Baradie RS. Ataxia-telangiectasia: future prospects. The application of clinical genetics. 2014;7:159–167. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S35759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Martelli AM, Evangelisti C, Chiarini F, McCubrey JA. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mTOR signaling network as a therapeutic target in acute myelogenous leukemia patients. Oncotarget. 2010;1(2):89–103. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Esposito MT, So CW. DNA damage accumulation and repair defects in acute myeloid leukemia: implications for pathogenesis, disease progression, and chemotherapy resistance. Chromosoma. 2014;123(6):545–561. doi: 10.1007/s00412-014-0482-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boehrer S, Ades L, Tajeddine N, Hofmann WK, Kriener S, Bug G, Ottmann OG, Ruthardt M, Galluzzi L, Fouassier C, Tailler M, Olaussen KA, Gardin C, Eclache V, de Botton S, Thepot S, et al. Suppression of the DNA damage response in acute myeloid leukemia versus myelodysplastic syndrome. Oncogene. 2009;28(22):2205–2218. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Grosjean-Raillard J, Tailler M, Ades L, Perfettini JL, Fabre C, Braun T, De Botton S, Fenaux P, Kroemer G. ATM mediates constitutive NF-kappaB activation in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene. 2009;28(8):1099–1109. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tenen DG. Abnormalities of the CEBP alpha transcription factor: a major target in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2001;15(4):688–689. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Paz-Priel I, Friedman A. C/EBPalpha dysregulation in AML and ALL. Critical reviews in oncogenesis. 2011;16(1-2):93–102. doi: 10.1615/critrevoncog.v16.i1-2.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Roe JS, Vakoc CR. C/EBPalpha: critical at the origin of leukemic transformation. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2014;211(1):1–4. doi: 10.1084/jem.20132530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang DE, Zhang P, Wang ND, Hetherington CJ, Darlington GJ, Tenen DG. Absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor signaling and neutrophil development in CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha-deficient mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(2):569–574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.2.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Preudhomme C, Sagot C, Boissel N, Cayuela JM, Tigaud I, de Botton S, Thomas X, Raffoux E, Lamandin C, Castaigne S, Fenaux P, Dombret H, Group A. Favorable prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Blood. 2002;100(8):2717–2723. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pabst T, Mueller BU, Zhang P, Radomska HS, Narravula S, Schnittger S, Behre G, Hiddemann W, Tenen DG. Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nature genetics. 2001;27(3):263–270. doi: 10.1038/85820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Leroy H, Roumier C, Huyghe P, Biggio V, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C. CEBPA point mutations in hematological malignancies. Leukemia. 2005;19(3):329–334. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Green CL, Koo KK, Hills RK, Burnett AK, Linch DC, Gale RE. Prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in a large cohort of younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: impact of double CEBPA mutations and the interaction with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(16):2739–2747. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Paz-Priel I, Cai DH, Wang D, Kowalski J, Blackford A, Liu H, Heckman CA, Gombart AF, Koeffler HP, Boxer LM, Friedman AD. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) and C/EBPalpha myeloid oncoproteins induce bcl-2 via interaction of their basic regions with nuclear factor-kappaB p50. Molecular cancer research : MCR. 2005;3(10):585–596. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-05-0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Paz-Priel I, Ghosal AK, Kowalski J, Friedman AD. C/EBPalpha or C/EBPalpha oncoproteins regulate the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways by direct interaction with NF-kappaB p50 bound to the bcl-2 and FLIP gene promoters. Leukemia. 2009;23(2):365–374. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65%.Dooher JE, Paz-Priel I, Houng S, Baldwin AS., Jr and Friedman AD. C/EBPalpha, C/EBPalpha oncoproteins, or C/EBPbeta preferentially bind NF-kappaB p50 compared with p65, focusing therapeutic targeting on the C/EBP:p50 interaction. Molecular cancer research : MCR. 2011;9(10):1395–1405. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang D, Paz-Priel I, Friedman AD. NF-kappa B p50 regulates C/EBP alpha expression and inflammatory cytokine-induced neutrophil production. Journal of immunology. 2009;182(9):5757–5762. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Paz-Priel I, Houng S, Dooher J, Friedman AD. C/EBPalpha and C/EBPalpha oncoproteins regulate nfkb1 and displace histone deacetylases from NF-kappaB p50 homodimers to induce NF-kappaB target genes. Blood. 2011;117(15):4085–4094. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang CQ, Jacob B, Nah GS, Osato M. Runx family genes, niche, and stem cell quiescence. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2010;44(4):275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2010.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Koh CP, Wang CQ, Ng CE, Ito Y, Araki M, Tergaonkar V, Huang G, Osato M. RUNX1 meets MLL: epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis by two leukemia genes. Leukemia. 2013;27(9):1793–1802. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ichikawa M, Yoshimi A, Nakagawa M, Nishimoto N, Watanabe-Okochi N, Kurokawa M. A role for RUNX1 in hematopoiesis and myeloid leukemia. International journal of hematology. 2013;97(6):726–734. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1347-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chuang LS, Ito K, Ito Y. RUNX family: Regulation and diversification of roles through interacting proteins. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2013;132(6):1260–1271. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lam K, Zhang DE. RUNX1 and RUNX1-ETO: roles in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Frontiers in bioscience. 2012;17:1120–1139. doi: 10.2741/3977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Marcucci G, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD. Molecular and clinical advances in core binding factor primary acute myeloid leukemia: a paradigm for translational research in malignant hematology. Cancer investigation. 2000;18(8):768–780. doi: 10.3109/07357900009012209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nakagawa M, Shimabe M, Watanabe-Okochi N, Arai S, Yoshimi A, Shinohara A, Nishimoto N, Kataoka K, Sato T, Kumano K, Nannya Y, Ichikawa M, Imai Y, Kurokawa M. AML1/RUNX1 functions as a cytoplasmic attenuator of NF-kappaB signaling in the repression of myeloid tumors. Blood. 2011;118(25):6626–6637. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Du W, Erden O, Pang Q. TNF-alpha signaling in Fanconi anemia. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2014;52(1):2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Regulation of NF-kappaB by TNF family cytokines. Seminars in immunology. 2014;26(3):253–266. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kagoya Y, Yoshimi A, Kataoka K, Nakagawa M, Kumano K, Arai S, Kobayashi H, Saito T, Iwakura Y, Kurokawa M. Positive feedback between NF-kappaB and TNF-alpha promotes leukemia-initiating cell capacity. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2014;124(2):528–542. doi: 10.1172/JCI68101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Takashima A, Faller DV. Targeting the RAS oncogene. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2013;17(5):507–531. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.764990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ward AF, Braun BS, Shannon KM. Targeting oncogenic Ras signaling in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2012;120(17):3397–3406. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-378596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Reuter CW, Morgan MA, Bergmann L. Targeting the Ras signaling pathway: a rational, mechanism-based treatment for hematologic malignancies? Blood. 2000;96(5):1655–1669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Birkenkamp KU, Geugien M, Schepers H, Westra J, Lemmink HH, Vellenga E. Constitutive NF-kappaB DNA-binding activity in AML is frequently mediated by a Ras/PI3-K/PKB-dependent pathway. Leukemia. 2004;18(1):103–112. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Takahashi S, Harigae H, Ishii KK, Inomata M, Fujiwara T, Yokoyama H, Ishizawa K, Kameoka J, Licht JD, Sasaki T, Kaku M. Over-expression of Flt3 induces NF-kappaB pathway and increases the expression of IL-6. Leukemia research. 2005;29(8):893–899. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Grosjean-Raillard J, Ades L, Boehrer S, Tailler M, Fabre C, Braun T, De Botton S, Israel A, Fenaux P, Kroemer G. Flt3 receptor inhibition reduces constitutive NFkappaB activation in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death. 2008;13(9):1148–1161. doi: 10.1007/s10495-008-0243-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhou J, Bi C, Janakakumara JV, Liu SC, Chng WJ, Tay KG, Poon LF, Xie Z, Palaniyandi S, Yu H, Glaser KB, Albert DH, Davidsen SK, Chen CS. Enhanced activation of STAT pathways and overexpression of survivin confer resistance to FLT3 inhibitors and could be therapeutic targets in AML. Blood. 2009;113(17):4052–4062. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-156422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhou J, Goh BC, Albert DH, Chen CS. ABT-869, a promising multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor: from bench to bedside. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2009;2:33. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-2-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Shanmugam R, Gade P, Wilson-Weekes A, Sayar H, Suvannasankha A, Goswami C, Li L, Gupta S, Cardoso AA, Al Baghdadi T, Sargent KJ, Cripe LD, Kalvakolanu DV, Boswell HS. A noncanonical Flt3ITD/NF-kappaB signaling pathway represses DAPK1 in acute myeloid leukemia. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012;18(2):360–369. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(7):1073–1081. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shen HM, Tergaonkar V. NFkappaB signaling in carcinogenesis and as a potential molecular target for cancer therapy. Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death. 2009;14(4):348–363. doi: 10.1007/s10495-009-0315-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sethi G, Tergaonkar V. Potential pharmacological control of the NF-kappaB pathway. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2009;30(6):313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gilmore TD, Herscovitch M. Inhibitors of NF-kappaB signaling: 785 and counting. Oncogene. 2006;25(51):6887–6899. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Reikvam H, Olsnes AM, Gjertsen BT, Ersvar E, Bruserud O. Nuclear factor-kappaB signaling: a contributor in leukemogenesis and a target for pharmacological intervention in human acute myelogenous leukemia. Critical reviews in oncogenesis. 2009;15(1-2):1–41. doi: 10.1615/critrevoncog.v15.i1-2.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fuchs O. Transcription factor NF-kappaB inhibitors as single therapeutic agents or in combination with classical chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Current molecular pharmacology. 2010;3(3):98–122. doi: 10.2174/1874467211003030098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chng WJ, Lau LG, Yusof N, Mow BM. Targeted therapy in multiple myeloma. Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. 2005;12(2):91–104. doi: 10.1177/107327480501200204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Blade J, Cibeira MT, Rosinol L. Bortezomib: a valuable new antineoplastic strategy in multiple myeloma. Acta oncologica. 2005;44(5):440–448. doi: 10.1080/02841860510030002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Demchenko YN, Kuehl WM. A critical role for the NFkB pathway in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2010;1(1):59–68. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Richardson PG, Mitsiades C, Schlossman R, Munshi N, Anderson K. New drugs for myeloma. The oncologist. 2007;12(6):664–689. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mani A, Gelmann EP. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(21):4776–4789. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shen M, Schmitt S, Buac D, Dou QP. Targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system for cancer therapy. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2013;17(9):1091–1108. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.815728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wu ZH, Shi Y. When ubiquitin meets NF-kappaB: a trove for anti-cancer drug development. Current pharmaceutical design. 2013;19(18):3263–3275. doi: 10.2174/1381612811319180010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cortes J, Thomas D, Koller C, Giles F, Estey E, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G, McConkey D, Ruiz SL, Guerciolini R, Wright J, Kantarjian H. Phase I study of bortezomib in refractory or relapsed acute leukemias. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2004;10(10):3371–3376. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Attar EC, De Angelo DJ, Supko JG, D'Amato F, Zahrieh D, Sirulnik A, Wadleigh M, Ballen KK, McAfee S, Miller KB, Levine J, Galinsky I, Trehu EG, Schenkein D, Neuberg D, Stone RM, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of bortezomib in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2008;14(5):1446–1454. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Attar EC, Johnson JL, Amrein PC, Lozanski G, Wadleigh M, DeAngelo DJ, Kolitz JE, Powell BL, Voorhees P, Wang ES, Blum W, Stone RM, Marcucci G, Bloomfield CD, Moser B, Larson RA. Bortezomib added to daunorubicin and cytarabine during induction therapy and to intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia age 60 to 75 years: CALGB (Alliance) study 10502. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31(7):923–929. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lancet JE, Duong VH, Winton EF, Stuart RK, Burton M, Zhang S, Cubitt C, Blaskovich MA, Wright JJ, Sebti S, Sullivan DM. A phase I clinical-pharmacodynamic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in advanced acute leukemias. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17(5):1140–1146. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Blum W, Schwind S, Tarighat SS, Geyer S, Eisfeld AK, Whitman S, Walker A, Klisovic R, Byrd JC, Santhanam R, Wang H, Curfman JP, Devine SM, Jacob S, Garr C, Kefauver C, et al. Clinical and pharmacodynamic activity of bortezomib and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119(25):6025–6031. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-413898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Walker AR, Klisovic RB, Garzon R, Schaaf LJ, Humphries K, Devine SM, Byrd JC, Grever MR, Marcucci G, Blum W. Phase I study of azacitidine and bortezomib in adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2014;55(6):1304–1308. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.833333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Howard DS, Liesveld J, Phillips GL, 2nd, Hayslip J, Weiss H, Jordan CT, Guzman ML. A phase I study using bortezomib with weekly idarubicin for treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia research. 2013;37(11):1502–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Walker AR, Klisovic R, Johnston JS, Jiang Y, Geyer S, Kefauver C, Binkley P, Byrd JC, Grever MR, Garzon R, Phelps MA, Marcucci G, Blum KA, Blum W. Pharmacokinetics and dose escalation of the heat shock protein inhibitor 17-allyamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in combination with bortezomib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2013;54(9):1996–2002. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.760733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Attar EC, Amrein PC, Fraser JW, Fathi AT, McAfee S, Wadleigh M, Deangelo DJ, Steensma DP, Stone RM, Foster J, Neuberg D, Ballen KK. Phase I dose escalation study of bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Leukemia research. 2013;37(9):1016–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kreso A, Dick JE. Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell stem cell. 2014;14(3):275–291. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nature medicine. 1997;3(7):730–737. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Terwijn M, Zeijlemaker W, Kelder A, Rutten AP, Snel AN, Scholten WJ, Pabst T, Verhoef G, Lowenberg B, Zweegman S, Ossenkoppele GJ, Schuurhuis GJ. Leukemic stem cell frequency: a strong biomarker for clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. PloS one. 2014;9(9):e107587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Dick JE. Stem cell concepts renew cancer research. Blood. 2008;112(13):4793–4807. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-077941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lutz C, Hoang VT, Buss E, Ho AD. Identifying leukemia stem cells--is it feasible and does it matter? Cancer letters. 2013;338(1):10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Zhou J, Chng WJ. Identification and targeting leukemia stem cells: The path to the cure for acute myeloid leukemia. World journal of stem cells. 2014;6(4):473–484. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i4.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Fang J, Barker B, Bolanos L, Liu X, Jerez A, Makishima H, Christie S, Chen X, Rao DS, Grimes HL, Komurov K, Weirauch MT, Cancelas JA, Maciejewski JP, Starczynowski DT. Myeloid malignancies with chromosome 5q deletions acquire a dependency on an intrachromosomal NF-kappaB gene network. Cell reports. 2014;8(5):1328–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Keutgens A, Robert I, Viatour P, Chariot A. Deregulated NF-kappaB activity in haematological malignancies. Biochemical pharmacology. 2006;72(9):1069–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Volk A, Li J, Xin J, You D, Zhang J, Liu X, Xiao Y, Breslin P, Li Z, Wei W, Schmidt R, Li X, Zhang Z, Kuo PC, Nand S, Zhang J, et al. Co-inhibition of NF-kappaB and JNK is synergistic in TNF-expressing human AML. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2014;211(6):1093–1108. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Misaghian N, Ligresti G, Steelman LS, Bertrand FE, Basecke J, Libra M, Nicoletti F, Stivala F, Milella M, Tafuri A, Cervello M, Martelli AM, McCubrey JA. Targeting the leukemic stem cell: the Holy Grail of leukemia therapy. Leukemia. 2009;23(1):25–42. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.ten Cate B, de Bruyn M, Wei Y, Bremer E, Helfrich W. Targeted elimination of leukemia stem cells; a new therapeutic approach in hemato-oncology. Current drug targets. 2010;11(1):95–110. doi: 10.2174/138945010790031063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ravandi F, Estrov Z. Eradication of leukemia stem cells as a new goal of therapy in leukemia. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2006;12(2):340–344. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Guzman ML, Rossi RM, Neelakantan S, Li X, Corbett CA, Hassane DC, Becker MW, Bennett JM, Sullivan E, Lachowicz JL, Vaughan A, Sweeney CJ, Matthews W, Carroll M, Liesveld JL, Crooks PA, et al. An orally bioavailable parthenolide analog selectively eradicates acute myelogenous leukemia stem and progenitor cells. 2007 doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-090621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Neelakantan S, Nasim S, Guzman ML, Jordan CT, Crooks PA. Aminoparthenolides as novel anti-leukemic agents: Discovery of the NF-κB inhibitor, DMAPT (LC-1) Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2009;19(15):4346–4349. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.05.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Ghantous A, Sinjab A, Herceg Z, Darwiche N. Parthenolide: from plant shoots to cancer roots. Drug discovery today. 2013;18(17-18):894–905. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hostager BS, Bishop GA. CD40-mediated activation of the NF-κB2 pathway. Frontiers in immunology. 2013:4. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Stone RM, O'Donnell MR, Sekeres MA. Acute myeloid leukemia. ASH Education Program Book. 2004;2004(1):98–117. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2004.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Boyerinas B, Park S-M, Hau A, Murmann AE, Peter ME. The role of let-7 in cell differentiation and cancer. Endocrine-Related Cancer. 2010;17(1):F19–F36. doi: 10.1677/ERC-09-0184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES